Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Revised 2021 Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Nutrition Support.

Nutrition support is a therapy that crosses all ages, diseases, and conditions as health care practitioners strive to meet the nutritional requirements of individuals who are unable to meet nutritional and/or hydration needs with oral intake alone. Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), as integral members of the nutrition support team provide needed information, such as identification of malnutrition risk, macro- and micronutrient requirements, and type of nutrition support therapy (eg, enteral or parenteral), including the route (eg, nasogastric vs nasojejunal or tunneled catheter vs port). The Dietitians in Nutrition Support Dietetic Practice Group, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, along with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Management Committee, have updated the Standards of Practice (SOP) and Standards of Professional Performance (SOPP) for RDNs working in nutrition support. The SOP and SOPP for RDNs in Nutrition Support provide indicators that describe the following 3 levels of practice: competent, proficient, and expert. The SOP uses the Nutrition Care Process and clinical workflow elements for delivering patient/client care. The SOPP describes the 6 domains that focus on professional performance. Specific indicators outlined in the SOP and SOPP depict how these standards apply to practice. The SOP and SOPP are complementary resources for RDNs and are intended to be used as a self-evaluation tool for assuring competent practice in nutrition support and for determining potential education and training needs for advancement to a higher practice level in a variety of settings.

[ASPEN-FELANPE Clinical Guidelines: Nutrition Support of Adult Patients with Enterocutaneous Fistula]. / Guías Clínicas ASPEN-FELANPE: Terapia Nutricional en Pacientes Adultos con Fístulas Enterocutáneas.

INTRODUCTION: Background: the management of patients with enterocutaneous fistula (ECF) requires an interdisciplinary approach and poses a significant challenge to surgeons, gastroenterologists, intensivists, wound/stoma care specialists, and nutrition support clinicians. Available guidelines for optimizing nutritional status in these patients are often vague, based on limited and dated clinical studies, and typically rely on individual or institutional experience. Specific nutrient requirements, appropriate route of feeding, role of immune-enhancing nutrients, and use of somatostatin analogs in the management of patients with ECF remain a challenge for the clinician. The purpose of this clinical guideline is to develop recommendations for the nutritional care of adult patients with ECF. Methods: a systematic review of the best available evidence to answer a series of questions regarding clinical management of adults with ECF was undertaken and evaluated using concepts adopted from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. An anonymous consensus process was used to develop the clinical guideline recommendations prior to peer review and approval by the A.S.P.E.N. and FELANPE Board of Directors. Questions: in adult patients with enterocutaneous fistula: 1) What factors best describe nutritional status? 2) What is the preferred route of nutritional therapy (oral diet, EN or PN)? 3) What protein and energy intake provide best clinical outcomes? 4) Is fistuloclysis associated with better outcomes than standard care? 5) Are immune-enhancing nutrients associated with better outcomes? 6) Does the use of somatostatin provide better outcomes than standard medical therapy? 7) When is home parenteral nutrition support indicated?

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: el manejo de las fístulas enterocutáneas (FEC) es un reto que requiere enfoque interdisciplinario y plantea un desafío importante. Las guías para optimizar el estado nutricional en estos pacientes están basadas en estudios que dependen de la experiencia individual y, ocasionalmente, institucional; que se focalizan en el tratamiento integral de las FEC, centrándose en el manejo médico y quirúrgico, mientras que la terapia nutricional se revisa solo superficialmente. Los requerimientos nutricionales, vía de administración, uso de inmunonutrición y de análogos de la somatostatina en el tratamiento de estos pacientes no están bien definidos. El objetivo de esta guía es desarrollar recomendaciones específicas para la terapia nutricional de los pacientes adultos con FEC. Método: revisión sistemática de la mejor evidencia disponible para responder a una serie de preguntas sobre la terapia nutricional de los adultos con FEC, evaluada utilizando la metodología GRADE. Se utilizó un proceso de consenso anónimo para desarrollar las recomendaciones de la guía clínica antes de la revisión por pares y la aprobación por las Juntas Directivas de ASPEN y FELANPE. Preguntas: 1) ¿Qué factores describen mejor el estado nutricional de los adultos con FEC? 2) ¿Cuál es la mejor vía para administrar la terapia nutricional (oral, nutrición enteral o parenteral)? 3) ¿Qué aporte energético y proteico proporciona mejores resultados clínicos? 4) ¿El uso de la fistuloclisis se asocia a mejores resultados? 5) ¿Las fórmulas inmunomoduladoras se asocian a mejores resultados? 6) ¿El uso de la somatostatina proporciona mejores resultados? 7) ¿Cuándo está indicada la terapia nutricional parenteral domiciliaria?

Effect of early enteral nutrition support for the management of acute severe pancreatitis: A protocol of systematic review.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the effect of early enteral nutrition support (EENS) for the management of acute severe pancreatitis (ASP). METHODS: This study will search Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CNKI, and WANGFANG from their inception to the present without language limitations. In addition, this study will also search clinical trial registry and reference lists of included trials. Eligible comparators will be standard care, medications, and any other interventions. Two authors will independently scan all citations, titles/abstracts, and full-text studies. The study methodological quality will be appraised using Cochrane risk of bias tool. If it is possible, we will pool out data and perform meta-analysis. Strength of evidence for each main outcome will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: This study will summarize the most recent evidence to assess the effect of EENS for the management of ASP. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study will help to determine whether EENS is effective for patients with ASP. STUDY REGISTRATION: INPLASY202070009.

Relevant Nutrition Therapy in COVID-19 and the Constraints on Its Delivery by a Unique Disease Process.

Worldwide, as of July 2020, >13.2 million people have been infected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. The spectrum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from mild illness to critical illness in 5% of cases. The population infected with SARS-CoV-2 requiring an intensive care unit admission often requires nutrition therapy as part of supportive care. Although the various societal guidelines for critical care nutrition meet most needs for the patient with COVID-19, numerous factors, which impact the application of those guideline recommendations, need to be considered. Since the SARS-CoV-2 virus is highly contagious, several key principles should be considered when caring for all patients with COVID-19 to ensure the safety of all healthcare personnel involved. Management strategies should cluster care, making all attempts to bundle patient care to limit exposure. Healthcare providers should be protected, and the spread of SARS-CoV-2 should be limited by minimizing procedures and other interventions that lead to aerosolization, avoiding droplet exposure through hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE should be preserved by decreasing the number of individuals providing direct patient care and by limiting the number of patient interactions. Enteral nutrition (EN) is tolerated by the majority of patients with COVID-19, but a relatively low threshold for conversion to parenteral nutrition should be maintained if increased exposure to the virus is required to continue EN. This article offers relevant and practical recommendations on how to optimize nutrition therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Biomarkers in critical care nutrition.

The goal of nutrition support is to provide the substrates required to match the bioenergetic needs of the patient and promote the net synthesis of macromolecules required for the preservation of lean mass, organ function, and immunity. Contemporary observational studies have exposed the pervasive undernutrition of critically ill patients and its association with adverse clinical outcomes. The intuitive hypothesis is that optimization of nutrition delivery should improve ICU clinical outcomes. It is therefore surprising that multiple large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate the clinical benefit of restoring or maximizing nutrient intake. This may be in part due to the absence of biological markers that identify patients who are most likely to benefit from nutrition interventions and that monitor the effects of nutrition support. Here, we discuss the need for practical risk stratification tools in critical care nutrition, a proposed rationale for targeted biomarker development, and potential approaches that can be adopted for biomarker identification and validation in the field.

Nutrition services offered to pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the qualifications of nurses working in antenatal clinics, and to identify current nutrition services and information provided to pregnant women. To explore barriers and enablers to the provision of nutrition services by nurses to pregnant women attending antenatal clinics mapped against the Theoretical Domains Framework. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional qualitative study, conducted in three municipal hospitals (Temeke, Mwananyamala and Ilala) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen nurses currently providing health services to pregnant women, with at least two months' work experience within in the selected facility were purposively selected. METHOD: In-depth interviews were carried out with the participants by three trained research assistants using guides prepared in Swahili. Transcripts were translated into English and imported to NVivo 12 software. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis principles. RESULTS: Five nutrition services commonly provided to pregnant women at antenatal clinics were nutrition education, iron and folic acid supplementation, weight measurements, dietary assessment and haemoglobin level monitoring. Domains included knowledge, skills, beliefs about capabilities, in addition to memory, attention and decision processes, and the environmental context and resources domains had both barriers and enablers identified by participants. The three remaining domains of the social/professional role and identity, optimism, and beliefs about consequences had only enablers reported. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Nurses deliver nutrition care to pregnant women during routine antenatal clinic visits. However, the information delivered to pregnant women varied among nurses, and a number of barriers and enablers to provision of nutrition care to pregnant women were identified. This data can inform future improvement to strategies for implementing nutrition services to pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. In-service training to nurses working with pregnant women and availability of tailored nutrition education materials, such as a food guide in these health facilities could improve nutrition care during this important period.

Nutritional therapy among burn injured patients in the critical care setting: An international multicenter observational study on "best achievable" practices.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Burn patients pose a number of clinical challenges for doctors and dietitians to achieve optimal nutrition practice. The objective of this study was to describe nutrition practices in burn center intensive care units (ICUs) compared to the most recent ESPEN and SCCM/ASPEN guidelines (hereafter referenced as "the Guidelines") and highlight the variation in practice and what is "best achievable." METHODS: In 2014-15, we prospectively enrolled 283 mechanically ventilated patients who were admitted to one of 14 burn ICUs for at least 72 h. Data collected included information on the estimation of energy and protein requirements, their actual delivery as well as route and time of feeding, and administration of micronutrients. We describe site practices and data per patient-day. RESULTS: Adherence to the Guidelines for the use of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN) was 90.5% of patient-days (site range 79.2%-97.0%). However, adherence to the Guidelines for the measurement of energy requirements was 6.0% of patient-days (site range 0.0%-93.3%), supplementation with glutamine took place in 22.4% of patient-days (site range 0.0%-61.8%). Provision of 80% of energy requirements within 48-72 h was achieved in 35.3% of patients (site range 0.0%-80.0%), and provision of 80% of protein needs within 48-72 h was achieved in 34.3% of patients (site range 0.0%-80.0%). Average nutritional adequacy was 64.9 ± 40.0% for energy (best site: 80.2%, worst site: 42.0%) and 65.6 ± 42.1% for protein (best site: 87.3%, worst site: 43.6%). CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that despite high adherence to providing EN over PN, there is still a large gap between many recommendations and clinical practice, and the achievement of nutrition goals for patients in burn centers is suboptimal.

Nutrition therapy in critical illness: a review of the literature for clinicians.

Nutrition therapy during critical illness has been a focus of recent research, with a rapid increase in publications accompanied by two updated international clinical guidelines. However, the translation of evidence into practice is challenging due to the continually evolving, often conflicting trial findings and guideline recommendations. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis and interpretation of the adult critical care nutrition literature, with a particular focus on continuing practice gaps and areas with new data, to assist clinicians in making practical, yet evidence-based decisions regarding nutrition management during the different stages of critical illness.

Energy and protein requirements for children with CKD stages 2-5 and on dialysis-clinical practice recommendations from the Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce.

Dietary management in pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an area fraught with uncertainties and wide variations in practice. Even in tertiary pediatric nephrology centers, expert dietetic input is often lacking. The Pediatric Renal Nutrition Taskforce (PRNT), an international team of pediatric renal dietitians and pediatric nephrologists, was established to develop clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) to address these challenges and to serve as a resource for nutritional care. We present CPRs for energy and protein requirements for children with CKD stages 2-5 and those on dialysis (CKD2-5D). We address energy requirements in the context of poor growth, obesity, and different levels of physical activity, together with the additional protein needs to compensate for dialysate losses. We describe how to achieve the dietary prescription for energy and protein using breastmilk, formulas, food, and dietary supplements, which can be incorporated into everyday practice. Statements with a low grade of evidence, or based on opinion, must be considered and adapted for the individual patient by the treating physician and dietitian according to their clinical judgment. Research recommendations have been suggested. The CPRs will be regularly audited and updated by the PRNT.

[Iron deficiency syndromes and their correction with nutritional support in elderly patients with colo-rectal cancer.]

51 patients with operated colorectal cancer T1N0M0, T3N1M0 and T4N0M1 at the age of 67±2,3 years receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and nutritional support (NS) were examined. Nutritional status was assessed using alimentazione-volume diagnosis to the points on L.N.Kostyuchenko, nutritional risk - with NRI, body composition - with bioimpedance method, the iron metabolism - with basic markers (serum ferritin, transferrin saturation with iron, erythrocyte indices: erythrocyte saturation of iron, the average concentration of hemoglobin in the erythrocyte, mean corpuscular volume, hemoglobin, etc.), traditional settings, the staging of tumors - according to TNM. Iron deficiency before the development of anemia can be corrected with NS. Upon the occurrence of anemia requires additional pharmacological treatment iron supplementation, preferable with iron III hydroxide olygoisomaltazat 1000 + NS) for the prevention of toxic-metabolic complications.

Evidence on nutritional therapy practice guidelines and implementation in adult critically ill patients: a scoping review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional therapy practice guidelines are designed to improve nutritional practices and thus the delivery of nutritional therapy in critically ill patients. However, they are not implemented despite the strong recommendation of nutritional therapy in the management of critical illness. The aim of this study is to map evidence on nutritional therapy guidelines and their implementation in critically ill adult patients. METHODS: Two independent reviewers will conduct a search of published scholarly and gray literature on the implementation of nutritional therapy guidelines in critically ill adults using Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. The search of studies will be conducted from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and EBSCOhost databases, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PsychARTICLES, Health Source: Consumer Edition, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, PreMEDLINE, Joanna Briggs Institute, and Cochrane Databases for Systematic Reviews. We will follow a predetermined criterion to map literature and additional articles will be searched from the reference lists of included studies. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) will be used for quality assessment of the included studies. Quality assessment of included studies determines the overall quality of the resultant review. DISCUSSION: We hope to find studies on the implementation of nutritional therapy practice guidelines in adult critically ill patients and its impact on nutritional practices, patient outcomes, and health care costs. The results of this review will be disseminated through presentations in research seminars, conferences, and congresses and will also be available electronically and in print. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017058864.

Nutrition & Exercise Interventions in Pediatric Patients with Brain Tumors: A Narrative Review.

Brain tumors have been the most common pediatric solid tumor and leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Improved survival emphasizes the importance of adverse treatment effects especially related to nutrition and exercise. Although studies have examined nutrition and exercise outcomes, few randomized trials exist. This narrative review included a systematic literature search with analysis of controlled or single group studies examining clinical and quality-of-life impact of nutrition or exercise interventions. Seven articles were included. Three nutrition studies demonstrated improvement with proactive feeding tubes, nutritional supplementation, and nutritional status. Two exercise studies showed improvement in measures of fitness and neuroanatomy with exercise in pediatric brain tumor survivors; two cohort studies demonstrated a link between quality of life and physical activity. Preliminary studies show nutrition and exercise may improve physical well-being and quality of life, suggesting future controlled studies are warranted to inform clinical care of children with brain tumors.

Clinical Nutrition in Critical Care Medicine - Guideline of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM).

PURPOSE: Enteral and parenteral nutrition of adult critically ill patients varies in terms of the route of nutrient delivery, the amount and composition of macro- and micronutrients, and the choice of specific, immune-modulating substrates. Variations of clinical nutrition may affect clinical outcomes. The present guideline provides clinicians with updated consensus-based recommendations for clinical nutrition in adult critically ill patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring specific drug therapy and/or a mechanical support device (e.g., mechanical ventilation) to maintain organ function. METHODS: The former guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) were updated according to the current instructions of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) valid for a S2k-guideline. According to the S2k-guideline classification, no systematic review of the available evidence was required to make recommendations, which, therefore, do not state evidence- or recommendation grades. Nevertheless, we considered and commented the evidence from randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses and observational studies with adequate sample size and high methodological quality (until May 2018) as well as from currently valid guidelines of other societies. The liability of each recommendation was described linguistically. Each recommendation was finally validated and consented through a Delphi process. RESULTS: In the introduction the guideline describes a) the pathophysiological consequences of critical illness possibly affecting metabolism and nutrition of critically ill patients, b) potential definitions for different disease phases during the course of illness, and c) methodological shortcomings of clinical trials on nutrition. Then, we make 69 consented recommendations for essential, practice-relevant elements of clinical nutrition in critically ill patients. Among others, recommendations include the assessment of nutrition status, the indication for clinical nutrition, the timing and route of nutrient delivery, and the amount and composition of substrates (macro- and micronutrients); furthermore, we discuss distinctive aspects of nutrition therapy in obese critically ill patients and those treated with extracorporeal support devices. CONCLUSION: The current guideline provides clinicians with up-to-date recommendations for enteral and parenteral nutrition of adult critically ill patients who suffer from at least one acute organ dysfunction requiring specific drug therapy and/or a mechanical support device (e.g., mechanical ventilation) to maintain organ function. The period of validity of the guideline is approximately fixed at five years (2018-2023).

Guidelines for review of patients on haemodialysis: Are we meeting patient needs?

AIM: This study aimed to determine satisfaction with dietetic services, identify barriers and enablers to engaging with dietetic services and acceptable methods of delivering nutrition care to patients on haemodialysis. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on existing satisfaction surveys and key constructs from the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand patient behaviours around accessing dietetic services. Constructs were grouped according to the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) of the Behaviour Change Wheel to inform future interventions. Patients at three Brisbane haemodialysis units participated, with questionnaire administered via laptop (by dietetic assistants) or paper-based version (by nurses). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 40%, 62 ± 14 years, 58% male). Most respondents (n = 63, 95%) reported seeing a dietitian since commencing haemodialysis. A quarter of respondents reported declining or not wanting to see the dietitian. Despite this, questions pertaining to service satisfaction were largely positive. Questions related to enablers and barriers to engaging with the dietitian revealed the domain of motivation as the main barrier with 41% (n = 26) participants not wanting to make dietary changes. The domains of capability and opportunity were not barriers. Patients preferred receiving nutrition information from dietitians, when they had a question or concern, rather than at predefined intervals. Telehealth was not acceptable to the majority of participants. CONCLUSIONS: While patients were satisfied with dietetic care, their preferences for dietetic service delivery were not aligned with current evidence-based guidelines, highlighting need for alternative models of care. Dietetic interventions need to be delivered in a way that addresses motivation.

[Comprehensive approach for malnourished patients: aiming for continuity in nutritional support]. / Abordaje integral del paciente desnutrido: buscando la continuidad en el apoyo nutricional.

days of hospitalization, a greater number of complementary tests, the need for artificial nutritional support and / or drugs to treat complications, which is a very important economic burden. Most patients who are malnourished, or at risk, can benefit from oral nutritional support, which includes dietary modifications (fortification, extra snacks, etc.), prescription of a personalized diet by a registered dietitian and the use of oral nutritional supplements (ONS). The use of ONS has shown benefits, in several meta-analysis, in weight recovery, reduction in the number of complications or hospital readmissions and functional improvement, without a reduction in the usual food intake. The use of ONS is particularly cost-effective in certain subgroups of age (frail elderly), nutritional status (previous malnutrition) and underlying disease (hip fracture, abdominal surgery, etc.).On the other hand, there are additional difficulties to evaluate the effect of nutritional support in different healthcare settings (community, nursing home, hospital) since the economic burden in one environment often has an impact on another (for example: hospital readmissions). This circumstance makes it difficult for regulators to control the prescription and generates debate about the continuity of treatments in different settings. The repercussion of an episode of hospitalization on functional status, 30 days after discharge ("post hospital syndrome"), constitutes a transitory period of special vulnerability for comorbidity and hospital readmission risk. The nutritional support (dietary counselling + use of ONS) generates savings of around 5% of the health cost in the intervention group vs "usual practice", together with a significant decrease in the number of hospital readmissions. The nutritional support throughout the different scenarios where the patient is found has proven to be cost-effective, does not involve extra costs per unit of improvement, both clinical and functional, and can be defended from a health economic perspective. These results highlight the need to pay attention to the detection of malnutrition and its treatment as part of standard medical care in the transition process between the hospital and the patient's home. It is the responsibility of the health managers to ensure that the detection and treatment of malnutrition is routinely carried out in their centers, as well as integrating clinical nutrition into standardized medical care. of any patient, which raises the importance of including clinical nutrition in the training plans of the health personnel.

La principal causa de desnutrición en nuestro entorno es la enfermedad. Esta circunstancia lleva asociada un aumento en los costes derivado del aumento de los días de hospitalización, que conlleva un mayor número de pruebas complementarias y el incremento del soporte nutricional artificial y/o de medicamentos para tratar las complicaciones, lo que supone una carga económica muy importante.La mayoría de los pacientes malnutridos o en riesgo de estarlo pueden beneficiarse de apoyo nutricional por vía oral, lo que incluye modificaciones de la dieta (fortificación, snacksextras, etc.), prescripción de una dieta personalizada por una dietista y el uso eventual de suplementos nutricionales orales (SNO).Diversos metaanálisis han demostrado beneficios en el uso de SNO en la recuperación ponderal, en la disminución del número de complicaciones y de reingresos y en una mejoría funcional sin que se produzca una reducción de la ingesta habitual de alimentos. El uso de SNO es particularmente coste-efectivo en determinados subgrupos de edad (ancianos con fragilidad), estado nutricional (desnutrición previa) y enfermedad subyacente (fractura de cadera, cirugía abdominal, etc.). Por otra parte, un paciente que transita entre diferentes entornos sanitarios (centro de salud, residencia sociosanitaria, hospital de agudos) presenta dificultades añadidas para evaluar el efecto del apoyo nutricional, ya que el gasto que realizamos en un entorno repercute con frecuencia en otro (por ejemplo, en los reingresos hospitalarios). Esta circunstancia dificulta el control por parte de los agentes reguladores de la prescripción y genera el debate sobre la continuidad de los tratamientos en los diferentes escenarios. La repercusión de un episodio de hospitalización en el estado funcional a treinta días del alta ("síndrome posthospitalización") constituye un periodo transitorio de especial vulnerabilidad en episodios de comorbilidad y de riesgo de reingreso. El apoyo nutricional (consejo dietético más uso de SNO) genera ahorros de alrededor del 5% del gasto sanitario en los grupos de intervención en comparación con la práctica habitual, junto con una disminución significativa del número de reingresos hospitalarios.El apoyo nutricional a lo largo de los distintos escenarios en los que se encuentre el paciente ha demostrado ser coste-efectivo, ya que no supone costes extras por unidad de mejora, tanto clínica como funcional, por lo que puede ser defendido desde el punto de vista del gasto sanitario.Estos resultados subrayan la necesidad de prestar atención a la detección del riesgo de desnutrición y a su tratamiento como parte del cuidado médico estándar en el proceso de transición entre el hospital y el domicilio del paciente.Es responsabilidad de los gestores asegurar que en sus centros se realice de forma rutinaria la detección y el tratamiento de la malnutrición, tanto en el ámbito hospitalario como en residencias sociosanitarias y en el domicilio, así como integrar la nutrición clínica entre los cuidados médicos estandarizados de cualquier paciente, lo que plantea la importancia de incluir conocimientos en esta materia en los planes formativos del personal sanitario.

Improving the standard of nutrition care in hospital: Mealtime barriers reduced with implementation of the Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care.

BACKGROUND: Poor food intake is common in hospital patients and is associated with adverse patient and healthcare outcomes; diverse mealtime barriers to intake often undermine clinical nutrition care. AIM: This study determines whether implementation of locally adaptable nutrition care activities as part of uptake of the Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) reduced mealtime barriers and improved other patient outcomes (e.g. length of stay; LOS) when considering other covariates. METHODS: 1250 medical patients from 5 Canadian hospitals were recruited for this before-after time series design. Mealtime barriers were tallied with the Mealtime Audit Tool after a meal, while proportion of the meal consumed was assessed with the My Meal Intake Tool. Implementation of new standard care activities occurred over 12 months and three periods (pre-, early, and late) of implementation were compared. Regression analyses determined the effect of time period while adjusting for key covariates. RESULTS: Mealtime barriers were reduced over time periods (Period 1 = 2.5 S.D. 2.1; Period 3 = 1.8 S.D. 1.7) and site differences were noted. This decrease was statistically significant in regression analyses (-0.28 per time period; 95% CI -0.44, -0.11). Within and across site changes were also observed over time in meal intake and LOS; however, after adjusting for covariates, time period of implementation was not significantly associated with these outcomes. DISCUSSION: Mealtime barriers can be reduced and sustained by implementing improved standard care procedures for patients. The More-2-Eat study provides an example of how to implement changes in practice to support the prevention and treatment of malnutrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800304, June 7, 2016.

Chinese guidelines for the assessment and provision of nutrition support therapy in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: This document represents the first evidence-based guidelines to describe best practices in nutrition therapy in critically ill children (> 1 month and < 18 years), who are expected to require a length of stay more than 2 or 3 days in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit admitting medical patients domain. METHODS: A total of 25,673 articles were scanned for relevance. After careful review, 88 studies appeared to answer the pre-identified questions for the guidelines. We used the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria to adjust the evidence grade based on the quality of design and execution of each study. RESULTS: The guidelines emphasise the importance of nutritional assessment, particularly the detection of malnourished patients. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is recommended to estimate energy expenditure and there is a creative value in energy expenditure, 50 kcal/kg/day for children aged 1-8 years during acute phase if IC is unfeasible. Enteral nutrition (EN) and early enteral nutrition remain the preferred routes for nutrient delivery. A minimum protein intake of 1.5 g/kg/day is suggested for this patient population. The role of supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) has been highlighted in patients with low nutritional risk, and a delayed approach appears to be beneficial in this group of patients. Immune-enhancing cannot be currently recommended neither in EN nor PN. CONCLUSION: Overall, the pediatric critically ill population is heterogeneous, and an individualized nutrition support with the aim of improving clinical outcomes is necessary and important.

Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

BACKGROUND: The optimal nutritional therapy in the field of pancreatic surgery is still debated. METHODS: An international panel of recognized pancreatic surgeons and pancreatologists decided that the topic of nutritional support was of importance in pancreatic surgery. Thus, they reviewed the best contemporary literature and worked to develop a position paper to provide evidence supporting the integration of appropriate nutritional support into the overall management of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence were based on the approach of the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation Working Group. RESULTS: The measurement of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative assessment because malnutrition is a recognized risk factor for surgery-related complications. In addition to patient's weight loss and body mass index, measurement of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity should be considered in the preoperative evaluation because they are strong predictors of poor short-term and long-term outcomes. The available data do not show any definitive nutritional advantages for one specific type of gastrointestinal reconstruction technique after pancreatoduodenectomy over the others. Postoperative early resumption of oral intake is safe and should be encouraged within enhanced recovery protocols, but in the case of severe postoperative complications or poor tolerance of oral food after the operation, supplementary artificial nutrition should be started at once. At present, there is not enough evidence to show the benefit of avoiding oral intake in clinically stable patients who are complicated by a clinically irrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (a so-called biochemical leak), while special caution should be given to feeding patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula orally. When an artificial nutritional support is needed, enteral nutrition is preferred whenever possible over parenteral nutrition. After the operation, regardless of the type of pancreatic resection or technique of reconstruction, patients should be monitored carefully to assess for the presence of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Although fecal elastase-1 is the most readily available clinical test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, its sensitivity and specificity are low. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be initiated routinely after pancreatoduodenectomy and in patients with locally advanced disease and continued for at least 6 months after surgery, because untreated pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may result in severe nutritional derangement. CONCLUSION: The importance of this position paper is the consensus reached on the topic. Concentrating on nutritional support and therapy is of utmost value in pancreatic surgery for both short- and long-term outcomes.

Nutrition therapy for critically ill patients across the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions: A consensus statement.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidance on managing the nutritional requirements of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been issued by several international bodies. While these guidelines are consulted in ICUs across the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions, there is little guidance available that is tailored to the unique healthcare environments and demographics across these regions. Furthermore, the lack of consistent data from randomized controlled clinical trials, reliance on expert consensus, and differing recommendations in international guidelines necessitate further expert guidance on regional best practice when providing nutrition therapy for critically ill patients in ICUs in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. METHODS: The Asia-Pacific and Middle East Working Group on Nutrition in the ICU has identified major areas of uncertainty in clinical practice for healthcare professionals providing nutrition therapy in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East and developed a series of consensus statements to guide nutrition therapy in the ICU in these regions. RESULTS: Accordingly, consensus statements have been provided on nutrition risk assessment and parenteral and enteral feeding strategies in the ICU, monitoring adequacy of, and tolerance to, nutrition in the ICU and institutional processes for nutrition therapy in the ICU. Furthermore, the Working Group has noted areas requiring additional research, including the most appropriate use of hypocaloric feeding in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The objective of the Working Group in formulating these statements is to guide healthcare professionals in practicing appropriate clinical nutrition in the ICU, with a focus on improving quality of care, which will translate into improved patient outcomes.