The effects of intravenous lipid emulsion on hemodynamic recovery and myocardial cell mitochondrial function after bupivacaine toxicity in anesthetized pigs.

Local anesthetic toxicity is thought to be mediated partly by inhibition of cardiac mitochondrial function. Intravenous (i.v.) lipid emulsion may overcome this energy depletion, but doses larger than currently recommended may be needed for rescue effect. In this randomized study with anesthetized pigs, we compared the effect of a large dose, 4 mL/kg, of i.v. 20% Intralipid® ( n = 7) with Ringer's acetate ( n = 6) on cardiovascular recovery after a cardiotoxic dose of bupivacaine. We also examined mitochondrial respiratory function in myocardial cell homogenates analyzed promptly after needle biopsies from the animals. Bupivacaine plasma concentrations were quantified from plasma samples. Arterial blood pressure recovered faster and systemic vascular resistance rose more rapidly after Intralipid than Ringer's acetate administration ( p < 0.0001), but Intralipid did not increase cardiac index or left ventricular ejection fraction. The lipid-based mitochondrial respiration was stimulated by approximately 30% after Intralipid ( p < 0.05) but unaffected by Ringer's acetate. The mean (standard deviation) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of total bupivacaine was greater after Intralipid (105.2 (13.6) mg·min/L) than after Ringer's acetate (88.1 (7.1) mg·min/L) ( p = 0.019). After Intralipid, the AUC of the lipid-un-entrapped bupivacaine portion (97.0 (14.5) mg·min/L) was 8% lower than that of total bupivacaine ( p < 0.0001). To conclude, 4 mL/kg of Intralipid expedited cardiovascular recovery from bupivacaine cardiotoxicity mainly by increasing systemic vascular resistance. The increased myocardial mitochondrial respiration and bupivacaine entrapment after Intralipid did not improve cardiac function.

The Effect of Lipid Emulsion on Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine in Rats: Long-Chain Triglyceride Versus Long- and Medium-Chain Triglyceride.

BACKGROUND: Lipid infusions have been proposed to treat local anesthetic-induced cardiac toxicity. This study compared the effects of long-chain triglyceride (LCT) emulsions with those of long- and medium-chain triglyceride (LCT/MCT) emulsions on the pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine in a rat model. METHODS: After administration of intravenous infusion of bupivacaine at 2 mg·kg·min for 5 minutes in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, either Intralipid 20%, an LCT emulsion (LCT group, n = 6), or Lipovenoes 20%, an LCT/MCT emulsion (LCT/MCT group, n = 6), was infused at 2mg·kg·min for 5 minutes. The concentrations of total plasma bupivacaine and bupivacaine that were not bound by lipid (lipid unbound) were measured by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. A 2-compartmental analysis was performed to calculate the lipid-bound percentage of bupivacaine and its pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: In the LCT group, the clearance (15 ± 2 vs 10 ± 1 mL·min·kg, P = .003) was higher; the volume of distribution (0.57 ± 0.10 vs 0.36 ± 0.11 L·kg, P = .007) and K21 (0.0100 ± 0.0018 vs 0.0070 ± 0.0020 min, P = .021, P' = .032) were larger; and the area under the blood concentration-time curve 0 - t; (605 ± 82 vs 867 ± 110 mgL·min, P =.001) and the area under the blood concentration-time curve (0 - ∞) (697 ± 111 vs 991 ± 121 mgL·min, P =.001) were less, when compared with the LCT/MCT group. CONCLUSIONS: LCT emulsions are more effective than LCT/MCT emulsions in the metabolism of bupivacaine through demonstration of a superior pharmacokinetic profile.

Local pathology and systemic serum bupivacaine after subcutaneous delivery of slow-releasing bupivacaine microspheres.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged local anesthesia, particularly desirable to minimize acute and chronic postoperative pain, has been provided by microspheres that slowly release bupivacaine (MS-Bup). In this study, we report on the systemic drug concentrations and the local dermatopathology that occur after subcutaneous injection of MS-Bup. METHODS: Rats (approximately 300 g) were injected under the dorsolumbar skin with MS-Bup containing 40 mg of bupivacaine (base) or with 0.4 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine-HCl (BupHCl; 1.78 mg bupivacaine). Blood was drawn, under sevoflurane anesthesia, at 10 minutes to 144 hours, and the serum analyzed for total bupivacaine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In different animals, skin punch biopsies (4 mm) were taken at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after the same drug injections, sectioned at 5 µm, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Samples from skin injected with BupHCl, with MS-Bup suspended in carboxymethyl cellulose (MS-Bup.CMC), or in methyl cellulose (MS-Bup.MC) were compared with their respective drug-free controls (placebos). RESULTS: Serum bupivacaine reached a maximal average value (n = 8) of 194.9 ng/mL at 8 hours after injection of MS-Bup (95% upper prediction limit = 230.2 ng/mL), compared with the maximal average (n = 6) serum level of 374.9 ng/mL (95% prediction limit = 470.6 ng/mL) at 30 minutes after injection of BupHCl. Serum bupivacaine decreased to undetectable levels (<3.23 ng/mL) at 8 hours after BupHCl and was detectable at approximately 20% of the maximal value at 144 hours after MS-Bup injection. BupHCl injection resulted in moderate lymphocytic infiltration of skeletal muscle at 1 and 3 days. MS-Bup.CMC and placebo-CMC caused extensive infiltration of macrophages, lymphocytes, and some neutrophils at 1 to 7 days, whereas MS-Bup.MC and placebo-MC caused only mild inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous administration of microspheres releasing bupivacaine results in lower blood levels lasting for much longer times than those from bupivacaine solution.

In vitro and in vivo entrapment of bupivacaine by lipid dispersions.

Intravenous lipid emulsion is recommended as treatment for local anesthetic intoxication based on the hypothesis that the lipophilic drug is entrapped by the lipid phase created in plasma. We compared a 15.6 mM 80/20 mol% phosphatidyl choline (PC)/phosphatidyl glycerol (PG)-based liposome dispersion with the commercially available Intralipid® emulsion in a pig model of local anesthetic intoxication. Bupivacaine-lipid interactions were studied by electrokinetic capillary chromatography. Multilamellar vesicles were used in the first in vivo experiment series. This series was interrupted when the liposome dispersion was discovered to cause cardiovascular collapse. The toxicity was decreased by an optimized sonication of the 50% diluted liposome dispersion (7.8 mM). Twenty anesthetized pigs were then infused with either sonicated PC/PG liposome dispersion or Intralipid®, following infusion of a toxic dose of bupivacaine which decreased the mean arterial pressure by 50% from baseline. Bupivacaine concentrations were quantified in blood samples using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. No significant difference in the context-sensitive plasma half-life of bupivacaine was detected (p=0.932). After 30 min of lipid infusion, the bupivacaine concentration was 8.2±1.5 mg/L in the PC/PG group and 7.8±1.8 mg/L in the Intralipid® group, with no difference between groups (p=0.591). No difference in hemodynamic recovery was detected between groups (p > 0.05).

Local infiltration analgesia with levobupivacaine compared with intrathecal morphine in total hip arthroplasty patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has been promoted for pain control after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that LIA would offer equal analgesic efficacy but less adverse effects, e.g., nausea and vomiting, when compared with an established regimen [intrathecal morphine (it-M)] after THA. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial comprised 60 patients undergoing THA under spinal anaesthesia. For LIA, the surgeon administered levobupivacaine, ketorolac and epinephrine at the surgical site intraoperatively. LIA patients received a LIA top-up through a wound catheter on the morning of the 1st post-operative day (POD). In group it-M, 0.1 mg morphine was given together with the spinal anaesthetic. Study parameters included pain scores, vital parameters and side effects, e.g., post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Besides, levobupivacaine plasma concentrations were determined in 10 LIA patients. RESULTS: The median (25th/75th percentiles) rescue oxycodone demand differed significantly with LIA 15 (10/25) mg vs. 8.5 (1.5/15) mg with it-M (P < 0.006) during the day of surgery, but not anymore on 1st or 2nd POD. The LIA top-up had no effect. However, both analgesic regimens resulted in comparable pain scores and patient satisfaction. PONV incidence and medication did not vary significantly. LIA offered certain advantages regarding early post-operative mobilization. Maximum levobupivacaine plasma concentrations (229-580 ng/ml) remained under the toxic level. CONCLUSIONS: While LIA might enable earlier mobilization after THA, it was not associated with less nausea as compared with it-M. Less rescue oxycodone was given early after it-M, but urinary retention was more common in that group.

Resuscitation strategies from bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetic (LA) intoxication with cardiovascular arrest is a potential fatal complication of regional anesthesia. Lipid resuscitation has been recommended for the treatment of LA-induced cardiac arrest. Aim of the study was to compare four different rescue regimens using epinephrine and/or lipid emulsion and vasopressin to treat cardiac arrest caused by bupivacaine intoxication. METHODS: Twenty-eight piglets were randomized into four groups (4 × 7), anesthetized with sevoflurane, intubated, and ventilated. Bupivacaine was infused with a syringe driver via central venous catheter at a rate of 1 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1) until circulatory arrest. Bupivacaine infusion and sevoflurane were then stopped, chest compression was started, and the pigs were ventilated with 100% oxygen. After 1 min, epinephrine 10 µg·kg(-1) (group 1), Intralipid(®) 20% 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 2), epinephrine 10 µg·kg(-1) + Intralipid(®) 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 3) or 2 IU vasopressin + Intralipid(®) 4 ml·kg(-1) (group 4) were administered. Secondary epinephrine doses were given after 5 min if required. RESULTS: Survival was 71%, 29%, 86%, and 57% in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4. Return of spontaneous circulation was regained only by initial administration of epinephrine alone or in combination with Intralipid(®). Piglets receiving the combination therapy survived without further epinephrine support. In contrast, in groups 2 and 4, return of spontaneous circulation was only achieved after secondary epinephrine rescue. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac arrest caused by bupivacaine intoxication, first-line rescue with epinephrine and epinephrine + Intralipid(®) was more effective with regard to survival than Intralipid(®) alone and vasopressin + Intralipid(®) in this pig model.

Intravenous lipid emulsion only minimally influences bupivacaine and mepivacaine distribution in plasma and does not enhance recovery from intoxication in pigs.

BACKGROUND: The reported successful use of IV lipid emulsions in local anesthetic intoxications is thought to be due to lipid sequestration of local anesthetics. However, controlled efficacy studies were lacking, and other mechanisms of action have also been suggested. We investigated the effect of lipid infusion on plasma concentrations and cardiovascular effects of 2 local anesthetics differing in lipophilicity, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine. METHODS: Bupivacaine (n = 20) or mepivacaine (n = 20) was infused into a central vein of anesthetized (isoflurane 1%, Fio(2) 0.21) pigs until mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 50% from baseline. Isoflurane was discontinued and Fio(2) was increased to 1.0. Ten pigs in each local anesthetic group were treated with 20% lipid emulsion (ClinOleic®), and 10 pigs with Ringer's solution: 1.5 mL/kg in 1 minute followed by an infusion of 0.25 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1) for 29 minutes. Five additional pigs were infused bupivacaine and Intralipid®. Total and nonlipid-bound local anesthetic concentrations were determined from repeated blood samples. RESULTS: There were no overall differences in total or nonlipid-bound plasma local anesthetic concentrations between the lipid and Ringer's groups. However, plasma median total bupivacaine concentration was 21% and 23% higher at 20 and 30 minutes, respectively, in the lipid group (P = 0.016 without Holm-Bonferroni correction). There was also no overall difference between lipid and Ringer's groups in the rate of recovery of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables. Median mean arterial blood pressure in the lipid group with bupivacaine intoxication was 16 mm Hg and 15 mm Hg higher than in the corresponding Ringer's group at 10 and 15 minutes, respectively (P = 0.016 and P = 0.021, respectively, without Holm-Bonferroni correction). Intralipid® also caused no difference between total plasma and nonlipid-bound concentrations of bupivacaine with no apparent enhancement of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid emulsion neither had any measurable effect on the disposition of the studied local anesthetics in plasma, nor did it improve the rate of recovery from intoxication by either local anesthetic as measured by hemodynamic variables.

Lipid resuscitation of bupivacaine toxicity: long-chain triglyceride emulsion provides benefits over long- and medium-chain triglyceride emulsion.

BACKGROUND: The superiority of Intralipid, a long-chain triglyceride (LCT) emulsion versus Lipovenoes, a long- and medium-chain triglyceride (LCT/MCT) emulsion, in reversing local anesthetic-induced cardiac arrest is poorly defined and needs to be determined. METHODS: The study included two parts: in experiment A, bupivacaine (20 mg/kg) was injected to produce asystole. Either Intralipid 20% (LCT group, n = 30) or Lipovenoes 20% (LCT/MCT group, n = 30) with epinephrine was infused immediately. Return of spontaneous circulation and recurrence of asystole after resuscitation were recorded. In experiment B, 80 rats using the same model and resuscitation protocol were divided into 10 groups: LCT0, LCT15, LCT30, LCT60, and LCT120 and LCT/MCT0, LCT/MCT15, LCT/MCT30, LCT/MCT60, and LCT/MCT120 (n = 8 each; the subscripts represent respective observation period). LCT15-LCT120 and LCT/MCT15-LCT/MCT120 groups received Intralipid 20% or Lipovenoes 20%, respectively. Plasma and myocardial bupivacaine and triglyceride concentrations, as well as myocardial bioenergetics, were determined. RESULTS: In experiment A, 24 rats in LCT group and 23 in LCT/MCT group achieved return of spontaneous circulation (P = 0.754); among them, 2 (8.3%) and 8 (34.8%) rats suffered a repeated asystole, respectively (P = 0.027). In experiment B, plasma and myocardial bupivacaine concentrations in LCT15 and LCT60 groups were lower than LCT/MCT15 and LCT/MCT60 groups, respectively. Furthermore, the plasma bupivacaine level in LCT/MCT60 group was higher than LCT/MCT30 group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: LCT emulsion may be superior to LCT/MCT emulsion in treating bupivacaine-related cardiotoxicity as it was associated with fewer recurrences of asystole after resuscitation and lower myocardial bupivacaine concentrations.

Topical anaesthesia alleviates short-term pain of castration and tail docking in lambs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation on pain alleviation, wound healing and systemic levels of local anaesthetic actives in lambs undergoing castration and tail docking. DESIGN: Three placebo-controlled and/or randomised experiments were conducted using three groups of Merino lambs (n = 62, 68 and 19) undergoing routine castration and tail docking. PROCEDURE: Surgical castration, with either surgical or hot-iron tail docking, was performed with and without the application of topical anaesthetic (Tri-Solfen) or placebo. The effects of this procedure were compared with those of rubber ring castration and tail docking, and of the handled but unmarked controls. Wound pain was assessed using calibrated Von-Frey monofilaments over a 4-h period, pain-related behaviour was assessed over 5 h, wound healing was assessed at 14 and 28 days, and the plasma levels of lignocaine and bupivacaine were determined. RESULTS: Rapid and up to 4 h primary hyperalgesia developed following surgical castration and tail docking in the untreated and placebo-treated lambs. It was absent in the castration wounds, and significantly reduced in the tail-docking wounds, of the treated lambs. Hot-iron docking was associated with mild and transient secondary hyperalgesia, which was abolished by the topical anaesthesia. There was a significant reduction in pain-related behaviours in treated lambs, which were not significantly different in their behaviour to the sham-operation handled controls. Plasma lignocaine and bupivacaine levels were below the toxic thresholds in all tested lambs. CONCLUSION: Topical anaesthesia alleviates wound pain and significantly reduces pain-related behaviours in lambs undergoing surgical castration plus surgical or hot-iron tail docking, without a negative effect on wound healing or a risk of systemic toxicity.

Comparative efficacy and pharmacokinetics of racemic bupivacaine and S-bupivacaine in third molar surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of racemic bupivacaine (rac-bupivacaine) with S-bupivacaine as primary local anesthetic agent in bilateral impacted third molar extractions. METHOD: A randomised, double blind, two period cross-over design was employed. Six subjects (2 males, 4 females; age 19-25 years; weight 69.2+/-9.4 kg) received bupivacaine hydrochloride injection (6.6 ml) as rac-bupivacaine (0.5% as salt) or S-bupivacaine (0.5% as base) prior to extraction of impacted third molars on one side and three weeks later on the other side. Anesthesia, blood loss associated with surgery and post-operative pain experience were evaluated. Plasma samples were analysed for bupivacaine enantiomers by chiral HPLC. RESULTS: In 7/12 operations, anesthesia adequate for surgery was delayed (>10 min) or unsatisfactory requiring lidocaine rescue medication. Despite this, there were no significant differences in onset and duration of anesthesia, blood loss or post-operative pain experience between the two arms of the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different and there was no evidence of chiral inversion after dosing with S-bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Both study drugs were inadequate as single anesthetic agent for third molar surgery. Any decision to use S-bupivacaine for oral surgery must rest on evidence that it is less toxic than the racemic drug.

In vivo release of bupivacaine from subcutaneously administered oily solution. Comparison with in vitro release.

A non-randomized cross-over study was performed with bupivacaine HCl (5 mg x ml(-1)) aqueous solution and bupivacaine free base (4.44 mg x ml(-1)) in Viscoleo/castor oil 2:1 (v/v) administered s.c. to male Wistar rats. Plasma levels were analyzed by LC-MS. Plasma profiles obtained after administration of oily solution showed a prolonged bupivacaine release with lower peak plasma levels as compared to administration of an aqueous formulation applied in the same compartment. t(1/2), t(max), C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) for the aqueous solution were 63+/-8 min, 19+/-16 min, 194+/-46 ng x ml(-1) and 25,000+/-3000 ng min x ml(-1), respectively, while the corresponding data for the oil solution were 368+/-89 min, 334+/-186 min, 36+/-25 ng x ml(-1) and 25,000+/-6000 ng x min x ml(-1). The present data indicate the potential of designing an oil formulation of bupivacaine with a prolonged local analgetic effect exhibiting a minimum of systemic toxicity. In vivo release of bupivacaine from the oil solution was evaluated by a numerical deconvolution method. In vivo release kinetics was found to be first-order and corresponded well with in vitro release kinetics found using a rotating dialysis cell. This led to establishment of an in vitro/in vivo correlation for this particular formulation.

Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine in peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

Peribulbar anaesthesia with 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine, both with hyaluronidase, was assessed in a prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 100 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 22 subjects. Akinesia of the globe developed slightly more rapidly in the ropivacaine group, but this difference was only statistically significant at 2 min after injection of the local anaesthetic. Lid akinesia was significantly more complete in the ropivacaine group. There were no differences between the groups with respect to peri-operative analgesia or duration of akinesia. The dose-adjusted maximum concentration of ropivacaine was approximately twice that of bupivacaine with significantly higher values of the area under the concentration-time curves. No drug-related adverse effects were observed. We conclude that there are no clinically significant differences in the quality of the sensory and motor block between 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine when used for peribulbar anaesthesia.

The safety of topical anaesthetic and analgesic agents in a gel when used to provide pain relief at split skin donor sites.

Post operative pain from split skin donor sites is a recognised problem. This study was carried out to assess the safety of a 'depot' preparation of bupivacaine and ketoprofen when applied to denuded dermis of a split donor site. Two groups of six patients each received either bupivacaine gel (2.5 mg/ml) or ketoprofen gel (1.6 mg/ml). One patient from each group was excluded as protocol was not followed. The mean surface area for bupivacaine was 106 cm2 (range 64-160) and the mean for ketoprofen was 130 cm2 (range 64-180). Blood samples were obtained before application and at 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 min after application. Serum levels were assayed using Gas Liquid Chromatography and High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. Bupivacaine levels peaked at 120 min, mean level obtained was 0.07 microgram/ml (range 0.03-0.1). Ketoprofen levels also peaked at 120 min and the mean level obtained was 0.20 microgram/ml (range 0.12-0.27). The reported toxic serum level for bupivacaine was 4 micrograms/ml and for ketoprofen is 1128 micrograms/ml. In conclusion, these preparations, when applied to denuded dermis of a split skin donor site, are unlikely to result in toxic levels.

Comparison of lidocaine with and without bupivacaine for local dental anesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine and that of lidocaine alone for local dental anesthesia. First, on different days, healthy volunteers were given 2% lidocaine with 1/80,000 epinephrine or 2% lidocaine with 1/80,000 epinephrine + 0.5% bupivacaine, after which pain was produced with a pulp tester. No difference was found in the time until onset of anesthetic effect between the preparations. However, the duration of anesthetic effect was longer with both lidocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaine alone. Next, patients undergoing dental surgery were given one of the anesthetic preparations, after which serum concentrations of the anesthetics and epinephrine were measured. The maximal serum concentration of lidocaine was higher and was reached sooner after injection in patients receiving lidocaine alone (1.74 microgram/ml after 5 min) than in patients receiving both anesthetics (0.85 microgram/ml after 3 min). The mean maximal serum concentration of lidocaine was higher in patients receiving lidocaine alone (1.77 +/- 0.03 microgram/ml) than in those receiving both anesthetics (0.99 +/- 0.45 microgram/ml). Furthermore, the mean plasma concentration of epinephrine 1 min after injection was significantly higher in patients receiving lidocaine alone (0.671 ng/ml) than in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine (0.323 ng/ml). The results of this study suggest that the combination of lidocaine with epinephrine and bupivacaine produces lower systemic levels of the anesthetic and epinephrine and a longer duration of activity than lidocaine with epinephrine alone for local dental anesthesia.

Venous levels of lignocaine and bupivacaine after peribulbar block.

Twenty-five patients undergoing elective cataract day surgery were studied after receiving a dual-injection peribulbar block with a mixture consisting of equal volumes of 2% lignocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine with hyaluronidase. A maximum of 10 ml of solution was used for the initial block; supplementary injections of up to 10 ml were given to five patients. Venous blood was taken prior to the block and then 1, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 90 min after the block. The peak mean concentrations of lignocaine (0.722 microgram.ml-1) and bupivacaine (0.353 microgram.ml-1) were found at 10-20 min after injection when no top-up was given and at 10 min after the top-up injection when required. All measured serum concentrations of lignocaine and bupivacaine were below the accepted toxic levels of the two drugs. However, the highest individual toxicity score after a top-up was 0.915 which was very close to the toxicity threshold (= 1) when a scoring system was used to assess the combined levels.

[Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and bupivacaine after peribulbar block with additional hyaluronidase]. / Pharmacocinétique de la lidocaïne et de la bupivacaïne après bloc péribulbaire avec adjonction d'hyaluronidase.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time course of plasma concentrations of lidocaine and bupivacaine associated with hyaluronidase for peribulbar block. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS: Ten patients (mean age = 71 +/- 11 yrs, mean weight 63 +/- 10 kg) scheduled for cataract surgery with lens implantation. METHOD: Lidocaine 2% (5.5 mL = 110 mg) and bupivacaine 0.5% (5.5 mL = 27.5 mg) associated with hyaluronidase (80 IU) were injected supra and infra-orbitally, in patients premedicated with midazolam. Blood samples wer0 collected at constant time intervals from the end of infiltration until the 6th hour. The plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were measured with the HPLC technique. RESULTS: The median plasma peak concentration was 1.74 mg.L-1 after 10 min for lidocaine, and 0.52 mg.L-1 after 7.5 min for bupivacaine respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The similar delays of occurrence of peak concentrations confirm that liposolubility is not the only factor of diffusion of local anaesthetics from the periocular fat into the blood stream. The peak concentrations are far below the alleged toxic concentrations. When associated with hyaluronidase, the peak concentrations occur as rapidly as after endotracheal or paracervical administration.

Rapid simultaneous determination of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and their two main metabolites using capillary gas-liquid chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detector.

A gas-liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous measurement in serum of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and their main metabolites, 2,6-pipecolylxylidide (PPX) and monoethylglycine xylidide (MEGX), respectively, is described. The procedure involves a one-step extraction and injection of the extract into a gas chromatograph equipped with a capillary column and nitrogen phosphorus detector under constant temperature conditions. Recovery of all components averaged 94%, with the lowest detection limit of 15 ng/ml for the four drugs. The precision within-series coefficients of variation ranged from 7.7% for bupivacaine, 8.6% for lidocaine, 10.2% for MEGX, and 15.8% for PPX. The interday coefficients ranged from 0.7 to 6.5%. Concomitant use of caffeine and carbamazepine may interfere with MEGX and bupivacaine determination, respectively. For this reason, in patients receiving one of these two drugs (or ingesting foods and beverages containing caffeine), the described method is not recommended.

Serum bupivacaine levels during laparoscopic sterilization using local anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the serum levels of bupivacaine during laparoscopic sterilization when bupivacaine 0.5% without epinephrine is used as the sole local anesthetic agent. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Regional medical center and primary teaching hospital of Ob/Gyn Department of the University of Tennessee, Memphis. PATIENTS; Thirty women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization with bupivacaine for local anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Venous serum bupivacaine levels were measured, with samples drawn at 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after injection in 25 patients. Five additional patients had sampling at 15 and 30 minutes as well as at the above times. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The highest concentration of bupivacaine was detected at 15 minutes. The mean concentrations at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 minutes were 0.86, 0.74, 0.31, 0.27, 0.23, and 0.22 microg/ml, respectively. This is well below the level of serious toxicity. Only four patients received 2.5 mg/kg or greater of bupivacaine. In these patients, mean serum levels were 1.1, 1.0, 0.28, 0.43, 0.9, and 0.29 microg/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum bupivacaine levels during sterilization using bupivacaine 0.5% without epinephrine for local anesthesia are well below the threshold for serious toxicity.

Bupivacaine kinetics during hyperthermia in rats.

The aim of this study was to document possible alterations of bupivacaine pharmacokinetic behaviour in rats during hyperthermia. Two groups of Wistar AF IO PS male rats (Group A = normothermic controls, Group B = hyperthermia-induced animals) received a single 20 mg.kg-1 ip dose of bupivacaine. Two other groups (Group C = normothermic controls without bupivacaine, Group D = hyperthermia-induced animals without bupivacaine) received, under the same experimental conditions, an equivalent volume of saline. Hyperthermia-induced animals (Groups B and D) were placed in a water-bath at 40 degrees C. Bupivacaine or saline were administered (Group B and D) four hours after the beginning of the experiment and blood samples were obtained by retro-orbital sinus puncture 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 hr after administration. Bupivacaine and its main metabolite, 2,6 desbutylbupivacaine (PPX) were assayed according to a gas liquid chromatographic method. The Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, Cl, Vd and AUC were determined according to a two compartment open model. Our data have demonstrated a decrease in clearance of bupivacaine (5.85 +/- 0.23 ml.hr-1 and 4.59 +/- 0.35 ml.hr-1 for groups A and B, respectively, P < 0.05, and, Tmax of PPX during hyperthermia (0.24 +/- 0.03 hr and 0.15 +/- 0.0 hr for Groups A and B, respectively, P < 0.05). In conclusion, hyperthermia induces a decrease in bupivacaine clearance in rats which may be of importance in clinical practice.