Parenchymal asbestosis due to primary asbestos exposure among ship-breaking workers: report of the first cases from Bangladesh.

We report for the first time asbestosis among ship-breaking workers of Sitakunda in Bangladesh who were exposed to asbestos during ship-based and beach-based operations for at least 10 years. Asbestosis was present among 35% of workers. Years of work (>20) and forced vital capacity (<80% of predicted) were significantly associated with the disease. Currently, global ship-breaking operations are mainly concentrated in the Indian subcontinent, and Bangladesh has the majority share. Ninety per cent of domestic steel is produced in the ship-breaking operations in Bangladesh and is an important contributor to the economy. It also gives employment to more than 100 000 people. It is imperative to medically check up all the workers for benign and malignant diseases causally related to asbestos among these vulnerable population of workers.

Ultrasound-guided pneumothorax induction prior to local anaesthetic thoracoscopy.

Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT) is performed by a growing number of respiratory physicians in the context of an expanding population with pleural disease. Most LATs occur in patients with moderate to large effusions where the presence of fluid allows safe access to the pleural space. Patients with little or no fluid, but other features concerning for pleural disease, are usually investigated by surgical means. Advanced LAT practitioners can also provide this service through pneumothorax induction, although there is little published data on the safety or efficacy of this technique. We present data from a series of 77 consecutive patients in whom ultrasound-guided pneumothorax induction and LAT were attempted. 67 procedures (87.0%) were successful, with the most common histopathological diagnoses being chronic pleuritis (58.2%) and mesothelioma (16.4%). No adverse events were reported secondary to the procedure. These findings demonstrate the utility of this approach and should inform future practice and guidelines.

[Overdiagnosis and defensive medicine in occupational medicine]. / Overdiagnosis e medicina difensiva in Medicina del Lavoro.

In clinical medicine since some years overdiagnosis is giving rise to growing attention and concern. Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of a "disease" that will never cause symptoms or death during a patient's lifetime. It is a side effect of testing for early forms of disease which may turn people into patients unnecessarily and may lead to treatments that do no good and perhaps do harm. Overdiagnosis occurs when a disease is diagnosed correctly, but the diagnosis is irrelevant. A correct diagnosis may be irrelevant because treatment for the disease is not available, not needed, or not wanted. Four drivers engender overdiagnosis: 1) screening in non symptomatic subjects; 2) raised sensitivity of diagnostic tests; 3) incidental overdiagnosis; 4) broadening of diagnostic criteria for diseases. "Defensive medicine" can play a role. It begs the question of whether even in the context of Occupational Medicine overdiagnosis is possible. In relation to the double diagnostic evaluation peculiar to Occupational Medicine, the clinical and the causal, a dual phenomenon is possible: that of overdiagnosis properly said and what we could define the overattribution, in relation to the assessment of a causal relationship with work. Examples of occupational "diseases" that can represent cases of overdiagnosis, with the possible consequences of overtreatment, consisting of unnecessary and socially harmful limitations to fitness for work, are taken into consideration: pleural plaques, alterations of the intervertebral discs, "small airways disease", sub-clinical hearing impairment. In Italy the National Insurance for occupational diseases (INAIL) regularly recognizes less than 50% of the notified diseases; this might suggest overdiagnosis and possibly overattribution in reporting. Physicians dealing with the diagnosis of occupational diseases are obviously requested to perform a careful, up-to-date and active investigation. When applying to the diagnosis of occupational diseases, proper logical criteria should be even antecedent to a good diagnostic technique, due to social outcome for the worker.

Rigid versus semi-rigid thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of pleural disease: a randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Thoracoscopy with a semi-rigid instrument is a recent technique successfully used for diagnosing pleural diseases. However, there are concerns about the diagnostic adequacy of biopsy samples obtained by semi-rigid procedures when compared with rigid thoracoscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare the size, quality and diagnostic adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained at semi-rigid and rigid thoracoscopy in a prospective, randomized fashion. METHODS: Patients with pleural effusion of unknown origin and/or pleural irregularities suspicious for pleural malignancy were included after less invasive means of diagnosis had failed. All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia with intravenous sedation/analgesia with a single point of entry. Patients were randomly assigned to a rigid instrument procedure (Olympus EndoEYE WA50120A, forceps) or semi-rigid instrument procedure (Olympus LTF-160, FB-55CR-1 forceps). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were randomized. Five of them were excluded because of lack of pleural space. Thirty-eight patients were assigned to a rigid and 41 to a semi-rigid procedure, with mean follow up 24.1 (±8.1) months after the procedure. The average size of the sample obtained by rigid thoracoscopy was 24.7 mm(2) (±12.9), and 11.7 mm(2) (±7.6) by semi-rigid thoracoscopy. There were no differences in the quality and interpretability of the specimens assessed by the pathologist. The diagnostic accuracy was 100% for the rigid procedure and 97.6% for the semi-rigid procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The samples obtained by semi-rigid thoracoscopy were smaller, but of adequate quality. The diagnostic accuracy was comparable with that of rigid thoracoscopy in the evaluation of pleural disease.

[Clinical utility of thoracoscopy under local anesthesia].

Thoracoscopy has been recently established as an indispensable technique for diagnosis and treatment of respiratory diseases. Although, thoracoscopy is usually applied under general anesthesia by a surgeon, it can also be applied by a chest physician under local anesthesia if the target is limited to pleural diseases. The main objective of medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia is to establish a diagnosis of pleural effusions by means of observation and biopsy in the thoracic cavity. Our main target diseases are the pleuritis carcinomatosa, malignant mesothelioma and tuberculous pleuritis. These 3 diseases are the diseases with which medical thoracoscopy is most useful because they can be reliably diagnosed by biopsies and because early diagnosis and early treatment are essential. In case of the pneumothorax, treatment with bulla looping or cauterization may be possible, but we do not treat pneumothorax with medical thoracoscopy because it is impossible to approach and find air leaks of lesions located in or near blind spots such as the apex or mediastinal part In case of acute emphysema, it is important to release adhesions and perform effective drainage using thoracoscopy as soon as possible since deposition of fibrin tends to form quickly compartments that make drainage difficult. Scince medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia is rapid, easy, safe, and well-tolerated procedure with an excellent diagnostic yield, it is recommended as a diagnostic procedure for cases with pleural diseases.

Diagnostic value of thoracoscopic pleural biopsy for pleurisy under local anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: We find pleural effusion in clinical practice frequently. However, it is difficult to make a diagnosis definitively by thoracocentesis or closed pleural biopsy. We directly examine the thoracic cavity by thoracoscopy under local anaesthesia, carry out pleural biopsy and make a definitive pathological diagnosis in pleurisy. METHOD: A retrospective study of 138 patients who had been diagnosed by thoracoscopy in our hospital was carried out between January 1995 and January 2005. RESULTS: The patients were 114 men and 24 women, ranging in age from 21 to 85 years, with a mean of 59 years. The right side was involved in 83 patients and the left side in 55. The operations took 11-145 min, with a mean of 46 min. Thoracoscopy directly without thoracocenteses was carried out in 28 of 138 patients. Lung cancer with pleural dissemination was diagnosed in 27, malignant pleural mesothelioma in 10, tuberculous pleurisy in 32, non-specific pleurisy in 58, other tumour in 2 and pyothorax in 9 patients. The overall diagnostic efficacy was 97.1% (134/138). The diagnostic efficacy in the cases of carcinoma was 92.6% (25/27), in malignant pleural mesothelioma it was 100% (10/10) and in tuberculosis it was 93.8% (30/32). No major complications occurred during the examination. CONCLUSION: Pleural biopsy by thoracoscopy under local anaesthesia should be actively carried out in patients with pleurisy, because the technique has a high diagnostic rate and can be easily and safely carried out.

Four-step local anesthesia and sedation for thoracoscopic diagnosis and management of pleural diseases.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Most thoracic surgeons perform thoracoscopy under general anesthesia using a double-lumen endotracheal tube. We describe our own technique for performing thoracoscopy under local anesthesia and sedation. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Forty-five patients underwent the procedure under local anesthesia and sedation (mean age, 64 years; age range, 40 to 92 years). A known history of cancer was present in 12 patients. American Society of Anesthesiology score was I in 1 patient, II in 16 patients, III in 22 patients, IV in 5 patients, and V in 1 patient. Premedication was comprised of droperidol, 5 mg, and atropine, 0.5 mg, administered 20 min before the scheduled operating room time. Sedation was maintained by diazepam injection, 3 mg. Four-step local anesthesia in the planned intercostal space using 10 mL of ropivacaine, 7.5 mg/mL, was performed. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 45.7 min (range, 20 to 90 min); mean time of anesthesia was 71.3 min (range, 30 to 150 min). Among patients with pleural effusion, 23 effusions were simple and 16 effusions were complex. Talc was administrated in 28 patients. Complications were intraoperative bleeding (one patient), hyperpyrexia (eight patients), and atrial fibrillation (two patients). The mean time for removal of the chest drain was 5.6 days (range, 2 to 13 days). Postoperative hospital stay was 6.4 days (range, 2 to 14 days). No hospital mortality occurred. Follow-up is complete in all patients (mean, 92.8 days; range, 31 to 270 days). CONCLUSION: Four-step local anesthesia and sedation is a simple and effective method of performing a video-assisted thoracic procedure to diagnose and treat simple thoracic pathologies.

[Endoscopic approach to pulmonary diseases: Clinical utility of medical thoracoscopy in diagnosis of pleural diseases].

Thoracoscopy is useful for diagnosis of a number of lung diseases. We report our recent experience of medical thoracoscopy performed under local anesthesia in 142 cases. Of 124 patients with pleural effusion, 46 had pleuritis carcinomatosa, 11 had pleuritis tuberculosa, and 10 had malignant mesothelioma. We evaluated the utility of thoracoscopic observation and pleural biopsy in these three diseases. Almost of patients with malignant pleural effusion initially undiagnosed by the cytology of pleural effusion were diagnosed by thoracoscopy. Especially in malignant mesothelioma, thoracoscopy allowed accurate diagnosis. No serious complication was observed. Since medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia is a rapid, easy, safe, and well-tolerated procedure with an excellent diagnostic yield, it is recommended as a diagnostic procedure for cases with pleural effusion.

[Video-assisted bedside pleuroscopy under local anesthesia: use of a rigid cystoureteroscope in patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion].

Up to 20% of pleural effusions remain undiagnosed despite history-taking, physical examination, thoracentesis, and percutaneous closed pleural biopsy. The next diagnostic procedure used is often thoracoscopy under general anesthesia in an operating room. We report a technique for beside pleuroscopy and pleural biopsy that can be done without assistance of surgeons. We performed video-assisted pleuroscopy with a rigid cysto-ureteroscope in seven patients with pleural effusion that remained undiagnosed despite extensive clinical evaluation. A sterile 19.8 Fr. rigid cysto-ureteroscope was placed into the pleural space under local anesthesia. Pneumothorax was induced to enhance visualization of the surfaces. Forceps-biopsy specimens were taken of suspicious lesions on the parietal pleural. In three patients the pleural surface appeared smooth and in two the parietal pleural surface was studded. A localized coin-like lesion was seen in one patient, and extensive fibrinogenic adhesions and diffuse opacity of the parietal pleura was seen in another. Using this bedside procedure, we diagnosed pleural tuberculosis in three patients and pleural metastases of adenocarcinoma in one. When done under local anesthesia with a rigid cyst-ureteroscopy, video-assisted pleuroscopy can be a safe and useful diagnostic aid in patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion.