Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 32: 248-52, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27290983

RESUMO

We report the case of a 17-month-old child who underwent laparotomy under general anesthesia and caudal block. Electrocardiogram ST-T changes were observed after local anesthetic injection. The prompt use of Intralipid 30% was successful in normalizing ECG alterations. Our experience is consistent with previous literature, mainly carried out in adults. Thereby, we conduct a brief review of the subject in pediatrics. As a major conclusion, we strongly recommend the "fast-track" lipid rescue as soon as this severe complication is detected.


Assuntos
Anestesia Caudal/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/análogos & derivados , Emulsões Gordurosas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Bupivacaína/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lactente , Levobupivacaína , Masculino , Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Can J Anaesth ; 57(12): 1102-10, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20845015

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical update is to identify the best evidence when selecting a long-acting local anesthetic agent for single-shot pediatric caudal anesthesia in children. METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and Medline (OVID) using the terms "caudal" and combinations of at least two of "bupivacaine", "ropivacaine", and "levobupivacaine". The search limits included "randomized controlled trials" (RCTs), "meta-analysis", "evidence-based reviews" or "reviews", "human", and "all child: 0-18 yr". Seventeen RCTs were identified that concerned single-shot pediatric caudal anesthesia with at least two of the three drugs in question. Data were extracted for the areas of clinical efficacy and side effects. Study findings were assigned levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were made according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS: The three drugs investigated were found to be equivalent in terms of efficacy. Evidence showed bupivacaine with the highest incidence of motor block and ropivacaine with the lowest. Adverse effects were rare and unrelated to the choice of drug. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: None of the three agents was shown to be superior in terms of efficacy. Bupivacaine is preferred if motor block is desired, ropivacaine is preferred if motor block is to be minimized. Adverse effects in human studies are rare, mild, and unrelated to the choice of drug. Despite encountering the absence of serious adverse events in each of the studies reviewed, it is noted that animal studies suggest a safer profile with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine than with bupivacaine.


Assuntos
Anestesia Caudal/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Amidas/administração & dosagem , Amidas/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Caudal/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/análogos & derivados , Criança , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Levobupivacaína , Ropivacaina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA