"From hell to healed" - A qualitative study on women's experience of recovery, relationships and sexuality after severe obstetric perineal injury.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have investigated women's experiences of daily life after childbirth complicated by obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). The aim of the present study was to explore experiences related to recovery, sexual function, relationships and coping strategies among women affected by OASI. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of 11 women affected by OASI. Women were interviewed 1-2 years after their first childbirth. Inductive qualitative content analysis was applied. RESULTS: The theme "From hell to healed" illustrates women's experiences of recovery, relationships and sexual function after OASI. Three categories addressing women's perceptions emerged: "Challenged to the core", "At the mercy of the care provider" and "For better or for worse". Support from partners and family and comprehensive care were important elements for the experiences of coping and healing from OASI. Elements that negatively influenced women's experiences were the pain and physical symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction, normalization of symptoms by heath care providers, and unrealistic expectations about how this period in life should be experienced. CONCLUSION: OASI greatly affects women's experiences of their first years with their newborn child, relationships, social context and sexuality. For some women, OASI negatively affects everyday life for a long period after childbirth. However, others heal and cope quite quickly. Health care professionals need to identify and pay attention to women with persisting problems after OASI so that they can be directed to the right level of care.

The impact of a nationwide hands-on workshop on the diagnostic rates and management of obstetrical anal sphincter Injuries in Israel.

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the influence of a half day, hands-on, workshop on the detection and repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). METHOD: Starting in February 2011, hands-on workshops for the diagnosis and repair of OASIs were delivered by trained urogynaecologists in departments of tertiary medical centres in Israel. The structure of the hands-on workshop resembles the workshop organized at the International Urogynecological Association annual conferences. Participants included medical staff, midwives and surgical residents from each medical centre. We collected data regarding the rate of OASIs, 1 year before and 1 year following the workshop, in 11 medical centres. The study population was composed of parturients with the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation and vaginal delivery. Pre-viable preterm gestations (< 24 weeks), birth weight < 500 g, stillborn, and those with major congenital anomalies, multifoetal pregnancies, breech presentations and caesarean deliveries were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: In the reviewed centres, 70 663 (49.3%) women delivered prior to the workshop (pre-workshop group) and 72 616 (50.7%) women delivered following the workshop (post-workshop group). Third- or fourth-degree perineal tears occurred in 248 women (0.35%) before the workshop, and in 328 (0.45%) following the workshop, a significant increase of 28.7% (P = 0.002). The increase in diagnosis was significant also in women with third-degree tears alone, 226 women (0.32%) before the workshop and 298 (0.41%) following the workshop, an increase of 28.3% (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The detection rate of OASIs has significantly increased following the hands-on workshop. The implementation of such programmes is crucial for increasing awareness and detection rates of OASI following vaginal deliveries.

Impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver for the perineal protection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver on the incidence of perineal tears in spontaneous term deliveries. METHODS: A comparative, retrospective, mono-centric study in a university maternity unit was designed and included all primiparous women who delivered spontaneously after 37 weeks of gestation in cephalic presentation. Two cohorts were studied, before and after the practice of Couder's maneuver. In the first cohort, the ''OSE cohort'' only selective episiotomies were performed from January 2009 to December 2010. In the second cohort, from January 2016 to December 2017, the ''SEC cohort'' selective episiotomies combined with Couder's maneuver were performed by midwives and obstetricians. The primary outcome was the type of perineal tears, according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) classification. RESULTS: A total of 2081 patients were included: 909 patients in the OSE cohort and 1172 patients in the SEC cohort. Couder's maneuver was performed in 59% of the SEC cohort. In the SEC cohort, there were an increase in the number of intact perinea (55% versus 63%, p < 0.001), a decrease in second-degree perineal tears (18% versus 11%, p < 0.001) and a decrease in labia minora tears (48% versus 37%, p < 0.001). The rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries was less than 1% in both cohorts (0.3% versus 0.5%, p = 0.7). CONCLUSION: A selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver could reduce the incidence of perineal tears, particularly second-degree perineal tears, without increasing the rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

Mediolateral Episiotomy: Technique, Practice, and Training.

Episiotomy is one of the most common obstetric procedures. However, restrictive use of episiotomy has led to a decrease in its use in the United States. Historically, mediolateral episiotomy has been performed less often than median episiotomy in the United States, but both have purported advantages and disadvantages. Emerging research on episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injuries has led to an examination of the effects of mediolateral episiotomy. This article describes performance of a mediolateral episiotomy in a situation of fetal bradycardia. Technical aspects of the incision and repair are described, and outcome data and knowledge gaps are summarized. Implications for practice, clinical competency, and education are reviewed.

Secondary sphincter repair for anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter injury: functional outcome and quality of life at 18 years of follow-up.

AIM: Secondary sphincter repair has been the conventional management of anal incontinence (AI) when a structural defect in the sphincter is recognized. However, disappointing long-term results have contributed to a tendency towards an increasing use of alternative treatment methods. This study aimed to assess the long-term functional outcomes following a secondary sphincter repair in women with AI after obstetric sphincter injury. METHOD: This is a questionnaire study of women who underwent a secondary sphincter repair in Denmark between January 1990 and December 2005. Patients were identified through the Danish National Patient Registry. Functional outcomes were assessed by a self-administered questionnaire in 2010 and 2018. Primary outcomes were Wexner and St. Mark's scores. Impact on quality of life was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: Functional outcome was assessed in 370 women in 2010 and 255 women in 2018. At 18.3 [interquartile range (IQR 15.0-22.0)] years of follow-up, the mean ± SD Wexner score was 8.8 ± 4.8 and the mean St. Mark's score was 11.7 ± 5.0. Flatus incontinence was the most frequent symptom, reported by 97%. Incontinence for liquid and solid stools was reported by 75% and 54%, respectively. There were no significant changes in incontinence frequencies over time. Women with a Wexner score of ≥ 9 had a significantly lower quality of life score in all domains than did women with a Wexner score of < 9 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: At long-term follow-up, few patients are fully continent following a secondary sphincter repair. However, it appears that the functional results remain stable at very long-term follow-up.

Combination of laser and human adipose-derived stem cells in repair of rabbit anal sphincter injury: a new therapeutic approach.

BACKGROUND: Anal sphincter injury leads to fecal incontinence. Based on the regenerative capability of laser and human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs), this study was designed to assess the effects of co-application of these therapies on anal sphincter recovery after injury. DESIGN: Male rabbits were assigned to equal groups (n = 7) including control, sphincterotomy, sphincterotomy treated with laser (660 nm, 90 s, immediately after sphincterotomy, daily, 14 days), hADSCs (2 × 106 hADSCs injected into injured area of the sphincter immediately after sphincterotomy), and laser + hADSCs. Ninety days after sphincterotomy, manometry and electromyography were performed, sphincter collagen content was evaluated, and Ki67, myosin heavy chain (MHC), skeletal muscle alpha-actin (ACTA1), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and vimentin mRNA gene expression were assessed. RESULTS: The laser + hADSCs group had a higher resting pressure compared with the sphincterotomy (p < 0.0001), laser (p < 0.0001), and hADSCs (p = 0.04) groups. Maximum squeeze pressure was improved in all treated animals compared with the sphincterotomized animals (p < 0.0001), without a significant difference between treatments (p > 0.05). In the laser + hADSCs group, motor unit numbers were higher than those in the laser group (p < 0.0001) but did not differ from the hADSCs group (p = 0.075). Sphincterotomy increased collagen content, but the muscle content (p = 0.36) and collagen content (p = 0.37) were not significantly different between the laser + hADSCs and control groups. Laser + hADSCs increased ACTA1 (p = 0.001) and MHC (p < 0.0001) gene expression compared with laser or hADSCs alone and was associated with increased VEGFA (p = 0.009) and Ki67 mRNA expression (p = 0.01) and decreased vimentin mRNA expression (p < 0.0001) compared with laser. CONCLUSION: The combination of laser and hADSCs appears more effective than either treatment alone for promoting myogenesis, angiogenesis, and functional recovery after anal sphincterotomy.

'Hands-off/poised' or 'Hands-on' method among Chinese midwives: A cross-sectional survey.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine midwives' preference for "Hands-on" and "Hands-off/poised" methods and to explore the impact factors. BACKGROUND: With the increasing rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, great controversy surrounds the "Hands-on" or "Hands-off" method during childbirth to decrease obstetric anal sphincter injuries incidence. Without regular records and related research, determining the use of this technique in China is difficult. DESIGN: This study used a quantitative study design, following the EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE). METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional online survey was conducted using respondent-driven sampling across 31 provinces in China from 1st October 2017-31st December 2017. A total of 6,425 midwives were involved. Descriptive analyses, chi-square test and binary logistic regression were undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 5,225 questionnaires were returned; 55.8% of the participants preferred the "Hands-off/poised" method. The impact factors included hospital categories, total work experience in a birth unit in years, theoretical education and skill training. In the study, for situations with increased OASI risk, 100% of the midwives in the "Hands-off" group expressed willingness to change to the "Hands-on" method whether there was concern about impending obstetric anal sphincter injuries. CONCLUSION: The "Hands-off/poised" method is heavily practised by Chinese midwives. However, majority of the midwives adopt "Hands-on" method in the face of high risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Further studies are needed to determine the association between obstetric anal sphincter injuries rate and perineal management for low-risk birth. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The result indirectly illustrates the application of "Hands-off/poised" technique in China and provides evidence for the international midwifery organisation to understand the status of Chinese midwifery to some extent. It also provides the latest data for further study of these two methods and the study of the relationship between hands-off/poised method and obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection: feasibility and technical aspects.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal colostomy has been reported as an option with good quality of life for patients requiring abdominoperineal resection (APR) for very low rectal cancer. Some young, compliant patients, nevertheless, are very motivated to avoid abdominal colostomy following APR. Spiral smooth muscle cuff perineal colostomy as neosphincter reconstruction can be a reasonable alternative. We have published before the results of a series of sphincter reconstruction in the conventional technique following APR. As we developed our technique for colorectal resection sphincter reconstruction, we also changed to a laparoscopic approach. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic neosphincteric reconstruction and outline the aspects of the technique. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 15 patients treated at our institution during a 6 year period for low rectal cancer by laparoscopic APR and spiral smooth muscle cuff perineal colostomy as sphincter reconstruction. At follow-up at a median time of 3.7 years (range 3-9 years) after surgery, patients underwent functional evaluation which included the modified Holschneider continence score (0-16), assessing consistency of stool, frequency, impulse, discrimination, warning period, incontinence for formed or fluid feces, soiling, wearing pads, drugs, enema where a score of 13-16 is associated with normal continence, as well as neosphincter manometry. RESULTS: Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction was feasible in all 15 patients. Two of the fifteen patients (13%) required secondary colostomy in the long term due to neosphincter malfunction and neosphincter perforation after enema. Four of the remaining thirteen patients (30%) were partially continent according to the Holschneider continence score (HCS) with a score of 7-12. The other 9 (70%) were continent (HCS: 13-16). Neosphincter manometry showed a median resting pressure of 33 cm H2O (range 30-41 cm H2O) and a median squeeze pressure of 95 cm H2O (range 84-150 cm H2O). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sphincter reconstruction following APR is a feasible option offering an alternative to abdominal colostomy for selected patients.

Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are associated with anal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain. Bimanual perineal support technique (bPST) prevents OASIS. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of two different bPST training-methods on OASIS incidence. METHODS: This is a prospective-interventional quality improvement study conducted in two Palestinian maternity units between June 1 2015 and December 31 2016. Women having spontaneous or operative vaginal-delivery at ≥24 gestational-weeks or a birthweight of ≥1000 g (n = 1694) were recruited and examined vaginally and rectally immediately after vaginal birth by a trained assessor. Data on baseline OASIS incidence were collected during Phase-1 of the study. Subsequently, birth attendants in both maternity units were trained in bPST using two training modalities. A self-directed electronic-learning (e-learning) using an animated video was launched in phase-2 followed by a blended learning method (the animated e-learning video+ structured face-to-face training) in phase-3. OASIS incidence was monitored during phases-2 and 3. Variations in OASIS incidence between the three phases were assessed using Pearson-χ2-test (or Fisher's-Exact-test). The impact of each training-method on OASIS incidence was assessed using logistic-regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1694 women were included; 376 in phase-1, 626 in phase-2 and 692 in phase-3. Compared to Phase-1, OASIS incidence was reduced by 45% (12.2 to 6.7%, aOR: 0.56, CI; 0.35-0.91, p = 0.018) and 74% (12.2 to 3.2%, aOR, 0.29, CI; 0.17-0.50, p < 0.001) in phases-2 and 3, respectively. There was also a significant reduction in OASIS incidence by 52% from phase-2 to phase-3 (6.7% (42/626) to 3.2% (22/692), p = 0.003). These reductions reached statistical significance among parous-women only (aOR: 0.18, CI; 0.07-0.49, p = 0.001) after the first training method tested in phase-2. However, the reduction was significant among both primiparous (aOR: 0.39, CI; 0.21-0.74, p = 0.004) and parous-women (aOR: 0.11, CI; 0.04-0.32, p < 0.001) after implementing the blended learning method in phase-3. CONCLUSION: The animated e-learning video had a positive impact on reducing OASIS incidence. However, this reduction was enhanced by the use of a blended learning program combining both e- learning and face-to-face training modalities. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrialo.gov identifier: NCT02427854 , date: 28 April 2015.

Grade III and IV perineal tears: risk factors and clinical progress / Desgarros perineales de III y IV grado. Factores de riesgo y evolución clínica

Objective: To study the prevalence of risk factors associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury and its development in the short term. Material and methods: Observational retrospective study of grade III and IV tears over a period of 3 years. We evaluated maternal risk factors and factors related to childbirth. We also followed patients during the first year after delivery. Results: The incidence of anal sphincter tears was 2.03% (62.6% type IIIA). The principal modifiable risk factors were instrumental delivery (61%), with a relative risk of laceration of 9.1% for forceps, 4.4% for vacuum extraction, and 3.6% for spatulas, compared with 0.86% for normal deliveries. Prolonged labor (more than 3 hours) was recorded in nearly 50% of patients. The main nonmodifiable risk factor was primiparity (85.1% of cases). At the first check-up, 63.9% of patients were asymptomatic; at the second, 92.7% were asymptomatic, and perineal tone had improved. Conclusion: Health professionals must be trained to assess risk factors for perineal tears, as well as to make a correct diagnosis and provide appropriate treatment. Patients should be followed up and receive instructions on pelvic floor muscle exercises

Objetivo: estudiar la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo relacionados con los desgarros del esfínter anal y su evolución clínica a corto plazo. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo observacional de desgarros de III y IV grado durante 3 años. Hemos valorado factores de riesgo maternos y aquellos relacionados con el parto. Además hemos seguido a las pacientes durante el primer año postparto. Resultados: la incidencia de desgarros del esfínter anal ha sido del 2,03%, siendo el 62,6% de tipo IIIA. Como factores de riesgo modificables han destacado el parto instrumental (61%); con un riesgo relativo de desgarro para el fórceps del 9,1%, del 4,4% para las ventosas y del 3,6% para las espátulas, frente al 0,86% para los partos eutócicos. El expulsivo prolongado de más de 3 horas se ha dado en casi el 50% de pacientes. Dentro de los no modificables observamos la primiparidad en el 85,1% de casos. En el primer control clínico el 63,9% de las pacientes están asintomáticas y en el segundo el 92,7%, objetivando también una mejoría del tono perineal. Conclusión: la formación de los profesionales es fundamental para valorar los factores de riesgo y el correcto diagnóstico y tratamiento de estas lesiones. Además es importante realizar un control evolutivo de estas pacientes y enseñarles a ejercitar la musculatura pélvica

Implementation of a perineal support programme for reduction of the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and the effect of non-compliance.

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a serious complication of a vaginal delivery. In 2005, a Norwegian nation-wide training programme to reduce the OASI rate was successfully implemented. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of a perineal support programme, inspired by the Norwegian programme, on the incidence of OASIs in a Dutch hospital with a low a priori rate. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with historical comparison group. Three midwives and one obstetrician were trained on site by an expert midwife from Norway. These four trained the rest of the obstetrical staff. Data were prospectively recorded using the Dutch National Perinatal Registry, with additional recording whether the manual perineal support was actually applied in individual deliveries. OASI rates in three time periods were studied: the year preceding the training programme, the training period of 7 months and the year after the training period (respectively "control period", "training period" and "result period"). After exclusion of caesarean sections, preterm deliveries, breech and twin deliveries, a total of 4391 deliveries were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: During the training period, the OASI rate decreased significantly from 2.0 to 0.7% (aOR 0.34; 95%CI 0.15-0.76). In the result period, manual perineal support was performed in 72.7% of the deliveries and the overall OASI rate raised to 1.7% again, mainly because of non-compliance to the programme during vacuum deliveries. Nevertheless, multivariate logistic regression analysis with correction for known OASI risk factors showed that the OASI rate was 83% lower with application of perineal support (aOR 0.17; 95%CI 0.07-0.39). CONCLUSION: A perineal support programme decreases OASI rate. Continuous verification of application and repetitive training is necessary, especially during vacuum deliveries.

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) are a major risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI). Neuromodulation is often used as second-line therapy for FI, but evidence for its efficacy is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and predictive factors of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for obstetric anal sphincter injury-induced FI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive females with FI related to past OASI who had not responded to first-line therapy and had received 8-12 weeks of posterior tibial nerve stimulation were included. Subjects aged more than 50 and/or having other causes of FI were excluded. Patients underwent anorectal physiology and endoanal ultrasound pretherapy. Symptom burden was evaluated pretherapy and posttherapy using Rockwood and Wexner scales. A Wexner score reduced to below 10 or halved was used to define responders. RESULTS: A total of 37 females (mean age 38 years, median parity 2) were included. About 17 (46%) had ultrasonographically visualized anal sphincter defects and 41% had a history of third or second-degree perineal tears. About 14 subjects (38%) were deemed responders. Compared with nonresponders, responders had lower baseline rectal distension thresholds and tended to have disrupted (59%) than intact sphincters (20%, p < 0.01). Responders demonstrated improvement in Rockwood score for depression and embarrassment, visual analogue score for bowel symptoms and stool consistency (median baseline Bristol score 5, to 3 posttherapy; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Of a well-defined cohort of females with FI secondary to OASI, 38% responded to posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Much of this improvement may relate to improvement in stool consistency.

Enhancing recognition of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in six maternity units in Palestine: an interventional quality improvement study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of a training intervention on obstetric anal sphincter injuries' (OASIS) detection rate. DESIGN: Prospective quality improvement interventional study. SETTING: Six secondary and tertiary maternity units in Palestine. POPULATION: Women having singleton vaginal births ≥23 weeks' gestation or babies weighing ≥500 g (n=22 922). Caesarean births (n=5431), multiple gestations (n=443) and vaginal births of unregistered perineum status (n=800) were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Training programme for enhancing OASIS detection was conducted between 31 January and 31 December 2015. International experts delivered 2-day standardisation workshop teaching OASIS diagnosis and repair to each maternity unit. They also provided additional training to three research fellows employed in three of the maternity units. This was followed by 13-week period of data collection (phase 1). Research fellows then delivered training intervention over 15-week interval (phase 2), including theoretical teaching and 'onsite' training in perineal trauma assessment within the six maternity units. Finally, 13-week postintervention observation (phase 3) followed. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: OASIS rates were used as surrogate for OASIS recognition. OASIS rates were compared between different phases and between the two maternity unit groups (research fellow and non-research fellow based) using Pearson's χ² test. RESULTS: A total 22 922 women were included. Among primiparous women, OASIS rate was higher in phase 2 (2.8%, p<0.001) and phase 3 (3.1%, p<0.001) than phase 1 (0.5%). However, no significant differences were detected in the rates of severe OASIS (third-degree 3c and fourth-degree tears) between phase 1 and 2 (0.5% vs 0.3%), because this would have required at least 103 women with severe OASIS to be included in each phase. Among parous women, OASIS rate was significantly higher in phase 2 (0.6%, p=0.002) but not in phase 3 (0.4%, p=0.071) compared with phase 1 (0.2%). Research fellows' maternity units showed higher OASIS rates among primiparous women in phase 2 (3.6% vs 1.4%, p=0.001) and phase 3 (4.3% vs 0.8%, p<0.001) than non-research fellows' maternity units. CONCLUSIONS: This work is basically an epidemiological study which has identified the prevalence of perineal lacerations and their severity on a large sample of women representative of an entire geographical ethnic region. The quality improvement intervention improved OASIS detection mainly in the research fellows' maternity units. Regular mandatory national programmes in obstetric perineal trauma assessment and management by local champions are essential to mitigate the risk of missing significant degrees of trauma.

Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate episiotomy technique, in particular suture angles, and any correlation between suture angle and severe perineal tears. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational questionnaire-based study was conducted between 01 August 2015 and 30 April 2016 among accoucheurs performing episiotomies in a French maternity unit with facilities for high-risk pregnancies. For each patient included, accoucheurs were asked to measure the episiotomy suture angle, and to record the angle at which they thought they had cut, the length of the episiotomy, its distance from the anus, and whether the woman sustained a sphincter injury. RESULTS: The centre's episiotomy rate during the study period was 15%. We analyzed the characteristics of episiotomies performed on 89 women (68 by doctors and 21 by midwives). Only 43% of suture angles were between 45° and 60° (45.6% of those performed by doctors vs 38.1% by midwives, p=0.8623), whereas 91% of accoucheurs thought they had cut within the correct range. Doctors made longer incisions than midwives (4 [4.2-5.0] vs 3 [2.5-3.5] cm, p=0.0006). Only 40.5% of accoucheurs correctly estimated the incision angle. Twelve (13.64%) of the 88 women sustained a third-degree perineal tear. The risk of sphincter injury was higher with suture angles <45° (odds ratio 5.46 [1.11-26.75], p=0.037). After multivariate analysis, this result was no longer significant (p=0.079). CONCLUSION: It appears that many accoucheurs have difficulty estimating episiotomy incision angles correctly and that education and training in this domain requires improvement.

Implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at two London Hospitals: A time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To audit the impact of implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) by introducing antenatal perineal massage, manual perineal protection, and cutting episiotomies at 60° to the midline at the time of crowning. DESIGN: Time series analysis; Setting - Two London teaching hospitals; Royal Free London (RFL) and Barnet; Population or Sample - All nulliparous women undergoing vaginal birth; Methods - Training was provided for above techniques. EPISCISSORS-60 were introduced to perform 60° episiotomies. Data were extracted from maternity databases and dashboards; Main Outcome Measures - OASIS rates before and after implementation. RESULTS: Data from 2566 births were analysed. In operative vaginal deliveries (OVD), OASIS declined from 9.6% to 2% (p = 0.001) at Barnet and from 5.6% to 4.2% (p = 0.4) at RFL. OASIS reduced in nulliparous OVD's given episiotomies from 6.3% in the 'before' period to 0.6% in the 'after' period [p = 0.01] at Barnet. Before introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60, OASIS rate was 6.3% with episiotomies and 30% without episiotomies (p = 0.000). After introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60, OASIS rate was 0.63% with episiotomies v 16% without episiotomies (p = 0.000) at Barnet. At RFL, OASIS rate was 2.6% with episiotomies, and 42% without episiotomy (p = 0.000). In SVD's at Barnet, OASIS declined from 6.6% before to 0% after (p = 0.000) in women given episiotomies while it declined from 5.4% to 3% (p = 0.12) in those not given episiotomies. After introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60, OASIS was 0% in women with episiotomies and 3% in those without episiotomies (p = 0.04). In SVD's at RFL, OASIS was 0% in women given episiotomy v 4.7% without episiotomy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Deliveries with EPISCISSORS-60 episiotomies had lesser OASIS than those without episiotomies in both nulliparous OVD's and SVD's. OASIS was lower with EPISCISSORS-60 episiotomies than those with eyeballed episiotomies.

Effects of electroacupuncture combined with stem cell transplantation on anal sphincter injury-induced faecal incontinence in a rat model.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and acupuncture are known to mitigate tissue damage. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of combined electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation and BMSC injection in a rat model of anal sphincter injury-induced faecal incontinence (FI). METHODS: 60 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: sham-operated control, FI, FI+EA, FI+BMSC, and FI+BMSC+EA. The anorectal tissues were collected on days 1, 3, 7 and 14. Repair of the injured anal sphincter was compared using haematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunocytochemiscal analyses with sarcomeric α actinin. The expression of stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3) was detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR to evaluate the effects of EA on the homing of BMSCs. RESULTS: The therapeutic effect of combined EA+BMSCs on damaged tissue was the strongest among all the groups as indicated by HE and immunohistochemical staining. The expression of SDF-1 and MCP-3 was significantly increased by combined EA and BMSC treatment when compared with the other groups (P=0.01 to P<0.05), suggesting promotive effects of EA on the homing of BMSCs. CONCLUSION: The combination of EA and BMSC transplantation effectively repaired the impaired anal sphincters. The underlying mechanism might be associated with apparent promotive effects of EA on the homing of BMSCs. Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of a non-surgical treatment method for FI secondary to muscle impairment.

Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries After Training to Protect the Perineum.

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASISs) are a devastating postpartum complication; reducing rates is paramount to improving quality of care. In Norway, implementation of a perineal protection program decreased the incidence of OASIS by 48%. We sought to assess impact on OASIS rates following a similar program. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study was performed in an academic hospital system. The periods of analysis were November 2014 through October 2015 for the preintervention arm and November 2015 through October 2016 for the postintervention arm. From November 2 to 6, 2015, 2 Norwegian experts conducted a didactic and hands-on, on-site workshop focusing on perineal protection. The experts were then present on labor and delivery wards to reinforce perineal protection in live deliveries. Teachings were emphasized at departmental meetings for the remainder of the year. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and manually audited. RESULTS: The rate of vaginal delivery was similar among both periods (6504 and 6650; P = 0.059). Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates decreased from 211 (3.2%) preintervention to 189 (2.8%) after the workshop. Although this represented 32 fewer injuries, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.179). Obstetric anal sphincter injuries following forceps-assisted deliveries did decline significantly from 103 (28%) to 81 (21%) (P = 0.014). In addition, incidence of fourth-degree lacerations during resident deliveries decreased significantly from 10 (0.6%) to 3 (0.2%) (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An educational workshop focusing on perineal support was not associated with a significant reduction in overall OASIS rates. Nevertheless, decreased forceps-related OASIS and fourth-degree lacerations rates support positive influence of the intervention.

Interventional program to reduce both the incidence of anal sphincter tears and rate of Caesarean sections.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the ability of an intensive interventional program to decrease the number of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), while simultaneously decreasing the rate of Caesarean sections (CS). STUDY DESIGN: The intervention, which aimed at decreasing the number of OASIS, started with a compulsory tutorial for all the midwives and physicians. At the same time, the clinic initiated a program to decrease the number of CS. We compared the outcomes before and after the intervention by calculating the risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The changes in selected outcomes were also tested using the test of relative proportions. The follow-up was extended for 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS: The number of deliveries by CS decreased significantly, as did the number of OASIS in all the subgroups, except for the multi-parous women. The rate of OASIS for instrumental deliveries (mostly by vacuum) decreased significantly (p < 0.003), as compared to pre-interventional period. The number of Grade 4 tears decreased significantly: from 0.4 ruptures per 100 deliveries before the start of the intervention to 0.1 ruptures after the start of the intervention (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.98, p = 0.037). However, the OASIS and Grade 4 sphincter injuries increased with forceps delivery. The CS rate decreased from 17.7 to 15.0 per 100 deliveries (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93). The post-interventional follow-up period revealed a further decrease in the frequency of OASIS (to 1.28%, p < 0.001) and a stable CS rate (14.2%). CONCLUSION: The intervention significantly decreases the frequency of OASIS, in line with the results obtained for earlier interventions. At the same time, a decrease in CS rate was obtained.

Sacral neuromodulation for combined faecal and urinary incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in the treatment of faecal incontinence and concomitant urinary incontinence in women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). METHOD: In this prospective study, consecutive women with faecal incontinence following OASIS accepted for SNM were screened for concomitant urinary incontinence. The primary outcome was the change in urinary incontinence score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence, Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), between baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the change in St Mark's score, sexual function and quality of life, change in grade of urinary incontinence and disappearance of urgency. RESULTS: From March 2012 to September 2014, 39 women with combined faecal incontinence and urinary incontinence received SNM. Thirty-seven women were available for analysis after 12 months. The mean reduction in the ICIQ-UI-SF score between the baseline and 12 months was 5.8 (95% CI 3.7-8.0, P < 0.001). ICIQ-UI-SF was reduced in 29 (78%) women, urinary incontinence resolved in 13/37 (35%, 95% CI 20%-50%) patients, and urgency disappeared in 14/33 (42%, 95% CI 26%-59%). The mean reduction in the St Mark's score was 10.6 (95% CI 8.6-12.7, P < 0.001). Disease-specific quality of life, Euroqual 5-dimension visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) and several areas of sexual function changed significantly for the better. CONCLUSION: More than three-quarters of the women with combined faecal and urinary incontinence following OASIS reported a successful outcome with reduction in ICIQ-UI-SF at 12 months after SNM.

Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Most vaginal births are associated with trauma to the genital tract. The morbidity associated with perineal trauma can be significant, especially when it comes to third- and fourth-degree tears. Different interventions including perineal massage, warm or cold compresses, and perineal management techniques have been used to prevent trauma. This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in 2011. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of perineal techniques during the second stage of labour on the incidence and morbidity associated with perineal trauma. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (26 September 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating perineal techniques during the second stage of labour. Cross-over trials were not eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. We checked data for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two trials were eligible for inclusion (with 20 trials involving 15,181 women providing data). Overall, trials were at moderate to high risk of bias; none had adequate blinding, and most were unclear for both allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data. Interventions compared included the use of perineal massage, warm and cold compresses, and other perineal management techniques.Most studies did not report data on our secondary outcomes. We downgraded evidence for risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision for all comparisons. Hands off (or poised) compared to hands onHands on or hands off the perineum made no clear difference in incidence of intact perineum (average risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.12, two studies, Tau² 0.00, I² 37%, 6547 women; moderate-quality evidence), first-degree perineal tears (average RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.77, two studies, 700 women; low-quality evidence), second-degree tears (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.28, two studies, 700 women; low-quality evidence), or third- or fourth-degree tears (average RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.26, five studies, Tau² 0.92, I² 72%, 7317 women; very low-quality evidence). Substantial heterogeneity for third- or fourth-degree tears means these data should be interpreted with caution. Episiotomy was more frequent in the hands-on group (average RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.79, Tau² 0.07, I² 74%, four studies, 7247 women; low-quality evidence), but there was considerable heterogeneity between the four included studies.There were no data for perineal trauma requiring suturing. Warm compresses versus control (hands off or no warm compress)A warm compress did not have any clear effect on the incidence of intact perineum (average RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.21; 1799 women; four studies; moderate-quality evidence), perineal trauma requiring suturing (average RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.66; 76 women; one study; very low-quality evidence), second-degree tears (average RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.56; 274 women; two studies; very low-quality evidence), or episiotomy (average RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.23; 1799 women; four studies; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether warm compress increases or reduces the incidence of first-degree tears (average RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.79; 274 women; two studies; I² 88%; very low-quality evidence).Fewer third- or fourth-degree perineal tears were reported in the warm-compress group (average RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79; 1799 women; four studies; moderate-quality evidence). Massage versus control (hands off or routine care)The incidence of intact perineum was increased in the perineal-massage group (average RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.73, six studies, 2618 women; I² 83% low-quality evidence) but there was substantial heterogeneity between studies). This group experienced fewer third- or fourth-degree tears (average RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.94, five studies, 2477 women; moderate-quality evidence).There were no clear differences between groups for perineal trauma requiring suturing (average RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61, one study, 76 women; very low-quality evidence), first-degree tears (average RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.79 to 3.05, five studies, Tau² 0.47, I² 85%, 537 women; very low-quality evidence), or second-degree tears (average RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.12, five studies, Tau² 0.32, I² 62%, 537 women; very low-quality evidence). Perineal massage may reduce episiotomy although there was considerable uncertainty around the effect estimate (average RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.03, seven studies, Tau² 0.43, I² 92%, 2684 women; very low-quality evidence). Heterogeneity was high for first-degree tear, second-degree tear and for episiotomy - these data should be interpreted with caution. Ritgen's manoeuvre versus standard careOne study (66 women) found that women receiving Ritgen's manoeuvre were less likely to have a first-degree tear (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.69; very low-quality evidence), more likely to have a second-degree tear (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.73 to 6.09; very low-quality evidence), and neither more nor less likely to have an intact perineum (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.31; very low-quality evidence). One larger study reported that Ritgen's manoeuvre did not have an effect on incidence of third- or fourth-degree tears (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.96,1423 women; low-quality evidence). Episiotomy was not clearly different between groups (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03, two studies, 1489 women; low-quality evidence). Other comparisonsThe delivery of posterior versus anterior shoulder first, use of a perineal protection device, different oils/wax, and cold compresses did not show any effects on perineal outcomes. Only one study contributed to each of these comparisons, so data were insufficient to draw conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-quality evidence suggests that warm compresses, and massage, may reduce third- and fourth-degree tears but the impact of these techniques on other outcomes was unclear or inconsistent. Poor-quality evidence suggests hands-off techniques may reduce episiotomy, but this technique had no clear impact on other outcomes. There were insufficient data to show whether other perineal techniques result in improved outcomes.Further research could be performed evaluating perineal techniques, warm compresses and massage, and how different types of oil used during massage affect women and their babies. It is important for any future research to collect information on women's views.