Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Reprod Health ; 18(1): 47, 2021 Feb 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Integrating family planning into child immunization services may address unmet need for contraception by offering family planning information and services to postpartum women during routine child immunization visits. However, policies and programs promoting integration are often based on insubstantial or conflicting evidence about its effects on service delivery and health outcomes. While integration models vary, many studies measure integration as binary (a facility is integrated or not) rather than a multidimensional and varying continuum. It is thus challenging to ascertain the determinants and effects of integrated service delivery. This study creates Facility and Provider Integration Indexes, which measure capacity to support integrated family planning and child immunization services and applies them to analyze the extent of integration across 400 health facilities. METHODS: This study utilizes cross-sectional health facility (N = 400; 58% hospitals, 42% primary healthcare centers) and healthcare provider (N = 1479) survey data that were collected in six urban areas of Nigeria for the impact evaluation of the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative. Principal Component Analysis was used to develop Provider and Facility Integration Indexes that estimate the extent of integration in these health facilities. The Provider Integration Index measures provider skills and practices that support integrated service delivery while the Facility Integration Index measures facility norms that support integrated service delivery. Index scores range from zero (low) to ten (high). RESULTS: Mean Provider Integration Index score is 5.42 (SD 3.10), and mean Facility Integration Index score is 6.22 (SD 2.72). Twenty-three percent of facilities were classified as having low Provider Integration scores, 32% as medium, and 45% as high. Fourteen percent of facilities were classified as having low Facility Integration scores, 38% as medium, and 48% as high. CONCLUSION: Many facilities in our sample have achieved high levels of integration, while many others have not. Results suggest that using more nuanced measures of integration may (a) more accurately reflect true variation in integration within and across health facilities, (b) enable more precise measurement of the determinants or effects of integration, and (c) provide more tailored, actionable information about how best to improve integration. Overall, results reinforce the importance of utilizing more nuanced measures of facility-level integration.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Administração de Instituições de Saúde , Programas de Imunização , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/organização & administração , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/normas , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Instalações de Saúde/normas , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/métodos , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas de Imunização/provisão & distribuição , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Saúde Reprodutiva/normas , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/normas , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/provisão & distribuição , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
AIDS ; 29 Suppl 2: S129-36, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26102623

RESUMO

The centrality of quality as a strategy to achieve impact within the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has been widely recognized. However, monitoring program quality remains a challenge for many HIV programs, particularly those in resource-limited settings, where human resource constraints and weaker health systems can pose formidable barriers to data collection and interpretation. We describe the practicalities of monitoring quality at scale within a very large multicountry PEPFAR-funded program, based largely at health facilities. The key elements include the following: supporting national programs and strategies; developing a conceptual framework and programmatic model to define quality and guide the provision of high-quality services; attending to program context, as well as program outcomes; leveraging existing and routinely collected data whenever possible; developing additional indicators for judicious use in targeted, in-depth assessments; providing hands-on support for data collection and use at the facility, sub-national, and national levels; utilizing web-based databases for data entry, analysis, and dissemination; and multidisciplinary support from a large team of clinical and strategic information advisors.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Países em Desenvolvimento , Aconselhamento Diretivo , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Administração de Instituições de Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Padrão de Cuidado
4.
Reprod Health ; 11 Suppl 2: S4, 2014 Sep 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25208539

RESUMO

Most of the maternal and newborn deaths occur at birth or within 24 hours of birth. Therefore, essential lifesaving interventions need to be delivered at basic or comprehensive emergency obstetric care facilities. Facilities provide complex interventions including advice on referrals, post discharge care, long-term management of chronic conditions along with staff training, managerial and administrative support to other facilities. This paper reviews the effectiveness of facility level inputs for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. We considered all available systematic reviews published before May 2013 on the pre-defined facility level interventions and included 32 systematic reviews. Findings suggest that additional social support during pregnancy and labour significantly decreased the risk of antenatal hospital admission, intrapartum analgesia, dissatisfaction, labour duration, cesarean delivery and instrumental vaginal birth. However, it did not have any impact on pregnancy outcomes. Continued midwifery care from early pregnancy to postpartum period was associated with reduced medical procedures during labour and shorter length of stay. Facility based stress training and management interventions to maintain well performing and motivated workforce, significantly reduced job stress and improved job satisfaction while the interventions tailored to address identified barriers to change improved the desired practice. We found limited and inconclusive evidence for the impacts of physical environment, exit interviews and organizational culture modifications. At the facility level, specialized midwifery teams and social support during pregnancy and labour have demonstrated conclusive benefits in improving maternal newborn health outcomes. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited to high income countries. Future programs in resource limited settings should utilize these findings to implement relevant interventions tailored to their needs.


Assuntos
Administração de Instituições de Saúde/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna/organização & administração , Assistência Perinatal/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Tocologia/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Assistência Perinatal/normas , Gravidez , Apoio Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA