Evaluation of high dose N- Acetylcysteine on airway inflammation and quality of life outcomes in adults with bronchiectasis: A randomised placebo-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: High dose N acetylcysteine (NAC), a mucolytic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent has been shown to significantly reduce exacerbations, and improve quality of life in placebo controlled, double blind randomised (RCT) studies in patients with COPD, and in an open, randomised study in bronchiectasis. In this pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we wished to investigate the feasibility of a larger clinical trial, and the anti-inflammatory and clinical benefits of high dose NAC in bronchiectasis. AIMS: Primary outcome: to assess the efficacy of NAC 2400 mg/day at 6 weeks on sputum neutrophil elastase (NE), a surrogate marker for exacerbations. Secondary aims included assessing the efficacy of NAC on sputum MUC5B, IL-8, lung function, quality of life, and adverse effects. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive 2400 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. They underwent 3 visits: at baseline, week 3 and week 6 where clinical and sputum measurements were assessed. RESULTS: The study was stopped early due to the COVID pandemic. In total 24/30 patients were recruited, of which 17 completed all aspects of the study. Given this, a per protocol analysis was undertaken: NAC (n = 9) vs placebo (n = 8): mean age 72 vs 62 years; male gender: 44% vs 50%; baseline median FEV11.56 L (mean 71.5 % predicted) vs 2.29L (mean 82.2% predicted). At 6 weeks, sputum NE fell by 47% in the NAC group relative to placebo (mean fold difference (95%CI: 0.53 (0.12,2.42); MUC5B increased by 48% with NAC compared with placebo. Lung function, FVC improved significantly with NAC compared with placebo at 6 weeks (mean fold difference (95%CI): 1.10 (1.00, 1.20), p = 0.045. Bronchiectasis Quality of life measures within the respiratory and social functioning domains demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements, with social functioning reaching statistical significance. Adverse effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: High dose NAC exhibits anti-inflammatory benefits, and improvements in aspects of quality of life and lung function measures. It is safe and well tolerated. Further larger placebo controlled RCT's are now warranted examining its role in reducing exacerbations.

[Chinese experts consensus statement: diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis (2023)].

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common autosomal recessive genetic diseases in Caucasians, but CF patients in China are rare, and it was listed as the first batch of rare diseases in China in 2018. In recent years, CF has been gradually recognized in China, and the number of CF patients reported in China in the past 10 years is more than 2.5 times the total number in the previous 30 years, and the total number of CF patients is estimated to be more than 20 000. The research progress of CF gene modification has led to the innovation of CF treatment. However, the sweat test as an important test for the diagnosis of CF has not been widely implemented in China. At present, the diagnosis and treatment of CF in China still lacks standardized recommendations. In view of these updates, the Chinese Experts Cystic Fibrosis Consensus Committee has formed "the Chinese experts consensus statement: diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis" based on extensive opinion gathering, literatures review, multiple meetings and discussions. This consensus collects 38 core issues related to CF, including pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and patient management. Finally, 32 recommendations were formulated. The consensus used the modified GRADE methodology to grade the evidence evaluation and recommendations. This is the current state of CF consensus in China, and we hope to improve the diagnosis and treatment of CF in China in the future.Summary of recommendationsQuestion 1: How can CF be identified?CF should be suspected if there is: (1) a family history of CF; (2) delayed meconium expulsion or meconium ileus; (3) pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, mainly characterized by long-standing steatorrhea and malnutrition; (4) recurrent lower respiratory tract infections of infantile onset, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), Staphylococcus aureus infections of respiratory aetiology; (5) chronic sinusitis, especially when combined with juvenile presentation of nasal polyps; (6) chest CT abnormalities such as the presence of air trapping, bronchiectasis (upper lobe predominant); (7) pseudo-Bartter syndrome; (8) absence of vas deferens in males; (9) clubbing in young bronchiectasis patients(1C).Question 2: What are the diagnostic criteria for CF?1.1 Presence of one or more of the characteristic clinical manifestations or family history consistent with CF, and meeting at least one of the following definite diagnostic criteria in 1.2 or 1.3.1.2 Sweat chloride testing:(1) Concentrations of more than 60 mmol/L are diagnostic; (2) concentrations between 30-59 mmol/L are intermediate, and genetic variation must be considered to confirm the diagnosis; (3) concentrations less than 30 mmol/L are considered normal.1.3 Genetic testing:(1) Detection of two disease-causing CFTR(cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) mutations on biallelic alleles; (2) The CFTR variants are of undetermined significance, but tests such as sweat chloride concentration, intestinal current measurement, or nasal mucosal potential difference suggest abnormal CFTR function, then CF is diagnostic(1C).Question 3: What is the diagnostic process for CF arranged?Sweat chloride testing and CFTR gene analysis are recommended in all patients suspected of CF(1D).Question 4: What is the value of sweat chloride testing in the diagnosis of CF?Sweat chloride testing is the gold standard for the clinical diagnosis of CF(1C).Question 5: What is the value of CFTR genetic testing in Chinese CF diagnosis?Biallelic pathogenic variants of CFTR are a definitive diagnosis of CF(1D).Question 6: What is the diagnostic value of imaging for CF?Chest CT is a sensitive test for early stages of lung disease in patients with CF and is appropriate in younger patients and to assess disease progression. The imaging findings of abdominal visceral involvement in CF lack specificity(2C).Question 7: How to evaluate the pancreatic function of CF patients?Fecal elastase may be used as the first indicator to assess pancreatic exocrine function in patients with CF (2C).Question 8: How to diagnose hepatic abnormality of CF?CF related liver disease was diagnosed when CF was confirmed and 2 of the following 4 criteria were met: (1) hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly confirmed by ultrasound; (2) ALT, AST, and GGT on three consecutive occasions above the upper limit of normal on three consecutive occasions for more than 12 months and excluding other causes; (3) had evidence of liver involvement, portal hypertension, or bile duct dilatation by ultrasound; (4) liver biopsy confirmation (focal biliary cirrhosis or multilobular cirrhosis) may be indicated if the diagnosis is suspected(2D).Question 9: How to identify pulmonary exacerbations in patients with CF?Pulmonary exacerbations are indicated when any 4 of the following 12 signs or symptoms are met: increased sputum; new onset haemoptysis or increased haemoptysis; exacerbation of cough; increased dyspnea; malaise, fatigue, or somnolence; body temperature above 38 ℃; anorexia or weight loss; sinus pain or tenderness; increased sinus secretions; new chest signs; FEV1≥10% decline from previous; imaging changes suggestive of pulmonary infection(2D).Question 10: How to diagnose CF related diabetes?Diagnostic criteria for CF related diabetes are the same as those for diabetes in the population(1D).Question 11: How to evaluate the nutritional status of CF patients?Anthropometric parameters reflecting nutritional status should be assessed regularly. And the goal of nutritional assessment is to evaluate and monitor whether pediatric patients are achieving normal standards of growth and development or whether adult patients are maintaining adequate nutritional status(1C).Question 12: Does CF require pathological examination as a diagnostic basis?Pathohistological biopsy is not recommended as a first-line diagnostic method in patients with a suspected diagnosis of CF(1D).Question 13: Do CF patients need long-term macrolides?At least 6 months of azithromycin treatment is recommended for CF patients with chronic PA infection(2A).Question 14: Do CF patients need long-term inhalation of hypertonic saline?Long term treatment with hypertonic saline is recommended for patients with CF(1A).Question 15: Do CF patients need long-term inhalation of Dornase alfa(DNase)?Long term use of DNase is recommended in patients with CF aged 6 years and older(1A).Question 16: Do CF patients need inhalation of mannitol?Inhaled mannitol therapy is recommended for more than 6 months in patients with CF aged 18 years and older when other inhaled treatments are unavailable or intolerable(2A).Question 17: How to deal with PA found in the sputum culture of CF patients?When sputum cultures from patients with CF are positive for PA, it needs to determine the characteristics of the infection first. The purpose for acute infection is to eradicate PA. Chronic colonization does not need to be eradicated, and the main purpose is to reduce the bacterial load and improve symptoms(1A).Question 18: Do CF patients need inhalation of antibiotics?Inhaled antibiotic therapy is recommended for CF patients with PA infection(1A).Question 19: Do CF patients need inhaled or systemic corticosteroids?In patients with CF without asthma or ABPA, routine inhaled or systemic glucocorticoids are not recommended (2A).Question 20: Do CF patients need to inhale bronchodilators?Bronchodilators can be used in the short term to improve symptoms in patients with CF in the presence of airway obstruction, but the long-term benefit is insufficient (2B).Question 21: Do CF patients need expectorant medicine?Patients with CF can take acetylcysteine orally or aerosolized(2A).Question 22: How to deal with acute pulmonary exacerbation in CF patients?Intensive implementation of non-antimicrobial therapy is recommended during pulmonary exacerbations in patients with CF. Antimicrobials with activity against PA were selected for empirical treatment, and the treatment was adjusted according to the results of bacterial culture and drug susceptibility testing. A 21-day long course of anti-infective therapy is not recommended(1B).Question 23: How to treat CF patients with ABPA?Medical therapy is recommended for CF patients with ABPA who meet any of the following criteria: patients with elevated immunoglobulin E levels and concomitant worsening of pulmonary function and/or pulmonary symptoms, or imaging suggesting new infiltrative foci in the chest(1D).Glucocorticoids are recommended for ABPA exacerbations in CF patients without contraindications(2D).Itraconazole should be added if the patient presents with poor response to corticosteroids, recurrence of ABPA, corticosteroid dependence, or corticosteroid toxicity(2D).Question 24: Is lung transplantation recommended for patients with CF? When is it recommended?Patients with CF may be evaluated for lung transplantation when they meet the following criteria after optimal medical therapy: (1) FEV1<30% predicted; (2) FEV1<40% predicted (<50% predicted in children) with the following: 6-minute walk distance<400 meters; PaCO2>50 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa); hypoxia at rest or after activity; pulmonary artery pressure measured by cardiotocography>50 mmHg or right heart dysfunction; continued deterioration despite aggressive supplementation of nutritional support; two exacerbations requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy per year; massive hemoptysis (>240 ml) requiring pulmonary artery embolization; presented with pneumothorax; (3) FEV1<50% predicted and rapid decline in lung function or rapid worsening of symptoms; (4) Presented with an acute exacerbation requiring positive pressure mechanical ventilation(2C).Question 25: How to deal with pancreatic disease in CF patients?Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is recommended in patients with CF pancreatic disease(1A).Question 26:How to deal with hepatobiliary disease in CF patients?Ursodeoxycholic acid is not recommended in asymptomatic patients with CF hepatobiliary disease(2B).Question 27: How to deal with gastrointestinal problems such as acid regurgitation in CF patients?Acid suppression is recommended for CF patients with gastrointestinal symptoms such as acid regurgitation (2B).Question 28: How to deal with CF related diabetes?Insulin therapy is recommended in CF related diabetes(1B).Question 29: How should nutritional support be given to patients with CF?Energy intake in patients with CF is recommended to be 110%-200% of the energy requirement of a healthy person under equivalent physiological conditions. And maintaining adequate protein, appropriate intake of fats, electrolytes, and fat-soluble vitamins are recommanded(1A).Question 30: How should respiratory rehabilitation be performed in patients with CF?Airway clearance therapy and appropriate exercise are recommended for patients with CF(1A).Question 31: What is included in the follow-up of CF patient?Patients with CF should have regular follow-up. Adult patients are recommended to be followed every 3-6 months, and children should be followed more frequently(2A).Question 32: How should CF patients avoid infections?Inpatients and outpatients are recommended to be separated according to microbiota carriage status(1D).Good hand hygiene is recommended for the patients with CF and their contacts(1D).It is recommended that CF patients wear masks in healthcare settings. This may reduce the release of potentially infectious aerosols during coughing (1D).Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with CF>6 months of age and for all family members of patients with CF and all healthcare workers caring for these patients(2D).Palivizumab may be considered for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients with CF under two years of age(2A).

Targeted AntiBiotics for Chronic pulmonary diseases (TARGET ABC): can targeted antibiotic therapy improve the prognosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients with chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, and asthma? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is seen in chronic pulmonary disease and is associated with exacerbations and poor long-term prognosis. However, evidence-based guidelines for the management and treatment of P. aeruginosa infection in chronic, non-cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary disease are lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate whether targeted antibiotic treatment against P. aeruginosa can reduce exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), non-CF bronchiectasis, and asthma. METHODS: This study is an ongoing multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. A total of 150 patients with COPD, non-CF bronchiectasis or asthma, and P. aeruginosa-positive lower respiratory tract samples will be randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to either no antibiotic treatment or anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment with intravenous beta-lactam and oral ciprofloxacin for 14 days. The primary outcome, analyzed with two co-primary endpoints, is (i) time to prednisolone and/or antibiotic requiring exacerbation or death, in the primary or secondary health sector, within days 20-365 from study allocation and (ii) days alive and without exacerbation within days 20-365 from the study allocation. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine whether targeted antibiotics can benefit future patients with chronic, non-CF pulmonary disease and P. aeruginosa infection in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality, thus optimizing therapeutic approaches in this large group of chronic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262142 . Registered on August 25, 2017.

Risk of Severe Bleeding With Extended Rivaroxaban to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Medically Ill Patients With Bronchiectasis.

Background: Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammation of the bronchi with recurrent infections and hemoptysis. The MAGELLAN study compared oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily (QD), for 35 ± 4 days with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg QD for 10 ± 4 days followed by placebo for 25 ± 4 days to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness. MAGELLAN included a subset of patients with bronchiectasis. In a post hoc analysis, we evaluated the incidence and severity of pulmonary bleeding in patients with bronchiectasis who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness. This analysis included MAGELLAN patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis at baseline. Patients were evaluated by treatment group for International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding, non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding, and the composite of the 2 (ie, clinically relevant bleeding). Results: Medically ill patients with bronchiectasis were randomized to rivaroxaban (n = 60) or enoxaparin/placebo (n = 61). There were 2 fatal pulmonary bleeds and 1 fatal gastrointestinal bleed in the rivaroxaban arm and no fatal or major bleeding in the enoxaparin/placebo arm. The incidence of major bleeding was 5% in the rivaroxaban arm. One NMCR bleed occurred in the rivaroxaban arm and 2 NMCR bleeds occurred in the enoxaparin/placebo arm. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 6.7% versus 3.3% in the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/placebo groups, respectively (relative risk = 2.06 [95% confidence interval: 0.351-12.046]). Conclusion: In-patients hospitalized with bronchiectasis and an acute medical illness, clinically relevant bleeding, including fatal pulmonary hemorrhage, occurs more frequently with extended rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis than with enoxaparin followed by placebo.

The rough inhalable ciprofloxacin hydrochloride microparticles based on silk fibroin for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis therapy with good biocompatibility.

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a chronic respiratory disease, and the thick and viscous mucus covering on respiratory epithelia can entrap the inhaled drugs, resulting in compromised therapeutic efficiency. In order to solve this problem, the inhalable ciprofloxacin hydrochloride microparticles (CMs) based on silk fibroin (SF) and mannitol (MAN) were designed and developed. SF was applied to increase the loading efficiency of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride by strong electrostatic interactions. MAN could facilitate the penetration of drugs through mucus, which ensured the drugs could reach their targets before clearance. Furthermore, the aerodynamic performance of the inhalable microparticles could be tuned by changing the surface roughness to achieve a high fine particle fraction value (45.04%). The antibacterial effects of CMs were also confirmed by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration against four different bacteria strains. Moreover, a series of experiments both in vitro and in vivo showed that CMs would not affect the lung function and induce the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in lungs, demonstrating their excellent biocompatibility and biosafety. Therefore, CMs might be a promising pulmonary drug delivery system for the treatment of NCFB.

Effects of a Mixture of Ivy Leaf Extract and Coptidis rhizome on Patients with Chronic Bronchitis and Bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Hederacoside C from ivy leaf dry extracts (HH) and berberine from Coptidis rhizome dry extracts (CR) can be combined (HHCR) as a herbal product. Previous studies have demonstrated that HHCR has antitussive and expectorant effects in animal models of respiratory disease. However, the therapeutic effects of HHCR on respiratory diseases in humans have not been well-studied. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the effectiveness of HHCR in patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. METHODS: This was a multicenter (10 university teaching hospitals), open-label, prospective, single-arm, observational study. Consecutive patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis were included. Patients were orally treated with HHCR daily for 12 weeks. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores and bronchitis severity scores (BSS) were measured at baseline and at the end of the 12-week study. RESULTS: In total, 376 patients were enrolled, of which 304 were finally included in the study, including 236 males and 68 females with a median age of 69 years (range: 37-88 years). After 12 weeks of HHCR treatment, there was a significant improvement in SGRQ score (baseline, 32.52 ± 16.93 vs. end of study, 29.08 ± 15.16; p < 0.0001) and a significant reduction in BSS (baseline, 7.16 ± 2.63 vs. end of study, 4.72 ± 2.45; p < 0.0001). During the study, 14 patients concomitantly used an inhaled corticosteroid and 83 patients used an inhaled bronchodilator. HHCR also had significant positive effects on these patients in terms of SGRQ score and BSS. No serious adverse drug reactions occurred during HHCR treatment. CONCLUSIONS: treatment with HHCR improved the SGRQ score and BSS in patients with chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. HHCR may be a new therapeutic option for chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis. Large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are warranted.

Development of Inhalable Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Ciprofloxacin for Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis Treatment.

PURPOSE: Ciprofloxacin (CIP) has poor lung targeting after oral inhalation. This study developed optimized inhalable nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for CIP to enhance deposition and accumulation in deeper parts of the lungs for treatment of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). METHODS: NLC formulations based on stearic acid and oleic acid were successfully prepared by hot homogenization and in vitro-characterized. CIP-NLCs were formulated into nanocomposite micro particles (NCMPs) for administration in dry powder inhalation (DPI) formulations by spray-drying (SD) using different ratios of chitosan (CH) as a carrier. DPI formulations were evaluated for drug content and in vitro deposition, and their mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), fine particle fraction (FPF), fine particle dose (FPD), and emitted dose (ED) were determined. RESULTS: The CIP-NLCs were in the nanometric size range (102.3 ± 4.6 nm), had a low polydispersity index (0.267 ± 0.12), and efficient CIP encapsulation (98.75% ± 0.048%), in addition to a spherical and smooth shape with superior antibacterial activity. The in vitro drug release profile of CIP from CIP-NLCs showed 80% release in 10 h. SD of CIP-NLCs with different ratios of CH generated NCMPs with good yield (>65%). The NCMPs had a corrugated surface, but with increasing lipid:CH ratios, more spherical, smooth, and homogenous NCMPs were obtained. In addition, there was a significant change in the FPF with increasing lipid:CH ratios (P ˂ 0.05). NCMP-1 (lipid:CH = 1:0.5) had the highest FPD (45.0 µg) and FPF (49.2%), while NCMP-3 (lipid:CH = 1:1.5) had the lowest FPF (37.4%). All NCMP powders had an MMAD in the optimum size range of 3.9-5.1 µm. CONCLUSION: Novel inhalable CIP NCMP powders are a potential new approach to improved target ability and delivery of CIP for NCFB treatment.

A Potential Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor for Bronchiectasis Therapy: Quercetin-Chitosan Nanoparticle Complex Exhibiting Superior Inhibition of Biofilm Formation and Swimming Motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the Native Quercetin.

Quercetin (QUE)-a plant-derived flavonoid, is recently established as an effective quorum sensing (QS) inhibiting agent in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-the main bacterial pathogen in bronchiectasis lungs. Successful clinical application of QUE, however, is hindered by its low solubility in physiological fluids. Herein we developed a solubility enhancement strategy of QUE in the form of a stable amorphous nanoparticle complex (nanoplex) of QUE and chitosan (CHI), which was prepared by electrostatically driven complexation between ionized QUE molecules and oppositely charged CHI. At its optimal preparation condition, the QUE-CHI nanoplex exhibited a size of roughly 150 nm with a 25% QUE payload and 60% complexation efficiency. The complexation with CHI had no adverse effect on the antibacterial and anticancer activities of QUE, signifying the preservation of QUE's bioactivities in the nanoplex. Compared to the native QUE, the QUE-CHI nanoplex exhibited superior QS inhibition in suppressing the QS-regulated swimming motility and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa, but not in suppressing the virulence factor production. The superior inhibitions of the biofilm formation and swimming motility afforded by the nanoplex were attributed to (1) its higher kinetic solubility (5-times higher) that led to higher QUE exposures, and (2) the synergistic QS inhibition attributed to its CHI fraction.

Managing Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease With a Little Help From My Friend.

Management of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease is complicated, frequently unsuccessful, and frustrating to patients and clinicians. The initial treatment effort may not be directed solely at MAC infection, rather it is often initiating airway clearance measures for bronchiectasis. The next important steps are deciding who to treat and when to initiate therapy. Definitive or unambiguous guidance for these decisions is often elusive. The evidence supporting the current macrolide-based regimen for treating MAC lung disease is compelling. This regimen has been recommended in consensus nontuberculous mycobacterial treatment guidelines from 1997, 2007, and 2020, although clinician compliance with these recommendations is inconsistent. Understanding the idiosyncrasies of MAC antibiotic resistance is crucial for optimal antibiotic management. As a corollary, the importance of avoiding development of macrolide resistance due to inadequate therapy cannot be overstated. An inhaled liposome amikacin preparation is now approved for treating refractory MAC lung disease and holds promise for an even broader role in MAC therapy. Surgery is also an important therapeutic adjunct for selected patients. Microbiologic recurrences due either to new infection or treatment relapse/failure are common and require the same level of rigorous assessment and clinical judgment for determining their significance as initial MAC isolates. In summary, treatment of patients with MAC lung disease is rarely straight forward and requires familiarity with multiple factors directly and indirectly related to MAC lung disease. The many nuances of MAC lung disease therapy defy simple treatment algorithms; however, with patience, attention to detail, and perseverance, the outcome for most patients is favorable.

Changes in respiratory symptoms during 48-week treatment with ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) in bronchiectasis: results from the ORBIT-3 and -4 studies.

It is not known if inhaled antibiotics improve respiratory symptoms in patients with bronchiectasis. In the recent phase-3 ORBIT trials, 48 weeks' treatment with ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) did not significantly improve symptoms using the prespecified method of analysis comparing baseline symptoms to those after 48 weeks, when patients had been off treatment for 28 days. This method of analysis does not take account of possible improvements in symptoms while on active treatment.A post hoc analysis of two identical randomised trials of ARD-3150 (ORBIT-3 and -4) administered 28 days on and 28 days off in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. The quality-of-life bronchiectasis respiratory symptom scale (QOL-B-RSS), which has a one-week recall period, was administered every 28 days. We examined whether respiratory symptoms improved during on-treatment periods and the relationship of changes in QOL-B-RSS to changes in bacterial load using a mixed-model repeated measures approach.ARD-3150 treatment resulted in a significant improvement in respiratory symptoms during the on-treatment periods with concordant results between ORBIT-3 (estimate 1.4 points, se 0.49; p=0.004) and ORBIT-4 (estimate 1.1 point, se 0.41; p=0.006). The proportion of patients achieving a symptom improvement above the minimum clinically important difference was higher with ARD-3150 compared with placebo during on-treatment cycles (p=0.024). Changes in respiratory symptoms were correlated with changes in bacterial load in the treatment group (r=-0.89, p<0.0001). Individual estimates for decrements in the QOL-B RSS during exacerbation were -9.4 points (se 0.91) in ORBIT-3 and -10.8 points (0.74) in ORBIT-4 (both p<0.0001).Inhaled ARD-3150 resulted in significant improvements in respiratory symptoms during the on-treatment periods which were lost during off-treatment periods. These results supports the concept that reducing bacterial load can improve respiratory symptoms in patients with bronchiectasis.

Ternary nanoparticle complex of antibiotic, polyelectrolyte, and mucolytic enzyme as a potential antibiotic delivery system in bronchiectasis therapy.

Antibiotic-polyelectrolyte nanoparticle complex (or nanoplex in short) has been recently demonstrated as a superior antibiotic delivery system to the native antibiotic in bronchiectasis therapy owed to its ability to overcome the lung's mucus barrier and generate high localized antibiotic exposure in the infected sites. The present work aimed to further improve the mucus permeability, hence the antibacterial efficacy of the nanoplex, by incorporating mucolytic enzyme papain (PAP) at the nanoplex formation step to produce PAP-decorated antibiotic-polyelectrolyte nanoplex exhibiting built-in mucolytic capability. Ciprofloxacin (CIP) and dextran sulfate (DXT) were used as the models for antibiotics and polyelectrolyte, respectively. The results showed that the PAP inclusion had minimal effects on the physical characteristics, preparation efficiency, and dissolution of the CIP-DXT nanoplex. The optimal CIP-(DXT-PAP) nanoplex exhibited size and zeta potential of approximately 200 nm and -50 mV with CIP and PAP payloads of 60% and 32% (w/w), respectively. The nanoplex was prepared at high efficiency with larger than 80% CIP and PAP utilization rates. The CIP-(DXT-PAP) nanoplex exhibited tenfold improvement in the mucus permeability compared to its CIP-DXT nanoplex counterpart, resulting in the former's superior bactericidal activity against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in the presence of mucus barrier. A trade-off, nevertheless, existed between antibacterial efficacy and cytotoxicity towards human lung epithelium cells upon the incorporation of PAP above a certain concentration threshold. Therefore, the optimal dosing of the CIP-(DXT-PAP) nanoplex must be carefully determined.

Efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents for the treatment of bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis is controversial. The objective of the study was to review systematically the efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in patients with bronchiectasis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating inhaled ciprofloxacin agents among patients with bronchiectasis. Data were pooled using a meta-analysis technique. RESULTS: Two phase II and four phase III RCTs were included with a total of 1685 patients. Treatment durations of phase III studies were 48 weeks, while those of phase II studies were shorter. Pooled analysis of overall studies exhibited a statistically significant benefit of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in three exacerbation outcome measures, including time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.86, I2 23%), exacerbation frequency (risk ratio [RR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, I2 42%), and exacerbation proportion (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96, I2 25%) without significant heterogeneity. Outcomes evaluating pulmonary function, quality of life, and adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups. Although eradication of respiratory pathogens was more frequently observed, the emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance was also significantly higher in the ciprofloxacin group. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of RCTs of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents showed clinical benefit in terms of pulmonary exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis. Since a significant increase of resistance was also noticed, clinical trials with a longer study period are required for a conclusive assessment. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and impact of macrolide antibiotics on Moraxella catarrhalis in the upper and lower airways of children with chronic endobronchial suppuration.

INTRODUCTION: Moraxella catarrhalis is an important but insufficiently studied respiratory pathogen. AIM: To determine antibiotic susceptibility and impact of recent antibiotics on M. catarrhalis from children with chronic endobronchial suppuration. METHODOLOGY: We cultured nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids collected from children who were prospectively enrolled in studies of chronic cough and had flexible bronchoscopy performed. Recent ß-lactam or macrolide antibiotic use was recorded. M. catarrhalis isolates stored at -80 °C were re-cultured and susceptibility determined to a range of antibiotics including the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin. RESULTS: Data from concurrently collected NP and BAL specimens were available from 547 children (median age 2.4 years) enrolled from 2007 to 2016. M. catarrhalis NP carriage was detected in 149 (27  %) children and lower airway infection (≥104 c.f.u. ml-1 BAL) in 67 (12  %) children. In total, 91  % of 222 M. catarrhalis isolates were ß-lactamase producers, and non-susceptibility was high to benzylpenicillin (98 %), cefaclor (39 %) and cotrimoxazole (38 %). Overall, >97  % isolates were susceptible to cefuroxime, chloramphenicol, erythromycin and tetracycline; three isolates were erythromycin-resistant (MIC >0.5 mg l-1). Recent macrolide antibiotics (n=152 children, 28 %) were associated with significantly reduced M. catarrhalis carriage and lower airway infection episodes compared to children who did not receive macrolides; odds ratios 0.19 (95  % CI 0.10-0.35) and 0.15 (0.04-0.41), respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequent use of macrolides, few macrolide-resistant isolates were detected. This suggests a fitness cost associated with macrolide resistance in M. catarrhalis. Macrolide antibiotics remain an effective choice for treating M. catarrhalis lower airway infection in children with chronic endobronchial suppuration.

Microbiological changes observed over 48 weeks of treatment with inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin in individuals with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

OBJECTIVES: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been associated with increased pulmonary exacerbation (PEx) and mortality risk. European Respiratory Society guidelines conditionally recommend inhaled antimicrobials for persons with NCFBE, P aeruginosa and three or more PEx/year. We report microbiological results of two randomized, 48-week placebo-controlled trials of ARD-3150 (inhaled liposomal ciprofloxacin) in individuals with NCFBE with P aeruginosa and PEx history [Lancet Respir Med 2019;7:213-26]. METHODS: Respiratory secretions from 582 participants receiving up to six 28-day on/off treatment cycles were analysed for sputum P. aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli densities, P. aeruginosa susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin and nine other antimicrobials, and prevalence of other bacterial opportunists. Associations between PEx risk and sputum density, antimicrobial susceptibility and opportunist prevalence changes were studied. RESULTS: Sputum P. aeruginosa density reductions from baseline after ARD-3150 treatments ranged from 1.77 (95% CI 2.13-1.40) versus 0.54 (95% CI 0.89-0.19) log10 CFU/g for placebo (second period) to 2.07 (95% CI 2.45-1.69) versus 0.70 (95% CI 1.11-0.29) log10 CFU/g for placebo (fourth period) with only modest correlation between density reduction magnitude and PEx benefit. ARD-3150 (but not placebo) treatment was associated with increased P. aeruginosa ciprofloxacin MIC but not emergence of other bacterial opportunists across the study; ciprofloxacin MIC50 increased from 0.5 to 1 mg/L, MIC90 increased from 4 to 16 mg/L. Other antimicrobial MIC were mostly unaffected. CONCLUSION: Microbiological changes over 48 weeks of ARD-3150 treatment appear modest. Ciprofloxacin susceptibility (but not other antimicrobial susceptibility) decreases were observed that did not appear to preclude PEx risk reduction benefit.

Safety and efficacy of the human neutrophil elastase inhibitor BAY 85-8501 for the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited treatment options for patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (non-CF BE). Human neutrophil elastase (HNE) is a mediator of tissue destruction in non-CF BE. BAY 85-8501, a selective and reversible HNE inhibitor, could represent a new treatment option for this disease. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of 1 mg BAY 85-8501 once daily (OD) for 28 days compared with placebo in patients with non-CF BE. Secondary objectives were to investigate the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with BAY 85-8501 on health-related quality of life, pulmonary function, and inflammatory and tissue damage biomarkers in sputum, blood and/or urine, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of BAY 85-8501. RESULTS: Overall, 94 patients (mean age, 66 years; 53% male) were randomized (n = 47 per group), and 82 completed the study (BAY 85-8501, n = 37; placebo, n = 45). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 31 patients (66%) taking BAY 85-8501 and in 36 patients (77%) taking placebo, and were mostly mild or moderate. The serious TEAEs (BAY 85-8501, n = 3; placebo, n = 1) were not considered to be study-drug related. There were no changes in pulmonary function parameters from baseline to end of treatment, and health-related quality of life did not improve in any group. HNE activity in blood after zymosan challenge decreased significantly with BAY 85-8501 treatment (P = 0.0250 versus placebo). There were no significant differences in other biomarkers between treatment groups, with the exception of a small increase in interleukin-8 levels in sputum in the BAY 85-8501 group. Trough plasma concentrations of BAY 85-8501 plateaued after 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: 1 mg BAY 85-8501 OD had a favourable safety and tolerability profile when administered for 28 days to patients with non-CF BE. Further studies with a longer treatment duration are needed to evaluate the potential clinical efficacy in this study population.

Novel Inhalable Ciprofloxacin Dry Powders for Bronchiectasis Therapy: Mannitol-Silk Fibroin Binary Microparticles with High-Payload and Improved Aerosolized Properties.

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a chronic respiratory disease associated with the high morbidity and mortality. Long-term intermittent therapy by inhalable antibiotics has recently emerged as an effective approach for NCFB treatment. However, the effective delivery of antibiotics to the lung requires administering a high dose to the site of infection. Herein, we investigated the novel inhalable silk-based microparticles as a promising approach to deliver high-payload ciprofloxacin (CIP) for NCFB therapy. Silk fibroin (SF) was applied to improve drug-payload and deposit efficiency of the dry powder particles. Mannitol was added as a mucokinetic agent. The dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations of CIP microparticles were evaluated in vitro in terms of the aerodynamic performance, particle size distribution, drug loading, morphology, and their solid state. The optimal formulation (highest drug loading, 80%) exhibited superior aerosolization performance in terms of fine particle fraction (45.04 ± 0.84%), emitted dose (98.10 ± 1.27%), mass median aerodynamic diameter (3.75 ± 0.03 µm), and geometric standard deviation (1.66 ± 0.10). The improved drug loading was due to the electrostatic interactions between the SF and CIP by adsorption, and the superior aerosolization efficiency would be largely attributed to the fluffy and porous cotton-like property and low-density structure of SF. The presented results indicated the novel inhalable silk-based DPI microparticles of CIP could provide a promising strategy for the treatment of NCFB.

Spotlight on inhaled ciprofloxacin and its potential in the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) is a severe chronic illness characterized by irreversible dilation of airways and thickening of bronchial walls, chronic inflammation, repeated infections, and progressive obstruction of the airways. In contrast to cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (CFB), which is a well-defined genetic disorder, NCFB is a heterogeneous disease caused by many different medical entities. Inhaled antibiotics are effective for patients with CFB, but their efficacy in NCFB has not been proven. The main pathogens involved in the colonization of patients with bronchiectasis are Haemophilus influenza, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The latter is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, in NCFB, P. aeruginosa strains are frequently more resistant than those in CFB. At present, there are no approved inhaled antibiotic therapies for NCFB patients. Inhaled ciprofloxacin has been under investigation in the last few years. In two phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, the use of inhaled ciprofloxacin was significantly associated with reduction in sputum bacterial density and greater eradication rates. In four phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, the results regarding the time of the first exacerbation and the rate of exacerbations were inconsistent. Specifically, ORBIT-4 and RESPIRE-1 trials showed clinical benefit (prolongation of the time of the first exacerbation and reduced rate of exacerbations in the treatment group compared to the placebo group), whereas the ORBIT-3 and RESPIRE-2 failed to achieve their primary endpoints. The RESPIRE-1 was the first trial that examined the 14-days on/off course separate from the standard 28-days on/off regimen, which is based on CFB protocol treatments. The current data on the efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin are encouraging, but further evaluation is needed to determine the appropriate target group and the ideal duration of treatment.

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC).

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is the most commonly isolated nontuberculous mycobacterial respiratory pathogen worldwide. MAC lung disease is manifested either by fibrocavitary radiographic changes similar to pulmonary tuberculosis or by bronchiectasis with nodular and reticulonodular radiographic changes. This latter form of MAC lung disease, termed "nodular bronchiectatic (NB) MAC lung disease" is the most common form of MAC lung disease in the United States. Treatment at the time of diagnosis is always indicated for fibrocavitary MAC lung disease because it is always progressive and associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with NB MAC lung disease. In contrast, the NB form of MAC lung disease is more indolent and frequently does not require antimycobacterial therapy. For patients with NB MAC lung disease, the priorities are typically to treat the underlying bronchiectasis and determine the course and impact of the MAC infection over time. Guidelines-based MAC therapy with multidrug regimens including macrolides is usually effective, but far from as predictably effective and durable as therapy for tuberculosis. It is imperative that clinicians are familiar with MAC drug resistance mechanisms and the pitfalls of inappropriate dependence on in vitro drug susceptibility testing which can predispose patients to the development of macrolide resistance with its attendant high mortality. It is now more than 20 years since the emergence of macrolides for MAC therapy with no new comparably effective agents introduced in that time, although one new inhaled amikacin therapy under study offers promise.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Only Versus With Nutritional Supplementation in Patients With Bronchiectasis: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended for bronchiectasis, but there is little evidence of its efficacy in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of PR in normally nourished patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis compared with the effect of PR plus an oral nutritional supplement (PRONS). METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial, parallel treatment design in which participants were randomly assigned to receive PR for 12 wk or PR plus a high-protein nutritional supplement enriched with beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate. Outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 12 and 24 wk including cardiopulmonary exercise testing, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), bronchorrhea, dyspnea, psychological symptoms, spirometry, and exacerbations. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized into 2 groups of 15 participants. In both groups, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, HRQOL, dyspnea, and spirometry parameters significantly increased from baseline at 3 and/or 6 mo. CONCLUSION: PR improved exercise capacity, HRQOL, and respiratory parameters. The use of PRONS did not have a significant effect on the results.

Dual antibiotics for bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by abnormal and irreversible dilatation of the smaller airways and associated with a mortality rate greater than twice that of the general population. Antibiotics serve as front-line therapy for managing bacterial load, but their use is weighed against the development of antibiotic resistance. Dual antibiotic therapy has the potential to suppress infection from multiple strains of bacteria, leading to more successful treatment of exacerbations, reduced symptoms, and improved quality of life. Further evidence is required on the efficacy of dual antibiotics in terms of management of exacerbations and extent of antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of dual antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis. SEARCH METHODS: We identified studies from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (CAGR), which includes the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), and PsycINFO, as well as studies obtained by handsearching of journals/abstracts. We also searched the following trial registries: US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We imposed no restriction on language of publication. We conducted our search in October 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing dual antibiotics versus a single antibiotic for short-term (< 4 weeks) or long-term management of bronchiectasis diagnosed in adults and/or children by bronchography, plain film chest radiography, or high-resolution computed tomography. Primary outcomes included exacerbations, length of hospitalisation, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were response rates, emergence of resistance to antibiotics, systemic markers of infection, sputum volume and purulence, measures of lung function, adverse events/effects, deaths, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. We did not apply outcome measures as selection criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of 287 records, along with the full text of seven reports. Two studies met review inclusion criteria. Two review authors independently extracted outcome data and assessed risk of bias. We extracted data from only one study and conducted GRADE assessments for the following outcomes: successful treatment of exacerbation; response rates; and serious adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Two randomised trials assessed the effectiveness of oral plus inhaled dual therapy versus oral monotherapy in a total of 118 adults with a mean age of 62.8 years. One multi-centre trial compared inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin alone, and one single-centre trial compared nebulised gentamicin plus systemic antibiotics versus a systemic antibiotic alone. Published papers did not report study funding sources.Effect estimates from one small study with 53 adults showed no evidence of treatment benefit with oral plus inhaled dual therapy for the following primary outcomes at the end of the study: successful management of exacerbation - cure at day 42 (odds ratio (OR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 2.01; 53 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence); number of participants with Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication at day 21 (OR 2.33, 95% CI 0.66 to 8.24; 53 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence); and serious adverse events (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.87; 53 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence). Similarly, researchers provided no evidence of treatment benefit for the following secondary outcomes: clinical response rates - relapse at day 42 (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.69; 53 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence); microbiological response rate at day 21 - eradicated (OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.67 to 8.65; 53 participants; one study; very low-quality evidence); and adverse events - incidence of wheeze (OR 5.75, 95% CI 1.55 to 21.33). Data show no evidence of benefit in terms of sputum volume, lung function, or antibiotic resistance. Outcomes from a second small study with 65 adults, available only as an abstract, were not included in the quantitative data synthesis. The included studies did not report our other primary outcomes: duration; frequency; and time to next exacerbation; nor our secondary outcomes: systemic markers of infection; exercise capacity; and quality of life. We did not identify any trials that included children. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A small number of studies in adults have generated high-quality evidence that is insufficient to inform robust conclusions, and studies in children have provided no evidence. We identified only one dual-therapy combination of oral and inhaled antibiotics. Results from this single trial of 53 adults that we were able to include in the quantitative synthesis showed no evidence of treatment benefit with oral plus inhaled dual therapy in terms of successful treatment of exacerbations, serious adverse events, sputum volume, lung function, and antibiotic resistance. Further high-quality research is required to determine the efficacy and safety of other combinations of dual antibiotics for both adults and children with bronchiectasis, particularly in terms of antibiotic resistance.