Beneficial herb-drug interaction of rhein in Jinhongtang and Imipenem/Cilastatin mediated by organic anion transporters.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Jinhongtang as a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, has been widely used as a clinical adjuvant in the treatment of acute abdominal diseases and sepsis. Clinical benefits of the concurrent use of Jinhongtang and antibiotics have been observed, however, the mechanism has not been fully understood. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aimed to explore the effect of Jinhongtang on the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and to clarify the underlying mechanism of herb-drug interaction (HDI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mouse model of sepsis induced by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was used to evaluate the pharmacodynamic interaction in vivo. In vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin was studied by determining minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC). Pharmacokinetic interaction was investigated by pharmacokinetic studies in rats and uptake assays using OAT1/3-HEK293 cells. The main constituents ingested into blood of rats were qualitatively identified by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS. RESULTS: Mice treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin and Jinhongtang exhibited higher survival rate, lower bacteria load and less inflammation in blood and lung tissues, compared with those treated by Imipenem/Cilastatin alone after injection of S. aureus. However, MIC and MBC of Imipenem/Cilastatin against S. aureus in vitro were not significantly changed in the presence of Jinhongtang. On the contrary, Jinhongtang increased the plasma concentration of Imipenem and decreased its urinary excretion in rats. CLr of Imipenem was reduced by 58.5%, while its half-life (t1/2) was prolonged for approximate 1.2 times after coadministered Jinhongtang. Furthermore, the extracts of Jinhongtang, single herb in the prescription, and main absorbable constituents inhibited cellular uptake of probe substrates and Imipenem by OAT1/3-HEK293 cells to different extents. Among them, rhein exhibited the strongest inhibition capacity with IC50 values of 0.08 ± 0.01 µM (OAT1) and 2.86 ± 0.28 µM (OAT3). Moreover, coadministration of rhein also significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of Jinhongtang enhanced antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin in sepsis mice induced by S. aureus through reducing renal elimination of Imipenem via inhibition of OATs. Our investigation provided the insight of Jinhongtang as an effective supplement to enhance the antibacterial activity of Imipenem/Cilastatin and can be useful for future clinical studies.

Evaluating imipenem + cilastatin + relebactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

INTRODUCTION: The addition of the ß-lactamase inhibitor relebactam to imipenem restores the antibacterial activity against the majority of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are predominantly caused by Gram-negative uropathogens. The rise in antibiotic resistance, including to carbapenems, is an increasing challenge in daily practice. AREAS COVERED: In the current review, the use of imipenem/relebactam in complicated UTI is evaluated by discussing its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/dynamics, microbiology, safety, and clinical efficacy. The authors also provide their expert perspectives onto its use and its future place in the treatment armamentarium. EXPERT OPINION: With respect to complicated UTI, it should be noted that, to our knowledge, there are no data yet upon the clinical efficacy of imipenem/relebactam in patients with severe urosepsis or men with suspected prostatitis. Further studies upon these specific groups of UTI patients are needed including additional pharmacokinetic studies upon its tissue penetration of the prostate which is currently unknown. However, in our opinion, imipenem/relebactam can be used in complicated UTI when other treatment options are limited.

Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: A Novel ß-Lactam-ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.

Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL) is a novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs). Relebactam is a ß-lactamase inhibitor with the ability to inhibit a broad spectrum of ß-lactamases such as class A and class C ß-lactamases, including carbapenemases. The addition of relebactam to imipenem restores imipenem activity against several imipenem-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical data demonstrate that IMI-REL is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of cUTIs and cIAIs due to imipenem-resistant bacteria. In a phase III trial comparing IMI-REL with imipenem plus colistin, favorable clinical response was achieved in 71% and 70% of patients, respectively. Available clinical and pharmacokinetic data support the approved dosage of a 30-minute infusion of imipenem 500 mg-cilastatin 500 mg-relebactam 250 mg every 6 hours, along with dosage adjustments based on renal function. In this review, we describe the chemistry, mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this new agent. The approval of IMI-REL represents another important step in the ongoing fight against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

In Vivo Efficacy of Relebactam (MK-7655) in Combination with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Murine Infection Models.

The World Health Organization has identified antimicrobial resistance as a global public health threat since the prevalence and spread of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens worldwide are staggering. Carbapenems, such as imipenem and meropenem, have been used to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria; however, since the development of resistance to carbapenems, ß-lactam antibiotics in combination with ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) has been one of the most successful strategies to enhance the activity of ß-lactam antibiotics. Relebactam (REL) is a new BLI which has been found to inhibit class A and class C ß-lactamases in vitro REL has been reported to restore imipenem's activity against both imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae Reported here are the in vivo efficacy studies of the imipenem-cilastatin (IMI)-REL combination in mouse models of disseminated and pulmonary infection caused by imipenem-resistant clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae The combination was also evaluated in a P. aeruginosa delayed pulmonary model of infection. IMI-REL was found to be effective in the disseminated model of infection with log reduction in P. aeruginosa CFU of 3.73, 3.13, and 1.72 at REL doses of 40, 20, and 10 mg/kg, respectively. For K. pneumoniae, log reductions in CFU of 2.36, 3.06, and 2.29 were reported at REL doses of 80, 40, and 20 mg/kg, respectively. The combination was less effective in the delayed pulmonary model than in the immediate pulmonary model; however, overall REL was found to be effective against these imipenem-resistant strains.

Impact of tigecycline versus imipenem-cilastatin on fibrinogen levels following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a randomized-controlled study.

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the effects of tigecycline and imipenem-cilastatin on fibrinogen levels in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Patients were empirically randomized to receive tigecycline or imipenem-cilastatin. Fibrinogen levels were measured in both patient groups on days 1, 3, 5 and 8 of antibiotic therapy and 3 days after antibiotic therapy completion. Twenty patients received tigecycline and 22 patients received imipenem-cilastatin . Patients in the tigecycline group had lower mean fibrinogen levels compared to those in the imipenem-cilastatin group on day 3 (4.1 ± 1.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.3 g/L; p < 0.001), day 5 (3.7 ± 1.2 vs. 6.5 ± 1.1 g/L; p < 0.001), day 8 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.8 ± 1.6 g/L; p < 0.001), and day 3 after antibiotic completion (4.1 ± 1.4 vs. 6.1 ± 1.6 g/L; p < 0.001). In conclusion, compared to imipenem-cilastatin, tigecycline was associated with a significant decrease in fibrinogen levels, following CRS and HIPEC.

Effect of elevated imipenem/cilastatin minimum inhibitory concentrations on patient outcomes in Gram-negative bloodstream infections.

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) are known to predict outcomes for patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia. However, limited data exist on how MICs influence such outcomes when organisms are classified as carbapenem-resistant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing imipenem/cilastatin MICs on mortality in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: Patients with an imipenem/cilastatin-resistant (MIC>4mg/L) monomicrobial Gram-negative BSI were eligible for inclusion in the study and were assessed for baseline characteristics, organ function, microbiological data, timing and type of therapeutic treatment, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with imipenem/cilastatin-resistant bacterial isolates (MIC>4mg/L) were retrospectively studied. Time to event analyses found no difference between patients who received carbapenem therapy and those who did not (P=0.10). After adjustment, patients receiving directed therapy were less likely to die (adjusted hazard ratio=0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.83; P<0.01), whereas higher modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and days to positive culture were associated with non-survival. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate a relationship between receipt of a carbapenem and mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BSI.

Cisplatin-induced renal inflammation is ameliorated by cilastatin nephroprotection.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a potent chemotherapeutic drug whose nephrotoxic effect is a major complication and a dose-limiting factor for antitumoral therapy. There is much evidence that inflammation contributes to the pathogenesis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. We found that cilastatin, a renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor, has protective effects in vitro and in vivo against cisplatin-induced renal damage by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidation. Here, we investigated the potential use of cilastatin to protect against cisplatin-induced kidney injury and inflammation in rats. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control, cilastatin-control, cisplatin and cilastatin-cisplatin. Nephrotoxicity was assessed 5 days after administration of cisplatin based on blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1 and renal morphology. Inflammation was measured using the electrophoretic mobility shift assay, immunohistochemical studies and evaluation of inflammatory mediators. RESULTS: Compared with the control rats, cisplatin-administered rats were affected by significant proximal tubule damage, decreased GFR, increased production of inflammatory mediators and elevations in urea, creatinine and tissue KIM-1 levels. Cilastatin prevented these changes in renal function and ameliorated histological damage in cisplatin-administered animals. Cilastatin also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, activation of nuclear factor-κB and CD68-positive cell concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Cilastatin reduces cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, which is associated with decreased inflammation in vivo. Although the exact role of decreased inflammation in nephroprotection has not been fully elucidated, treatment with cilastatin could be a novel strategy for the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury.

Successful Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Caused by Multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Producing New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase (NDM-1) With Strains Genotyping.

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) strains have recently become a new threat in kidney transplant recipients due to the strains' resistance to almost all antibiotics, including carbapenems. METHODS: We present a case series of 3 patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by multiresistant K pneumoniae NDM-1 strains who were treated with the same protocol. Genotyping sequencing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed in all cases. RESULTS: All patients were male and had undergone kidney transplantation 4, 7, and 8 months, respectively, before the admission. Combined antibiotic therapy consisting of imipenem/cilastatin in maximal doses, gentamicin and/or colistin for 21 to 27 days, followed by oral fosfomycin, was used in all cases. There were no further UTI episodes in 2 patients at the 12-month visit. Three months after initial treatment, the third patient presented with leukocyturia with no clinical symptoms and a urine culture positive for K pneumonia NDM-1 strain. Interestingly, the strain was susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole despite resistance in previous urine culture samples. The patient was successfully treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 2 × 960 mg/d for 3 weeks followed by 480 mg/d and 3 doses of fosfomycin. Genotyping sequencing revealed identical DNA restriction fragments in bacterial strains from 2 patients. In the third case, although a difference in 2 restriction fragments was observed, the strain was considered related to the others. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of UTI caused by K pneumoniae NDM-1 strains, prolong combined treatment followed by oral fosfomycin prophylaxis can be successful. Strain genotyping should be performed to optimize further treatment protocols in such cases.

[Invasive Campylobacter jejuni/coli Infections: 9 Case Reports at a Single Center between 2000 and 2015, and a Review of Literature Describing Japanese Patients].

There have been few coherent reports on extraintestinal infection or bacteremia caused by Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) or C. coli in Japan. To clarify the clinical and microbiological characteristics of invasive infections caused by these two species, we retrospectively analyzed the records of patients from whom these pathogens had been isolated from sterile sites between 2000 and 2015. During this study period, we identified 9 patients. The clinical syndrome of all of these patients was bacteremia. Three patients had underlying diseases with both liver cirrhosis and malignant neoplasm, and all of these patients were aged 60 years or older. The remaining 6 patients were immunocompetent and younger than 40 years of age. All 9 patients had a fever of 38.5 degrees C or higher. The proportion of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms was lower for the 3 patients with underlying diseases, compared with the 6 patients without underlying diseases (1/3 cases vs, 4/6 cases). Of the 8 strains evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility, all were susceptible to imipenem/cilastatin, kanamycin and erythromycin, and 2 were resistant to levofloxacin. Antimicrobial treatment was administered to 8 patients, but one spontaneously recovered without any treatment. We were able to follow the outcomes of 8 patients, and all of these patients completely recovered without relapses. We also reviewed 14 Japanese patients reported in the Japanese and English literature and found similar clinical features consisting of a high-grade fever and an association with underlying diseases and gastrointestinal symptoms. Of note, 3 agammaglobulinemic patients presented with bacteremia and extraintestinal infections and had multiple relapses. Based on the findings of our 9 cases and previous reports, the affected patients were divided into two groups according to clinical syndrome and therapeutic intervention. One group consisted of previously healthy children or young adults showing bacteremia. Most of them had enterocolitis complications but had a good prognosis. The other group consisted of patients with underlying diseases or elderly patients who presented with bacteremia alone or bacteremia with extraintestinal infections. The latter group, especially among those with humoral immunodeficiency, should be parentally treated with antimicrobial agents and requires careful monitoring for relapse. This is the largest case series study to examine invasive C. jejuni/coli infections in Japan, and it provides important epidemiological information on this rare infection.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy between tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem and sulbactam plus imipenem against ventilator-associated pneumonia with pneumonic extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia, and correlation of clinical efficacy with in vitro synergy tests.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy between salvage antimicrobial regimen consisting of tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin (TIC) and regimen of sulbactam plus imipenem/cilastatin (SIC) for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and pneumonic bacteremia due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) isolates, and determine the correlation of results of in vitro tigecycline-imipenem synergy test with clinical efficacy. METHODS: The comparative survey was conducted at a medical center in Taiwan in 2013. Patients comprising the TIC group (n = 28) received tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem/cilastatin following unresponsiveness to 3-day sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, and those in the SIC group (n = 56) received sulbactam-imipenem/cilastatin throughout the course. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to explore 30-day case-fatality independent predictors. Additionally, the checkerboard test and time-kill analysis were performed for the bloodstream XDR-Ab isolates from patients in the TIC group, and molecular characterization was done for the bloodstream XDR-Ab strains of all patients. RESULTS: We found that the TIC scheme has a significant benefit on improving patients' survival status (the mortality rate of TIC and SIC group patients was 14.3% and 64.3%, respectively), corresponding well with in vitro synergy or additivity results by the checkerboard test. Twenty TIC group cases had monomicrobial XDR-Ab cultured from tracheal aspirates after 10 days of tigecycline-imipenem/cilastatin therapy, but none developed subsequent pneumonia. However, breakthrough primary Burkholderia cepacia (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1) bacteremias were attributed to four TIC case fatalities. Shock, SIC regimen usage, and development of breakthrough bacteremia were independent predictors of 30-day in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the TIC regimen showed good efficacy, its value regarding managing XDR-Ab ventilator-associated pneumonia bacteremia needs further evaluation.

Postcesarean section wound infection caused by Mycobacterium massiliense.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense (a subspecies of the M. abscessus complex) is a rare causative agent of surgical site infection after cesarean section (C section). We tried to seek the common source of infection and unravel the optimal treatment modalities. METHODS: From September 2009 to October 2012, four postpartum women developed C-section wound infections caused by M. massiliense. Speciation of the four isolates was identified using of hsp65, rpoB, and secA1 partial gene sequencing and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The erm(41) and rrl genes were detected for the possibility of inducible macrolide resistance. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used as a tool of molecular epidemiology. All patients underwent intensive intravenous and oral antimycobacterial regimens. Of these patients, three underwent debridement at least once. RESULTS: All four isolates were identified as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. All of the isolates harbored a truncated erm(41) gene without rrl gene mutations, which explains the susceptibility to clarithromycin and azithromycin. Three isolates were indistinguishable by DNA strain typing, and the fourth strain was clonal with the other three strains. Their infections were not improved in spite of teicoplanin treatment initially. These patients underwent antimycobacterial regimens with/without surgery and were all cured. DISCUSSION: Teicoplanin treatment failure, painful cutaneous nodules, and persistent wound drainage alerted us to the possibility of nontuberculous mycobacterial skin and soft tissue infection. Accurate identification of subspecies, detection of drug resistance genes, susceptibility testing, and optimal antimycobacterial agents with/without surgical debridement are warranted for successful treatment.

Identification of ACT-1 Plasmid-Mediated AmpC beta-Lactamase Producing Citrobacter freundii from a Chinese Patient

No abstract available.

Comparison of tigecycline with imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

To compare efficacy and safety of a tigecycline regimen with an imipenem/cilastatin regimen in hospital-acquired pneumonia patients, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, study evaluated 945 patients. Coprimary end points were clinical response in clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) populations at test-of-cure. Cure rates were 67.9% for tigecycline and 78.2% for imipenem (CE patients) and 62.7% and 67.6% (c-mITT patients), respectively. A statistical interaction occurred between ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-VAP subgroups, with significantly lower cure rates in tigecycline VAP patients compared to imipenem; in non-VAP patients, tigecycline was noninferior to imipenem. Overall mortality did not differ between the tigecycline (14.1%) and imipenem regimens (12.2%), although more deaths occurred in VAP patients treated with tigecycline than imipenem. Overall, the tigecycline regimen was noninferior to the imipenem/cilastatin regimen for the c-mITT but not the CE population; this difference appears to have been driven by results in VAP patients.

Empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy with an aggressive de-escalation strategy does not induce gram-negative pathogen resistance in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Early, empiric, broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific therapy is the standard of care for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In our surgical intensive care unit (SICU), imipenem-cilastatin (I-C) in combination with tobramycin (TOB) or levofloxacin (LEV) has been used until quantitative bronchoalveolar lavage results are finalized, at which time de-escalation occurs to pathogen-specific agents. With this practice, however, alterations in antimicrobial resistance remain a concern. Our hypothesis was that this strict regimen does not alter antimicrobial susceptibility of common gram-negative VAP pathogens in our SICU. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review of SICU-specific antibiograms was performed for the sensitivities of common gram-negative VAP pathogens. Time periods were defined as early (January-June 2005) and late (July-December 2006). Chart review of empiric and de-escalation antibiotic usage was obtained. Data were collated, and statistical significance was assessed with the chi-square test using the on-line Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis tool. RESULTS: Imipenem-cilastatin was used 198 times for empiric VAP coverage (811 patient-days), whereas TOB and LEV were given a total of 149 (564 patient-days) and 61 (320 patient-days) times, respectively. Collectively, the susceptibility of gram-negative organisms to I-C did not change (early 91.4%; late 97%; p = 0.33). Individually, non-significant trends to greater sensitivity to I-C were noted for both Pseudomonas aeruginosa (early 85.7%; late 90.9%; p = 0.73) and Acinetobacter baumannii (early 80%; late 100%; p = 0.13). Further, both TOB (early 77.1%; late 70.0%; p = 0.49) and LEV (early 74.3%; late 70.0%; p = 0.67) were found to maintain their susceptibility profiles. The frequency of resistant gram-positive VAPs was unchanged during the study period. Our de-escalation compliance (by 96 h) was 78% for I-C, 77.2% for TOB, and 59% for LEV. When infections requiring I-C were removed from the analysis, de-escalation compliance was improved to 92%. CONCLUSIONS: In our SICU, early, empiric broad-spectrum VAP therapy followed by de-escalation to pathogen-specific agents did not alter antimicrobial resistance and is a valid practice. Further, our compliance with de-escalation practices was higher than published rates.

The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections - the European experience.

The polymicrobial nature of complicated intra-abdominal infections makes these infections particularly challenging to treat. The initial selection of antimicrobial therapy is therefore extremely important. Inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy has been shown to delay clinical resolution, increase length of hospital stay, and increase the risk of mortality. In addition, the increasing frequency with which resistant isolates (e.g., extended spectrum beta-lactamases [ESBLs]) are recovered from patients mandates that empiric antimicrobial therapy covers these difficult-to-treat organisms. Here, we assessed the efficacy of a new antimicrobial agent, tigecycline. This is a combined analysis of data from the European sites that participated in two Phase III, double-blind trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tigecycline, versus that of imipenem/cilastatin, in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Patients received either tigecycline (initial dose of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously every 12 hours) or imipenem/cilastatin (500/500 mg intravenously every 6 hours) for 5-14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-44 days after therapy) in the co-primary microbiologically evaluable (ME) and microbiological modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) populations. For the ME group, clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 92.4% (219/237) for tigecycline versus 88.8% (198/223) for imipenem/cilastatin (95% CI = -2.2, 9.4). Clinical cure rates for the mmITT populations were 87.3% (247/283) for tigecycline versus 83.5% (228/273) for imipenem/cilastatin (95% CI = -2.5, 10.0) at the test-of-cure visit. Pretherapy in vitro activity against baseline isolates for tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin were also determined. The mean MIC(90) for tigecycline against the most commonly isolated aerobes and anaerobes was < or =2.0 microg/mL. No pretherapy isolates displayed resistance to tigecycline based on the breakpoints used. Bacterial susceptibilities to tigecycline appeared to be consistent with clinical responses. Most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events for tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin were nausea (14.7% and 11.8%, respectively, p = 0.267) and vomiting (10.7% and 7.3%, respectively p = 0.146). This combined analysis demonstrates that tigecycline is safe and effective for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, and reflects the findings of the global population.

Combination carbapenem-sulbactam therapy for critically ill patients with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia: four case reports and an in vitro combination synergy study.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii have become a therapeutic challenge for clinicians worldwide. Although colistin and tigecycline have been successful in treating patients with these infections, these agents are not available on a worldwide basis. We describe four critically ill patients in Taiwan who were diagnosed with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. All bacterial isolates from these patients were resistant to commonly available antibiotics, including carbapenems and sulbactam; however, combination therapy with a carbapenem and sulbactam led to favorable clinical outcomes in all four patients. We also conducted an in vitro study using isolates from these patients that showed that this drug combination had a synergistic effect with enhanced antibacterial activity against the isolates. Thus, a carbapenem-sulbactam combination may be a therapeutic alternative for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in countries where colistin and tigecycline are not available for clinical use.

Antimicrobial treatment of Capnocytophaga infections.

Capnocytophaga spp. are normal inhabitants of the oropharyngeal flora. They are also involved in periodontal diseases or animal bites, complicated by septicaemia with dissemination to a great variety of sites, both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. This review will focus on their pathogenesis, spectrum of clinical infections and susceptibility to disinfectants and antibiotics. The spread of beta-lactamase-producing strains limits the use of beta-lactams as first-line treatments, underlying the necessity to test the in vitro susceptibility of clinical strains. Many antimicrobial treatments have been used, despite an absence of randomised studies and guidelines regarding the duration of treatment according to infected sites. Imipenem/cilastatin, clindamycin or beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are always effective and their use can be recommended in all infections.

The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data.

This pooled analysis includes 2 phase 3, double-blind trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tigecycline, versus that of imipenem-cilastatin, in 1642 adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Patients were randomized to receive either tigecycline (initial dose of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously every 12 h) or imipenem-cilastatin (500/500 mg intravenously every 6 h) for 5-14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-42 days after therapy) in the co-primary end point microbiologically evaluable and microbiological modified intent-to-treat populations. For the microbiologically evaluable group, clinical cure rates were 86.1% (441/512) for tigecycline, versus 86.2% (442/513) for imipenem-cilastatin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -4.5% to 4.4%; P < .0001 for noninferiority). Clinical cure rates in the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population were 80.2% (506/631) for tigecycline, versus 81.5% (514/631) for imipenem-cilastatin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -5.8% to 3.2%; P < .0001 for noninferiority). Nausea (24.4% tigecycline, 19.0% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .01]), vomiting (19.2% tigecycline, 14.3% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .008]), and diarrhea (13.8% tigecycline, 13.2% imipenem-cilastatin [P = .719]) were the most frequently reported adverse events. This pooled analysis demonstrates that tigecycline was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.