Effects of Bedtime Dosing With Suvorexant and Zolpidem on Balance and Psychomotor Performance in Healthy Elderly Participants During the Night and in the Morning.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: This study was designed as an early assessment of the safety of the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant, but also included exploratory assessments of balance and psychomotor performance that are the focus of this report. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This was a double-blind, randomized, 3-period, crossover, phase 1 study. Balance and psychomotor performance were evaluated during the night in 12 healthy elderly participants after bedtime administration of suvorexant 30 mg (a supratherapeutic dose), the GABAergic agonist zolpidem 5 mg (the recommended dose in the elderly), or placebo. Balance (body sway measured by platform stability) and psychomotor performance (measured by choice reaction time) were assessed predose and at 1.5, 4, and 8 hours postdose in each period. Memory (measured by word recall) was assessed predose and at 4 hours postdose. FINDINGS/RESULTS: At 1.5 hours after nighttime administration of each drug (the approximate time of their anticipated maximal plasma concentrations), both zolpidem and suvorexant increased body sway versus placebo, with a greater increase for zolpidem than suvorexant. Suvorexant increased choice reaction time compared with placebo or zolpidem at 1.5 hours. There were no treatment differences on body sway or choice reaction time at 4 or 8 hours, or on word recall at 4 hours. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory data suggest that a 30-mg dose of suvorexant (supratherapeutic) and a 5-mg dose of zolpidem (recommended dose in the elderly) impaired balance at 1.5 hours in healthy elderly people, with potentially less impairment for suvorexant relative to zolpidem, but no treatment differences on body sway or psychomotor performance at 4 and 8 hours. Because of their exploratory nature, these findings and their clinical relevance, if any, require confirmation in a prospective study.

Prompt improvement of difficulty with sleep initiation and waking up in the morning and daytime somnolence by combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder: a case series of three patients.

Patients with delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (DSWPD) suffer from difficulties in sleep initiation at night, difficulties in waking up at the socially required time, and daytime somnolence. About half of the patients resist conventional light therapy and melatonin therapy. Therapy using hypnotics is not recommended due to its adverse effects. Recently, suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, has become available for clinical use. The drug is relatively safer than traditional hypnotics such as benzodiazepines. We report three DSWPD patients who were successfully treated by the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon. The first case was a 19-year-old woman who was experiencing difficulties in sleep initiation, difficulty in waking up in the morning, and daytime somnolence. She showed a prompt response to the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon. Her sleep phase advanced, and her daytime somnolence reduced. The second and third cases were 21-year-old and 17-year-old men, respectively, who also showed significant sleep phase advances. Although case 2 was resistant to ramelteon treatment, his sleep phase advanced after suvorexant started. His difficulty in falling asleep and his habit of daytime napping disappeared after the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon was started. Case 3 also showed a prompt response. His difficulties in falling asleep and waking up in the morning were ameliorated immediately after suvorexant with ramelteon was started. No obvious side effects were observed. Therapy using the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon might be a reasonable option for DSWPD patients.

Pharmacotherapies for sleep disturbances in dementia.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances, including reduced nocturnal sleep time, sleep fragmentation, nocturnal wandering, and daytime sleepiness are common clinical problems in dementia, and are associated with significant carer distress, increased healthcare costs, and institutionalisation. Although non-drug interventions are recommended as the first-line approach to managing these problems, drug treatment is often sought and used. However, there is significant uncertainty about the efficacy and adverse effects of the various hypnotic drugs in this clinically vulnerable population. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects, including common adverse effects, of any drug treatment versus placebo for sleep disorders in people with dementia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, on 19 February 2020, using the terms: sleep, insomnia, circadian, hypersomnia, parasomnia, somnolence, rest-activity, and sundowning. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a drug with placebo, and that had the primary aim of improving sleep in people with dementia who had an identified sleep disturbance at baseline. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data on study design, risk of bias, and results. We used the mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measures of treatment effect, and where possible, synthesised results using a fixed-effect model. Key outcomes to be included in our summary tables were chosen with the help of a panel of carers. We used GRADE methods to rate the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We found nine eligible RCTs investigating: melatonin (5 studies, n = 222, five studies, but only two yielded data on our primary sleep outcomes suitable for meta-analysis), the sedative antidepressant trazodone (1 study, n = 30), the melatonin-receptor agonist ramelteon (1 study, n = 74, no peer-reviewed publication), and the orexin antagonists suvorexant and lemborexant (2 studies, n = 323). Participants in the trazodone study and most participants in the melatonin studies had moderate-to-severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD); those in the ramelteon study and the orexin antagonist studies had mild-to-moderate AD. Participants had a variety of common sleep problems at baseline. Primary sleep outcomes were measured using actigraphy or polysomnography. In one study, melatonin treatment was combined with light therapy. Only four studies systematically assessed adverse effects. Overall, we considered the studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias. We found low-certainty evidence that melatonin doses up to 10 mg may have little or no effect on any major sleep outcome over eight to 10 weeks in people with AD and sleep disturbances. We could synthesise data for two of our primary sleep outcomes: total nocturnal sleep time (TNST) (MD 10.68 minutes, 95% CI -16.22 to 37.59; 2 studies, n = 184), and the ratio of day-time to night-time sleep (MD -0.13, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.03; 2 studies; n = 184). From single studies, we found no evidence of an effect of melatonin on sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset, number of night-time awakenings, or mean duration of sleep bouts. There were no serious adverse effects of melatonin reported. We found low-certainty evidence that trazodone 50 mg for two weeks may improve TNST (MD 42.46 minutes, 95% CI 0.9 to 84.0; 1 study, n = 30), and sleep efficiency (MD 8.53%, 95% CI 1.9 to 15.1; 1 study, n = 30) in people with moderate-to-severe AD. The effect on time awake after sleep onset was uncertain due to very serious imprecision (MD -20.41 minutes, 95% CI -60.4 to 19.6; 1 study, n = 30). There may be little or no effect on number of night-time awakenings (MD -3.71, 95% CI -8.2 to 0.8; 1 study, n = 30) or time asleep in the day (MD 5.12 minutes, 95% CI -28.2 to 38.4). There were no serious adverse effects of trazodone reported. The small (n = 74), phase 2 trial investigating ramelteon 8 mg was reported only in summary form on the sponsor's website. We considered the certainty of the evidence to be low. There was no evidence of any important effect of ramelteon on any nocturnal sleep outcomes. There were no serious adverse effects. We found moderate-certainty evidence that an orexin antagonist taken for four weeks by people with mild-to-moderate AD probably increases TNST (MD 28.2 minutes, 95% CI 11.1 to 45.3; 1 study, n = 274) and decreases time awake after sleep onset (MD -15.7 minutes, 95% CI -28.1 to -3.3: 1 study, n = 274) but has little or no effect on number of awakenings (MD 0.0, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5; 1 study, n = 274). It may be associated with a small increase in sleep efficiency (MD 4.26%, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.26; 2 studies, n = 312), has no clear effect on sleep latency (MD -12.1 minutes, 95% CI -25.9 to 1.7; 1 study, n = 274), and may have little or no effect on the mean duration of sleep bouts (MD -2.42 minutes, 95% CI -5.53 to 0.7; 1 study, n = 38). Adverse events were probably no more common among participants taking orexin antagonists than those taking placebo (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.99; 2 studies, n = 323). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We discovered a distinct lack of evidence to guide decisions about drug treatment of sleep problems in dementia. In particular, we found no RCTs of many widely prescribed drugs, including the benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, although there is considerable uncertainty about the balance of benefits and risks for these common treatments. We found no evidence for beneficial effects of melatonin (up to 10 mg) or a melatonin receptor agonist. There was evidence of some beneficial effects on sleep outcomes from trazodone and orexin antagonists and no evidence of harmful effects in these small trials, although larger trials in a broader range of participants are needed to allow more definitive conclusions to be reached. Systematic assessment of adverse effects in future trials is essential.

Safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in cataract and LASIK surgery patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% as antibacterial prophylaxis in the surgical setting. METHODS: Two prospective safety surveillance studies were conducted-one in the cataract surgery setting and the other in the laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery setting. Cases from patients aged 18 years and above were eligible for inclusion. In both surveillance studies, data were collected from consecutive cases of routine primary cataract surgery and LASIK surgery, respectively, in which besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% or moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% was used as the topical perioperative prophylactic antibacterial medication as part of the clinician's routine standard of care. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: The cataract surgery surveillance study included 485 cases/eyes (besifloxacin, n = 333; moxifloxacin, n = 152), whereas the LASIK surveillance study included 456 cases/eyes (besifloxacin, n = 344; moxifloxacin, n = 112). In the cataract study, only 1 TEAE was reported in a besifloxacin case (mild hypersensitivity/allergic reaction considered possibly related to besifloxacin). No TEAEs were reported in the LASIK study. In both studies, surgical outcomes were similar with both treatments. The frequency of preoperative and/or postoperative dosing was generally lower for besifloxacin than that for moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: In prospective safety surveillance studies of patients undergoing cataract extraction or LASIK, TEAEs associated with prophylactic use of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% were rare, and surgical outcomes with besifloxacin were similar to those with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%.

Glucose hypermetabolism in the thalamus of patients with drug-induced blepharospasm.

We examined the difference in cerebral function alterations between drug-induced blepharospasm patients and essential blepharospasm (EB) patients by using positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Cerebral glucose metabolism was examined in 21 patients with drug-induced blepharospasm (5 men and 16 women; mean age, 53.1 [range, 29-78] years), 21 essential EB patients (5 men and 16 women; mean age, 53.0 [range, 33-72] years) and 24 healthy subjects (6 men and 18 women; mean age, 57.9 [range, 22-78] years) with long-term history of benzodiazepines use (drug healthy subjects). Drug-induced blepharospasm patients developed symptoms while taking benzodiazepines or thienodiazepines. Sixty-three normal volunteers (15 men and 48 women; mean age, 53.6 [range, 20-70] years) were examined as controls. Differences between the patient groups and control group were examined by statistical parametric mapping. Additionally, we defined regions of interests on both sides of the thalamus, caudate nucleus, anterior putamen, posterior putamen and primary somatosensory area. The differences between groups were tested using two-sample t-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Cerebral glucose hypermetabolism on both side of the thalamus was detected in drug-induced blepharospasm, EB patients and drug healthy subjects by statistical parametric mapping. In the analysis of regions of interest, glucose metabolism in both sides of the thalamus in the drug-induced blepharospasm group was significantly lower than that in the EB group. Moreover, we observed glucose hypermetabolism in the anterior and posterior putamen bilaterally in EB group but not in drug-induced blepharospasm group and drug healthy subjects. Long-term regimens of benzodiazepines or thienodiazepines may cause down-regulation of benzodiazepine receptors in the brain. We suggest that the functional brain alteration in drug-induced blepharospasm patients is similar to that in EB patients, and that alteration of the GABAergic system might be related to the pathology of both blepharospasm types.

Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension, 0.6%: a novel topical fluoroquinolone for bacterial conjunctivitis.

Acute bacterial conjunctivitis, the most common cause of conjunctivitis, is responsible for approximately 1% of all primary-care consultations. Of the topical ophthalmic antibiotics used to treat acute bacterial conjunctivitis, fluoroquinolones are especially useful because they possess a broad antibacterial spectrum, are bactericidal in action, are generally well tolerated, and have been less prone to development of bacterial resistance. Besifloxacin, the latest advanced fluoroquinolone approved for treating bacterial conjunctivitis, is the first fluoroquinolone developed specifically for topical ophthalmic use. It has a C-8 chlorine substituent and is known as a chloro-fluoroquinolone. Besifloxacin possesses relatively balanced dual-targeting activity against bacterial topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase (topoisomerse II), two essential enzymes involved in bacterial DNA replication, leading to increased potency and decreased likelihood of bacterial resistance developing to besifloxacin. Microbiological data suggest a relatively high potency and rapid bactericidal activity for besifloxacin against common ocular pathogens, including bacteria resistant to other fluoroquinolones, especially resistant staphylococcal species. Randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical studies demonstrated the clinical efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered three-times daily for 5 days to be superior to the vehicle alone and similar to moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for bacterial conjunctivitis. In addition, besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% administered two-times daily for 3 days was clinically more effective than the vehicle alone for bacterial conjunctivitis. Besifloxacin has also been shown in preclinical animal studies to be potentially effective for the "off-label" treatment of infections following ocular surgery, prophylaxis of endophthalmitis, and the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Taken together, clinical and preclinical animal studies indicate that besifloxacin is an important new option for the treatment of ocular infections.

QT effect of semagacestat at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses.

OBJECTIVE: This thorough QT/ QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) study was designed to assess the potential of semagacestat, a functional gamma-secretase inhibitor, to delay cardiac repolarization. METHODS: In this Phase I, single-dose, randomized, 4-period crossover study, semagacestat was compared with placebo in 54 healthy male and female subjects between the ages of 19 and 63 years, inclusive. Each study period included single oral-dose administrations of semagacestat 140 mg, semagacestat 280 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, or placebo. Study subjects and the investigator were blinded to the identity of semagacestat and placebo; however, moxifloxacin was administered as open-label. Moxifloxacin was compared with placebo for assay sensitivity analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: For each QTc, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least squares mean difference between semagacestat (at both the 140- and 280-mg dose levels) and placebo was < 10 msec at all time points, and thus, within the limits set for clinical relevance in regulatory guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that single doses of 140 and 280 mg semagacestat did not prolong QTc to a clinically significant degree.

Besifloxacin: a topical fluoroquinolone for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Besifloxacin is a topical ophthalmic fluoroquinolone that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2009 for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis caused by susceptible bacterial strains. OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview of the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of ophthalmic besifloxacin when used for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: Relevant reports pertaining to the pharmacology, efficacy, and tolerability of besifloxacin were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1985-December 2009) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1985-December 2009) using the terms besifloxacin, BOL-303224-A, ophthalmic fluoroquinolones, and bacterial conjunctivitis. Additional publications were identified by reviewing the reference lists of identified articles and searching the FDA Web site. RESULTS: Besifloxacin has potent in vitro inhibitory activity against most common ocular bacterial pathogens (MIC90 values generally < or =4 microg/mL), including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae. In an ocular pharmacokinetic study in 64 healthy volunteers, the C(max) in tears (mean [SD], 610 [540] microg/mL) was reached 10 minutes after a single ocular instillation of besifloxacin; concentrations > or =1.6 microg/g of tear were sustained for at least 24 hours; and the elimination t(1/2) was ~3.4 hours. In a study in 24 patients with a clinical diagnosis of bilateral bacterial conjunctivitis, systemic exposure (C(max)) after administration of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 3 times daily for 5 days was <0.5 ng/mL. In 2 randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled clinical trials, besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension was well tolerated and significantly more efficacious than vehicle in achieving clinical resolution (73.3% vs 43.1%, respectively, in one of the studies [P < 0.001]; 45.2% vs 33.0% in the other [P = 0.008]) and microbial eradication (88.3% vs 60.3% [P < 0.001] and 91.5% vs 59.7% [P < 0.001], respectively). In a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, noninferiority trial comparing besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%, besifloxacin was found to be noninferior to moxifloxacin (predefined cutoff for noninferiority = -15), with no significant differences in rates of clinical resolution (58.3% and 59.4%, respectively; 95% CI, -9.48 to 7.29) or microbial eradication (93.3% and 91.1%; 95% CI, -2.44 to 6.74). Besifloxacin was generally well tolerated in these clinical trials, with the most common (> or =1.5%) ocular adverse events being nonspecific conjunctivitis (2.6%), blurred vision (2.1%), bacterial conjunctivitis (1.8%), and eye pain (1.5%). The recommended dose of besifloxacin is 1 drop in the affected eye(s) 3 times daily (4-12 hours apart) for 7 days. CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% appeared to be well tolerated in the populations studied and was efficacious in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis caused by susceptible isolates.

Efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in children and adolescents with bacterial conjunctivitis: a post hoc, subgroup analysis of three randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Acute conjunctivitis is the most frequent eye disorder seen by primary care physicians and one that often affects children. Besifloxacin is a new topical fluoroquinolone, the first chlorofluoroquinolone, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% in patients aged 1-17 years with bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of pediatric patients aged 1-17 years who had participated in three previously reported, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter, clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of besifloxacin in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The studies were conducted in a community setting (clinical centers). All three clinical trials included children (aged > or = 1 year) with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial conjunctivitis in at least one eye, based on the presence at baseline of grade 1 or greater purulent conjunctival discharge and conjunctival injection, and pin-hole visual acuity of at least 20/200 in both eyes for verbal patients. Two trials were vehicle controlled; the third trial was comparator controlled (moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.5% as base). In all studies, besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was administered as one drop in the affected eye(s) three times daily, at approximately 6-hourly intervals, for 5 days. The main outcome measures were clinical resolution and microbial eradication at visit 2 (day 4 +/- 1 in one study; day 5 +/- 1 in the other two studies) and visit 3 (day 8 or 9). Data from the two vehicle-controlled studies were combined for the assessments to provide greater statistical power. RESULTS: This analysis included 815 pediatric patients aged 1-17 years (447 with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis). Clinical resolution was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the besifloxacin group than in the vehicle group at both visit 2 (53.7% vs 41.3%) and visit 3 (88.1% vs 73.0%). Similarly, microbial eradication was significantly higher with besifloxacin than with vehicle at visit 2 (85.8% vs 56.3%) and visit 3 (82.8% vs 68.3%). No significant differences in clinical resolution and microbial eradication were noted between besifloxacin and moxifloxacin. Besifloxacin was well tolerated, with similar incidences of adverse events in the besifloxacin, vehicle, and moxifloxacin groups. CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in children and adolescents aged 1-17 years.

Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension for bacterial conjunctivitis.

Besifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension 0.6% (Besivance) is a recently approved fluoroquinolone for the topical treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The drug is rapidly bactericidal against common bacterial pathogens causing conjunctivitis, i.e., coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae as well as against other less common organisms. In addition to being a potent agent against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens including those resistant to other fluoroquinolones, besifloxacin has balanced DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV activity, which should slow the development of resistance. Topical administration achieves high sustained concentrations in human tears and good ocular tissue penetration in animals while demonstrating an excellent safety profile. Besifloxacin's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics meet the criteria for successful eradication of many Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria while demonstrating minimal systemic exposure. The biochemical properties, achievement of target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic goals and the restriction of besifloxacin to topical ophthalmic use should result in slower development of bacterial resistance, making besifloxacin a new, appealing option for empiric therapy in acute bacterial conjunctivitis.

Besifloxacin, a new ophthalmic fluoroquinolone for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

Besifloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone anti-infective developed for ophthalmic use. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% (Besivance) was recently approved for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical studies with besifloxacin. Microbiological studies have demonstrated that besifloxacin has wide-spectrum and potent activity against common ocular pathogens, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens associated with bacterial conjunctivitis, and retained activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci and multidrug-resistant strains. In preclinical and human studies, topically applied besifloxacin had a prolonged ocular concentration and minimal systemic exposure. In clinical studies, patients randomized to besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% experienced significantly higher rates of clinical resolution and microbial eradication than patients randomized to vehicle. Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% was also found to be as effective and well tolerated as moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%. The low minimum inhibitory concentrations and high attainment of pharmacodynamic targets with besifloxacin may contribute to a lower risk for the emergence of bacterial resistance, although further studies are needed. These data indicate that besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% is an important new option for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

Efficacy and safety of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% compared with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for treating bacterial conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and antimicrobial efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% with that of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active-controlled, noninferiority study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 1 year of age or older with clinical manifestations of bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to either besifloxacin suspension or moxifloxacin solution, instilled in the infected eye(s) 3 times daily for 5 days, and participated in study visits on days 1, 5 (+/-1 day), and 8 (+1 day). Assessments included clinical evaluation of signs and symptoms, visual acuity, biomicroscopy, and culture of the infected eye(s) at each visit, as well as direct ophthalmoscopy on days 1 and 8. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end points were clinical resolution and microbial eradication of baseline bacterial infection on day 5 in patients with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis. Secondary end points included clinical resolution and microbial eradication on day 8, individual clinical outcomes, microbial and clinical outcomes by bacterial species, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 1161 patients (533 with culture-confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis) were randomized. Based on the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference, besifloxacin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for clinical resolution on day 5 (58.3% vs. 59.4%, respectively; 95% CI, -9.48 to 7.29) and day 8 (84.5% vs. 84.0%, respectively, 95% CI, -5.6% to 6.75%) and for microbial eradication on day 5 (93.3% vs. 91.1%, respectively, 95% CI, -2.44 to 6.74) and day 8 (87.3% vs. 84.7%; 95% CI, -3.32 to 8.53). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment groups for either efficacy end points on days 5 or 8 (P>0.05). Besifloxacin and moxifloxacin were well tolerated. The cumulative frequency of ocular adverse events was similar between treatments (12% and 14% with besifloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively). However, eye irritation occurred more often in moxifloxacin-treated eyes (0.3% for besifloxacin vs. 1.4% for moxifloxacin; P = 0.0201). CONCLUSIONS: Besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension was non inferior to moxifloxacin ophthalmic suspension and provided similar safety and efficacy (clinical and microbiological) outcomes when used for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of the efficacy and safety of skin permeation enhancers using flurbiprofen as a model drug.

The efficacy and safety of commonly used enhancers were systemically evaluated by in vitro and in vivo methods in this study. Flurbiprofen was used as the model drug to examine the enhancing capacity of these enhancers. Both in vitro permeation by Franz cells and in vivo kinetics of skin disposition were performed to determine the flurbiprofen permeation by enhancers. Unsaturated fatty acids showed the greatest enhancement of flurbiprofen permeation. The enhancing effect of D-limonene was slightly lower than that of the fatty acids. Azone and L-alpha-lecithin even reduced the skin deposition by flurbiprofen application. In vitro prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) release by cell culture, in vivo transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and colorimetry, and skin morphological changes were determined to examine the irritation of the skin by enhancers. The results showed that skin disruption and inflammation did not necessary correspond to the enhancing efficiency of the enhancers. Moreover, some discrepancies were observed in these irritant profiles when using various methods. The fatty acids generally showed the most irritating properties, followed by Azone, D-limonene, and L-alpha-lecithin. A complete portrait of the efficacy and safety of commonly used enhancers was therefore established in this study.

Three-generation reproduction study with caprolactam in rats.

In a three-generation reproduction study, rats were given caprolactam in the diet of 0, 1000, 5000 and 10,000 ppm. No treatment-related effects were observed in the parental animals with respect to mortality, clinical signs, reproductive performance or gross pathology findings. Consistently lower body weights were noted in the P2 and P3 mid- and high-dose males and females. Consistently lower mean food consumption values were noted in the P2 and P3 mid- and high-dose males and the high-dose females. These differences were generally significant (P less than or equal to 0.05) in the high-dose group of both sexes. Compound-related histopathologic findings noted in the high-dose P1 males consisted of a slight increase in the severity of spontaneous nephropathies, occasionally accompanied by granular casts. The offspring data revealed no treatment-related effect with respect to gross appearance, gross pathology, survival, number of pups, percentage of male pups or kidney weight. Analysis of the offspring body weights on Days 1, 7 and 21 of lactation revealed consistently and generally significant lower mean values in the high-dose male and female animals of all filial generations. The mean body weights of both sexes in the mid-dose group were generally lower than those of the controls. The effects on mean body weight, mean food consumption and the group increases in the severity of nephropathy, accompanied by the presence of granular casts in some animals, are considered to be related to the administration of caprolactam.