Experience from a Singapore tertiary hospital with restructuring of a vascular surgery practice in response to national and institutional policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Singapore was one of the first countries to be affected by COVID-19, with the index patient diagnosed on January 23, 2020. For 2 weeks in February, we had the highest number of COVID-19 cases behind China. In this article, we summarize the key national and institutional policies that were implemented in response to COVID-19. We also describe in detail, with relevant data, how our vascular surgery practice has changed because of these policies and COVID-19. We show that with a segregated team model, the vascular surgery unit can still function while reducing risk of cross-contamination. We explain the various strategies adopted to reduce outpatient and inpatient volume. We provide a detailed breakdown of the type of vascular surgical cases that were performed during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare it with preceding months. We discuss our operating room and personal protective equipment protocols in managing a COVID-19 patient and share how we continue surgical training amid the pandemic. We also discuss the challenges we might face in the future as COVID-19 regresses.

A Contemporary Medicolegal Analysis of Outpatient Interventional Pain Procedures: 2009-2016.

BACKGROUND: Closed malpractice claim studies allow a review of rare but often severe complications, yielding useful insight into improving patient safety and decreasing practitioner liability. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of pain medicine malpractice claims utilizes the Controlled Risk Insurance Company Comparative Benchmarking System database, which contains nearly 400,000 malpractice claims drawn from >400 academic and community medical centers. The Controlled Risk Insurance Company Comparative Benchmarking System database was queried for January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2016, for cases with pain medicine as the primary service. Cases involving outpatient interventional pain management were identified. Controlled Risk Insurance Company-coded data fields and the narrative summaries were reviewed by the study authors. RESULTS: A total of 126 closed claims were identified. Forty-one claims resulted in payments to the plaintiffs, with a median payment of $175,000 (range, $2600-$2,950,000). Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections were the most common procedures associated with claims (n = 34), followed by cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (n = 31) and trigger point injections (n = 13). The most common alleged injuring events were an improper performance of a procedure (n = 38); alleged nonsterile technique (n = 17); unintentional dural puncture (n = 13); needle misdirected to the spinal cord (n = 11); and needle misdirected to the lung (n = 10). The most common alleged outcomes were worsening pain (n = 26); spinal cord infarct (n = 16); epidural hematoma (n = 9); soft-tissue infection (n = 9); postdural puncture headache (n = 9); and pneumothorax (n = 9). According to the Controlled Risk Insurance Company proprietary contributing factor system, perceived deficits in technical skill were present in 83% of claims. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural steroid injections are among the most commonly performed interventional pain procedures and, while a familiar procedure to pain management practitioners, may result in significant neurological injury. Trigger point injections, while generally considered safe, may result in pneumothorax or injury to other deep structures. Ultimately, the efforts to minimize practitioner liability and patient harm, like the claims themselves, will be multifactorial. Best outcomes will likely come from continued robust training in procedural skills, attention paid to published best practice recommendations, documentation that includes an inclusive consent discussion, and thoughtful patient selection. Limitations for this study are that closed claim data do not cover all complications that occur and skew toward more severe complications. In addition, the data from Controlled Risk Insurance Company Comparative Benchmarking System cannot be independently verified.

[Decision Support for the Therapy Planning for Young Refugees and Asylum-Seekers with Posttraumatic Disorders]. / Entscheidungshilfe zur Therapieplanung bei jugendlichen Flüchtlingen und Asylbewerbern mit Traumafolgestörungen in der ambulanten Praxis.

Decision Support for the Therapy Planning for Young Refugees and Asylum-Seekers with Posttraumatic Disorders Due to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and § 6 of the Asylum Seekers' Benefit Act, there are legal and ethical obligations for the care of minor refugees suffering from trauma-related disorders. In Germany, psychotherapeutic care of adolescent refugees is provided by specialized treatment centers and Child and Adolescent psychiatries with specialized consultation-hours for refugees. Treatment of minor refugees is impeded by various legal and organizational barriers. Many therapists have reservations and uncertainties regarding an appropriate therapy for refugees due to a lack of experience. This means that only a fraction of the young refugees with trauma-related disorders find an ambulatory therapist. In a review of international literature, empirical findings on (interpreter-aided) diagnostics and therapy of young refugees were presented. Practical experiences on therapeutic work with traumatized young refugees were summarized in a decision tree for therapy planning in the ambulatory setting. The decision tree was developed to support therapists in private practices by structuring the therapy process.

Community oncology in an era of payment reform.

Patients and payers (government and private) are frustrated with the fee-for-service system (FFS) of payment for outpatient health services. FFS rewards volume and highly valued services, including expensive diagnostics and therapeutics, over lesser valued cognitive services. Proposed payment schemes would incent collaboration and coordination of care among providers and reward quality. In oncology, new payment schemes must address the high costs of all services, particularly drugs, while preserving the robust distribution of sites of service available to patients in the United States. Information technology and personalized cancer care are changing the practice of oncology. Twenty-first century oncology will require increasing cognitive work and shared decision making, both of which are not well regarded in the FFS model. A high proportion of health care dollars are consumed in the final months of life. Effective delivery of palliative and end-of-life care must be addressed by practice and by new models of payment. Value-based reimbursement schemes will require oncology practices to change how they are structured. Lessons drawn from the principles of primary care's Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) will help oncology practice to prepare for new schemes. PCMH principles place a premium on proactively addressing toxicities of therapies, coordinating care with other providers, and engaging patients in shared decision making, supporting the ideal of value defined in the triple aim-to measurably improve patient experience and quality of care at less cost. Payment reform will be disruptive to all. Oncology must be engaged in policy discussions and guide rational shifts in priorities defined by new payment models.

[Access to medium and high-complexity procedures in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: a matter of judicialization]. / Acesso aos procedimentos de média e alta complexidade no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma questão de judicialização.

Lawsuits in healthcare have increased exponentially in Brazil. However, the judicialization of healthcare procedures has not been sufficiently discussed, although such a discussion could broaden the scope of healthcare assessment. This study aimed to analyze the use of court action to ensure access to outpatient and hospital procedures from 1999 to 2009 in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This was a retrospective descriptive study. Procedures were classified according to the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) and the Table on Unified Terminology for Private Healthcare. Coverage by the SUS was 93.5%. The largest proportions of beneficiaries of such lawsuits lived in the Central and Western regions of the country (26.4% and 24%, respectively). The most common procedures involved in such cases were clinical admissions, admission to intensive care, and cardiovascular surgery. The study highlights the emerging need for access to medium and high-complexity procedures through extensive rules for coverage.

Acesso aos procedimentos de media e alta complexidade no Sistema Unico de Saude: uma questao de judicializacao / Access to medium and high-complexity procedures in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: a matter of judicialization / El acceso a los procedimientos de media y alta complejidad en el Sistema Unico de Salud de Brasil: una cuestion de legalizacion

Os processos judiciais na área da saúde têm crescido de forma exponencial. A judicialização de procedimentos, no entanto, ainda não foi discutida e pode ampliar o escopo de avaliação da atenção à saúde. O objetivo deste estudo é investigar as ações judiciais para acesso a procedimentos ambulatoriais e hospitalares do Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, no período de 1999 a 2009. É um estudo descritivo retrospectivo. Os procedimentos foram classificados pela Tabela Unificada do SUS e pela Tabela de Terminologia Unificada da Saúde Suplementar. Observou-se cobertura pelo SUS de 93,6%. A residência dos beneficiários localiza-se, principalmente, nas macrorregiões Centro (26,4%) e Oeste (24%). Os procedimentos mais solicitados foram internações em leitos comuns, Centro de Terapia Intensiva e cirurgias do aparelho circulatório. Este estudo aponta para as necessidades emergentes de acesso aos procedimentos de média e alta complexidade, mediante uma extensa cobertura normativa.

Lawsuits in healthcare have increased exponentially in Brazil. However, the judicialization of healthcare procedures has not been sufficiently discussed, although such a discussion could broaden the scope of healthcare assessment. This study aimed to analyze the use of court action to ensure access to outpatient and hospital procedures from 1999 to 2009 in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This was a retrospective descriptive study. Procedures were classified according to the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) and the Table on Unified Terminology for Private Healthcare. Coverage by the SUS was 93.5%. The largest proportions of beneficiaries of such lawsuits lived in the Central and Western regions of the country (26.4% and 24%, respectively). The most common procedures involved in such cases were clinical admissions, admission to intensive care, and cardiovascular surgery. The study highlights the emerging need for access to medium and high-complexity procedures through extensive rules for coverage.

Las demandas en materia de salud han crecido de manera exponencial. La judicialización de los procedimientos, sin embargo, aún no se ha discutido y podría ampliar el alcance de la evaluación de la atención sanitaria. El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los procedimientos judiciales para el acceso a la atención ambulatoria y hospitalaria del Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, durante el período 1999-2009. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. Los procedimientos fueron clasificados por la Tabla SUS Unificada y la Mesa de Terminología Unificada de Seguros de Salud. Se observó una cobertura de un 93,6% en el SUS. La estancia de los beneficiarios estaba ubicada principalmente en el macro-centro (26,4%) y zona occidental (24%). Los procedimientos más solicitados son las admisiones para las camas de hospital, en la unidad de cuidados intensivos y cirugía del aparato circulatorio. Este estudio apunta a las nuevas necesidades de acceso, a los procedimientos de media y alta complejidad, a través de amplias normas de cobertura.

Trouble in the office: liability issues in ambulatory care.

Most clinicians are keenly aware of the liability risks associated with adverse birth outcomes for mother and/or infant. This level of awareness and concern also needs to extend to the day-to-day management of office practice. Clinicians who care for healthy women and their families may see abnormalities infrequently. The low yield of abnormal results means that close monitoring is essential to prevent overlooking the rare abnormal finding. This article focuses on three areas of liability risk for midwives and others who practice in the ambulatory setting: 1) inadequate tracking of test and referral results, 2) failure to diagnose, and 3) poor communication. Although none of these issues are limited to the ambulatory setting, only office practice is addressed in this article.

Lessons from Korea's pharmaceutical policy reform: the separation of medical institutions and pharmacies for outpatient care.

In Korea, until recently, both physicians and pharmacists were allowed to prescribe and dispense drugs for outpatient care. Along with other deep-rooted structural problems, this worked against the quality and efficiency of the health care system. To rectify this problem, the Korean government launched a drug policy reform in July 2000. However, the drug policy reform was more drastic than initially intended--driven by political factors, the reform ended up bringing about complete separation of medical institutions and pharmacies. Also, unlike in many other countries, Korea did not take a gradual approach, but instead, it implemented the reform all at once and nation-wide. As a result, the reform has faced criticism and protests, thereby generating unprecedented social turmoil and even strikes by physicians. Still, it is not clear what benefits Korea gained from this reform, when we look at the price which has had to be paid, including greater inconvenience, worsened access to medical care, increased drug spending, increased market share for multinational drug producers, and a greater deficit in the budget of the Korea's national health insurance system. Based on Korea's costly experience, we attempt to draw some policy implications for the future development of a better health care system.

Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment.

This paper reports preliminary data derived from a standardized interview scoring procedure for detecting and characterizing coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter substance abuse treatment. Coercive and noncoercive pressures stemming from multiple psychosocial domains are operationalized through recourse to established behavioral principles. Inter-rater reliability for the scoring procedure was exceptional over numerous rater trials. Substantive analyses indicate that, among clients in outpatient cocaine treatment, 'coercion' is operative in multiple psychosocial domains, and that subjects perceive legal pressures as exerting substantially less influence over their decisions to enter treatment than informal psychosocial pressures. Implications for drug treatment planning, legal and ethical issues, and directions for future research are proposed.

Normas de organización y funcionamiento de las áreas de kinesiología y fisiatría de establecimientos asistenciales: Resolución ministerial Nº 801/94

Norma de organización y funcionamiento de las áreas de kinesiología y fisiatría segun niveles de riesgo. definición, planta física, recursos humanos, equipamiento, y marco normativo de funcionamiento.