Evidencia científica del tratamiento ortopodológico en pie afectado por artritis reumatoide / Evidence of orthopodiatric treatment affected by rheumatoid arthritis on foot

Antecedentes: La artritis reumatoide afecta más a mujeres. La prevalencia en nuestro país es de 0.5%. Se debe abordar mediante un equipo multidisciplinar. Los signos característicos en el pie son sinovitis de las articulaciones, entesitis, nódulos reumatoides y vasculitis. Las modalidades de tratamiento conservador son: ortesis, calzado, estiramientos, terapia manual e incluso ejercicios terapéuticos mediante Tai-chi. Objetivos: Valorar la evidencia científica sobre el tratamiento conservador del pie reumático mediante ortesis plantares y calzado terapéutico. Conocer los últimos avances y que opción es la más indicada para tratar esta patología que afecta al pie. Material y métodos: Se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica de los últimos 15 años en Pubmed. Resultados: Se ha encontrado relación entre el dolor de antepié, subluxación metatarsofalángica y erosión del cartílago articular con el aumento de presión a nivel metatarsal plantar lo que justifica la realización de tratamiento ortopodológico encaminado a reducir la misma. El tratamiento conservador está enfocado a la utilización de ortesis y de zapato terapéutico para mejorar el dolor, la marcha y la funcionalidad. Hay evidencia científica para tratar la metatarsalgia con diferentes tipos de ortesis, que no solo ayudan a mejorar el dolor sino que además reducen el nº de articulaciones inflamadas. La combinación con zapato terapéutico con o sin modificaciones externas produce mejores resultados. Conclusión: Existe escasa evidencia científica sobre el uso de tratamiento ortopodológico para el pie reumático pero se han encontrado algunos artículos que avalan su eficacia, por lo que es imprescindible realizar estudios en este campo (AU)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis affects more women. The prevalence in our country is 0.5%. It should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Characteristic foot signs' are synovitis of joints, enthesitis, rheumatoid nodules and vasculitis. The conservative treatment modalities are: orthotics, footwear, stretching, manual therapy and therapeutic exercises even by Tai-chi. Objectives: To evaluate the scientific evidence on the conservative treatment of rheumatoid foot with orthotics and therapeutic footwear. Aware of progress and that is the most suitable option for treating this disease that affects the feet. Material and methods: We carried out a literature review of the past 15 years in Pubmed. Results: We found the relationship between pain forefoot metatarsophalangeal subluxation and erosion of articular cartilage with increasing pressure to plantar metatarsal level which justifies conducting orthosis treatment aimed at reducing it. Conservative treatment is aimed at the use of orthoses and shoe therapy to improve pain, gait and functionality. There is scientific evidence for treating metatarsalgia with different types of orthotics that not only help improve the pain but also reduce the number of swollen joints. The combination with therapeutic shoe with or without external changes produces better results. Conclusion: There is little scientific evidence on the use of orthosis treatment for rheumatoid foot but found some articles that support its effectiveness, so it is essential to carry out studies in this field (AU)

MRI assessment of regional differences in phosphorus-31 metabolism and morphological abnormalities of the foot muscles in diabetes.

PURPOSE: To assess differences in the phosphorus-31 (31 P) metabolism and morphology in multiple muscle regions in the forefoot of diabetic patients and normal subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen diabetic patients and 15 normal subjects were assessed for muscle atrophy by 1 H magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T to grade the flexor hallucis, adductor hallucis, interosseous regions, and entire foot cross-section. Each region and the entire foot were also quantitatively evaluated for metabolic function using 31 P imaging for spatial mapping of the inorganic phosphate (Pi) to phosphocreatine (PCr) ratio (Pi/PCr). The ratio of viable muscle area to the predefined region areas (31 P/1 H) was calculated. The variability of each method was assessed by its coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Muscle atrophy was significantly more severe in diabetic compared to normal subjects in all regions (P < 0.01). The 31 P/1 H area ratio was significantly larger in the adductor hallucis than in the other two regions (P < 0.05). The Pi/PCr ratio was significantly different between the two groups in the flexor hallucis and interosseous regions (P < 0.05) but not adductor hallucis region. The CV for Pi/PCr ranged from 10.13 to 55.84, while it ranged from 73.40 to 263.90 for qualitative grading. CONCLUSION: Changes in atrophy and metabolism appear to occur unequally between different regions of the forefoot in diabetes. The adductor hallucis region appears more capable of maintaining structural and metabolic integrity than the flexor hallucis or interosseous regions. The CV analysis suggests that the quantitative 31 P methods have less variability than the qualitative grading. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1132-1142.