A survey study of the use of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in various clinical scenarios by expert electrophysiologists in Poland.

BACKGROUND: A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has become a recognized alternative to a traditional transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (T-ICD). Despite the growing evidence of non-inferiority of S-ICD, there are no clear clinical guidelines for selection of either of the two available systems. The aim of the study was to analyze the decisions made in predefined typical clinical scenarios by Polish cardiologists experienced in the use of both S-ICDs and T-ICDs. METHODS: A group of 30 experts of cardiac electrotherapy experienced in the use of S-ICDs was recruited and invited to participate in a web-based anonymous survey. The survey questions regarded the proposed therapy in various but typical clinical scenarios. RESULTS: From the invited 30 experts representing 18 clinical centers, 25 completed the survey. 72% of them declared that the number of S-ICDs implanted at their center during the preceding 12 months exceeded 10, and 40% - that it was over 20. Rates of responders preferring S-ICD or T-ICD in various clinical scenarios are reported and discussed in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Significant divergence of opinion exists among Polish experts regarding the use of a subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator. It is especially pronounced on the issue of the use of the system in middle-age patients, in case of complications of the hitherto ICD therapy, or the need of upgrading the existing cardiac implantable electronic device.

Reappraisal on pharmacological and mechanical treatments of heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a highly frequent disorder with considerable morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality; thus, it invariably places pressure on clinical and public health systems in the modern world. There have been notable advances in the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of HF, and newly developed agents and devices have been widely adopted in clinical practice. Here, this review first summarizes the current emerging therapeutic agents, including pharmacotherapy, device-based therapy, and the treatment of some common comorbidities, to improve the prognosis of HF patients. Then, we discuss and point out the commonalities and areas for improvement in current clinical studies of HF. Finally, we highlight the gaps in HF research. We are looking forward to a bright future with reduced morbidity and mortality from HF.

The role of atrial sensing for new-onset atrial arrhythmias diagnosis and management in single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Results from the THINGS registry.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia/fibrillation (AT/AF) episodes are common in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients and can be undetected by standard single-chamber devices. This study aims to explore whether a single-lead ICD with an atrial dipole (ICD DX; BIOTRONIK SE & Co, Berlin, Germany) could improve the AT/AF diagnosis and management as compared to standard ICD (ICD VR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected patients without AT/AF history from the THINGS registry which included consecutive patients implanted with ICD for standard indications. The ICD VR and the ICD DX groups included 236 (62.8%) and 140 (37.2%) patients, respectively, and had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 27 months, there were 7 AT/AF diagnoses in the ICD VR and 18 in the ICD DX group. The 2-year incidence of AT/AF diagnosis was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6%-9.6%) for the ICD VR and 11.4% (95% CI: 6.8%-18.9%) for the ICD DX group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.85 [95% CI: 1.58-9.41]; P = .003). Initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC) due to AT/AF diagnosis was reported in 15 patients. The 2-year incidence of OAC onset was 3.6% (95% CI: 1.6%-7.8%) for the ICD VR and 6.3% (95% CI: 3.0%-12.7%) for ICD DX group (adjusted HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.72-5.56]; P = .184). CONCLUSION: We observed that atrial sensing capability in single-chamber ICD patients without evidence of atrial arrhythmias at implant is associated with a greater likelihood of detecting AT/AF episodes. The management of these diagnosed arrhythmias often led to clinical interventions, mainly represented by initiation of OAC therapy.

Periprocedural hypotension after conscious sedation versus local anesthesia during defibrillator implantation for left ventricular dysfunction: analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan.

The association between periprocedural hypotension and conscious sedation (CS) during defibrillator implantation remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to compare the occurrence of periprocedural hypotension after CS or local anesthesia (LA) during defibrillator implantation in a retrospective cohort study using a national inpatient database. Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively collected data for adult inpatients who underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy device from July 2010 to March 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the occurrence of periprocedural hypotension between the CS and LA groups with adjustment for patient background characteristics and hospital factors. Additional analysis was performed after dividing the CS group into each specific anesthetic use. We identified 4842 patients, comprising 1533 patients with CS and 3309 with LA. The CS group had a significantly higher proportion of periprocedural hypotension than the LA group (13.4% versus 9.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.04; p = 0.001). Body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2, New York Heart Association Class IV, and use of cardiac resynchronization therapy device were independently associated with occurrence of periprocedural hypotension. Additionally, ketamine and dexmedetomidine were significantly associated with higher incidence of hypotension than the LA group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-5.26; p = 0.006; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.12; p = 0.019, respectively). Periprocedural hypotension was significantly more likely to occur in the CS group than the LA group, and was associated with CS.

Minimal defibrillation thresholds and the correlation with implant position in subcutaneous implantable-defibrillator patients.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the subcutaneous implantable-defibrillator (S-ICD) knowledge of factors elevating the defibrillation threshold (DFT), have increased. Optimal device positioning most likely results in a decrease in DFT. The PRAETORIAN score is a tool to systematically evaluate S-ICD implant position and predict conversion success by estimating the DFT on a chest X-ray. The objective of this study is to determine DFT in de novo S-ICD patients. METHODS: De novo S-ICD patients were enrolled with DFT testing using a single 30 J shock or a prespecified step-down protocol. Chest X-rays were obtained and implant position was evaluated using the PRAETORIAN score. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, age 47 (±18) years and body mass index (BMI) 25(±3) kg/m2 , underwent conversion testing with a single 30 J shock. Fourteen patients (93%) converted successfully. Implant position was optimal in all patients, PRAETORIAN score of 30 (100%). Twelve patients were available for analysis in the step-down DFT cohort, age 46 years (±15), left ventricular ejection fraction 50% (±15%) and a median BMI of 25.7 kg/m2 (range 23.8-29.1 kg/m2 ). No complications occurred during DFT testing. Mean DFT was 29 J (±12 J). Time to shock was 11 seconds (±2 seconds) for a 20 J shock compared with 17 seconds in case of a 70 J shock output. Nearly all patients were implanted with optimal device positioning with the lowest possible PRAETORIAN score of 30 (92%). CONCLUSION: DFT in S-ICD patients with optimal device positioning is lower than previously reported. Conversion testing using a low shock output reduced time to therapy by 6 seconds on average.

Ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: Anteroseptal vs inferolateral origin based on ICD ventricular electrogram timing.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) present a perivalvular substrate that is either predominantly antero-septal (AS) or infero-lateral (IL), corresponding to specific ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphologies. The relative timing of far-field and near-field ventricular electrograms (EGMs) from stored implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) events of VT may be used to distinguish AS from IL VT in NICM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 48 patients with NICM with either a primarily AS (54%) or IL (56%) VT source undergoing catheter ablation between 2003 and 2018. Only patients with retrievable ICD-EGMs of spontaneous VT events which could be matched with VTs induced during the ablation procedure were included. A total of 56 VT events (52% AS origin and 48% IL origin) were analyzed, yielding a mean far-field to near-field interval of 31 ± 13 milliseconds for AS VTs and 47 ± 19 milliseconds for IL VTs (P = .001). At receiver operating characteristic analysis (AUC = 0.734), a far-field to near-field interval of ≥ 60 milliseconds ruled out AS VTs in 29 (100%) cases and diagnosed IL VTs with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 63%. An interval of ≤ 20 milliseconds ruled out IL VTs in 25 (93%) cases and diagnosed AS VTs with a PPV of 83% and NPV of 57%. Significant overlap between the two groups was observed among far-field to near-field intervals in between 20 milliseconds and 60 milliseconds. CONCLUSIONS: The relative timing of far-field and near-field EGMs from stored clinical ICD events of VT can be helpful to differentiate AS vs IL origin of VT in NICM.

Safety and compatibility of smart device heart rhythm monitoring in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging medical technology has allowed for monitoring of heart rhythm abnormalities using smartphone compatible devices. The safety and utility of such devices have not been established in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). We sought to assess the safety and compatibility of the Food and Drug Administration-approved AliveCor Kardia device in patients with CIEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively recruited patients with CIED for a Kardia recording during their routine device interrogation. A recording was obtained in paced and nonpaced states. Adverse clinical events were noted at the time of recording. Electrograms (EGMs) from the cardiac device were obtained at the time of recording to assess for any electromagnetic interference (EMI) introduced by Kardia. Recordings were analyzed for quality and given a score of 3 (interpretable rhythm, no noise), 2 (interpretable rhythm, significant noise) or 1 (uninterpretable). A total of 251 patients were recruited (59% with a pacemaker and 41% with ICD). There were no adverse clinical events noted at the time of recording and no changes to CIED settings. Review of all EGMs revealed no EMI introduced by Kardia. Recordings were correctly interpreted in 90% of paced recordings (183 had a score of 3, 43 of 2, and 25 of 1) and 94.7% of nonpaced recordings (147 of 3, 15 of 2, and 9 of 1). CONCLUSION: The AliveCor Kardia device has an excellent safety profile when used in conjunction with most CIEDs. The quality of recordings was preserved in this population. The device, therefore, can be considered for heart rhythm monitoring in patients with CIEDs.

Predictors of left atrial appendage stunning after electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation.

The transient left atrial appendage (LAA) dysfunction after electrical cardioversion (CV), which is called as LAA-stunning, was found to be an important etiology of thrombus formation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk factors of LAA-stunning. This study included 134 patients who underwent catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal, non-valvular, and symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Internal-CV was performed, and LAA emptying fraction (LAA-EF) was assessed using LAA-angiogram before and just after CV. LAA-stunning (defined as 10% reduction of LAA-EF after CV) was observed in 45/134 patients (34%). Patients in LAA-stunning group had longer duration of AF prior to CV, higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), higher prevalence of patients taking calcium blocker, larger left atrial (LA) diameter, elevated E wave, and larger LA volume than those in non LAA-stunning group. Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of AF prior to CV (p = 0.015, OR 1.033 for 1 month extend, 95% CI 1.006-1.073) and elevated BNP (p = 0.038, OR 1.041 for each 10 pg/mL increase, 95% CI 1.001-1.009) were associated with LAA-stunning. In addition, all patients were divided into four groups based on the combination between duration of AF prior to CV and BNP; group 1 (low BNP/short-lasting AF), group 2 (high BNP/short-lasting AF), group 3 (low BNP/long-lasting AF), and group 4 (high BNP/long-lasting AF). The rate of LAA-stunning was the highest in the group 4 (55.6%). Elevated BNP and long duration of AF were associated with LAA stunning after electrical cardioversion.

Multiple ICD shocks in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy: What is the mechanism?

We present the case of a 45-year-old male patient with dilated cardiomyopathy who suffers from multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The analysis of the ICD tracing and the electrophysiological study allows to conclude that bundle branch re-entrant tachycardia is the most likely diagnosis, even in absence of conduction abnormalities in his basal electrocardiography.

Effectiveness of Implantable DEfibrillators Alert Systems: comparison between audible and vibratory alert: IDEAS study.

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alarm systems are an important means of monitoring device functioning. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of patients with sense two types of device alert systems: an audible alert and a vibratory alarm. METHODS: The ability to recognize the alarms was assessed in three alarm tests performed in a series of consecutive ICD patients enrolled during routine outpatient device follow-up. To avoid overestimating the rate of patients able to sense the alarm, the first test was performed without forewarning. Subsequently, the second test was performed after the patients had been forewarned. Finally, to assess the learning effect of a demonstration test, a third test was performed, again without forewarning. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients (65.4 ±â€Š14.4 years, 74.6% male) were enrolled: 347 (65.7%) with an audible alert-endowed device and 181 (34.3%) with a vibratory alarm-endowed device. When emitted without warning, the alarms were sensed by 72.4% of patients. When patients were forewarned, the probability of sensing the alarms rose to 92.5% (P < 0.001). In both cases, the vibratory alarm was more likely to be sensed than the audible alert (77.3 vs. 67.7% in the first case; 96.1 vs. 87.9% in the second case; all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ICD alarms emitted in an outpatient setting are sensed by a large proportion of patients, but not by all. Training patients by means of demonstration tests significantly increases the rate of patients who recognize the alarm. Vibratory alarm seems to be more effective than audible alert.

Dysfunctional hypoglossal nerve stimulator after electrical cardioversion: A case series.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Upper airway stimulation has demonstrated marked improvements in apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and quality-of-life measures in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure. Cardiac arrhythmias are common in patients with OSA and can require electrical cardioversion. We describe the first four reported cases of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) dysfunction after electrical cardioversion and illustrate our operative approach to device troubleshooting and repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A retrospective review of 201 HGNS implantations performed at two academic institutions revealed four cases of HGNS device dysfunction after electrical cardioversion requiring surgical revision. Preoperative and postoperative device performance metrics and electrical cardioversion specifications were retrospectively assessed and compiled for this case series. The senior authors (R.J.S., M.S.B.) detail operative planning and approach for HGNS implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacement. RESULTS: At least two patients with HGNS device dysfunction had received cardioversion via anterolateral electrode pad placement. Three patients had received multiple shocks. All four patients experienced a change in device functionality or complete cessation of functionality after electrocardioversion. Operatively, each patient required replacement of the IPG, with subsequent intraoperative interrogation revealing proper device functionality. CONCLUSION: Counseling for patients with HGNS undergoing external electrical cardioversion should include possible device damage and need for operative replacement. Anteroposterior electrode pad placement should be considered for patients with HGNS who require electrocardioversion. Operative replacement of an HGNS system damaged by electrocardioversion begins with IPG replacement and intraoperative device interrogation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:1949-1953, 2019.

Ventricular electrical delay as a predictor of arrhythmias in patients with cardiac resynchronization implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is inversely related to electrical dyssynchrony, measured as LV lead electrical delay (QLV). Presence of atrial or ventricular arrhythmia is correlated with worsening heart failure and LV remodeling. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the association of QLV with arrhythmic events in CRT recipients. METHODS: We identified patients implanted with a CRT device at our center. QLV interval was measured and corrected for baseline QRS (cQLV). We performed multivariable Logistic regression to assess the effect of cQLV on the occurrence of atrial/ventricular arrhythmic events. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included in analyses. The cQLV was significantly shorter in patients with atria tachycardia/supraventricular tachycardia (AT/SVT) events compared to patients without AT/SVT events (43.4 ± 22% vs. 60.3 ± 26.7%, p = .006). In contrast, no significant difference in cQLV was observed between patients with and without ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) events (46.2 ± 25.4% vs. 56 ± 25.7%, p = .13). cQLV was significantly shorter in patients with new onset AT/SVT events compared to those without (38.3 ± 22.2% vs. 55.7 ± 25.7%, p = .028). In contrast, no significant difference in cQLV was observed between patients with and without new onset VT/VF events (44.2 ± 25.2% vs. 56.3 ± 25.5%, p = .069). Following adjusted analyses, cQLV was a significant predictor of AT/SVT, but not for VT/VF. CONCLUSION: cQLV is a simple measure that can identify a vulnerable cohort of CRT patients at increased risk for atrial tachyarrhythmias, and hence can predict reverse remodeling and clinical response to CRT treatment.

Fitting the right non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant to the right patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: an evidence-based choice.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and systemic embolism (SE). Stroke prevention is a key element for the overall management of AF patients. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, are at least as effective as warfarin in reducing IS/SE with a lower rate of major bleeding. Various analyses from the large Phase III randomized trials demonstrated different efficacy and safety of NOACs in specific subgroups of patients. The randomized trials are supplemented by effectiveness and safety data from real-world observational cohorts following the availability of these drugs for use in everyday clinical practice. Given the clinical heterogeneity of AF patients, the available data from trials and real-world studies allow us to fit the right NOAC to the particular patient's characteristics, with the aim of optimizing outcomes for the individual patient. This review article aims to provide a summary of the evidence on the performance of NOACs in AF patients with specific clinical characteristics. Evidence-based suggestions are presented to provide a simple and viable strategy for clinicians for the choice of a particular NOAC. KEY MESSAGE Given the different performance of the new-oral anticoagulants in patients with the different clinical situation, evidence-based choice of fitting the right new-oral anticoagulants to the patients is provided in this review article.

Cardiac implantable electronic device and vascular access: Strategies to overcome problems.

For arrhythmia treatment or sudden cardiac death prevention in hemodialysis patients, there is a frequent need for placement of a cardiac implantable electronic device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device). Leads from a cardiac implantable electronic device can cause central vein stenosis and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation or contribute to infective endocarditis. In patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring vascular access and cardiac implantable electronic device, the best strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral upper limb for a cardiac implantable electronic device and avoidance of central vein catheter. Fortunately, cardiac electrotherapy is moving toward miniaturization and less transvenous wires. Whenever feasible, one should avoid transvenous leads and choose alternative options such as subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, epicardial leads, and leadless pacemaker. Based on recent reports on the leadless pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator effectiveness, in patients with rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (high risk of renal failure) or glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m2, this option should be considered by the implanting cardiologist for future access protection.

Association between transthoracic impedance and electrical cardioversion success with biphasic defibrillators: An analysis of 1055 shocks for atrial fibrillation and flutter.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of transthoracic impedance (TTI) to electrical cardioversion (ECV) success for atrial tachyarrhythmias when using biphasic waveform defibrillators is unknown. HYPOTHESIS: TTI is predictive of ECV success with contemporary defibrillators. METHODS: De-identified data stored in biphasic defibrillator memory cards from ECV attempts for atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) over a 2-year period at our center were evaluated. ECV success, defined as arrhythmia termination and ≥ 1 sinus beat, was adjudicated by 2 blinded cardiac electrophysiologists. The association between TTI and ECV success was assessed via Cochrane-Armitage trend and Spearman rank correlation tests, as well as simple and multivariable logistic regression. The influence of TTI on the number of shocks and on cumulative energy delivered per patient was also examined. RESULTS: 703 patients (593 with AF, 110 with AFL) receiving 1055 shocks were included. Last shock success was achieved in 88.0% and 98.2% of patients with AF and AFL, respectively. In patients with AF, TTI was positively associated with last shock failure (Ptrend =0.019), the need for multiple shocks (Ptrend <0.001), and cumulative energy delivered (ρ = 0.348; P < 0.001). After adjusting for first shock energy, 10-Ω increments in TTI were associated with odds ratios of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.24-1.49) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.09-1.37) for first and last shock failure, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Although contemporary defibrillators are designed to compensate for TTI, this variable continues to be associated with ECV failure in patients with AF. Strategies to lower TTI during ECV for AF may improve procedural success.

Analysis of arrhythmic events is useful to detect lead failure earlier in patients followed by remote monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) has been advocated as the new standard of care for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). RM has allowed the early detection of adverse clinical events, such as arrhythmia, lead failure, and battery depletion. However, lead failure was often identified only by arrhythmic events, but not impedance abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the usefulness of arrhythmic events with conventional impedance abnormalities for identifying lead failure in CIED patients followed by RM. METHODS: CIED patients in 12 hospitals have been followed by the RM center in Okayama University Hospital. All transmitted data have been analyzed and summarized. RESULTS: From April 2009 to March 2016, 1,873 patients have been followed by the RM center. During the mean follow-up period of 775 days, 42 lead failure events (atrial lead 22, right ventricular pacemaker lead 5, implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] lead 15) were detected. The proportion of lead failures detected only by arrhythmic events, which were not detected by conventional impedance abnormalities, was significantly higher than that detected by impedance abnormalities (arrhythmic event 76.2%, 95% CI: 60.5-87.9%; impedance abnormalities 23.8%, 95% CI: 12.1-39.5%). Twenty-seven events (64.7%) were detected without any alert. Of 15 patients with ICD lead failure, none has experienced inappropriate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: RM can detect lead failure earlier, before clinical adverse events. However, CIEDs often diagnose lead failure as just arrhythmic events without any warning. Thus, to detect lead failure earlier, careful human analysis of arrhythmic events is useful.

Electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a call for action.

Current guidelines recommendations, based on the results of primary sudden cardiac death prevention trials, use the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a sole criterion for the indication of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for primary prevention purposes. In this article, we review the sensitivity and specificity of LVEF for predicting arrhythmic vs. non-arrhythmic cardiac death and examine existing evidence on the use of electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of ischaemic patients with reduced left ventricular function.

Automatic remote monitoring utilizing daily transmissions: transmission reliability and implantable cardioverter defibrillator battery longevity in the TRUST trial.

Aims: Benefits of automatic remote home monitoring (HM) among implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients may require high transmission frequency. However, transmission reliability and effects on battery longevity remain uncertain. We hypothesized that HM would have high transmission success permitting punctual guideline based follow-up, and improve battery longevity. This was tested in the prospective randomized TRUST trial. Methods and results: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients were randomized post-implant 2:1 to HM (n = 908) (transmit daily) or to Conventional in-person monitoring [conventional management (CM), n = 431 (HM disabled)]. In both groups, five evaluations were scheduled every 3 months for 15 months. Home Monitoring technology performance was assessed by transmissions received vs. total possible, and number of scheduled HM checks failing because of missed transmissions. Battery longevity was compared in HM vs. CM at 15 months, and again in HM 3 years post-implant using continuously transmitted data. Transmission success per patient was 91% (median follow-up of 434 days). Overall, daily HM transmissions were received in 315 795 of a potential 363 450 days (87%). Only 55/3759 (1.46%) of unsuccessful scheduled evaluations in HM were attributed to transmission loss. Shock frequency and pacing percentage were similar in HM vs. CM. Fifteen month battery longevity was 12% greater in HM (93.2 ± 8.8% vs. 83.5 ± 6.0% CM, P < 0.001). In extended follow-up of HM patients, estimated battery longevity was 50.9 ± 9.1% (median 52%) at 36 months. Conclusion: Automatic remote HM demonstrated robust transmission reliability. Daily transmission load may be sustained without reducing battery longevity. Home Monitoring conserves battery longevity and tracks long term device performance. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00336284.