A comparative cost-utility analysis of postoperative calcium supplementation strategies used in the current management of hypocalcemia.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic hypocalcemia is a common complication of total thyroidectomy. Management strategies include responsive treatment initiation for symptoms or prevention by routine or parathyroid hormone-directed calcium supplementation. The comparative cost-effectiveness of even the most often utilized strategies is unclear. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was created to compare routine supplementation with calcium alone (RS), postoperative parathyroid hormone-based selective supplementation with calcium and calcitriol (SS), and no supplementation (NS) in asymptomatic patients. Patients could remain asymptomatic or develop symptomatic hypocalcemia, managed with outpatient oral supplementation or intravenous calcium infusion and administered either inpatient or outpatient. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model parameter assumptions. RESULTS: RS was the preferred strategy, costing $329/patient and resulting in 0.497 quality-adjusted life years, which was only marginally better compared to SS ($373 for 0.495 quality-adjusted life years). NS was most costly at $4,955 for 0.491 quality-adjusted life years. Preference for RS over SS was sensitive to the probability of developing symptoms and the probability of symptom treatment with intravenous supplementation. On probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RS was preferred in 75.4% of scenarios. CONCLUSION: After total thyroidectomy, a preventative calcium supplementation strategy should be strongly considered. In this data-driven theoretical model, RS was the least costly option and resulted in an incremental gain in quality-adjusted life years.

A Cost-utility Analysis of Calcipotriol/Betamethasone Dipropionate Aerosol Foam versus Ointment for the Topical Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris in Sweden.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that imposes a substantial economic burden. We conducted a cost-utility analysis from a Swedish healthcare payers perspective using a decision-tree model with a 12-week time horizon. Patients with psoriasis vulgaris could have two 4-week cycles of topical treatment with calcipotriol 50 µg/g and betamethasone 0.5 mg/g as dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam or Cal/BD ointment before progressing to phototherapy/methotrexate. In the base-case analysis, Cal/BD foam dominated over Cal/BD ointment. The increased efficacy of Cal/BD foam resulted in fewer consultations and a decreased risk of progressing to phototherapy/methotrexate. Although Cal/BD foam costs more than Cal/BD ointment, this was offset by lower costs for phototherapy/methotrexate or consultation visits. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the base-case net monetary benefit was robust to plausible variations in key parameters. In conclusion, Cal/BD foam was predicted to be more cost-effective than Cal/BD ointment in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.

The two-compound formulation of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate for treatment of moderately severe body and scalp psoriasis - an introduction.

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease and many patients require lifelong treatment. Characteristic scaly, itchy, unsightly psoriatic lesions affect many body areas and most patients commonly experience scalp involvement. The cosmetic embarrassment of visible body lesions, inaccessibility of scalp skin to application of therapies and proximity of sensitive facial skin add to the challenges of most patients managing their psoriasis long term. Psoriasis can severely impact patients' quality of life. This can impact significantly on the patient. In economic terms patients may incur increased out-of-pocket expenditure or extended time away from work as a direct consequence of psoriasis, particularly in severe cases; In many countries, specialist review of patients provides pressures on hard-pressed services and the costs of psoriasis care are substantial, particularly in patients with severe recalcitrant psoriasis which may require lengthy inpatient admission. Around 80% of patients with psoriasis have mild to moderately severe disease and the majority are treated with topical medicines by their physician in primary care. Despite the availability of a wide range of treatment options, regimens have been unsatisfactory, associated with patient dissatisfaction, poor compliance and often safety concerns with long-term use. Evidence-based clinical guidelines aim to improve healthcare of patients and while there are such guidelines for psoriasis, to date the challenges of (and recommendations for) managing scalp psoriasis are often limited or missing from these treatment guidelines. In the following in-journal supplement, a connected suite of five papers focus on the use of topical therapies for the treatment of the person afflicted with psoriasis. This work harnesses robust evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of topical therapies commonly used in psoriasis patients and translates this into recommendations for the most appropriate treatment of patients with body or scalp psoriasis, from an efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness perspective. Based upon systematic review and harnessing 'state of the art' evidence assessment methodologies, the modelling work suggests that the use of a two-compound formulation (TCF) product of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate is the most appropriate treatment option for both body and scalp psoriasis. This Editorial acknowledges the results of any modelling exercise have limitations; indeed such limitations are acknowledged in each modelling contribution in this issue. With these caveats in mind, this introductory paper considers the implications of this research and distillation of the evidence. This work should guide cost-effective treatment choices for body and scalp psoriasis, assist in recommendations for management of scalp psoriasis in future iterations of psoriasis clinical guidelines and help primary care physicians striving to attain best outcomes in the care of the person with psoriasis.

Shopping for psoriasis medications on the Internet.

BACKGROUND: Numerous consumer products, including medicines, can be bought over the Internet. Previous reports indicate that patients are able to purchase the current available treatments, including expensive systemic and biological agents with side-effects, available for use on an outpatient basis. In France, as in most industrialized countries, these drug treatments are available only by prescription. Objective To evaluate whether psoriatic outpatients can buy the full range of psoriasis medications, including biological therapies, without a prescription, via the Internet. METHODS: One investigator acted as a consumer to purchase psoriasis treatments and complementary medicines over the Internet. The website search was limited to a 4-h period. All products had to be available for delivery in France, without a prescription, and be suitable for outpatient use. Key words for the Internet search were combinations of medicinal product names, 'psoriasis', 'shopping', 'pharmacy', 'parapharmacy', entered into two major search engines, Google and Yahoo. RESULTS: The investigator identified 47 websites offering a total of 340 products. All treatments, including biological therapies (etanercept, adalumimab and efaluzimab), were available for purchase with the exception of calcitriol and alefacept, with median prices being higher than the French price. CONCLUSION: This study shows that it is possible for consumers to purchase the majority of treatments for psoriasis via the Internet, including systemic therapies and even the most recent and expensive products such as biological agents, without a prescription.

Calcipotriol ointment. A review of its use in the management of psoriasis.

UNLABELLED: Calcipotriol, a vitamin D3 analog, acts not only to inhibit cell proliferation and enhance cell differentiation in the skin of patients with psoriasis, but also appears to have effects on immunologic markers that are thought to play a role in the etiology of the disease. In several well designed, short term studies in adults, calcipotriol ointment 50 micrograms/g twice daily provided similar or superior efficacy to several other antipsoriatic agents in adult patients with mild to moderate psoriasis. In patients with nonscalp psoriasis, the drug provided superior efficacy to twice daily placebo (vehicle ointment), twice daily fluocinonide 500 micrograms/g, once daily tacalcitol 4 micrograms/g and twice daily coal tar 5% plus allantoin 2% and hydrocortisone 0.5%. Furthermore, calcipotriol therapy generally provided superior efficacy to twice daily betamethasone valerate 1 to 1.2 mg/g or once daily dithranol 1 to 20 mg/g, and similar efficacy to twice daily betamethasone dipropionate plus salicylic acid or once daily maxacalcitol 6 to 50 micrograms/g. Limited data indicated that calcipotriol ointment 50 micrograms/g also improved overall disease severity in children. In combination with other antipsoriatic agents [acitretin, cyclosporine, betamethasone valerate, halobetasol (ulobetasol)], ultraviolet B or psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA) phototherapy, calcipotriol ointment 50 micrograms/g twice daily improved the beneficial effects of these drugs on overall disease severity in adult patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Furthermore, in separate trials, calcipotriol combination therapy reduced the dosage of acitretin required to achieve clearance of psoriasis and the duration of PUVA and dosage of UVA phototherapy, potentially improving the benefit/risk ratio for these other antipsoriatic treatments. Calcipotriol was generally well tolerated in short and long term studies in adult patients, with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in intensity and transient. The most common adverse events associated with calcipotriol therapy were dermatologic in nature and included lesional or perilesional irritations, face and scalp irritations, worsening of psoriasis and miscellaneous dermatologic events. Notably, there have been very few reports of patients developing hypercalcemia or hypercalciuria during calcipotriol therapy, with most occurring in patients who exceeded the recommended dosage of 100 g/week. Although data in children are limited, the drug was well tolerated with the nature and incidence of adverse effects similar to those observed in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive clinical experience, along with several short and long term clinical trials, has shown calcipotriol ointment to be an effective and well tolerated topical agent in adult patients with psoriasis. In addition, calcipotriol ointment proved beneficial in combination with other topical, phototherapy or systemic antipsoriatic treatments, reducing the dosage and/or duration of some of these treatments and potentially improving their benefit/risk ratio. Calcipotriol ointment is valuable as a first- or second-line therapy option for the management of mild to moderate psoriasis and in combination with other antipsoriatic agents for more severe psoriasis.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of calcipotriol (Daivonex/Dovonex) and UVB phototherapy in the treatment of psoriasis: a Markov model for The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence and chronic nature of psoriasis leads to high costs in relation to the treatment and control of the disease. A number of clinical trials have shown that a combination therapy of calcipotriol cream (Daivonex/Dovonex), Leo Pharmaceutical Products) and ultraviolet B phototherapy (UVB) decreases the total number of UVB exposures required compared to UVB treatment alone. From a societal point of view, the addition of calcipotriol to UVB therapy could achieve cost savings due to the fewer UVB treatments needed and the reduced travelling and time off work for patients. Fewer UVB exposures may also have other beneficial effects, i.e., shortened waiting lists and less risk to patients of developing cancer or photoaging of the skin. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of treating psoriatic patients in the Netherlands with calcipotriol cream used daily combined with twice weekly UVB treatments to emollient used daily combined with UVB given 3 times weekly. METHODS: Based on the clinical results from a Canadian trial, a decision-analytical model was constructed to simulate treatment outcomes and estimate the costs of managing psoriatic patients in the Netherlands over a period of 20 weeks from initiation of therapy. Unit costs and details of standard treatment protocols were collected from Dutch dermatology centres in hospitals and the community for use in the model. Other therapies, such as topical corticosteroids, tar or dithranol were not investigated in this analysis. RESULTS: The total cost of managing psoriatic patients in the Netherlands over a 20-week period is estimated as EUR 1,175.90 for those treated with calcipotriol and UVB and EUR 1,212.14 for patients treated with emollient and UVB. Thus, the former treatment, adding calcipotriol to UVB phototherapy, provides a minor cost saving of EUR 36.24 (3%) compared to the cost of UVB treatment alone. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that these results are sensitive to changes in the cost of UVB treatment. CONCLUSION: Calcipotriol treatment combined with UVB phototherapy is a cost-neutral alternative to UVB phototherapy used with an emollient. The patients achieve treatment success in the same time on both treatments but the former, with calcipotriol, requires less exposure to UVB radiation. The additional drug costs from using calcipotriol are offset by savings from the fewer UVB sessions required. Essential beneficial effects for patients are less inconvenience, less risk of developing photoaging of the skin and less exposure to potentially carcinogenic radiations.