Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 5958, 2021 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645820

RESUMO

Understanding the functional potential of the gut microbiome is of primary importance for the design of innovative strategies for allergy treatment and prevention. Here we report the gut microbiome features of 90 children affected by food (FA) or respiratory (RA) allergies and 30 age-matched, healthy controls (CT). We identify specific microbial signatures in the gut microbiome of allergic children, such as higher abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and a depletion of Bifidobacterium longum, Bacteroides dorei, B. vulgatus and fiber-degrading taxa. The metagenome of allergic children shows a pro-inflammatory potential, with an enrichment of genes involved in the production of bacterial lipo-polysaccharides and urease. We demonstrate that specific gut microbiome signatures at baseline can be predictable of immune tolerance acquisition. Finally, a strain-level selection occurring in the gut microbiome of allergic subjects is identified. R. gnavus strains enriched in FA and RA showed lower ability to degrade fiber, and genes involved in the production of a pro-inflammatory polysaccharide. We demonstrate that a gut microbiome dysbiosis occurs in allergic children, with R. gnavus emerging as a main player in pediatric allergy. These findings may open new strategies in the development of innovative preventive and therapeutic approaches. Trial: NCT04750980.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/microbiologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/imunologia , Tolerância Imunológica , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/microbiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Bacteroides/isolamento & purificação , Bacteroides/metabolismo , Bifidobacterium longum/isolamento & purificação , Bifidobacterium longum/metabolismo , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Clostridiales/isolamento & purificação , Clostridiales/metabolismo , Alérgenos Animais/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos Animais/imunologia , Ovos/efeitos adversos , Faecalibacterium prausnitzii/isolamento & purificação , Faecalibacterium prausnitzii/metabolismo , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Humanos , Lipopolissacarídeos/biossíntese , Masculino , Leite/efeitos adversos , Leite/imunologia , Nozes/efeitos adversos , Nozes/imunologia , Pólen/química , Pólen/imunologia , Prunus persica/química , Prunus persica/imunologia , Pyroglyphidae/química , Pyroglyphidae/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/imunologia , Urease/biossíntese
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(1): 1-7, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32243591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although occupational contact urticaria (CU) and protein contact dermatitis (PCD) are considered frequent among workers with exposure to proteinaceous materials, data on occupations at risk and the main causes of these occupational skin diseases are relatively limited. OBJECTIVES: To report the causative agents and risk occupations for CU and PCD in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases (FROD). METHODS: We retrieved from the FROD all recognized cases of CU/PCD in the years 2005-2016. RESULTS: With 570 cases, CU and PCD constituted 11% of all recognized cases of occupational skin diseases in the study period. Occupations with the highest incidence of CU/PCD included bakers, chefs and cooks, farmers and farm workers, veterinarians, gardeners, and hairdressers. The most common causative agents were cow dander and flour and grain, followed by natural rubber latex (NRL) and other food. In food-related occupations, wheat and other flours were by far the most common cause of CU/PCD, with 76 cases, whereas fish and other animal-derived food caused 33 and other plant-derived food caused 23 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from the Finnish peculiarity of cow dander allergy, a striking finding was a large share of CU/PCD caused by flours in food handlers as compared to other food.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Proteínas de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Urticária/epidemiologia , Agricultura , Ração Animal/efeitos adversos , Animais , Apium/efeitos adversos , Barbearia , Bovinos , Alérgenos Animais/efeitos adversos , Daucus carota/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Ficus/efeitos adversos , Finlândia , Farinha de Peixe/efeitos adversos , Peixes , Farinha/efeitos adversos , Indústria Alimentícia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Pastinaca/efeitos adversos , Raízes de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Solanum tuberosum/efeitos adversos , Urticária/etiologia , Médicos Veterinários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA