Perioperative Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Neotorch Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy have improved clinical outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal combination of checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether toripalimab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy will improve event-free survival and major pathological response in patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC compared with chemotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC (without EGFR or ALK alterations for nonsquamous NSCLC) from March 12, 2020, to June 19, 2023, at 50 participating hospitals in China. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was November 30, 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 240 mg of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for 3 cycles before surgery and 1 cycle after surgery, followed by toripalimab only (240 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were event-free survival (assessed by the investigators) and the major pathological response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review). The secondary outcomes included the pathological complete response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review) and adverse events. Results: Of the 501 patients randomized, 404 had stage III NSCLC (202 in the toripalimab + chemotherapy group and 202 in the placebo + chemotherapy group) and 97 had stage II NSCLC and were excluded from this interim analysis. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-65 years), 92% of patients were male, and the median follow-up was 18.3 months (IQR, 12.7-22.5 months). For the primary outcome of event-free survival, the median length was not estimable (95% CI, 24.4 months-not estimable) in the toripalimab group compared with 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.6-21.9 months) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57], P < .001). The major pathological response rate (another primary outcome) was 48.5% (95% CI, 41.4%-55.6%) in the toripalimab group compared with 8.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-13.1%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 40.2% [95% CI, 32.2%-48.1%], P < .001). The pathological complete response rate (secondary outcome) was 24.8% (95% CI, 19.0%-31.3%) in the toripalimab group compared with 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.5%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 23.7% [95% CI, 17.6%-29.8%]). The incidence of immune-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the toripalimab group. No unexpected treatment-related toxic effects were identified. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, fatal adverse events, and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were comparable between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The addition of toripalimab to perioperative chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in event-free survival for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC and this treatment strategy had a manageable safety profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04158440.

Perioperative Nivolumab and Chemotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive a diagnosis of stage III disease. There is no current consensus regarding the most appropriate treatment for these patients. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (experimental group) or chemotherapy alone (control group), followed by surgery. Patients in the experimental group who had R0 resections received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 6 months. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival at 24 months and safety. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients underwent randomization; 57 were assigned to the experimental group and 29 were assigned to the control group. A pathological complete response occurred in 37% of the patients in the experimental group and in 7% in the control group (relative risk, 5.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 21.23; P = 0.02). Surgery was performed in 93% of the patients in the experimental group and in 69% in the control group (relative risk, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.74). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival at 24 months were 67.2% in the experimental group and 40.9% in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.88). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at 24 months were 85.0% in the experimental group and 63.6% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 11 patients in the experimental group (19%; some patients had events of both grades) and 3 patients in the control group (10%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, perioperative treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADIM II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03838159; EudraCT number, 2018-004515-45.).

Potential efficacy of weekly low-dose administration of bevacizumab as a combination therapy for platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab (Bev) plays the central role of the adjuvant therapy for patients with ovarian carcinoma. The aim of our study was to examine whether differences in the administration of Bev influence the prognosis of patients. METHODS: Patients with ovarian carcinoma who received treatment at two hospitals between 1999 and 2020 were identified. Patients treated with weekly low-dose administration of Bev (100 mg Bev on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg Bev on day 15, monthly) at one hospital (group A) and those with monthly high-dose administration of Bev (15 mg/kg of Bev on day 1, monthly) at another hospital (group B) were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Among the total patients, 44 were assigned to group A and 33 were assigned to group B. More patients in group A had advanced disease (p = 0.03) and a lower dose of Bev at the first time during the first cycle administration (p < 0.01) than in group B. Progression-free survival (PFS) was better in group A than in group B (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that group A was a better prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 0.53, p = 0.03). Stable duration was longer in group A than in group B (p < 0.01). The incidences of adverse effects, including hematological toxicities such as neutropenia (p = 0.01) and nonhematological toxicities such as hypertension (p < 0.01), intestinal obstruction (p < 0.01), and thromboembolic events (p < 0.01), were lower in group A than in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly low-dose administration of Bev might improve prognosis and decrease the frequency of adverse effects associated with this drug although the prospective study was needed to get corroboration.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a change of paradigm? A meta-analysis of aggregate data.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eligible studies were identified using Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Platinum-based AC was associated with improved DFS, while the benefit in OS and CSS was not statistically significant compared to observation. Conversely, platinum-based AC showed a modest OS benefit in an analysis combing multivariable HRs with estimated HRs from Kaplan-Meier curves. Our results suggest that platinum-based AC is associated with improved DFS and a modest OS benefit in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinomas.

Clinical efficacy and safety of Huachansu injection combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Huachansu injection (HCS) is a widely used traditional Chinese medicine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to alleviate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and enhance the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCS as an adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for advanced NSCLC. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of nine databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of HCS plus PBC to treat NSCLC from inception to October 10, 2020. RCTs on HCS plus PBC vs PBC alone for advanced NSCLC were included. Dichotomous data were pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. RCTs compared to HCS plus PBC vs PBC alone were included. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and secondary outcomes were survival rate, quality of life (QOL), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). GRADE software was used to access the quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 32 RCTs, including 2753 patients, were included. Compared to PBC alone, HCS plus PBC improved the ORR, DCR, 1- and 2-year survival rates, and QOL and alleviated neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, anemia, liver injury, renal injury, and alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PBC alone, HCS plus PBC improved the clinical efficacy and alleviated the ADRs in advanced NSCLC patients. Considering the limitations of the included RCTs, high-quality trials with longer follow-ups are needed to further confirm the results.

Platinum versus immunotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, with early metastasis, highly malignant characteristics. Morbidity ranks 7th among all malignant tumors, and mortality ranks 6th. Esophageal adjuvant therapy can significantly improve overall survival in unresectable esophageal cancer patients. With the breakthrough and progress of immunotherapy, the possibility of curing esophageal cancer has greatly increased. Some clinical trials have reported that compared with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy, the use of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors alone can benefit patients and effectively prolong their overall survival. We compare the efficacy of single immunotherapy with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a reliable basis for clinicians. METHODS: We will search PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cancerlit, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for related studies published before December 1, 2019 without language restrictions. Two review authors will search and assess relevant studies independently. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs, and prospective cohort studies will be included. We will perform subgroup analysis in sex, age, ethnicity, and tumor stage of esophageal cancer patients. RESULTS: The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a basis for clinicians to formulate the best chemotherapy regimen for patients, as well as a research clue for clinical researchers in this field. The results of this study will expand the treatment options for esophageal patients, but due to the nature of the disease and intervention, large sample clinical trials are not abundant, so we will include some high-quality small sample trials, which may cause high heterogeneity. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020110012.

Pattern of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer (EC) known prognostic factors are not sufficient to predict either outcome or recurrence rate/site: to investigate EC recurrence patterns according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classes, could be beneficial for a more tailored adjuvant treatment and follow-up schedule. METHODS: 758 women diagnosed with EC, and a 5-years follow-up, were enrolled: they were divided into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classes (low LR, intermediate IR, intermediate-high I-HR, and highrisk HR) and surgically treated as recommended, followed by adjuvants therapies when appropriate. RESULTS: Higher recurrence rate (RR) was significantly detected (p < 0,001) in the HR group (40,3%) compared to LR (9,6%), IR (16,7%) and I-HR (17,1%). Recurrences were detected more frequently at distant sites (64%) compared to pelvic (25,3%) and lymph nodes (10,7%) recurrences (p < 0,0001): only in LR group, no differences were detected between local and distant recurrences. 5-Year distant-free (LR 99%, IR 94%,I-HR 86%, HR 88%) and local-free survivals (LR 99%, IR 100%,I-HR 98%, HR 95%) significantly differ between groups (p < 0,0001 and p = 0,003, respectively). Adjuvant therapy modifies RRs only in LR group (p = 0,01). CONCLUSION: To identify biological factors to stratify patients at higher risk of relapse is needed. Distant site relapse could be the main reason of endometrial cancer failure follow-up, independently or in addition to their risk class prognosis.

Socioeconomic disparity trends in diagnostic imaging, treatments, and survival for non-small cell lung cancer 2007-2016.

Socioeconomic status (SES) has led to treatment and survival disparities; however, limited data exist for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigates the impact of SES on NSCLC diagnostic imaging, treatment, and overall survival (OS), and describes temporal disparity trends. The Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Through linkage to administrative datasets, patients' demographics, imaging, treatment, and survival were obtained. Based on median household neighborhood income, the Ontario population was divided into five income quintiles (Q1-Q5; Q1 = lowest income). Multivariable regressions assessed SES association with OS, imaging, treatment receipt, and treatment delay, and their interaction with year of diagnosis to understand temporal trends. Endpoints were adjusted for demographics, stage and comorbidities, along with treatments and imaging for OS. A total of 50 542 patients were identified. Higher SES patients (Q5 vs. Q1) showed improved 5-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.92; P < .0001) and underwent greater magnetic resonance imaging head (stages IA-IV; odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32; P < .0001), lung resection (IA-IIIA; OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.43-1.74; P < .0001), platinum-based vinorelbine adjuvant chemotherapy (IB-IIIA; OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.39-1.92; P < .0001), palliative radiation (IV; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .023), and intravenous chemotherapy (IV; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.60; P < .0001). Lower SES patients underwent greater thoracic radiation (IA-IIIB; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94; P = .0003). Across 2007-2016, socioeconomic disparities remain largely unchanged (interaction P > .05) despite widening income inequality.

Salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: Analysis of clinical outcome and BRCA1/2 gene mutational status.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of recurrent ovarian cancer patients bearing isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy (SL). The prognostic role of clinicopathological variables and the mutational status of BRCA1/2 have also been investigated. METHODS: This retrospective, single-institutional study included women with platinum-sensitive lymph node recurrence underwent to SL between June 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of clinical parameters, and BRCA1/2 mutational status on post salvage lymphadenectomy progression-free survival (PSL-PFS). RESULTS: As of June 2019, the median follow-up after SL was 30 months, and the relapse has been documented in 48 (56.5%) patients. In the whole series, the median PSL-PFS was 21 months, and the 3-year PSL-PFS was 36.7%. The median PSL-PFS, according to patients with ILNR (N = 71) versus patients with lymph-nodes and other sites of disease (N = 14), was 27 months versus 12 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of variables conditioning PSL-PFS showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥12 months, normal Ca125 serum levels, and number of metastatic lymph-nodes ≤3 played a statistically significant favorable role. In multivariate analysis, PFI duration ≥12 months and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 were shown to keep their favorable, independent prognostic value on PSL-PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome. The BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.

Kanglaite injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 27 RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Kanglaite injection (KLT) is a broad-spectrum anti-tumor drug, which is extracted from the seeds of the Chinese medicinal herb Coix lacryma-jobi, and has been widely used for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the combined effects of Kanglaite injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) on patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve databases were searched from their inceptions until July 05, 2019. All the RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of Kanglaite injection plus PBC versus PBC alone were selected. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the primary endpoint, objective response rate (ORR), survival rate, quality of life (QOL), cellular immunity function, and toxicities were defined as the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs recruiting 2,243 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC were included. The results showed that, compared with PBC alone, Kanglaite injection plus PBC improved DCR (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.15-1.26, p < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.31-1.60, p < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, p = 0.03), QOL (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40, p < 0.00001), CD4+T cells (WMD = 4.86, 95% CI 4.00-5.73, p < 0.00001), CD4+/CD8+ ratio (WMD = 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.31, p < 0.002), and reduced severe toxicities by 59% (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.51, p < 0.00001). Most results were robust and the quality of evidence was from moderate to low. CONCLUSIONS: Kanglaite injection in combination with PBC showed significantly higher efficacy than PBC alone in the treatment of stage III/IV NSCLC. Moreover, the combination therapy can improve cellular immunity and attenuate the severe toxicities caused by chemotherapy. However, high-quality RCTs are warranted to further assess the effects of the combined therapy.

Compound Kushen injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials following the PRISMA guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Compound Kushen injection (CKI) is a commonly used anti-tumor Chinese patent medicine, which is extracted from Kushen (Radix Sophorae Flavescentis) and Baituling (Rhizoma Smilacis Glabrae) and has been widely prescribed as an add-on therapy to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy remain controversial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CKI in combination with PBC versus PBC alone will be retrieved and assessed for inclusion. Analyses will be performed using Review Manager 5.3, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 and Trial Sequential Analysis software. The disease control rate (DCR) will be defined as the primary outcome, and the objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL), survival rate, and toxicities will be the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Compound Kushen injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III/IV NSCLC. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of eligible randomized controlled trials will evaluate the effects of Compound Kushen injection as adjunctive therapy to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer, thus providing evidence to the clinical use of this combination therapy for the specific subsets of patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019134892.

Efficacy and safety of Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Shenqi Fuzheng injection (SFI) is a commonly used anti-cancer Chinese patent medicine and has long been prescribed as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy remain unclear. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted following the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Seven databases will be searched for relevant studies from their inception to the present date: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Databases. All randomized clinical trials comparing SFI in combination with PBC versus PBC alone will be retrieved and assessed for inclusion. Two researchers will independently perform the selection of the studies, data extraction, and synthesis. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used to evaluate the risk of bias of the RCTs. The primary endpoint is the disease control rate (DCR), the secondary outcomes are the objective response rate (ORR), survival rate, quality of life (QOL), cellular immune function, and toxicities. Review Manager 5.3 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Collaboration, 2014 Copenhagen, Denmark) will be used to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS: This study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of SFI combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III/IV NSCLC. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will evaluate the effects of SFI as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy in the patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer, thus providing evidence to the clinical application of this combination therapy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019137196.

Elemene injection as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Elemene injection is an anticancer Chinese patent medicine that is widely used for the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Its active ingredients are ß-, γ- and δ-elemene, which are extracted from Curcumaaromatica Salisb. (Curcumawenyujin Y.H. Chen & C. Ling). PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of Elemene injection as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 and Trial Sequential Analysis software. All RCTs comparing Elemene injection combined with PBC vs. PBC alone were selected and assessed for inclusion. The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the primary endpoint, and the objective Response rate (ORR), survival rate, quality of life (QOL), cellular immune function and toxicities were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: 15 RCTs recruiting 1,410 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC were included. The methodological quality of most included trials was low to moderate. Compared with PBC alone, Elemene injection plus PBC can improve DCR (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31, p < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.82, p < 0.00001), 1- and 2-year survival rates (RR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.59, p = 0.002; RR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.46, p = 0.002, respectively), QOL (RR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.32, p < 0.00001), CD4+T cell counts (WMD = 10.43, 95% CI 8.25 to 12.62, p < 0.00001), and the CD4+/CD8+ratio (WMD = 0.78, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.14, p < 0.0001) and can reduce severe toxicities by 58% (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Elemene injection is a safe and effective adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage III/IV NSCLC. Elemene injection can improve clinical efficacy, enhance cellular immune function and alleviate the toxicity of chemotherapy. High-quality RCTs with significant survival outcomes and longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm the results further.

Second-line treatment efficacy and toxicity in older vs. non-older patients with advanced gastric cancer: A multicentre real-world study.

OBJECTIVES: Although gastric cancer (GC) incidence rises with age, older patients are poorly represented in clinical trials, whose results are therefore difficult to translate into standard management of older patients. Purpose of this study was to compare clinico-pathological features and survival outcomes between older and non-older patients with advanced GC treated with at least two chemotherapy lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinico-pathological characteristics, basal values, and treatment data of older (≥70 years at second-line start) and non-older patients were compared using chi-square test or 2-tailed Fisher exact test. The Kaplan-Meier estimation was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), which were examined by log-rank test. RESULTS: Older patients represented 31.8% of the population (N = 868). Intestinal type was more frequent in older patients (P = .02). Poorly differentiated tumours were more often observed in non-older patients (P = .009). At stage IV diagnosis, the rate of liver metastases was higher in older patients (P = .02), while peritoneal spread was more represented in non-older patients (P = .002). Although older patients were more often treated with monotherapy (P = .001), they had similar PFS (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.71-1.03, P = .102) and OS (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.65-1.02, P = .08) compared to the non-older counterpart. No statistical differences were observed in treatment-related adverse events, hospital admissions, or further treatment lines between age groups. CONCLUSION: In our large cohort study, despite some differences in tumour characteristics and treatment intensity, no survival difference was found between older and non-older patients with advanced GC treated with at least two chemotherapy lines. Incidence of adverse events was similar between age groups.

Sorafenib plus topotecan versus placebo plus topotecan for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (TRIAS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiangiogenic therapy has known activity in ovarian cancer. The investigator-initiated randomised phase 2 TRIAS trial assessed the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib combined with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial at 20 sites in Germany. Patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer previously treated with two or fewer chemotherapy lines for recurrent disease were stratified (first vs later relapse) in block sizes of four and randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-generated response system to topotecan (1·25 mg/m2 on days 1-5) plus either oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice daily on days 6-15, repeated every 21 days for six cycles, followed by daily maintenance sorafenib or placebo for up to 1 year in patients without progression. Investigators and patients were masked to allocation of sorafenib or placebo; topotecan treatment was open label. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01047891. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2010, and Sept 19, 2013, 185 patients were enrolled, 174 of whom were randomly assigned: 85 to sorafenib and 89 to placebo. Two patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events before treatment and were excluded from analyses. 83 patients in the sorafenib group and 89 in the placebo group started treatment. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with sorafenib versus placebo (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83; p=0·0018). Median progression-free survival was 6·7 months (95% CI 5·8-7·6) with sorafenib versus 4·4 months (3·7-5·0) with placebo. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (57 [69%] of 83 patients in the sorafenib group vs 47 [53%] of 89 in the placebo group), neutropenia (46 [55%] vs 48 [54%]), and thrombocytopenia (23 [28%] vs 20 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (59%) of 83 sorafenib-treated patients and 45 (51%) of 89 placebo-treated patients. Of these, events were fatal in four patients (5%) in the sorafenib group (dyspnoea and poor general condition, septic shock, ascites and dyspnoea, and sigma perforation) and seven (8%) in the placebo group (pulmonary embolism in two patients, disease progression in two patients, and one case each of sepsis with fever, pleural effusion, and tumour cachexia). Sorafenib was associated with increased incidences of grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (three [13%] vs 0 patients) and grade 2 alopecia (24 [29%] vs 12 [13%]). INTERPRETATION: Sorafenib, when given orally in combination with topotecan and continued as maintenance therapy, showed a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival in women with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. These encouraging results support the crucial role of antiangiogenesis as the treatment backbone in combination with chemotherapy, making this approach attractive for further assessment with other targeted strategies. FUNDING: Bayer, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Occupational exposure to platinum drugs during intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Biomonitoring and surface contamination.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been introduced over the last decade for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this procedure, heated cytotoxic drugs are administered directly into the abdominal cavity, ensuring cancer cells to be exposed while reducing systemic toxicity. More recently, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), where the chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the peritoneal cavity as an aerosol under pressure, has been proposed to patients in palliative situation, as a new approach. The amount of drug used is up to 10 fold lower than in HIPEC. The use of cytotoxic drugs poses an occupational risk for the operating room personnel. This study investigated the potential exposure of the medical staff by biomonitoring and surface contamination measurements, during a HIPEC procedure and a PIPAC procedure. METHOD: Wipe samples were collected from various locations in operating rooms including gloves, hands, devices and floor. Urines samples were collected from 10 volunteers of the medical staff and from a control group. The platinum analysis was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Significant contaminations were observed on the floor, gloves, shoes and devices. However, urinary platinum was below the limit of quantification (<10 ng/L) for more than 50% of samples from the healthcare workers performing HIPEC and PIPAC. Concentrations did not differ significantly from those reported for the control group. CONCLUSION: There appears to be little risk of exposure to platinum drugs during HIPEC and PIPAC providing the adequate safety measures are implemented.

De-escalating and escalating systemic therapy in triple negative breast cancer.

Triple negative breast cancer has the highest relapse risk of all the clinical subsets, although the escalation of chemotherapy has benefited this subset substantially over recent years. Systemic options are limited to chemotherapy, which makes meaningful de-escalation or escalation of therapy more challenging but possible. Observational cohorts suggest a less than 10% risk of relapse and minimal if any benefit of chemotherapy in very small (<1 cm), node-negative triple negative disease. In higher risk, particularly node-positive disease, anthracycline/taxane-based regimens remain standard. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy clearly de-escalates surgery, although there are insufficient data to give less than standard chemotherapy on the basis of response to neoadjuvant therapy. Efforts to meaningfully escalate therapy in high-risk disease have included incorporating platinums into Neoadjuvant therapy, with clear benefit in pCR but uncertain impact on relapse and survival at this time. Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy carries a particularly poor prognosis; a recent randomized trial of 6 months' capecitabine in this setting suggested a survival advantage to this approach in higher risk residual disease. While not validated at this time, future directions are likely to include biologic prognostication with tumor and immune variables, as well as targeted non-cytotoxic approaches leveraging the molecular heterogeneity of triple negative disease.

Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity profile associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy use in older women.

OBJECTIVE: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy (CT) for treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been shown to provide a substantial OS advantage. This study aims to compare the toxicity and benefits of IP CT in patients ≥70 with those <70. METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients diagnosed with Stage IIA-IIIC EOC from 2000 to 2013 who received IP CT. Clinicopathologic characteristics were extracted, and survival was calculated. RESULTS: 133 patients were included with 100 pts. <70years old and 33 pts. ≥70years old. Clinical trial enrollment was similar despite age. In trial enrolled patients, older patients received statistically fewer cycles of therapy (6.4 vs 5.8, p=0.002) but had similar dose delays (0.9 vs 0.7, p=0.72), and modifications (0.9 vs 0.36, p=0.11). Median PFS (27 vs 31months) and OS (71 and 62months) were not statistically different. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was significantly worse in the older patients (82% vs 100%, p=0.04). Neuropathy grade ≥2 and other non-hematologic toxicities were not different between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite completing fewer cycles of IP CT, older EOC patients had comparable survival to younger patients. The population of older patients receiving IP CT in this study were on clinical trial and likely to be heartier than the general older population. IP CT appears well tolerated and effective among select older patients and is likely under-utilized outside of clinical trials.

Response to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibodies in men treated for platinum refractory germ cell cancer relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with platinum refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCT) relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are limited and survival is poor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are currently assessed within clinical trials. We present updated data on our experience with checkpoint inhibitors as a compassionate use off-label treatment attempt for highly-pretreated patients with GCT and provide an overview of the current literature on PD-L1 expression in this rare tumour entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed all patients with platinum refractory GCT treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institutions between 2015 and 2017. Data were retrieved retrospectively from the patient charts. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Four patients received single-dose treatment and died shortly afterwards due to tumour progression; the remaining three patients received treatment for at least 6 months. No significant treatment toxicity was observed. Long-term tumour response was achieved in two of the three patients, both of them highly positive for PD-L1 staining. INTERPRETATION: We consider checkpoint inhibition to be efficient in carefully selected patients with platinum refractory GCT. However, predictive markers associated with tumour response are not yet known and larger prospective clinical trials are warranted.