Financial Implication of Radioactive Iodine Therapy for Early-Stage Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate disease-specific survival and cost related to radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) utilization in patients with early-stage papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2004-2012. RESULTS: A total of 38,374 patients with PTC were identified. Of those, 56.3% had adjuvant RAI. RAI administration was not associated with a survival advantage in patients with PTC stage I (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11, 14.54; p = 0.85) or stage II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05, 4.88; p = 0.55). Patients with PTC stage III who underwent adjuvant RAI had an improved survival (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10, 0.91; p = 0.033). In 2012, RAI was used in 45.5% of patients with stage I and in 71.4% of patients with stage II. The total expenditure on adjuvant RAI for PTC stage I throughout the study period was estimated to be USD 82.3 million with an annual average of USD 9.1 (±2.0) million/year. If the decline rate in the utilization of RAI continued, the model projected that the annual expenditure would decrease by USD 0.14 million/year. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of adjuvant RAI utilization for early-stage PTC that is causing financial burden on the health system with no evidence of survival benefit.

Peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: cost analysis and sustainability.

BACKGROUND: Malignancies of the peritoneum remain a challenge in any hospital that accepts to manage them, due not only to difficulties associated with the complexity of the procedures involved but also the costs, which - in Italy and other countries that use a diagnosis-related group (DRG) system - are not adequately reimbursed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed data relative to 24 patients operated on between September 2010 and May 2013 with special regard to operating room expenditure, ICU stay, duration of hospitalization, and DRG reimbursement. The total costs per patient included clinical, operating room, procedure, pathology, imaging, ward care, allied healthcare, pharmaceutical, and ICU costs. RESULTS: Postoperative hospital stay, drugs and materials, and operating room occupancy were the main factors affecting the expenditure for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We had a median hospitalization of 14 days, median ICU stay of 2.4 days, and median operating room occupancy of 585 min. The median expenditure for each case was € 21,744; the median reimbursement by the national health system € 8,375. CONCLUSIONS: In a DRG reimbursement system, the economic effort in the management of patients undergoing peritonectomy procedures may not be counterbalanced by adequate reimbursement. Joint efforts between medical and administration parties are mandatory to develop appropriate treatment protocols and keep down the costs.

Routine prophylactic central neck dissection for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer is not cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: The role of routine prophylactic central neck dissection (CND) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of the addition of routine CND in patients with low-risk PTC compared with total thyroidectomy (TT) alone. METHODS: A Markov model for low-risk PTC was constructed with a treatment algorithm based on the American Thyroid Association guidelines for well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Utilities and outcome probabilities were derived from published medical literature. US 2010 costs were examined from a society perspective using Medicare reimbursement rates and opportunity loss based on published US government data. Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis were used to examine the uncertainty of probability, cost and utility estimates. RESULTS: Initial TT alone is more cost-effective than TT with CND, resulting in a cost savings of US $5763 per patient with slightly higher effectiveness per patient (0·03 QALY) for a cost savings of $285 per QALY. Sensitivity analysis shows that TT alone offers no advantage when radioactive iodine (RAI) becomes more detrimental to a patient's state of health, when the incidence of non-neck recurrence increases above 5% in patients undergoing TT alone or decreases below 3·9% in patients undergoing TT with CND or when the rate of permanent hypocalcaemia rises above 4%. CONCLUSIONS: TT with CND is not a cost-effective strategy in low-risk PTC. Initial TT alone is favourable because of the low complication rates and low recurrence rates associated with the initial surgery. Alternative strategies such as unilateral prophylactic neck dissection require additional study to assess their cost-effectiveness.

Cost effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced operable head and neck cancer followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy: a Markov model-based decision analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck carcinomas are among the most frequent tumor diseases and, because of different multimodal therapy options, cause enormous costs. For this reason, we examined whether in operable advanced head and neck carcinomas, neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy is cost effective in comparison with surgery followed by postoperative radio(chemo)therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed with paclitaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil as induction therapy. The legal health insurance in Germany was chosen for cost perspectives, and a willingness-to-pay limit at EUR 38,000 was set. RESULTS: Total costs for surgery with postoperative radiochemotherapy amounted to EUR 13,999. Prior induction chemotherapy raised the costs to EUR 17,377, with a higher effectiveness by 0.1 years of life. Costs per year of life gained are EUR 33,780. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) with variations in side effects for surgery and postoperative chemotherapy amounted to between EUR 31,520 and 36,050. With variations in side effects for induction chemotherapy, the ICER amounted to EUR 30,060-37,520. The Monte Carlo simulation disclosed cost effectiveness for 55.4% of the patients; for 44.6%, there was no cost effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The Markov-modeled cost effectiveness analysis indicates that with operable head and neck tumors, induction therapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil is cost effective.

Prevalence, patterns, and costs of Chinese medicine use among prostate cancer patients: a population-based study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) is a comprehensive and universal program, providing Western medicine (WM) and Chinese medicine (CM). This study aims to explore CM use among prostate cancer patients in NHI. METHODS: A cross-section retrospective analysis was conducted using registration and claim data sets from the NHI Research Database. In 2007, 22,352 prostate cancer patients with 265,497 visits of CM and WM ambulatory services were identified. Patient demographics, patterns of therapies, and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2007, 592 prostate cancer patients (2.6%) had 4141 CM outpatient visits (7.0 on average). The median age was 73.9. The majority (90.5%) of CM users also used WM ambulatory services. About one third of CM outpatient services were provided by private clinics. The most frequently used CM therapies were Chinese herbal medication (93.6%), followed by acupuncture/traumatology manipulative therapies (7.0%). CM accounted for 0.2% expenditure ($87,500) and 1.6% visits of ambulatory services. The average cost per visit for WM was 6.3 times higher than that for CM ($133.6 vs $21). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and costs of insurance-covered CM among prostate cancer patients were low. Most prostate cancer patients did not use insurance-covered CM. The majority of CM users also used WM. CM appeared to play a complementary rather than an alternative role.

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (peritonectomy) at the St George Hospital peritoneal surface malignancy program.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are treatment approaches for peritoneal carcinomatosis that has demonstrated improved survival outcomes with acceptable complication rates. This report aims to measure and describe the survival outcomes and health care cost associated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies at a centralized tertiary institution in Australia. METHODS: The expenditure of treatment for 136 consecutive patients who underwent 159 CRS and HIPEC from June 2002 to June 2008 were obtained. Together with their survival outcomes from treatment, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. RESULTS: The average cost of CRS and HIPEC per patient and per life year for appendix cancer is AUD $88,423 (range, AUD $23,933-AUD $299,145) and AUD $37,737/LY; for colorectal cancer is AUD $66,148 (range, AUD $26,079-AUD $409,666) and AUD $29,757/LY; for pseudomyxoma peritonei is AUD $92,308 (range, AUD $11,562-AUD $501,144) and AUD $29,559/LY; for peritoneal mesothelioma is AUD $55,062 (range, AUD $23,261-AUD $94,104) and AUD $20,521/LY; and for other peritoneal surface malignancies is AUD $44,668 (range, AUD $31,592-AUD $70,026) and AUD $22,091/LY. CONCLUSIONS: This complex surgical treatment results in significant increases in medical costs with a parallel increase in survival for a disease that has been poorly treated, and hence may be considered as cost-effective given the observed life years gained.

[Cost of an intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) related to cytoreductive surgery]. / Coûts et financement de la chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale (CHIP) associée à une chirurgie d'exérèse.

BACKGROUND: A complete cytoreductive surgery followed with an intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) is a new treatment allowing curing some patients with a peritoneal carcinomatosis. The cost of this treatment, evaluated in different countries, is high. In France, we do not have any cost evaluation of this therapy, and this state slows its diffusion in our country. The aim of this study is to evaluate the real cost of maximal cytoreductive surgery with IPCH, and to compare it with the financial support given by the Ministery of Health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The real cost of this therapy was established on the standard analytic accountancy of our Institute. The analysis of the financial support received was done after the classification of the patients in the current official diagnosis-related groups, and according to the current rates of reimbursing of these acts. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were treated with IPCH in our Institute during 2002 and 2003. The real mean cost for our hospital was 39,358 euros per patient, with a mean hospital staying of 27.7 days. In counterpart, our hospital received a mean financial support of 20,485 euros, resulting in a deficit of 18,873 euros per patient (and close to 1.4 million of euros for the two years). CONCLUSION: Our current classification of diagnosis-related groups does not allow to describe the real importance of this therapy which combines a maximal cytoreductive surgery with IPCH. In our system of reimbursing, the hospital which offers this type of new therapy to its patients receives only half of the real rate. Two correctives measures are suitable: to describe this combining treatment in the official list of medical acts, and to determine its specific cost for reimbursing.

Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis: phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIIC) combined with cytoreductive surgery (CS) has been proposed as a new multimodal treatment mainly for carcinomatosis of gastrointestinal origin. To evaluate whether this regimen could be used for other tumor types, the authors conducted a Phase I study on HIIC with doxorubicin and cisplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis or sarcomatosis (PCS) were enrolled for the study. After completion of CS, HIIC was administered with drug doses that were increased for each consecutive cohort following a three-patient cohort scheme. Thereafter, the accrual was stopped when Grade 4 locoregional or systemic toxicity was observed. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was considered the dose in the previous triplet. Drug pharmacokinetics and procedure costs also were analyzed. RESULTS: After CS, residual tumors were not present or measured less than or equal to 3 mm (in dimension) in all cases. Maximum tolerated dose was 15.25 and 43.00 mg L(-1) for doxorubicin and cisplatin, respectively. The perfusate/plasma area under the curve ratios were favorable for both drugs, at 162+/-113 and 20.6+/-6.0, respectively, for doxorubicin and cisplatin. Doxorubicin levels in the peritoneum were higher than in tumor or normal tissue samples. There were no postoperative deaths. Surgery-related complications were observed in 25% of cases. Findings at cost analysis showed that the length of stay in the operation room and intensive care unit were the major cost drivers. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery combined with HIIC is an expensive but feasible therapeutic approach for locally advanced abdominal tumors. Because our preliminary findings for local disease control are encouraging, a Phase II study is now advisable to verify the activity of this promising treatment.

A cost-utility approach to the use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' C colonic carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To perform an economic evaluation of the joint use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with fully resected Dukes' Stage C carcinoma of the colon, compared with resection and no chemotherapy. The evaluation was prompted by a study (N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 352-358) which recommended a new treatment standard for colon cancer: a 52-week course of fluorouracil, with levamisole every second week, as adjuvant chemotherapy. This recommendation raised several concerns, particularly about the quality of life of patients undergoing such a long course of chemotherapy and the costs to the health care system. METHODS: The cost of the surgery plus chemotherapy was estimated and compared with the cost of surgery alone. Descriptions of quality of life were developed from interviews with patients and health professionals, and the time trade off technique was then used to derive utility weights from a small sample (16) which were used to adjust length of life to reflect quality, in terms of a "quality adjusted life year" (QALY). RESULTS: Chemotherapy increases the total cost of treating a patient with colon cancer by $7000, from $6000 to $13,000. Incorporating quality of life reduced the extra benefit gained from the chemotherapy from 2.4 life years to 0.4 QALYs. Thus the result is a cost of $17,500 to achieve an extra QALY from this particular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis are only tentative, as the quality of life descriptions were not measured over time but from a cross-sectional survey of patients, and the valuations of health states were derived from a small sample. However, we believe them to be indicative, and conclude that it is perhaps more appropriate for the use of chemotherapy to be an option rather than standard treatment until further research on these aspects is complete.