Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(4): 1123-1128, 2017 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27999047

RESUMO

Background: Arbekacin is an aminoglycoside that shows strong antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa . The therapeutic effectiveness of arbekacin is directly related to C max at the infection site. To maximize drug delivery to the respiratory tract and minimize the systemic toxicity, arbekacin optimized for inhalation, ME1100, is under development. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ME1100 in a murine model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa by using a customized investigational nebulizer system. Methods: The mice were treated for 5 min, once daily, with placebo, 3, 10 or 30 mg/mL ME1100 or 30 mg/mL amikacin. Results: In the survival study, the survival rate was significantly improved in the 10 and 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment groups compared with that in the placebo group. The number of bacteria in the lungs was significantly lower in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group at 6 h after the initial treatment, compared with all other groups. In the pharmacokinetic study, the C max in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and plasma was 31.1 and 1.2 mg/L, respectively. Furthermore, we compared the efficacy of ME1100 with that of amikacin. Although there were no significant differences in ELF and plasma concentrations between 30 mg/mL of ME1100 and 30 mg/mL of amikacin, ME1100 significantly improved the survival rate compared with amikacin. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrated the in vivo effectiveness of ME1100 and its superiority to amikacin.


Assuntos
Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Dibecacina/análogos & derivados , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Amicacina/administração & dosagem , Amicacina/farmacocinética , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Dibecacina/administração & dosagem , Dibecacina/química , Dibecacina/farmacocinética , Dibecacina/uso terapêutico , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Composição de Medicamentos , Pulmão/microbiologia , Camundongos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 50(11): 3763-9, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17065622

RESUMO

Arbekacin is widely used in Japan for the treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In this study, we have determined the optimal concentration targets of arbekacin for both efficacy and safety. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed to relate exposure to the drug and clinical cure/improvement or nephrotoxicity. Since we have reported the population pharmacokinetic parameters for arbekacin in the preceding paper (Y. Tanigawara, R. Sato, K. Morita, M. Kaku, N. Aikawa, and K. Shimizu, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3754-3762, 2006), individual exposure parameters, such as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), peak concentration (C(max)), AUC/MIC, C(max)/MIC, and trough concentration (C(min)) were estimated by the Bayesian method. Logistic regression was used to describe the relationship between exposure to the drug and the probability of clinical cure/improvement or nephrotoxicity. For the clinical efficacy analysis, 174 patients confirmed to have an MRSA infection were evaluated. The C(max), C(min), and AUC of arbekacin were associated with the probability of clinical cure/improvement during monotherapy. It was shown that the probability of cure/improvement rose when the C(max) of arbekacin was increased, with an odds ratio of 6.7 for a change in C(max) from 7.9 to 12.5 microg/ml (P = 0.037). For the nephrotoxic risk analysis, 333 patients were included, regardless of whether a pathogen was identified. Logistic regression analysis revealed C(min) and AUC as risk factors of nephrotoxicity (P < 0.005). The estimated probabilities of arbekacin-induced nephrotoxicity were 2.5, 5.2, and 13.1% when the C(min) values were 1, 2, and 5 microg/ml, respectively. The present findings are useful for optimizing the individual dose of arbekacin for the treatment of MRSA-infected patients.


Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos/farmacocinética , Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Dibecacina/análogos & derivados , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aminoglicosídeos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Área Sob a Curva , Criança , Dibecacina/efeitos adversos , Dibecacina/farmacocinética , Dibecacina/uso terapêutico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Nefropatias/induzido quimicamente , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Testes de Função Renal , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
Clin Ther ; 16(6): 1016-27, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7697681

RESUMO

To assess the possibility of bacterial colonization of fibrin glue and the effects of adding local sustained-release antibiotics, we conducted in vivo and in vitro preliminary studies. The in vitro experiments revealed that, although there was no colonization of the fibrin glue plates by the eight strains of bacteria tested, the fibrin mesh can serve as a culture medium when blood mingles with it, as is the case in clinical use. Adding dibekacin sulfate (DKB; 3570 micrograms/mL) to fibrin glue decreased the likelihood of colonization of the fibrin mesh. The pharmacokinetics of the added DKB were investigated by adding DKB-supplemented fibrin glue directly to muscle and vascular tissue in male rats. The DKB rapidly eluded from the fibrin glue (less than 0.2% remained after 24 hours). Because the amount remaining after 7 days (2.03 micrograms/mL) was greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration for most clinical pathogens, a 7-day preventive effect against colonization of the fibrin glue and the surrounding tissue can be anticipated at the concentration used in the present experiments. Experiments using the dermis layer of porcine skin strips showed that the added DKB did not affect the adhesive strength of the fibrin glue.


Assuntos
Aderência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Dibecacina/uso terapêutico , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina , Animais , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Dibecacina/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Músculo Liso Vascular/metabolismo , Músculos/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Wistar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA