Association of herbal/botanic supplement use with quality of life, recurrence, and survival in newly diagnosed stage II colon cancer patients: A 2-y follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to investigate the association between herbal/botanic supplement use and perceived quality of life (QoL), cancer recurrence, and all-cause mortality in colon cancer patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 453) newly diagnosed with stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon between 2009 and 2011 were recruited from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Data including demographic variables, herbal medicine use and frequency, lifestyle, diet, cancer treatment, and QoL were collected by interviews at diagnosis (baseline) and 1 and 2 y after diagnosis. Mortality information was obtained via the National Death Index. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Medical Outcomes Short Form 12 (SF-12) were used to evaluate QoL. RESULTS: At baseline, herbal/botanic supplement users were more likely to have a healthier lifestyle than non-users, including more physical activity (P <0.01), more fruit and vegetable consumption (P = 0.01), less smoking (P <0.01), and less energy intake from fat (P = 0.02). After adjustment for potential confounders, no significant association was found between herbal/botanic supplement use and QoL assessed by FACT-C and SF-12. Similarly, herbal/botanic supplement use was not associated with the risk of recurrence, all-cause mortality or the combined. CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with stage II colon cancer using herbal/botanic supplements had no significant improvement in their QoL and no difference in odds of colon cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality over 2 y after diagnosis compared with those who did not use herbs/botanicals. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings and to focus on types of herbal/botanic supplements.

Clinical Significance of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 for Breast Cancer & Adenocarcinomas of Various Internal Organs and Alzheimer's Brain with Increased ß-amyloid (1-42); Combined Use of Optimal Doses of Vitamin D3 and Taurine 3 times/day Has Significant Beneficial Effects of Anti-Cancer, Anti-Ischemic Heart, and Memory & Other Brain Problems By Significant Urinary Excretion of Viruses, Bacteria, and Toxic Metals & Substances.

Human Papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) has a significant role in various cancers and Alzheimer's disease. 500 breast cancer mammograms as well as 3 cases of adenocarcinomas of esophagus, stomach, colon, prostate gland, uterus, ovary that was examined had significant infection of HPV- 16 with significantly increased ß- amyloid (1-42). When a strong HPV-16 infection is found in the oral cavity, repeated exposure to the infected individual's coughing can infect others easily through saliva. Just like all of above cancer tissues, all 20 Alzheimer's cases that were examined had significantly increased HPV-16 of 1500-3000ng with markedly reduced Acetylcholine of 0.5~1.5ng and significantly increased 3- amyloid (1-42) of 7.5ng or higher. Since every cancer and Alzheimer's patient examined had significantly reduced amounts of Vitamin D3 and Taurine, the author examined the effects of Vitamin D3 and Taurine independently, or by combination. Each of optimal doses of Vitamin D3 and Taurine had significant beneficial effects that were anti-cancer, anti-cardiac ischemia, and memory loss & other brain problems, with significant excretion of HPV- 16 and bacteria such as Borrelia Burgdorferi, if it exists, through the urine, without using any anti-viral or anti-bacterial agents. However, when optimal doses of Taurine and Vitamin D3 were used together, 3 times/day, there was reduction of cancer-associated Oncogene CfosAB-2 or Integrin a5p1 with significantly high values of 200-500ng which were reduced to 0.001-0.004ng. Memory and brain function improved by increasing markedly reduced abnormal Acetylcholine of 1.5ng or less to a few hundred-2500ng with increase in DHEA. Abnormally increased P-amyloid (1-42) is markedly reduced. Ischemic heart, where there is abnormally increased Cardiac Troponin I, reduced significantly. In addition, abnormally reduced DHEA levels often increase. HPV- 16 in urine increased from an average of 100~15ng to an average of 4000ng and cancer related parameters in the urine significantly increased. Thus, the author found combined use of optimal dose of Vitamin D3 400 I.U. and optimal dose of Taurine 175mg, 3/day, was found to be one of the safest, most effective treatments for cancer, memory problems & other brain abnormality, and Ischemic heart problems, and this combination seems to improve any part of the body. One should try this method before using any other treatment, which has a potential side effect.

Improving couples' quality of life through a Web-based prostate cancer education intervention

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a newly developed web-based, couple-oriented intervention called Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC). DESIGN: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods approach. SETTING: Oncology outpatient clinics at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at UNC­Chapel Hill. SAMPLE: 26 patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) and their partners. METHODS: Pre- and postpilot quantitative assessments and a postpilot qualitative interview were conducted. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: General and PCa-specific symptoms, quality of life, psychosocial factors, PERC's ease of use, and web activities. FINDINGS: Improvement was shown in some PCa-specific and general symptoms (small effect sizes for patients and small-to-medium effect sizes for partners), overall quality of life, and physical and social domains of quality of life for patients (small effect sizes). Web activity data indicated high PERC use. Qualitative and quantitative analyses indicated that participants found PERC easy to use and understand,as well as engaging, of high quality, and relevant. Overall, participants were satisfied with PERC and reported that PERC improved their knowledge about symptom management and communication as a couple. CONCLUSIONS: PERC was a feasible, acceptable method of reducing the side effects of PCa treatment­related symptoms and improving quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: PERC has the potential to reduce the negative impacts of symptoms and enhance quality of life for patients with localized PCa and their partners, particularly for those who live in rural areas and have limited access to post-treatment supportive care.

Quality of Life after Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection (ELRR) by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM).

AIM: Endoluminal Loco-Regional Resection (ELRR) by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) may be considered a valid alternative surgical treatment in patients with rectal cancer. Aim of this study is to evaluate the short and medium term Quality of Life (QoL) from prospectively collected data in patients who underwent ELRR by TEM. MATERIAL OF STUDY: From May 2010 to June 2013, 31 patients with iT1-iT2-iT3N0 rectal cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients with T1 rectal cancer underwent ELRR by TEM. Patients with iT2-iT3 rectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant radio-chemoterapy (n-RCT) before surgery. QoL was evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires before surgery and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean distance from the anal verge was 5.4 cm (range 1-10). Mean operative time was 145.8 minutes (range 60-300). Pathological staging was as follows: pT0N0 (6), pT1N0 (18), pT2N0 (7). At 1 month after surgery, in QLQC30 questionnaire, significant worsening was observed in Global Health Status (p=0.0028), Physical Functioning (p=0.0016), Role Functioning (p=0.0004), Fatigue (p=0.0024), Pain (p=0.0003) and Dyspnoea (p=0.0192). In QLQCR38 questionnaire significant worsening at 1 month was observed in Defecation Problems (p=0.0005) and Weight Loss (p=0.0008). At six and twelve months after surgery, no significant differences were observed in QLQ-C30 and in QLQCR38 questionnaires. DISCUSSION: QoL evaluation showed worsening results at 1 month after ELRR by TEM, in QLQ-C30 and in QLQCR38 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 and 12 months after surgery, no significant differences in QoL as compared to preoperative status were observed.

Levels of fatigue and distress in senior prostate cancer survivors enrolled in a 12-week randomized controlled trial of Qigong.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a commonly reported symptom by prostate cancer survivors and is associated with significant distress and declines in quality of life. Qigong is a mind-body activity that consists of both physical activity and meditative aspects. This 12-week randomized controlled trial examined the feasibility and efficacy of a Qigong intervention for improving older prostate cancer survivors' levels of fatigue and distress. METHODS: Forty older (median age = 72, range = 58-93), fatigued (cut-off value of ≥ 1 on the CTCAEv4.0, >20 on a fatigue grading scale), and sedentary (<150 min of moderate exercise/week) prostate cancer survivors were randomized to 12 weeks of Qigong or stretching classes. Primary outcomes were feasibility (i.e., retention and class attendance rates) and fatigue [Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)], and secondary outcome was distress [Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18)]. RESULTS: Study retention rates did not significantly differ between study groups (Qigong = 80 %, stretching = 65 %, p = 0.48). The Qigong group had significantly higher class attendance than the stretching group (p = 0.04). The Qigong group had significantly greater improvements in the FACIT-Fatigue (p = 0.02) and distress (i.e., BSI-18 Somatization, Anxiety, & Global Severity Index, p's < 0.05), than the Stretching group. CONCLUSIONS: This 12-week Qigong intervention was feasible and potentially efficacious in improving senior prostate cancer survivors' levels of fatigue and distress levels. Future, larger definitive randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these benefits in older prostate cancer survivors and in racially and ethnically diverse populations. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Qigong may be an effective nonpharmacological intervention for the management of senior prostate cancer survivors' fatigue and distress.

Health-related quality of life during postoperative chemoradiotherapy with oral uracil-tegafur and leucovorin in rectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of this study was to report on the quality of life of locally advanced rectal cancer patients that were treated with uracil-tegafur (UFT)/leucovorin (LV)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-five patients were enrolled into this prospective study. Radiotherapy (50.4Gy) was given with concurrent UFT (300mg/m2/day) and LV (30mg/day). Turkish versions of EORTC-QLQC30 and EORTC QLQCR38 were applied at the beginning (HRQoL-1) and at the end (HRQoL-2) of chemoradiotherapy. Paired samples t-test was used to compare the difference of means for each scale between HRQoL1 and HRQoL2 and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Study compliance was 80.6%. From baseline to the end of chemoradiotherapy, the mean scores of dyspnea (p=0.006) diarrhea (p=0.005) and micturition (p=0.005) increased significantly. Chemotherapy side effects also increased at the end of therapy (p=0.07). Seventy-six percent (76%) of male patients replied to questions related to sexual problems and functions, whereas no female patients replied. CONCLUSIONS: Although, diarrhea and micturition are the major problems, quality of life scores indicate that concurrent oral fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy is a feasible treatment.

[Anemia caused by cancer in the context of palliative care]. / Tumoranämie im palliativen Kontext.

Tumor anemia is very common in patients with cancer. The causes are very diverse and the parameter value depends on several factors. If this however develops to be symptomatic it may adversely impact health related quality of life. Erythropoietin or blood transfusion provides options for treatment. However, these are not always uneventful. There could also be a lack of response to Erythropoietin. This case report describes the complexity of tumor anemia. It also includes a more detailed discussion on the Fatigue Syndrome, which is one of the most common symptoms of patients with cancer. In the context of palliative care there is often the question of alternatives for improving the quality of patients life. Some kinds of treatment may also cause the opposite effect. A multidimensional assessment should help to approach this difficult issue and to find ways for a meaningful treatment of the symptoms of anemia.

Knowledge about hereditary colorectal cancer among colorectal cancer survivors.

AIM: Little is known about colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' knowledge regarding hereditary CRC (HCRC). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate CRC survivors' level of knowledge about HCRC and determine if this knowledge varies by demographic or clinical characteristics. METHODS: Data were obtained using a cross-sectional survey of CRC patients at low, moderate, and high risk for HCRC seen at a comprehensive cancer center over a 5-year period (n = 93). Seven items (with potential responses of yes/no/don't know) assessed patients' knowledge. A t-test was conducted to compare composite knowledge among individuals at increased risk for CRC to those who were not at increased risk. RESULTS: For all but one of seven questions, most individuals reported that they did not know the answer to the question. Knowledge among participants at increased risk for HCRC (mean = 2.46, standard deviation = 1.93) was greater than those who were not at increased risk (mean = 1.51, standard deviation = 1.84). There was a statistically significant difference in knowledge between the groups, t(90) = 2.40, p = 0.018. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest an overall deficit of knowledge among CRC patients. More efforts should focus on increasing knowledge about HCRC prevention among patients and family members. With a better understanding of knowledge gaps, researchers and health-care providers can reevaluate how to better inform CRC patients about HCRC risks.

[Quality of life after radiotherapy for prostate cancer]. / Qualité de vie après radiothérapie pour un cancer localisé de la prostate.

The goal of localized prostate cancer radiotherapy is to cure patients. The decision-making must integrate the survival but also the quality of life of patients. Some French validated self-reported questionnaires are available to evaluate quality of life. Whatever the treatments (radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, external beam radiation, with or without hormonotherapy), even if patients report more sequelae, their long-term quality of life is similar to that of the general population, except for patients treated with hormonotherapy who complain more decline of physical quality of life. In comparison with prostatectomy, patients treated with external beam radiation report less long-lasting urinary symptoms, but more bowel side effects, with no difference in global quality of life. Sexual disorders are initially less important with external beam radiation but increase over time. Brachytherapy shows no sexual function preservation benefit relative to radiation and may be less favourable with more urinary sequelae. The association of hormonotherapy and external beam radiation decreases the quality of life of the patients, with a negative impact on vitality, sexuality and increase urinary disorders. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) seems to better preserve the long-term digestive quality of life in comparison with conformal radiation therapy. Post-prostatectomy could induce more digestive toxicity, such as rectal irritation. The adjunction of hormonotherapy to radiation, the previous medical history of abdominal surgery, the field of radiation and the acute reactions to radiation are the main predictive factors to late toxicity and should be considered in the choice of initial treatment and for the follow-up.

Health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients receiving oral UFT plus leucovorin compared with those with surgery alone.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy of oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) has been accepted as the standard of care in the treatment of patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon. The objective of the study was to compare HRQOL reported by patients receiving oral UFT plus LV (UFT/LV group) versus no adjuvant treatment (control group) following surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: Ninety nine patients in the UFT/LV group and 83 in the control group participated. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and HRQOL data measured longitudinally following surgery were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent (87 of 99) received all scheduled doses of UFT plus LV during the first three cycles, and 82 percent (81 of 99) did so for five cycles. The most common type of toxicity in the UFT/LV group was fatigue, which was generally mild. Six patients each had grade 3 diarrhea or anorexia. There were significant differences in the scores for role function, and specific limitations such as fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss, and financial difficulties, which deteriorated in the UFT/LV group. CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL in colorectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy with oral UFT plus LV deteriorated during this phase of treatment compared with those with surgery alone, despite the biased stage of tumor between the groups. Symptom management and social support would improve HRQOL in such a group of patients.

Marital status and quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer or Barrett's esophagus: the mayo clinic esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus registry study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) report deficits in quality of life (QOL), depending on the extent of malignant disease and the goals of treatment at the time of QOL measurement. AIMS: To quantify the association of marital status and changes in QOL over time in patients with EC and patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). METHODS: Eligible patients in the Mayo Clinic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus Registry completed QOL assessments at baseline and approximately 1 year later. QOL was determined with a ten-point linear analog self-assessment scale evaluating overall QOL and 12 subscales. RESULTS: Overall, 489 BE patients and 212 EC patients were evaluated. Married EC patients reported higher baseline QOL in legal concerns (8.1 vs. 7.1; p = .04) and friend and family support (9.3 vs. 8.4; p = .02) than single EC patients. Over time, married EC patients had a decrease in pain frequency QOL compared to single EC patients (-0.9 vs. +0.6; p = .02), with other QOL measures being stable. Married BE patients showed higher social activity QOL at baseline than single BE patients (7.5 vs. 6.9; p = .02); QOL was stable over time between the marital status groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minor, but statistically significant, changes were reported regarding QOL in two categories at baseline and over time among married and single patients with EC. Minor differences may be present between married and single EC patients regarding spiritual QOL at baseline and in overall physical well-being QOL at baseline and over time, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Validation of patient's self-reported social functioning as an independent prognostic factor for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of an international study by the Chronotherapy Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

PURPOSE: A recent study identified a prognostic model for survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients which included WBC count, alkaline phosphatase (AP), number of metastatic sites, and patients' self-reported social functioning. The aim of this research is to validate this model on data from an independent sample. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This validation study is based on a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer conducted by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Chronotherapy Group. Overall, 564 patients in 10 countries were enrolled. For the purpose of this independent validation, patients with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) baseline data were analyzed. HRQOL was assessed using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of survival. RESULTS: The previous model with an additional adjustment, by stratification for sex, was replicated and its parameters were confirmed to independently predict survival: WBC count with an hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.021 to 1.698; P = .034); AP with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.188 to 1.979; P = .001); number of sites involved with an HR of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.531 to 2.364; P < .0001); and patients' self-reported social functioning with an HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.905 to 0.976; P = .001). The latter translates into a 6% increase in the likelihood of an earlier death for every 10-point decrease in the social functioning scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. CONCLUSION: This study provides confirmatory evidence of the independent prognostic value of patients' self-reported social functioning in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Prostate cancer: a chronic illness.

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the second-leading cause of cancer death in men. The 10-year survival rate for all stages of prostate cancer is 93%. Men with prostate cancer live with the disease for many years, and the side effects of the disease and treatments have physical and psychosocial implications for the patient, spouse, and family. This case study explores the evolution of a patient with prostate cancer, from time of diagnosis through treatment decision making and ultimately end of life. Discussion of the implications for practice and research is included.

[Evaluation of the toxicity and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy]. / Avaliação da qualidade de vida e toxicidades em pacientes com câncer colorretal tratados com quimioterapia adjuvante baseada em fluoropirimidinas.

BACKGROUND: The colorectal cancer is the fourth cause of cancer in Brazil and 5-fluorouracil is the drug most commonly used in the adjuvant or palliative treatment of this disease. AIM - Evaluating in patients with colorectal cancer and chemotherapy, the toxicity and the quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2001 and May 2003, 45 patients treated with colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluourouracil and folinic acid were followed closely during six cycles. The gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity was analysed making use of the chart "Recommendations for the Graduation of Acute and Subacute Toxicity". After the end of each cycle of chemotherapy, the results were registered according to the respectives degrees that vary from 0 to 4. The quality of life was researched through the WHOQOL bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life) questionary that consists of 26 questions and 4 domains: physical, psychological, social relations and environmental, in the beginning, on the 3rd and 6th cycles of treatment. RESULTS: Among the 45 patients, 28 were male, the average age was 58.4 years old (from 34 to 79 years old). According to the International Union Against Cancer classification, 34 patients (75.6%) had tumors stage II or III and 11 had tumors stage IV (24.4%), 64.4% were in the colon. In 57.7% the chemotherapy was adjuvant and in the others palliative. The toxicities more commonly found were nauseas (42%), diarrhea (38%), and neutropenia (15.7%). There was no significant difference among the degrees of toxicity in the different cycles as well as among the patients in adjuvant or palliative treatment. Significant alterations was found among the quality of life in the physical and psychological domains when the 1st and the 2nd or the 1st and the 3rd application of the test were done. Alterations of the quality of life were also found in the social domain when the first evaluation was compared with the last one. There was no difference between the quality of life and the treatment.

Avaliação da qualidade de vida e toxicidades em pacientes com câncer colorretal tratados com quimioterapia adjuvante baseada em fluoropirimidinas / Evaluation of the toxicity and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy

RACIONAL: O câncer colorretal é a quarta causa de câncer no Brasil e o 5-fluourouracil uma das principais drogas usadas no tratamento adjuvante e paliativo dessa doença. A toxicidade da quimioterapia e as alterações de qualidade de vida, causadas pela própria doença e pelo tratamento, são motivo de muitos estudos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar nos doentes com câncer colorretal em tratamento quimioterápico, a toxicidade e possíveis alterações da qualidade de vida. MÉTODOS: Durante o período de março de 2001 a maio de 2003 no Ambulatório de Oncologia da Disciplina de Gastroenterologia Clínica da Universidade Federal de São Paulo, foram acompanhados 45 pacientes com câncer colorretal em tratamento quimioterápico adjuvante ou paliativo com 5-fluourouracil e ácido folínico durante seis ciclos. A toxicidade gastrointestinal e hematológica foi analisada utilizando-se as Recomendações para a Graduação da Toxicidade Aguda e Subaguda. Após o término de cada ciclo quimioterápico, os resultados foram anotados de acordo com os respectivos graus que variaram entre 0 e 4. A qualidade de vida foi pesquisada pelo questionário WHOQOL bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life) que consta de 26 questões e é composto por 4 domínios: físico, psicológico, relações sociais e meio ambiente, no início, no 3° e no 6° ciclo de tratamento. RESULTADOS: Entre os 45 pacientes, 28 eram do sexo masculino, a média de idade foi de 58,4 anos (34 a 79 anos). Segundo a classificação da União Internacional Contra o Câncer, 34 (75,6 por cento) eram estádio II ou III e 11 estádio IV (24,4 por cento). Quanto à localização, 64,4 por cento eram de cólon. Em 57,7 por cento a quimioterapia foi adjuvante e nos demais paliativa. As toxicidades mais comumente encontradas foram náuseas (42 por cento), diarréia (38 por cento) e neutropenia (15,7 por cento). Não houve diferença significante entre os graus de toxicidade nos diferentes ciclos, assim como entre os doentes em tratamento adjuvante ou paliativo. Quanto à qualidade de vida foram observadas alterações significantes nos domínios físico e psicológico quando comparadas a primeira com a segunda ou a primeira com a terceira aplicação do questionário. Não foi encontrada alteração da qualidade de vida entre os doentes em quimioterapia adjuvante quando comparada aos em tratamento paliativo. Independente da indicação terapêutica, a média dos escores de qualidade de vida diminuiu em relação aos domínios físico e social na terceira aplicação do teste. CONCLUSÃO: As toxicidades gastrointestinais foram mais freqüentes que as hematológicas com o esquema utilizado. A qualidade de vida diminuiu após o início da quimioterapia em relação à atividade física e psicológica. No estudo da média dos escores observou-se queda dos mesmos nos domínios físico e social. A análise do questionário não mostrou alteração de qualidade vida quando comparados os doentes em tratamento paliativo com os em adjuvância.

BACKGROUND: The colorectal cancer is the fourth cause of cancer in Brazil and 5-fluorouracil is the drug most commonly used in the adjuvant or palliative treatment of this disease. AIM - Evaluating in patients with colorectal cancer and chemotherapy, the toxicity and the quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2001 and May 2003, 45 patients treated with colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluourouracil and folinic acid were followed closely during six cycles. The gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity was analysed making use of the chart "Recommendations for the Graduation of Acute and Subacute Toxicity". After the end of each cycle of chemotherapy, the results were registered according to the respectives degrees that vary from 0 to 4. The quality of life was researched through the WHOQOL bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life) questionary that consists of 26 questions and 4 domains: physical, psychological, social relations and environmental, in the beginning, on the 3rd and 6th cycles of treatment. RESULTS: Among the 45 patients, 28 were male, the average age was 58.4 years old (from 34 to 79 years old). According to the International Union Against Cancer classification, 34 patients (75.6 percent) had tumors stage II or III and 11 had tumors stage IV (24.4 percent), 64.4 percent were in the colon. In 57.7 percent the chemotherapy was adjuvant and in the others palliative. The toxicities more commonly found were nauseas (42 percent), diarrhea (38 percent), and neutropenia (15.7 percent). There was no significant difference among the degrees of toxicity in the different cycles as well as among the patients in adjuvant or palliative treatment. Significant alterations was found among the quality of life in the physical and psychological domains when the 1st and the 2nd or the 1st and the 3rd application of the test were done. Alterations of the quality of life were also found in the social domain when the first evaluation was compared with the last one. There was no difference between the quality of life and the treatment.

Mental health of low income uninsured men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated mental health outcomes in a cohort of low income, uninsured men with prostate cancer and identified factors that influence mental health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 277 subjects enrolled in a program that provides free care to men with prostate cancer who have an annual income of no more than 200% of the federal poverty level. We compared scores on the 5-item RAND Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) to those in individuals with other chronic diseases. We also examined the relationship between MHI-5 scores and validated measures of general and disease specific health related quality of life. Disease specific quality of life included measures of distress related to urinary, sexual and bowel habits. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with mental health score. RESULTS: Most men studied were Hispanic (51.6%) and had at most a high school education (85.9%). Mean MHI-5 score +/- SD was 68 +/- 23 on a 100-point scale, significantly worse than cohorts of men with diabetes, congestive heart failure and chronic pulmonary disease. Hispanic ethnicity, urinary bother and bowel bother were negatively associated with mental health. Spirituality and physical functioning were positively associated with mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Economically disadvantaged men with prostate cancer report worse mental health than people with other chronic diseases. Patients especially at risk are those with significant urinary or bowel distress, poor physical health, low spirituality and Hispanic ethnicity.

Herbal and vitamin supplement use in a prostate cancer screening population.

OBJECTIVES: To report the observed usage trend of herbal and vitamin supplements in a population of men visiting a prostate cancer screening clinic and its relation to the Sexual Health Inventory for Men score and the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS). METHODS: Men participating in the 2001 and 2002 Prostate Cancer Awareness Week screening for prostate cancer were given a self-administered questionnaire. The questions were designed to gather background health information and to determine the use of prescription medications for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), as well as the use of herbal and vitamin supplements. In addition, the AUA-SS and Sexual Health Inventory for Men score were calculated for each participant in the study. RESULTS: The number of questionnaires completed was 12,457. Of the completed questionnaires, 70% of the participants reported the use of multivitamins, and 21% reported the use of herbal supplements. Ten percent of all men reported the use of prescription medications for LUTS (AUA-SS greater than 15). Of the men reporting the use of prescription medications, 19% were taking finasteride, 17% doxazosin, 20% terazosin, 23% tamsulosin, and 22% other prescription medications. Moreover, the average AUA-SS was greater for the men taking herbs or supplements than for those who did not take herbs or supplements (P <0.001). Nonetheless, the Sexual Health Inventory for Men score did not show a positive correlation between the intake of alternative medications and the severity of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that a substantial proportion of men with LUTS participating in a national prostate cancer screening program were not taking prescription medications for these symptoms. Furthermore, we observed that men taking herbs or vitamin supplements tended to have higher AUA scores. Additional investigation is warranted into the reason some men are not receiving standard prescription medications for LUTS and whether reliance on alternative treatments is playing a role in this phenomenon.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in men with family history of prostate cancer: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) among men with a family history of prostate cancer and to evaluate the relationship between selected sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics and the use of CAMs. METHODS: Unaffected brothers of men diagnosed with prostate cancer were asked to participate in a short computer-assisted telephone interview. The survey focused primarily on the use of different vitamins, herbal supplements, and medications, some of which are marketed for prostate health or prostate cancer prevention. RESULTS: A total of 111 men completed the survey, representing 66% of eligible study subjects. Of the 111 men, 61 (55%) reported currently taking some form of CAM, with 30% taking a vitamin or supplement purported to have prostate-specific benefits. The prevalence of CAM use generally increased with increasing age; however, men who were younger than their affected brother at the time of the diagnosis of prostate cancer were more likely to use CAMs than were older brothers. CONCLUSIONS: Most men with a family history of prostate cancer take vitamins and supplements, some of which are believed to prevent future cancer occurrence. The results of this study and others provide some insight into the determinants of potentially beneficial health behaviors in high-risk individuals.

Use of complementary/alternative medicine by men diagnosed with prostate cancer: prevalence and characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the prevalence of the use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) among a random sample of Ontario (Canadian) men diagnosed with prostate cancer and to explore in what way users of CAM differ from nonusers. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 696 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. RESULTS: The final response rate was 78.8%. Almost one third (29.8%) reported using CAM for their prostate cancer care. Natural health products (most commonly vitamin E, saw palmetto, and selenium) were used by 26.5% of the respondents. CAM therapies were used by 17.0% of the men (most commonly dietary changes), and only 9.1% visited CAM practitioners. Three characteristics appear to differentiate CAM users from nonusers. Men who had attended support groups were much more likely to use CAM. Men who had more advanced disease, and those who believed in the efficacy of CAM, but were not concerned about potential adverse effects of CAM, were also more likely to use CAM. CAM use was not related to education, income, or geographic location. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that CAM use is no longer a phenomenon restricted to a unique segment of the population that is highly educated and enjoys a high family income. CAM use appears to be more related to other factors such as support group attendance, disease characteristics, and beliefs about CAM. Our findings highlight the need for urologists to ask all their patients about their use of CAM.