Diurnal Changes in Capecitabine Clock-Controlled Metabolism Enzymes Are Responsible for Its Pharmacokinetics in Male Mice.

The circadian timing system controls absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination processes of drug pharmacokinetics over a 24-h period. Exposure of target tissues to the active form of the drug and cytotoxicity display variations depending on the chronopharmacokinetics. For anticancer drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges and dose-limiting side effects, it is particularly important to know the temporal changes in pharmacokinetics. A previous study indicated that pharmacokinetic profile of capecitabine was different depending on dosing time in rat. However, it is not known how such difference is attributed with respect to diurnal rhythm. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated capecitabine-metabolizing enzymes in a diurnal rhythm-dependent manner. To this end, C57BL/6J male mice were orally treated with 500 mg/kg capecitabine at ZT1, ZT7, ZT13, or ZT19. We then determined pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'DFUR), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in plasma and liver. Results revealed that plasma Cmax and AUC0-6h (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h) values of capecitabine, 5'DFUR, and 5-FU were higher during the rest phase (ZT1 and ZT7) than the activity phase (ZT13 and ZT19) (p < 0.05). Similarly, Cmax and AUC0-6h values of 5'DFUR and 5-FU in liver were higher during the rest phase than activity phase (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in liver concentrations of capecitabine and 5'DFCR. We determined the level of the enzymes responsible for the conversion of capecitabine and its metabolites at each ZT. Results indicated the levels of carboxylesterase 1 and 2, cytidine deaminase, uridine phosphorylase 2, and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (p < 0.05) are being rhythmically regulated and, in turn, attributed different pharmacokinetics profiles of capecitabine and its metabolism. This study highlights the importance of capecitabine administration time to increase the efficacy with minimum adverse effects.

A case report of a severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity due to an uncommon DPYD variant.

INTRODUCTION: Fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its orally active prodrug, capecitabine, are widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer, including colorectal cancer. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays an important role in the 5-FU metabolism. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) is a highly polymorphic gene with several hundreds of reported genetic variants and DPD activity levels vary considerably among individuals, with different 5-FU-related efficacy and toxicity. About 5% of the population is deficient in DPD enzyme activity. The most well studied DPYD variant is the IVS14+1G>A, also known as DPYD *2A. In this report, we present a case of a patient with a double heterozygote DPYD variant (DPYD activity score: 0,5 according to Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) who experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity resolved without any consequence. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 46-years-old Caucasian man with diagnosis of left colon adenocarcinoma underwent left hemicolectomy on July 2017: pT3 G3 N1c M0. According to the disease stage, he started an adjuvant therapy with XELOX using capecitabine at 50% of total dose, because of his DPYD IVS14+1G>A variant, detected before the treatment. DIAGNOSIS: After few days, despite of this dose reduction, he experienced life-threatening adverse events such as mucositis G3, diarrhea G3, neutropenia G4, thrombocytopenia G4, and hyperbilirubinemia G3 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. INTERVENTIONS: As first, we set up an intensive rehydration therapy, antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors, and supportive blood transfusions. Additional genetic tests revealed a double heterozygote variant of DPYD gene (DPYD IVS14+1G>A and 2846A>T) which is a very rare situation and only 3 cases are described in literature, all of them concluded with patient's death. OUTCOMES: After 3 weeks of intensive therapy, the patient was fully recovered. Furthermore, all the whole-body CT scans performed since discharge from the hospital until now, have confirmed no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Recent studies demonstrated that screening strategy for the most common DPYD variants allowed for avoiding toxicities and saving money. This report underlines the importance of genotyping DPYD before treatment and emphasizes the role of genotype-guided dose individualization.

Rabeprazole intake does not affect systemic exposure to capecitabine and its metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: Several retrospective studies have shown that the antitumor efficacy of capecitabine-containing chemotherapy decreases when co-administered with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Although a reduction in capecitabine absorption by PPIs was proposed as the underlying mechanism, the effects of PPIs on capecitabine pharmacokinetics remain unclear. We prospectively examined the effects of rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites. METHODS: We enrolled patients administered adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) for postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and metastatic CRC patients receiving CapeOX with/without bevacizumab. Patients receiving a PPI before registration were allocated to the rabeprazole group, and the PPI was changed to rabeprazole (20 mg/day) at least 1 week before the initiation of capecitabine treatment. On day 1, oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered 1 h after rabeprazole intake. Oxaliplatin (and bevacizumab) administration on day 1 was shifted to day 2 for pharmacokinetic analysis of the first capecitabine dose. Plasma concentrations of capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, and 5-fluorouracil were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Effects of rabeprazole on inhibition of cell proliferation by each capecitabine metabolite were examined with colon cancer cells (COLO205 and HCT116). RESULTS: Five and 9 patients enrolled between September 2017 and July 2018 were allocated to rabeprazole and control groups, respectively. No significant effects of rabeprazole on area under the plasma concentration-time curve divided by capecitabine dose for capecitabine and its three metabolites were observed. Rabeprazole did not affect the proliferation inhibition of colon cancer cells by the respective capecitabine metabolites. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole does not affect capecitabine pharmacokinetics.

Assessment of metabolism-dependent drug efficacy and toxicity on a multilayer organs-on-a-chip.

Pharmaceutical development is greatly hindered by the poor predictive power of existing in vitro models for drug efficacy and toxicity testing. In this work, we present a new and multilayer organs-on-a-chip device that allows for the assessment of drug metabolism, and its resultant drug efficacy and cytotoxicity in different organ-specific cells simultaneously. Four cell lines representing the liver, tumor (breast cancer and lung cancer), and normal tissue (gastric cells) were cultured in the compartmentalized micro-chambers of the multilayer microdevice. We adopted the prodrug capecitabine (CAP) as a model drug. The intermediate metabolites 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (DFUR) of CAP that were metabolized from liver and its active metabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) from the targeted cancer cells and normal tissue cells were identified using mass spectrometry. CAP exhibited strong cytoxicity on breast cancer and lung cancer cells, but not in normal gastric cells. Moreover, the drug-induced cytotoxicity on cells varied in various target tissues, suggesting the metabolism-dependent drug efficacy in different tissues as exisits in vivo. This in vitro model can not only allow for characterizing the dynamic metabolism of anti-cancer drugs in different tissues simultaneously, but also facilitate the assessment of drug bioactivity on various target tissues in a simple way, indicating the utility of this organs-on-chip for applications in pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics studies, drug efficacy and toxicity testing.