Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Nutr ; 40(4): 2100-2108, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33077271

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in medical and surgical inpatients is an on-going problem. More-2-Eat (M2E) Phase 1 demonstrated that improved detection and treatment of hospital malnutrition could be embedded into routine practice using an intensive researcher-facilitated implementation process. Yet, spreading and sustaining new practices in diverse hospital cultures with minimal researcher support is unknown. AIMS: To demonstrate that a scalable model of implementation can increase three key nutrition practices (admission screening; Subjective Global Assessment (SGA); and medication pass (MedPass) of oral nutritional supplement) in diverse acute care hospitals to detect and treat malnutrition in medical and surgical patients. METHODS: Ten hospitals participated in this pretest post-test time series implementation study from across Canada, including 21 medical or surgical units (Phase 1 original units (n = 4), Phase 1 hospital new units (n = 9), Phase 2 new hospitals and units (n = 8)). The scalable implementation model included: training champions on implementation strategies and providing them with education resources for teams; creating a self-directed audit and feedback process; and providing mentorship. Standardized audits of all patients on the study unit on an audit day were completed bi-monthly to track nutrition care activities since admission. Bivariate comparisons were performed by time period (initial, mid-term and final audits). Run-charts depicted the trajectory of change and qualitatively compared to Phase 1. RESULTS: 5158 patient charts were audited over the course of 18-months. Admission nutrition screening rates increased from 50% to 84% (p < 0.0001). New Phase 1 units more readily implemented screening than Phase 2 sites, and the original Phase 1 units generally sustained screening practices from Phase 1. SGA was a sustained practice at Phase 1 hospitals including in new Phase 1 units. The new Phase 2 units improved completion of SGA but did not reach the levels of Phase 1 units (original or new). MedPass almost doubled over the time periods (7%-13% of all patients p < 0.007). Other care practices significantly increased (e.g. volunteer mealtime assistance). CONCLUSION: Nutrition-care activities significantly increased in diverse hospital units with this scalable model. This heralds the transition from implementation research to sustained changes in routine practice. Screening, SGA, and MedPass can all be implemented, improve nutrition care for all patients, spread within an organization, and for the most part, sustained (and in the case of original Phase 1 units, for over 3 years) with champion leadership.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Desnutrição/diagnóstico , Desnutrição/terapia , Programas de Rastreamento , Avaliação Nutricional , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Custos e Análise de Custo , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Feminino , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/métodos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Nutricional
2.
Crit Care Med ; 48(12): 1752-1759, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Growing evidence supports the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management, and Early exercise/mobility (ABCDE) bundle processes as improving a number of short- and long-term clinical outcomes for patients requiring ICU care. To assess the cost-effectiveness of this intervention, we determined the impact of ABCDE bundle adherence on inpatient and 1-year mortality, quality-adjusted life-years, length of stay, and costs of care. DESIGN: We conducted a 2-year, prospective, cost-effectiveness study in 12 adult ICUs in six hospitals belonging to a large, integrated healthcare delivery system. SETTING: Hospitals included a large, urban tertiary referral center and five community hospitals. ICUs included medical/surgical, trauma, neurologic, and cardiac care units. PATIENTS: The study included 2,953 patients, 18 years old or older, with an ICU stay greater than 24 hours, who were on a ventilator for more than 24 hours and less than 14 days. INTERVENTION: ABCDE bundle. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used propensity score-adjusted regression models to determine the impact of high bundle adherence on inpatient mortality, discharge status, length of stay, and costs. A Markov model was used to estimate the potential effect of improved bundle adherence on healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years in the year following ICU admission. We found that patients with high ABCDE bundle adherence (≥ 60%) had significantly decreased odds of inpatient mortality (odds ratio 0.28) and significantly higher costs ($3,920) of inpatient care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of high bundle adherence was $15,077 (95% CI, $13,675-$16,479) per life saved and $1,057 per life-year saved. High bundle adherence was associated with a 0.12 increase in quality-adjusted life-years, a $4,949 increase in 1-year care costs, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $42,120 per quality-adjusted life-year. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCDE bundle appears to be a cost-effective means to reduce in-hospital and 1-year mortality for patients with an ICU stay.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/mortalidade , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(8): e2013913, 2020 08 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822492

RESUMO

Importance: Delays in transfer for discharge-ready patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) are increasingly described and contribute to strained capacity. Objective: To describe the epidemiological features and health care costs attributable to potentially avoidable delays in ICU discharge in a large integrated health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study was performed in 17 adult ICUs in Alberta, Canada, from June 19, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Participants were patients 15 years or older admitted to a study ICU during the study period. Data were analyzed from October 19, 2018, to May 20, 2020. Exposures: Avoidable time in the ICU, defined as the portion of total ICU patient-days accounted for by avoidable delay in ICU discharge (eg, waiting for a ward bed). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was health care costs attributable to avoidable time in the ICU. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with avoidable time, in-hospital mortality, and measures of use of health care resources, including the number of hours in the ICU and the number of days of hospitalization. Multilevel mixed multivariable regression was used to assess associations between avoidable time and outcomes. Results: In total, 28 904 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.3 [16.8] years; 18 030 male [62.4%]) were included. Of these, 19 964 patients (69.1%) had avoidable time during their ICU admission. The median avoidable time per patient was 7.2 (interquartile range, 2.4-27.7) hours. In multivariable analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98), comorbid hemiplegia or paraplegia (OR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23-1.75), liver disease (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37), admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03), surgical status (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98), medium community hospital type (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.32), and admission year (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13-1.19) were associated with avoidable time. The cumulative avoidable time was 19 373.9 days, with estimated attributable costs of CAD$34 323 522. Avoidable time accounted for 12.8% of total ICU bed-days and 6.4% of total ICU costs. Patients with avoidable time before ICU discharge showed higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (1115 [5.6%] vs 392 [4.4%]; P < .001); however, in multivariable analysis, avoidable time was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, potentially avoidable discharge delay occurred for most patients admitted to ICUs across a large integrated health system and translated into substantial associated health care costs.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Alberta , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/economia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
BMC Pediatr ; 19(1): 53, 2019 02 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744649

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of hemolytic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NHB) is not well characterized, and economic burden at the population level is poorly understood. This study evaluated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and economic burden of hemolytic NHB newborns receiving treatment in U.S. real-world settings. METHODS: This cohort study used administrative claims from 01/01/2011 to 08/31/2017. The treated cohort had hemolytic NHB diagnosis and received phototherapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or exchange transfusions. They were matched with non-NHB newborns who had neither NHB nor related treatments on the following: delivery hospital/area, gender, delivery route, estimated gestational age (GA), health plan eligibility, and closest date of birth within 5 years. Inferential statistics were reported. RESULTS: The annual NHB prevalence was 29.6 to 31.7%; hemolytic NHB, 1.8 to 2.4%; treated hemolytic NHB, 0.46 to 0.55%, between 2011 and 2016. The matched analysis included 1373 pairs ≥35 weeks GA. The treated hemolytic NHB cohort had significantly more birth trauma and hemorrhage (4.5% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.003), vacuum extractor affecting newborn (1.9% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.014), and polycythemia neonatorum (0.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) than the matched non-NHB cohort. The treated hemolytic NHB cohort also had significantly longer mean birth hospital stays (4.5 vs. 3.0 days, p < 0.001), higher level 2-4 neonatal intensive care admissions (15.7% vs. 2.4, 15.9% vs. 2.8 and 10.6% vs. 2.5%, respectively, all p < 0.001) and higher 30-day readmission (8.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). One-month and one-year average total costs of care were significantly higher for the treated hemolytic NHB cohort vs. the matched non-NHB cohort, $14,405 vs. $5527 (p < 0.001) and $21,556 vs. $12,986 (p < 0.001), respectively. The average costs for 30-day readmission among newborns who readmitted were $13,593 for the treated hemolytic NHB cohort and $3638 for the matched non-NHB cohort, p < 0.001. The authors extrapolated GA-adjusted prevalence of treated hemolytic NHB in the U.S. newborn population ≥ 35 weeks GA and estimated an incremental healthcare expenditure of $177.0 million during the first month after birth in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of treated hemolytic NHB was 4.6-5.5 patients per 1000 newborns. This high-risk hemolytic NHB imposed substantial burdens of healthcare resource utilization and incremental costs on newborns, their caregivers, and the healthcare system.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/economia , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Transfusão Total/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/terapia , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Recém-Nascido , Cobertura do Seguro , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Fototerapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 838, 2018 Nov 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30404646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To benefit from the increasing clinical evidence, organisational changes have been among the main drivers behind the reduction of ICU mortality during the last decade. Increasing demand, costs and complexity, amplifies the need for optimisation of clinical processes and resource utilisation. Thus, multidisciplinary teamwork and critical care processes needs to be adapted to profit from increased availability of human skill and technical resources in a cost-effective manner. Inadequate clinical performance and outcome data compelled us to design a quality improvement project to address current work processes and competence utilisation. METHODS: During revision period, clinical processes, professional performance and clinical competence were targeted using "scientific production management methodology" approach. As part of the project, an intensivist training program was instituted, and full time intensivist coverage was obtained in the process of creating multi-professional teams, composed of certified intensivists, critical care nurses, assistant nurses, physiotherapists and social counsellors. The use of staff resources and clinical work-processes were optimised in accordance with the outcome of a "value stream mapping". In this process, efforts to enhance the personal dynamics and performance within the teams were paramount. Clinical and economic outcome data were analysed during a seven year follow up period. RESULTS: • Consecutive reduced overall ICU (24%) and long-term (600 days) mortality. The effect on ICU mortality was especially pronounced in the subgroup of patients > 65 years (30%) • Consecutive reduced length of stay (43%, septic patients) and time on ventilator (for septic patients and patients > 65 years of age (23 resp.52%). • Substantial increase in life years gained (13,140 life years) as well as quality-adjusted life-years (9593 QALY: s) over the study period. • High cost-effectiveness as ICU costs were  reduced while patient outcomes were improved. Disregarding the cost reduction in ICU, the intervention is highly cost effective with cost- effectiveness ratios of (75€/QALY) and (55€ / life year) CONCLUSIONS: We have shown favourable results of a QI project aiming to improve the clinical performance and quality through the development of multi-professional interaction, teamwork and systematic revisions of work processes. The economic evaluation shows that the intervention is highly cost-effective and potentially dominating.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suécia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 14(2): 126-133, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29977469

RESUMO

Intensive care unit telemedicine (tele-ICU) is technology enabled care delivered from off-site locations that was developed to address the increasing complexity of patients and insufficient supply of intensivists. Although tele-ICU deployment is increasing, it continues to cover only a small proportion of ICU patients. This is primarily due to expense, with first-year costs exceeding $50,000 per bed. Meta-analyses of outcomes indicate survival benefits and quality improvements, albeit with significant heterogeneity. Depending on the context, a wide range of estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios reflects variable effects on cost and outcomes, such as mortality or length of stay. Tele-ICUs may fit within a hybrid model of care to complement high-intensity ICU staff coverage. However, more research is required to foster consensus and determine best practices. This review summarizes data on tele-ICU structure, operations, outcomes, and costs. Evidence was extracted from meta-analyses, with secondary data from Cleveland Clinic's tele-ICU experience.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/métodos , Fluxo de Trabalho
7.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 14(2): 134-140, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29977470

RESUMO

Over the past few decades, an increasing number of studies have shown that intensivist-staffed intensive care units (ICUs) lead to overall economic benefits and improved patient outcomes, including shorter length of stay and lower rates of complications and mortality. This body of evidence has convinced advocacy groups to adopt this staffing model as a standard of care in the ICU so that more hospitals are offering around-the-clock intensivist coverage. Even so, opponents have pointed to high ICU staffing costs and a shortage of physicians trained in critical care as barriers to implementing this model. While these arguments may hold true in low-acuity, low-volume ICUs, evidence has shown that in high-acuity, high-volume centers such as teaching hospitals and tertiary care centers, the benefits outweigh the costs. This article explores the history of intensivists and critical care, the arguments for 24/7 ICU staffing, and outcomes in various ICU settings but is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all controversies surrounding continuous ICU staffing.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Descrição de Cargo , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/economia , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Avaliação das Necessidades , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/economia , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Fluxo de Trabalho , Recursos Humanos
8.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 19(5): 412-420, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29406371

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe program design, costs, and savings implications of a critical care-based care coordination model for medically complex children with chronic respiratory failure. DESIGN: All program activities and resultant clinical outcomes were tracked over 4 years using an adapted version of the Care Coordination Measurement Tool. Patient characteristics, program activity, and acute care resource utilization were prospectively documented in the adapted version of the Care Coordination Measurement Tool and retrospectively cross-validated with hospital billing data. Impact on total costs of care was then estimated based on program outcomes and nationally representative administrative data. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital. SUBJECTS: Critical Care, Anesthesia, Perioperative Extension and Home Ventilation Program enrollees. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The program provided care for 346 patients and families over the study period. Median age at enrollment was 6 years with more than half deriving secondary respiratory failure from a primary neuromuscular disease. There were 11,960 encounters over the study period, including 1,202 home visits, 673 clinic visits, and 4,970 telephone or telemedicine encounters. Half (n = 5,853) of all encounters involved a physician and 45% included at least one care coordination activity. Overall, we estimated that program interventions were responsible for averting 556 emergency department visits and 107 hospitalizations. Conservative monetization of these alone accounted for annual savings of $1.2-2 million or $407/pt/mo net of program costs. CONCLUSIONS: Innovative models, such as extension of critical care services, for high-risk, high-cost patients can result in immediate cost savings. Evaluation of financial implications of comprehensive care for high-risk patients is necessary to complement clinical and patient-centered outcomes for alternative care models. When year-to-year cost variability is high and cost persistence is low, these savings can be estimated from documentation within care coordination management tools. Means of financial sustainability, scalability, and equal access of such care models need to be established.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Pediatria/economia , Insuficiência Respiratória/economia , Especialização/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Massachusetts , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Pediatria/organização & administração , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Popul Health Manag ; 20(6): 435-441, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28338416

RESUMO

Adolescents and young adults with special care and health needs in the United States-many of whom have Medicaid coverage-at the transition phase between pediatric and adult care often experience critical care gaps. To address this challenge, a new model-referred to as Comprehensive Care Clinic (CCC)-has been developed and implemented by Geisinger Health System since 2012. CCC comprises a care team, consisting of a generalist physician, advanced practitioner, pharmacist, and a nurse case manager, that develops and closely follows a coordinated care plan. This study examines the CCC impact on total cost of care and utilization by analyzing Geisinger Health Plan claims data obtained from 83 Medicaid patients enrolled in CCC. A set of multivariate regression models with patient fixed effects was estimated to obtain adjusted differences in cost and acute care utilization between the months in which the patients were enrolled and the months not enrolled in CCC. The results indicate that CCC enrollment was associated with a 28% reduction in per-member-per-month total cost ($3931 observed vs. $5451 expected; P = 0.028), driven by reductions in hospitalization and emergency department visits. This finding suggests a clinical redesign focused on adolescent and young adults with complex care needs can potentially reduce total cost and acute care utilization among such patients.


Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Transtorno Autístico/economia , Transtorno Autístico/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid , Disrafismo Espinal/economia , Disrafismo Espinal/terapia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Schmerz ; 29(3): 266-75, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25994606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Due to the implementation of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, the competitive pressure on German hospitals increased. In this context it has been shown that acute pain management offers economic benefits for hospitals. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the competitive situation, the ownership and the economic resources required on structures and processes for acute pain management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A standardized questionnaire on structures and processes of acute pain management was mailed to the 885 directors of German departments of anesthesiology listed as members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin). RESULTS: For most hospitals a strong regional competition existed; however, this parameter affected neither the implementation of structures nor the recommended treatment processes for pain therapy. In contrast, a clear preference for hospitals in private ownership to use the benchmarking tool QUIPS (quality improvement in postoperative pain therapy) was found. These hospitals also presented information on coping with the management of pain in the corporate clinic mission statement more often and published information about the quality of acute pain management in the quality reports more frequently. No differences were found between hospitals with different forms of ownership in the implementation of acute pain services, quality circles, expert standard pain management and the implementation of recommended processes. Hospitals with a higher case mix index (CMI) had a certified acute pain management more often. The corporate mission statement of these hospitals also contained information on how to cope with pain, presentation of the quality of pain management in the quality report, implementation of quality circles and the implementation of the expert standard pain management more frequently. There were no differences in the frequency of using the benchmarking tool QUIPS or the implementation of recommended treatment processes with respect to the CMI. CONCLUSION: In this survey no effect of the competitive situation of hospitals on acute pain management could be demonstrated. Private ownership and a higher CMI were more often associated with structures of acute pain management which were publicly accessible in terms of hospital marketing.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda/economia , Dor Aguda/terapia , Competição Econômica/economia , Economia Hospitalar , Propriedade/economia , Manejo da Dor/economia , Anestesiologia/economia , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Alemanha , Humanos , Seguradoras/economia , Participação nas Decisões/economia , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Risco Ajustado/economia
11.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 41(3): 386-91, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25554680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Malignancies of the peritoneum remain a challenge in any hospital that accepts to manage them, due not only to difficulties associated with the complexity of the procedures involved but also the costs, which - in Italy and other countries that use a diagnosis-related group (DRG) system - are not adequately reimbursed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed data relative to 24 patients operated on between September 2010 and May 2013 with special regard to operating room expenditure, ICU stay, duration of hospitalization, and DRG reimbursement. The total costs per patient included clinical, operating room, procedure, pathology, imaging, ward care, allied healthcare, pharmaceutical, and ICU costs. RESULTS: Postoperative hospital stay, drugs and materials, and operating room occupancy were the main factors affecting the expenditure for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We had a median hospitalization of 14 days, median ICU stay of 2.4 days, and median operating room occupancy of 585 min. The median expenditure for each case was € 21,744; the median reimbursement by the national health system € 8,375. CONCLUSIONS: In a DRG reimbursement system, the economic effort in the management of patients undergoing peritonectomy procedures may not be counterbalanced by adequate reimbursement. Joint efforts between medical and administration parties are mandatory to develop appropriate treatment protocols and keep down the costs.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Carcinoma/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hipertermia Induzida/economia , Mesotelioma/economia , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/economia , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/secundário , Carcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/economia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Infusões Parenterais/economia , Itália , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Mesotelioma/secundário , Mesotelioma/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Peritônio/cirurgia , Pseudomixoma Peritoneal/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia
12.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 69(5): 546-51, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25469466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Intravenous (i.v.) glutamine supplementation of parenteral nutrition (PN) can improve clinical outcomes, reduce mortality and infection rates and shorten the length of hospital and/or intensive care unit (ICU) stays compared with standard PN. This study is a pharmacoeconomic analysis to determine whether i.v. glutamine supplementation of PN remains both a highly favourable and cost-effective option for Italian ICU patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A previously published discrete event simulation model was updated by incorporating the most up-to-date and clinically relevant efficacy data (a clinically realistic subgroup analysis from a published meta-analysis), recent cost data from the Italian health-care system and the latest epidemiology data from a large Italian ICU database (covering 230 Italian ICUs and more than 77,000 patients). Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Parenteral glutamine supplementation can significantly improve ICU efficiency in Italy, as the additional cost of supplemented treatment is more than completely offset by cost savings in hospital care. Supplementation was more cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio (CER)=[euro ]35,165 per patient discharged alive) than standard, non-supplemented PN (CER=[euro ]40,156 per patient discharged alive), and it resulted in mean cost savings of [euro ]4991 per patient discharged alive or [euro ]1047 per patient admitted to the hospital. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Alanyl-glutamine supplementation of PN is a clinically and economically attractive strategy for ICU patients in Italy and may be applicable to selected ICU patient populations in other countries.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Suplementos Nutricionais/economia , Glutamina/administração & dosagem , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Glutamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infecções/dietoterapia , Infecções/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Itália/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos
13.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 80(3): 348-56, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26280608

RESUMO

This study describes current clinical practice and outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Belgian hospitals. Orthopaedic registries concentrate on implant related analyses and sometimes on patient reported outcomes. Our aim was to describe the extent and to generate hypotheses about the determinants of the variability of health care practices and of prosthesis survival in Belgium. Only unilateral elective primary Total Hip Arthroplasties were included. Length of stay, costs, transfusion rates and other care activities were analysed over 2008 and 2009 together. Prosthesis survival was studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression hazard ratio computations over the period 2000-2009. 36798 elective Total Hip Arthroplasties have been included in a study of all members of the Belgian Christian Sickness Fund. The non-standardised ten year Total Hip Arthroplasty survival rate is 93% (Kaplan-Meier). Quality has progressed notably compared with 10 years earlier. Important variations still persist though between hospitals, for all studied indicators.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Prótese de Quadril , Seguro Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Bélgica , Benchmarking , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Seguradoras , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Falha de Prótese , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 67(12): 1243-50, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169464

RESUMO

Malnutrition is a costly problem for health care systems internationally. Malnourished individuals require longer hospital stays and more intensive nursing care than adequately nourished individuals and have been estimated to cost an additional £7.3 billion in health care expenditures in the United Kingdom alone. However, treatments for malnutrition have rarely been considered from an economic perspective. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the cost effectiveness of using protein and energy supplementation as a widely used intervention to treat adults with and at risk of malnutrition. Papers were identified that included economic evaluations of protein or energy supplementation for the treatment or prevention of malnutrition in adults. While the variety of outcome measures reported for cost-effectiveness studies made synthesis of results challenging, cost-benefit studies indicated that the savings for the health system could be substantial due to reduced lengths of hospital stay and less intensive use of health services after discharge. In summary, the available economic evidence indicates that protein and energy supplementation in treatment or prevention of malnutrition provides an opportunity to improve patient wellbeing and lower health system costs.


Assuntos
Proteínas Alimentares/administração & dosagem , Suplementos Nutricionais/economia , Ingestão de Energia , Desnutrição/economia , Desnutrição/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Desnutrição/terapia , Reino Unido
15.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 67(8): 802-7, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23801093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Invasive procedures such as surgery cause immunosuppression, leading to increased risk of complications, infections and extended hospital stay. Emerging research around immune-enhancing nutrition supplements and their ability to reduce postoperative complications and reduce treatment costs is promising. This randomised controlled trial aims to examine the effect of preoperative immunonutrition supplementation on length of hospital stay (LOS), complications and treatment costs in both well-nourished and malnourished gastrointestinal surgery patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Ninety-five patients undergoing elective upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery were recruited. The treatment group (n=46) received a commercial immuno-enhancing supplement 5 days preoperatively. The control group (n=49) received no supplements. The primary outcome measure was LOS, and secondary outcome measures included complications and cost. RESULTS: A nonsignificant trend towards a shorter LOS within the treatment group was observed (7.1 ± 4.1 compared with 8.8 ± 6.5 days; P=0.11). For malnourished patients, this trend was greater with hospital stay reduced by 4 days (8.3 ± 3.5 vs 12.3 ± 9.5 days; P=0.21). Complications and unplanned intensive care admission rates were very low in both the groups. The average admission cost was reduced by AUD1576 in the treatment group compared with the control group (P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative immunonutrition therapy in gastrointestinal surgery has the potential to reduce the LOS and cost, with greater treatment benefit seen in malnourished patients; however, there is a need for additional research with greater patient numbers.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Alimentos Formulados , Trato Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Tempo de Internação , Desnutrição/imunologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Desnutrição/complicações , Desnutrição/dietoterapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/imunologia , Prevalência , Valores de Referência
17.
J Health Econ ; 32(1): 88-105, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23202257

RESUMO

Explanations of growth in health expenditures have restricted attention to the mean. We explain change throughout the distribution of expenditures, providing insight into how expenditure growth and its explanation differ along the distribution. We analyse Dutch data on actual health expenditures linked to hospital discharge and mortality registers. Full distribution decomposition delivers findings that would be overlooked by examination of changes in the mean alone. The growth rate of hospital expenditures is greatest at the middle of the distribution and is driven mainly by changes in the distributions of determinants. Pharmaceutical expenditures increase most rapidly at the top of the distribution and are mainly attributable to structural changes, including technological progress, making treatment of the highest cost cases even more expensive. Changes in hospital practice styles make the largest contribution of all determinants to increased spending not only on hospital care but also on pharmaceuticals, suggesting important spill over effects.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Tecnologia Biomédica/economia , Tecnologia Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Economia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Países Baixos
18.
Health Technol Assess ; 10(29): iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-133, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16904048

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managing critically ill patients in adult, general intensive care with or without pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). DESIGN: An open, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation (cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis). SETTING: The setting was general (mixed medical/surgical) intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK admitting adults. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients in participating ICUs deemed by the responsible treating clinician to require management with a PAC. INTERVENTIONS: These were insertion of a PAC and subsequent clinical management, at the discretion of the responsible treating clinicians, using data derived from the PAC. The control group were managed without a PAC but with the option of using alternative cardiac output monitoring devices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay in the ICU, length of stay in an acute hospital and organ-days of support in the ICU. For the economic evaluation, the main outcome measure was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the secondary outcome measure was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-five ICUs in the UK participated. Of these, 43 (66%) used alternative cardiac output monitoring devices in control group patients. A total of 1263 patients were identified as being eligible for the trial. Of these, 1041 (82.4%) were randomised and allocated to management with (n = 519) or without (n = 522) a PAC. There were no losses to follow-up. However, 27 patients (13 in the PAC group and 14 in the control group) were withdrawn from the trial because either the patient withdrew consent on recovering mental competency or the relatives withdrew agreement following randomisation. Data on 1014 patients were included in the analysis. Participants in the two groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was no difference in hospital mortality for patients managed with (68.4%) or without (65.7%) a PAC. The adjusted hazard ratio (PAC versus no PAC) was 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.27]. There was no difference in the median length of stay in ICU, the median length of stay in an acute hospital or mean organ-days of support in ICU between the two groups. The economic evaluation found that the expected cost per QALY gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 2985 pounds. The expected cost per life gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 22,038 pounds. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical management of critically ill patients with a PAC, as currently practised in the UK, neither improves hospital survival for adult, general intensive care patients nor reduces length of stay in hospital. The lack of demonstrable benefit from a device previously believed to be beneficial could be explained by statistical chance, by misinterpretation of PAC-derived data, by ineffective treatment strategies based on data correctly interpreted using the current paradigm or by subsequent inaction following insertion of the device. It is also possible that detailed data on haemodynamics, however used, cannot modify the disease process sufficiently to influence disease outcome. The economic evaluation, using decision analysis techniques rather than conventional hypothesis testing, suggests that the withdrawal of the PAC from routine clinical practice in the NHS would be considered cost-effective in the current decision-making climate, and might result in lives or life-years being saved at modest cost. With the declining use of PACs in the UK and the findings of this report indicating no overall benefit from management with a PAC, it should now be possible to examine protocolised management with a PAC in selected groups of critically ill patients against appropriate controls, something that was difficult while PACs were the considered standard of care.


Assuntos
Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/instrumentação , Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 26(6): 575-9, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16018434

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Timely initiation of antibiotic therapy is crucial for severe infection. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is often delayed for nosocomial infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The relationship between knowledge of colonization caused by antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria (ABR-GNB) and rate of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy for subsequent bacteremia was evaluated. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Fifty-four-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. In this unit, colonization surveillance is performed through routine site-specific surveillance cultures (urine, mouth, trachea, and anus). Additional cultures are performed when presumed clinically relevant. PATIENTS: ICU patients with nosocomial bacteremia caused by ABR-GNB. RESULTS: Infectious and microbiological characteristics and rates of appropriate antibiotic therapy were compared between patients with and without colonization prior to bacteremia. Prior colonization was defined as the presence (detected > or = 2 days before the onset of bacteremia) of the same ABR-GNB in colonization and subsequent blood cultures. During the study period, 157 episodes of bacteremia caused by ABR-GNB were suitable for evaluation. One hundred seventeen episodes of bacteremia (74.5%) were preceded by colonization. Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (started within 24 hours) was administered for 74.4% of these episodes versus 55.0% of the episodes that occurred without prior colonization. Appropriate therapy was administered within 48 hours for all episodes preceded by colonization versus 90.0% of episodes without prior colonization. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of colonization status prior to infection is associated with higher rates of appropriate therapy for patients with bacteremia caused by ABR-GNB.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Seleção de Pacientes , Canal Anal/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/economia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Boca/microbiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Traqueia/microbiologia , Urina/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA