RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in receipt of care for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are well described. However, no previous studies have evaluated the association between mortgage denial rates and receipt of timely and guideline-concordant care for NSCLC and patient outcomes. METHODS: We identified individuals ≥18 years diagnosed with NSCLC between 2014 and 2019 from the National Cancer Database. Using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database, we calculated the proportion of denied home loans to total loans at the zip-code level and categorized them into quintiles. Our outcomes included receipt of guideline-concordant care based on clinical and pathologic stage at diagnosis and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, time from surgery to chemotherapy initiation, and overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 629,288 individuals diagnosed with NSCLC (median age 69; IQR 61-76 years, 49.1% female), 47.8% did not receive guideline-concordant care. Residing in areas with higher mortgage denial rates and lower income was associated with worse guideline-concordant care overall (aRR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.25-1.32) and for each cancer treatment modality, worse receipt of timely chemotherapy (aHR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.11-1.17) and worse overall survival (aHR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.19-1.22), compared with residing in areas with the lowest mortgage denial rate and highest income. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level mortgage denial rate was associated with worse receipt of timely and guideline-concordant NSCLC care and survival. This highlights the critical need to understand and address systemic practices, such as mortgage denial, that limit access to resources and are associated with worse access to quality cancer care and outcomes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Masculino , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Grupos RaciaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Electronic health record (EHR) data are widely used in precision medicine, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and population health management. However, a significant amount of EHR data are stored in unstructured formats including scanned documents external to the treatment facility presenting an informatics challenge for secondary use. Studies are needed to characterize the clinical information uniquely available in scanned outside documents (SODs) to understand to what extent the availability of such information affects the use of these real-world data for cancer research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent EHR data abstractions capturing 30 variables commonly used in oncology research were conducted for 125 patients treated for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at a comprehensive cancer center, with and without consideration of SODs. Completeness and concordance were compared between the two abstractions, overall, and by patient groups and variable types. RESULTS: The overall completeness of the data with SODs was 77.6% as compared with 54.3% for the abstraction without SODs. The differences in completeness were driven by data related to biomarker tests, which were more likely to be uniquely available in SODs. Such data were prone to missingness among patients who were diagnosed externally. CONCLUSION: There were no major differences in completeness between the two abstractions by demographics, diagnosis, disease progression, performance status, or oral therapy use. However, biomarker data were more likely to be uniquely contained in the SODs. Our findings may help cancer centers prioritize the types of SOD data being abstracted for research or other secondary purposes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Oncologia , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
PURPOSE: It remains unclear why individuals living in disadvantaged neighborhoods have shorter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. It is possible that living in these deprived areas is linked with increased risk of developing aggressive NSCLC biology. Here, we explored the association of somatic KRAS mutations, which are associated with shorter survival in NSCLC patients, and 11 definitions of neighborhood disadvantage spanning socioeconomic and structural environmental elements. METHODS: We analyzed data from 429 NSCLC patients treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2015 to 2018. Data were abstracted from medical records and each patient's home address was used to assign publicly available indices of neighborhood disadvantage. Prevalence Ratios (PRs) for the presence of somatic KRAS mutations were estimated using modified Poisson regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, cancer stage, and histology. RESULTS: In the NSCLC cohort, 29% had KRAS mutation-positive tumors. We found that five deprivation indices of socioeconomic disadvantage were associated with KRAS mutation. A one decile increase in several of these socioeconomic disadvantage indices was associated with a 1.06 to 1.14 increased risk of KRAS mutation. Measures of built structural environment were not associated with KRAS mutation status. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disadvantage at the neighborhood level is associated with higher risk of KRAS mutation while disadvantage related to built environmental structural measures was inversely associated. Our results indicate not only that neighborhood disadvantage may contribute to aggressive NSCLC biology, but the pathways linking biology to disadvantage are likely operating through socioeconomic-related stress.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Características de Residência , Características da Vizinhança , MutaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Travel time to treatment facilities may impede the receipt of guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) among patients diagnosed with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). We investigated the relative contribution of travel time in the receipt of GCT among ES-NSCLC patients. METHODS: We included 22,821 ES-NSCLC patients diagnosed in California from 2006-2015. GCT was defined using the 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and delayed treatment was defined as treatment initiation >6 versus ≤6 weeks after diagnosis. Mean-centered driving and public transit times were calculated from patients' residential block group centroid to the treatment facilities. We used logistic regression to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between patients' travel time and receipt of GCT and timely treatment, overall and by race/ethnicity and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). RESULTS: Overall, a 15-minute increase in travel time was associated with a decreased risk of undertreatment and delayed treatment. Compared to Whites, among Blacks, a 15-minute increase in driving time was associated with a 24% (95%CI = 8%-42%) increased risk of undertreatment, and among Filipinos, a 15-minute increase in public transit time was associated with a 27% (95%CI = 13%-42%) increased risk of delayed treatment. Compared to the highest nSES, among the lowest nSES, 15-minute increases in driving and public transit times were associated with 33% (95%CI = 16%-52%) and 27% (95%CI = 16%-39%) increases in the risk of undertreatment and delayed treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: The benefit of GCT observed with increased travel times may be a 'Travel Time Paradox,' and may vary across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , California/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Classe SocialRESUMO
Limited previous work has identified a relationship between exposure to ambient air pollution and aggressive somatic lung tumor mutations. More work is needed to confirm this relationship, especially using spatially resolved air pollution. We aimed to quantify the association between different air pollution metrics and aggressive tumor biology. Among patients treated at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, CA (2013-2018), three non-small cell lung cancer somatic tumor mutations, TP53, KRAS, and KRAS G12C/V, were documented. PM2.5 exposure was assessed using state-of-the art ensemble models five and ten years before lung cancer diagnosis. We also explored the role of NO2 using inverse-distance-weighting approaches. We fitted logistic regression models to estimate odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 435 participants (median age: 67, female: 51%), an IQR increase in NO2 exposure (3.5 µg/m3) five years before cancer diagnosis was associated with an increased risk in TP53 mutation (OR, 95% CI: 1.30, 0.99-1.71). We found an association between highly-exposed participants to PM2.5 (>12 µg/m3) five and ten years before cancer diagnosis and TP53 mutation (OR, 95% CI: 1.61, 0.95-2.73; 1.57, 0.93-2.64, respectively). Future studies are needed to confirm this association and better understand how air pollution impacts somatic profiles and the molecular mechanisms through which they operate.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Material Particulado , Idoso , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Mutação , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/análise , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment within 12 months of diagnosis, and survival by country of birth for people diagnosed with invasive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND SETTING: A population-based cohort study of NSW residents diagnosed with NSCLC in 2003-2016 using de-identified linked data from the NSW Cancer Registry, NSW Admitted Patient Data collection, Emergency Departments, Medicare Benefits and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, and National Death Index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds of receiving any treatment, surgery, systemic therapy, or radiotherapy respectively, in the 12 months following diagnosis were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. The hazard of death (all-cause) at one- and five-years following diagnosis was calculated using multivariable proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: 27,114 People were recorded with NSCLC in the 14-year study period. Higher percentages of older males from European countries applied in the earlier years, with a shift to younger people from South East Asia, New Zealand, and the Middle East. Adjusted analyses indicated that, compared with the Australian born, people from European countries were more likely to receive treatment, and, specifically surgery. Also, people from Asian countries were more likely to receive systemic therapy but less likely to receive radiotherapy. Survival at one- and five-years following diagnosis was higher for people born in countries other than Australia, New Zealand the United Kingdom and Germany. CONCLUSIONS: Variations exist in treatment and survival by country of birth in NSW. This may be affected by differences in factors not recorded in the NSW Registry, including use of general health services, family histories, underlying health conditions, other intrinsic factors, and cultural, social, and behavioural influences.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , New South Wales/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The nutritional status can potentially affect the efficacy of cancer therapy. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), a simple index for evaluating nutritional status calculated from body weight and serum albumin levels, has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various diseases. However, the relationships between GNRI and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unknown. METHODS: The pretreatment levels of GNRI were retrospectively evaluated in 148 chemo-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and scored as low or high. RESULTS: Patients with a high GNRI had a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR; 44.5% [95% confidence interval {CI} = 35.6%-53.9%] vs. 15.8% [95% CI = 7.4%-30.4%, p = 0.002), longer median progression-free survival (PFS; 6.3 months [95% CI = 5.6-7.2 months] vs. 3.8 months [95% CI = 2.5-4.7 months], p < 0.001), and longer median overall survival (OS; 22.8 months [95% CI = 16.7-27.2 months] vs. 8.5 months [95% CI = 5.4-16.0 months], p < 0.001) than those with low GNRI. High GNRI was independently predictive of better ORR in multivariate logistic regression analysis and longer PFS and OS in multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. In 71 patients who received second-line non-platinum chemotherapy, patients with high GNRI exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS than those with low GNRI (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GNRI was predictive of prolonged survival in patients with NSCLC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and second-line non-platinum chemotherapy. Assessment of the nutritional status may be useful for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Avaliação Nutricional , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminas/análise , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/sangue , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Platina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Poor patients often reside in neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with high levels of airborne pollutants. They also have higher mortality from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than those living in wealthier communities. We investigated whether living in polluted neighborhoods is associated with somatic mutations linked with lower survival rates, i.e., TP53 mutations. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 478 patients with NSCLC treated at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2018, we used logistic regression to assess associations between individual demographic and clinical characteristics, including somatic TP53 mutation status and environmental risk factors of annual average particulate matter (PM2.5) levels, and neighborhood SES. RESULTS: 277 patients (58%) had somatic TP53 mutations. Of those, 45% lived in neighborhoods with "moderate" Environmental Protection Agency-defined PM2.5 exposure, compared with 39% of patients without TP53 mutations. We found significant associations between living in neighborhoods with "moderate" versus "good" PM2.5 concentrations and minority population percentage [OR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.08]. There was a significant association between presence of TP53 mutations and PM2.5 exposure (moderate versus good: OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.02-2.72) after adjusting for patient characteristics, other environmental factors, and neighborhood-level SES. CONCLUSIONS: When controlling for individual- and neighborhood-level confounders, we find that the odds of having a TP53-mutated NSCLC are increased in areas with higher PM2.5 exposure. IMPACT: The link between pollution and aggressive biology may contribute to the increased burden of adverse NSCLC outcomes in individuals living in lower SES neighborhoods.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/induzido quimicamente , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Idoso , California/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Masculino , Mutação , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Áreas de Pobreza , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Precision medicine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires molecular biomarker testing in patients with nonsquamous and select patients with squamous histologies, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing in both. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are rates of molecular and PD-L1 biomarker testing in patients with advanced NSCLC in community practices, and do rates vary by sociodemographic factors? What is the prevalence of molecular biomarker mutations and PD-L1 expression levels? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From 389 stage IV NSCLC pathology reports obtained through the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center's Rapid Case Ascertainment Program from 38 community hospitals across North Carolina, we abstracted demographics, histology, molecular biomarker testing and results, and PD-L1 testing and expression. We geocoded patient and hospital addresses to determine travel time, distance to care, and census block level contextual variables. We compared molecular biomarker and PD-L1 testing rates, the prevalence of molecular biomarkers, and PD-L1 expression levels by race and sex, using χ2 tests. We determined predictors of testing, using multivariable logistic regression and report adjusted ORs and 95%CI. RESULTS: Among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, 64.4% were tested for molecular biomarkers, and among all NSCLC patients 53.2% were tested for PD-L1 expression. Differences in biomarker testing rates by sociodemographic factors were not statistically significant in univariate or adjusted analyses. Adjusted analyses showed that patients living in areas with higher household internet access were more likely to undergo PD-L1 testing (adjusted OR = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.02-2.71). Sociodemographic differences in molecular biomarker prevalence and PD-L1 expression levels were not statistically significant, except for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations, which occurred in 16.7% of males vs 0% in females, P = .05. INTERPRETATION: Biomarker testing remains underused in NSCLC. Future work should include larger populations and evaluate hospital-specific testing protocols to identify and address barriers to guideline-recommended testing.
Assuntos
Antígeno B7-H1 , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno B7-H1/análise , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Testes Farmacogenômicos/métodos , Testes Farmacogenômicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Fatores Sociodemográficos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend biomarker testing as the first step in the management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). We assessed anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) testing rates and factors related to underuse in community medical systems between 2012 and 2019 to understand guideline adoption. METHODS: A retrospective observational study using a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database was conducted. Patients with aNSCLC diagnosed in community medical centers from January 2012 to May 2019 were included to describe the ALK testing trend. This cohort was further restricted to patients diagnosed after 2015 to understand factors associated with testing underuse using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Trends for increased ALK testing rates by year were observed in both NCCN guideline-eligible patients (59.5% in 2012 to 84.1% in 2019) and -ineligible patients (15.6% to 50.8%) in a cohort of 41,728 patients. Histology type and smoking status had the greatest impact on test use. Compared with patients with nonsquamous histology and no smoking history, patients with squamous histology and no smoking history (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-10.4), NSCLC histology not otherwise specified (NOS) with smoking history (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8-4.2); NSCLC NOS/nonsmoker (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2), and nonsquamous/smoker (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7) were less likely to be tested. Factors related to underuse also included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, stage at initial diagnosis, and demographics. CONCLUSION: This analysis of real-world data shows increasing test use by year; however, one fifth of patients eligible for ALK testing still remain untested and potentially missing therapeutic options. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Advancement in treatment of lung cancer is accompanied by an increasing number of tests that should be run to determine potential therapy options for each patient. This study assessed adoption of testing recommendations for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements in a national database. Although test use increased over the time period studied (2012-2019), there is still room for improvement. Efforts are needed to increase test use in undertested groups, thus enabling eligible patients to benefit from novel lung cancer therapies.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The continued introduction of biomarkers and innovative testing methods makes already complex diagnosis in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) even more complex. This study primarily analyzed variations in biomarker testing in clinical practice in patients referred to a comprehensive cancer center in the Netherlands. The secondary aim was to compare the cost of biomarker testing with the cost of whole-genome sequencing. The cohort included 102 stage IV NSCLC patients who received biomarker testing in 2017 or 2018 at the comprehensive cancer center. The complete biomarker testing history of the cohort was identified using linked data from the comprehensive cancer center and the nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology in the Netherlands. Unique biomarker-test combinations, costs, turnaround times, and test utilization were examined. The results indicate substantial variation in test utilization and sequences. The mean cost per patient of biomarker testing was 2259.92 ± 1217.10 USD, or 1881.23 ± 1013.15 EUR. Targeted gene panels were most frequently conducted, followed by IHC analysis for programmed cell death protein ligand 1. Typically, the most common biomarkers were assessed within the first tests, and emerging biomarkers were tested further down the test sequence. At the cost of current biomarker testing, replacing current testing with whole-genome sequencing would have led to cost-savings in only two patients (2%).
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/economia , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/economia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial to ensure uniform allocation to the optimal treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but may differ among multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs). Discordance between clinical and pathologic TNM stage is particularly important for patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA) because it may influence their chance of allocation to curative-intent treatment. We therefore aimed to study agreement on staging and treatment to gain insight into MDT decision-making. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the level of agreement on clinical staging and treatment recommendations among MDTs in stage IIIA NSCLC patients? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven MDTs each evaluated the same 10 pathologic stage IIIA NSCLC patients in their weekly meeting (n = 110). Patients were selected purposively for their challenging nature. All MDTs received exactly the same clinical information and images per patient. We tested agreement in cT stage, cN stage, cM stage (TNM 8th edition), and treatment proposal among MDTs using Randolph's free-marginal multirater kappa. RESULTS: Considerable variation among the MDTs was seen in T staging (κ, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.75]), N staging (κ, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.83]), overall TNM staging (κ, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.72]), and treatment recommendations (κ, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.32-0.56]). Most variation in T stage was seen in patients with suspicion of invasion of surrounding structures, which influenced such treatment recommendations as induction therapy and type. For N stage, distinction between N1 and N2 disease was an important source of discordance among MDTs. Variation occurred between 2 patients even regarding M stage. A wide range of additional diagnostics was proposed by the MDTs. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrated high variation in staging and treatment of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC among MDTs in different hospitals. Although some variation may be unavoidable in these challenging patients, we should strive for more uniformity.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Protocolos Clínicos/classificação , Procedimentos Clínicos/classificação , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer cases among the population of the canton Zurich, are registered in the Cancer Registry of the cantons of Zurich and Zug (KKR). The Thoracic Oncology Center, founded in 2011 is one of 17 multidisciplinary centers within the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich (CCCZ). METHODS: The aim of the current study is to quantify the mortality risk of patients with NSCLC and identify differences on survival and other factors between patients receiving their primary treatment at the CCCZ and those treated elsewhere and registered by KKR. The differential effect between CCCZ and KKR cohorts on survival: overall, by stage, sex and age, is explored. Stratified log-rank and Wilcoxon tests, Cox models and restricted mean survival times (RMST) are estimated. Propensity score matching (PSM) is also used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Analysis included 848 NSCLC cases from the CCCZ and 1759 from the KKR, diagnosed between January 2011 and December 2015. At a median follow-up of 57 months, overall survival (OS) was significantly superior for patients treated at the CCCZ compared to KKR [Median OS: 36.0 months (95%CI: 31.0-45.0) and 12.0 months (95%CI: 11.0-13.0), respectively, stratified log-rank pâ¯<â¯0.001; adjusted HRâ¯=â¯1.31, (95% CI: 1.18-1.46), difference in RMST up to 72 months: 13.8 months (95%CI: 11.5-16.2), pâ¯<â¯0.001]. The effect of cohort was significant for stages III and IV (overall and also by sex and age). After PSM OS remained significantly superior for patients treated at the CCCZ compared to KKR. CONCLUSIONS: The survival probability for patients in the CCCZ cohort was superior to that of patients in the canton Zürich treated outside the center. This analysis provides further evidence of the importance of the volume of experience and the availability of a multidisciplinary organization and research environment, as delivered by a comprehensive cancer center, on the outcome of patients with NSCLC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine guideline concordance across a national sample and determine the relationship between socioeconomic factors, use of recommended postoperative adjuvant therapy, and outcomes for patients with resected pN1 or pN2 non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: All margin-negative pT1-3 N1-2 M0 non-small cell lung cancers treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy without induction therapy in the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2013 were included. Use of guideline-concordant adjuvant treatment, defined as chemotherapy for pN1 disease and chemotherapy with or without radiation for pN2 disease, was examined. Multivariable regression models were developed to determine associations of clinical factors with guideline adherence. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: Of 13,462 patients, 10,113 had pN1 disease and 3349 had pN2 disease. Guideline-concordant adjuvant therapy was used in 6844 (67.7%) patients with pN1 disease and 2622 (78.3%) patients with pN2 disease. After multivariable adjustment, insurance status, older age, pneumonectomy, readmission, and longer postoperative stays were associated with lower likelihood of guideline concordance. Conversely, increased education level, later year of diagnosis, and greater nodal stage were associated with greater concordance. Overall, patients treated with guideline-concordant therapy had superior survival (5-year survival: 51.6 vs 36.0%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.70, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors, including insurance status and geographic region, are associated with disparities in use of adjuvant therapy as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. These disparities significantly impact patient survival. Future work should focus on improving access to appropriate adjuvant therapies among the under insured and socioeconomically disadvantaged.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonectomia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/mortalidade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are observed in approximately 15% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the USA. Little is known about treatment patterns in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC following progression on or after first-line (1L) treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, is a treatment option for patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC following progression on 1L EGFR-TKIs. This study analyzed real-world treatment sequencing of EGFR-TKIs, EGFR T790M testing rates, and disposition of patients with EGFR mutations after 1L EGFR-TKI post-FDA approval of osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. METHODS: Adult patients with stage IV NSCLC and documented EGFR mutation-positive status were identified between December 1, 2015 and May 31, 2017 from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed™ electronic health record (EHR). Data were abstracted from the EHR database and supplemented by chart review. RESULTS: Of 308 patients, 302 (98%) received an EGFR-TKI overall, and 246 patients (80%) received a 1L EGFR-TKI. The most common 1L EGFR-TKI was erlotinib (66%); the remaining 1L regimens were predominantly combination chemotherapies with or without an EGFR-TKI. Only 80 patients (26%) received any 2L therapy. The most common EGFR-TKIs used as 2L monotherapy in patients who received 1L EGFR-TKI were afatinib and osimertinib (n = 7 for both). Among all patients treated with 1L EGFR-TKI (n = 246), 47 (19%) were tested for EGFR T790M [16 patients (34%) were positive], 48 (20%) remained on 1L EGFR-TKI, 29 (12%) received subsequent therapy, 38 (15%) had died on or after their 1L EGFR-TKI therapy, and 131 (53%) stopped their EGFR-TKI with no recorded evidence of having received subsequent therapy at follow-up end. CONCLUSION: Following 1L EGFR-TKI treatment, 19% of patients were tested for EGFR T790M, and most (69%) had no record of receiving any subsequent therapy.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores ErbB/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between Chinese medicine (CM) therapy and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes in postoperative patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This multiple-center prospective cohort study was conducted in 13 medical centers in China. Patients with stage I, II, or IIIA NSCLC who had undergone radical resection and received conventional postoperative treatment according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were recruited. The recruited patients were divided into a CM treatment group and a control group according to their wishes. Patients in the CM treatment group received continuous CM therapy for more than 6 months or until disease progression. Patients in the control group received CM therapy for less than 1 month. Follow-up was conducted over 3 years. The primary outcome was DFS, with recurrence/metastasis rates as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Between May 2013 and August 2016, 503 patients were enrolled into the cohort; 266 were classified in the CM treatment group and 237 in the control group. Adjusting for covariates, high exposure to CM was associated with better DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.417, 95% confidential interval (CI): 0.307-0.567)]. A longer duration of CM therapy (6-12 months, 12-18 months, >24 months) was associated with lower recurrence and metastasis rates (HR = 0.225, 0.119 and 0.083, respectively). In a subgroup exploratory analysis, CM therapy was also a protective factor of cancer recurrence and metastasis in both stage I-IIIA (HR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67) and stage IIIA NSCLC postoperative patients (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.33-0.71), DFS was even longer among CM treatment group patients. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of CM therapy could be considered a protective factor of cancer recurrence and metastasis. CM treatment is associated with improving survival outcomes of postoperative NSCLC patients in China. (Registration No. ChiCTR-OOC-14005398).
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/métodos , Medicina Tradicional Chinesa/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Operatório , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated appropriate baseline characteristics for screening a Chinese population at high risk of early lung cancer, assisted by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) with computer-aided detection (CAD). Included is a discussion of the viability of using LDCT in the screening guideline and optimizing the guideline. METHODS: In 2014, 1016 individuals from Sichuan Province were enrolled who satisfied the criteria for high risk according to the 2013 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. From 2014 to 2018, each subject was followed using LDCT with CAD, and pathologically confirmed lung cancers and baseline nodule characteristics (size and density) were recorded. Positive risk was considered a non-calcified solid or part-solid nodule on LDCT with diameter ≥5â¯mm and ground-glass nodule ≥8â¯mm, as newly recommended by the China National Lung Cancer Screening Guideline. RESULTS: From 2014-2018, 13 cases of lung cancer were detected; 5 of these were early stage (38.5%). According to the NCCN criteria, 54 women were included and one of these (1.8%) developed lung cancer. The prevalence of lung cancer was 0.7% at baseline. For the entire population (excluding subjects with a tumor mass at baseline, nâ¯=â¯4), the rate of positivity was 20.4% at baseline; applying the Chinese criteria, the false positive rate was 19.5% (197/1012). CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are warranted to establish appropriate eligible criteria and management strategies for Chinese populations.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Idoso , China , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate of about 18%. Thus, there is a great need for novel therapeutic approaches to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for a subset of patients, especially those with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and/or high tumor mutational burden, but have failed in the majority of patients. Increasing evidence suggests that the estrogen signaling pathway may be a therapeutic target in metastatic NSCLC and that the estrogen pathway may play a role in sex-based responses to ICIs. This report will review the epidemiologic, preclinical and clinical data on the estrogen pathway in NSCLC, its implications in sex-based responses to ICIs and the potential use of antiestrogen therapy in combination with ICIs.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Moduladores de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Estrogênios/metabolismo , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Fatores Sexuais , Animais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/imunologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Transdução de Sinais , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical audit may improve practice in cancer service provision. The UK National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) collects data for all new cases of thoracic cancers. AIM: To collect similar data for our Victorian patients from six hospitals within the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre and associated Western and Central Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of all newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer and mesothelioma in 2013 across the six Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre/Western and Central Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service hospitals. The objectives were to adapt the NLCA data set for use in the Australian context, to analyse the findings using descriptive statistics and to determine feasibility of implementing a routine, ongoing audit similar to that in the UK. Individual data items were adapted from the NLCA by an expert steering committee. Data were collated from the Victorian Cancer Registry, Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset and individual hospital databases. Individual medical records were audited for missing data. RESULTS: Eight hundred and forty-five patients were diagnosed across the sites in 2013. Most were aged 65-80 (55%) and were male (62%). Most had non-small-cell lung cancer (81%) with 9% diagnosed with small cell lung cancer and 2% with mesothelioma. Data completeness varied significantly between fields. For those with higher levels of completeness, headline indicators of clinical care were comparable with NLCA data. The Victorian population seem to lack access to specialist lung cancer nurse services. CONCLUSION: Lung cancer care at participating hospitals appeared to be comparable with the UK in 2013. In future, prospective data collection should be harmonised across sites and correlated with survival outcomes. One area of concern was a lack of documented access to specialist nursing services.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Auditoria Médica , Mesotelioma/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Mesotelioma/patologia , Mesotelioma/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We questioned whether the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with stage ≥ IB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was high-yield compared with American College of Clinical Pharmacy and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommending stage III and above NSCLC. We present the prevalence and factors predictive of asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis in patients with NSCLC without extracranial metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 193 consecutive, treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 2010 and August 2015 was performed. Exclusion criteria included no brain MRI staging, symptomatic brain metastases, or stage IV based on extracranial disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The patient characteristics include median age of 65 years (range, 36-90 years), 51% adenocarcinoma/36% squamous carcinoma, and pre-MRI stage grouping of 31% I, 22% II, 34% IIIA, and 13% IIIB. The overall prevalence of brain metastases was 5.7% (n = 11). One (2.4%) stage IA and 1 (5.6%) stage IB patient had asymptomatic brain metastases at diagnosis, both were adenocarcinomas. On univariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal stage (P = .02), lymph nodal size > 2 cm (P = .009), multi-lymph nodal N1/N2 station involvement (P = .027), and overall stage (P = .005) were associated with asymptomatic brain metastases. On multivariate analysis, increasing lymph nodal size remained significant (odds ratio, 1.545; P = .009). CONCLUSION: Our series shows a 5.7% rate of asymptomatic brain metastasis for patients with stage I to III NSCLC. Increasing lymph nodal size was the only predictor of asymptomatic brain metastases, suggesting over-utilization of MRI in early-stage disease, especially in lymph node-negative patients with NSCLC. Future efforts will explore the utility of baseline MRI in lymph node-positive stage II and all stage IIIA patients.