Clinical Audit of Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Adolescents and Adults with Medulloblastoma.

Purpose: Medulloblastomas, comprising 20%-25% of all primary brain tumors in children are much rarer in adulthood. Disease biology varies substantially across different age groups; however, owing to rarity, adults with medulloblastoma are traditionally treated using pediatric protocols. This is a retrospective audit of adolescent and adult medulloblastoma from a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Data regarding demography, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, histopathological features, molecular profiling, risk stratification, treatment details, and outcomes were retrieved from medical records. All time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of relevant prognostic factors was done with p value <0.05 being considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 162 patients ≥15 years of age with medulloblastoma were included. The median age was 25 years (range: 15-59 years) with leptomeningeal metastases seen in 31 (19%) patients at initial diagnosis. Following surgery, patients were treated with appropriate risk-stratified adjuvant therapy comprising of craniospinal irradiation plus boost with or without systemic chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 50 months, 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 53.5% and 59.5%, respectively. The addition of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy did not impact upon survival in standard-risk medulloblastoma. High-risk (HR) disease and anaplastic histology emerged as significant and independent predictors of poor survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Medulloblastoma is a rare tumor in adolescents and adults with key differences in disease biology and resultant outcomes compared with the pediatric population. Contemporary management comprising maximal safe resection followed by appropriate risk-stratified adjuvant therapy provides acceptable survival outcomes.

Hidden labour: the skilful work of clinical audit data collection and its implications for secondary use of data via integrated health IT.

BACKGROUND: Secondary use of data via integrated health information technology is fundamental to many healthcare policies and processes worldwide. However, repurposing data can be problematic and little research has been undertaken into the everyday practicalities of inter-system data sharing that helps explain why this is so, especially within (as opposed to between) organisations. In response, this article reports one of the most detailed empirical examinations undertaken to date of the work involved in repurposing healthcare data for National Clinical Audits. METHODS: Fifty-four semi-structured, qualitative interviews were carried out with staff in five English National Health Service hospitals about their audit work, including 20 staff involved substantively with audit data collection. In addition, ethnographic observations took place on wards, in 'back offices' and meetings (102 h). Findings were analysed thematically and synthesised in narratives. RESULTS: Although data were available within hospital applications for secondary use in some audit fields, which could, in theory, have been auto-populated, in practice staff regularly negotiated multiple, unintegrated systems to generate audit records. This work was complex and skilful, and involved cross-checking and double data entry, often using paper forms, to assure data quality and inform quality improvements. CONCLUSIONS: If technology is to facilitate the secondary use of healthcare data, the skilled but largely hidden labour of those who collect and recontextualise those data must be recognised. Their detailed understandings of what it takes to produce high quality data in specific contexts should inform the further development of integrated systems within organisations.

Results of the IROCA international clinical audit in prostate cancer radiotherapy at six comprehensive cancer centres.

To assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of patients undergoing prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy in four European countries using clinical audits as part of the international IROCA project. Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 240 randomly-selected patients treated for PCa (n = 40/centre) in the year 2015 at six European hospitals. Clinical indicators applicable to general and PCa-specific radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained directly from medical records. The audits were performed in the year 2017. Adherence to clinical protocols and practices was satisfactory, but with substantial inter-centre variability in numerous variables, as follows: staging MRI (range 27.5-87.5% of cases); presentation to multidisciplinary tumour board (2.5-100%); time elapsed between initial visit to the radiation oncology department and treatment initiation (42-102.5 days); number of treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day (7.5-97.5%). The most common deviation from standard clinical practice was inconsistent data registration, mainly failure to report data related to diagnosis, treatment, and/or adverse events. This clinical audit detected substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practice, most notably inconsistent record keeping. These findings confirm the value of performing clinical audits to detect deviations from standard clinical practices and procedures.

Local audit of empiric antibiotic therapy in bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if a local audit would be useful in providing guidance on how to improve local practice of empiric antibiotic therapy. We performed an audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia to evaluate the proportion and risk factors for inadequate empiric antibiotic coverage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with positive blood cultures across 3 hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada during October of 2019. Antibiotic therapy was considered empiric if it was administered within 24 hours after blood culture collection. Adequate coverage was defined as when the isolate from blood culture was tested to be susceptible to the empiric antibiotic. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to predict inadequate empiric coverage. Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical pathway based on patient risk factors was compared to clinician's decision in predicting which bacteria to empirically cover. RESULTS: Of 201 bacteremia cases, empiric coverage was inadequate in 56 (27.9%) cases. Risk factors for inadequate empiric coverage included unknown source at initiation of antibiotic therapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.76 95% CI 1.27-6.01, P = 0.010) and prior antibiotic therapy within 90 days (aOR of 2.46 95% CI 1.30-4.74, P = 0.006). A clinical pathway that considered community-associated infection as low risk for Pseudomonas was better at ruling out Pseudomonas bacteremia with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95% CI 0.03-1.10) compared to clinician's decision with negative likelihood ratio of 0.34 (95% CI 0.10-1.22). CONCLUSIONS: An audit of antibiotic therapy in bacteremia is feasible and may provide useful feedback on how to locally improve empiric antibiotic therapy.

Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement in an Integrated Community Urology Practice: Lessons Learned.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of 2 different continuous quality improvement interventions in an integrated community urology practice. We specifically assessed the impact of audited physician feedback on improving physicians' adoption of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) and adherence to a prostate biopsy time-out intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The electronic medical records of Genesis Healthcare Partners were analyzed between August 24, 2011 and September 30, 2020 to evaluate the performance of 2 quality interventions: audited physician feedback to improve active surveillance adoption in low-risk CaP patients, and audited physician feedback to promote adherence to an electronic medical records embedded prostate biopsy time-out template. Physician and Genesis Healthcare Partners group adherence to each quality initiative was compared before and after each intervention type using ANOVA testing. RESULTS: For active surveillance, we consistently saw an increase in active surveillance adoption for low risk CaP patients in association with continuous audited feedback (P < .001). Adherence to the prostate biopsy time-out template improved when audited feedback was provided (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of clinical guidelines into routine clinical practice remains challenging and poses an obstacle to the improvement of United States healthcare quality. Continuous quality improvement should be a dynamic process, and in our experience, audited feedback coupled with education is most effective.

Implementation of strategies to improve nutritional intervention for patients with cancer treatment-related oral mucositis: a best practice implementation project.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is a common complication after radiotherapy or chemotherapy in cancer patients. Oral mucositis can affect the patient's food intake and their confidence in treatment as patients are more likely to suffer severe pain, experience weight loss, encounter an interruption or change of cancer treatment plan, and are reported to have a reduced survival from the disease. Nutritional intervention is the primary nursing focus in patients with oral mucositis treated by chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The current best practice implementation project aimed to establish best practice principles in nutritional interventions for patients with cancer treatment-related oral mucositis. METHODS: This was an evidence-based audit and feedback project that used a three-phase approach at a public hospital in China. Phase 1 involved developing five evidence-based audit criteria informed by current best available evidence, and undertaking a clinical audit of current practice on 50 patients in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Nanfang Hospital using the JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System. Phase 2 utilized the Getting Research into Practice component of the Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System to identify barriers to compliance with best practice principles and developed strategies and resources to improve compliance. Phase 3 involved conducting a postaudit using the same sample size and audit criteria to re-evaluate compliance with best practice. RESULTS: Baseline results showed that compliance rates were 0% for criteria 1 and 2, 76% for criteria 3 and 5, and 82% for criterion 4. The implementation of strategies, including establishing a multidisciplinary team with a dietitian, creating training and education programs for all staff and patients, utilizing a scale regarding diet to assess patients' current diet, and establishing a nutrition intervention nursing procedure to supervise implementation of the nutritional intervention for patients with cancer treatment-related oral mucositis, increased compliance with best practice, achieving compliance rates of at least 82% for all five audit criteria. CONCLUSION: The implementation of context-specific strategies improved compliance with evidence-based practice in the nutritional intervention for patients with cancer treatment-related oral mucositis. Sustainability of best practice is important, with further audits planned to evaluate the sustainability of these practice changes.

Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in surgery: Results of a targeted audit in a large-scale region-based French hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: While regional monitoring of antibiotic use has decreased since 2011 by 3.2%, in some healthcare facilities a significant increase (+43%) has occurred. The purpose of this study was to assess regional antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) compliance with national guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2015, 26 healthcare facilities, both public and private, were requested to audit five items: utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis, the antimicrobial agent (the molecule) administered, time between injection and incision, initial dose, number of intraoperative and postoperative additional doses. Seven surgical procedures were selected for assessment: appendicectomy (APP), cataract (CAT), cesarean section (CES), colorectal cancer surgery (CCR), hysterectomy (HYS), total hip arthroplasty (THA) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A statistical analysis of the 2303 records included was carried out. RESULTS: The general rate of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was 64%. The antimicrobial agent used and initial dose were in compliance with the guidelines for 93% and 97.4% of cases respectively, and administration of antibiotic prophylaxis was achieved 60minutes before incision in 77.6% of the records included. Regarding gastrointestinal surgery, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was used in 32% of patients. In 26% of appendectomy files, administration occurred after incision, and one out of two files showed non-complaint perioperative and postoperative consumption. CONCLUSION: Compliance with nationwide ABP guidelines is in need of pronounced improvement, especially with regard to time interval between injection and incision and the molecule prescribed. An action plan based on specific recommendations addressed to each establishment and an updated regionwide ABP protocol are aimed at achieving better and reduced consumption of antimicrobial agents.

Medication-related problems among hospitalized pregnant women in a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on medication-related problems (MRPs) among pregnant women are scarce, despite the potential consequences for both mother and child. This study aimed to describe the prevalence, clinical significance, and risk factors for MRPs among hospitalized pregnant or postpartum women at Jimma University Medical Centre (JUMC) in Ethiopia. METHODS: A prospective follow-up and clinical audit of 1117 hospitalized pregnant or postpartum women in the maternity and gynaecology wards at JUMC was carried out between February and June 2017. Patients were followed throughout their stay in the hospital to assess the presence and development of MRPs. Pre-tested data extraction form and an interview-guided structured questionnaire were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used to describe MRPs. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with MRPs. RESULTS: One or more MRPs occurred among 323 (28.9%) study participants, mostly in relation to lack of iron supplementation. A total of 278 (70.6%) of all MRPs were considered to be of moderate to high clinical significance. When excluding MRPs due to iron from the analysis, chronic disease (adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.02, 3.58), medication use prior to admission (adjusted OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.24, 4.56), nulliparity (adjusted OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.22, 3.24) and multiparity (adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.17, 3.12) were significantly associated with experiencing an MRP. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 3 out of 10 hospitalized pregnant women at JUMC had one or more MRPs. The need for additional iron therapy was by far the most common type of MRP. Improved adherence to guidelines on iron supplementation are required. Multidisciplinary approaches including physicians, nurses, anesthesia professionals and clinical pharmacists in the maternity and gynaecology wards could possibly prevent MRPs and promote patient safety for women and children.

Finding the match between healthcare worker and expert for optimal audit and feedback on antimicrobial resistance prevention measures.

BACKGROUND: The potentials of audit and feedback (AF) to improve healthcare are currently not exploited. To unlock the potentials of AF, this study focused on the process of making sense of audit data and translating data into actionable feedback by studying a specific AF-case: limiting antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This was done via audit and feedback of AMR prevention measures (APM) that are executed by healthcare workers (HCW) in their day-to-day contact with patients. This study's aim was to counterbalance the current predominantly top-down, expert-driven audit and feedback approach for APM, with needs and expectations of HCW. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were held with sixteen HCW (i.e. physicians, residents and nurses) from high-risk AMR departments at a regional hospital in The Netherlands. Deductive coding was succeeded by open and axial coding to establish main codes, subcodes and variations within codes. RESULTS: HCW demand insights from audits into all facets of APM in their working routines (i.e. diagnostics, treatment and infection control), preferably in the form of simple and actionable feedback that invites interdisciplinary discussions, so that substantiated actions for improvement can be implemented. AF should not be seen as an isolated ad-hoc intervention, but as a recurrent, long-term, and organic improvement strategy that balances the primary aims of HCW (i.e. improving quality and safety of care for individual patients and HCW) and AMR-experts (i.e. reducing the burden of AMR). CONCLUSIONS: To unlock the learning and improvement potentials of audit and feedback, HCW' and AMR-experts' perspectives should be balanced throughout the whole AF-loop (incl. data collection, analysis, visualization, feedback and planning, implementing and monitoring actions). APM-AF should be flexible, so that both audit (incl. collecting and combining the right data in an efficient and transparent manner) and feedback (incl. persuasive and actionable feedback) can be tailored to the needs of various target groups. To balance HCW' and AMR-experts' perspectives a participatory holistic AF development approach is advocated.

Different models of pharmaceutical services and care in primary healthcare clinics in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: Challenges and opportunities for pharmacy practice.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) re-engineering forms a crucial part of South Africa's National Health Insurance (NHI), with pharmaceutical services and care being crucial to treatment outcomes. However, owing to a shortage of pharmacists within PHC clinics, task-shifting of the dispensing process to pharmacist's assistants and nurses is common practice. The implications of this task-shifting process on the provision of pharmaceutical services and care remains largely unstudied. AIM: The study aimed to explore the pharmacist-based, pharmacist's assistant-based and nurse-based dispensing models within the PHC setting. SETTING: The Nelson Mandela Bay Health District, South Africa. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was utilised comprising of Phase 1: a pharmaceutical services audit to analyse pharmaceutical service provision and Phase 2: semi-structured interviews to describe the pharmaceutical care provision within each dispensing model thematically. RESULTS: Pharmaceutical services partially fulfilled minimum standards within all models, however, challenges exist that limit the quality of these services. Phase 2 showed that the provision of pharmaceutical care within all models was restricted by context-related constraints, thus patient-centred activities to underpin pharmaceutical services were limited. CONCLUSION: Although pharmaceutical services may have been available for all models, compromised quality of these services impacted overall quality of care. Limited pharmaceutical care provision was evident within each dispensing model. The results raised concerns about the current utilisation of pharmacy personnel, including the pharmacist, within the PHC setting. Further opportunities exist, if constraints allow, for the pharmacist to contribute to better patient-centred care.

Compliance to immediate newborn care practice among midwives working in maternity wards: a best practice implementation project.

BACKGROUND: The WHO has a series of comprehensive care instructions to improve the health of newborns from prior to conception, throughout pregnancy, soon after birth and in the postnatal period. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this best practice implementation project was to promote evidence-based best practice of immediate newborn care practice among midwives working in the maternity ward. METHODS: Baseline and postimplementation audits were conducted using the JBI Practical Application of Evidence System using nine audit criteria for immediate newborn care. The gaps and barriers were analyzed using Getting Research into Practice strategies based on the baseline audit result. Discussion was conducted on the identified gaps and the implementation strategies. RESULTS: A total of 94 cases were observed for both a baseline and follow-up audit. We found that follow-up compliance rates for all criteria were improved compared with the baseline audit. For instance, criterion 5 improved from 26% during baseline to 96% during follow-up audit, and the overall average compliance at baseline was 58% and for the postimplementation audit was 96%. CONCLUSION: The current project revealed that training of the health professionals and presenting evidence summaries to them were strategies that resulted in improved compliance to best available evidence to immediate newborn care.

Promoting correct positioning and attachment in breastfeeding infants born by section cesarean in the La Fe Hospital in Spain: a best-practice implementation project.

AIM: The aim of this project was to assess compliance with evidence-based criteria that set out effective techniques for ensuring correct positioning and attachment in breastfeeding infants delivered by cesarean section in the La Fe University and Polytechnical Hospital of Valencia, Spain. METHODS: The current clinical pre/post audit was conducted in a convenience sample with no control group. First, five audit criteria from the JBI framework and Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System program were selected to assess correct positioning and attachment during breastfeeding. We then conducted a baseline audit to determine the degree of compliance with these criteria. Second, we used the Getting Research into Practice guidelines to help us identify obstacles to fulfillment of each criterion and to design and implement various strategies to improve compliance. Third, a follow-up audit was performed and the degree of compliance of each criterion was determined again. Finally, the barriers to implementation of the strategies were identified. RESULTS: Eighty-seven mothers and 20 midwives participated in the baseline audit and 93 mothers and 17 midwives took part in the follow-up audit. After implementation, the rates of compliance with the three maternal criteria (2, 3, and 4) significantly improved. These were guidance to women, breastfeeding support, and encouragement from families, which increased by 42, 49, and 51%, respectively. Furthermore, criterion 4 (professional training programs) reached 100% compliance. However, criterion 1 (skin-to-skin contact) only increased by 2%. Eight barriers were described, including a lack of knowledge of the skin-to-skin procedure, a hands-on approach to breastfeeding support, a lack of time or high workload, and differences in the breastfeeding support provided by different professionals. Implementing strategies such as assessment with the LATCH scale, continuing the support of breastfeeding mothers through working shift changes, and promoting the skin-to-skin procedure, proved to be effective. CONCLUSION: The current audit project significantly improved all our evidence-based criteria used to promote correct positioning and attachment during breastfeeding in women who had given birth by cesarean section. We accomplished this goal by developing several strategies which were accepted and implemented by all the midwives involved. Early, adequate, and ongoing support for breastfeeding women during postpartum hospitalization was key to the success of this project. It will be important to improve the skin-to-skin parameter in the surgical block in the near future to further consolidate and improve these results.

Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes.

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), impacting outcomes. Despite publication of nutrition care evidence-based guidelines (EBGs), evidence-practice gaps exist. This study aimed to implement and evaluate the integration of a patient-centred, best-practice dietetic model of care into an HNC multidisciplinary team (MDT) to minimise the detrimental sequelae of malnutrition. A mixed-methods, pre-post study design was used to deliver key interventions underpinned by evidence-based implementation strategies to address identified barriers and facilitators to change at individual, team and system levels. A data audit of medical records established baseline adherence to EBGs and clinical parameters prior to implementation in a prospective cohort. Key interventions included a weekly Supportive Care-Led Pre-Treatment Clinic and a Nutrition Care Dashboard highlighting nutrition outcome data integrated into MDT meetings. Focus groups provided team-level evaluation of the new model of care. Economic analysis determined system-level impact. The baseline clinical audit (n = 98) revealed barriers including reactive nutrition care, lack of familiarity with EBGs or awareness of intensive nutrition care needs as well as infrastructure and dietetic resource limitations. Post-implementation data (n = 34) demonstrated improved process and clinical outcomes: pre-treatment dietitian assessment; use of a validated nutrition assessment tool before, during and after treatment. Patients receiving the new model of care were significantly more likely to complete prescribed radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Differences in mean percentage weight change were clinically relevant. At the system level, the new model of care avoided 3.92 unplanned admissions and related costs of $AUD121K per annum. Focus groups confirmed clear support at the multidisciplinary team level for continuing the new model of care. Implementing an evidence-based nutrition model of care in patients with HNC is feasible and can improve outcomes. Benefits of this model of care may be transferrable to other patient groups within cancer settings.

Behavioral Health Integration and Outcomes that Matter to Patients: a Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Observational Study.

Research on behavioral health integration (BHI) often explores outcomes for quality and cost, but less is known about impacts of integration work on key patient experience outcomes. A mixed-methods longitudinal study of BHI was conducted in 12 primary care clinics in Oregon to assess how adoption of key integration practices including integrated staffing models, integrated care trainings for providers, and integrated data sharing impacted a set of patient experience outcomes selected and prioritized by an advisory panel of active patients. Results showed that adopting key aspects of integration was not associated with improved patient experience outcomes over time. Patient interviews highlighted several potential reasons why, including an overemphasis by health systems on the structural aspects of integration versus the experiential components and potential concerns among patients about stigma and discrimination in the primary care settings where integration is focused.

Head and neck cancer in Styria : An epidemiologic and clinical audit.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with cancer of the head and neck is significantly improved by increased interdisciplinary cooperation. The main focus of this study was a comparison of epidemiologic factors (age, sex, origin, staging) of patients with head and neck cancer in Styria, with those for patients throughout Austria. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of collected archived tumor board protocols of the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Graz included the patient's age, sex, area of residence, TNM stage, reasons for inoperability, comorbidities and performance status by ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), was performed. This study focuses on 340 patients who presented with a head and neck malignancy for the first time. RESULTS: In the period from January 2014 to December 2015 a total of 252 men (74.1%) and 88 women (25.9%) with malignant head and neck tumors, were presented in the tumor board for the first time. The mean age at diagnosis was 63.4 years. In 45.5% the patients already demonstrated advanced tumor stages (T4 = 27.9%, T3 = 17.6%). Most newly diagnosed neoplasms were cancers of the oropharynx (24.1%), larynx (19.4%) and oral cavity (18.8%) and 36.5% were considered to be inoperable. Curative and palliative treatments were initiated in 83.2% and 16.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The region of south Styria showed a higher incidence of T3 and T4 tumors of the oropharynx than the average Austrian population. Measures to increase awareness of this problem should be initiated to support general otorhinolaryngologists and general practitioners in detecting oropharyngeal cancers at an earlier stage.

Reducing caesarean delivery: An economic evaluation of routine induction of labour at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women.

BACKGROUND: Clinical interventions known to reduce the risk of caesarean delivery include routine induction of labour at 39 weeks, caseload midwifery and chart audit, but they have not been compared for cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To assesses the cost-effectiveness of three different interventions known to reduce caesarean delivery rates compared to standard care; and conduct a budget impact analysis. METHODS: A Markov microsimulation model was constructed to compare the costs and outcomes produced by the different interventions. Costs included all costs to the health system, and outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. A budget impact analysis was undertaken using this model to quantify the costs (in Australian dollars) over three years for government health system funders. RESULTS: All interventions, plus standard care, produced similar health outcomes (mean of 1.84 QALYs gained over 105 weeks). Caseload midwifery was the lowest cost option at $15 587 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15 269, 15 905), followed by routine induction of labour ($16 257, 95% CI 15 989, 16 536), and chart audit ($16 325, 95% CI 15 979, 16 671). All produced lower costs on average than standard care ($16 905, 95% CI 16 551, 17 259). Caseload midwifery would produce the greatest savings of $172.6 million over three years if implemented for all low-risk nulliparous women in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Caseload midwifery presents the best value for reducing caesarean delivery rates of the options considered. Routine induction of labour at 39 weeks and chart audit would also reduce costs compared to standard care.

Benefit of Sequential Audit Cycles in Improving Management of Vitamin D Deficiency in the HIV Infected Paediatric Population

Aims Lifelong HIV infection has an unknown impact on bone health in children. In view of this, we aimed to improve management of vitamin D deficiency. Methods Three audits over 8 years (2009-2017) were performed with interventions introduced intermittently in an effort to improve vitamin D deficiency. The interventions included education, a change in vitamin D dose and brand to increase compliance and a shift to nursing led management. Results The most striking result was the eradication of patients with deficient vitamin D levels (<25nmol/L) in 2017. In 2009 and 2015, 15% and 9% were deficient. In the earlier two studies, only 15% had 'sufficient' (>50nmol) vitamin D levels. This increased to 71% in 2017. 10% of patients had levels greater than >120nmol/L, increasing risk of vitamin D toxicity. 67% of patients with insufficient vit D (25-50nmol/L) were prescribed a stat high dose vitamin D (120,000 IU) to help avoid adherence issues. Conclusions Sequential audits along with a shift to nurse led management were the most likely reasons for sustained improvement. Similar projects in all medical departments could improve clinical outcomes.

[Retrospective study of the impact of training on the management of immediate post-partum hemorrhage]. / Impact d'une formation sur la prise en charge de l'hémorragie du post-partum.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the introduction of training workshops on the quality of prevention and management of Post-Partum Hemorrhage (PPH) in a type III university center. METHODS: A clinical audit was carried out in our type III university center before and after the introduction of training workshops on the prevention and management of PPH, in two periods between January 1st to December 31st 2011 and March 1st and August 1st, 2015. Training workshops were according to the recommendations for clinical practice of the National College of Gynecologists-Obstetricians French published in 2014, and included a theoretical portion and a simulation of low fidelity manikin. Data on the management of patients presenting with PPH after vaginal birth of a singleton were retrospectively collected consecutively from medical records. Data were collected using a standardized analytical grid. Between the two data collections, some improvement actions were implemented. RESULTS: After implementation of training workshops, the proportion of patients with active management of the third stage of labor (prophylactic uterotonic after delivery) has significantly improved (72% before, vs. 92% after, P=0.001); time to PPH diagnosis has been significantly higher notified (40% before, vs. 94% after, P<0.001), as well as the quantification of bleeding at diagnosis (46% before, vs. 72% after, P<0.003) and total bleeding (68% before, vs. 92%, P<0.001). PPH-specific monitoring sheet was found to be used significantly more frequently (3 before, vs. 30 after, P=0.00015). Additionally, the Physician Anesthesiologist has been contacted significantly more often (34% before, vs. 53% after, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights a significant improvement in professional practices between 2011 and 2015 on PPH prevention and management in our type III university center.

Protein Provision in Critically Ill Adults Requiring Enteral Nutrition: Are Guidelines Being Met?

BACKGROUND: In a previous audit, 81% of enteral protein prescriptions failed to meet protein guidelines. To address this, a very high-protein enteral formula and protein supplements were introduced, and protein prescriptions were adjusted to account for nonnutrition energy sources displacing enteral formula. This follow-up audit compared protein provision in critically ill adults requiring exclusive enteral nutrition (EN), first, with local and international guidelines, and second, after changes to practice, with the previous audit in the same intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Data were collected from 106 adults consecutively admitted to the ICU of a U.K. tertiary hospital and requiring exclusive EN ≥3 days. Protein targets based on local guidelines (1.25, 1.5, or 2.0 g/kg/d), nutrition prescription, and delivery were recorded for 24 hours between days 1-3, 5-7, 8-10, and 18-20 post-ICU admission. RESULTS: The proportion of day 1-3 protein prescriptions meeting protein targets increased from 19% in 2015 to 69% in 2017 (P < .0005, φ = 0.50). The median percentage of protein target delivered was lower than prescribed (79% vs 103%; (P < .0005; r = 0.53) and EN delivery only met the target of 22% of patients. The proportion of protein prescriptions meeting protein targets was similar for days 1-3 (69%), 5-7 (71%), and 8-10 (68%), but increased slightly by days 18-20 (74%). The proportion of patients for which EN delivery met protein targets increased with the number of days post-ICU admission (22%, 26%, 37%, and 53% for days 1-3, 5-7, 8-10, and 18-20, respectively). CONCLUSION: The proportion of protein prescriptions meeting guideline targets was higher after changes to practice.

An Audit of Neural Tube Defects in the Republic Of Ireland for 2012-2015.

Neural tube defects (NTD) are potentially preventable in two-thirds of cases by periconceptional maternal Folic Acid (FA) supplementation. A national audit for the years 2009-11 showed no decline in NTD rates over twenty years. The aim of this national audit was to determine trends/rates and inform revision of national FA supplementation and food fortification strategies. Of 274,732 live and stillbirths there were 121(42.0%) cases of anencephaly, 136(47.2%) cases of spina bifida and 31(10.8%) cases of encephalocoele giving a total of 288 and overall rate of 1.05/1000 compared with 1.04/1000 in 2009-11(NS). In the 184 women where the information was available, only 29.9%(n=55) reported starting FA before pregnancy. The number of cases diagnosed antenatally was 91%(n=262) and 53%(n=154) were live-born. This audit confirms that over a generation, healthcare interventions have not succeeded in decreasing the number of pregnancies in Ireland complicated by NTD, and that revised strategies need to be developed and implemented.