Prevalence of drug-drug interactions in sarcoma patients: key role of the pharmacist integration for toxicity risk management.

BACKGROUND: The risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) has become a major issue in cancer patients. However, data in sarcoma patients are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and the factors associated with DDI with antitumor treatments, and to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist evaluation before anticancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive sarcoma patients starting chemotherapy (CT) or Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A pharmacist performed medication reconciliation and established an early toxicity risk assessment. Potential DDI with antitumor drugs were identified using Micromedex electronic software. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two soft-tissue and 80 bone sarcoma patients (103 males, median age 50 years,) were included before CT (86%) or TKI (14%). The median number of medications was 3; 34 patients (22% of patients with medication reconciliation) reported complementary medicine use. 37 potential DDI classified as major, were identified (12% of the 243 pre-therapeutic assessments). In multivariate analysis, TKI (p < 0.0001), proton pump inhibitor (p = 0.026) and antidepressant (p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of DDI (p < 0.02). Only marital status (p = 0.003) was associated with complementary medicine use. A pharmacist performed 157 medication reconciliations and made 71 interventions among 59 patients (37%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with pharmacist intervention were: complementary medicines (p = 0.004), drugs number (p = 0.005) and treatment with TKI (p = 0.0002) CONCLUSIONS: Clinical interventions on DDI are more frequently required among sarcoma patients treated with TKI than CT. Multidisciplinary risk assessment including a medication reconciliation by a pharmacist could be crucial to prevent DDI with TKI.

Inclusion in limited distribution drug network reduces time to dalfampridine access in patients with multiple sclerosis at a health-system specialty pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Dalfampridine improves walking speed in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but accessing specialty medications such as dalfampridine can be hindered by insurance restrictions, high costs, and limited distribution networks (LDNs) imposed by manufacturers. Some integrated health-systems specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) embed pharmacists in clinics and dispense medications from their internal pharmacies if included within the LDN. OBJECTIVE: To assess access to dalfampridine in patients at an HSSP before and after gaining admission to the LDN. METHODS: This study was conducted at Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy (VSP), an integrated HSSP at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) with 2 clinical pharmacists embedded in the MS clinic. VSP gained access to the dalfampridine LDN on May 1, 2018, at which time the embedded pharmacists began to manage the comprehensive therapy initiation process. We performed a retrospective review of adult patients with MS who were prescribed dalfampridine from March 2010 to December 2018. Eligible prescriptions were new starts (no previous use) or restarts (after previous use and discontinuation). Prescriptions were classified as pre-VSP and post-VSP, which differentiates before and after VSP gained access to dispense dalfampridine. Study outcomes were insurance approval, initiation of therapy, and time from treatment decision to medication access. We used a proportional odds logistic regression model for time to medication access using the following covariates: pre-VSP versus post-VSP time period, insurance prior authorization (PA) denied versus approved/not needed, and baseline timed 25-foot walk. RESULTS: We included 262 patients and 290 prescriptions (260 pre-VSP and 30 post-VSP). In pre-VSP and post-VSP prescriptions, 97% were approved by insurance, and 93% of patients started therapy. Median time to medication access was 22 days (IQR = 11-45) for pre-VSP prescriptions and 1 day (IQR = 0-3) for post-VSP prescriptions. In the proportional odds logistic regression model, the odds of having a longer medication access time were significantly higher for pre-VSP prescriptions (OR = 83.219, P < 0.001) and prescriptions whose PA was initially denied (OR = 9.50, P < 0.001); 25-foot walk time was not significant (OR = 0.95, P = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: After obtaining access to dispense dalfampridine, the time to access therapy was reduced, suggesting that LDNs delay patient access to therapy at HSSPs. DISCLOSURES: No funding was provided for this study. The authors have no conflicting interests to disclose. Preliminary results have been previously presented at the American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacy Midyear Meeting in December 2019, the Vanderbilt Health Systems Specialty Pharmacy Outcomes Research Summit in August 2020, and the National Association of Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting in September 2020.

Drive-thru anticoagulation clinic: Can we supersize your care today?

Warfarin therapy requires maintenance of a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) and thus requires routine monitoring to ensure benefits of anticoagulation, while avoiding complications. As the pharmacist's role evolves from traditional medication dispensing towards direct patient care, many anticoagulation management services are pharmacist-managed. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare providers were faced with re-evaluating anticoagulation management practices to minimize person-to-person exposure risk. Although being anticoagulated is not considered high risk for illness from the coronavirus, these patients are often of advanced age and frequently have multiple comorbidities, putting them at increased risk. Consequently, two hospital-based, pharmacist-managed outpatient anticoagulation management services developed drive-thru curbside clinics to continue providing care to warfarin patients. The services utilized universal COVID-19 precautions to conduct curbside appointments where pharmacists determined patient's warfarin therapy plan, scheduled timely follow-up, and provided dosing instructions. With the unexpected coronavirus outbreak, this immediate change to traditional anticoagulation management was essential for safe and effective anticoagulation therapy. Implementing a curbside clinic allowed for safe distancing while managing warfarin appropriately.

Perceptions of the Value of Clinical Pharmacy Medication Review for Women During Early Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of continuing medications to prevent or treat illness is often overlooked, since pregnant women tend to overestimate the teratogenic risk of medications. Pharmacists can serve as a resource to prescribers and pregnant women with their knowledge of the appropriate use and management of medications during pregnancy. Little information exists on the value women place on pharmacists' medication management during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To assess pregnant women's perceptions of an ambulatory care clinical pharmacist (CP) medication review service during early pregnancy that provided education regarding the risks and benefits of medication use during pregnancy. METHODS: This was a qualitative study of pregnant women using semistructured telephone interviews performed between December 12, 2018, and January 18, 2019, and conducted in an integrated health care delivery system. Potential participants were identified from CP encounter records. Consented English-speaking women aged ≥ 18 years participated in an up to 30-minute interview within 1 week of the CP encounter. Interviews were professionally transcribed and coded line by line using the constant comparison method with grounded theory used to gain insight into participants' perspectives. RESULTS: 62 women were invited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews of whom 24 (39%) completed the interview. Three main themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: satisfaction with the service, comfort with medication use during pregnancy, and connectedness to the health care team. Overall, the CP medication review and education service was perceived positively by the participants. Participants reported satisfaction in the quality, timeliness, and convenience of the service and found it beneficial to have their medications reviewed early during pregnancy to assist in medication use decisions before their first obstetric visit. CONCLUSIONS: CP medication review provided a comforting, valuable service for women during early pregnancy when medication-taking decisions can feel exigent. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Kaiser Permanente. The authors have nothing to disclose. Preliminary results were presented at the Mountain States Conference for Residents and Preceptors, May 2019, in Salt Lake City, UT.

Impact of pharmacy technicians as part of an integrated health-system pharmacy team on improvement of medication access in the care of cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease requiring patients to take multiple medications per day. Multiple barriers exist affecting access and adherence. Studies have demonstrated the positive outcomes of pharmacist involvement in CF care. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact of pharmacy technicians on medication access in the care of CF patients. METHODS: A retrospective review and analysis of patient medication profiles for patients followed by the integrated pharmacy care process model was performed. Two electronic prescription pathways with pharmacy technician involvement were analyzed. One pathway using a specialty pharmacy CF pharmacy technician (SP technician) examined CF specialty medication delivery times. The other pathway examined the impact of the clinic-based CF pharmacy technician (CB technician) on the number of filling pharmacies for patients. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria in the CF specialty medication delivery analysis, and 56 patients met inclusion criteria filling pharmacy analysis. The median delivery time for dornase alfa decreased from 8 days to 3 days, p < .00001. The number of patients utilizing one filling pharmacy increased from 8 (14%) to 21 (38%) (p = .005); and utilizing three filling pharmacies decreased from 14 (25%) to 1 (2%) (p = .003). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that pharmacy technicians as part of an integrated health-system pharmacy care process model improve medication access in the care of CF patients.

Medication Therapy Management: 10 Years of Experience in a Large Integrated Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Medication therapy management (MTM) was officially recognized by the federal government in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, which requires Medicare Part D plans that offer prescription drug coverage to establish MTM programs (MTMPs) for eligible beneficiaries. Even though the term "MTM" was first used in 2003, pharmacists have provided similar services since the term "pharmaceutical care" was introduced in 1990. Fairview Health Services, a large integrated health care system, implemented a standardized pharmaceutical care service system in 1998, naming it a pharmaceutical care-based MTM practice in 2006. OBJECTIVE: To present the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of 10 years of delivering MTM services to patients in a health care delivery system. METHODS: Data from MTM services provided to 9,068 patients and documented in electronic therapeutic records were retrospectively analyzed over the 10-year period from September 1998 to September 2008 in 1 health system with 48 primary care clinics. Patients eligible for MTM services were aged 21 years or older and either paid for MTM out of pocket or met their health care payer's criteria for MTM reimbursement; the criteria varied for Medicaid, Medicare, and commercially insured enrollees. All MTM was delivered face to face. Health data extracted from the electronic therapeutic record by the present study's investigators included patient demographics, medication list, medical conditions, drug therapy problems identified and addressed, change in clinical status, and pharmacist-estimated cost savings. The clinical status assessment was a comparison of the first and most recent MTM visit to measure whether the patient achieved the goals of therapy for each medical condition (e.g., the blood pressure of a patient with diabetes and hypertension will be less than 130/80 millimeters mercury [mmHg] in 1 month; the patient with allergic rhinitis will be relieved of his complaints of nasal congestion, runny nose, and eye itching within 5 days). Goals were set according to evidence-based literature and patient-specific targets determined cooperatively by pharmacists, patients, and physicians. Cost-savings calculations represented MTM pharmacists' estimates of medical services (e.g., office visits, laboratory services, urgent care visits, emergency room visits) and lost work time avoided by the intervention. All short-term (3-month) estimated health care savings that resulted from addressing drug therapy problems were analyzed. The expenses of these avoided services were calculated using the health system's contracted rates for services provided in the last quarter of 2008. The return on investment (ROI) was calculated by dividing the pharmacist-estimated savings by the cost of MTM services in 2008 (number of MTM encounters times the average cost of an MTM visit). The humanistic impact of MTM services was assessed using the results from the second patient satisfaction survey administered in 2008 (new patients seen from January through December 2008) for the health system's MTM program. RESULTS: A total of 9,068 patient records were in the documentation system as of September 30, 2008. During the 10-year period, there were 33,706 documented encounters (mean 3.7 encounters per patient). Of 38,631 drug therapy problems identified and addressed by MTM pharmacists, the most frequent were a need for additional drug therapy (n = 10,870, 28.1%) and subtherapeutic dosage (n = 10,100, 26.1%). In the clinical status assessment of the 12,851 medical conditions in 4,849 patients who were not at goal when they enrolled in the program, 7,068 conditions (55.0%) improved, 2,956 (23.0%) were unchanged, and 2,827 (22.0%) worsened during the course of MTM services. Pharmacist-estimated cost savings to the health system over the 10-year period were $2,913,850 ($86 per encounter) and the total cost of MTM was $2,258,302 ($67 per encounter), for an estimated ROI of $1.29 per $1 in MTM administrative costs. In the patient satisfaction survey, 95.3% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their overall health and well-being had improved because of MTM. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist estimates of the impact of an MTM program in a large integrated health care system suggest that the program was associated with improved clinical outcomes and cost savings. Patient satisfaction with the program was high. DISCLOSURES: There was no external funding for this manuscript. The 3 authors are employees of Fairview Pharmacy Services. Ramalho de Oliveira had primary responsibility for the concept and design, writing, and revision of the manuscript, with the assistance of Brummel and Miller. Ramalho de Oliveira performed the data collection, and all 3 authors shared equally in data interpretation.

Different models of pharmaceutical services and care in primary healthcare clinics in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: Challenges and opportunities for pharmacy practice.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) re-engineering forms a crucial part of South Africa's National Health Insurance (NHI), with pharmaceutical services and care being crucial to treatment outcomes. However, owing to a shortage of pharmacists within PHC clinics, task-shifting of the dispensing process to pharmacist's assistants and nurses is common practice. The implications of this task-shifting process on the provision of pharmaceutical services and care remains largely unstudied. AIM: The study aimed to explore the pharmacist-based, pharmacist's assistant-based and nurse-based dispensing models within the PHC setting. SETTING: The Nelson Mandela Bay Health District, South Africa. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was utilised comprising of Phase 1: a pharmaceutical services audit to analyse pharmaceutical service provision and Phase 2: semi-structured interviews to describe the pharmaceutical care provision within each dispensing model thematically. RESULTS: Pharmaceutical services partially fulfilled minimum standards within all models, however, challenges exist that limit the quality of these services. Phase 2 showed that the provision of pharmaceutical care within all models was restricted by context-related constraints, thus patient-centred activities to underpin pharmaceutical services were limited. CONCLUSION: Although pharmaceutical services may have been available for all models, compromised quality of these services impacted overall quality of care. Limited pharmaceutical care provision was evident within each dispensing model. The results raised concerns about the current utilisation of pharmacy personnel, including the pharmacist, within the PHC setting. Further opportunities exist, if constraints allow, for the pharmacist to contribute to better patient-centred care.

[Retrocession, a risk area in care pathway]. / Les rétrocessions, une zone à risque dans le parcours des patients.

OBJECTIVES: Medication errors are common at transitions points in care pathway. The pharmacist can secure patient care in "retrocession" (dispensing specific drugs by hospital pharmacy to outpatient) due to his prescription analysis (both regulatory and pharmacotherapeutic). The "retrocession" is a risk area in care pathway. The objective of this study is to evaluate iatrogenic and economic risks in "retrocession" dispense by identifying pharmaceutical interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study performed during 8months in university hospital. All the prescriptions have been analyzed and divided into 3 categories: "first prescription" (a new prescription for a new treatment or a new patient), continued therapy with new prescription and prescription renewal. Therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions performed have been systematically recorded. RESULTS: Among 7166 prescriptions analyzed, 161 pharmaceutical interventions (2.2%) are done. The highest rate of therapeutic optimizations and regulatory pharmaceutical interventions concern the "first prescription" category (9.3%). The most involved drugs in medication errors on a "first prescription" are cancer drugs (36%) and anti-infectives (24%). CONCLUSION: The first dispensation in "retrocession" is the riskiest step, especially with pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Thanks to pharmacist counseling sessions, especially in oncology, this risk is better controlled. This study demonstrates the interest of developing pharmacist counseling sessions for the treatment's introduction regardless of therapeutic class.

Characterization of drug-related problems and associated factors in ambulatory patients in China.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and the type of drug-related problems (DRPs) in ambulatory patients and identify factors that may be associated with risk of DRPs. METHODS: Consecutive patients were enrolled from pharmacist outpatient clinics between January 2018 and June 2019. The pharmacists performed a comprehensive assessment of the patient's drug therapy. The DRPs and recommendations were evaluated using the DOCUMENT classification system. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The study population consisted of 248 patients with a mean age of 72.55 ± 6.29. The patients had a mean of 7.55 ± 4.72 ongoing medications during patients' routine clinic visits. A total of 1188 DRPs were identified during the study period. An average of 4.79 DRPs per patient was detected. Sixty-two different traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) contributed to 102 DRPs. Drug selection (24.9%) was the most common DRP followed by under treated (24.2%) and monitoring needed (24.2%). The number of medications taken was the significant factor for DRPs. Pharmacists made 1092 recommendations to address the DRPs (an average 0.92 recommendations per DRP). A change in therapy was the most common recommendation (43.6%), followed by the category 'monitoring' (28.6%). The overall acceptance rate of clinical pharmacist recommendations was 88.7%. More than a half (51.6%) of all interventions were assigned a moderate level of clinical significance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Drug-related problems were commonly observed among ambulatory Chinese patients. Clinical pharmacists had a valuable role to play in identifying and solving the DRPs.

Satisfaction and experiences of patients taking fingolimod and involved in a pharmacy-based patient support program in Switzerland - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod is an oral multiple sclerosis drug that is considered a specialty drug due to its high cost and safety issues. The Fingolimod Patient Support Program (F-PSP) is a specialty pharmacy service developed to ensure the responsible use of fingolimod by promoting patient safety and medication adherence. This study aims to explore the satisfaction, experiences and perceptions regarding the F-PSP among patients currently involved in this program or recently withdrawn. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted via individual, face-to-face semistructured interviews with patients involved in the F-PSP. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analyzed via thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The main themes identified from the interviews (n = 17) were overall perception of the F-PSP, perception of the pharmacist-led consultations, perception of the tools (electronic monitor and drug intake graph), reasons to participate or potentially withdraw, and suggestions for improvements. Participants perceived the F-PSP as a reassuring support that complemented their medical care, providing a more human, personalized and person-centered approach than usual pharmacy care. Pharmacist-led consultations were valued for the medication-related and holistic support they provided. The importance of the pharmacist's attitude was emphasized. The electronic monitor was valued for promoting daily medication adherence and allowing the involvement of relatives, which reassured participants and their relatives. The participants appreciated the drug intake graph because it provided an objective overview of medication adherence, thereby reassuring, rewarding, and motivating them. The main reason to join the program was to be supported, especially with respect to medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were satisfied with the F-PSP, each for different reasons. Their feedback enabled the identification of measures for the optimization of the F-PSP and should facilitate its dissemination and transfer to other drugs/diseases/populations. Essential elements of generic pharmacist-led patient support programs considered valuable from the patients' perspective were identified.

[Strategy of pharmaceutical care services for clinical Chinese pharmacists in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)].

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) seriously endangers people's health. Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) has been recommended for the treatment of COVID-19 in Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Prevention and Control Strategy, which have made outstanding contributions to the prevention and control of the epidemic. The wide application of Chinese medicine asked the pharmacists and doctors, nurses, and medical technicians in Wuhan and around the country to stand on the front line of COVID-19 treatment, and provide pharmaceutical care services, which has effectively guaranteed the safety and rational use of Chinese medicine. This article will introduce the TCM cognition of the COVID-19, analyze the clinical application of Chinese medicine and the entry point of pharmaceutical care, and clarify that clinical Chinese pharmacists can participate in making medication therapy plan, medication reconciliation, and prescription review, promoting rational drug use, pharmaceutical monitoring, and drug risk management. The participation of clinical Chinese pharmacists in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is conducive to improving the level of rational use of TCM, by ensuring the effectiveness, and safety.

A framework to increase prescription capture from health-system clinics.

PURPOSE: To develop and implement an interprofessional framework to increase the capture of health system-generated prescriptions within health system-owned pharmacies. SUMMARY: Low prescription capture rates within a health system's internal pharmacies led to an interdisciplinary process improvement effort. A framework was developed to assess the baseline prescription capture rate, select clinics for improvement, understand clinic workflows and key drivers of pharmacy selection, design strategies to increase prescription capture, implement targeted efforts, and measure the effectiveness of the intervention(s). Employing this framework provided revised workflows for nursing and medical assistant staff scripting and for referral of patients to internal pharmacies. These workflows were pilot tested at 3 system clinics. Results indicated that overall prescription capture increased by 2.9 to 4.1 percentage points (range, 10 to 86 prescriptions per month) and specialty prescription capture increased by 11.6 to 26.7 percentage points (range, 4 to 26 prescriptions per month) for each clinic within the first 2 months. A total of 99 new patients were referred to internal pharmacies within the first month. CONCLUSION: Development and implementation of a framework to increase prescription capture from health system clinics helped increase capture, enhanced clinic engagement and knowledge about pharmacy services, and supported positive clinic-pharmacy relationships.

AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?

Digital therapeutics (DTx)-software that delivers a clinical mechanism of action, either alone or in combination with other standard-of-care treatments to improve outcomes-is an emerging class of therapeutic interventions that poses many questions for the health care system. To examine the systems and processes that will support the adoption and utilization of DTx, AMCP convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder forum September 17-18, 2019, in Alexandria, Virginia. The goals of the forum were to (a) describe DTx and how managed care organizations evaluate their value; (b) identify where DTx fits within a covered benefit; (c) outline evidentiary standards needed for coverage of DTx; and (d) outline how payers and managed care organizations may leverage DTx for value-based care and patient engagement. Health care leaders representing academia, health plans, integrated delivery systems, DTx manufacturers and industry leaders, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacy benefit managers, employers, federal government agencies, national health care provider organizations, and patient advocacy organizations participated in the forum. Participants identified characteristics of DTx to develop a better understanding of the spectrum of solutions and how they are distinct from other digital health products, such as mobile health devices, monitoring, care coordination, or electronic health records. The evidence needed to evaluate DTx will likely be tiered based on its medical claim or function and should align with standards for clinical evidence. Clinical evidence must be evaluated by appropriate health authorities (e.g., the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and receive market authorization (e.g., clearance, approval) with a regulatory label. Various benefit coverage options were discussed. While some participants suggested that the unique features of DTx could be best addressed by a novel digital benefit, others argued that creating an additional benefit would result in further health care system fragmentation. They observed that the increasing focus on compensating providers for outcomes supports integrating DTx within existing benefit structures. They noted that some DTx might be more appropriate for the medical benefit and others might be better aligned with the pharmacy benefit. Finally, many participants observed that, while additional DTx-specific education may be needed, pharmacists are trained to have the knowledge and skills that make them well suited to play a key role in guiding appropriate use of DTx. DISCLOSURES: This AMCP forum was sponsored by Akili Interactive Labs, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead, Lovongo, MedRhythms Therapy, Merck & Co., metaMe Health, MindSciences, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pear Therapeutics, Precision for Value, Sandoz, Sanofi, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Xcenda. These proceedings were prepared as a summary of the forum to represent common themes; they are not necessarily endorsed by all attendees nor should they be construed as reflecting group consensus. Cynthia Reilly, MS, BSPharm, correspondent, is an employee of AMCP and declares no conflicts of interest, real or apparent, with any product or service mentioned in this report.

Implementing California Senate Bill 493 in an Outpatient Pharmacy Within an Integrated Health System: Evaluation of the Operational and Clinical Effect of Pharmacist-Ordered Laboratory Tests.

BACKGROUND: Under California Senate Bill 493, pharmacists can order patient laboratory tests (labs). Currently, it is unknown if this service affects patient outcomes or pharmacy operations. Does lab ordering by pharmacists improve access to care, improve quality outcomes, and/or affect pharmacy operational functions? PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: A 13-month pilot study was conducted at 2 Kaiser Permanente (KP) outpatient pharmacies where pharmacists provided extended adherence consultations and ordered hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) labs for patients nonadherent to their oral diabetic medications with an HbA1c ≥ 8% or missing annual labs. Clinical outcomes of the pilot study were compared with a similar patient population at KP who concurrently received lab orders from their primary providers, defined here as the "usual care model." OBSERVATION: Of the 793 HbA1c lab orders, 87 (11.0%) were generated by a pharmacist, and 706 (89.0%) were generated by the usual care group. Forty-three (49.4%) patients in the pharmacist group completed their labs compared with 279 (39.5%) patients in the usual care group (P = 0.10). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the pharmacist group achieved an HbA1c < 8% within the follow-up period of 30-180 days (34.9%), compared with the usual care group (12.2%, P < 0.01). Of the patients who completed labs during the evaluation period, 38 (43.7%) patients in the pharmacist group and 111 (15.7%) patients in the usual care group had prelaboratory values ≥ 8% within the previous 12 months. The average pre-HbA1c value was 9.47% in the pharmacist group, and the average post-HbA1c value was 8.68% (P < 0.01). For the usual care group, the average pre-HbA1c value was 9.70%, and the average post-HbA1c value was 9.43% (P = 0.06). When comparing the difference in HbA1c reduction between the 2 groups, there was a larger decrease in HbA1c in the pharmacist group, but this difference was not significantly different (P = 0.06). The pilot study added an average of 5 minutes per patient encounter to the pharmacy workflow but did not affect overall patient wait times for receiving outpatient prescriptions. IMPLICATIONS: Laboratory ordering by pharmacists in the outpatient setting improved access to care, improved quality outcomes, and did not adversely affect pharmacy operations. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this project. The authors have nothing to disclose.

The Effect of an Integrated Health System Specialty Pharmacy on HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence, Viral Suppression, and CD4 Count in an Outpatient Infectious Disease Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy is critical in order to achieve and maintain viral suppression and improve immune function. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacies focused on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have demonstrated the ability to increase ARV medication adherence and subsequently have a positive effect on these lab markers. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of an integrated health system specialty pharmacy service with a clinic-embedded, HIV-trained pharmacist and pharmacy technician on ARV medication adherence rate, viral load, and CD4 count. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted from August 7, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at an indigent outpatient infectious disease clinic within Atrium Health (AH), a not-for-profit health system based in Charlotte, NC. The intervention group (opt-in group) received HIV patient care that involved the health system specialty pharmacy service. Once a patient was enrolled in the specialty pharmacy service, medication reconciliation was completed by the pharmacist, financial assistance and prior authorizations were completed if needed; prescriptions were delivered to the patient; and monthly refills calls were conducted to assess adherence, tolerability, and medication changes. The control group (opt-out group) received HIV patient care that did not incorporate the health system specialty pharmacy. The primary endpoints were medication adherence, viral suppression, and CD4 counts. Within-group comparisons from baseline to follow-up were made along with group-to-group comparisons. Adherence was calculated using medication possession ratio. RESULTS: For those patients using Atrium Health Specialty Pharmacy Service (AH SPS; n = 46), the overall median adherence rate was higher at 100% versus only 94% for those patients (n = 50) that opted out of the service (P < 0.01). All but 3 patients (21.7% at baseline vs. 6.5% at follow-up, P = 0.03) using AH SPS reached viral suppression, and all but 1 had improved immune function with a CD4 count of 200 or greater by the end of the observation period (P = 0.03). The change in viral suppression and CD4 count of 200 or greater was not statistically improved between baseline and follow-up in those opting out of using AH SPS. When comparing the 2 groups at reaching these endpoints, there was no statistically significant difference in viral suppression and CD4 count. CONCLUSIONS: AH SPS was able to demonstrate improved ARV adherence in those patients using an integrated specialty pharmacy with an embedded pharmacy team, coordinated monthly medication delivery, and refill reminder and adherence calls. This in turn led to improved viral suppression and immune markers by the end of the observation window for patients using AH SPS. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Evaluation of pharmacist interventions in a head and neck medical oncology clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck cancers (HNC) are a complex and heterogeneous group of cancers, often necessitating a multidisciplinary approach across the care continuum. Oncology pharmacists are uniquely qualified to play a vital role on a multidisciplinary team and provide specialized care to optimize medication therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review evaluating the role of a board-certified oncology pharmacist in the head and neck oncology clinic at an academic, comprehensive cancer center from April 2017 through March 2018. The primary objective of the study was to describe the types of interventions made by the oncology pharmacists. Secondary objectives included quantifying time spent on patient education and number of prescriptions sent to pharmacies. RESULTS: The pharmacist had 873 encounters with 151 patients, resulting in 2080 interventions. Approximately 57% of the interventions were performed in the clinic. Patient education (58%), facilitation of new prescriptions or refill requests (49.9%), and supportive care management (32.6%) were the most frequent interventions. The oncology pharmacist spent 154.1 h on patient education and sent 811 prescriptions to pharmacies, with 63.6% of prescriptions sent to the institution's cancer center pharmacy. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of an oncology pharmacist in the HNC team optimized patient care through comprehensive and timely interventions across the care continuum. Our study is the first to highlight the vital role oncology pharmacists have in improving the overall quality of care of HNC patients. Future directions include exploring the impact of oncology pharmacist interventions on select Quality Oncology Practice Initiative measures by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

A simple method to identify undiagnosed drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and its application in oncology pharmacy practice.

AIMS: To establish a simple method to identify chemotherapy-induced liver injury among oncological patients. To evaluate current clinical approach to elevated laboratory liver test results. METHODS: A total of 289 patients admitted to oncology department who had systemic chemotherapy episodes for cancer treatment from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 were identified. With aid of healthcare information system, Hy's law was applied to laboratory liver test results to identify potential hepatocellular drug-induced liver injury cases. Medical record review was carried out among identified patients to exclude liver dysfunction of alternative causes. Current clinical approach to elevated laboratory liver tests was evaluated through medical record review. RESULTS: Of 289 patients who were treated by systemic chemotherapies, there were 123 patients with elevated laboratory liver tests, among which 8 patients were suspected as potential Hy's law cases. After medical record review, there were two patients determined with chemotherapy-associated liver injury, caused by 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and S-1 plus paclitaxel separately. Of eight potential Hy's law cases, seven (87.5%) patients were prescribed with ≥2 kinds of liver protectants and remained treated with traditional Chinese medicine for decoction. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable and simple method to identify undiagnosed drug-induced liver injury was successfully established. An annual incidence of 0.69% of chemotherapy-associated liver injury in oncology department of the setting was found.

Reflections on the ISPOR Special Task Force on U.S. Value Frameworks: Implications of a Health Economics Approach for Managed Care Pharmacy.

In 2016, The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) formed a special task force (STF) to review approaches and methods to support the definition and use of high-quality U.S. value frameworks. As the leadership group of that initiative, we present our perspective, focusing on implications for the managed care pharmacy community. Our reflections are organized by 9 key observations and conclude with a summary recommendation. We begin by emphasizing the importance of distinguishing among "perspectives" and "decision contexts." Possible perspectives include patient, payer, provider, health care sector, and societal. Decision contexts range from formulary inclusion to guideline development to clinical shared decision making, and multiple perspectives can be taken on each of these decisions. The STF focused on value in the context of including a new medicine in a formulary and, thus, health plan, using a health economics approach that compares marginal benefit (gross value) and marginal (opportunity) cost, yielding the net value. Health care is unique compared with other markets. While economists often use market purchases as indicators of value, they also recognize that this does not work well in health care, since most patent-protected drugs are covered by insurance. To assess the likely health and economic impact, health economists often employ cost-effectiveness analysis, using the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a metric that combines mortality and morbidity into a single preference-based index. We strongly endorse the STF's recommendation that payers should use the cost-per-QALY metric as a starting point. However, like the STF, and many of those stakeholders who provided input, we recognize that this metric has some limitations in theory and in practice. Nonetheless, the cost-per-QALY metric is a pragmatic tool that can be augmented to address some of its limitations by integrating other elements of value, particularly those related to uncertainty, such as financial risk protection, health risk protection, the value of hope, real option value, and the value of knowing. The resulting adjusted ratio can be compared with a willingness-to-pay threshold or combined in a measure of net monetary benefit. Alternatively, the array of elements can be valued using multi-criteria decision analysis. We end with the key recommendation that further development and testing of these promising approaches is needed to improve the deliberative process of health technology assessment. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported the writing of this article. The authors are leaders of the ISPOR Special Task Force on U.S. Value Frameworks. Willke is employed by ISPOR. Garrison and Neumann have nothing to disclose. The opinions expressed in this article should be considered as belonging only to the authors.

Current interventions to promote safe and appropriate pain management.

PURPOSE: Describe patient-, clinician-, system-, and community-level interventions for pain management developed and employed by 9 healthcare systems across the United States and report on lessons learned from the implementation of these interventions. SUMMARY: The high cost associated with pain coupled with the frequent use of opioid analgesics as primary treatment options has made novel pain management strategies a necessity. Interventions that target multiple levels within healthcare are needed to help combat the opioid epidemic and improve strategies to manage chronic pain. Patient-level interventions implemented ranged from traditional paper-based educational tools to videos, digital applications, and peer networks. Clinician-level interventions focused on providing education, ensuring proper follow-up care, and establishing multidisciplinary teams that included prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. System- and community-level interventions included metric tracking and analytics, electronic health record tools, lockbox distribution for safe storage, medication return bins for removal of opioids, risk assessment tool utilization, and improved access to reversal agents. CONCLUSION: Strategies to better manage pain can be implemented within health systems at multiple levels and on many fronts; however, these changes are most effective when accepted and widely used by the population for which they are targeted.

The pharmacist's role in health information, vaccination and health promotion.

On the subject of vaccination, owing to complex issues connected to vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy, the pharmacist is seen as a professional figure in the health sector who is qualified to improve social accountability with the aim of increasing the consent. In order to provide accurate information, Law no. 119/2007 has confirmed the central role of the pharmacist in the promotion of prophylactic vaccination, explicitly stating under art. 2 that the Ministry will be able to count on the collaboration of pharmacists as well as general practitioners and paediatricians. Pharmacists are pinpointed as new professional figures who could assist the national health service in its vaccine awareness and administration campaigns. Art. 5 comma 1 of Law no.119/2017 states that to meet vaccine goals, each Region will be able to allow vaccines to be booked through the Italian booking system (CUP) and administered free-of-charge in authorized pharmacies.