Economic evaluation of a dedicated cardiac resynchronisation therapy preassessment clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Patient evaluation before cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains heterogeneous across centres and it is suspected a proportion of patients with unfavourable characteristics proceed to implantation. We developed a unique CRT preassessment clinic (CRT PAC) to act as a final review for patients already considered for CRT. We hypothesised that this clinic would identify some patients unsuitable for CRT through updated investigations and review. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the CRT PAC led to savings for the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A decision tree model was made to evaluate two clinical pathways; (1) standard of care where all patients initially seen in an outpatient cardiology clinic proceeded directly to CRT and (2) management of patients in CRT PAC. RESULTS: 244 patients were reviewed in the CRT PAC; 184 patients were eligible to proceed directly for implantation and 48 patients did not meet consensus guidelines for CRT so were not implanted. Following CRT, 82.4% of patients had improvement in their clinical composite score and 57.7% had reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15%. Using the decision tree model, by reviewing patients in the CRT PAC, the total savings for the NHS was £966 880. Taking into consideration the additional cost of the clinic and by applying this model structure throughout the NHS, the potential savings could be as much as £39 million. CONCLUSIONS: CRT PAC appropriately selects patients and leads to substantial savings for the NHS. Adopting this clinic across the NHS has the potential to save £39 million.

Health economics for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis of eight skin substitutes.

AIM: Skin substitutes are frequently used to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), and many different options are available. While the clinical efficacy of many products has been evaluated, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the most popular skin substitutes and using the most recent cost data has been lacking. METHODS: This study compared eight skin substitutes using published efficacy rates combined with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2018 cost data. The study criteria resulted in the inclusion of seven studies that described efficacy rates for treatment of DFUs using the skin substitutes. RESULTS: The results revealed wide discrepancies between these skin substitutes for the costs of treatments and healing rates in hospital outpatient departments and physician office settings. Healing rates for 12 and 16 weeks ranged from 28% to 68%, while the average cost for treating one DFU varied from $2001 to $14,507 and $1207 to $8791 in the hospital outpatient department and physician's office setting, respectively. The estimated patient share of costs for treating a single DFU ranged from $400 to $2901 and $241 to $1758 in the hospital outpatient department and physician's office setting, respectively. Most importantly, the estimated number of wounds healed out of 100 DFUs per $1000 expenditure with each patient ranged from 3.9-26.5 DFUs in the hospital outpatient department, and 4.3-36.4 DFUs in the physicians' office setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the costs of a skin substitute itself did not necessarily correlate with its healing efficacy. These results provide a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis to enable integrated health-care systems, health professionals and reimbursement payers to make informed value decisions when treating DFUs.

Mixed effects of restriction strategies in antimicrobial stewardship programs on antimicrobial use in 121 tertiary hospitals in China, 2013-2017.

Background: The research evaluated the impact of intravenous antimicrobial restriction strategy (IARS) on different types of hospitals in China for evidence-based management, for outpatients implemented in 2016. Methods: Based on panel data on antimicrobial use in 121 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang, China, segmented regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of IARS in children's hospitals (CHs), obstetrics and gynecology hospitals (OGHs), women's and children's hospitals (WCHs), traditional Chinese medicine hospitals (TCMHs) and general hospitals (GHs). Antimicrobial use was measured using the percentage of total encounters with prescribing and the percentage of total drug expenditure relating to antimicrobials (APP and AEP). Results: There was a downward baseline slope of APP in all types of hospitals and AEP in WCHs, TCMHs and GHs (P < 0.01). After IARS, a level reduction in AEP in CHs (-3.14%, 95% CI = -6.21 to 0.06), WCHs (-1.33%, 95% CI = -2.44 to 0.22) and TCMHs (-0.85%, 95%CI = -1.51 to 0.18). After IARS, the slope of AEP changed significantly in OGHs (-0.42%, 95%CI = -0.81 to 0.03) and WCHs (0.29%, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.49), and the slope of APP changed significantly in CHs (2.35%, 95%CI = 1.20 to 3.49). Conclusions: IARS had the mixed effects including positive effect in AEP and no significant change in APP, and an unexpected rise in APP in CHs needs further study.

Value co-creation in healthcare: evidence from innovative therapeutic alternatives for hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Our research focuses on the co-creation of value in healthcare with reference to a case of hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE). Our work is mainly based on the concept of value co-creation in healthcare. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an alternative treatment strategy - self-administration - by focusing on treatment outcomes and costs to understand if innovative therapeutic solutions can create value for patients and healthcare systems. METHODS: This paper compares home-based and hospital-based therapeutic strategies (independent of treatment type) with a cost minimization analysis. It encompasses compliance issues and focuses on both payer and societal perspectives, also benefiting from an operationalization of the service-dominant logic model for healthcare delivery. Data were collected over a 6-month period (August 2014-January 2015) through monthly patient interviews. Archival data were used for variable measurement. RESULTS: Thirty-nine out of 62 patients enrolled in the study, experienced at least one HAE attacks, equally distributed between home and hospital-based strategies. No evidence of correlation between therapeutic strategy and disease severity score (p = 0.351), compliance (p = 0.399), and quality of life (p = 0.971), were found. Total direct cost per attack amounts to € 1224 for home-based strategy with respect to € 1454 for hospital-based strategy, with a savings of € 230. The economic advantage of the home-based strategy almost doubles if the societal perspective was considered due to a further savings of €169 (less missed work/school days and no travel expenses). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that home-based therapies represent a feasible strategy for managing C1-INH-HAE and may result in lower costs and increased value for both patients and the healthcare systems. The findings are relevant to the debate on and extend the extant literature to provide a broader view of value co-creation dynamics for home-based therapies in healthcare and their positive effects. The insights are relevant to practitioners and policy makers.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated care program for schizophrenia: an analysis of routine data.

In Germany, a regional social health insurance fund provides an integrated care program for patients with schizophrenia (IVS). Based on routine data of the social health insurance, this evaluation examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the IVS compared to the standard care (control group, CG). The primary outcome was the reduction of psychiatric inpatient treatment (days in hospital), and secondary outcomes were schizophrenia-related inpatient treatment, readmission rates, and costs. To reduce selection bias, a propensity score matching was performed. The matched sample included 752 patients. Mean number of psychiatric and schizophrenia-related hospital days of patients receiving IVS (2.3 ± 6.5, 1.7 ± 5.0) per quarter was reduced, but did not differ statistically significantly from CG (2.7 ± 7.6, 1.9 ± 6.2; p = 0.772, p = 0.352). Statistically significant between-group differences were found in costs per quarter per person caused by outpatient treatment by office-based psychiatrists (IVS: €74.18 ± 42.30, CG: €53.20 ± 47.96; p < 0.001), by psychiatric institutional outpatient departments (IVS: €4.83 ± 29.57, CG: €27.35 ± 76.48; p < 0.001), by medication (IVS: €471.75 ± 493.09, CG: €429.45 ± 532.73; p = 0.015), and by psychiatric outpatient nursing (IVS: €3.52 ± 23.83, CG: €12.67 ± 57.86, p = 0.045). Mean total psychiatric costs per quarter per person in IVS (€1117.49 ± 1662.73) were not significantly lower than in CG (€1180.09 ± 1948.24; p = 0.150). No statistically significant differences in total schizophrenia-related costs per quarter per person were detected between IVS (€979.46 ± 1358.79) and CG (€989.45 ± 1611.47; p = 0.084). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed cost savings of €148.59 per reduced psychiatric and €305.40 per reduced schizophrenia-related hospital day. However, limitations, especially non-inclusion of costs related to management of the IVS and additional home treatment within the IVS, restrict the interpretation of the results. Therefore, the long-term impact of this IVS deserves further evaluation.

What is the best setting for receiving dialysis vascular access repair and maintenance services?

INTRODUCTION: Advances in dialysis vascular access (DVA) management have changed where beneficiaries receive this care. The effectiveness, safety, quality, and economy of different care settings have been questioned. This study compares patient outcomes of receiving DVA services in the freestanding office-based center (FOC) to those of the hospital outpatient department (HOPD). It also examines whether outcomes differ for a centrally managed system of FOCs (CMFOC) compared to all other FOCs (AOFOC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of clinically and demographically similar patients within Medicare claims available through United States Renal Data System (USRDS) (2010-2013) who received at least 80% of DVA services in an FOC (n = 80,831) or HOPD (n = 133,965). Separately, FOC population is divided into CMFOC (n = 20,802) and AOFOC (n = 80,267). Propensity matching was used to control for clinical, demographic, and functional characteristics across populations. RESULTS: FOC patients experienced significantly better outcomes, including lower annual mortality (14.6% vs. 17.2%, p<0.001) and DVA-related infections (0.16 vs. 0.20, p<0.001), fewer hospitalizations (1.65 vs. 1.91, p<0.001), and lower total per-member-per-month (PMPM) payments ($5042 vs. $5361, p<0.001) than HOPD patients. CMFOC patients had lower annual mortality (12.5% vs. 13.8%, p<0.001), PMPM payments (DVA services) ($1486 vs. $1533, p<0.001) and hospitalizations ($1752 vs. $1816, p<0.001) than AOFOC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Where nephrologists send patients for DVA services can impact patient clinical and economic outcomes. This research confirmed that patients who received DVA care in the FOC had better outcomes than those treated in the HOPD. The organizational culture and clinical oversight of the CMFOC may result in more favorable outcomes than receiving care in AOFOC.

Impact of a general practitioner-led integrated model of care on the cost of potentially preventable diabetes-related hospitalisations.

AIM: To estimate potential savings for Australia's health care system through the implementation of an innovative Beacon model of care for patients with complex diabetes. METHODS: A prospective controlled trial was conducted comparing a multidisciplinary, community-based, integrated primary-secondary care diabetes service with usual care at a hospital diabetes outpatient clinic. We extracted patient hospitalisation data from the Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection and used Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups to assign costs to potentially preventable hospitalisations for diabetes. RESULTS: 327 patients with complex diabetes referred by their general practitioner for specialist outpatient care were included in the analysis. The integrated model of care had potential for national cost savings of $132.5 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in hospitalisations attributable to better integrated primary/secondary care can yield large cost savings. Models such as the Beacon are highly relevant to current national health care reform initiatives to improve the continuity and efficiency of care for those with complex chronic disease in primary care.

Effectiveness and efficacy of nutritional therapy: A systematic review following Cochrane methodology.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Disease-related malnutrition has deleterious consequences on patients' outcome and healthcare costs. The demonstration of improved outcome by appropriate nutritional management is on occasion difficult. The European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) appointed the Nutrition Education Study Group (ESPEN-NESG) to increase recognition of nutritional knowledge and support in health services. METHODS: To obtain the best available evidence on the potential effects of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay; cost of malnutrition; effect of nutritional treatment on outcome parameters and pharmaco-economics of nutritional therapy, a systematic review of the literature was performed following Cochrane methodology, to answer the following key questions: Q1) Is malnutrition an independent predictive factor for readmission within 30 days from hospital discharge? Q2) Does nutritional therapy reduce the risk of readmission within 30 days from hospital discharge? Q3) Is nutritional therapy cost-effective/does it reduce costs in hospitalized patients? and Q4) Is nutritional therapy cost effective/does it reduce costs in outpatients? RESULTS: For Q1 six of 15 identified observational studies indicated that malnutrition was predictive of re-admissions, whereas the remainder did not. For Q2 nine randomized controlled trials and two meta-analyses gave non-conclusive results whether re-admissions could be reduced by nutritional therapy. Economic benefit and cost-effectiveness of nutritional therapy was consistently reported in 16 identified studies for hospitalized patients (Q3), whereas the heterogeneous and limited corresponding data on out-patients (Q4) indicated cost-benefits in some selected sub-groups. CONCLUSIONS: This result of this review supports the use of nutritional therapy to reduce healthcare costs, most evident from large, homogeneous studies. In general, reports are too heterogeneous and overall of limited quality for conclusions on impact of malnutrition and its treatment on readmissions.

[What do Interpreters Cost? - A Retrospective Analysis of the Costs for Interpreters in Treatment of Refugees in a Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic in Berlin]. / Was kosten uns Dolmetscher? ­ Eine retrospektive Analyse der Dolmetscherkosten in der Behandlung von Flüchtlingen in einer Psychiatrischen Institutsambulanz in Berlin.

Clinical diagnostics of mental disorders especially among refugees and asylum seekers come with unique difficulties: language barriers, different forms of expression and concepts of the understanding of mental illness as well as a different cultural background. Therefore professional interpreters are needed but associated with a higher effort related to costs and time. We conducted a retrospective analysis of costs, which incurred by the use of professional interpreters in our outpatient clinic in Berlin, Germany, in the first quarter 2016 for the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. The sample consisted of 110 refugees and asylum seekers; the highest costs in the use of interpreters incurred among Neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (53.04%), especially Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (39.04%), as well as affective disorders (38.47%), especially major depressive episodes (25.23%). Our data point out the crucial need of a regulation of costs with regard to the service of professional interpreters in Germany.

Rapid analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy registry data for reimbursement purposes: Technical communication.

OBJECTIVE: To explain how Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Registry (HBOTR) data of the US Wound Registry (USWR) helped establish a fair analysis of the physician work of hyperbaric chamber supervision for reimbursement purposes. METHODS: We queried HBOTR data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, on patient comorbidities and medications as well as the number of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy treatments supervised per physician per day from all hyperbaric facilities participating in the USWR that had been using the electronic medical record (EHR) for more than six months and had passed data completeness checks. RESULTS: Among 11,240 patients at the 87 facilities included, the mean number of comorbidities and medications was 10 and 12, respectively. The mean number of HBO2 treatments supervised per physician per day was 3.7 at monoplace facilities and 5.4 at multiplace facilities. Following analysis of these data by the RUC, the reimbursement rate of chamber supervision was decreased to $112.06. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing HBO2 therapy generally suffer from multiple, serious comorbidities and require multiple medications, which increase the risk of HBO2 and necessitate the presence of a properly trained hyperbaric physician. The lack of engagement by hyperbaric physicians in registry reporting may result in lack of adequate data being available to counter future challenges to reimbursement.

A nurse-led rheumatology clinic versus rheumatologist-led clinic in monitoring of patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis undergoing biological therapy: a cost comparison study in a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for rheumatology nursing management of chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) from European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) states that nurses should take part in the monitoring patients' disease and therapy in order to achieve cost savings. The aim of the study was to compare the costs of rheumatology care between a nurse-led rheumatology clinic (NLC), based on person-centred care (PCC), versus a rheumatologist-led clinic (RLC), in monitoring of patients with CIA undergoing biological therapy. METHODS: Patients with CIA undergoing biological therapy (n = 107) and a Disease Activity Score of 28 ≤ 3.2 were randomised to follow-up by either NLC or RLC. All patients met the rheumatologist at inclusion and after 12 months. In the intervention one of two annual monitoring visits in an RLC was replaced by a visit to an NLC. The primary outcome was total annual cost of rheumatology care. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients completed the RCT at the 12 month follow-up. Replacing one of the two annual rheumatologist monitoring visits by a nurse-led monitoring visit, resulted in no additional contacts to the rheumatology clinic, but rather a decrease in the use of resources and a reduction of costs. The total annual rheumatology care costs including fixed monitoring, variable monitoring, rehabilitation, specialist consultations, radiography, and pharmacological therapy, generated € 14107.7 per patient in the NLC compared with € 16274.9 in the RCL (p = 0.004), giving a € 2167.2 (13 %) lower annual cost for the NLC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CIA and low disease activity or in remission undergoing biological therapy can be monitored with a reduced resource use and at a lower annual cost by an NLC, based on PCC with no difference in clinical outcomes. This could free resources for more intensive monitoring of patients early in the disease or patients with high disease activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered as a clinical trial at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01071447). Registration date: October 8, 2009.

[How to convince the head of department and managing director of the importance of specialised headache clinics]. / Como convencer al jefe de servicio y al gerente de la importancia de las unidades/consultas especializadas de cefaleas.

In spite that headache is, by far, the most frequent reason for neurological consultation and that the diagnosis and treatment of some patients with headache is difficult, the number of headache clinics is scarce in our country. In this paper the main arguments which should allow us, as neurologists, to defend the necessity of implementing headache clinics are reviewed. To get this aim we should first overcome our internal reluctances, which still make headache as scarcely appreciated within our specialty. The facts that more than a quarter of consultations to our Neurology Services are due to headache, that there are more than 200 different headaches, some of them actually invalidating, and the new therapeutic options for chronic patients, such as OnabotulinumtoxinA or neuromodulation techniques, oblige us to introduce specialised headache attendance in our current neurological offer. Even though there are no definite data, available results indicate that headache clinics are efficient in patients with chronic headaches, not only in terms of health benefit but also from an economical point of view.

TITLE: Como convencer al jefe de servicio y al gerente de la importancia de las unidades/consultas especializadas de cefaleas.A pesar de que la cefalea es, con diferencia, el principal motivo neurologico de consulta, y de la complejidad diagnostica y terapeutica de algunos pacientes, el numero de consultas monograficas de cefalea (CC) y de unidades de cefalea (UC) es muy reducido en nuestro pais. En este articulo pasaremos revista a los principales argumentos que nos permitan, como neurologos, defender la necesidad de la implementacion de una CC/UC, dependiendo de la poblacion que se debe atender, en todos nuestros servicios de neurologia. Para ello deberemos, en primer lugar, vencer las reticencias internas, que hacen que la cefalea sea aun poco apreciada y atractiva dentro de nuestra especialidad. El hecho de que la cefalea justifique mas de un cuarto de las consultas a un servicio de neurologia estandar de nuestro pais y de que existan mas de 200 cefaleas diferentes, algunas de ellas realmente invalidantes, y las nuevas opciones de tratamiento para pacientes cronicos, como la OnabotulinumtoxinA para la migraña cronica o las tecnicas de neuromodulacion, obligan a introducir dentro de nuestras carteras de servicios la asistencia especializada en cefaleas. Aunque no disponemos de datos incontrovertibles, existen ya datos suficientes en la literatura que indican que esta atencion es eficiente en pacientes con cefaleas cronicas no solo en terminos de salud, sino tambien desde el punto de vista economico.

Lessons learned from a colocation model using psychiatrists in urban primary care settings.

OBJECTIVES: Comorbid psychiatric illness has been identified as a major driver of health care costs. The colocation of psychiatrists in primary care practices has been proposed as a model to improve mental health and medical care as well as a model to reduce health care costs. METHODS: Financial models were developed to determine the sustainability of colocation. RESULTS: We found that the population studied had substantial psychiatric and medical burdens, and multiple practice logistical issues were identified. CONCLUSION: The providers found the experience highly rewarding and colocation was financially sustainable under certain conditions. The colocation model was effective in identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities.

[Satisfaction with an integrated care program for outpatients with schizophrenia or depression]. / Patientenzufriedenheit mit einem Programm der Integrierten Versorgung für die Indikationen Schizophrenie und Depression.

OBJECTIVE: To study out-patients' perception of an Integrated Care compliance program. METHODS: Survey of patients enrolled in the Integrated Care program "Münchner Modell" in Munich, Germany. RESULTS: N = 121 patients participated in the survey. Overall patients were very satisfied with the Integrated Care program. They reported improvements in several areas of life. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the aspects of routine patient care that still need to be improved and shows how these deficits can be addressed by Integrated Care programs.

[Dermatology day-care: between official rules and reality]. / Hôpital de jour de dermatologie : entre circulaire frontière et réalité

BACKGROUND: Official rules published in 2006 and 2010 concerning ambulatory care rates in France led to artificial redistribution of this activity from day-care hospitalization to consultations. In our dermatological day-care establishment, we compared the financial costs engendered for patients admitted for day-care hospitalization and those seen at consultations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011/01/10 to 2011/02/04, for each patient, we prospectively analyzed the following data: day-care hospitalization or consultation, age, sex, diagnosis, laboratory and radiological examination, non-dermatological consultations, time spent with the patient by doctors (interns, senior doctors) and nurses, with timing by a stop-watch. The hospital cost was the total for medical examinations (official nomenclature), non-dermatological consultations, physicians' and nurses' salaries and establishment overheads (216 €). The hospital revenue regarding the consultation group consisted of the sum of reimbursement for medical examination, dermatological and non-dermatological consultations, and regarding the day-care hospitalization group, the dermatology rate (670 €) or chemotherapy sessions (380 €). Results were compared using a Chi(2) test and a Student's t-test (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included: 67 in the day-care hospitalization group and 60 in the consultation group. Patients in the day-care hospitalization group were older and had significantly more radiological examinations and non-dermatological consultations, but the number of laboratory examinations and skin biopsies did not differ between the two groups. The mean time spent by doctors was similar in both groups but the time spent by senior doctors without the help of interns was significantly greater and longer than the time for a standard consultation. Nurses spent a mean 72 minutes with each hospitalized patient and 35 minutes with consultation patients (P = 0.007). Hospital costs were identical in both groups at around 415 €. The hospital showed a profit for day-care hospitalization patients (252 €) and a loss (244 €) for consultation patients. DISCUSSION: Half of the patients studied were in day-care hospitalization and half were seen in consultations. The high number of bed-ridden patients with bullous pemphigoid accounts for the fact that day-care patients were older. The reasons for the significantly longer time spent by nurses with day-care hospitalized patients were administration and supervision of chemotherapy, skin care and nursing of bed-ridden patients. However, nurses spent 35 min with each consultation patient, justifying the need to maintain the posts of these staff in such day-care units. The availability of physicians for patients with severe dermatoses and the organization of medical examinations in the same place in the same day underscore the need for medical structures like day-care hospitalization. At present, time spent on intellectual work involving reflection is regrettably not taken into account, which is detrimental to this specialty. The hospital was in profit for day hospitalizations while consultations resulted in losses, in particular because of the absence of social security reimbursement of the establishment's overheads. CONCLUSION: Rules are in need of modification in order to allow the treatment of patients with more complicated conditions.

The financial burden of mandibular trauma.

PURPOSE: Patients with mandibular trauma in the greater Seattle region are frequently transferred to Harborview Medical Center (HMC) despite trained providers in the surrounding communities. HMC receives poor reimbursement for these services, creating a disproportionate financial burden on the hospital. In this study we aim to identify the variables associated with increased cost of care, measure the relative financial impact of these variables, and quantify the revenue loss incurred from the treatment of isolated mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients treated at HMC for isolated mandibular fractures from July 1999 through June 2010, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology coding. Data collected included demographics, injury, hospital course, treatment, outcomes, and billing. RESULTS: The study included 1,554 patients. Total billing was $22.1 million. Of this, $6.9 million was recovered. We found that there are multiple variables associated with the increased cost of treating mandibular fractures; 4 variables--length of hospital stay, treatment modality, service providing treatment, and method of arrival--accounted for 49.1% of the total variance in the amount billed. In addition, we found that the unsponsored portion of our patient population grew from 6.7% to 51.4% during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results led to specific cost-efficiency recommendations: 1) perform closed reduction whenever possible; 2) encourage performing procedures with patients under local anesthesia (closed reductions and arch bar removals); 3) provide improved and shared training among the services treating craniofacial trauma; 4) encourage arrival by privately owned vehicle; 5) provide outpatient treatment, when applicable; 6) offer provider incentives to take trauma call; and 7) offer hospital incentives to treat patients and not transfer them.

The health care costs of violence against women.

The aim of this study is to analyze the health care costs of violence against women. For the study, we used a register-based approach where we identified victims of violence and assessed their actual health care costs at individual level in a bottom-up analysis. Furthermore, we identified a reference population. We computed the attributable costs, that is, the excess health care costs for victims compared to an identified reference population of nonvictims. Only costs within the health care sector were included, that is, somatic and psychiatric hospital costs, costs within the primary health care sector and costs of prescription pharmaceuticals. We estimated the attributable health care costs of violence against women in Denmark, using a generalized linear model where health care costs were modeled as a function of age, childbirth, and exposure to violence. In addition we tested whether socioeconomic status, multiple episodes of violence, and psychiatric contacts had any impact on health care costs. We found that the health care costs were about €1,800 higher for victims of violence than for nonvictims per year, driven mostly by higher psychiatric costs and multiple episodes of violence.

[Referrals to dermatology: proportion of banal disorders]. / Demanda derivada a Dermatología: peso de la patología banal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Skin diseases account for a large number of consultations in primary care. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics and cost of referrals from primary care to a dermatology clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of referrals from a primary care health center to a dermatology clinic. The dermatology clinic was situated in the same health center and was attended by a dermatologist from Complejo Hospitalario Universitario in Albacete, Spain. The study was performed on 10 days selected at random between April 21, 2009, and June 26, 2009. The data gathered included age, sex, use of cryotherapy, and diagnostic group. Patients were divided into 4 diagnostic groups: A) benign degenerative disease or trivial disorders whose treatment may not merit involvement of the national health service, B) diseases resolved with a single dermatology consultation at the health center, C) diseases requiring evaluation in hospital-based dermatology outpatients, and D) diseases referred for surgical treatment. RESULTS: Data were gathered on 257 patients with a mean age was 41.18 years and there was a slight female predominance. The majority of patients were in diagnostic group B (53.7%), followed by groups A (19.1%), C (19.1%), and D (8.2%). The total estimated cost of these 257 visits was €29 750.32, of which €5672.24 was for trivial disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The current high prevalence of trivial disorders in the caseload of dermatology clinics by trivial disorders makes it necessary to control referrals from primary care more strictly.

[Who gets how much psychiatric outpatient care and why?]. / Wer erhält wie viel Versorgung in der Institutsambulanz und warum?

AIMS: To elucidate the connections between individual aspects and patients' concerns and the care effort provided in a clinic for the sickest among outpatients. METHODS: Clients of one health insurer were followed for six months (n = 339) in a "Institutsambulanz" or "PIA". All treatment activities, which involved roughly 100,000 working minutes, were recorded. Sociodemographic data, the diagnoses, the individual needs and idiosyncracies, symptoms and case history were noted for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The linear regression model with the best fit (n = 251, r (2) = 0.512, p < 0.001) included six variables. Lower efforts: living in nursing home (beta = - 0.319; p < 0.001), higher age (beta = - 0.238; p < 0.001), legal incapacity (beta = - 0.165, p = 0.006), own work income (beta = - 0.100; p = 0.044); higher efforts: inpatient stays prior to study treatment (lifetime: beta = 0.181; p = 0.001; number of days in last two years: beta = 0.193; p < 0.001). Treatment aims, functional deficits, and diagnoses did not have a significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients who wish for an independent life despite of a grave psychiatric disorder may effectuate higher treatment efforts. Treatments administered to nursing-home inhabitants are far less complex, although these patients are even sicker. The current reimbursement mechanism may serve as a disincentive towards care administration according to individual need.