PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY FOR ACHALASIA: SAFETY PROFILE, COMPLICATIONS AND RESULTS OF 94 PATIENTS.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, with clinical presentation of dysphagia and regurgitation. This is a chronic condition with no cure. Current treatment options aim to reduce lower esophageal sphincter tone by pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical means, with the aim of improving patients' symptoms. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an alternative endoscopic surgery to Heller cardiomyotomy, in which the procedure is performed orally, by endoscopy, offering efficacy comparable to surgical myotomy, with relative ease and minimal invasion, without external incisions. AIMS: To study the safety of POEM by analyzing its results, adverse events and perioperative complications and the main ways to overcome them, in addition to evaluating the effectiveness of the procedure and the short-term postoperative quality of life. METHODS: A qualitative and quantitative, observational and cross-sectional study that analyzed patients who underwent the POEM in a reference center, from December 2016 to December 2022, maintaining the technical standard of pre-, peri- and postoperative protocol. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included in the study, and only three had postoperative complications. The average early postoperative Eckardt score was 0.93 and the late 1.40, with a mean improvement of 7.1 in early results and 6.63 in late results (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: POEM can be reproduced with an excellent safety profile, significant relief of symptoms and improvement in esophageal emptying, and in quality of life.

Successful Design and Implementation of a POEM Program for Achalasia in an Integrated Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment for achalasia with results comparable to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Studies have described the development of proficiency for endoscopists learning to perform POEM, and societies have defined educational and technical objectives for advanced endoscopy fellows in training. However, there is limited guidance on the organizational strategy and educational plan necessary to develop an achalasia service with POEM expertise. AIMS: We aim to outline the steps for design and implementation of a successful POEM program. METHODS: We reported our experience developing a multi-disciplinary clinical program for POEM and the steps taken to achieve procedural proficiency. We also reported our technical success (successful tunneling into the gastric cardia and myotomy of LES muscle fibers) and clinical success (post-procedure Eckardt score ≤ 3) at 3-6 months and 12 months post-procedure. Adverse events were classified per the ASGE lexicon for endoscopic adverse events. RESULTS: After creating a multi-disciplinary clinical program for achalasia and completing procedural proficiency for POEM, our technical success rate was 100% and clinical success rate 90% for the first 41 patients. One adverse event (2.4%) occurred, moderate in severity per the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon for adverse endoscopic events. CONCLUSION: In this study, we outlined the steps involved to establish a POEM service in a large integrated healthcare system. Prior competency in interventional endoscopy, procedural training models, POEM observation and education, proctorship, and interdisciplinary patient care are recommended.

Comparison of Objective Intermediate-Term Outcomes Between per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Show Equivalence.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical gold standard for esophageal motility disorders is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive flexible endoscopic alternative. We compare their intermediate-term outcomes. METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive LHM and POEM patients treated for esophageal motility disorders from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were invited for a comprehensive workup between 6 and 12 months post-myotomy including symptom evaluation, pH testing off medications, manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Primary outcomes include swallowing function and development of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RESULTS: There were 100 patients (46 LHM and 54 POEM). Patient demographics and presenting symptoms were comparable. Follow-up data were obtained from 49% of patients. Average length of follow-up for all patients was 10 months. Mean Eckardt scores for LHM decreased from 6.6 to 2.4 (P < .05) and from 7.06 to 2.2 for POEM (P < .05). Mean integrated relaxation pressure decreased from 22.8 preoperatively to 11 postoperatively in LHM patients and from 24.6 to 11.5 in POEM patients. POEM patients had a lower incidence of objective postoperative GERD with lower average DeMeester scores (20 vs 29.4) and a higher percentage of patients with a normal DeMeester score (47% vs 31%) compared to LHM patients. However, postoperative GERD health related quality of life scores (11.7 vs 14.1), the percent of patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (40% vs 53%), and frequency of grade C/D esophagitis (4.3% vs 5.6%) were lower in LHM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate-term symptom resolution and esophageal physiology are improved equally with both procedures. The development of postoperative GERD is equivalent.

Achalasia: what to do in the face of failures of Heller myotomy.

Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, and while there are several treatment options, there is no consensus regarding them. When therapeutic intervention for achalasia fails, a careful evaluation of the cause of the persistent or recurrent symptoms using upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and contrast radiologic studies is required to understand the cause of therapy failure and guide plans for subsequent treatment. Options for reintervention are the same as for primary intervention and include pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, or redo esophageal myotomy. When reintervention fails or if the esophagus is not amenable to intervention and the disease is considered end-stage, esophagectomy is the last option to manage recurrent achalasia.

Electrical Stimulation of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter to Treat Gastroesophageal Reflux After POEM.

As per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is not followed by any anti-reflux procedure, a common concern is the risk of postoperative gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES-EST) could be an option for post-POEM GERD. A 68-year old male obese patient underwent successful POEM but developed GERD not responsive to proton pump inhibitors. Consecutively, the patient had implanted an electrical LES stimulation device, consisting of bipolar LES-electrodes connected to a subcutaneous pulse generator. POEM reduced the Eckardt score (9 vs. 0), the LES resting pressure (52.0 vs. 16.4 mmHg), and the Integrated Relaxation Pressure (62.0 vs. 10.0 mmHg). LES-EST substantially reduced post-POEM GERD symptoms. GERD-HRQL scores indicated the elimination of heartburn (26 vs. 7) and regurgitation (24 vs. 3) at three months. A reduced total number refluxes (82 vs. 14) was observed. The %-time of pH below 4 was only slightly reduced (8.6% to 6.2%).LES-EST appears to be a feasible option to symptomatically treat post-POEM GERD for patients not ideal for conventional anti-reflux surgery.

Angle of His Accentuation Is a Viable Alternative to Dor Fundoplication as an Adjunct to Laparoscopic Heller Cardiomyotomy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the type of anti-reflux procedure to be used as an adjunct to laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy (LHCM). The aim of this study was to compare Angle of His accentuation (AOH) with Dor Fundoplication (Dor) as an adjunct to LHCM. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with achalasia cardia presenting for LHCM from March 2010 to July 2015 were randomized to Dor and AOH. Symptom severity, achalasia-specific quality of life (ASQOL), new onset heartburn, and patient satisfaction were assessed using standardized scores preoperatively, at 3, 6 months, and then yearly. The primary outcome was relief of esophageal symptoms while secondary outcomes were new onset heartburn and ASQOL. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable with respect to the baseline demographic characteristics. There was no conversion to open and no mortality in either group. Median operative time was 128 min in AOH and 144 min in Dor group (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up was 36 months and was available in 98% patients. There was significant improvement in esophageal symptoms in both groups with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no difference in cumulative symptom scores between the two groups over the period of follow-up. New onset heartburn was seen in 11% in AOH and 9% in Dor group. Mean ASQOL score improved in both groups with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.83). Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: AOH is similar to Dor as an adjunct to LHCM in safety and efficacy and can be performed in shorter time. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI: REF/2014/06/007146.

Esophageal achalasia: current diagnosis and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder of unknown origin, characterized by lack of peristalsis and by incomplete or absent relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in response to swallowing. The goal of treatment is to eliminate the functional obstruction at the level of the gastroesophageal junction. Areas covered: This comprehensive review will evaluate the current literature, illustrating the diagnostic evaluation and providing an evidence-based treatment algorithm for this disease. Expert commentary: Today, we have three very effective therapeutic modalities to treat patients with achalasia - pneumatic dilatation, peroral endoscopic myotomy, and laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication. Treatment should be tailored to the individual patient, in centers where a multidisciplinary approach is available. Esophageal resection should be considered as a last resort for patients who have failed prior therapeutic attempts.

Acalasia cricofaríngea: diagnóstico y alternativas terapéuticas / Cricopharyngeal achalasia: diagnosis and therapeutic alternatives

Introducción. La acalasia cricofaríngea es un trastorno motor que consiste en la falta de relajación del esfínter esofágico superior. Es poco frecuente en pediatría y de etiología multifactorial. Los síntomas son inespecíficos y pueden quedar enmascarados. Caso clínico. Se presentan dos lactantes con disfagia y episodios de atragantamiento. El tránsito intestinal confirmó el diagnóstico de acalasia. En el primero, se realizaron dilataciones endoscópicas, siendo suficientes. En el segundo, a pesar de numerosas dilataciones y una miotomía, la clínica persistía, por lo que se procedió a inyecciones de toxina botulínica. Comentarios. El diagnóstico de acalasia se obtiene mediante un tránsito intestinal y gracias a un alto índice de sospecha. El uso de las dilataciones es la técnica de elección por su baja agresividad, pero se requieren varias sesiones, y, como segunda línea, la cirugía, técnica más invasiva. Además, contamos con la inyección de toxina botulínica, método menos extendido en pediatría, pero seguro y eficaz como alternativa

Introduction. The cricopharyngeal achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder that entails a lack of relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter. It is rare in children and its etiology is related to multiple factors. The symptoms are nonspecific and may be masked by other diseases. Clinical case. Report two infants with dysphagia and choking episodes. Upper gastrointestinal series confirmed cricopharyngeal achalasia. The first patient was treated with endoscopic dilatation, and did not require further therapies. In the second patient, despite numerous dilatations and myotomy, the symptoms persisted so he received botulinum toxin injections. Comments. Diagnosis of achalasia is obtained by upper gastrointestinal series and thanks to a high index of clinical suspicion. The use of endoscopic dilatation is the first option because it is not an invasive technique, but it usually requires several sessions. The second-line therapy is surgery, a more aggressive technique. In addition, the injection of botulinum toxin represents a safe and effective alternative, although it is a less widespread method in pediatrics

Electrical stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure after POEM.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative reflux remains to be a challenge for patients with achalasia undergoing Heller myotomy. Similarly, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining rapid acceptance but the impossibility of adding a fundoplication is questioned as the main pitfall to control reflux. Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has emerged as a new alternative for the treatment of reflux disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of combining electrical stimulation with endoscopic esophageal myotomy to prevent post procedural reflux. METHODS: Five pigs were subjected to POEM. After myotomy was completed, two electrical leads were implanted at the LES level and electrical stimulation was applied with the Endostim system with a regimen of 215 µs (5 mA amplitude), at 20 Hz for 25 min. LES pressures were recorded with manometry at pre and post-myotomy and after LES stimulation. RESULTS: Myotomy was completed successfully in all cases. Mean pre-myotomy LES pressure was 35.99 ± 8.08 mmHg. After myotomy, the LES pressure significantly dropped to 10.60 ± 3.24 mmHg (p = 0.03). Subsequent to LES-EST, LES pressure significantly increased to 21.74 ± 4.65 mmHg (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study show that LES-EST in healthy animals increases LES pressure after POEM procedure, and could be useful tool to minimize gastroesophageal reflux.

Efficacy and durability of robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia: patient symptoms and satisfaction at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has become the standard treatment for achalasia in the USA. Robot-assisted Heller myotomy (RHM) has emerged as an alternative approach due to improved visualization and fine motor control, but long-term follow-up studies have not been reported. We sought to report the long-term outcomes of RHM and compare them to those of LHM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent laparoscopic or RHM between 1995 and 2006. Long-term follow-up was performed via mail or telephone questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was durable relief of dysphagia without need for further intervention. Secondary outcomes included gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, disease-specific quality of life, and patient satisfaction with their operation. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 19) or robotic (n = 56) myotomy during the study period. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 53 (71 %) patients with a median interval of 9 years. RHM was associated with a decreased mucosal injury rate (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.01) and median hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01) compared to conventional laparoscopy. All patients reported initial dysphagia relief, and 80 % required no further intervention. This did not differ between groups. Sixty-two percent required medications to control reflux symptoms at long-term follow-up, including 56 % following robotic myotomy and 80 % after laparoscopic myotomy (p = 0.27). Overall, 95 % of patients were satisfied with their operation, and 91 % would choose surgery again given the benefit of hindsight. CONCLUSION: There is a dearth of long-term follow-up data to support the effectiveness of RHM. This study demonstrates durable dysphagia relief in the vast majority of patients with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a low rate of esophageal mucosal injury. While a significant proportion of patients report reflux symptoms, these symptoms are well controlled with medical acid suppression.

Preoperative ambulatory inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing esophagectomy. A pilot study.

A major decline in pulmonary function is observed on the first day after upper abdominal surgery. This decline can reduce vital and inspiratory capacity and can culminate in restrictive lung diseases that cause atelectasis, reduced diaphragm movement, and respiratory insufficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative ambulatory respiratory muscle training in patients undergoing esophagectomy. The sample consisted of 20 adult patients (14 men [70%] and 6 women [30%]) with a diagnosis of advanced chagasic megaesophagus. A significant increase in maximum inspiratory pressure was observed after inspiratory muscle training when compared with baseline values (from -55.059 ± 18.359 to -76.286 ± 16.786). Preoperative ambulatory inspiratory muscle training was effective in increasing respiratory muscle strength in patients undergoing esophagectomy and contributed to the prevention of postoperative complications.

Heller myotomy vs Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication: cost-utility analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The addition of a Dor antireflux procedure reduces the risk of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) by ninefold following laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. It is not clear, however, how these benefits compare with the increased cost of the fundoplication. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication compared with Heller alone in patients with achalasia. METHODS: We conducted a cost-utility analysis using the Markov simulation model to examine the two treatment alternatives. The model estimated the total expected costs of each strategy over a 10-year time horizon. Data for the model were derived from our randomized clinical trial. The strategies were compared using the method of incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of pathologic GER was 47.6% (10 of 21 patients) in the Heller group and 9.1% (2 of 22 patients) in the Heller plus Dor group using an intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.005). Heller plus Dor was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of GERD (relative risk 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.59; p = 0.01). The cost of surgery was significantly higher for Heller plus Dor than for Heller alone (mean difference $942; p = 0.04), secondary to a longer operating room time (mean difference 40 min; p = 0.01). At a time horizon of 10 years, when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy costs are considered, the cost-utility analysis demonstrates that Heller plus Dor surgery is associated with a total cost of $6,861 per patient and a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 9.9 years, whereas Heller-alone surgery is associated with a cost of $9,541 per patient and a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 9.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In achalasia patients, Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication is preferred to Heller alone because it is both more effective in preventing postoperative GERD and more cost-effective at a time horizon of 10 years.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under local anesthesia for right empyema secondary to aspiration pneumonia caused by esophageal achalasia: case report.

A 55-year-old man was admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine of our hospital with chief complaints of fever, cough, and right-sided chest pain. Plain radiography of the chest revealed widening of the mediastinum (attributed to esophageal achalasia), pneumonia, and right pleural effusion. According to the properties of the pleural fluid, empyema was diagnosed. Because the empyema was resistant to antibiotic treatment and was in the fibrinopurulent stage, it could not be drained effectively. Therefore, after treatment of the esophageal achalasia by balloon dilatation of the lower esophagus, the empyema was treated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, i.e., by video-assisted thoracoscopic drainage and curettage of the empyema cavity, under local anesthesia.

Laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy: an alternative minimally invasive treatment for achalasia stage III.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment for stage III achalasia with markedly dilated and sigmoid-shaped esophagus is a matter of controversy. Some authors recommend esophagectomy as the primary treatment because they believe that Heller myotomy cannot improve dysphagia in such cases. We present a patient with achalasia stage III in whom we successfully performed a laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy with posterior semifundoplication. METHODS: Using a five-trocar technique, the esophagogastric junction and the distal esophagus up to the tracheal bifurcation were dissected. An endoscopic stapler (Endo-GIA II) was inserted through a small gastrotomy at the cardia, with one branch placed in the gastric fundus and the other, under esophagoscopic control, in the esophagus. By two consecutive stapler applications, a wide side-to-side esophagogastrostomy was created. To prevent gastroesophageal reflux, a posterior semifundoplication was performed. RESULTS: The operation time was 170 min. Oral food intake was started after radiologic control on postoperative day 7. Radiologic study showed rapid passage of the barium meal and no reflux through the gastroesophageal junction. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy with posterior semifundoplication represents an alternative to esophagectomy and laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery. Because of the wide side-to-side anastomoses, there is no risk of persisting stenosis such as that reported for the Heller operation, and the procedure certainly is less invasive than esophagectomy. As compared with laparoscopic extramucosal myotomy using anterior Dor fundoplication, it presents about the same technical difficulties.

Treating achalasia: from whalebone to laparoscope.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pathophysiology and management of achalasia. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed publications located via MEDLINE using the search term esophageal achalasia (subheadings: complications, drug therapy, epidemiology, etiology, physiopathology, surgery, and therapy) published in English from 1966 to December 1997. STUDY SELECTION: Of 2632 citations identified, 4.5% were selected for inclusion by authors' blinded review of the abstracts. New developments in the understanding of achalasia or reports of therapeutic efficacy in either controlled trials or uncontrolled consecutive series involving 10 patients or more observed for a year or longer were reviewed in detail. DATA EXTRACTION: All 6 controlled therapeutic trials were included, and therapeutic efficacy in uncontrolled series was assessed by the authors extracting the patients with a good-to-excellent response from each study and calculating a pooled estimate of response rate with individual studies weighted proportionally to sample size. DATA SYNTHESIS: Achalasia results from irreversible destruction of esophageal myenteric plexus neurons causing aperistalsis and failed lower sphincter relaxation. The only therapies that adequately compensate for this dysfunction for a sustained time are pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy. The single controlled trial comparing these treatments found surgery superior to dilation (95% vs 51% nearly complete symptom resolution, P<.01). In uncontrolled trials pneumatic dilation (weighted mean [SD]) is 72% (26%) effective vs 84% (20%) for Heller myotomy. The limitation of dilation is a 3% risk of perforation; thoracotomy morbidity has been the major limitation of myotomy. Surgical morbidity has been sharply reduced by laparoscopic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Both pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy are effective therapies for achalasia; laparoscopic Heller myotomy is emerging as the optimal surgical therapy.

Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy and antireflux procedure with intraoperative manometry.

We have been routinely performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and antireflux procedures. Having this experience, we decided to assess the feasibility and safety of performing a laparoscopic esophagomyotomy and antireflux procedure. Here we present a case of a 37-year-old man with a history of progressive dysphagia and a diagnosis of achalasia, made on the basis of clinical, endoscopic, and manometric studies. Preoperative manometry reported a pressure of 52 mm Hg (normal, 15-25 mm Hg) for 4.5 cm (normal, > 3 cm). Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy and anterior fundoplication were performed. The esophagomyotomy included a 6-cm segment of distal esophagus and 2 cm of stomach; postoperative manometry was 18 mm Hg for 3 cm. Eight months postoperatively, a barium swallow demonstrated no reflux. Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy and antireflux procedure can be performed with efficacy and safety, with the advantage of a shorter hospitalization and an early recovery compared with the traditional procedure. Also, we emphasize the importance of the intraoperative manometry in the relevance of a concomitant antireflux procedure.

Incidência de megacólon sintomático em portadores de megaesôfago chagásico / Incidence of symptomatic megacolon in patients with chagasic megaesophagus

Os autores analisam a incidência de megacólon associado a megaesôfago num período de sete anos. Entre 192 portadores de megaesôfago foram investigados, através de enema opaco, apenas os doentes que apresentavam sintomas sugerindo comprometimento intestinal. Foram diagnosticados 15 casos (7,8%) desta associaçäo. Entre o grupo com megaesôfago e o grupo com a associaçäo megaesôfago e megacólon, näo foram encontradas diferenças significativas quanto ao sexo e idade dos pacientes e grau de megaesôfago. Os sintomas esofágicos, no momento do diagnóstico, precederam os intestinais em 93,3% dos doentes. O tratamento foi variado, mas recentemente, os autores obtiveram bons resultados com o tratamento simultâneo, através de cardiomiotomia de Heller com técnica de Lortat-Jacob modificada e hemicolectomia esquerda

[Incidence of symptomatic megacolon in patients with chagasic megaesophagus]. / Incidência de megacólon sintomático em portadores de megaesôfago chagásico.

The authors analyze the incidence of megacolon associated to megaesophagus during a 7 year period. Of the 192 patients with megaesophagus only 15 who presented associated intestinal symptoms were further investigated through barium enema. No statistically significant differences were found between the group with megaesophagus and the group presenting association of megaesophagus and megacolon as to sex and age of the individuals and severity of megaesophagus. The esophageal symptoms preceded the intestinal symptoms in 93.3% of the cases. Many treatments were used, but recently good results were obtained by the association of Heller's cardiomyotomy with modified Lortat-Jacob's technique and left hemicolectomy.