Mainstreaming Genetic Testing for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Oncology Providers: A Survey of Current Practice.

PURPOSE: With limitations in early detection and poor treatment response, ovarian cancer is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Up to 25% of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is related to a hereditary predisposition. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that all individuals diagnosed with EOC be offered germline genetic testing. Although this would ideally be performed by genetics professionals, a shortage of genetic counselors can affect timely access to these services. This study sought to investigate the current genetic testing practices of oncology providers to determine the feasibility of oncologist-led genetic testing for patients with EOC. METHODS: A survey was distributed to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists with questions regarding timing, frequency, and type of cancer genetic testing, referrals to genetics professionals, confidence with aspects of genetic testing, and any barriers to these processes. RESULTS: We received 170 evaluable responses. Eighty-five percent of providers always ordered genetic testing for patients with EOC. Most providers ordered germline multigene panel testing (95.8%), generally at diagnosis (64.5%). Provider confidence with the genetic testing process was generally high and significantly differed by providers' testing practices, namely, respondents who reported always ordering genetic testing tended to be more confident in ordering testing (P = .008), interpreting results (P = .005), and counseling a patient (P = .002). Patient disinterest and concerns for insurance coverage were commonly cited as barriers to testing and referrals. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study suggest that oncologist-led genetic testing for patients with EOC, with referrals to genetics professionals when appropriate, has the potential to be a viable alternative service delivery model to increase access to genetic testing for patients diagnosed with EOC.

Role of hsa­miR­105 during the pathogenesis of paclitaxel resistance and its clinical implication in ovarian cancer.

More than 70% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), one of the leading cause of gynecological cancer­related deaths worldwide, are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Currently, the mainstay for treatment of advanced EOC is tumor debulking surgery followed by combined platinum­ and paclitaxel (PTX)­based chemotherapy. However, most patients eventually develop chemoresistance, which remains a major obstacle to successful treatment. Herein, by using clinical specimens and experimentally induced cell models, we found that the expression levels of hsa­miR­105 were significantly decreased in PTX­resistant EOC tissues and cell lines. Follow­up functional experiments demonstrated that repression of hsa­miR­105 conferred resistance to paclitaxel in EOC cells, whereas restoration of hsa­miR­105 expression in situ via intratumoral injection of hsa­miR­105 micrON™ agomir potentiated in vivo sensitivity to PTX and thereafter significantly inhibited tumor growth in a PTX­challenged xenograft model. Mechanistically, hsa­miR­105 exerted its tumor suppressor function by directly inhibiting the zinc and ring finger 2 (ZNRF2) signaling pathway. Importantly, aberrant expression of hsa­miR­105 in both tumor and circulating samples predicted a poor post­chemotherapy prognosis in EOC patients. These findings collectively suggest that hsa­miR­105 may act as a potent tumor suppressor miRNA during the progression of EOC, likely affecting cell proliferation, invasiveness and chemosensitivity to PTX, and functioning at least in part via inhibition of ZNRF2 signaling. The stability and availability and ease in measurement of circulating hsa­miR­105 make it a valuable diagnostic/prognostic biomarker candidate for chemotherapy of EOC.

Genetic screening results of individuals with high risk BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer in Trakya region of Turkey.

PURPOSE: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. This study presents the BRCA1/BRCA2 sequencing and deletion duplication analyses results of of 493 participants (485 women, 8 men) selected based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. METHODS: Next generation sequencing (NGS) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification methods (MLPA) were used to define germline BRCA1/BRCA2 positivity. RESULTS: Overall, the P/LP frequency of the participants was 17.8%. Five of the likely pathogenic variants were novel. The 5266dupC pathogenic variation, which is a founder mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, was the most common variation among the patients, with a frequency of 5.47%. The pathogenic/likely pathogenic variation frequency was significantly higher (p=0.01) among clinically diagnosed familial cancer patisents than those participants without personal history of cancer but enrolled for BRCA1 testing due to familial risk. BRCA1/BRCA mutation positivity was significantly higher (p=0.000) among those who had at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast/ovarian cancer from patients who had no family history. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation positivity was 69.23% between the patients who had personal history of both breast and ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, we suggest that sequencing all of the coding regions of the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes using NGS is a feasible approach for individuals who are at risk of developing BRCA-related cancer according to NCCN guidelines. The 5266dupC pathogenic variation, as the most common pathogenic variation in the Trakya region of Turkey, should be included if a targeted mutatin screening is planned.

Factors associated with referral and completion of genetic counseling in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that all women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer undergo genetic testing, as the diagnosis of pathogenic variants may inform cancer survival and impact treatment options. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with referral to genetic counseling in women with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified women with epithelial ovarian cancer from 2012 to 2017 at Massachusetts General Hospital and North Shore Medical Center, a community hospital affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated how race, age, stage, year of diagnosis, insurance status, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and language relates to the receipt of genetic counseling. RESULTS: Of the total 276 women included, 73.9% were referred for genetic screening, of which 90.7% attended a genetic counseling visit. Older women were less likely to undergo genetic counseling (age ≥70 years: OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.94, p=0.04). Women who died within 365 days of initial oncology consult rarely reached a genetic counselor (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p<0.001). Women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer were more likely to undergo counseling (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.74-6.15, p<0.001). There was no difference in receipt of genetic counseling by race, stage, year of diagnosis, insurance status, or language. CONCLUSION: Older women with epithelial ovarian cancer and those who died within 1 year of initiation of care were less likely to undergo recommended genetic counseling. Race, insurance status, and language were not identified as predictive factors, although we were limited in this assessment by small sample size.

Pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index is superior to platelet count in predicting disease-specific survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Both pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index and platelet count were reported to be independent prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. However, their relationship has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index and platelet count, and to compare their utility as prognostic indicators for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Clinical data from epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated between April 2007 and March 2016 were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The association between the pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index and platelet count was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. After determining the cut-off values for the pre-treatment platelet count and prognostic nutritional index for predicting disease-specific survival by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, we compared the clinical utility of platelet counts and the prognostic nutritional index. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 57 (range 16-81) years. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical stage at initial diagnosis was stage I in 137 patients (44.5%), stage II in 27 patients (8.8%), stage III in 96 patients (31.2%), and stage IV in 48 patients (15.6%). Most patients (37.7%) had serous adenocarcinoma. Of the 295 patients who underwent primary or interval debulking surgery, optimal debulking was performed in 240 patients (77.9%). Decresed pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index was correlated with increased pre-treatment platelet count (p<0.0001), and when compared, the prognostic nutritional index had a significantly greater area under the ROC curve value than the platelet count for predicting disease-specific survival (0.8348 vs 0.6413, p=0.0007). An elevated platelet count was significantly associated with a shorter disease-specific survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients (p<0.0001). However, when the prognostic nutritional index was adjusted, an elevated platelet count did not provide any prognostic information (lower prognostic nutritional index, p=0.45; higher prognostic nutritional index, p=0.77). CONCLUSIONS: The pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index was superior to the platelet count for predicting disease-specific survival for epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Although pre-treatment thrombocytosis was reported to be an independent poor prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer patients, it generally reflects a lower prognostic nutritional index, and did not provide any prognostic information when the prognostic nutritional index was adjusted.

Effect of Cultural, Folk, and Religious Beliefs and Practices on Delays in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer in African American Women.

BACKGROUND: Certain cultural, folk, and religious beliefs that are more common among African Americans (AAs) have been associated with later-stage breast cancer. It is unknown if these beliefs are similarly associated with delays in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data from a multicenter case-control study of ovarian cancer in AA women were used to examine associations between cultural/folk beliefs and religious practices and stage at diagnosis and symptom duration before diagnosis. Associations between cultural/folk beliefs or religious practices and stage at diagnosis were assessed with logistic regression analyses, and associations with symptom duration with linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Agreement with several of the cultural/folk belief statements was high (e.g., 40% agreed that "if a person prays about cancer, God will heal it without medical treatments"), and ∼90% of women expressed moderate to high levels of religiosity/spirituality. Higher levels of religiosity/spirituality were associated with a twofold increase in the odds of stage III-IV ovarian cancer, whereas agreement with the cultural/folk belief statements was not associated with stage. Symptom duration before diagnosis was not consistently associated with cultural/folk beliefs or religiosity/spirituality. CONCLUSIONS: Women who reported stronger religious beliefs or practices had increased odds of higher stage ovarian cancer. Inaccurate cultural/folk beliefs about cancer treament were not associated with stage; however, these beliefs were highly prevalent in our population and could impact patient treatment decisions. Our findings suggest opportunities for health education interventions, especially working with churches, and improved doctor-patient communication.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer classically presents with vague persistent gastrointestinal, urologic, or nonacute abdominal/pelvic symptoms (bloating, early satiety, discomfort). Ultimately, a pelvic examination or imaging identifies an adnexal mass typically with accompanied advanced peritoneal dissemination. Management involves aggressive cytoreductive surgery in combination with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Over the last 20 years, optimal resection and mode and timing of chemotherapy have evolved. The authors review the initial diagnosis and management and present the available data and recommendations to guide the decision tree of when to use neoadjuvant, intraperitoneal, HIPEC, dose-dense, and maintenance chemotherapy in the front-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.