Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on pain perception during anesthetic puncture of dental local anesthesia: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic puncture is often related to the experience of pain. This study aimed to systematically analyze the literature on changes in pain perception during the anesthetic puncture of dental local anesthesia after Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in eight primary databases (Embase, LILACS, BBO, LIVIVO, MedLine via PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science) and three additional ones (EASY, Google Scholar, and OATD) to partially capture the "gray literature". The PICO strategy was used to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating the analgesic effect of PBMT in the anesthetic puncture site of dental local anesthesia compared to placebo or control groups, without restrictions on publication language and year. Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the individual risk of bias of the eligible studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool version 2.0. RESULTS: The electronic search found 3,485 records, of which eight met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The studies were published from 2011 to 2022. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias. PBMT groups showed no significant difference in pain scores compared to placebo and control groups of most studies. CONCLUSION: Based on a low to very low certainty of evidence, PBMT seems to have no effect on pain perception during anesthetic puncture in patients undergoing dental local anesthesia.

The prophylactic effect of photobiomodulation therapy on pain perception due to infiltration injection: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: Fear of pain in dentistry especially the injection involved in most of the processes has always been an important issue preventing the patients from consulting a dentist at the right time. This study aims to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation therapy on reduction of pain in infiltration injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This trial is a crossover study including 30 patients. The patients are divided into two groups (laser therapy in the first period and placebo effect in the next period or vice versa with split-mouth design) using the covariate adaptive randomization method. All the patients received bilateral maxillary canine anesthesia in two periods performed with an ICT injection device (amount of anesthesia solution loaded: 1.8 mL) at a speed of 1 mL/min and a temperature of the solution of 37 °C. In each period, patients received either a prophylactic dose of 940-nm laser (500 mW, 10 J/cm2) or its placebo effect before the injection. The degree of pain perception after each sort of treatment is evaluated by both SEM (Sound, Eye, Motor, and Pain) and VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scales. RESULTS: According to analysis, all the patients scored a VAS scale under 3 in the period they received intervention. Also considering the SEM scale, most of the patients scored 0 in the intervention period. No adverse effect was reported during or after the process. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a significant effect of photobiomodulation on reducing pain perception during infiltration injection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This method can be useful in order to lower the pain for the patients consulting a dentist and therefore facilitate consulting at early stages of the dental issues. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number (date) of the clinical trial in a Primary Registry in the WHO Registry Network is IR.ARAKMU.REC.1398.248(13/03/2020). The related URL is https://en.irct.ir/trial/45362 .

Efficacy of the TuttleNumbNow Intraosseous Method for Pulpal Anesthesia in the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies on intraosseous (IO) anesthesia as a primary injection have shown high success rates. The TuttleNumbNow (TNN; Orem, UT) is a new primary IO injection technique that has not been scientifically evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective randomized, crossover study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of the TNN IO technique using the Septoject Evolution needle (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France) compared with buccal infiltration for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular first molars. METHODS: One hundred four healthy subjects were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups separated by at least 2 weeks. One set of injections consisted of buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar using 1.8 mL 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine followed by a mock TNN injection distal to the mandibular first molar. The other set of injections was a mock buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar followed by a TNN injection of 1.8 mL 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine distal to the mandibular first molar. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the mandibular first molar, which had a 42% anesthetic success rate (highest 80 reading) with buccal infiltration compared with 49% with the TNN, no statistically significant difference in success was observed (P = .2115). CONCLUSIONS: The TNN technique has been advocated as an IO injection. However, the inability to deliver anesthetic solution to the cancellous bone resulted in an anesthetic success rate of 49%. The success was statistically similar to a buccal infiltration (42%) and would not provide adequate pulpal anesthesia as a primary injection.

Comparison of computer controlled local anesthetic delivery and traditional injection regarding disruptive behaviour, pain, anxiety and biochemical parameters: a randomized controlled trial.

The study herein evaluated the effects of infiltrative anesthesia administered via different ways. Resultantly, the pain and anxiety were monitored using psychometric, physiological and biochemical methods. Sixty children aged 7-11 years (8.73 ± 1.38) were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups (n = 30): Traditional injection (control group), and computer controlled local analgesic delivery (CCLAD) (study group). Pulse, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and salivary cortisol levels were recorded, and the scales data (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Wong-Baker Faces Rating Pain Scale (WBS), Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) and Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale (FLACC)) were evaluated. The data were statistically analyzed. Age and gender had not much impact on the measured parameters (p > 0.05). SpO2 values in both groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Pulse, VAS, WBS, MCDAS, FLACC and salivary cortisol values were increased after the anesthesia in control group (p < 0.05). WBS, MCDAS, FLACC and salivary cortisol values were decreased after the anesthesia in study group compared to the control (p < 0.05). It was inferred that computer controlled local analgesic delivery system could be preferred in pediatric patients because of reduced pain and anxiety.

Survey investigation of articaine use in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia is an essential component of dentistry, but there is limited quantifiable understanding of what techniques and local anesthetic solutions are used by practicing dentists. Use of the local anesthetic articaine has been highly debated in dentistry regarding its efficacy and risks for paresthesia. The aims of this study were to expand the knowledge of local anesthesia practices of dentists in the United States through a large-scale survey and associate potential influencing factors regarding articaine use specifically. METHODS: The 23-item survey was sent to 10,340 practicing dentists in the United States, gathering demographic data and local anesthesia approaches and concerns. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1,128 dentists completed the survey. Previous experience with articaine was reported by 97.6% of respondents, with 3.3% no longer using articaine. Sixty percent of respondents indicated using articaine for most local anesthetic injections administered. Multivariable regression analysis found those reporting to use articaine for all local anesthetic injections involving vasoconstrictors were more likely to be male (odds ratio, 1.59; P = .002) or general dentists (odds ratio, 1.63; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Articaine has a perceived benefit to practitioners as most respondents reported using articaine as their primary local anesthetic. A practitioner's sex and type were found to affect the profile of use of articaine. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Assembling evidenced-based local anesthesia practices would be beneficial to ensure US practitioners are more standardized in administering local anesthetics, particularly articaine, in the safest and most efficacious way.

Success of Pulpal Anesthesia Following Buccal Infiltration of the Maxillary First Molar With 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine: A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, randomized crossover study was to compare the peak incidence of success, onset, and incidence over time of pulpal anesthesia in maxillary first molars following a buccal infiltration of 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine. METHODS: A total of 118 adults received 1.8 mL or 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100 000 epinephrine via buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar at 2 separate appointments. Electric pulp testing (EPT) of the maxillary first molar was performed over 68 minutes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the peak incidence of anesthetic success (85% and 92%, respectively) in the maxillary first molar between 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL. The difference in onset times (4.5 min for 1.8 mL vs 4.4 min for 3.6 mL) was not statistically significant. However, the 3.6-mL volume did produce a significantly higher incidence of pulpal anesthesia from minutes 48 to 68 compared with the 1.8-mL volume. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in peak incidence or onset of pulpal anesthesia in the maxillary first molar between 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of articaine with epinephrine. The incidence of pulpal anesthesia was significantly higher with 3.6 mL of articaine at 48 minutes and beyond, but neither volume provided complete pulpal anesthesia for all subjects that lasted at least 60 minutes.

Reliability of the electric pulp tester as an indicator of pulpal anesthesia in primary maxillary posterior teeth to assess the need for supplemental injections: An observational clinical study.

Background: The primary maxillary molars occasionally remain sensitive during operative procedures even post the buccal supraperiosteal injection. This could be due to the widely flared palatal roots receiving accessory innervation from the palatal nerves. Identifying inadequate anesthesia upfront using the electric pulp test (EPT) would give vital information to the clinician on the need of a supplemental palatal injection. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate the reliability of the EPT as an indicator of pulpal anesthesia in primary maxillary molars. Methodology: Fifty one primary maxillary molars were subjected to the EPT following a buccal supraperiosteal injection. During the operative procedure, the " Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability" (FLACC) scores were recorded. The outcome of the EPT was correlated with the results of the FLACC score using Pearson's Chi-square test.Results: The EPT results were correlated to the FLACC scores. Five out of the 10 primary maxillary second molars which responded to the EPT scored 0 on the FLACC scale. The remaining 5 teeth scored 1 on the FLACC scale. The P value was 0.056 which was not statistically significant. This infers that the EPT is not a reliable tool to assess the adequacy of pulpal anesthesia in primary maxillary second molars. Conclusion: From the results of the present study, it can be concluded that the EPT is not a reliable tool to be used as an indicator of pulpal anesthesia in primary maxillary molars.

A comparative assessment of efficacy and preference between needleless device INJEX and insulin syringe for anesthetizing primary maxillary teeth in children aged 4-9 years: A split-mouth crossover randomized clinical study.

insulin syringe for anesthetizing primary maxillary teeth in children aged 4-9 years. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical study included 46 children aged 4-9 years. The patients were digitally allotted to receive 4% articaine for extractions of primary maxillary teeth, either using needleless device INJEX or insulin syringe on each side of the maxillary arch, in two different appointments after a 1-week washout period. Pain perception was measured by the subjective (Faces Pain Scale-Revised [FPS-R]) and objective pain scores (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability [FLACC]) and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and oxygen saturation) during LA administration and during extractions. After the second appointment, children were asked about their preference between needleless device INJEX and insulin syringe. Results: On evaluating subjective pain scores with FPS-R, intergroup differences between the INJEX and insulin syringe groups were found statistically insignificant, both during LA administration (P = 0.101) and extraction (P = 0.080). However, on assessing pain objectively during extraction using FLACC, the mean pain score was less with insulin syringe (2.78) as compared to INJEX (4.72) and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in patient preference between the two methods. Conclusion: Pain perception was minimal during local anesthesia administration using needleless device INJEX; however, its clinical efficacy during extractions was reported to be lower than insulin syringe. Background: Managing pain in children is the most challenging task as it forms the foundation for instilling positive behavior toward dental treatment. Adequate local anesthesia (LA) is the cornerstone of pain management. However, the fear of needles, particularly in young children, can result in complete avoidance and refusal of treatment. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and preference between needleless device INJEX and.

Effects of photobiomodulation with different application parameters on injection pain in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has gained increasing interest due to its effectiveness in pain reduction in various fields of dentistry. However, the number of studies evaluating the effect of PBM on injection pain in children is very limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of PBM with three different application parameters (doses) + topical anesthesia on reducing injection pain and to compare these results with the placebo PBM + topical anesthesia in children during supraperiosteal anesthesia administration. 160 children were randomly divided into 4 groups, 3 experimental and 1 control, with 40 subjects in each. In the experimental groups, before the anesthesia administration, PBM with a power of 0.3 W was applied for 20, 30 and 40 s in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In group 4, a placebo application of laser was performed. The pain felt during the injection was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (PRS), and also the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the data (p < 0.05). The mean FLACC Scale pain scores were 3.02 ± 2.93, 2.92 ± 2.54, 2.12 ± 1.89 and 1.77 ± 1.90 for the placebo group, and Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Furthermore, the mean PRS scores were 1 ± 1.03, 0.95 ± 0.98, 0.80 ± 0.822 and 0.65 ± 0.921 for the placebo group, and Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The "no pain response" rate was higher in Group 3 as compared to Groups 1, 2, and placebo according to the FLACC Scale and PRS; however, no difference was found between the groups (p = 0.109, p = 0.317). Injection pain in children did not differ with placebo and PBM applied with a power of 0.3 W for 20, 30 and 40 s.

Evaluating the effect of using anti-stress balls as a distraction technique in reducing pain during inferior alveolar nerve block injection: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of using anti-stress balls in reducing patients' pain during injection of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 32 individuals were divided into two groups. The conventional method of anesthesia injection was performed using IANB conventional injection technique. During the injection, individuals in the anti-stress ball group were asked to use the anti-stress ball as a distraction technique. For the control group, no supersede methods were used for pain control. Finally, both groups were asked to record their pain utilizing the numerical rating scale (NRS). The participants' vital signs were monitored before and after injection. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent T-test, and Fisher's exact chi-square test were performed for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Sixteen females and 16 males in the age range of 40 to 20 years old participated in this study. The mean pain score in the anti-stress ball group was significantly lower (p < 0.001). In both sexes, the pain score in the anti-stress ball group was significantly lower (males p < 0.001 and females p = 0.001). In addition, in all age ranges, the pain score in the control group was higher except for the above 35 years old participants (p = 0.078). Moreover, there were no significant differences in individuals' vital signs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Utilizing an anti-stress ball reduces patients' pain significantly during IANB in both sexes and individuals who are below 35 years without changing vital signs. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT20220815055704N1.

Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Local anesthesia is performed in dentistry before clinical procedures to avoid pain. Children can show fear at the sight of the needle and pain at its insertion. To make local anesthesia more comfortable, the use of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems has been developed to control the flow rate of the anesthetic solution injected through the needle. The aim of the present research is to evaluate and compare the discomfort felt by patients using a traditional syringe and the CCLAD system SleeperOne®, by considering pain, size sensation, bitterness, and vomit. 30 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to traditional anesthesia or CCLAD. After injection, patients were assessed for the abovementioned outcomes. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 scores was used. As far as pain is concerned, statistically lower mean values were found in the Trial group (p < 0.05). Instead, concerning size, bitterness and vomit perceptions, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (p > 0.05). Linear regressions were calculated considering technique, quadrant, dental arch, tooth, dentition, sex, and age as independent variables. The technique has shown to have a significant influence on pain (p < 0.05), with lower values for SleeperOne® device. Pain resulted significantly influenced by the type of dentition (p < 0.05), with higher scores for deciduous one. Moreover, perceived pain decreased with the increase of the age of patients (p < 0.05). At last, bitterness perception scores resulted to be higher for primary first molars (p < 0.05). SleeperOne® device seems to be a valid support for the reduction of pain related to anesthetic injection, especially in children. Further studies should evaluate CCLADs' uses combined with lidocaine preanesthetic as well as with conscious sedation through nitrous oxide in order to determine possible synergistic effects between these procedures.

A pilot study of local anesthesia training using a mixed-reality haptic fidelity model.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: One of the most difficult local anesthetic blocks to master in dentistry is the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). Historically, dental students have practiced local anesthesia on one another. At the University of Colorado, these practice sessions have been limited to one required laboratory session. The predictability and confidence of student IANB success have not been high in the past. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of a novel IANB simulator, built on a three dimensional (3D)-printed mixed-reality haptic model, for second-year dental students to practice on prior to their laboratory session. METHODS: Thirty-nine student participants volunteered to practice with the IANB simulator. Participants were divided into two groups, Group A and Group B. Self-reported confidence and injection-specific accuracy were measured during IANB simulator practice and the laboratory session. During lab, partner numbness was assessed as a measure of IANB success. Groups A (n = 20) and B (n = 19) practiced with the simulator before and after laboratory, respectively. Injection domains were not assessed during Group B's practice with the IANB simulator. RESULTS: Self-reported confidence increased for both groups (p < 0.001). However, for anesthetic success, Group A exhibited significantly greater success (52.6%) than Group B (17.6%) (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Self-reported confidence in performing an IANB improved and higher anesthetic success was achieved for Group A. Further investigation is necessary to determine the long-term impact of using the IANB simulator in dental education.

Effectiveness of Aculief acupressure device on pain perception during local anesthesia in children: A double-blinded study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Aculief acupressure device on the reduction of pain during local anesthesia (LA) in children and to compare it with the cryotherapy technique. METHODOLOGY: 20 children of age group between 6 and 9 years, requiring pulpectomy or extraction bilaterally were chosen for the study. After ethical clearance and parental consent, children who were not experienced to prior local anesthesia were chosen for the study. A split-mouth study design was done to avoid bias, and children were divided into two groups. During the first visit cryotherapy application was done on any one side followed by the LA, and during the second visit Aculief acupressure application was done, which was followed by the LA. The objective and subjective evaluation of pain during the LA was carried out and analyzed. RESULTS: The objective perception of pain was evaluated using the Sound-Eye-Motor Scale by an observer who was blinded, and the subjective perception of pain by the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale was evaluated by the child patient. The statistical analysis and comparison of values were done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The pain during administration of LA was eliminated after the application of the Aculief acupressure device, and the results were superior to the cryotherapy technique. CONCLUSION: The Aculief acupressure device can be effectively used to eliminate pain perception while administering LA in children. It is a simple, safe, noninvasive, and effective device and is easy to perform.

Comparison of pain perception between computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery and the conventional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block in children.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia (LA) is commonly used for pain control in clinical dental practice. However, it is often perceived as the most painful part of the treatment and the factor leading to the avoidance of dental care. Hence, research on better means of pain management is being conducted. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare pain perception using the No Pain III™ computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery (CCLAD) system and the conventional syringe, for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty children aged 6-12 years were included in the study. Children were randomly allocated into 2 groups by the flip of a coin. Group A received LA by conventional syringe and group B received LA by No Pain III™, on the contralateral side. Physiological parameters including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were assessed at baseline, during the deposition and after the deposition of LA. A subjective evaluation of pain perception was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS). The measured values were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed between group A and group B for pain perception using the WBS, systolic BP and RR. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the No Pain III™ CCLAD system resulted in reduced pain perception and better acceptance when compared to the use of the conventional syringe, for IANB in children.

[Aspiration test as dental anesthesia safety criterion]. / Aspiratsionnyi test kak kriterii bezopasnosti obezbolivaniya v stomatologii.

Intravascular anesthetic injection can lead to acute toxic reaction even the minimal dose of the drug was administered. The aspiration test is a generally accepted standard for local anesthesia in medicine, specially designed to reduce the risk of emergency conditions. Medical instruments should be adapted for aspiration test, the local anesthetic carpule should have a retention notch, and the dental syringe plunger need to have retention elements. The aspiration test protocol may vary. For legal protection of the doctor the aspiration test result should be described in the patient's medical record.

Local Anesthetic Efficacy in Marijuana Users and Nonusers: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the common clinical impression that patients with a history of drug use are challenging to anesthetize with local anesthesia, literature on this clinical phenomenon is sparse. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if differences in local anesthetic efficacy for dental treatment exist between marijuana users and nonusers. METHODS: Subjects were healthy adult males and females who qualified as either chronic marijuana users or nonusers. All subjects had an asymptomatic, vital maxillary lateral incisor that responded to an electric pulp test (EPT). A standard maxillary infiltration injection technique was employed using 1.7 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the test tooth, and the tooth was tested with an EPT at 3-minute intervals. RESULTS: A total of 88% of nonusers (15/17) and 61% of users (11/18) were successfully anesthetized, defined as anesthesia onset within 10 minutes and lasting at least 15 minutes. The difference in the proportion of anesthetized subjects was not statistically significant (P = .073). For subjects with successful anesthesia, there was no significant difference between nonusers and users in the onset or duration of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in local anesthetic efficacy with respect to local anesthetic success, onset, or duration of action were found between chronic marijuana users and nonusers. However, larger studies are likely needed to provide more definitive evidence.

Evaluation of the Injection Pain with the Use of Vibraject during Local Anesthesia Injection for Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

AIM: To compare the outcomes of the conventional syringe and the outcomes of the vibraject-assisted injection (VAI) in terms of the pain of the needle insertion during various intraoral injections of local anesthesia in children aged 6-9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 75 children aged 6-9 years were selected from patients visiting the pediatric dental clinic at Damascus University. The children were assigned into three equal groups (25 children each) according to the type of intraoral injection needed for the treatment: Groups [Group I: received upper buccal infiltrations (UBI), Group II: received posterior palatal infiltrations (PPI), and Group III: received inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)]. This study was conducted considering the split-mouth design. Each child was subjected to both anesthetic injections: the conventional and the vibration-assisted in two separate dental visits 2 weeks apart. At each clinic visit, subjective and objective pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. RESULTS: Children who received local anesthesia using the Vibraject method had lower VAS and FLACC scores than those who received local anesthesia using the conventional method. CONCLUSION: Vibraject was more effective in reducing the pain with local anesthetic injection compared to the conventional injection technique in clinical dental procedures for children. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In a pediatric dental clinic, pain management is considered a pillar that influences actions. Using the VAI may achieve the ease, cooperation, and compliance during the dental care session.

Evaluation of the effect of the photobiomodulation therapy on the pain related to dental injections: A preliminary clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain from dental injections is a common reason why people fear dentistry and avoid dental treatment. Thus, researchers have attempted to find methods to decrease dental injection pain. OBJECTIVES: Considering the analgesic effect of the photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PBMT on the pain caused by dental anesthetic injections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized, split-mouth, triple-blind clinical trial evaluated 60 bilateral canine teeth in 30 dental students. After the random selection of the test (laser) quadrant, the injection site was irradiated with a 940 nm diode laser. Buccal infiltration anesthesia was then administered by injecting lidocaine plus epinephrine with a short needle. The level of pain experienced during the injection was determined using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale (VAS). The same procedure was performed for the control (no laser) quadrant, with the difference being that the laser handpiece was turned on, but no radiation was administered. The 2 groups were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean VAS pain scores were 21.2 ±15.7 for the laser quadrant and 27.9 ±18.9 for the control quadrant; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.030), but did not seem to be clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: The photobiomodulation therapy prior to dental anesthetic injections has no clinical advantage for reducing injection pain.

Pain perception in paediatric patients: evaluation of computerised anaesthesia delivery system vs conventional infiltration anaesthesia in paediatric patients.

Aim: The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of a computerised system (QuickSleeper) compared to traditional syringe in injection of local anaesthetic focusing on the perception of anxiety and pain in paediatric patients. Methods: Study design: 100 children aged between 3 and 15 years in need of two dental treatments that required local anaesthesia were selected and treated randomly but alternately with computerised and traditional local anaesthesia. After each anaesthetic injection, patient's anxiety was measured using the Venham test. Results: Electronic anaesthesia showed statistically significant better results than traditional anaesthesia according to the Venham pain scale, in both mandibular and maxillary sites. Statistics: Data were analysed using the paired Wilcoxon test. Conclusion: The computer-assisted anaesthesia system resulted in a significantly lower pain perception score and yielded to helpful, cooperative behaviour. For this reason, it is an advantageous alternative to traditional injection anaesthesia and can avoid invasive treatments and trauma for young patients.

Jet injection needle-free dental anaesthesia: Initial findings.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated patient preference and reported levels of anxiety and discomfort of participants treated with a new needle-free electric motor-driven device vs. conventional local anaesthetic for dental extractions in a proof-of-principle study. Healing and response of gingival tissues to injection were also evaluated at 1, 3- and 7-days post-procedure. METHODS: After informed consent, eight participants who required bilateral maxillary extractions were included in the trial. The side and order of placement for the needle-free and conventional anaesthetic were randomized. The same operator delivered anaesthesia and ensured teeth were anaesthetized on both sides. Another operator, unaware of order and type of anaesthesia placed, performed the extractions. RESULTS: Participant's average discomfort scores were low for both techniques, and lower for the needle-free injection at all timepoints. Needle-free local anaesthesia was the preferred technique by most participants at most timepoints. The average volume of anaesthetic dispensed was similar between techniques. Successful anaesthesia with the needle-free device was achieved in 6 out of 8 participants. Healing of the extraction sockets and adjacent oral mucosa progressed normally for all participants, with no evidence of infection, trauma or hematoma in the injection sites of the test and conventional sides. CONCLUSIONS: The needle-free local anaesthetic technique investigated achieved sufficient anaesthesia for tooth extractions in the maxilla in 75% of the subjects. A larger clinical trial is needed to further validate the technique tested and to investigate whether needle-free local anaesthesia can be successfully applied to the provision of restorative therapy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study can be used by clinicians treating patients who suffer from dental anxiety and needle-phobia.