Iron distribution in different tissues of homozygous Mask (msk/msk) mice and the effects of oral iron treatments.

Iron-refractory iron deficiency anemia (IRIDA) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by genetic mutations on TMPRSS6 gene which encodes Matriptase2 (MT2). An altered MT2 cannot appropriately suppress hepatic BMP6/SMAD signaling in case of low iron, hence hepcidin excess blocks dietary iron absorption, leading to a form of anemia resistant to oral iron supplementation. In this study, using the IRIDA mouse model Mask, we characterized homozygous (msk/msk) compared to asymptomatic heterozygous (msk/wt) mice, assessing the major parameters of iron status in different organs, at different ages in both sexes. The effect of carbonyl iron diet was analyzed as control iron supplementation being used for many studies in mice. It resulted effective in both anemic control and msk/msk mice, as expected, even if there is no information about its mechanism of absorption. Then, we mainly compared two forms of oral iron supplement, largely used for humans: ferrous sulfate and Sucrosomial iron. In anemic control mice, the two oral formulations corrected hemoglobin levels from 11.40 ± 0.60 to 15.38 ± 1.71 g/dl in 2-4 weeks. Interestingly, in msk/msk mice, ferrous sulfate did not increase hemoglobin likely due to ferroportin/hepcidin-dependent absorption, whereas Sucrosomial iron increased it from 11.50 ± 0.60 to 13.53 ± 0.64 g/dl mainly in the first week followed by a minor increase at 4 weeks with a stable level of 13.30 ± 0.80 g/dl, probably because of alternative absorption. Thus, Sucrosomial iron, already used in other conditions of iron deficiency, may represent a promising option for oral iron supplementation in IRIDA patients.

Dietary iron overload mitigates atherosclerosis in high-fat diet-fed apolipoprotein E knockout mice: Role of dysregulated hepatic fatty acid metabolism.

The atherosclerosis "iron hypothesis" generates a fair amount of debate since it has been proposed. Here, we revisited the "iron hypothesis" by examining whether dietary iron overload would intensify iron deposition in plaques and thus lead to further exacerbation of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout (ApoE KO) mice. ApoE KO mice were fed either a normal chow diet (ND) or a high fat diet (HFD) supplemented with or without 2% carbonyl iron (Fe) for 16 weeks. However, contrary to our assumption, dietary iron overloading did not intensify, but rather diminished the atherosclerotic lesion area by 65.3%, which was accompanied by significantly decreased serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol contents, together with hepatic lipid accumulation decline, despite the evident existence of aortic iron accumulation and the typical signs of iron overload in ApoE KO mice. Using isobaric tag for absolute quantification (iTRAQ) proteomics approach, hepatic CD36 and fatty acid binding proteins-mediated fatty acid (FA) uptake and trafficking impairment were identified as the key potential pathomechanisms by which iron overload diminishes atherosclerotic lesions. Furthermore, downstream hepatic FA de novo biosynthesis was enhanced and FA oxidation was inhibited to compensate for the FA deficiency triggered by iron overload-impaired fatty acid uptake and trafficking. Our findings suggested that dietary iron overload is not atherogenic in ApoE KO mice, and more research efforts are warranted to revisit the "iron hypothesis" of atherosclerosis.

Efficacy of a 28-compartment pillbox for improving iron supplement compliance in healthy pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.

A randomised controlled trial was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a pillbox for increasing iron supplement compliance by comparing the proportion of pregnant women who had no remaining iron tablets between pregnant women attending ANC who were given a pillbox to use and women with no pillbox in four-week period between ANC visits. The secondary objective was to evaluate the reasons for poor compliance and possible factors associated with the non-compliance. One hundred and ninety pregnant women were enrolled, 95 participants were randomised into each of the groups. The proportion of pregnant women who had no remaining iron tablets at the end was statistically significantly lower in the pillbox group than in the control group [53.3% and 23.1%, respectively, p < .001, RR2.308 (95% CI 1.515 - 3.517)]. The most common reason given for having of iron tablets remaining was forgetfulness. The visual analog scale (VAS) scores indicated that patient's responsibility feeling, duration of sleep each day and presence of a handicapped or small child in care significantly influenced the proportion of pregnant women who had remaining iron tablets at the end in both groups. We concluded that a pillbox was found to be an effective tool for improving pregnant women's compliance with taking their iron supplements.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known about this subject? Antenatal care (ANC) influences maternal and neonatal outcomes. The incidence of anaemia in pregnant women is reported to be around 42% and approximately 50% result from iron deficiency. Maternal anaemia increases the risk of foetal low birth weight, preterm birth, perinatal mortality, stillbirth and maternal mortality.What do the results of this study add? The 28-compartment pillbox is effective for improving iron supplement compliance in healthy pregnant women. Forgetfulness is the most common reason given for having remaining iron tablets. The lower score on the visual analog scale of patient's feeling of responsibility, long duration of sleep a day and the presence of a handicapped or small child in their care were significantly associated with having remaining iron tablets.What are the implications are of these finding for clinical practice and/or further research? The 28-compartment pillbox can be implied to routine antenatal care for improving iron supplement compliance in healthy pregnant women. Health care providers should be reminded to encourage compliance with iron supplement prescription in pregnant women who are at risk of poor compliance as indicated by low VAS of the patient's feeling of responsibility, long duration of sleep in a day and pregnant women who have responsibility to take care of handicapped or small children.

Iron Fortification Practices and Implications for Iron Addition to Salt.

This introductory article provides an in-depth technical background for iron fortification, and thus introduces a series of articles in this supplement designed to present the current evidence on the fortification of salt with both iodine and iron, that is, double-fortified salt (DFS). This article reviews our current knowledge of the causes and consequences of iron deficiency and anemia and then, with the aim of assisting the comparison between DFS and other common iron-fortified staple foods, discusses the factors influencing the efficacy of iron-fortified foods. This includes the dietary and physiological factors influencing iron absorption; the choice of an iron compound and the fortification technology that will ensure the necessary iron absorption with no sensory changes; encapsulation of iron fortification compounds to prevent unacceptable sensory changes; the addition of iron absorption enhancers; the estimation of the iron fortification level for each vehicle based on iron requirements and consumption patterns; and the iron status biomarkers that are needed to demonstrate improved iron status in populations regularly consuming the iron-fortified food. The supplement is designed to provide a summary of evidence to date that can help advise policy makers considering DFS as an intervention to address the difficult public health issue of iron deficiency anemia, while at the same time using DFS to target iodine deficiency.

Relationship between patient ethnicity and prevalence of anemia during pregnancy and the puerperium period and compliance with healthcare recommendations - implications for targeted health policy.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common during pregnancy and the puerperium. The association of ethnicity as well as other characteristics with anemia and compliance with healthcare recommendations has not been studied sufficiently and needs to be explored in order to implement a targeted health policy. We examined the association between ethnicity and the risk for prenatal and puerperium anemia and the compliance with healthcare recommendations. This effort aims to guide reforms in policies and practices that will assist in decreasing anemia prevalence in Israel. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study database including 1558 women who delivered vaginally at Emek Medical Center. Anemia was assessed before delivery by obtaining a complete blood count (CBC). After delivery, CBCs were taken in cases of postpartum hemorrhage, symptoms consistent with anemia, prenatal anemia or other clinical indications. The study population was divided according to their ethnicity (Jews and Arabs). The primary outcomes were anemia before delivery, anemia in the immediate postpartum and 6 weeks postpartum, and compliance with healthcare recommendations, which was defined as the rate of women who performed a routine CBC test 6-weeks-postpartum. RESULTS: The rates of anemia before delivery and in the puerperium period were similar between Jews and Arabs (before delivery: 88 (11%) versus 98 (14%); 6 weeks postpartum: 55 (21%) vs 68 (28%), respectively;p > 0.05). Iron supplementation was high in both groups during pregnancy (~ 90%) and lower during the postpartum for Jews compared to Arabs (72% vs 83%,respectively; P < .0001). Only one third of the patients performed a CBC 6-weeks-postpartum regardless of ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Overall compliance with health recommendation was high during pregnancy but low postpartum and was reflected in anemia persistence regardless of ethnicity. Because of the adverse long term impact of anemia on patient's health, new policies need to be developed to improve patient's compliance postpartum. A possible strategy is to combine the follow-up of the mother with the one of the newborn in the family health stations (Tipat Halav) and the community clinics similarly to the close follow-up during pregnancy. Additional methods may include active summoning for CBC test and assuring iron supplement consumption.

[Moderate anaemia refractory to oral iron in a pregnant woman with a history of bariatric surgery]. / Anemia moderada refractaria al hierro oral en una gestante con antecedente de cirugía bariátrica.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: bariatric surgery involves nutritional and trace element deficiencies that may have a negative impact if not treated properly, especially in situations such as pregnancy. Case report: a patient who underwent biliopancreatic diversion surgery without subsequent therapeutic adherence consults due to edema; findings included 29-week gestation (type 1 intrauterine growth restriction) and moderate anemia. Vitamin supplementation, oligoelements, enteral nutrition, and intravenous iron were restarted. Due to poor hemoglobin response with repleted iron deposits, recombinant human erythropoietin was associated. Discussion: the most frequent nutritional deficiencies after malabsorptive bariatric surgery are sideropenia and hypoproteinemia. Sideropenia and anemia increase the risk of preterm delivery, low weight, and perinatal mortality. In patients with inadequate response to intravenous iron, treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin may be considered, although its use in pregnant women without chronic renal failure has no indication in the prescribing information of this drug.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la cirugía bariátrica (CB) implica déficits nutricionales y de oligoelementos que pueden tener una repercusión negativa en caso de no tratarse adecuadamente, especialmente en situaciones como la gestación. Caso clínico: paciente sometida a CB del tipo de la derivación biliopancreática, sin adherencia terapéutica posterior, que acude por edemas, confirmándose la presencia de una gestación de 29 semanas (feto CIR de tipo I) y de anemia moderada. Se reinició la suplementación de vitaminas, oligoelementos, nutrición enteral y hierro intravenoso (FEIV). Debido a la escasa respuesta de la hemoglobina con depósitos de hierro repletados, se asoció eritropoyetina humana recombinante (rHuEPO). Discusión: los déficits nutricionales más frecuentes tras una CB malabsortiva son la ferropenia y la hipoproteinemia. La ferropenia y la anemia incrementan el riesgo del parto pretérmino, el bajo peso y la mortalidad perinatal. En las pacientes sin adecuada respuesta al FEIV puede plantearse el tratamiento con rHuEPO, aunque su uso en gestantes sin insuficiencia renal crónica no dispone de indicación en la ficha técnica.

Recovery of Iron Stores After Adolescents Donate Blood.

BACKGROUND: Teenagers aged 16 to 18 are at increased risk for iron deficiency, exacerbated by losses with whole blood (WB) or double red blood cell (2RBC) donations. Required 56-day (WB) or 112-day (2RBC) interdonation intervals (IDIs) are too short for many to replace lost iron without supplements. METHODS: Teenagers donating WB or 2RBCs at Vitalant, a national blood provider, had serum ferritin measured at their first and immediately subsequent successful donation from December 2016 to 2018. We modeled postindex log-ferritin as a function of IDI to estimate the shortest intervals that corresponded with 50% to 95% prevalence of adequate donor iron stores (ferritin ≥20 ng/mL female donors, ≥30 ng/mL male donors) at the subsequent donation. RESULTS: Among 30 806 teenagers, 11.4% of female and 9.7% of male donors had inadequate iron stores at index donation. Overall, 92.6% had follow-up ferritin values within 13 months. Approximately 12 months after WB index donations, >60% of female and >80% of male donors had adequate iron stores (>50% and >70% after 2RBC donations). Follow-up-donation iron stores were highly dependent on index ferritin. Less than half of WB donors with low ferritin at index achieved adequate stores within 12 months. Achieving a ≥90% prevalence of adequate ferritin at 12 months required index values >50 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that postdonation low-dose iron supplements should be strongly encouraged in teenagers with borderline or low iron stores to permit donation without increased risk for symptoms of mild iron depletion. Increasing the minimum recommended IDI to allow time for replacing donation-related iron losses may be desirable for teenagers.

A randomized controlled trial comparing oral and intravenous iron supplementation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency (ID) is one of the most common postoperative deficiencies that may develop after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The optimal mode of treatment is uncertain. AIM: To compare the efficacy of oral ferrous fumarate (FF), oral ferrous gluconate (FG), and a single intravenous infusion of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in women with ID after RYGB. METHODS: Multicenter randomized controlled trial including 120 women with a serum ferritin <20 µg/l during follow-up after RYGB. They were randomized into three groups: 41 patients were treated with FF 200 mg three times a day (total daily dose: 195 mg elemental iron), 39 received FG 695 mg twice a day (total daily dose: 160 mg elemental iron) for three months, and 39 patients were treated with a single intravenous dose of FCM (1000 mg elemental iron). Serum ferritin levels were measured at six weeks, and three, six and twelve months after the start of supplementation. RESULTS: At three months, persistence of ID was observed in 29.4% and 42.4% of the patients treated with FF and FG, respectively, but in none of those treated with FCM (p < 0.001). Over the next nine months, recurrence of ID was observed in 56.5% of patients treated with FF, in 52.9% treated with FG, and in 27.8% of those treated with FCM. Adverse effects were most common during oral treatment. CONCLUSION: In women developing ID after RYGB, a single dose of intravenous FCM is more effective and better tolerated than the standard treatment with either FF or FG. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER AND WEBSITE: The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT02271997.

The Influence of Antenatal Oral Iron and Folic Acid Side Effects on Supplementation Duration in Low-Resource Rural Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Undesirable effects of a daily regimen of iron and folic acid ingested jointly (iron-folate) are potential disincentives to optimal antenatal supplementation. We intended to profile antenatal iron-folate side effects and elucidate their influence on supplementation duration in low-resource rural Kenya. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study of randomly selected postnatal mothers of under-five-year-old children. Using a modified WHO Safe Motherhood Assessment standard questionnaire, they recalled the total number of days of antenatal iron-folate intake and the attendant supplement-attributed undesirable experiences. The analyses considered only participants who ingested the supplements in their immediate last pregnancies (n = 277). RESULTS: About half of the study participants reported at least a side effect and a mean of 2.4 (SD 1.5) effects per person in the entire pregnancy period. Most common reported effects were chest pains (31.8%), constipation (28.5%), severe stomach pains (11.6%), and diarrhoea (11.6%). Mothers who reported at least a side effect ingested the supplements for ten days less compared to those who did not experience any effect (p = 0.03); and a greater proportion of the former were primigravida (p = 0.02) and used combined form of iron and folic acid (p = 0.003). In a multivariate analysis, significant correlations with supplementation compliance (ingestion for 90+ days) were found only for nausea and severe stomach pain experiences (r = -0.1, p = 0.04; r = 0.2, p = 0.01, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: The commonness of undesirable experiences attributed to daily ingestion of 60 mg iron and 0.4 mg folic acid and their deterrence to longer supplementation durations suggest the need for considering a weekly intermittent regimen for some antenatal women in such set-ups. Our study demonstrated that potentially, more counselling on nausea as a side effect might be critical in advancing iron-folate supplementation compliance.

Liposomal iron in moderate chronic kidney disease. / Hierro liposomal en la enfermedad renal crónica moderada.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The optimal iron supplementation route of administration (intravenous vs oral) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis is a hot topic of debate. An oral preparation (liposomal iron, FeSu) has recently been developed with high bioavailability and low incidence of side effects. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of FeSu in patients with stage 3 CKD and gastrointestinal intolerance to conventional oral iron therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of patients with stable stage 3 CKD and gastrointestinal intolerance to conventional oral iron therapy. An oral 30mg/day dose of FeSu was administered for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was haemoglobin increase at 6 and 12 months. Treatment adherence and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: 37 patients aged 72.6±14.7 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 42±10ml/min/1.73m2 were included. 32 patients had received previous treatment with conventional oral formulations, 73% of which exhibited gastrointestinal intolerance with treatment adherence of 9.4%. After 6 months with FeSu, an increase in haemoglobin was observed versus baseline, which was sustained at 12 months (0.49±0.19 and 0.36±0.19g/dl, respectively, P<.05), despite a significant eGFR decrease of 3.16±1.16 and 4.20±1.28ml/min/1.73 m2 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. None of the patients experienced adverse reactions that required the treatment to be suspended. Adherence was 100% at both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: FeSu is effective in a cohort of patients with stage 3 CKD with similar characteristics to the general population of moderate CKD patients, with a low rate of adverse reactions and excellent tolerability.

Preoperative Iron Supplementation and Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Hip Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture surgery (HFS) is often associated with perioperative blood loss, and it frequently necessitates transfusion. However, the hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for transfusion remains controversial in hip fracture patients. We evaluated the usefulness of the restrictive strategy and preoperative intravenous iron supplementation in HFS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,634 patients (> 60 years of age) who underwent HFS between May 2003 and June 2014 and were followed up for 1 year or more after surgery. We used the liberal transfusion strategy until May 2009 to determine the transfusion threshold; afterwards, we switched to the restrictive transfusion strategy. Patients with the restrictive transfusion strategy (restrictive group) received intravenous iron supplementation before surgery. We compared the transfusion rate, morbidity, and mortality of the restrictive group with those of the patients with the liberal transfusion strategy (liberal group). RESULTS: Preoperative intravenous iron supplementation was not associated with any adverse reactions. The transfusion rate was 65.3% (506/775) in the liberal group and 48.2% (414/859) in the restrictive group (p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was shorter in the restrictive group (21.5 vs. 28.8 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative medical complications including myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular event. Mortality at postoperative 30, 60, and 90 days was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our blood management protocol involving restrictive strategy combined with preoperative intravenous iron supplementation appears to be effective and safe in HFS of elderly patients.

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy of Ferrous Ascorbate and Iron Polymaltose Complex in Iron Deficiency Anemia in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of Ferrous ascorbate (FA) and Iron polymaltose complex (IPC) in Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in children. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a tertiary care hospital with 125 (1-12 y) children having clinical symptoms and signs of IDA. Participants were randomized into FA group and IPC group. Both the groups received iron salts (FA or IPC) randomly in a dose of 6 mg/kg elemental iron for 3 mo and followed up on day 3, day 7, at the end of 1 mo and 3 mo for Hemoglobin (Hb), Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Red cell distribution width (RDW) and reticulocyte count. RESULTS: Both groups had an improvement in hematological parameters at 3 mo of intervention. The difference in the rise of Hb (g%) at the end of 1 mo in FA group (3.13 ± 1.01) vs. IPC group (2.0 ± 0.85); p = 0.017 and at 3 mo in FA group (4.88 ± 1.28) vs. IPC group (3.33 ± 1.33); p = 0.001 was statistically significant. The difference in the rise of mean Hb was significantly better in FA than the IPC group F [3392] =1.79; p = 0.00 (ANOVA). The difference in the mean increase in MCV (fL) at day 7 in FA group (6.71 ± 8.32) vs. IPC group (2.91 ± 6.16); p = 0.011 and at 1 mo FA group (9.80 ± 8.56) vs. IPC group (5.35 ± 6.11); p = 0.004 was statistically significant. The mean decrease in RDW (%) at 1 mo in FA group (4.23 ± 3.27) vs. IPC group (2.67 ± 1.95); p = 0.005 and at 3 mo in FA group (5.74 ± 3.63) vs. IPC group (4.04 ± 2.17); p = 0.006 was statistically significant. The difference in the rise in mean reticulocyte count at day 3 in FA group (0.88 ± 0.50) vs. IPC group (0.43 ± 1.20); p = 0.017 and at day 7 in FA group (4.00 ± 1.69) vs. IPC group (2.19 ± 1.24); p = 0.001 was statistically significant. F [2294] = 29.2, p = 0.00 (ANOVA). During the study period, the FA group had minor adverse reactions whereas the IPC group had none. CONCLUSIONS: Both the iron salts (FA and IPC) used in the treatment of IDA showed statistically significant improvement in the hematological parameters during the 3 mo of intervention. The improvement in hematological parameters was better in FA supplemented patients as compared to IPC.

Bacteria-assisted biogreen synthesis of radical scavenging exopolysaccharide-iron complexes: an oral nano-sized nutritional supplement with high in vivo compatibility.

Microbial exopolysaccharides (EPSs) have recently served as an efficient substrate for the production of biocompatible metal nanoparticles (NPs) given their favorable stabilizing and reducing properties due to the presence of polyanionic functional groups in their structure. In the present work, Pantoea sp. BCCS 001 GH was used to produce EPS-stabilized biogenic Fe NPs as a complex through a novel biosynthesis reaction. Physicochemical characterization of the EPS-Fe complex was performed, indicating high thermal stability, desirable magnetic properties due to the uniform distribution of the Fe NPs with the average size of ∼10 nm and spherical shape within the EPS matrix. In addition, the in vivo toxicity of the EPS-stabilized Fe NPs was evaluated to investigate their potential for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. Biological blood parameters and organ histology studies confirmed very high safety of the biosynthesized composite, making EPS-Fe a suitable candidate with an economical and environment friendly synthesis method for a wide spectrum of potential fields in medicine.

Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: The anaemia seen in chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be exacerbated by iron deficiency. Iron can be provided through different routes, with advantages and drawbacks of each route. It remains unclear whether the potential harms and additional costs of intravenous (IV) compared with oral iron are justified. This is an update of a review first published in 2012. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of IV iron supplementation compared with oral iron for anaemia in adults and children with CKD, including participants on dialysis, with kidney transplants and CKD not requiring dialysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 7 December 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which IV and oral routes of iron administration were compared in adults and children with CKD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous outcomes the mean difference (MD) was used or standardised mean difference (SMD) if different scales had been used. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed to investigate between study differences. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 39 studies (3852 participants), 11 of which were added in this update. A low risk of bias was attributed to 20 (51%) studies for sequence generation, 14 (36%) studies for allocation concealment, 22 (56%) studies for attrition bias and 20 (51%) for selective outcome reporting. All studies were at a high risk of performance bias. However, all studies were considered at low risk of detection bias because the primary outcome in all studies was laboratory-based and unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding.There is insufficient evidence to suggest that IV iron compared with oral iron makes any difference to death (all causes) (11 studies, 1952 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.64, 1.94) (absolute effect: 33 participants per 1000 with IV iron versus 31 per 1000 with oral iron), the number of participants needing to start dialysis (4 studies, 743 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.41, 1.61) or the number needing blood transfusions (5 studies, 774 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.55, 1.34) (absolute effect: 87 per 1,000 with IV iron versus 101 per 1,000 with oral iron). These analyses were assessed as having low certainty evidence. It is uncertain whether IV iron compared with oral iron reduces cardiovascular death because the certainty of this evidence was very low (3 studies, 206 participants: RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 7.18). Quality of life was reported in five studies with four reporting no difference between treatment groups and one reporting improvement in participants treated with IV iron.IV iron compared with oral iron may increase the numbers of participants, who experience allergic reactions or hypotension (15 studies, 2607 participants: RR 3.56, 95% CI 1.88 to 6.74) (absolute harm: 24 per 1000 with IV iron versus 7 per 1000) but may reduce the number of participants with all gastrointestinal adverse effects (14 studies, 1986 participants: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.66) (absolute benefit: 150 per 1000 with IV iron versus 319 per 1000). These analyses were assessed as having low certainty evidence.IV iron compared with oral iron may increase the number of participants who achieve target haemoglobin (13 studies, 2206 participants: RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.04) (absolute benefit: 542 participants per 1,000 with IV iron versus 317 per 1000 with oral iron), increased haemoglobin (31 studies, 3373 participants: MD 0.72 g/dL, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.05); ferritin (33 studies, 3389 participants: MD 224.84 µg/L, 95% CI 165.85 to 283.83) and transferrin saturation (27 studies, 3089 participants: MD 7.69%, 95% CI 5.10 to 10.28), and may reduce the dose required of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) (11 studies, 522 participants: SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.31) while making little or no difference to glomerular filtration rate (8 studies, 1052 participants: 0.83 mL/min, 95% CI -0.79 to 2.44). All analyses were assessed as having low certainty evidence. There were moderate to high degrees of heterogeneity in these analyses but in meta-regression, definite reasons for this could not be determined. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provide low certainty evidence that IV iron compared with oral iron increases haemoglobin, ferritin and transferrin levels in CKD participants, increases the number of participants who achieve target haemoglobin and reduces ESA requirements. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether IV iron compared with oral iron influences death (all causes), cardiovascular death and quality of life though most studies reported only short periods of follow-up. Adverse effects were reported in only 50% of included studies. We therefore suggest that further studies that focus on patient-centred outcomes with longer follow-up periods are needed to determine if the use of IV iron is justified on the basis of reductions in ESA dose and cost, improvements in patient quality of life, and with few serious adverse effects.

Multifunctional nanoplatform for photoacoustic imaging-guided combined therapy enhanced by CO induced ferroptosis.

A multifunctional CO/thermo/chemotherapy nanoplatform is here reported, which is composed of mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (MCN) as near infrared (NIR)-responsive drug carrier, doxorubicin (DOX) as chemotherapeutic drug and triiron dodecacarbonyl (FeCO) as thermosensitive CO prodrug. The nanoplatform could absorb near-infrared (NIR) light and convert it into ample heat to trigger CO release and could also release DOX in the acidic tumor microenvironment. More importantly, the generated CO molecules successfully increase cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutics by the ferroptosis pathway. Subsequently, under the guidance of photoacoustic imaging, the FeCO-DOX@MCN nanoplatform demonstrates high treatment efficacies in vitro and in vivo by combination of chemotherapy, photothermal therapy and gas therapy. This multifunctional platform with excellent antitumor efficacy has great potential in precision cancer therapy.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ORAL IRON SUPPLEMENTATION AND RETINAL OR SUBRETINAL HEMORRHAGE IN THE COMPARISON OF AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION TREATMENT TRIALS.

PURPOSE: Because patients often take iron supplements without medical indication, and iron can accumulate in vascular endothelial cells, the authors evaluated the association of oral iron supplementation with retinal/subretinal hemorrhage in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A post hoc secondary data analysis of comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials was performed. Participants were interviewed for use of oral iron supplements. Trained readers evaluated retinal/subretinal hemorrhage in baseline fundus photographs. Adjusted odds ratios from multivariate logistic regression models assessed the association between iron use and baseline hemorrhage adjusted by age, sex, smoking, hypertension, anemia, and use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs. RESULTS: Among 1,165 participants, baseline retinal/subretinal hemorrhage was present in the study eye in 71% of 181 iron users and in 61% of 984 participants without iron use (adjusted odds ratio = 1.47, P = 0.04), and the association was dose dependent (adjusted linear trend P = 0.048). Iron use was associated with hemorrhage in participants with hypertension (adjusted odds ratio = 1.87, P = 0.006) but not without hypertension. The association of iron use with hemorrhage remained significant among hypertensive participants without anemia (adjusted odds ratio = 1.85, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among participants of comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials, the use of oral iron supplements was associated with retinal/subretinal hemorrhage in a dose-response manner. Unindicated iron supplementation may be detrimental in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration.

Identifying responders to oral iron supplementation in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the IRONOUT-HF trial.

BACKGROUND: The IRONOUT-HF trial previously demonstrated that oral iron supplementation minimally increased iron stores and did not improve exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and iron deficiency. METHODS: The IRONOUT-HF trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial designed to test the efficacy and safety of oral iron polysaccharide compared to matching placebo among patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency. Study participants received oral iron polysaccharide 150 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 16 weeks. Response to oral iron was defined as a ferritin level >300 ng/mL or a ferritin level 100-300 ng/mL with a transferrin saturation >20% at the end of the study. RESULTS: The final analytical cohort included 98 patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency at baseline. Study participants had a median (25, 75) age of 63 years (54 years, 71 years), included 40% women (N = 39). After 16 weeks of therapy, 24 patients (24%) responded to oral iron supplementation while 74 patients (76%) remained iron deficient despite treatment. There was no association between response to oral iron supplementation and improvement in functional status (i.e. peak VO2 or anaerobic threshold), myocardial stress (i.e. NT-proBNP levels), or HRQOL (i.e. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) at week 16. CONCLUSION: This study failed to identify a subset of responders more likely to derive a clinical benefit from oral iron therapy and does not support its routine use in patients with symptomatic HFrEF and iron deficiency.

Simultaneous hyperthermia-chemotherapy effect by arterial injection of Fe(Salen) for femur tumor.

We previously identified a novel nanomagnetic particle, N,N'-bis(salicylidene)ethylenediamine iron [Fe(Salen)]. Fe(Salen) not only shows antitumor effects but also magnetic properties. We found that Fe(Salen) can be used for magnet-guided drug delivery and visualization of accumulated drug by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of its magnetism. In addition, Fe(Salen) can generate heat by itself when exposed to an alternating current magnetic field (AMF), resulting in a hyperthermia effect. Herein, we partly elucidated the antitumor mechanism of Fe(Salen) and carried out an i.v. repeated dose toxicity study to decide the therapeutic amount. Furthermore, we evaluated the antitumor effect of selective intra-arterial injection or i.v. injection of Fe(Salen) by catheter and the hyperthermia effect of Fe(Salen) when exposed to AMF in vivo. We used a rabbit model grafted with VX2 cells (rabbit squamous cell carcinoma) on the right leg. Intra-arterial injection of Fe(Salen) showed a greater antitumor effect than did i.v. injection. The combination of Fe(Salen) intra-arterial injection and AMF exposure showed a greater antitumor effect than did either Fe(Salen) or methotrexate (MTX) without AMF exposure, suggesting that AMF exposure greatly enhanced the antitumor effect of Fe(Salen) by arterial injection by catheter. This is the first report that the effectiveness of Fe(Salen) was evaluated in the point of administration route; that is, selective intra-arterial injection by catheter. Taken together, these results indicate a new administration route; that is, selective arterial injection of Fe(Salen) by catheter, and the development of a new strategy of simultaneous hyperthermia-chemotherapy in the future.

Treating Anemia in the Preanesthesia Assessment Clinic: Results of a Retrospective Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anemia is challenging during hospital stay because anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. With the implementation of patient blood management (PBM), a preanesthesia assessment clinic to screen and treat anemia before elective surgery was institutionalized at Muenster University Hospital, Germany. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between treating preoperative anemic patients with intravenous iron (IVI) and (primarily) presurgical hemoglobin levels and (secondarily) use of RBCs and mortality. METHODS: Between April 1, 2014, and July 4, 2016, patients scheduled for elective surgery with a risk for RBC transfusions >10% in 2013 were screened for preoperative anemia and, if indicated, treated with IVI. Patients' data, time span between visit in the anesthesia/PBM clinic and surgery, demographic data, type of surgery, the difference of hemoglobin levels between visit and surgery, RBC transfusion, infectious-related International Classification of Disease codes during hospital stay, and 1-year survival were determined retrospectively by screening electronic data files. In addition, patients were interviewed about adverse events, health-related events, and infections via telephone 30, 90, and 365 days after visiting the anesthesia/PBM clinic. RESULTS: A total of 1101 patients were seen in the anesthesia/PBM clinic between days -28 and -1 (median [Q1-Q3], -3 days [-1, -9 days]) before elective surgery. Approximately 29% of patients presented with anemia, 46.8% of these anemic patients were treated with ferric carboxymaltose (500-1000 mg).In the primary analysis, hemoglobin levels at median were associated with a reduction between the visit in the anesthesia/PBM clinic and the surgery in all nonanemic patients on beginning of medical treatment (nonanemic patients at median -2.8 g/dL [-4, -0.9 g/dL], while anemic patients without IVI presented with median differences of -0.8 g/dL [-2, 0 g/dL] and anemic patients with IVI of 0 g/dL [-1.0, 0.5 g/dL]). Hemoglobin levels raised best at substitution 22-28 days before surgery (0.95 g/dL [-0.35, 1.18 g/dL]). Due to the selection criteria, transfusion rates were high in the cohort. Overall, there was no association between IVI treatment and the use of RBC transfusions (odds ratio for use of RBCs in anemic patients, no IVI versus IVI: 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.82). Patients treated with or without IVI presented a comparable range of International Classification of Disease codes related to infections. Telephone interviews indicated similar adverse events, health-related events, and infections. Cox regression analysis showed an association between anemia and reduced survival, regardless of IVI. CONCLUSIONS: An anemia clinic within the preanesthesia assessment clinic is a feasible and effective approach to treat preoperative anemia. The IVI supplementation was safe but was associated with decreased RBC transfusions in gynecology/obstetric patients only. The conclusions from this retrospective analysis have to be tested in prospective, controlled trials.