Comparison of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness and transverse microradiography for the study of early caries lesion formation in human and bovine enamel.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the present laboratory study were twofold: a) to investigate the suitability of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness (SMH) in comparison to transverse microradiography (TMR) to investigate early enamel caries lesion formation; b) to compare the kinetics of caries lesion initiation and progression between human and bovine enamel. DESIGN: Specimens (90×bovine and 90×human enamel) were divided into six groups (demineralization times of 8/16/24/32/40/48h) of 15 per enamel type and demineralized using a partially saturated lactic acid solution. SMH was measured before and after demineralization and changes in indentation length (ΔIL) calculated. Lesions were characterized using TMR. Data were analyzed (two-way ANOVA) and Pearson correlation coefficients calculated. RESULTS: ΔIL increased with increasing demineralization times but plateaued after 40h, whereas lesion depth (L) and integrated mineral loss (ΔZ) increased almost linearly throughout. No differences between Knoop and Vickers SMH in their ability to measure enamel demineralization were observed as both correlated strongly. Overall, ΔIL correlated strongly with ΔZ and L but only moderately with the degree of surface zone mineralization, whereas ΔZ and L correlated strongly. Bovine demineralized faster than human enamel (all techniques). CONCLUSIONS: Lesions in bovine formed faster than in human enamel, although the resulting lesions were almost indistinguishable in their mineral distribution characteristics. Early caries lesion demineralization can be sufficiently studied by SMH, but its limitations on the assessment of the mineral status of more demineralized lesions must be considered. Ideally, complementary techniques to assess changes in both physical and chemical lesion characteristics would be employed.

Detection of artificial demineralization bordering different types of laminate veneers using visual inspection and storage phosphor radiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection (VI) and storage phosphor plate (SPP) radiography for the detection of artificial demineralization bordering different laminate veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty human maxillary canine teeth were prepared. All-ceramic (A) and hybrid ceramic (H) laminate veneers were fabricated and luted. Veneered teeth were covered except for a circular window on the proximal surface bordering restorations. Teeth were kept in acetic acid buffer to create demineralization and imaged with a SPP system. Ten observers evaluated all teeth first visually then with SPP images for the presence/absence of demineralization. Teeth were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as well. The accuracy was expressed as the area under the ROC curves (A(z)). Pair-wise comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc t test (p = 0.05). Fleiss kappa (κ) was used for agreement. RESULTS: SPP radiography was better than the VI for both veneers (p = 0.004). The A(z)s of two veneers were different for both VI (p < 0.005) and SPP (p < 0.005). SEM evaluation revealed lesions confined to enamel. κ was fair for H, and fair to moderate for A. Agreement was higher for the radiographic evaluation for both veneers. CONCLUSION: Enamel demineralizations bordering hybrid and ceramic laminate veneers can be detected better with SPP radiography than VI and detectability was better for all-ceramic veneers than the hybrid ceramic ones. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Early detection of enamel demineralizations bordering laminate veneers would result in time-saving and less-invasive treatment methods; therefore, SPP radiography may be recommended in clinically suspicious cases since it provides better diagnostic accuracy.

Effect of various Ca2+/PO4(3-) concentrations of linseed-based saliva substitutes on enamel in vitro.

Remineralization might be hampered by various polymers used in saliva substitutes. Thus, the present study evaluated the effects of various calcium and phosphate concentrations of linseed-based solutions on the mineral loss of pre-demineralized bovine enamel in vitro. A commercially available saliva substitute (Salinum) based on linseed was tested as well. Enamel specimens were prepared from bovine incisors and embedded in epoxy resin. One-third of each sample was covered with nail varnish (control of sound enamel). After demineralization (37 degrees Celsius; pH 5.0; 14 days) another third of the samples was nail-varnished again. Subsequently, the specimens (n = 10) were exposed to 12 linseed-based solutions (Ca(2+) addition 0-2 mM; PO4(3-) addition 0-3.2 mM) at pH 5.5 and 6.5 as well as to Salinum) for 14 days (37 degrees Celsius). The differences in mineral loss between the values prior to and after the storage in the various solutions were evaluated from microradiographs of thin sections (100 mum). The general linear model revealed a significant dependency for the mineral loss on 'calcium' (P = 0.003), but not on 'pH' (P = 0.397) and 'phosphate' (P = 0.094). Salinum) induced a significant greater mineral loss compared with equivalently saturated solutions (P < 0.05; anova, Bonferroni). The solution with the highest calcium and phosphate concentration showed the greatest mineral gain (P = 0.033; paired t-test). The addition of calcium and phosphate seems to have a positive effect on the remineralizing qualities of linseed-based saliva substitutes.

Comparison of calcium/phosphorus analysis, longitudinal microradiography and profilometry for the quantitative assessment of erosive demineralisation.

The study is a comparison of methods for the quantitative measurement of erosive mineral loss including longitudinal microradiography (LMR), profilometry (PM), and analysis of calcium (CA) and phosphorus (PA) in the erosion solution. Polished human enamel samples were taped, covered with nail varnish and the edges of the resulting enamel window marked with drilled holes as a reference. All samples were subjected to baseline LMR. Sixty samples each were eroded with citric acid (0.05 M; pH 2.3; 10 ml per sample) for 30, 60, 90, or 120 min. Erosive loss of each sample was estimated by the four methods. All methods revealed a linear erosive loss over time and showed good linear correlation. Values calculated from PM and LMR were both approximately 20% lower than those from CA and PA. After 30 min erosion, LMR showed no significant correlation with the other three methods. With LMR, erosive loss below 20 microm should be interpreted with care.

Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro.

This investigation sought to evaluate the effects of air-rotor stripping on the susceptibility of human enamel to demineralization using an in vitro caries model. Crowns of extracted premolar teeth were abraded (0.5 mm) on one proximal surface by air-rotor stripping. The teeth were placed in a demineralizing gel and removed at various intervals up to 336 hours. Lesion depth and mineral content on the abraded and intact surfaces was measured with contact microradiography and computerized image analysis (double window technique). For each time interval measured, lesion depth was greater (p < 0.05) on the abraded surfaces and mineral density was significantly less (p < 0.05). In a second experiment, the effect of fluoride supplements (dentifrice or topical gel) were examined on abraded and intact enamel surfaces that were exposed to the acid gel for 192 hours. The data showed that fluoride treatments significantly reduced lesion penetration on intact and abraded surfaces compared with a no fluoride group. Lesion depth on the abraded, fluoride treated surfaces was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than on the intact untreated surfaces. No significant differences (p < 0.05) were apparent between the fluoride treatment groups with respect to lesion depth and mineral density within the lesion. These results suggest that air-rotor stripping significantly increases the susceptibility of proximal enamel surfaces to demineralization. As a result, the clinician should use caution in the application of this technique until the long-term effects on caries susceptibility have been determined.