Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urol ; 205(1): 115-121, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658588

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Optimal treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer remains unclear. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines recommend active surveillance, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Recent trials demonstrated no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer compared to prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The use of active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer is less clear. In this study we characterize U.S. national trends for demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with active surveillance for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 176,122 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate risk prostate cancer and association with the use of active surveillance were characterized. The analysis was performed in April 2020. RESULTS: In total, 176,122 men were identified with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these men 57.3% underwent prostatectomy, 36.4% underwent radiotherapy and 3.2% underwent active surveillance. Active surveillance nearly tripled from 1.6% in 2010 to 4.6% in 2016 (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis use of active surveillance was associated with older age, diagnosis in recent years, lower Gleason score and tumor stage, type of insurance, treatment at an academic center and proximity to facility, and attaining higher education (p <0.05). Race and comorbidities were not associated with active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight increasing active surveillance use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer demonstrating clinical and socioeconomic disparities. Prospective data and improved risk stratification are needed to guide optimal treatment for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Calicreínas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/economia , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Radioterapia/economia , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Conduta Expectante/economia
2.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 10313, 2020 06 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32587285

RESUMO

In this study using national health insurance data, we investigated the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke among prostate cancer (PC) survivors compared with the general population, as well as the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to primary treatment. A total of 48,298 PC patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2013 were included and matched to non-cancer controls. Compared to the general population, PC survivors had a slightly lower risk of IHD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.96) or stroke (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.95). Especially, survivors who underwent surgery had lower risks of IHD (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.80) or stroke (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.81). Compared to survivors in the active surveillance/watchful waiting group, the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) group had a significantly greater risk of stroke (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32), but the IHD risk was not significantly elevated (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.29). In conclusion, PC survivors had a slightly lower risk of CVD compared to the general population, which was attributable to self-selection for PSA screening, specifically in the surgery-only group. CVD risk was dependent on treatment received, and attention should be given to patients who receive ADT.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Cancer ; 125(18): 3164-3171, 2019 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31150125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Certain patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may be appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS). In the current study, the authors sought to characterize AS use and early mortality outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk PCa in the United States. METHODS: The novel Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting database identified 52,940 men diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk PCa (cT2b-c, Gleason score of 7, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 10-20 ng/mL) and actively managed (AS, radiotherapy, or radical prostatectomy) from 2010 through 2015. The Cuzick test assessed AS time trends, and logistic multivariable regression characterized features associated with AS. Fine-Gray and Cox modeling determined PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: The rate of AS increased from 3.7% in 2010 to 7.3% in 2015, and from 7.2% to 11.7% among men aged ≥70 years. Among men with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, the use of AS increased from 7.2% to 14.9% and from 2.2% to 3.8%, respectively (all P value for trend, <.001). The mean age of those patients managed with AS decreased from 69.9 years to 67.9 years (P = .0004). Factors found to be associated with AS included favorable risk disease; black race; higher socioeconomic status; older age; and diagnosis in the West, Northwest, or Midwest regions of the United States. The 5-year PCSM rate was comparable to AS versus treatment among patients with low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, but was worse with AS among those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (PCSM, 1.3% vs 0.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.11-5.50; P = .026]) and intermediate-risk disease overall (PCSM, 1.1% vs 0.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.25-4.37; P = .008]). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AS for patients with intermediate-risk PCa is increasing across the United States, particularly for older men and those with favorable intermediate-risk disease. Early estimates of cancer-specific and overall mortality rates are low with AS, although significantly higher compared with treatment.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radioterapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Análise Multivariada , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Risco , Programa de SEER
4.
Urology ; 130: 72-78, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31029668

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the 3-year outcomes of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance (AS) in a cohort of geographically diverse community-based urology practices. AS is the management of choice for a majority of men with lower risk prostate cancer.1,2,3 Little is known about the contemporary "real-world" follow-up and adherence rates in the most common setting of urologic care, community (private) practice.4 METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes for men diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and May 31, 2014 with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) very low, low and intermediate risk prostate cancer who selected AS in 9 large community urology practices. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to describe associations between race, age, insurance status, family history, comorbidity, clinical stage, Gleason score, NCCN risk-group, and PSA density with discontinuation of AS. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-eight men on AS were followed for a median of 3.35 years. 89% (492) continued to follow-up with diagnosing practice. 32% (171) discontinued AS. On multivariate analysis, increasing NCCN risk classification (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, P = 0.02 and HR 2.09, P < 0.01 for low and intermediate risk vs very low risk) was significantly associated with discontinuation. Among those who discontinued AS, surgery and radiation were utilized equally (47% and 53%, respectively, P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: In this community-based cohort of men on AS, a minority was lost to follow-up and adherence to AS was similar to other reports. Disease characteristics more than sociodemographic characteristics correlated with adherence to AS, while surgery and radiotherapy were utilized equally among those discontinuing AS, both suggesting guideline concordant practice of medicine.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
5.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 98(4): 423-432, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30511739

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is debate about optimal management of pregnancies with a large-for-gestational age baby. A recent randomized controlled trial reported that early term induction of labor reduced cesarean section rates and infant morbidity. However, long term childhood outcomes have not been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess maternal, neonatal and child health and education outcomes for large-for-gestational age babies induced at 37-38 weeks' gestation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population-based record linkage study of term (37+ weeks), cephalic-presenting singleton pregnancies with a large-for-gestational age baby in New South Wales, Australia, 2002-2006. Linked birth, hospital, mortality and education data were used with at least 9 years follow up from birth. Exposure was induction of labor at 37-38 weeks, compared to expectant management (spontaneous birth at ≥37 weeks and planned births at ≥39 weeks). Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Modified Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: Among 10 174 eligible pregnancies, 412 (4.0%) had an induction at 37-38 weeks. Women in the induction group were less likely to have a cesarean section (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82). Infants had higher rates of: low Apgar scores, birth trauma, neonatal jaundice and phototherapy use, and admission to special care nursery or neonatal intensive care than their expectantly managed counterparts. As children, they had higher rates of hospital admission (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.30) and special needs (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.12-3.50). However, by age 8 there was no difference in overall literacy and numeracy achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Although women who had an early term labor induction with large-for-gestational age were less likely to have a cesarean section, the increased risk of neonatal morbidities and additional healthcare utilization suggests the need for caution in early induction of large-for-gestational age babies before 39 weeks' gestation.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Saúde da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Escolaridade , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/etiologia , New South Wales , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 44(6): 1049-1056, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516643

RESUMO

AIM: Elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) have been linked to placental dysfunction and associated morbidities. We aimed to compare the induction of labor with expectant management at term in those pregnancies for the prevention of neonatal and maternal morbidities. METHODS: Women with second trimester HCG ≥ 2 and/or AFP ≥ 2 multiples of the median, without additional maternal or fetal complications, from their 38th gestational week were offered the choice of labor induction or expectant management. The primary outcomes were maternal composite outcome (composed of cesarean deliveries, pre-eclampsia or placental abruption) and neonatal composite outcome (composed of antenatal or neonatal death, Apgar score at 5 min < 7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, need for phototherapy, respiratory abnormalities, birth trauma or neonatal infection). RESULTS: Of 305 women, 124 women chose to undergo labor induction, and 181 women chose expectant management. The composite maternal outcome in the expectant management group was twice the rate of the labor induction group, although it did not reach statistical significance (18 [10%] vs 6 [5%]; P = 0.1; relative risk [expectant/induced] 2.04; 95% confidence interval 0.8-5.0). Increased rate of phototherapy led to increased neonatal composite outcomes in the labor induction group compared with the expectant management group (34 [27%] vs 27 [15%], respectively = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In pregnancies with elevated AFP and/or HCG, early term labor induction initiated a trend towards improvement in maternal outcome but increased the rate of mild neonatal morbidity. The statistical insignificance of the large effect on the maternal outcome might reflect the lack of statistical power. Further research is needed to address this limitation.


Assuntos
Descolamento Prematuro da Placenta/epidemiologia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Gonadotropina Coriônica/sangue , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez/sangue , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análise , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
7.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 16(4): e719-e727, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29483045

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) is one recommended option for low-risk prostate cancer and involves close follow-up and monitoring. Our objective was to determine whether non-clinical trial patients adhere to AS protocols and how many are lost to follow-up (LTFU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who initiated AS at Los Angeles County Hospital (LAC) and University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (Norris) between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2015. Competing-risks regression analyses examined the difference in LTFU rates of AS patients in the 2 institutions and examined the association between LTFU and patient characteristics. We used California Cancer Registry data to verify if patients LTFU were monitored and/or treated at other LAC medical facilities. RESULTS: We found 116 patients at LAC and 98 at Norris who met the AS criteria for this study. Patients at LAC and Norris had similar tumor characteristics but differed in median income, race, primary language spoken, distance residing from hospital, and socioeconomic status (SES). LTFU was significantly different between the institutions: 57 ± 7% at LAC and 32 ± 6% at Norris at 5 years (P < .001). By multivariable analysis, the main determinant of LTFU was SES (P = .045). By 5 years, the chance of an LAC patient remaining on AS was 8 ± 6% compared to 20 ± 6% for a Norris patient (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Successful AS implementation relies on patient follow-up. We found that patients on AS from lower SES strata are more often LTFU. Identifying barriers to follow-up and compliance among low SES patients is critical to ensure optimal AS.


Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Perda de Seguimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança
8.
Am J Manag Care ; 24(1 Suppl): S4-S10, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29337486

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) has been widely implemented within Veterans Affairs' medical centers (VAMCs) as a standard of care for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patient characteristics such as age, race, and Agent Orange (AO) exposure may influence advisability of AS in veterans. The 17-gene assay may improve risk stratification and management selection. OBJECTIVES: To compare management strategies for PCa at 6 VAMCs before and after introduction of the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed records of patients diagnosed with PCa between 2013 and 2014 to identify management patterns in an untested cohort. From 2015 to 2016, these patients received GPS testing in a prospective study. Charts from 6 months post biopsy were reviewed for both cohorts to compare management received in the untested and tested cohorts. SUBJECTS: Men who just received their diagnosis and have National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) very low-, low-, and select cases of intermediate-risk PCa. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were generally similar in the untested and tested cohorts. AS utilization was 12% higher in the tested cohort compared with the untested cohort. In men younger than 60 years, utilization of AS in tested men was 33% higher than in untested men. AS in tested men was higher across all NCCN risk groups and races, particular in low-risk men (72% vs 90% for untested vs tested, respectively). Tested veterans exposed to AO received less AS than untested veterans. Tested nonexposed veterans received 19% more AS than untested veterans. Median GPS results did not significantly differ as a factor of race or AO exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Men who receive GPS testing are more likely to utilize AS within the year post diagnosis, regardless of age, race, and NCCN risk group. Median GPS was similar across racial groups and AO exposure groups, suggesting similar biology across these groups. The GPS assay may be a useful tool to refine risk assessment of PCa and increase rates of AS among clinically and biologically low-risk patients, which is in line with guideline-based care.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Marcadores Genéticos , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 26(12): 1781-1787, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28939587

RESUMO

Background: Recent data suggest that neuroendocrine signaling pathways may play a role in the progression of prostate cancer, particularly for early-stage disease. We aimed to explore whether expression of selected genes in the adrenergic, serotoninergic, glucocorticoid, and dopaminergic pathways differs in prostate tumor tissue from men with lethal disease compared with men with nonlethal disease.Methods: On the basis of the Swedish Watchful Waiting Cohort, we included 511 men diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer through transurethral resection of the prostate during 1977-1998 with follow-up up to 30 years. For those with tumor tissue (N = 262), we measured mRNA expression of 223 selected genes included in neuroendocrine pathways. Using DNA from normal prostate tissue (N = 396), we genotyped 36 SNPs from 14 receptor genes. Lethal prostate cancer was the primary outcome in analyses with pathway gene expression and genetic variants.Results: Differential expression of genes in the serotoninergic pathway was associated with risk of lethal prostate cancer (P = 0.007); similar but weaker associations were noted for the adrenergic (P = 0.014) and glucocorticoid (P = 0.020) pathways. Variants of the HTR2A (rs2296972; P = 0.002) and NR3CI (rs33388; P = 0.035) genes (within the serotoninergic and glucocorticoid pathways) were associated with lethal cancer in overdominant models. These genetic variants were correlated with expression of several genes in corresponding pathways (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Our findings lend support to hypothesis that the neuroendocrine pathways, particularly serotoninergic pathway, are associated with lethal outcome in the natural course of localized prostate cancer.Impact: This study provides evidence of the role of neuroendocrine pathways in prostate cancer progression that may have clinical utility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1781-7. ©2017 AACR.


Assuntos
Sistemas Neurossecretores/metabolismo , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Progressão da Doença , Seguimentos , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 48(5): 812-816, 2016 10 18.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27752161

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical pathological characteristics and improve the recognition in the diagnosis and treatment of incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer. METHODS: Seven hundred and seventy-one patients who underwent TURP from May 2004 to September 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. In our institution, TURP specimens should be totally submitted in an extensive sampling method. The tumor area was outlined by estimation of an experienced genitourinary pathologist and calculated by the image analysis system software (Image J 1.47 h). The tumor area was then multiplied by the thickness of tissue. The total sum of all tumor volume was the estimated tumor volume. The clinical and pathological factors, follow-up results were obtained and we aimed to collect information about the period of watchful waiting (WW), PSA progression status, intervention status during the follow-up, the reason for intervention on WW and the type of intervention. RESULTS: The average age of 771 patients was (71.3±5.9) years old, and the average BMI was (23.9±3.1) kg/m2, preoperative average tPSA was (4.4±2.8) µg/L. Eighty-six (11.2%) cases of incidental prostate cancer were detected. The patients in T1a group (77 cases, 89.5%) had tumor volumes of (12.3±12.6) mm3, and the patients in T1b group had tumor volumes of (105.1±41.8) mm3.The range of tumor volume was 0.4-180.2 mm3. The volume of all the 86 cases was less than 500 mm3 as the threshold of insignificant cancer. All the patients were managed by WW. The mean follow-up time was 88.9 (27.9-150.1) months.The Gleason score was <7 in 79 patients, and ≥7 in 7 patients. There was no significant difference in age, preoperative tPSA, preoperative PSAD, postoperative tPSA, prostate volume and TURP resection between T1a group and T1b group (P>0.05). Among 84 patients without follow-up losts, PSA progression occurred in 5 patients. One T1a patient underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) as an intervention, and 3 patients underwent hormone therapy. One patient in T1b group underwent radiotherapy for PSA progression and one was treated because of patient preference without evidence of disease progression. There were no patients who died due to prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Eighty-six (11.2%) cases of incidental prostate cancer were detected. The tumor volume of all the cases was insignificant cancer.The clinical outcomes of IPCa were satisfactory with the initial treatment of WW in the Chinese population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Carga Tumoral , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Urology ; 93: 60-7, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26876460

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To measure past active surveillance (AS) adoption rates, institute the best practice, and measure the AS adoption rates following implementation. We report our findings over a 3-year period. METHODS: Patient prostate needle biopsy and treatment data from the period August 2011 to August 2014 were retrieved from an integrated electronic medical records (Allscripts) and stored in a Microsoft Access database for analysis. Structured data were queried using the automated software program WizMD and unstructured data were abstracted by manual review. AS adoption was calculated according to four different selection criteria. Between 2013 and 2014, physicians at Genesis Healthcare Partners (GHP) underwent an educational training program on the University of California, San Diego/GHP AS best practice for managing low-risk prostate cancer patients and were provided report cards on their AS adoption and comparative reporting. RESULTS: AS adoption increased for the 3 years of the study. AS adoption for all newly diagnosed patients managed at GHP increased from 12.9% to 14.74%. AS adoption for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network) increased from 31.90% to 58.46% from year 1 to year 3 of the study (P < .001), and AS adoption for the most strict (restrictive) criteria increased from 43.75% to 82.61% (P < .001) after the educational and comparative reporting intervention. CONCLUSION: These data highlight the potential benefit of physician education and comparative reporting to enhance AS adoption. AS adoption rates vary according to selection criteria used for analysis. Carefully selected outcomes from evidence-based guidelines have the potential to enhance medical quality.


Assuntos
Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Urologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Melhoria de Qualidade
12.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 39(1): 55-63, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24390274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer was concordant with nationally recognized guidelines using supplemented cancer registry data and what factors were associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. METHODS: Initial therapy for 8229 nonmetastatic prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 from cancer registries in 7 states was abstracted as part of the Centers for Disease Control's Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer study conducted during 2007 to 2009. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines version 1.2002 was used as the standard of care based on recurrence risk group and life expectancy (LE). A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. RESULTS: Nearly 80% with nonmetastatic prostate cancer received guideline-concordant care for initial therapy. Receipt of nonguideline-concordant care (including receiving either less aggressive therapy or more aggressive therapy than indicated) was related to older age, African American race/ethnicity, being unmarried, rural residence, and especially to being in the high recurrence risk group where receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated occurred more often than receiving more aggressive therapy (adjusted OR=4.2; 95% CL, 3.5-5.2 vs. low-risk group). Compared with life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity, physicians tended to underestimate LE. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of less aggressive therapy than indicated among high-risk group men with >5-year LE based on life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity was a concern. Physicians may tend to underestimate 5-year survival among this group and should be alerted to the importance of recommending aggressive therapy when warranted. However, based on more recent guidelines, among those with low-risk disease, the proportion considered to be receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated may now be lower because active surveillance is now considered appropriate.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Scand J Urol ; 49(1): 43-50, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25363612

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evidence supports active surveillance (AS) as a means to reduce overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The consequences of close and long-standing follow-up with regard to outpatient visits, tests and repeated biopsies are widely unknown. This study investigated the trajectory and costs of AS in patients with localized PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 317 PCa patients were followed in a prospective, single-arm AS cohort. The primary outcomes were number of patient contacts, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, biopsies, hospital admissions due to biopsy complications and patients eventually undergoing curative treatment. The secondary outcome was cost. RESULTS: The 5 year cumulative incidence of discontinued AS in a competing-risk model was 40%. During the first 5 years of AS patients underwent a median of two biopsy sets, and patients were seen in an outpatient clinic including PSA testing three to four times annually. In total, 38 of the 406 biopsy sessions led to hospital admission and 87 of the 317 patients required treatment for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). With a median of 3.7 years' follow-up, the total cost of AS was euro (€) 1,240,286. Assuming all patients had otherwise undergone primary radical prostatectomy, the cost difference favoured AS with a net benefit of €662,661 (35% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: AS entails a close clinical follow-up with a considerable risk of rebiopsy complication, treatment of BOO and subsequent delayed definitive therapy. This risk should be weighed against a potential economic benefit and reduction in the risk of overtreatment compared to immediate radical treatment.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/efeitos adversos , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca , Gerenciamento Clínico , Progressão da Doença , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Conduta Expectante/economia
14.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 23(10): 2009-2018, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25063519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: HIV-infected (HIV(+)) men face cancer treatment disparities that impact outcome. Prostate cancer treatment and treatment appropriateness in HIV(+) men are unknown. METHODS: We used electronic chart review to conduct a retrospective cohort study of 43 HIV(+) cases with prostate cancer and 86 age- and race-matched HIV-uninfected (HIV(-)) controls with prostate cancer, ages 40 to 79 years, from 2001 to 2012. We defined treatment appropriateness using National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) to estimate life expectancy. RESULTS: Median age was 59.5 years at prostate cancer diagnosis. Median CD4(+) T-cell count was 459.5 cells/mm(3), 95.3% received antiretroviral therapy, and 87.1% were virally suppressed. Radical prostatectomy was the primary treatment for 39.5% of HIV(+) and 71.0% of HIV(-) men (P = 0.004). Only 16.3% of HIV(+) versus 57.0% of HIV(-) men received open radical prostatectomy (P < 0.001). HIV(+) men received more radiotherapy (25.6% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.13). HIV was negatively associated with open radical prostatectomy (OR = 0.03, P = 0.007), adjusting for insurance and CCI. No men were undertreated. Fewer HIV(+) men received appropriate treatment (89.2% vs. 100%, P = 0.003), due to four overtreated HIV(+) men. Excluding AIDS from the CCI still resulted in fewer HIV(+) men receiving appropriate treatment (94.6% vs. 100%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer in HIV(+) men is largely appropriately treated. Under- or overtreatment may occur from difficulties in life expectancy estimation. HIV(+) men may receive more radiotherapy and fewer radical prostatectomies, specifically open radical prostatectomies. IMPACT: Research on HIV/AIDS survival indices and etiologies and outcomes of this prostate cancer treatment disparity in HIV(+) men are needed.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Med J Aust ; 198(10): 540-5, 2013 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23725268

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria, Australia, between 2008 and 2011. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at 11 public and six private hospitals in Victoria from August 2008 to February 2011, and for whom prostate cancer notifications were received by the Prostate Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of men diagnosed with prostate cancer; details of treatment provided within 12 months of diagnosis, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk categories; and characteristics of men who did not receive active treatment within 12 months of diagnosis. RESULTS: Treatment details were collected for 98.1% of men who were assessed as eligible to participate in the study (2724/2776) and were confirmed by telephone 12 months after diagnosis for 74.4% of them (2027/2724). Most patients (2531/2724 [92.9%]) were diagnosed with clinically localised disease, of whom 1201 (47.5%) were at intermediate risk of disease progression. Within 12 months of diagnosis, 299 of the 736 patients (40.6%) who had been diagnosed as having disease that was at low risk of progression had received no active treatment, and 72 of 594 patients (12.1%) who had been diagnosed as having disease that was at high risk of progression had received no active treatment. Of those diagnosed as having intermediate risk of disease progression, 54.5% (655/1201) had undergone radical prostatectomy. Those who received no active treatment were more likely than those who received active treatment to be older (odds ratio [95% CI], 2.96 [2.01-4.38], 10.94 [6.96-17.21] and 32.76 [15.84-67.89], respectively, for age 65-74 2013s, 75-84 2013s and ≥ 85 2013s, compared with < 55 2013s), to have less advanced disease (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.20 [0.16-0.26], 0.09 [0.06-0.12] and 0.05 [0.02-0.90], respectively, for intermediate, high and very high-risk [locally advanced] or metastatic disease, compared with low-risk disease) and to have had their prostate cancer notified by a private hospital (odds ratio [95% CI], 1.35 [1.10-1.66], compared with public hospital). CONCLUSION: Our data reveal a considerable "stage migration" towards earlier diagnosis of prostate cancer in Victoria and a large increase in the use of radical prostatectomy among men with clinically localised disease.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Braquiterapia/tendências , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prostatectomia/tendências , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Sistema de Registros , Vitória , Conduta Expectante/tendências
16.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 53(6): 1113-6, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22098406

RESUMO

We aimed to characterize surveillance imaging and circumstances of relapse for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Outcomes Database, a prospective cohort study collecting clinical and outcome data at seven comprehensive cancer centers. Patients presenting with newly diagnosed DLBCL in remission ≥3 months after initial therapy and who had accrued 2 years of follow-up were eligible for analysis (n = 625). The median number of imaging studies was 2.5/year (institutional range 0.5-3.5, p < 0.0001); 48.4% received only dedicated computed tomography (CT) scans, 14.6% received only positron emission tomography (PET)-inclusive modalities, 32.8% received a combination and 4.2% received no imaging. Among all eligible patients, 50 (8.0%) experienced relapse, and approximately one-quarter of subclinical relapses were detected through routine imaging. Our results suggest that despite limited data regarding its effect on outcomes, surveillance imaging is prevalent in DLBCL, and a majority of patients receive PET scans at some point during follow-up.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Diagnóstico por Imagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA