Sensory neuropathy as a manifestation of multiple acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency.

Multiple acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD) is a rare metabolic disorder which typically manifests with muscle weakness. However, despite late-onset MADD being treatable, it is often misdiagnosed, due in part to the heterogeneity of presentations. We report a case of late-onset MADD manifesting first as a sensory neuropathy before progressing to myopathic symptoms and acute metabolic decompensation. Early diagnostic workup with acylcarnitine profiling and organic acid analysis was critical in patient outcome; metabolic decompensation and myopathic symptoms were completely reversed with riboflavin supplementation and dietary modification, although sensory neuropathy persisted. Clinical consideration of MADD as part of the differential diagnosis of neuropathy with myopathy is crucial for a timely diagnosis and treatment of MADD.

TLDA: A transfer learning based dual-augmentation strategy for traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation in rare disease.

The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has demonstrated its significant medical value over the decades, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. TCM-AI interdisciplinary models have been proposed to model TCM knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment experiments in clinical practice. Among them, numerous models have been developed to simulate the syndrome differentiation process of human TCM doctors for automatic syndrome diagnosis. However, these models are designed for normal scenarios and trained using a supervised learning paradigm which needs tens of thousands of training samples. They fail to effectively differentiate syndromes in rare disease scenarios where the available TCM electronic medical records (EMRs) are very limited for each unique syndrome. To address the challenge of rare diseases, this study proposes a simple yet effective method called Transfer Learning based Dual-Augmentation (TLDA). TLDA aims to augment the limited EMRs at both the sample-level and feature-level, enriching the pathological and medical information during training. Extended experiments involving 11 comparison models, including the state-of-the-art model, demonstrate the effectiveness of TLDA. TLDA outperforms all comparison models by a significant margin. Furthermore, TLDA can also be extended to other medical tasks when the EMRs for diagnosis are limited in samples.

Qualified placebo for trials of herbal medicine treatment in rare diseases? A cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: While substantial placebos have been used in herbal medicine (HM) clinical trials for rare diseases, the use and quality of reporting of HM-placebo remain unclear. We aim to describe the use of HM-placebo in clinical trials for rare diseases and determine the quality of reporting in these trials. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, National Institute of Informatics Support Academic Information Services, ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from their inception date to 14 February 2023 to identify registered and published trials that use placebos as a comparator in rare diseases. We collected data on placebo use reporting and the efficacy and safety of placebo. Descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and Binary multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine the placebo characteristics of the HM trial and its effect on reporting. RESULTS: Among the 55 studies, we included that with a median administration time of placebo of 84 days (IQR 42-180) and a median placebo sample size of 30 (IQR 24-54). About half of the trials (27, 49.1%) did not provide their ethical approvals, and one trial had details of informed consent. None of the studies were fully reported and more than half of the items reported less than 50%. A total of 10 trials (18.2%) of placebo has active ingredients even though none of them performed pharmacological inert tests. Of the 29 studies with available data on adverse events, 5 (17.2%) trials did not show a better safety profile in the placebo group. Under the context that a relatively high-quality report is defined as a report with more than 9 items, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the rate of relatively high-quality reports of the administration time (p = 0.047, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.90), but the results are not representative. CONCLUSION: The overall situation of HM-placebo in the field of rare diseases was poor. In particular, the placebo is tied to the quality of trials, and poor placebo hinders the generation of high-quality evidence for herbal clinical trials in the field of rare diseases. We summarize the current methods of assessment involved in the use of placebos and propose various considerations for placebos in different contexts. Our study can greatly promote rare disease researchers to review the quality of their placebo and clinical trials. It is imperative to guarantee that meticulously conducted research generates clinical evidence of the highest caliber. We also expect that in the future, more rigorous relevant standards about the reporting and design of HM-placebo will be developed. High-quality clinical trials are the prerequisite for the wide clinical application of herbal medicines for rare diseases.

Clinical trials of orphan drugs in China over the decade 2012-2022: Opportunities and challenges.

Rare diseases refer to diseases with very low prevalence. Along with the support of national policies and improvement of research capability, a new landscape for orphan drug is emerging in China. To identity unmet clinical needs and provide insight on the development of orphan drugs, we reviewed the changes over time of orphan drug clinical trials in China from 2012 to 2022. A total of 261 trials of 40 drugs were initiated, of which 66.3% trials were sponsored by Chinese local pharmaceutical enterprises. Among the 261 trials, chemical drugs (about 63.6%) and biological products (35.6%) account for the high proportions, and traditional Chinese medicine (0.8%) was the least; the indications mainly focused on homozygous hypercholesterolemia, hemophilia, multiple sclerosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; single-arm study design was applied to 50% of the clinical trials, with an average sample size of 52 participants. Additionally, totally 122 trials were completed by January 2022, of which the average duration time was 15.7 months for new drug and 3.5 months for generic drug, respectively. The trends over time illustrated that remarkable progress has been achieved in development of orphan drugs in China since 2012. Given the large patient pool and the rising capability of innovation, it is believed that China will contribute more to the global drug pipelines for rare diseases.

Market access for medicines treating rare diseases: Association between specialised processes for orphan medicines and funding recommendations.

Access to medicines treating rare diseases ('orphan medicines') has proven challenging due to high prices and clinical uncertainty. To optimise market access to these medicines, some healthcare systems are implementing specialised pathways and/or processes during marketing authorisation (MA) and/or health technology assessment (HTA). Comparing one setting where these medicines are classed as "orphan" (Scotland) to another where they considered "non-orphan" (Canada), this study aims to explore whether the presence of specialised pathways and processes at MA and HTA levels is associated with more favourable funding recommendations and faster time to market access. A matched sample of 116 medicine-indication pairs with MA approval from 2001 to 2019 in Europe and Canada was identified, and publicly available sources were used for data extraction. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. All medicines were commercially marketed in both countries, except one instance in Scotland. In Scotland, more orphan medicines (68.1%) had a favourable HTA recommendation than in Canada (60.4%), while Canada issued more negative HTA recommendations (20.7%) than Scotland (15.5%). Low levels of agreement on HTA recommendations and the main reasons driving recommendations were found between settings. In both countries, medicines with specialised MA approval were less likely to receive negative HTA recommendations than medicines with standard MA. Time to market access was faster in Canada than Scotland, though medicines with specialised MA approval had slower timelines than medicines with standard MA approval in both countries. However, it is unclear whether the presence of orphan designation and HTA specialised processes alone could result in favourable funding recommendations without accounting for other healthcare system-related factors and differences in the decision-making processes across settings. Holistic approaches and better alignment of evidentiary requirements across regulators are needed to optimise access to orphan medicines.

Drug Repurposing in Rare Diseases: An Integrative Study of Drug Screening and Transcriptomic Analysis in Nephropathic Cystinosis.

Diagnosis and cure for rare diseases represent a great challenge for the scientific community who often comes up against the complexity and heterogeneity of clinical picture associated to a high cost and time-consuming drug development processes. Here we show a drug repurposing strategy applied to nephropathic cystinosis, a rare inherited disorder belonging to the lysosomal storage diseases. This approach consists in combining mechanism-based and cell-based screenings, coupled with an affordable computational analysis, which could result very useful to predict therapeutic responses at both molecular and system levels. Then, we identified potential drugs and metabolic pathways relevant for the pathophysiology of nephropathic cystinosis by comparing gene-expression signature of drugs that share common mechanisms of action or that involve similar pathways with the disease gene-expression signature achieved with RNA-seq.

Rhinofacial conidiobolomycosis: Clinical and microbiological characterisation and shift in the management of a rare disease.

BACKGROUND: Conidiobolomycosis is a rare tropical rhinofacial fungal infection which has not been well characterised. The available evidence in its management is sparse due to lack of clinical studies and the limited data on antifungal susceptibility patterns. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical manifestations, antifungal treatment and outcomes of patients with conidiobolomycosis and to determine antifungal susceptibility profiles of the isolates. PATIENTS/METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data of all patients with a diagnosis of conidiobolomycosis confirmed by histopathology and culture at a tertiary care hospital from 2012 to 2019 was done. RESULTS: There were 22 patients, 21 males and one female, with a mean age of 37.1 years. Most common presenting symptom was nasal obstruction, found in 20 (90.90%) patients. Patients who presented within 12 months had a better cure rate (85%) compared to those who presented late (67%). Among the 19 patients who had a follow-up, good outcome was seen in 15 of the 17 (88.24%) patients who were on itraconazole or potassium iodide containing regimen. Of the six patients who received additional trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), 67% showed good outcome with two patients showing complete cure and two patients still on treatment with significant improvement. High minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were noted for azoles and amphotericin B, whereas co-trimoxazole showed lowest MIC ranges. CONCLUSION: Itraconazole and potassium iodide are reasonable first-line options for the treatment of conidiobolomycosis. Good clinical response to KI and comparatively lower MIC of co-trimoxazole are promising. Further studies are required for developing clinical breakpoints that can predict therapeutic outcomes.

Analysis of clinical trials of new drugs in China as of 2019.

The research and development (R&D) of new drugs indicates scientific progress and economic development. However, little is known regarding ongoing or recent clinical trials in China. We analyzed data from clinical trials published before December 31, 2019, and found that the annual registration numbers are increasing annually in the country. Based on clinical indications, most tested drugs target cancers, nervous system, infections, and the cardiovascular system. Furthermore, clinical trials are mostly concentrated in Beijing, Shanghai, and Jiangsu, and conducted by large pharmaceutical companies, with multiple trials for several generic drugs. Going forward, it will be necessary to promote R&D in China of clinically relevant innovative drugs, drug delivery systems, and novel traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and biological products, as well as to have a balanced distribution of clinical trials to sustainably meet public health needs.

Imlifidase: First Approval.

Imlifidase (IdefirixTM), a cysteine protease derived from the immunoglobulin G (IgG)­degrading enzyme of Streptococcus (S.) pyogenes is being developed by Hansa Biopharma AB for treatment of transplant rejection and rare IgG-mediated autoimmune conditions. In August 2020, intravenous imlifidase received its first global approval in the EU for desensitization treatment of highly sensitized adult kidney transplant patients with positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor. Imlifidase is currently undergoing clinical evaluation for the prevention of kidney transplant rejection in the USA, Australia, France and Austria, and clinical development is underway for anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, and for Guillain-Barre syndrome in France, the UK and the Netherlands. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of imlifidase leading to this first approval for desensitization treatment of highly sensitized adult kidney transplant patients with positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor.

Analysing criteria for price and reimbursement of orphan drugs in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: There are differences between countries regarding data requirements for orphan drug evaluation and it  is also unknown which criteria might determine the price and reimbursement decision. This study aimed to identify the key  criteria for price and reimbursement of orphan drugs in Spain, approved by the European Commission, between January 2012 and June 2018. METHOD: A descriptive analysis of the orphan drugs and its characteristics was performed. Outcomes criteria assessed  were: therapeutic area, existence of alternative treatment, rarity of the disease, clinical trial outcomes and therapeutic  positioning report assessment. Hypotheses for each variable regarding Spanish pricing and reimbursement were made  and tested with two regression analyses. RESULTS: Out of 78 orphan drugs approved by the European Commission, 82.1% asked pricing and reimbursement in  Spain. From this, 43.8% had pricing and reimbursement approved and 20.3% rejected. Mean time from Spanish  marketing authorisation approval to pricing and reimbursement approval was 12.1 ± 5.1 months. Having a positive  therapeutic positioning report and no therapeutic alternatives would be associated with a positive pricing and  reimbursement in Spain. CONCLUSIONS: It remains challenging to establish which are the driving criteria for pricing and reimbursement approval  of orphan drugs in Spain. Further research should be done including other variables that might influence the pricing and  reimbursement final decision in Spain.

Objetivo: Los requisitos para la evaluación de los medicamentos huérfanos difieren entre los países  miembros de la Unión Europea y tampoco se sabe qué criterios influyen en la decisión final sobre  precio y financiación. Este estudio ha tenido como objetivo identificar los criterios clave para establecer el precio y la financiación de los medicamentos huérfanos en España, una vez  aprobados por la Comisión Europea, entre enero de 2012 hasta junio de 2018.Método: Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los medicamentos huérfanos y sus características. Los  criterios evaluados fueron: área terapéutica, existencia de tratamientos alternativos, rareza de la  enfermedad, tipo de resultados de los ensayos clínicos e informe de posicionamiento terapéutico. Para  cada variable se estableció una hipótesis con respecto a la aprobación de precio y  financiación y se analizaron con dos análisis de regresión.Resultados: De las 78 aprobaciones de medicamentos huérfanos realizadas por la Comisión Europea,  el 82,1% solicitaron precio y financiación en España. De estas, el 43,8% fueron aprobadas  y el 20,3% fueron rechazadas. El tiempo medio desde la aprobación de la autorización de comercialización en España hasta la aprobación del precio y la financiación fue de 12,1 ± 5,1  meses. Un informe de posicionamiento positivo y la falta de alternativas terapéuticas se asociaría con  una aprobación de precio y financiación.Conclusiones: Sigue siendo un reto establecer cuáles son los criterios clave para la aprobación de los  medicamentos huérfanos en España. Los próximos estudios deberían incluir un mayor número de  variables que puedan influir en el precio y la decisión de financiación.

New Therapeutic Uses for Existing Drugs.

Eighty percent of drugs that enter human clinical testing are never approved for use. This means that for every five drugs that make it into the clinic, there are four that failed to show effectiveness for treating the disease or condition the drug was designed to treat.This high failure rate means there are many existing, partially developed therapeutic candidates with known pharmacology, formulation, and potential toxicity. Finding new uses for existing experimental drugs or biologics "repositioning" builds upon previous research and development efforts, so new candidate therapies can be advanced to clinical trials for a new use more quickly than starting from scratch.Federal funding initiatives in the U.S. and UK started to support pre-clinical /or early stage trials for repositioning existing experimental drugs or biologics (therapies). This chapter covers some of the process issues that have been solved and the remaining challenges that are still in need of solutions. The chapter is primarily written from a U.S. federal funding perspective. The general concepts could be applied more globally to benefit rare and neglected disease populations. The drug development and process bottlenecks are the same for both rare and common disease.

Failures to further developing orphan medicinal products after designation granted in Europe: an analysis of marketing authorisation failures and abandoned drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The research and development process in the field of rare diseases is characterised by many well-known difficulties, and a large percentage of orphan medicinal products do not reach the marketing approval.This work aims at identifying orphan medicinal products that failed the developmental process and investigating reasons for and possible factors influencing failures. DESIGN: Drugs designated in Europe under Regulation (European Commission) 141/2000 in the period 2000-2012 were investigated in terms of the following failures: (1) marketing authorisation failures (refused or withdrawn) and (2) drugs abandoned by sponsors during development.Possible risk factors for failure were analysed using statistically validated methods. RESULTS: This study points out that 437 out of 788 designations are still under development, while 219 failed the developmental process. Among the latter, 34 failed the marketing authorisation process and 185 were abandoned during the developmental process. In the first group of drugs (marketing authorisation failures), 50% reached phase II, 47% reached phase III and 3% reached phase I, while in the second group (abandoned drugs), the majority of orphan medicinal products apparently never started the development process, since no data on 48.1% of them were published and the 3.2% did not progress beyond the non-clinical stage.The reasons for failures of marketing authorisation were: efficacy/safety issues (26), insufficient data (12), quality issues (7), regulatory issues on trials (4) and commercial reasons (1). The main causes for abandoned drugs were efficacy/safety issues (reported in 54 cases), inactive companies (25.4%), change of company strategy (8.1%) and drug competition (10.8%). No information concerning reasons for failure was available for 23.2% of the analysed products. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that failures occurred in 27.8% of all designations granted in Europe, the main reasons being safety and efficacy issues. Moreover, the stage of development reached by drugs represents a specific risk factor for failures.

High-content drug screening for rare diseases.

Per definition, rare diseases affect only a small number of subjects within a given population. Taken together however, they represent a considerable medical burden, which remains poorly addressed in terms of treatment. Compared to other diseases, obstacles to the development of therapies for rare diseases include less extensive physiopathology knowledge, limited number of patients to test treatments, and poor commercial interest from the industry. Recently, advances in high-throughput and high-content screening (HTS and HCS) have been fostered by the development of specific routines that use robot- and computer-assisted technologies to automatize tasks, allowing screening of a large number of compounds in a short period of time, using experimental model of diseases. These approaches are particularly relevant for drug repositioning in rare disease, which restricts the search to compounds that have already been tested in humans, thereby reducing the need for extensive preclinical tests. In the future, these same tools, combined with computational modeling and artificial neural network analyses, may also be used to predict individual clinical responses to drugs in a personalized medicine approach.

Proceedings of the 2016 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: New Concepts in the Management of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases.

The Santa Fe Bone Symposium is an annual meeting of healthcare professionals and clinical researchers that details the clinical relevance of advances in knowledge of skeletal diseases. The 17th Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, on August 5-6, 2016. The program included plenary lectures, oral presentations by endocrinology fellows, meet-the-professor sessions, and panel discussions, all aimed to provide ample opportunity for interactive discussions among all participants. Symposium topics included recent developments in the translation of basic bone science to patient care, new clinical practice guidelines for postmenopausal osteoporosis, management of patients with disorders of phosphate metabolism, new and emerging treatments for rare bone diseases, strategies to enhance fracture healing, and an update on Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, using a teleconferencing platform to elevate the level of knowledge of healthcare professionals in underserved communities to deliver best practice care for skeletal diseases. The highlights and important clinical messages of the 2016 Santa Fe Bone Symposium are provided herein by each of the faculty presenters.

Precision medicine in rare disease: Mechanisms of disparate effects of N-carbamyl-l-glutamate on mutant CPS1 enzymes.

This study documents the disparate therapeutic effect of N-carbamyl-l-glutamate (NCG) in the activation of two different disease-causing mutants of carbamyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1). We investigated the effects of NCG on purified recombinant wild-type (WT) mouse CPS1 and its human corresponding E1034G (increased ureagenesis on NCG) and M792I (decreased ureagenesis on NCG) mutants. NCG activates WT CPS1 sub-optimally compared to NAG. Similar to NAG, NCG, in combination with MgATP, stabilizes the enzyme, but competes with NAG binding to the enzyme. NCG supplementation activates available E1034G mutant CPS1 molecules not bound to NAG enhancing ureagenesis. Conversely, NCG competes with NAG binding to the scarce M792I mutant enzyme further decreasing residual ureagenesis. These results correlate with the respective patient's response to NCG. Particular caution should be taken in the administration of NCG to patients with hyperammonemia before their molecular bases of their urea cycle disorders is known.

A case study of an integrative genomic and experimental therapeutic approach for rare tumors: identification of vulnerabilities in a pediatric poorly differentiated carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine approaches are ideally suited for rare tumors where comprehensive characterization may have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value. We describe the clinical case and molecular characterization of an adolescent with metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC). Given the rarity and poor prognosis associated with PDC in children, we utilized genomic analysis and preclinical models to validate oncogenic drivers and identify molecular vulnerabilities. METHODS: We utilized whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome analysis to identify germline and somatic alterations in the patient's tumor. In silico and in vitro studies were used to determine the functional consequences of genomic alterations. Primary tumor was used to generate a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model, which was used for in vivo assessment of predicted therapeutic options. RESULTS: WES revealed a novel germline frameshift variant (p.E1554fs) in APC, establishing a diagnosis of Gardner syndrome, along with a somatic nonsense (p.R790*) APC mutation in the tumor. Somatic mutations in TP53, MAX, BRAF, ROS1, and RPTOR were also identified and transcriptome and immunohistochemical analyses suggested hyperactivation of the Wnt/ß-catenin and AKT/mTOR pathways. In silico and biochemical assays demonstrated that the MAX p.R60Q and BRAF p.K483E mutations were activating mutations, whereas the ROS1 and RPTOR mutations were of lower utility for therapeutic targeting. Utilizing a patient-specific PDX model, we demonstrated in vivo activity of mTOR inhibition with temsirolimus and partial response to inhibition of MEK. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical case illustrates the depth of investigation necessary to fully characterize the functional significance of the breadth of alterations identified through genomic analysis.

Nursing Management of Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and lethal skin cancer with few known treatment options. Management of this disease is challenging, and oncology nurses must understand the medical, physical, and psychosocial burden that MCC places on the patient and family caregivers. Patients must navigate a complex medical and insurance network that often fails to support patients with rare cancers. Nurses must advocate for these patients to ensure quality comprehensive cancer care.