New technology assessment and current and upcoming therapies for underactive bladder.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stakeholders from around the world came together to address the unmet needs of underactive bladder (UAB) at the 3rd International Congress for Underactive Bladder. METHODS: The main recommendation from the regulatory working group is a need for a meeting of UAB stakeholders and regulatory agencies including the FDA to discuss guidance for regulatory trial design for devices, drugs, and/or biologics for UAB. RESULTS: The following issues to be discussed and agreed upon for UAB trials: 1) Appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria. 2) Should residual urine volume be the primary outcome parameter and how often should it be measured? 3) Are there secondary measures that should have a place in UAB trials, such as change in the number of catheterizations, quality of life measures, etc.? 4) Use and format of bladder voiding and catheterization diary for trials. 5) Define role and technique of urodynamics in UAB trials. Are urodynamics required to monitor, and possibly exclude, individuals with high pressure voiding induced by bladder prokinetic therapies? 6) Development and use of UAB questionnaires. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The UAB regulatory working group recognizes the path forward should include engaging the FDA and other regulatory organizations that may harmonize and formalize guidance for regulatory trial designs for therapeutics for UAB.

Salivary hypofunction: An update on therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a literature review addressing the therapeutic strategies for salivary hypofunction. BACKGROUND: Qualitative and quantitative salivary dysfunctions predispose to changes in the oral mucosa and teeth, cause impairment to oral functions and negative impact on quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted using the terms "Xerostomia" AND, "Saliva Artificial" OR, "Citric Acid," "Malic Acid," "Chewing Gum," "Acupuncture" OR, "Pilocarpine" OR, "Bethanechol" OR, "Cevimeline" OR, "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy" OR, "Stem Cell Therapy" OR "Genetic Therapy" and their Mesh Terms. RESULTS: We selected 25 clinical trials investigating the effects of salivary substitutes, chewing gum, malic and citric acids, pilocarpine, cevimeline, bethanechol, acupuncture, hyperbaric oxygen therapy and regenerative therapies on salivary hypofunction. In most studies, the number of participants was low and the follow-up times short. The therapeutic modalities were classified according to the level of evidence on salivary dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Pilocarpine and cevimeline had the strongest evidence of beneficial effect on salivary hypofunction. Citric and malic acids increase salivary flow but also increase the risk of erosion and dental caries. There are no controlled clinical trials supporting the efficacy of acupuncture, stem cell therapy and gene therapy on salivary dysfunction, although clinical observations suggest a promising effect. There is no evidence supporting salivary substitutes, chewing gum, bethanechol or hyperbaric oxygen on the treatment of salivary hypofunction.

Malakoplakia in a healthy young female patient

Malakoplakia is a rare granulomatous disease that occurs commonly in the urinary tract and secondarily in the gastrointestinal tract. Most reported cases of malakoplakia are associated with immunosuppressive diseases or chronic prolonged illness. Here, we report a rare case of malakoplakia in a young healthy adolescent without any underlying disease. A 19-year-old female was referred to our hospital following the discovery of multiple rectal polyps with sigmoidoscopy. She had no specific past medical history but complained of recurrent abdominal pain and diarrhea for 3 months. A colonoscopy revealed diverse mucosal lesions including plaques, polyps, nodules, and mass-like lesions. Histological examination revealed a sheet of histiocytes with pathognomonic Michaelis-Gutmann bodies. We treated the patient with ciprofloxacin, the cholinergic agonist bethanechol, and a multivitamin for 6 months. A follow-up colonoscopy revealed that her condition was resolved with this course of treatment.

Electromotive administration of intravesical bethanechol and the clinical impact on acontractile detrusor management: introduction of a new test.

PURPOSE: It is often difficult to determine the functional status of the detrusor muscle in patients with detrusor areflexia. We performed a clinical study to establish a test defining residual detrusor capacity in such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In phase 1, 5 controls with detrusor areflexia were tested with an intravesical instillation of 20 mg. bethanechol in 150 cc of sodium chloride 0.3% with and without 20 mA. of pulsed current applied via an electrode catheter through the saline. Cystometry simultaneously recorded intravesical pressure changes. In phase 2, 45 patients with detrusor areflexia were tested with electromotive administration of intravesical bethanechol. In phase 3, 25 mg. bethanechol given orally once daily were prescribed for 15 patients and voiding control was assessed after 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Neither bethanechol without current nor current through saline only led to increased intravesical pressure. However, we noted a mean pressure increase of 34 cm. water during the electromotive administration of bethanechol in 24 of 26 patients with areflexia and neurological disease compared to only 3 cm. water in 3 of 11 with a history of chronic bladder dilatation. Oral bethanechol restored spontaneous voiding in 9 of 11 patients who had had a positive response to the electromotive administration of bethanechol, whereas all 4 without a pressure increase during the electromotive administration of bethanechol did not void spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Electromotive administration of intravesical bethanechol identifies patients with an atonic bladder and adequate residual detrusor muscle function who are candidates for restorative measures, such as oral bethanechol and intravesical electrostimulation. Those who do not respond to the electromotive administration of bethanechol do not benefit from oral bethanechol and are candidates for catheterization.