Embolization for pediatric blunt splenic injury is an alternative to splenectomy when observation fails.

BACKGROUND: Management of splenic injury has shifted from operative to nonoperative management in both children and adults with reports of high success rates. Benefits of splenic conservation include decreased hospital stay, blood transfusion, and mortality, as well as avoidance of infectious complications. Angiography with embolization is an innovative adjunct to nonoperative management and has resulted in increased splenic salvage in adults; however, data in the pediatric population are scant. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of a single-hospital trauma registry reviewed from 1999 to 2009. Patients 18 years and younger admitted with injury to the spleen were included. Children with penetrating injury were excluded. Children were divided into three categories by initial treatment: observation, embolization, or splenectomy. Data recorded include age, radiographic grade of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Groups were analyzed for success of initial treatment, requirement for transfusion of packed red blood cells, splenic salvage, and mortality. RESULTS: Registry review identified 259 children with blunt splenic injury. Initial treatment was observation in 227, embolization in 15, and splenectomy in 17. In the observation group, 9 (4%) of 227 children failed initial treatment; 8 of these underwent embolization, while 1 unerwent splenectomy. In the embolization group, 1 (7%) of 15 failed initial treatment and underwent splenectomy. Blood transfusion was required by 38 (17%) of 227 in the observation group, 6 (40%) of 15 (p = 0.02) in the embolization group, and 15 (88%) of 17 (p < 0.01) in the splenectomy group. Overall splenic salvage rate was 237 (92%) of 259. Three children died in the observation group, and four children died in the splenectomy group. There was no death in the embolization group. CONCLUSION: Splenic artery embolization for blunt trauma in children is associated with a higher blood transfusion rate compared with observation but offers a safe, intermediate alternative to splenectomy when observation fails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Chemoembolization via branches from the splenic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the radiologic findings and imaging response of chemoembolization via branches of the splenic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From January 2001 to July 2010, we observed tumor staining supplied by branches of the splenic artery in 34 (0.6%) of 5,413 patients with HCC. Computed tomography (CT) scans and digital subtraction angiograms of these patients were retrospectively reviewed in consensus by two investigators. RESULTS: A total of 39 tumor feeding-vessels in 34 patients were identified: omental branches from the left gastroepiploic artery (n = 5), branches from the short gastric artery (n = 9), and omental branches directly from the splenic artery (n = 25). Branches of the splenic artery that supplied tumors were revealed on the celiac angiogram in 29 (85%) of 34 patients and were detected on pre-procedure CT images in 27 (79%) of 34 patients. Selective chemoembolization was achieved in 38 of 39 tumor-feeding vessels. Complete or partial response of the tumor fed by branches of the splenic artery, as depicted on follow-up CT scans, was achieved in 21 (62%) patients. No patient developed severe complications directly related to chemoembolization via branches of the splenic artery. CONCLUSIONS: Omental branches directly from the splenic artery are common tumor-feeding vessels of the splenic artery in cases of advanced HCC with multiple previous chemoembolizations. Tumor-feeding vessels of the splenic artery are usually visualized on the celiac angiogram or CT scan, and chemoembolization through them can be safely performed in most patients.

Pancreatitis after transcatheter embolization of a splenic aneurysm.

A 52-year-old woman was treated for a splenic aneurysm that was found on abdominal computed tomography (CT) during a preoperative assessment for rectal cancer. The aneurysm was embolized using the "double coil-delivered microcatheter technique," and 4 ml of a mixture of N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and iodized oil (Lipiodol) (NBCA/Lipiodol = 1.0: 2.5) were injected into the aneurysm. The patient complained of left upper quadrant abdominal pain immediately after the procedure. A blood test 2 days after the procedure showed an increased white blood cell count (13,100/microl), C-reactive protein (13.36 mg/dl), and pancreatic amylase (428 U/l). Abdominal CT scan showed a huge cystic lesion at the pancreatic tail, in the center of which was a highly enhanced area due to accumulated NBCA-Lipiodol. Postembolization pancreatitis was diagnosed, and treatment with fasting and a drip infusion of nafamostat mesilate was started. The patient's abdominal pain became less severe within 3 days, and the pancreatic enzyme level had normalized 14 days after treatment. On CT, the cystic lesion at the pancreatic tail was smaller 20 days after the procedure, and it had disappeared completely 75 days after the procedure.

[Experiences with the endovascular embolization therapy of aneurysms of the splanchnic arteries--a report on 13 cases]. / Erfahrungen mit der endovaskulären Embolisationstherapie von Aneurysmata der Splanchnikusarterien--Bericht über 13 Fälle.

PURPOSE: The authors report on their experience in endovascular embolization therapy in 13 cases with splanchnic artery aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients suffered from true aneurysms, ten patients presented pseudoaneurysms of different origin. Eight patients were transferred to our department for life-threatening intestinal bleeding. Five patients showed transpapillary bleeding, four of whom presented with haemobilia and one patient had intermittent bleeding into the pancreatic duct due to a true aneurysm of the splenic artery. Embolization was performed using a coaxial microcatheter coil delivery system. In 4 patients the aneurysm-bearing vessel was temporarily blocked during the intervention. RESULTS: In 11 patients definite occlusion of the aneurysm was obtained without surgical intervention. In one patient, suffering from a splenic aneurysm, we observed a partial inadvertent embolisation of the spleen which did not require further treatment. In one case, rupture of an hepatic aneurysm during embolization occurred. One patient with pseudoaneurysm due to displacement of a port catheter showed severe rebleeding one day after embolisation. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolization is an effective method for treatment of aneurysms of the splanchnic arteries. To avoid life-threatening bleeding due to rupture of the aneurysm, the feeding vessel should be temporarily blocked during embolization therapy.