Procedimiento de malone videoasistido en pediatria: primeros dos casos en Uruguay / Laparoscopic malone procedure in pediatrics: first cases in Uruguay / Procedimento de malone videoassistido em pediatria: dois primeiros casos no Uruguai

El procedimiento de apendicostomía continente para la realización de enemas anterógrados ha sido publicado ya hace varios años para el tratamiento de la incontinencia fecal y del estreñimiento de muy difícil manejo. Otra indicación del mismo incluye el estreñimiento severo, en el cual se agotaron las medidas farmacológicas y el único tratamiento efectivo es la realización de enemas. El objetivo principal del procedimiento es ofrecer a los niños y sus familias una alternativa a la hora de realizar los enemas, logrando una mayor adherencia al tratamiento y buscando alcanzar una mejor calidad de vida que permita adecuarse a las actividades con sus pares. Por otra parte permite al niño ir logrando cierta independencia gradual a medida que crezca, preparándolos para el futuro y haciéndolos participes activos de su cuidado. Se describen los primeros casos en donde utilizamos en nuestro medio el abordaje laparoscópico, sus indicaciones, la técnica quirúrgica y los resultados iniciales. Hemos constatado como ventaja principal los beneficios del abordaje mínimamente invasivo, como la exploración completa de la cavidad abdominal, el menor dolor postoperatorio, cicatrices más pequeñas, menor creación de adherencias.

The appendicostomy procedure for performing antegrade enemas has been published several years ago for the treatment of fecal incontinence and constipation that are very difficult to manage. The Malone procedure is performed in our setting, especially in patients with fecal incontinence secondary to neurological disorders such as myelomeningocele using a conventional approach. Other indications of it is severe constipation, in which pharmacological measures have been exhausted and the only effective treatment is enemas. The main objective of the procedure is to offer children and their families an alternative when performing enemas, achieving greater adherence to treatment and seeking to achieve a better quality of life that allows them to adapt to the activities of their peers. On the other hand, it allows the child to achieve a certain gradual independence as they grow, preparing them for the future and making them active participants in their care. The first cases in which we use the laparoscopic approach, its indications, the surgical technique and the initial results are described. We think that its main advantage is the benefits of the minimally invasive approach, such as complete exploration of the abdominal cavity, less postoperative pain, smaller scars, and less creation of adhesions.

O procedimento de apendicostomia continente para a realização de enemas anterógrados foi publicado há vários anos para o tratamento de incontinência fecal e constipação de difícil manejo. Outra indicação inclui constipação grave, na qual as medidas farmacológicas foram esgotadas e o único tratamento eficaz são os enemas. O principal objetivo do procedimento é oferecer às crianças e seus familiares uma alternativa na realização dos enemas, alcançando maior adesão ao tratamento e buscando alcançar uma melhor qualidade de vida que lhes permita adaptar-se às atividades com seus pares. Por outro lado, permite que a criança alcance uma certa independência gradual à medida que cresce, preparando-a para o futuro e tornando-a participante ativa em seus cuidados. São descritos os primeiros casos em que utilizamos a via laparoscópica, suas indicações, a técnica cirúrgica e os resultados iniciais. Confirmamos os benefícios da abordagem minimamente invasiva como principal vantagem, como exploração completa da cavidade abdominal, menos dor pós-operatória, cicatrizes menores e menor formação de aderências.

Same day discharge after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy in community hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Same-day discharge (SDD) protocols after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy have not been well studied in a community hospital setting, especially when hospitals with low inpatient pediatric censuses are increasingly closing their pediatric units. This study evaluates the outcomes of a SDD protocol after pediatric appendectomy that was implemented across an integrated healthcare system in which hospitals experienced closure of pediatric units. METHODS: Patients between ages 6 to 13 years-old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from January 1st 2015 to December 31st 2020 were reviewed. During the study period, an inter-hospital SDD protocol was introduced at nine hospitals, four of which closed their pediatric units. RESULTS: There were 1293 patients in the pre-protocol cohort and 953 patients in the post-protocol cohort. There were 588 (45.5%) patients who underwent SDD in the pre-protocol cohort, compared with 804 (84.4%) patients in the post-protocol cohort (p<0.00001). Postoperative narcotics were prescribed to 358 (27.7%) patients in the pre-protocol cohort, compared to 482 (50.6%) patients in the post-protocol cohort (P<0.00001). There was no difference in the 30-day emergency department visit rate or 30-day readmission rate between the two cohorts. A subgroup analysis comparing the surgical outcomes at community hospitals with and without pediatric units after implementation of the SDD protocol showed no difference. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in community hospitals, even after pediatric unit closure, is safe and feasible. The decrease in postoperative LOS and the increase in SDD are not associated with higher complication rates.

Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare expenditure is on the rise placing greater emphasis on operational excellence, cost containment, and high quality of care. Significant variation is seen in operating room (OR) costs with common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgeons can influence cost through the selection of instrumentation for common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to quantify the cost of laparoscopic appendectomy in our healthcare system and compare cost variations to operative times and outcomes. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We performed a retrospective review of laparoscopic appendectomies in a large regional healthcare system during one-year period (2018). Operating room supply costs and procedure durations were obtained for each hospital. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) outcomes and demographics were compared to the costs for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 4757 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed at 20 hospitals (27 to 522 per hospital) by 233 surgeons. The average supply cost per case ranged from $650 to $1067. Individual surgeon cost ranged from $197 to $1181. The average operative time was 41 min (range 33 to 60 min). There was no association between lower cost and longer operative time. The patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between sites. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between high- and low-cost centers. The items with the greatest increase in cost were single-use energy devices (SUD) and endoscopic stapler. We estimate that a saving of over $417 per case is possible by avoiding the use of energy devices and may be as high as $ 984 by adding selective use of staplers. These modifications would result in an annual savings of $1 million for our health system and more than $ 125 million nationwide. CONCLUSION: Performing laparoscopic appendectomy with reusable instruments and finding alternatives to expensive energy devices and staplers can significantly decrease costs and does not increase operative time or postoperative complications.

Needlescopic Appendectomy in Children and Adolescents Using 14-Gauge Needles: A New Era.

Purpose: We are presenting a very minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic appendectomy (needlescopic appendectomy [NAP]) in children and adolescents using suture grasper device, epidural needle, and homemade isolated long diathermy probe without any conventional laparoscopic instruments. Patients and Methods: NAP was attempted in 48 patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis at Al-Azhar, Tanta University Hospitals and other allied hospitals during the period from May 2017 to November 2018. The study included patients with acute appendicitis and patients scheduled for interval appendectomy. Exclusion criteria were patients with concealed appendix, patients with appendicular abscess or appendicular mass, patients with acute appendicitis complicated with generalized peritonitis, and patients unfit for laparoscopy. The appendix was brought outside through the umbilical port and the operation was completed extracorporeally. In cases of appendicitis with tethered cecum, the whole procedure was completed intracorporeally. Results: Forty-eight patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis were treated by NAP. They were 36 males and 12 females with a mean age of 9 ± 3.7 years (range = 4-15 years). Two cases with concealed appendix and one case with appendicular mass were diagnosed during initial laparoscopy and excluded from the study. Thirty-two cases (71.11%) were completed intracorporeally and 13 cases (28.89%) were completed by extracorporeal NAP. The mean operative time was 33.29 ± 3.95 minutes (range = 27-40 minutes) for intracorporeal NAP and 20.9 ± 7.01 minutes (range = 14-40 minutes) for extracorporeal NAP. Degrees of cosmetic satisfaction of the patients and parents were excellent in 93.33% (N = 42/45 patients), and very good in 6.67% (N = 3/45 patients) of patients. Conclusion: NAP using needles only is a new technique that is very minimally invasive, very cheap, safe, reproducible, and easy to be done with outstanding cosmetic results.

Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in surgery: Results of a targeted audit in a large-scale region-based French hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: While regional monitoring of antibiotic use has decreased since 2011 by 3.2%, in some healthcare facilities a significant increase (+43%) has occurred. The purpose of this study was to assess regional antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) compliance with national guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2015, 26 healthcare facilities, both public and private, were requested to audit five items: utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis, the antimicrobial agent (the molecule) administered, time between injection and incision, initial dose, number of intraoperative and postoperative additional doses. Seven surgical procedures were selected for assessment: appendicectomy (APP), cataract (CAT), cesarean section (CES), colorectal cancer surgery (CCR), hysterectomy (HYS), total hip arthroplasty (THA) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A statistical analysis of the 2303 records included was carried out. RESULTS: The general rate of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was 64%. The antimicrobial agent used and initial dose were in compliance with the guidelines for 93% and 97.4% of cases respectively, and administration of antibiotic prophylaxis was achieved 60minutes before incision in 77.6% of the records included. Regarding gastrointestinal surgery, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was used in 32% of patients. In 26% of appendectomy files, administration occurred after incision, and one out of two files showed non-complaint perioperative and postoperative consumption. CONCLUSION: Compliance with nationwide ABP guidelines is in need of pronounced improvement, especially with regard to time interval between injection and incision and the molecule prescribed. An action plan based on specific recommendations addressed to each establishment and an updated regionwide ABP protocol are aimed at achieving better and reduced consumption of antimicrobial agents.

Practice Patterns and Guideline Non-Adherence in Surgical Management of Appendiceal Carcinoid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of appendiceal carcinoid tumors is heavily debated, despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommending aggressive resection of tumors >2 cm. We investigated national practice patterns and the predictors and impact of guideline non-adherence. STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of appendiceal carcinoids diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 treated with either appendectomy or hemicolectomy. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, identified associations with the procedure type among patients stratified by tumor size ≤2 cm and >2 cm. Cox Proportional Hazards then identified associations with overall survival among stratified patient groups. RESULTS: Of 3,198 cases of appendiceal carcinoids, 1,893 appendectomies and 1,305 hemicolectomies were identified. Contrary to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, 32.4% of tumors ≤2 cm were treated with hemicolectomy and 31.3% of tumors >2 cm were treated with definitive appendectomy. Hemicolectomy for small tumors was associated with age 65 years and older (odds ratio [OR] 2.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 3.3; reference group age 18 to 39 years), history of malignancy (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.6 to 2.6), tumor size 1.1 to 2 cm (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3 to 3.4; reference group size ≤1 cm), and lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2); appendectomy for large tumors was associated with age 65 years and older only (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.2). Procedure type was not associated with survival for small or large tumors (hazard ratio 1.0; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.4 and hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI 0.6 to 2.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite well-known size-based treatment guidelines for appendiceal carcinoids, one-third of patients in the US undergo hemicolectomy for small tumors and appendectomy for large tumors. Guideline non-adherence, however, is not associated with overall survival. Reasons for these practice patterns should be explored, and guidelines revisited.

Effect of Local Anesthesia on the Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery causes less pain than traditional surgery; however, to relieve postoperative pain, surgeons frequently apply local anesthetic preemptively. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different local anesthetics on pain intensity in patients who had undergone a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), who received the anesthetic preemptively at incision sites and postemptively, intraperitoneally and trocar sites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 LA patients (men and women) were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 groups (N = 30/group): Group 1: no peritoneal or local administration of local anesthetics during LA; Group 2: 5 mL of 1% lidocaine was applied at incision sites and 10 mL 1% lidocaine was injected under direct vision in the right iliac fossa area and around the stump of the appendix and trocar sites at the end of the procedure; Group 3: 5 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine applied at incision sites +10 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine injected in the same place intraperitoneally and trocar sites at the end of the procedure; Group 4: 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine at incision sites +10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine injected in the same place intraperitoneally and trocar sites at the end of the procedure. Postoperative pain was assessed after 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours using a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: By comparing the average values of pain intensity using VAS, we observed significantly different average values of pain intensity in the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine (3 and 4) groups in comparison with the control Group 1 (P < .05) throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: We observed a reduction in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting in patients with LA who received intraoperative local anesthetic preemptively at the incision sites and postemptively, intraperitoneally. After the application of levobupivacaine the intensity of pain was significantly lower than in any other tested group.

Consideraciones vigentes en torno al diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda / Current considerations on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

La apendicitis aguda es la causa más común de abdomen agudo y de intervención quirúrgica efectuada en los servicios de urgencias y a pesar de ser conocida desde tiempos remotos, su diagnóstico todavía adolece de imprecisiones que preocupan a la comunidad científica. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sobre los criterios vigentes en torno al diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda a fin de profundizar en sus aspectos cognoscitivos. Métodos: Búsqueda digital en bases de datos Web of Science, Lilacs, Scielo, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline y Google de publicaciones actualizadas en inglés y español. Resultados: En los últimos años ha descendido la mortalidad asociada a la apendicitis aguda, lo cual se atribuye a los avances tecnológicos de la cirugía y de la anestesiología y reanimación, la existencia de salas de cuidados intensivos para la atención de pacientes graves y de la utilización de antibióticos cada vez más potentes. No obstante, la morbilidad todavía refleja alta incidencia de perforaciones a pesar de la utilización de marcadores inflamatorios, los diagnósticos realizados mediante imágenes, y del desarrollo de técnicas videolaparoscópicas. Aun así, continúan realizándose apendicectomías en apéndices normales. Conclusiones: La clínica sigue siendo el método de elección para efectuar el diagnóstico, dado que los exámenes de laboratorio e imágenes no han logrado superarlo. Si bien constituyen una importante ayuda, toda vez que las escalas diagnósticas contribuyen a su precocidad en aras de disminuir la morbilidad y mortalidad, así como las apendicectomías innecesarias o en estadios avanzados de la enfermedad(AU)

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen and surgical treatment in the emergency services, and although this disease has been known since ancient times, its diagnosis still has inaccuracies that concern the scientific community. Objective: To make a review of the current criteria about the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in order to delve into its cognitive aspects. Methods: Search of updated publications in Spanish and English in Science, Lilacs, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline and Google databases. Results: In the last few years, the acute appendicitis-associated mortality has decreased due to the technological advances in surgery, anesthesiology and resuscitation, the existence of intensive care units for critically-ill patients and the use of increasingly powerful antibiotics. However, morbidity rates still show high incidence of perforations despite the use of inflammatory markers, imaging-based diagnoses and the development of videolaparoscopic techniques. Despite all this, appendicectomies continue to be performed to treat normal appendices. Conclusions: The clinical method remains the method of choice to make a diagnosis, since the lab and imaging tests have not been better so far. Nevertheless, they are important support because the diagnostic scales contribute to their earliness with a view to reducing morbidity and mortality as well as unnecessary appendicectomies or appendicectomy in advanced disease stagings(AU)

Consideraciones vigentes en torno al diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda / Current considerations on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Introducción: La apendicitis aguda es la causa más común de abdomen agudo y de intervención quirúrgica efectuada en los servicios de urgencias y a pesar de ser conocida desde tiempos remotos, su diagnóstico todavía adolece de imprecisiones que preocupan a la comunidad científica. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sobre los criterios vigentes en torno al diagnóstico de la apendicitis aguda a fin de profundizar en sus aspectos cognoscitivos. Métodos: Búsqueda digital en bases de datos Web of Science, Lilacs, Scielo, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline y Google de publicaciones actualizadas en inglés y español. Resultados: En los últimos años ha descendido la mortalidad asociada a la apendicitis aguda, lo cual se atribuye a los avances tecnológicos de la cirugía y de la anestesiología y reanimación, la existencia de salas de cuidados intensivos para la atención de pacientes graves y de la utilización de antibióticos cada vez más potentes. No obstante, la morbilidad todavía refleja alta incidencia de perforaciones a pesar de la utilización de marcadores inflamatorios, los diagnósticos realizados mediante imágenes, y del desarrollo de técnicas videolaparoscópicas. Aun así, continúan realizándose apendicectomías en apéndices normales. Conclusiones: La clínica sigue siendo el método de elección para efectuar el diagnóstico, dado que los exámenes de laboratorio e imágenes no han logrado superarlo. Si bien constituyen una importante ayuda, toda vez que las escalas diagnósticas contribuyen a su precocidad en aras de disminuir la morbilidad y mortalidad, así como las apendicectomías innecesarias o en estadios avanzados de la enfermedad(AU)

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen and surgical treatment in the emergency services, and although this disease has been known since ancient times, its diagnosis still has inaccuracies that concern the scientific community. Objective: To make a review of the current criteria about the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in order to delve into its cognitive aspects. Methods: Search of updated publications in Spanish and English in Science, Lilacs, Latindex, Elsevier, PubMed, Medline and Google databases. Results: In the last few years, the acute appendicitis-associated mortality has decreased due to the technological advances in surgery, anesthesiology and resuscitation, the existence of intensive care units for critically-ill patients and the use of increasingly powerful antibiotics. However, morbidity rates still show high incidence of perforations despite the use of inflammatory markers, imaging-based diagnoses and the development of videolaparoscopic techniques. Despite all this, appendicectomies continue to be performed to treat normal appendices. Conclusions: The clinical method remains the method of choice to make a diagnosis, since the lab and imaging tests have not been better so far. Nevertheless, they are important support because the diagnostic scales contribute to their earliness with a view to reducing morbidity and mortality as well as unnecessary appendicectomies or appendicectomy in advanced disease stagings(AU)

Ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block vs. conventional local analgesia in single port laparoscopic appendectomy for children with nonperforated appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic surgery can cause considerable pain. Regional analgesic techniques such as the rectus sheath block (RSB) offer improved pain management following elective umbilical hernia repair in the pediatric population. This effect has not been examined in laparoscopic single-incision surgery in children. We sought to compare the efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB versus local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) in providing postoperative pain relief in pediatric single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy (TULA) with same-day discharge. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 275 children, ages 4 to 17 years old, who underwent TULA for uncomplicated appendicitis in a single institution from August 2014 to July 2015. We compared those that received preincision bilateral RSB (n=136) with those who received LAI (n=139). The primary outcome was narcotic administration. Secondary outcomes included initial and mean scores, time from anesthesia induction to release, operative time, time to rescue dose of analgesic in the PACU and time to PACU discharge. RESULTS: Total narcotic administration was significantly reduced in patients that underwent preincision RSB compared to those that received conventional LAI, with a mean of 0.112 mg/kg of morphine versus 0.290 mg/kg morphine (p<0.0001). Patients undergoing RSB reported lower initial (0.38 vs. 2.38; p<0.0001) and mean pain scores (1.26 vs. 1.77; p<0.015). Time to rescue analgesia was prolonged in patients undergoing RSB compared to LAI (58.93min vs. 41.56min; p=0.047). CONCLUSION: Preincision RSB for TULA in uncomplicated appendicitis in children is associated with decreased opioid consumption and lower pain scores compared with LAI. As the addition of this procedure only added 6.67min to time under anesthesia, we feel that it is a viable option for postoperative pain control in pediatric single-incision laparoscopic surgery. RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY: LEVEL III EVIDENCE.

Adenocarcinoma mimicking appendicular lump: a diagnostic dilemma-a case report.

BACKGROUND: Primary appendiceal adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor, mucinous variety being common. This case is reported to highlight the unusual presentation and diagnostic difficulty of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient presented with acute appendicitis with ill-defined tender lump which responded to conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: High index of suspicion should be kept in mind for elderly patients presenting with appendicular lump. Every effort should be made during elective appendectomy to remove stump in case of sloughed out appendix.

Predicting Postoperative Complications After Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Assessment of risk factors for postoperative complications following surgical treatment of pediatric perforated appendicitis (PA) is necessary to identify those patients in need of closer monitoring. In this study, we have investigated the impact of different risk factors on the occurrence of complications after an appendectomy in children with PA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective, single-centre analysis of all pediatric PA conducted over a 10-year period. Preoperative clinical and laboratory results, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Risk factors were defined and a risk score was determined for postoperative complications and reinterventions. RESULTS: Surgical treatment for appendicitis was performed in 840 pediatric patients during the observation period. 163 of the included patients were diagnosed with PA (mean age 8.9 ± 3.6 years). 19 (11.7%) patients developed postoperative complications, 17 (10.4%) of which required complication-related intervention. We identified five predictors of postoperative complications: the C-related protein value at admission, purulent peritonitis, open appendectomy (primary, secondary, or converted), placement of an abdominal drain, and administration of antibiotics not compliant to results from the subsequent antibiogram. The determined risk score was significantly higher in the complication group (p < .0001) and reintervention group (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications following pediatric PA can be predicted using specific preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors. In the high-risk group, an active prevention, detection, and intervention of any occurring complication is necessary and we present a new specific pediatric risk score to define patients at risk for complications.

Electroacupuncture for postoperative pain and gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic appendectomy (AcuLap): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is a widely serviced complementary medicine. Although acupuncture is suggested for managing postoperative ileus and pain, supporting evidence is weak. The AcuLap trial is designed to provide high-level evidence regarding whether or not electroacupuncture is effective in promoting gastrointestinal motility and controlling pain after laparoscopic surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial with a three-arm, parallel-group structure evaluating the efficacy of electroacupuncture for gastrointestinal motility and postoperative pain after laparoscopic appendectomy. Patients with appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic surgery are included and randomized into three groups: 1) electroacupuncture group, 2) sham acupuncture group, and 3) control group. Patients receive 1) acupuncture with electrostimulation or 2) fake electroacupuncture with sham device twice a day or 3) no acupuncture after laparoscopic appendectomy. The primary outcome is time to first passing flatus after operation. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, analgesics, nausea/vomiting, bowel motility, time to tolerable diet, complications, hospital stay, readmission rates, time to recovery, quality of life, medical costs, and protocol failure rate. Patients and hospital staff (physicians and nurses) are blinded to which group the patient is assigned, electroacupuncture or sham acupuncture. Data analysis personnel are blinded to group assignment among all three groups. Estimated sample size to detect a minimum difference of time to first flatus with 80 % power, 5 % significance, and 10 % drop rate is 29 × 3 groups = 87 patients. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: The AcuLap trial will provide evidence on the merits and/or demerits of electroacupuncture for bowel motility recovery and pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea ( KCT0001486 ) on 14 May 2015.

Randomized clinical trial comparing two different techniques of local anesthesia (subcutaneous versus subcutaneous & deep infiltration) for postoperative pain in patients undergoing open appendecectomy.

This study compared the postoperative analgesic effect of local anesthetic (LA) injected subcutaneous (SC) alone versus local anesthetic injected both SC and deep in patients undergoing open appendecectomy operations. Sixty patients ASA class I-II undergoing open appendecectomy for presumed acute appendicitis will be randomly assigned into three groups. After routine monitoring, anesthesia induction was performed with propofol, fentanyl and, cis-atracurium; later, maintenance was continued with isoflurane. GA received local infiltration of the skin prior to incision with bupivacaine 0.25% (10 ml), GB received received half the bupivacaine infiltrated into the skin and other half deep-to external oblique prior to incision to create a local nerve field blockade & GC received half dose of saline subcutaneous & half deep to external oblique muscle prior to incision. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue score (VAS) at 1, 4, 8, & 24 hours post extubation. Pethidine 1 mg/kg was given if VAS is ≥ 4. All patients in GA (SC) and Control required postoperative analgesics, compared to only 60% of the patients in GB (SC+deep). Time for the first analgesic requirement was prolonged in GB compared to other groups (P < 0.01). VAS scores were significantly lower in patients of GB in the first 8 hr. postoperative compared to GA &GC (P < 0.01).

Treatment of suspected acute perforated appendicitis with antibiotics and interval appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Initial antibiotics with planned interval appendectomy (interval AP) have been used to treat patients with complicated perforated appendicitis; however, little experience exists with this approach in children with suspected acute perforated appendicitis (SAPA). We sought to determine the outcome of initial antibiotics and interval AP in children with SAPA. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, 751 consecutive patients underwent appendectomy including 105 patients with SAPA who were treated with initial intravenous antibiotics and planned interval AP ≥ 8 weeks after presentation. All SAPA patients had symptoms for ≤ 96 hours. Primary outcome variables were rates of readmission, abscess formation, and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks. RESULTS: Intraabdominal abscess rate was 27%. Appendectomy prior to planned interval AP was 11% and readmission occurred in 34%. All patients underwent eventual appendectomy with pathologic confirmation confirming the previous appendiceal inflammation. White blood cell (WBC) count >15,000, WBC >15,000 plus fecalith on imaging, and WBC >15,000 plus duration of symptoms >48 hours were all significantly associated with higher rates of readmission (p=0.01, p=0.04, p=0.02) and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks (p=0.003, p=0.05, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SAPA with antibiotics and planned interval AP is successful in the majority of patients; however, complications such as abscess formation and/or readmission prior to planned interval AP occur in up to one-third of patients. Certain clinical variables are associated with increased treatment complications.

Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgeries are associated with reduced surgical stress response and shortened post-operative recovery, intense pain and high analgesia requirements in the immediate post-operative period are often the chief complaints. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthetic drugs on post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy. METHOD: The method used was a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study. Patients with clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis who fulfil the criteria, were taken into this study. Primary outcomes investigated were consumption of patient-controlled analgesia during the immediate post-operative period (first 6 h) and subsequent 18 h as well as serum cortisol sampling. RESULTS: Total of 120 patients were recruited into three different treatment groups (placebo, ropivacaine, levobupivacaine). In order to maintain visual analogue score of 0-1 during the immediate post-operative period, patients in the placebo group required significantly (P < 0.001) higher dose of analgesia (morphine/mg) - 11 mg (8.3-15.5) as compared with ropivacaine - 4 mg (3.0-6.0) and levobupivacaine - 3.5 mg (2.0-5.0). The immediate post-operative serum cortisol showed a significant increase in serum cortisol in the placebo group (P = 0.001) as compared with ropivacaine and levobupivacaine groups. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia in laparoscopy surgery is a safe, non-invasive procedure that can benefit patients by reducing the immediate post-operative pain intensity and metabolic stress response of the body.

Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy: an alternative minimally invasive technique in pediatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (TULAA) has been reported in the literature as an alternative to traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Our study compares outcomes between LA and the one-trocar transumbilical technique in a single institution over a concurrent time frame for all cases of pediatric appendicitis. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review of all appendectomies from July 2007 through June 2009 was performed. All appendectomies were performed either laparoscopically or transumbilically. One surgeon predominantly used the TULAA method, whereas the other 2 surgeons used strictly the LA method. No cases were converted to open. Categorization of specimens as normal, acute, or ruptured was based on pathology reports. Outcomes analyzed for each group included surgical duration, cost, length of stay, fever (>101.5F), wound infection, ileus, and postoperative abdominal-pelvic abscess. RESULTS: A total of 131 appendectomies were performed by 3 surgeons, 83 were LA and 48 were TULAA. For all stages of appendicitis, outcomes differed significantly only for operating room cost, with the TULAA being significantly less expensive. All other outcomes were similar between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that TULAA is a reasonable alternative to the standard minimally invasive technique for appendicitis in both acute and ruptured situations. All analyzed complications were similar between the groups, suggesting that TULAA is an acceptable surgical method in pediatric patients for all stages of appendicitis.

A case of appendiceal Crohn's disease in which a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed.

A 74-year-old female had occasionally experienced right lower abdominal pain in the past. She underwent a barium enema examination during a medical checkup, which revealed a wall irregularity around the appendix, but the appendix itself was not visualized. The patient was referred to our hospital for possible appendiceal neoplasm. Colonoscopy revealed a tumor-like protrusion with marked redness at the entrance to the appendix. Pathologic analysis of biopsy specimens revealed only inflammatory cells. Differential diagnosis of appendiceal Crohn's disease or appendiceal neoplasm was made, and laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Pathologic examination revealed inflammation in all layers of the appendiceal wall and noncaseating epithelioid cell granuloma, and a diagnosis of appendiceal Crohn's disease was made. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged from the hospital 3 days after surgery. No sign of recurrence has been observed up to now, 6 months after surgical treatment.

Intraperitoneal treatment for peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin after operative management: long-term follow-up of the Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors and the impact of intraperitoneal (IP) treatment after surgical resection of peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMC) of appendiceal origin. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PMC is a rare, malignant, intra-abdominal neoplasm that produces large amounts of mucin. Patients typically present with diffuse peritoneal disease. After surgical treatment, multiple locoregional recurrences are common; recurrences outside the abdomen are infrequent. Treatment regimens include debulking, radiotherapy with IP radioisotopes, and chemotherapies (IP, systemic, or both). Because reported data are variable and heterogeneous, treatment evaluations are challenging. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 115 consecutive patients with PMC who underwent maximal surgical resection with or without postoperative therapy between 1985 and 2000 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. After maximal resection, 37 patients received IP 5-fluorouracil, 35 of whom also received IP chromic phosphate P 32. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. RESULTS: All gross disease was removed in 61% of patients. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the median OS was 8.1 years. Median OS for patients receiving versus not receiving IP therapy was 23.5 years versus 7.5 years, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS for those receiving and not receiving IP therapy was 82%, 65%, and 52% versus 60%, 27%, and 15%, respectively. Adverse prognostic factors for OS identified by univariate analysis included partial mucin debulking, adenocarcinoma histology, systemic chemotherapy, diffuse IP disease at presentation, and no IP therapy. On multivariate analysis, diffuse IP disease at presentation and no IP therapy remained significant. A separate analysis was performed for the 70 patients who underwent gross total resection, 51% of whom received IP therapy. Adverse prognostic factors for OS included adenocarcinoma histology, systemic chemotherapy, and no IP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This large, single-institution, retrospective series with long-term follow-up suggests that IP chromic phosphate P 32 and 5-fluorouracil after maximal surgical resection of PMC of appendiceal origin is associated with improved OS and disease-free survival.