Human Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subcutaneous Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum in Women.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium collagenase histolyticum (CCH) is being evaluated in women as a cellulite treatment. OBJECTIVE: To report preclinical safety and human pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety data for CCH. METHODS: Across 3 PK studies, 41 women received 12 subcutaneous injections per thigh/buttock in 1 session (up to 3.36 mg/dose). Blood samples were taken at baseline; at 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes postdose; and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 168, and 504 hours postdose. In a preclinical study, rats received 0, 0.029, 0.13, or 0.29 mg/dose of CCH intravenously (IV) every other day (QOD) for 16 days (total, 8 doses) and were evaluated for histopathologic changes. RESULTS: In human PK studies, no quantifiable plasma concentrations of AUX-I or AUX-II were observed postdose (n= 39 evaluable). Adverse events were injection site–related (bruising [97.6%], pain [87.8%], and edema/swelling [46.3%]). Antidrug antibodies were seen in most women at 504 hours postdose. In rats, plasma concentrations of AUX-I and AUX-II (CCH components) were measurable for 30 minutes and 1-2 hours, respectively, after IV administration. At ≥43× proposed human therapeutic dose on a mg/kg basis, rats experienced elevated liver enzyme levels, increased liver weights, and histologic changes that were mostly reversed during a 14-day recovery period. CONCLUSIONS: In human studies, no quantifiable circulating CCH levels were observed after a single subcutaneous dose of CCH up to 3.36 mg. Preclinical data indicated that repeat IV dosing (QOD; 8 doses) at ≥43× proposed human dose on a mg/kg basis for CCH was generally well tolerated.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(9):852-856. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5048THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Cellulite: A Review.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of cellulite is unclear. Treatment of cellulite has targeted adipose tissue, dermis, and fibrous septae with varying degrees of success and durability of response. OBJECTIVE: Results from clinical trials that target different anatomical aspects of cellulite can provide insights into the underlying pathophysiology of cellulite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov website was conducted to identify clinical trials that have investigated treatments for cellulite. RESULTS: A lack of trial protocol standardization, objective means for quantification of improvement and reported cellulite severity, and short-term follow-up, as well as variation in assessment methods have made comparisons among efficacy studies challenging. However, the lack of durable efficacy and inconsistency seen in clinical results suggest that dermal or adipose tissue changes are not the primary etiologies of cellulite. Clinical studies targeting the collagen-rich fibrous septae in cellulite dimples through mechanical, surgical, or enzymatic approaches suggest that targeting fibrous septae is the strategy most likely to provide durable improvement of skin topography and the appearance of cellulite. CONCLUSION: The etiology of cellulite has not been completely elucidated. However, there is compelling clinical evidence that fibrous septae play a central role in the pathophysiology of cellulite.

Anesthesia for collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection in patients with dupuytren disease: A cohort analysis.

Procedural pain is one of the most common adverse effects reported by patients with Dupuytren disease (DD) treated with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of wrist block before CCH injection in reducing procedural pain and to analyze its impact on adverse effects. We performed a prospective, single-center study in which we compared two groups of patients in a consecutive cohort. In the first group (NO-BLOCK), wrist block was only performed before finger extension, whereas in the second group (BLOCK), it was performed before CCH injection and finger extension. Pain was assessed on a 10-item numerical rating scale. Our results show that pain scores were clearlylower in the BLOCK group than in the NO-BLOCK group: 4.72 vs. 0.61 for CCH injection and 3.43 vs. 0.82 for finger extension. Patients who rated CCH injection pain with a score of 4 or higher were 11 times more likely to experience pain during extension. There was a weak correlation between the use of wrist block for CCH injection and the occurrence of skin lacerations (Spearman's rho = -0.222, p < 0.01) and the presence of pruritus (Spearman's rho = 0.183, p < 0.07). In conclusion, wrist block before CCH injection is an effective measure of decreasing perceived pain throughout the different stages of CCH treatment in patients with DD.

Clostridial collagenase ointment and medicinal honey utilization for pressure ulcers in US hospitals.

AIMS: To describe the utilization of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) and medicinal honey debridement methods in real-world inpatient and outpatient hospital settings among pressure ulcer (PU) patients and compare the frequency of healthcare re-encounters between CCO- and medicinal honey-treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified hospital discharge records for patients receiving CCO or medicinal honey methods of debridement and having an ICD-9 code for PU were extracted from the US Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable analysis was used to compare the frequency of inpatient and outpatient revisits up to 6 months after an index encounter for CCO- vs medicinal honey-treated PUs. RESULTS: The study identified 48,267 inpatients and 2,599 outpatients with PUs treated with CCO or medicinal honeys. Among study inpatients, n = 44,725 (93%) were treated with CCO, and n = 3,542 (7%) with medicinal honeys. CCO and medicinal honeys accounted for 1,826 (70%) and 773 (30%), respectively, of study outpatients. In adjusted models, those treated with CCO had lower odds for inpatient readmissions (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80-0.94) after inpatient index visits, and outpatient re-encounters both after inpatient (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.67-0.79) and outpatient (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.64-0.95) index visits in 6 months of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The study was observational in nature, and did not adjust for reasons why patients were hospitalized initially, or why they returned to the facility. Although the study adjusted for differences in a variety of demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics between the treatments, we are not able to rule out selection bias. CONCLUSION: Patients with CCO-treated PUs returned to inpatient and outpatient hospital settings less often compared with medicinal honey-treated PUs. These results from real-world administrative data help to gain a better understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with PUs treated with these two debridement methods and the economic implications of debridement choice in the acute care setting.

Resource utilisation associated with single digit Dupuytren's contracture treated with either surgery or injection of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum.

UNLABELLED: The gold standard treatment for Dupuytren's contracture is surgical excision of the cord. A non-surgical treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection is available but appears costly. OBJECTIVES: To provide data on resource consumption related to surgical and non-surgical treatment for Dupuytren's contracture. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with a single digit Dupuytren's contracture, 10 treated with surgical excision, and 10 treated with a single injection of collagenase. MEASUREMENTS: Minutes spent in theatre, number of follow-up appointments, time to skin healing, and patients return to normal activities of daily living. RESULTS: The injection group was significantly better regarding theatre time (p < 0.0001), follow-up appointments (p = 0.048), skin healing time (p < 0.001), and return to normal activities of daily living (p = 0.02) than the operated group. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant personal and health economic differences between the two methods of treatment which may influence local choice.