Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical non-biological therapies for psoriasis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that causes patients psychosocial distress. Topical therapies are utilized for mild-to-moderate disease and for more severe disease in conjunction with systemic therapies. Topical corticosteroids are a cornerstone of treatment for psoriasis, but long-term use can cause stria and cutaneous atrophy and as well as systemic side effects such as topical steroid withdrawal. Non-steroidal topical therapies tend to be safer than topical corticosteroids for long-term use. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a literature review on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of topical therapies for psoriasis. We discuss how the PK and PD characteristics of these therapies inform clinicians on efficacy and toxicity when prescribing for patients. EXPERT OPINION: Topical corticosteroids, used intermittently, are very safe and effective. Long-term, continuous use of topical corticosteroids can cause systemic side effects. Several generic and newly approved non-steroidal options are available, but no head-to-head studies compare the effectiveness of the generics (vitamin D analogs, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus) against the newer therapies (roflumilast, tapinarof). Patients often do not respond to topical therapies due to poor adherence to treatment regimens. For patients resistant to topical treatment, phototherapy or systemic therapy may be an option.

The relationship between medication adherence and complementary medicine use in epilepsy patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to examine the usage of Complementary and Integrated Medicine (CIM) in individuals with epilepsy and the impact of CIM usage on medication adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in a university hospital in northern Turkey between July and October 2023, involving 101 individuals with epilepsy (PWE). Descriptive information forms and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 (MMS-4) were used as data collection tools. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and post-hoc LSD analyses were employed for data evaluation. RESULTS: The participants consisted of 65.3 % males, 25.7 % were not working due to epilepsy, and 61.4 % with generalized epilepsy. The average MMS-4 score was found to be 3.08 ± 0.96. MMS-4 scores showed significant differences based on epilepsy type (F = 3.998, p = 0.021; η2 = 0.07). 76.2 % (n = 21) of the participants who used at least one CIM technique preferred "having a religious person read a prayer." CONCLUSION: Medication adherence in PWE was at a moderate level. Individuals with focal and secondary generalized epilepsy showed better medication adherence compared to those with generalized types. Of those participant who used at least one CIM technique to improve their general health or control seizures, the most common was "having a religious person read a prayer."

Medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes after disability onset: a difference-in-differences analysis using nationwide data.

BACKGROUND: Effectively managing the coexistence of both diabetes and disability necessitates substantial effort. Whether disability onset affects adherence to type 2 diabetes medication remains unclear. This study investigated whether disability onset reduces such adherence and whether any reduction varies by disability type. METHODS: This study used the National Disability Registry and National Health Insurance Research Database from Taiwan to identify patients with type 2 diabetes who subsequently developed a disability from 2013 to 2020; these patients were matched with patients with type 2 diabetes without disability onset during the study period. Type 2 diabetes medication adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR). A difference-in-differences analysis was performed to determine the effect of disability onset on the MPR. RESULTS: The difference-in-differences analysis revealed that disability onset caused a reduction of 5.76% in the 1-year MPR (P < 0.001) and 13.21% in the 2-year MPR (P < 0.001). Among all disability types, organ disabilities, multiple disabilities, rare diseases, and a persistent vegetative state exhibited the largest reductions in 2-year MPR. CONCLUSIONS: Policies aimed at improving medication adherence in individuals with disabilities should consider not only the specific disability type but also the distinct challenges and barriers these patients encounter in maintaining medication adherence.

Adherence and impact of an oral nutritional supplement enriched in leucine, EVOO, EPA and DHA, and beta-glucans on the coverage of energy and protein requirements in patients with cancer and malnutrition: Alisenoc study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an enhanced ONS (enriched in EPA, DHA, leucine, and beta-glucans) on the dietary intake of cancer patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled, and multicenter clinical trial was conducted in patients with cancer and malnutrition. The trial compared prescribed dietary advice and two packs per day, for 8 weeks, of a hypercaloric (400 kcal/pack) and hyperproteic ONS (20 g/pack) with fiber and specific ingredients (leucine, EPA and DHA, and beta-glucans) (enhanced-ONS) versus an isocaloric and isoproteic formula (standard-ONS) without specific ingredients. Food intake was assessed with a 3-day dietary survey, and adherence to the supplement with a patient self-completed diary. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed the intervention period. The combined intervention of dietary advice and ONS managed to increase the energy intake of the overall cohort by 792.55 (378.57) kcal/day, protein by 40.72 (19.56) g/day. Increases in energy and nutrient intakes were observed in both groups, both in dietary intake and associated exclusively with the supplement. The group that received the enhanced-ONS ingested a greater volume of product when there was a greater severity of malnutrition; a tumor location in the head, neck, upper digestive area, liver, or pancreas; more advanced stages of the tumor; or the receipt of more than one antineoplastic treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of an enhanced-ONS helps meet the nutritional requirements of cancer patients, especially those who have a more compromised clinical condition, with high adherence, good tolerance, and acceptance.

Using the 5-Item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) to Screen for Non-adherence to Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation After Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Poor adherence to recommended vitamin and mineral supplementation after bariatric surgery is common and challenging for healthcare professionals to identify. There are several questionnaires for self-reporting of adherence to chronic medication, but none has so far been evaluated for assessment of adherence to vitamin and mineral supplementation after bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the 5-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in measuring adherence to vitamin and mineral supplementation post bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). METHOD: The psychometric properties of MARS-5 for vitamin and mineral supplementation were validated in two cohorts: one at 1 year post bariatric surgery (n = 120) and the other at 2 years post-surgery (n = 211). MARS-5 was compared to pharmacy refill data for vitamin B12 and combined calcium/vitamin D as reference. RESULTS: Correlation analyses demonstrated that the MARS-5 had acceptable validity compared to objectively measured adherence rates from pharmacy refill data (calculated as continuous, multiple-interval measures of medication availability/gaps-coefficient ranged from 0.49 to 0.54). Internal reliability (Cronbach's α) was high: 0.81 and 0.95, respectively. There was a clear ceiling effect where one out of three had a maximum score on MARS-5. CONCLUSION: MARS-5 demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for assessment of adherence to vitamin and mineral supplementation post bariatric surgery.

Adherence and discontinuation of prescription cannabidiol for the management of seizure disorders at an integrated care center.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate adherence, discontinuation rates, and reasons for non-adherence and discontinuation of prescription CBD during the 12-months post-initiation period at an integrated care center. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients prescribed CBD by a neurology clinic provider with initial prescription fulfillment through the center's specialty pharmacy from January 2019 through April 2020. Baseline demographics and reasons for non-adherence and/or discontinuation were collected from the electronic health record and pharmacy claims history was used to calculate adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC). Patients were included in the PDC analysis if they had at least 3 fills during the study period. Non-adherence was defined as a PDC < 0.8. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data with categorical variables represented as frequencies and percentages and continuous variables as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). RESULTS: We included 136 patients with a median age of 14 years (IQR 9 - 21). Most patients were white (n = 115, 85%), with a diagnosis of intractable epilepsy (n = 100, 74%). Among the 128 patients with 3 or more fills, the median PDC was 0.99 (IQR 0.95 - 1.00) with non-adherence seen in 6% (n = 8) of patients. The most common reason for non-adherence was side effects (n = 2, 25%). Prescription CBD was discontinued by 23% (n = 31) of patients with a median time to discontinuation of 117 days (IQR 68 - 216). The most common reason for discontinuation was major side effects (n = 12, 39%). The most common side effects leading to discontinuation were agitation/irritability (n = 4), mood changes (n = 4), aggressive behavior (n = 3), and increased seizure frequency (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Adherence to prescription CBD at an integrated care center was high with approximately 94% of patients considered adherent. Providers and pharmacists may improve adherence and discontinuation rates by educating patients on the timeline of response, potential side effects, and potential for dose adjustments.

Alcohol and drug use severity are independently associated with antiretroviral adherence in the current treatment era.

Substance use in people with HIV (PWH) negatively impacts antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. However, less is known about this in the current treatment era and the impact of specific substances or severity of substance use. We examined the associations of alcohol, marijuana, and illicit drug use (methamphetamine/crystal, cocaine/crack, illicit opioids/heroin) and their severity of use with adherence using multivariable linear regression in adult PWH in care between 2016 and 2020 at 8 sites across the US. PWH completed assessments of alcohol use severity (AUDIT-C), drug use severity (modified ASSIST), and ART adherence (visual analogue scale). Among 9400 PWH, 16% reported current hazardous alcohol use, 31% current marijuana use, and 15% current use of ≥1 illicit drugs. In multivariable analysis, current methamphetamine/crystal use, particularly common among men who had sex with men, was associated with 10.1% lower mean ART adherence (p < 0.001) and 2.6% lower adherence per 5-point higher severity of use (ASSIST score) (p < 0.001). Current and more severe use of alcohol, marijuana, and other illicit drugs were also associated with lower adherence in a dose-dependent manner. In the current HIV treatment era, individualized substance use treatment, especially for methamphetamine/crystal, and ART adherence should be prioritized.

Telephone-based social health screening by pharmacists in the nonadherent Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Unmet social health needs are associated with medication nonadherence. Although pharmacists are well positioned to address medication nonadherence, there is limited experience with screening for and addressing social health needs. OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of social health needs among Medicare patients with higher vs lower social health risk using a predictive model. To also evaluate pre-post changes in medication adherence and health care use following a pharmacist-initiated social health screening. METHODS: A social health screening workflow was implemented into a routine pharmacist adherence program at an integrated health care delivery system. The social health screening was conducted during medication adherence outreach phone calls with Medicare members who were overdue for statin, blood pressure, or diabetes medications. We developed a social health need predictive algorithm to flag higher-risk patients and tested this algorithm against a random subset of lower-risk patients. Screening conversations were guided by a focus group that developed open-ended questions to identify social health needs. Comparisons in social health needs were made between higher- and lower-risk patients. Use and adherence outcomes were compared pre and post for patients who accepted a referral to social health resources and patients who declined a referral. RESULTS: 1,217 patients were contacted and screened for social health needs by pharmacists. Patients flagged by the social risk algorithm were more likely to report social health needs (28.7% vs 12.7% in the unflagged group; P < 0.01). Commonly reported needs included transportation (43%), finances (34%), caregiving (22%), mental health (11%), and food access (10%). 221 patients accepted a referral to a central resource website and call center that connected patients to local services. One year after screening dates, patients who did not accept a referral spent more time in the hospital (mean change +0.7 days, SD = 7.3, P < 0.01), had fewer primary care visits (mean change -0.5 visits, SD = 6.5, P < 0.01), and had a shorter length of membership (mean change -0.4 months, SD = 1.9, P < 0.01). Patients who accepted a referral had increased statin adherence (62.3% adherent pre vs 74.7% post, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We implemented a workflow for pharmacists to screen for social health needs. The social health need prediction model doubled the identification rate of patients who have needs. Intervening on social health needs during these calls may improve statin adherence and may have no adverse effect on health care utilization or health plan membership. DISCLOSURES: Social health risk predictive model development and validation was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ R18HS027343).

Tailored pharmacist-led intervention to improve adherence to Iron supplementation in premature infants: a randomized controlled trial in China.

Introduction: Prematurity is due to a number of factors, especially genetics. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led patient-centered medication therapy management trial on iron deficiency and medication adherence among premature infants receiving iron supplementation at a tertiary hospital in Shaoxing, China. Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, eighty-one premature infants, with or without genetic factors, born at 26 to 30 weeks and 6 days gestational age, will be recruited and randomised to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive a pharmacist-driven discharge counseling on iron supplements from recruitment, until 12 months. The control group will receive care as usual. The main outcomes were haemoglobin (g/L), serum iron (µg/L), medication adherence estimation and differentiation scale, the satisfaction with information about medicines scale, beliefs about medicines questionnaire and the Bayley scales for infant development. Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in the study. After intervention, results for the haemoglobin and serum iron differed significantly between the control group and the intervention group (101.36 vs. 113.55, P < 0.0001 and 51.13 vs. 101.36, P = 0.004). Additionally, there was a substantial difference between the intervention group and the control group in terms of patient medication adherence estimation and differentiation scale (27 vs. 34, P = 0.0002). the intervention group had better mental development index and psychomotor development index, compared with the control group (91.03 vs. 87.29, P = 0.035 and 95.05 vs. 90.00, P = 0.022). Discussion: In premature infants with iron deficiency, our pharmacist-led team significantly improved clinical outcomes and medication adherence.

The development of a clinical nomogram to predict medication nonadherence in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common bone disease in older patients. Medication adherence is of great significance in the prognosis of this disease. Therefore, this study analyzed the high-risk factors that lead to medication nonadherence in patients with KOA and constructed a nomogram risk prediction model. The basic information and clinical characteristics of inpatients diagnosed with KOA at the Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, were collected from January 2020 to January 2022. The Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky scale was used to evaluate medication adherence. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification was performed in combination with the imaging data of patients. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze high-risk factors leading to medication nonadherence, and a prediction model of the nomogram was constructed. The model was internally verified using bootstrap self-sampling. The index of concordance (C-index), area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve, correction curve, and clinical impact curve were used to evaluate the model. A total of 236 patients with KOA were included in this study, and the non-adherence rate to medication was 55.08%. Seven influencing factors were included in the nomogram prediction: age, underlying diseases, diabetes, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI), payment method, painkillers, and use of traditional Chinese medicine. The C-index and AUC was 0.935. The threshold probability of the decision curve analysis was 0.02-0.98. The nomogram model can be effectively applied to predict the risk of medication adherence in patients with KOA, which is helpful for medical workers to identify and predict the risk of individualized medication adherence in patients with KOA at an early stage of treatment, and then carry out early intervention.

Primary medication nonadherence rates to specialty disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis within a health system specialty pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Assessing primary medication nonadherence, the rate at which a medication is prescribed for a patient but is not obtained or replaced with an alternative medication within a reasonable time period, can provide a better understanding of the frequency and impact of these barriers to medication access. Previous literature has reported high rates of primary medication nonadherence, ranging from approximately 20% to 55% in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with specialty disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The high primary medication nonadherence rate may reflect the difficulties associated with obtaining specialty medications, such as high costs, extended prior authorizations, and pretreatment safety requirements. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reasons for and rates of primary medication nonadherence to specialty DMARDs in patients with RA referred to an integrated health systems specialty pharmacy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining eligible patients with a specialty DMARD referral from a health system rheumatology provider to the health system specialty pharmacy. Initially, pharmacy claims were used to identify primary medication nonadherence, defined as the lack of a fill event within 60 days following the medication referral for patients without a specialty DMARD claim in the 180 days prior. Referrals from July 1, 2020, to July 1, 2021, were eligible. Exclusion criteria included duplicate referrals, use for non-RA indications, switches to clinic-administered therapies, and alternate filling methods. Medical record reviews were conducted to confirm referral outcomes. Outcomes included rate of and reasons for primary medication nonadherence. RESULTS: We included 480 eligible patients, 100 of whom had no documented fill event. After medical record review, 27 patients were removed due to having a non-RA diagnosis and 65 patients were removed due to having alternative fill methods, most due to external prescription routing (83.1%). The final primary medication nonadherence rate was 2.1%. Out of the 8 cases of true primary medication nonadherence, 3 patients held specialty DMARD therapy because of other existing disease states, 3 patients were unreachable, and 2 patients were unable to afford medication. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of primary medication nonadherence to specialty DMARDs were low in patients with RA managed by a health system specialty pharmacy. A total of 8 primary medication nonadherence cases were related to safety concerns in non-RA diseases states, patient unreachability, and affordability. However, the limited number of primary medication nonadherence cases limits the generalizability of reasons for primary medication nonadherence found in this study. Key elements of the health systems specialty pharmacy model that likely contribute to low primary medication nonadherence include dedicated financial assistance navigation services, in-clinic pharmacist availability, and open communication between provider offices.

Implementing a text message-based intervention to support type 2 diabetes medication adherence in primary care: a qualitative study with general practice staff.

BACKGROUND: The Support through Mobile Messaging and digital health Technology for Diabetes (SuMMiT-D) project has developed, and is evaluating, a mobile phone-based intervention delivering brief messages targeting identified behaviour change techniques promoting medication use to people with type 2 diabetes in general practice. The present study aimed to inform refinement and future implementation of the SuMMiT-D intervention by investigating general practice staff perceptions of how a text message-based intervention to support medication adherence should be implemented within current and future diabetes care. METHODS: Seven focus groups and five interviews were conducted with 46 general practice staff (including GPs, nurses, healthcare assistants, receptionists and linked pharmacists) with a potential role in the implementation of a text message-based intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Five themes were developed. One theme 'The potential of technology as a patient ally' described a need for diabetes support and the potential of technology to support medication use. Two themes outlined challenges to implementation, 'Limited resources and assigning responsibility' and 'Treating the patient; more than diabetes medication adherence'. The final two themes described recommendations to support implementation, 'Selling the intervention: what do general practice staff need to see?' and 'Fitting the mould; complementing current service delivery'. CONCLUSIONS: Staff see the potential for a text message-based support intervention to address unmet needs and to enhance care for people with diabetes. Digital interventions, such as SuMMiT-D, need to be compatible with existing systems, demonstrate measurable benefits, be incentivised and be quick and easy for staff to engage with. Interventions also need to be perceived to address general practice priorities, such as taking a holistic approach to care and having multi-cultural reach and relevance. Findings from this study are being combined with parallel work with people with type 2 diabetes to ensure stakeholder views inform further refinement and implementation of the SuMMiT-D intervention.

Complementary and alternative medicine use and its association with medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease and other gastrointestinal diseases.

Background: The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) has been embedded in populations for decades. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of their usage among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and their association with adherence to conventional therapies. Methods: In this cross sectional, survey-based study, IBD patients' (n=226) adherence and compliance were evaluated using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. A control sample of 227 patients with other gastrointestinal diseases was included to compare trends of CAM use. Results: Crohn's disease represented 66.4% of those with IBD, with a mean age of 35 ± 13.0 years (54% males). The control group had either chronic viral hepatitis B, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Celiac disease, or other non-IBD diseases, with a mean age of 43.5 ± 16.8 years (55% males). Overall, 49% of patients reported using CAMs (54% in IBD group and 43% in the non-IBD group, P =0.024). Across both groups, the most used CAMs were honey (28%) and Zamzam water (19%). There was no significant association between the severity of the illness and use of CAMs. Patients who used CAMs had a lower adherence to conventional therapies vs. those who did not use CAMs (39% vs. 23%, P =0.038). Using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8, low adherence to medications was reported in 35% of the IBD group vs. 11% of non-IBD group (P = 0.01). Conclusion: In our population, patients with IBD are more likely to use CAMs and are less adherent to medications. Furthermore, the use of CAMs was associated with a lower adherence rate to conventional therapies. Consequently, further studies assessing the causes associated with the use of CAMs and nonadherence to conventional therapies should be explored and interventions designed to mitigate nonadherence.

When can cancer patient treatment nonadherence be considered intentional or unintentional? A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment nonadherence in cancer patients remains high with most interventions having had limited success. Most studies omit the multi-factorial aspects of treatment adherence and refer to medication adherence. The behaviour is rarely defined as intentional or unintentional. AIM: The aim of this Scoping Review is to increase understanding of modifiable factors in treatment nonadherence through the relationships that physicians have with their patients. This knowledge can help define when treatment nonadherence is intentional or unintentional and can assist in predicting cancer patients at risk of nonadherence and in intervention design. The scoping review provides the basis for method triangulation in two subsequent qualitative studies: 1. Sentiment analysis of online cancer support groups in relation to treatment nonadherence; 2. A qualitative validation survey to refute / or validate claims from this scoping review. Thereafter, framework development for a future (cancer patient) online peer support intervention. METHODS: A Scoping Review was performed to identify peer reviewed studies that concern treatment / medication nonadherence in cancer patients-published between 2000 to 2021 (and partial 2022). The review was registered in the Prospero database CRD42020210340 and follows the PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Searches. The principles of meta-ethnography are used in a synthesis of qualitative findings that preserve the context of primary data. An aim of meta-ethnography is to identify common and refuted themes across studies. This is not a mixed methods study, but due to a limited qualitativevidence base and to broaden findings, the qualitative elements (author interpretations) found within relevant quantitative studies have been included. RESULTS: Of 7510 articles identified, 240 full texts were reviewed with 35 included. These comprise 15 qualitative and 20 quantitative studies. One major theme, that embraces 6 sub themes has emerged: 'Physician factors can influence patient factors in treatment nonadherence'. The six (6) subthemes are: 1. Suboptimal Communication; 2. The concept of Information differs between Patient and Physician; 3.Inadequate time. 4. The need for Treatment Concordance is vague or missing from concepts; 5. The importance of Trust in the physician / patient relationship is understated in papers; 6. Treatment concordance as a concept is rarely defined and largely missing from studies. LINE OF ARGUMENT WAS DRAWN: Treatment (or medication) nonadherence that is intentional or unintentional is often attributed to patient factors-with far less attention to the potential influence of physician communication factors. The differentation between intentional or unintentional nonadherence is missing from most qualitative and quantitative studies. The holistic inter-dimensional / multi-factorial concept of 'treatment adherence' receives scant attention. The main focus is on medication adherence / nonadherence in the singular context. Nonadherence that is unintentional is not necessarily passive behaviour and may overlap with intentional nonadherence. The absence of treatment concordance is a barrier to treatment adherence and is rarely articulated or defined in studies. CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates how cancer patient treatment nonadherence is often a shared outcome. An equal focus on physican and patient factors can increase understanding of the two main types of nonadherence (intentional or unintentional). This differentation should help improve the fundamentals of intervention design.

Statin persistence and adherence among older initiators: A nationwide cohort study using the national health insurance claims database in Japan.

PURPOSE: This study clarifies the reality of persistence and adherence to statins in older Japanese people who initiated statin use and compares it between primary and secondary prevention cohorts. METHODS: The nationwide study using the national claims database targeted statin initiators aged ≥55 years from FY2014 to FY2017 in Japan. Persistence and adherence to statins were analyzed overall and according to subgroups based on sex, age stratum, and prevention cohorts. Permissible gap of median days that statins were supplied per prescription to an individual was employed. Persistence rates were estimated as Kaplan-Meier estimates. Poor adherence during persistence was evaluated and defined as <0.8 of the proportion of days covered. RESULTS: Of 3 675 949 initiators, approximately 80% initiated statin use with strong variants. The persistence rate at 1 year was 0.61. Poor adherence to statins during persistence was 8.0% in all patients and this value gradually improved with increasing age. Persistence rate and adherence were lower for the primary prevention cohort than for the secondary prevention cohort, and a notable sex difference was observed for the secondary prevention cohort, which was lower in females but was almost never and slightly observed in the primary prevention cohorts without and with high-risk factors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Many statin initiators discontinued statins shortly following statin initiation but adherence while on statin therapy was good. Attentively watching older patients not to discontinue statins and listening to their reasons for discontinuation are required, especially for initiators in primary prevention and females in secondary prevention.

Use of a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to test contingency management and an integrated behavioral economic and mindfulness intervention for buprenorphine-naloxone medication adherence for opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine-naloxone is a medication shown to improve outcomes for individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, outcomes are limited by low medication adherence rates. This is especially true during the early stages of treatment. METHODS: The present study proposes to utilize a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design to compare two psychological interventions targeting buprenorphine-naloxone adherence: (1) contingency management (CM) and (2) brief motivational interviewing plus substance-free activities session plus mindfulness (BSM). Participants will be N = 280 adults who present to a university-based addictions clinic seeking treatment for OUD. Participants will be randomized to condition to receive 4 sessions of their assigned intervention (CM or BSM). Participants who are adherent, defined as attending physician appointments and having buprenorphine present in urine toxicology, will enter maintenance intervention for an additional 6 months. Those who are not adherent will be re-randomized to receive either the other intervention or both interventions. Follow-up will occur at 8 months post-randomization. CONCLUSIONS: This novel design will examine the benefit of sequential treatment decisions following non-adherence. The primary outcome of this study is buprenorphine-naloxone medication adherence, as assessed by physician visit attendance and presence of buprenorphine in urine. Results will elicit the relative efficacy of CM and BSM compared to one another and whether keeping the initial treatment approach when adding the alternative approach for initially non-adherent individuals is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04080180.

Factors influencing adherence to anti-retroviral therapy in amazonian indigenous people living with HIV/AIDS.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous communities in Peru has been historically affected by high mortality rates attributable to HIV-AIDS infection, associated with a low access to health services, and socio-cultural barriers. In this context, the study aimed to describe factors associated with antiretroviral treatment adherence in people from Awajun and Wampis indigenous communities, living with HIV-AIDS in a Peruvian Amazonian region. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was completed with a consecutive sample of people from indigenous communities (Awajun or Wampis) living with HIV, who were receiving antiretroviral treatment for at least the last three months. Participants were recruited between October 1 and December 30, 2021, from four districts of Bagua and Condorcanqui provinces in the Amazonian region. An ad-hoc questionnaire was used to collect information about demographic, economic, and socio-cultural factors and access to health services. The Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ) was used to evaluate adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with backward stepwise was performed to explore factors that might influence adherence. RESULTS: Of the 208 participants, 28.8% reported complete adherence to antiretroviral treatment. The multivariate logistic regression showed that occupation (aPR: 1.86; 95%CI 1.15-3.02), economic income (aPR: 0.64; 95%CI 0.41-0.99), and adverse reactions to antiretroviral therapy (aPR: 0.36; 95%CI 0.18-0.70) were related to complete adherence to medication. CONCLUSION: Only a third of participants reported complete adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Factors associated with adherence to antiretroviral medication were related to socioeconomic conditions and adverse reactions to the therapeutic scheme. Interventions to improve adherence in indigenous people living with HIV should consider these factors in order to develop effective implementation strategies.

What is the Statin Possession Ratio Cut-Off Which Identifies Those at Increased Risk Following Acute Coronary Syndrome (ANZACS-QI 68)?

AIMS: More optimal dispensing of statins is associated with greater cholesterol lowering; however, it is not known whether this translates to improved outcomes following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to assess the association between various levels of statin adherence and outcomes following ACS. METHODS: Patients hospitalised with ACS who underwent coronary angiography between 2014-2018 were identified from the All New Zealand ACS Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) registry. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to assess statin adherence and calculated over 1 year post-discharge using linked pharmaceutical dispensing datasets. Optimal, adequate and suboptimal adherence was defined as an MPR of ≥1.0, 0.8-0.99 and 0-0.79, respectively. A combined outcome of all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for atherosclerotic disease was identified from 1 year post-discharge through September 2021. Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 30,452 patients, 68% had optimal adherence, 15% adequate adherence and 16% had suboptimal adherence to statins. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years. Those with suboptimal adherence had a higher adjusted risk of the combined outcome compared with those with optimal adherence (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26). There was no significant difference in adjusted outcome between those with optimal and adequate adherence (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal statin adherence following ACS is associated with an increased risk of mortality and rehospitalisation. An MPR cut-off of 0.8 seems reasonable to identify those at higher risk of cardiovascular events that could benefit the most from interventions to improve statin adherence and is appropriate as a target for quality improvement programs.