Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 105
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(4): e0272623, 2024 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415603

RESUMO

Antibiotic resistance is a recognized and concerning public health issue. Gram-negative bacilli, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), are notorious for their rapid development of drug resistance, leading to treatment failures. TanReQing injection (TRQ) was chosen to explore its pharmacological mechanisms against clinical multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PA), given its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. We revealed the expression of proteins and genes in P. aeruginosa after co-culture with TRQ. This study developed an assessment method to evaluate clinical resistance of P. aeruginosa using MALDI-TOF MS identification and Biotyper database searching techniques. Additionally, it combined MIC determination to investigate changes in MDR-PA treated by TRQ. TRQ effectively reduced the MICs of ceftazidime and cefoperazone and enhanced the confidence scores of MDR-PA as identified by mass spectrometry. Using this evaluation method, the fingerprints of standard P. aeruginosa and MDR-PA were compared, and the characteristic peptide sequence (Seq-PA No. 1) associated with flagellum was found. The phenotypic experiments were conducted to confirm the effect of TRQ on the motility and adhesion of P. aeruginosa. A combination of co-immunoprecipitation and proteome analysis was employed, and 16 proteins were significantly differentially expressed and identified as potential candidates for investigating the mechanism of inhibiting resistance in P. aeruginosa treated by TRQ. The candidates were verified by quantitative real-time PCR analysis, and TRQ may affect these core proteins (MexA, MexB, OprM, OprF, OTCase, IDH, and ASL) that influence resistance of P. aeruginosa. The combination of multiple methods helps elucidate the synergistic mechanism of TRQ in overcoming resistance of P. aeruginosa.IMPORTANCEPseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen closely associated with various life-threatening acute and chronic infections. The presence of antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa infections significantly complicates antibiotic treatment. The expression of ß-lactamase, efflux systems such as MexAB-OprM, and outer membrane permeability are considered to have the greatest impact on the sensitivity of P. aeruginosa. The study used a method to assess the clinical resistance of P. aeruginosa using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry identification and Biotyper database search techniques. TanReQing injection (TRQ) effectively reduced the MICs of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR-PA) and improved the confidence scores for co-cultured MDR-PA. The study found a characteristic peptide sequence for distinguishing whether P. aeruginosa is resistant. Through co-immunoprecipitation and proteome analysis, we explored the mechanism of TRQ overcoming resistance of P. aeruginosa.


Assuntos
Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/metabolismo , Cefoperazona/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Proteoma/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/metabolismo , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Peptídeos/farmacologia
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(28): e34284, 2023 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37443505

RESUMO

The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam with piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). The retrospective study was conducted from March 1, 2018 to May 30, 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received either cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of SCAP. A total of 815 SCAP patients were enrolled. Among them, 343 received cefoperazone-sulbactam, and 472 received piperacillin-tazobactam. Patients who received cefoperazone-sulbactam presented with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores. (6.20 ± 2.77 vs 5.72 ± 2.61; P = .009). The clinical cure rates and effectiveness for patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam were 84.2% versus 80.3% (P = .367) and 85.4% versus 83.3% (P = .258), respectively. In addition, the overall mortality rate of the cefoperazone-sulbactam group was 16% (n = 55), which was also comparable to the piperacillin-tazobactam group (17.8%, n = 84, P = .572). The primary clinical outcomes for patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam were superior compared to those receiving piperacillin-tazobactam after adjusting disease severity status. The clinical efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam in the treatment of adult patients with SCAP is comparable to that of piperacillin-tazobactam. After adjusting for disease severity, cefoperazone-sulbactam tended to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Humanos , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 76(3)2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36918199

RESUMO

The prophylactic and therapeutic overuse of antimicrobials on the farm has contributed to the emergence of hard-to-fight bacterial strains causing bovine mastitis. Aiming at alternative therapies, this study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of 20 essential oils against clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains. Of them, five with strong activities were selected and evaluated for their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in culture medium and milk, cytotoxicity against bovine mammary cells (MAC-T), antiadhesive properties, and interactions among themselves and with cefoperazone. The oils remained active on milk, were not cytotoxic, and some concentrations stimulated MAC-T cells growth, suggesting healing potential. Subinhibitory concentrations of Coriandrum sativum, Origanum vulgare, Syzygium aromaticum, and Thymus vulgaris reduced biofilm formation by at least 80%. Several oil and cefoperazone combinations displayed additive interaction, with O. vulgare and C. sativum showing the most promising results. We developed formulations for being used as prophylactic postdipping solutions in the field, containing different concentrations (1% or 3%) of the active oils, alone or in combination, with 3% glycerin, 1% Tween 80, and water. The formulations showed strong antimicrobial activity in milk and enhanced antiadhesive properties, specially when two oils were combined in the formula, indicating promising biotechnological and therapeutical applications.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Mastite Bovina , Óleos Voláteis , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Feminino , Bovinos , Animais , Humanos , Óleos Voláteis/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/veterinária , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Plantas , Condimentos , Medicina Tradicional , Mastite Bovina/tratamento farmacológico , Mastite Bovina/microbiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
4.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(7): 1020-1027, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285526

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sulbactam and sulbactam-containing ß-lactam antibiotics are often used in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii. We aimed to further examine the clinical efficacy of a cefoperazone/sulbactam anti-infective regimen in multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) lung infections. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis among patients with MDRAB lung infection and complete data who were treated at the geriatric intensive care unit of Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020. We collected general information, including age, sex, APACHE II score, anti-infective course, comorbid infections in other sites, other pathogens, cefoperazone/sulbactam regimen and concomitant medications, and adverse reactions. We used microbiological changes before and after treatment to assess microbiological efficacy, defined as microbial eradication and reduction. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 121 patients were included, among which 96 (79.34%) were men and 25 (20.66%) were women. The median age was 76 (interquartile range [IQR] 62.5-83) years, median APACHE II score was 22 (IQR 19-26), and median treatment course was 8 (IQR 5-12.5) days. Among these patients, tigecycline was concomitantly used in 52 patients and the sulbactam dose was increased to 4 g and above in 27 patients. The microbiological efficacy of conventional cefoperazone/sulbactam with/without tigecycline in MDRAB decreased with each consecutive year and a reduction in efficacy was linearly correlated with year, which was both statistically significant (p = 0.039, 0.030, respectively). In 2020, the microbiological efficacy of a higher sulbactam dose combined with tigecycline was 75%, which was a significant improvement over the conventional dose (p = 0.028). The 3-year data showed that the microbiological efficacy of conventional cefoperazone/sulbactam 3 g eight hourly (q8h) without tigecycline was 32% and efficacy increased to 57.9% when the sulbactam dose was increased. Hence, the increased sulbactam dose significantly improved efficacy in MDRAB lung infection (p = 0.049). Different doses of sulbactam combined with tigecycline increased the microbiological efficacy of MDRAB but the differences were not statistically significant. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A cefoperazone/sulbactam-based anti-infective regimen showed some efficacy in MDRAB lung infection, but the microbiological efficacy of a cefoperazone/sulbactam 3 g q8h regimen decreased over time. Increasing the sulbactam dose to 4 g or more can improve efficacy. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)-guided personalized medicine may be a future research direction.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/farmacologia , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Tigeciclina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261264, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34914757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were; (I) to determine the proportion of pathogens isolated from patients with infected chronic wounds in the surgical ward of MRRH that are resistant to the third-generation cephalosporins and (II) to determine the factors associated with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in the surgical ward of MRRH. METHOD(S): This study was a descriptive analytical survey of bacterial isolates from infected chronic wounds among patients admitted in the surgical ward of MRRH, Uganda. Seventy five (75) study participants were recruited in the study using convenient sampling technique. Bacterial culture and identification was performed using standard microbiology laboratory procedures whereas broth microdilution method was used to establish the susceptibility of the identified pathogens. Data for objective one (1) was summarized as proportions while the categorized variables were analyzed using logistic regression to determine whether they were associated with the resistance patterns. The level of significance was preset at 5% and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Generally, all isolates had complete susceptibility (100%) to Cefoperazone+Sulbactam 2g except 7.1% of proteus spp that were resistant. Of all the bacterial isolates studied, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter agglomerans, providencia spp and pseudomonas earuginosa had complete resistance (100%) to Cefopodoxime 200mg while providencia spp and pseudomomas earuginosa had complete resistance (100%) to Cefixime 400mg and cefotaxime 1g. Finally, higher odds of bacterial resistance to more 2 brands of the third generation cephalosporins were observed among participants who had prior exposure to the third generation cephalosporins (OR, 2.22, 95% CI, 0.80-6.14), comorbidities (OR, 1.76, 95% CI, 0.62-4.96) and those who had more than two hospitalizations in a year (OR, 1.39, 95% CI 0.46-4.25). However, multivariate logistic regression was not performed since no factor was significantly associated with resistance to more than two brands of third generation cephalosporins (p >0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found that cefixime and cefpodoixme had high rates of resistance and should not be used in routine management of infected chronic wounds. In addition, the factors investigated in this study were not significantly associated with bacterial resistance to more than two brands of third generation cephalosporins.


Assuntos
Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/fisiologia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefixima/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Ceftizoxima/análogos & derivados , Ceftizoxima/farmacologia , Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Uganda/epidemiologia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/microbiologia , Cefpodoxima
7.
J Postgrad Med ; 67(1): 36-38, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533750

RESUMO

Glyphosate is the most commonly used broad-spectrum, non-selective herbicide in the world. The toxicity is supposed to be due to uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and the surfactant polyoxyethylene amine (POEA)- mediated cardiotoxicity. Clinical features of this herbicide poisoning are varied, ranging from asymptomatic to even death. There is no antidote and aggressive supportive therapy is the mainstay of treatment for glyphosate poisoning. We present a 69-year-old female patient with suicidal consumption of around 500 ml of Glycel®. Initially, gastric lavage was done and intravenous fluids were given. Within two hours of presentation, the patient developed respiratory distress needing intubation, hypotension needing vasopressor support, and severe lactic acidosis. She also developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypokalemia, hypernatremia, and aspiration pneumonia. Our patient was critically ill with multiple poor prognostic factors, but with timely aggressive supportive management, the patient gradually recovered.


Assuntos
Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/intoxicação , Hipernatremia/etiologia , Hipopotassemia/etiologia , Pneumonia Aspirativa/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Idoso , Cefamandol/administração & dosagem , Cefamandol/análogos & derivados , Cefamandol/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/administração & dosagem , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/administração & dosagem , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Glicina/intoxicação , Humanos , Hipernatremia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipopotassemia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Aspirativa/tratamento farmacológico , Potássio/administração & dosagem , Potássio/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Tentativa de Suicídio , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Glifosato
8.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 16, 2021 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461617

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) has been increasingly observed among hospitalized patients. The following study analyzed the epidemiology and microbiological characteristics of MDR-AB, as well as the clinical features, antimicrobial treatments, and outcomes in patients over a six years period in China. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and December 2018. The clinical and microbiological data of all consecutive hospitalized patients with MDR-AB induced bloodstream infection were included and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 108 BSI episodes were analyzed. All MDR isolates belonged to ST2, a sequence type that has spread all over the world. Overall, ST2 strains showed strong biofilm formation ability, high serum resistance, and high pathogenicity. As for the clinical characteristics of the patient, 30-day mortality was 69.4% (75/108). The three main risk factors included mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and thrombocytopenia; three protective factors included a change of antimicrobial regimen within 48 h after positive blood culture, use of the antibacterial agent combination, and more inpatient days. The most effective antibacterial regimen was the combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline. CONCLUSIONS: BSI caused by ST2 A.baumannii represents a difficult challenge for physicians, considering the high mortality associated with this infection. The combination of cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline may be an effective treatment option.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Virulência , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/patogenicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cefoperazona , China/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/microbiologia , Sulbactam , Trombocitopenia , Tigeciclina , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Chemother ; 32(3): 118-123, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32096456

RESUMO

Cefoperazone-sulbactam (CS) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) are used in the treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial infections (NIs). We aimed to compare the effects of these two antibiotics on mortality and treatment success. Patients treated with CS or TZP empirically for at least three days with suspicion of NI were included in this retrospective study. In total, 308 (154 patients in both treatment arms) patients were analyzed. Treatment success rate in CS and TZP group respectively (50% vs 51.2%, p = 0.18), 28-day mortality rate (46.1% vs 42.8%, p = 0.56) and antibiotic-related side effects (50.6% vs 46.1%, p = 0.42) were similar except prolonged prothrombin time (19.4% vs 6.4%; p = 0.001). According to this study results, CS and TZP have equal effectivity and safety for the empirical treatment of Gram-negative NIs. CS may be an appropriate alternative to TZP for antibiotic cycling or mixing strategy to reduce antibiotic resistance.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Cefoperazona/administração & dosagem , Cefoperazona/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/administração & dosagem , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Sulbactam/efeitos adversos
10.
mSphere ; 5(1)2020 01 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915217

RESUMO

Dietary fiber provides a variety of microbiota-mediated benefits ranging from anti-inflammatory metabolites to pathogen colonization resistance. A healthy gut microbiota protects against Clostridioides difficile colonization. Manipulation of these microbes through diet may increase colonization resistance to improve clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to identify how the dietary fiber xanthan gum affects the microbiota and C. difficile colonization. We added 5% xanthan gum to the diet of C57BL/6 mice and examined its effect on the microbiota through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and short-chain fatty acid analysis. Following either cefoperazone or an antibiotic cocktail administration, we challenged mice with C. difficile and measured colonization by monitoring the CFU. Xanthan gum administration is associated with increases in fiber-degrading taxa and short-chain fatty acid concentrations. However, by maintaining both the diversity and absolute abundance of the microbiota during antibiotic treatment, the protective effects of xanthan gum administration on the microbiota were more prominent than the enrichment of these fiber-degrading taxa. As a result, mice that were on the xanthan gum diet experienced limited to no C. difficile colonization. Xanthan gum administration alters mouse susceptibility to C. difficile colonization by maintaining the microbiota during antibiotic treatment. While antibiotic-xanthan gum interactions are not well understood, xanthan gum has previously been used to bind drugs and alter their pharmacokinetics. Thus, xanthan gum may alter the activity of the oral antibiotics used to make the microbiota susceptible. Future research should further characterize how this and other common dietary fibers interact with drugs.IMPORTANCE A healthy gut bacterial community benefits the host by breaking down dietary nutrients and protecting against pathogens. Clostridioides difficile capitalizes on the absence of this community to cause diarrhea and inflammation. Thus, a major clinical goal is to find ways to increase resistance to C. difficile colonization by either supplementing with bacteria that promote resistance or a diet to enrich for those already present in the gut. In this study, we describe an interaction between xanthan gum, a human dietary additive, and the microbiota resulting in an altered gut environment that is protective against C. difficile colonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Fibras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos dos fármacos , Polissacarídeos Bacterianos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Organismos Livres de Patógenos Específicos
11.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 69(3): 198-203, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236975

RESUMO

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is related to nosocomial infections, and it tends to become resistant during or after antimicrobial treatment. The ability to develop carbapenems resistance makes it difficult to treat. P. aeruginosa infections are often associated with high mortality, morbidity and treatment costs. A group of Chinese experts drafted a consensus for treatment of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (XDR-GNB) including extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (XDR-PA). In this study, we studied the antibacterial activities of different antibiotic combinations against six carbapenems-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) strains in vitro, and the results indicated that the combination of ceftazidime with cefoperazone-sulbatam was the best combination with excellent synergistic rate (100%). Besides, some combinations exhibited better effects than using antibiotics alone, reducing the MICs of both drugs significantly, such as ceftazidime/piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftazidime/aztreonam etc. However, there are also some combinations that showed no additional or synergistic effects, suggesting that not all combinations recommended by the guideline have the same effect against resistant P. aeruginosa. Our study screened out some effective combinations against six CRPA strains which might help to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance through improving antibiotic effectiveness. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study measured the synergistic interactions between various antibiotics in vitro recommended by Chinese consensus statement against carbapenems-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results of this study provide valuable evidence that some combinations may be a promising option for clinical treatment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Aztreonam/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , China , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico
12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30886705

RESUMO

Background: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (CRAB-BSI). Methods: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. Results: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; P = 0.001]. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy exerted a protective effect on the prognosis of patients [hazard ratio 0.566, 95% confidence interval (0.342-0.940); P = 0.028]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy was lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (22.2% vs. 40%; P = 0.074). However, the mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin was significantly lower than that of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy (P = 0.048). Conclusions: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos , Cefoperazona/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulbactam/farmacologia , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Análise de Sobrevida , Tigeciclina/farmacologia , Tigeciclina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 18: 47-51, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710647

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Macrolides are the recommended antibiotics for treating pertussis and preventing transmission. The causative bacterium, Bordetella pertussis, has high macrolide resistance and has recently circulated in China. The objective of this study was to find effective alternative antibiotics for treatment by assessing the in vitro activity and clinical efficacy of antibiotics against Bordetella pertussis. METHODS: Bordetella pertussis was confirmed by agglutination with specific antisera and mass spectrometry. The MICs of antibiotics against isolates were determined using the Etest method. Treatment outcomes were clinically and microbiologically evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 126 pertussis patients were diagnosed based on culture, 69.8% of whom were aged ≤6 months and 72.1% were treated with previous macrolides. Leucocytosis and lymphocytosis were observed in 29.4% and 54.8% of all patients, respectively. Both MIC50 and MIC90 of erythromycin, azithromycin, and clindamycin were >256mg/L, and 75.4% were highly macrolide resistant. The MIC90 of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone and cefoperazone-sulbactam were 0.38mg/L, 0.25mg/L, 0.19mg/L, 12mg/L, 0.19mg/L and 0.047mg/L, respectively. The MICs of piperacillin in all of the isolations were <0.016mg/L. Of the patients treated with single cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam, 30 of 32 (93.8%) had significantly improved clinical symptoms and 24 of 25 (96%) had negative culture results after 2 weeks of therapy. CONCLUSION: Macrolide resistance in Bordetella pertussis is a serious problem in Zhejiang Province, China. Piperacillin/piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam have potent antibacterial activity in vitro and in vivo, and may become the alternative choice for treating pertussis caused by macrolide-resistant isolates.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bordetella pertussis/efeitos dos fármacos , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Coqueluche/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Cefoperazona/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/farmacologia , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Sulbactam/farmacologia , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(11): 3176-3180, 2018 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099554

RESUMO

Objectives: Carbapenems are widely recommended for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL producers however, non-carbapenem ß-lactams such as ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) deserve consideration for the treatment of ESBL infections. Cefoperazone/sulbactam is one of the most commonly used BLBLIs in China; however, few outcome studies have been reported. In this study, we evaluated and compared the clinical efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam with that of a carbapenem in the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: Patients with monomicrobial ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae BSIs empirically treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam or a carbapenem were included. Outcomes of interest were clinical response and 14 day mortality. To make a comparison of the efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam and a carbapenem more accurate, propensity score analysis was performed. Results: No statistically significant differences in success rates or 14 day mortality were found between the cefoperazone/sulbactam (n = 17) and carbapenem (n = 46) groups. In the propensity score analysis with 17 case-control pairs, the success rate in the cefoperazone/sulbactam group (70.6%, 12/17) was lower than that in the carbapenem group (94.1%, 16/17), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.175). Sepsis-related mortality and 14 day mortality rates did not significantly differ either (P = 1.000 for both). In the cefoperazone/sulbactam group, 66.7% (2/3) of the patients with a Pitt bacteraemia score ≥5 died within 14 days, whereas none (0/14) of the patients with a Pitt bacteraemia score <5 died within 14 days (P = 0.022). Conclusions: This study showed that cefoperazone/sulbactam had a lower success rate and a higher 14 day mortality rate compared with carbapenems, although the differences were not statistically significant because of the small patient numbers. Further evaluation of cefoperazone/sulbactam is needed.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
15.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 36(1): 127-130, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735843

RESUMO

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel antimicrobial agent with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other common Gram-negative pathogens. In this study, we determined the antimicrobial susceptibility for a total of 149 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa for the most commonly used antimicrobials including the new agent ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). Broth microdilution was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration against various antimicrobials including C/T. Among the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor, overall susceptibility was 67%, 55% and 51% for C/T, Piperacillin/Tazobactam (P/T) and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, respectively. The variations in the susceptibility rates were noted among the three different ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors. Interestingly, 33% susceptibility was noted for C/T against isolates that were resistant to P/T, indicating the higher activity of C/T. This finding suggests about 33% of the P/T-resistant isolates can still be treated effectively with C/T. C/T could be a better alternative for the treatment of ESBL-producing organism, and thereby usage of higher antimicrobials can be minimised.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Índia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Tazobactam , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 56(3): 120-129, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29319497

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the effect of high-dose cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with tigecycline against ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii(XDR-AB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 patients with VAP due to XDR-AB infection were randomized into two groups: the TIG group (received tigecycline injection) and the TIG+CFS group (received tigecycline and cefoperazone-sulbactam (1 : 1) injection). Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used for genotyping the isolated XDR-AB. The microdilution method was used to test the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefoperazone-sulbactam or tigecycline in vitro and the combined effect was determined with the checkerboard method. RESULTS: The total combined effectiveness rate (including all patients who demonstrated an improved condition) was significantly higher in the TIG+CFS group (85.7%) compared with the TIG group (47.6%) (p = 0.010). No significant differences were noted with regard to the adverse reactions between the two groups. The 42 isolated XDR-AB strains were classified into four types. The MIC of the two drugs in combination was significantly lower than that of each drug used alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: High dose of cefoperazone-sulbactam can improve the antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against XDR-AB.
.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Minociclina/análogos & derivados , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Cefoperazona/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minociclina/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sulbactam/administração & dosagem , Tigeciclina , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Transplant Proc ; 48(6): 2130-4, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27569958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, time of onset, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection after liver transplantation (LT) and to investigate the drug resistance of P aeruginosa to frequently used antibiotics to provide evidence for clinical prevention and therapy. METHODS: Patients undergoing LT from January 1, 2003, through June 30, 2015, were considered. We determined the site of infection and the drug susceptibility of P aeruginosa isolates and collected these patients' data to confirm post-LT clinical and laboratory characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients who underwent cadaveric LT, 15 (5.0%) developed 20 episodes of P aeruginosa infection. All episodes of P aeruginosa infection were early-onset, with the bloodstream being the most common source of infection. The majority (86.7%) of these recipients were in intensive care unit stay, and 7 (46.7%) patients had a body temperature of ≥38°C at the onset of infection and an inappropriate antibiotic therapy. In 14 (93.3%) patients, P aeruginosa infection was nosocomial infection. Platelet numbers of <50 × 10(9)/L and lymphocyte count of <300/mm(3) developed in 33.3% and 46.7% of patients, respectively. Seven (46.7%) deaths were attributable to P aeruginosa infection. Of these 20 P aeruginosa isolates, 10 (50%) each were carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant. P aeruginosa was relatively susceptible to amikacin, levofloxacin, or cefoperazone-sulbactam (resistance rate, 30%). CONCLUSIONS: The bloodstream was the most common site of infection; a high body temperature, nosocomial origin, decreased platelet and lymphocyte count occurring in the early period after LT, high antibiotic resistance rate, and high morbidity and mortality rates were the main characteristics of P aeruginosa infection.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Fígado , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Amicacina , Cefoperazona , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Levofloxacino , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/etiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulbactam , Adulto Jovem
18.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 234: 60-64, 2016 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391222

RESUMO

The performance of different isolation methods was evaluated for the detection of Campylobacter from naturally contaminated raw poultry meat. Therefore, fresh and frozen poultry meat samples were analysed using the standard procedure (ISO 10272-1:2006), enrichment in Preston broth, and enrichment in modified Bolton broth (supplemented with (i) potassium clavulanate (C-BB), (ii) triclosan (T-BB), (iii) polymyxin B (P-BB)). The enrichment cultures were streaked onto both modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and RAPID'Campylobacter agar (RCA). Moreover, direct plating on mCCDA and RCA was performed to quantify Campylobacter. In total, 33 out of 59 fresh retail meat samples (55.9%) were Campylobacter positive. For both fresh and frozen poultry meat samples, enrichment in Bolton broth (ISO 10272-1:2006) resulted in a higher number of positive samples than enrichment in Preston broth. Supplementation of Bolton broth with potassium clavulanate (C-BB) and triclosan (T-BB) enhanced the Campylobacter recovery from fresh poultry meat compared to non-supplemented Bolton broth, although the use of C-BB was less applicable than T-BB for Campylobacter recovery from frozen samples. Additionally, the use of RCA resulted in a higher isolation rate compared to mCCDA. The present study demonstrates the impact of culture medium on the recovery of Campylobacter from fresh and frozen naturally contaminated poultry meat samples and can support laboratories in choosing the most appropriate culturing method to detect Campylobacter.


Assuntos
Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Galinhas/microbiologia , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Carne/microbiologia , Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Animais , Cefoperazona , Ácido Clavulânico/farmacologia , Meios de Cultura , Congelamento , Polimixina B , Triclosan/farmacologia
19.
J Food Sci ; 79(5): M923-6, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24787901

RESUMO

Potassium-clavulanate-supplemented modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (C-mCCDA) that was described in our previous study was compared with original mCCDA for the enumeration of Campylobacter in pure culture and chicken carcass rinse. The quantitative detection of viable Campylobacter cells from a pure culture, plated on C-mCCDA, is statistically similar (P > 0.05) to mCCDA. In total, 120 chickens were rinsed using 400 mL buffered peptone water. The rinses were inoculated onto C-mCCDA and mCCDA followed by incubation at 42 °C for 48 h. There was no statistical difference between C-mCCDA (45 of 120 plates; mean count, 145.5 CFU/mL) and normal mCCDA (46 of 120 plates; mean count, 160.8 CFU/mL) in the isolation rate and recovery of Campylobacter (P > 0.05) from chicken carcass rinse. The Pearson correlation coefficient value for the number of Campylobacter cells recovered in the 2 media was 0.942. However, the selectivity was much better on C-mCCDA than on mCCDA plates (P < 0.05). Significantly fewer C-mCCDA plates (33 out of 120 plates; mean count, 1.9 CFU/mL) were contaminated with non-Campylobacter cells than the normal mCCDA plates (67 out of 120 plates; mean count, 27.1 CFU/mL). The C-mCCDA may provide improved results for enumeration of Campylobacter in chicken meat alternative to mCCDA with its increased selectivity the modified agar possess.


Assuntos
Ágar/química , Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Ácido Clavulânico , Meios de Cultura/química , Microbiologia de Alimentos/métodos , Carne/microbiologia , Potássio , Animais , Cefoperazona , Carvão Vegetal , Galinhas , Ácido Desoxicólico
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 23: 90-3, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii has been reported increasingly as a significant causative organism of various nosocomial infections, including hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of HAP induced by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) in elderly patients and the in vitro antimicrobial effects of cefoperazone/sulbactam combination therapy. METHODS: Seventy-one elderly patients in the geriatric ward of the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army (PLAGH) with CRAB-induced HAP were analyzed retrospectively. The checkerboard method was used to determine the in vitro drug sensitivity of 60 CRAB strains to antimicrobial combinations (cefoperazone/sulbactam with meropenem, minocycline, or levofloxacin). The occurrence of carbapenemase genes was detected by PCR. RESULTS: CRAB-induced HAP occurred mostly in patients with underlying diseases. Prior to onset, most patients had received antimicrobial therapies including broad-spectrum ß-lactams, invasive mechanical ventilation, and catheterization. The 30-day survival rate was 95.1% in patients using cefoperazone/sulbactam, with or without combination with antimicrobial drugs, and 73.3% in patients not using cefoperazone/sulbactam (p<0.05). When cefoperazone/sulbactam was used in combination with minocycline, levofloxacin, and meropenem, minimum inhibitory concentrations MIC50 and MIC90 were reduced for each drug. The genes OXA-23 and OXA-51 were amplified in 96.7% of the strains, but the genes OXA-24, OXA-58, SIM, VIM, and IMP were not amplified. CONCLUSIONS: CRAB-induced HAP occurred mostly in patients with anemia or decreased levels of serum albumin, but with elevated levels of C-reactive protein and creatinine. Cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with minocycline, meropenem, and levofloxacin had a synergistic and additive in vitro bacteriostatic action on CRAB.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Cefoperazona/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Sulbactam/uso terapêutico , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Meropeném , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tienamicinas/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA