Socioeconomic differences in the utilization of diagnostic imaging and non-pharmaceutical conservative therapies for spinal diseases.

BACKGROUND: A different utilization of health care services due to socioeconomic status on the same health plan contradicts the principle of equal treatment. We investigated the presence and magnitude of socioeconomic differences in utilization of diagnostic imaging and non-pharmaceutical conservative therapies for patients with spinal diseases. METHODS: The cohort study based on routine healthcare data from Germany with 11.7 million patient-years between 2012 and 2016 for patients with physician-confirmed spinal diseases (ICD-10: M40-M54), occupation and age 20 to 64 years. A Poisson model estimated the effects of the socioeconomic status (school education, professional education and occupational position) for the risk ratio of receiving diagnostic imaging (radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) and non-pharmaceutical conservative therapies (physical therapy including exercise therapy, manual therapy and massage, spinal manipulative therapy, acupuncture). RESULTS: Patients received diagnostic imaging in 26%, physical therapy in 32%, spinal manipulative therapy in 25%, and acupuncture in 4% of all patient-years. Similar to previous survey-based studies higher rates of utilization were associated with higher socioeconomic status. These differences were most pronounced for manual therapy, exercise therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in health care utilization were highly related to socioeconomic status. Socioeconomic differences were higher for more expensive health services. Further research is necessary to identify barriers to equitable access to health services and to take appropriate action to decrease existing social disparities.

Providing Epidemiological Data in Lumbar Spine Imaging Reports Did Not Affect Subsequent Utilization of Spine Procedures: Secondary Outcomes from a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of inserting epidemiological information into lumbar spine imaging reports on subsequent nonsurgical and surgical procedures involving the thoracolumbosacral spine and sacroiliac joints. DESIGN: Analysis of secondary outcomes from the Lumbar Imaging with Reporting of Epidemiology (LIRE) pragmatic stepped-wedge randomized trial. SETTING: Primary care clinics within four integrated health care systems in the United States. SUBJECTS: 238,886 patients ≥18 years of age who received lumbar diagnostic imaging between 2013 and 2016. METHODS: Clinics were randomized to receive text containing age- and modality-specific epidemiological benchmarks indicating the prevalence of common spine imaging findings in people without low back pain, inserted into lumbar spine imaging reports (the "LIRE intervention"). The study outcomes were receiving 1) any nonsurgical lumbosacral or sacroiliac spine procedure (lumbosacral epidural steroid injection, facet joint injection, or facet joint radiofrequency ablation; or sacroiliac joint injection) or 2) any surgical procedure involving the lumbar, sacral, or thoracic spine (decompression surgery or spinal fusion or other spine surgery). RESULTS: The LIRE intervention was not significantly associated with subsequent utilization of nonsurgical lumbosacral or sacroiliac spine procedures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.09; P = 0.79) or any surgical procedure (OR = 0.99, 95 CI 0.91-1.07; P = 0.74) involving the lumbar, sacral, or thoracic spine. The intervention was also not significantly associated with any individual spine procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Inserting epidemiological text into spine imaging reports had no effect on nonsurgical or surgical procedure utilization among patients receiving lumbar diagnostic imaging.

The clinical utility of routine spinal radiographs by chiropractors: a rapid review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: When indicated by signs or symptoms of potentially serious underlying pathology (red flags), chiropractors can use radiographs to inform their diagnosis. In the absence of red flags, the clinical utility of routine or repeat radiographs to assess the structure and function of the spine is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of routine or repeat radiographs (in the absence of red flags) of the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine for the functional or structural evaluation of the spine. Investigate whether functional or structural findings on repeat radiographs are valid markers of clinically meaningful outcomes. The research objectives required that we determine the validity, diagnostic accuracy and reliability of radiographs for the structural and functional evaluation of the spine. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to November 25, 2019. We used rapid review methodology recommended by the World Health Organization. Eligible studies (cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, randomized controlled trials, diagnostic and reliability) were critically appraised. Studies of acceptable quality were included in our synthesis. The lead author extracted data and a second reviewer independently validated the data extraction. We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the evidence. FINDINGS: We identified 959 citations, screened 176 full text articles and critically appraised 23. No relevant studies assessed the clinical utility of routine or repeat radiographs (in the absence of red flags) of the cervical, thoracic or lumbar spine for the functional or structural evaluation of the spine. No studies investigated whether functional or structural findings on repeat radiographs are valid markers of clinically meaningful outcomes. Nine low risk of bias studies investigated the validity (n = 2) and reliability (n = 8) of routine or repeat radiographs. These studies provide no evidence of clinical utility. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that the use of routine or repeat radiographs to assess the function or structure of the spine, in the absence of red flags, improves clinical outcomes and benefits patients. Given the inherent risks of ionizing radiation, we recommend that chiropractors do not use radiographs for the routine and repeat evaluation of the structure and function of the spine.

Massage manipulation vs. low back muscle exercise for lumbar intervertebral instability: A preliminary randomized clinical trial.

This is a preliminary randomized clinical trial on patients conducted at Wuxi Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from September 2015 to December 2016. The patients with intervertebral instability were randomized 1:1 for massage (20 min/day for 6 days) or exercise (3 sessions/day for 15 days). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry disability score, and quantitative fluoroscopy (QF) were performed before and after the treatment and at 1 and 3 months thereafter. Improvement rates were noted to be 86.7% and 40.0% in the massage and exercise groups, respectively. Massage group showed significant changes in the JOA and Oswestry disability scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), while the exercise group did not show any significant change (p > 0.05). Changes in the JOA and Oswestry disability scores were more important in the massage group (p < 0.05). All dynamic imaging parameters were improved in the massage group (all p < 0.05) but not in the exercise group (all p>0.05). These results suggest that the massage manipulation could be an appropriate way to treat intervertebral instability.

Lumbar vertebral osteoradionecrosis: a rare case report with 10-year follow-up and brief literature review.

BACKGROUND: Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication that occurs after radiotherapy for head or neck malignancies. ORN of the spine is rare, with only few cases affecting the cervical spine reported to date. To our knowledge, no case of lumbar ORN has been reported. We report a rare case of ORN in the lumbar spine that occurred 2 years after radiotherapy and perform a literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of lumbar ORN that occurred 2 years after radiotherapy for gallbladder carcinoma. The patient was successfully treated conservatively and followed up for > 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: ORN of the spine is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Spinal ORN is clinically described as a chronic disease with a slow onset. The most common presenting symptom of spinal ORN is pain. However, as ORN progresses, spinal kyphosis and instability can lead to neurological compression and thus to induced myelopathy or radiculopathy. Treatment of spinal ORN is comprehensive, including orthosis, medication, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, surgery, and new treatment combinations of pentoxifylline and tocopherol. The surgical rate for spinal ORN is relatively high.

How I do it? Transforaminal endoscopic decompression of intraspinal facet cyst.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery provides equivalent results to open surgery with added advantages of feasibility under local anesthesia, no injury to posterior elements, preservation of the ligamentum flavum, ease of revision surgery, and cost-effectiveness. The technique of transforaminal endoscopic excision of cysts of facet or zygapophyseal joints is scarcely described in literature. METHODS: The transforaminal endoscopy is applicable to cyst lying in the extraforaminal, foraminal, and intraspinal regions. The "mobile" outside-in technique combined with osteotomy of the tip of the superior articular process facilitates intraspinal access for complete decompression. CONCLUSION: Transforaminal endoscopic removal of the facet cyst is a viable alternative to traditional open surgery with added advantages of a minimal access procedure.

[Interventional radiology to treat vertebral diseases]. / La radiologie interventionnelle en pathologie rachidienne.

The vertebroplasty is based on intracorporeal acrylic resin injection. Its 2 main objectives are analgesia and bone consolidation. Its main indications are painful and inflammatory fractures on a site of osteopathic fragility and bone metastases. Its clinical efficacy is strongly correlated with a treatment performed within 3 months post fracture. Transpedicular acrylic resin injection is performed under scopic control in order to continuously follow the intra-corporeal filling of the cement and thus limit the risk of complications. Main risks of vertebroplasty are rare and represented by the risk of extracorporeal leak, disc, foraminal, in the epidural space, the periventricular and epidural veins or the inferior vena cava or the lung about acrylic resin injection. For the spinal tumoral pathology, each file is the subject of a multidisciplinary discussion where essential elements to the global care of the patients are necessary to collect and to take into account, in particular the general state of the patient and its life expectancy and the goal of treatment (curative or palliative). The main techniques of hot ablathermy are represented by laser, radio frequency or microwaves and cold ablathermy by cryoablation. Different guidance techniques (fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, etc.) are available to interventional radiologists to perform their actions in conditions of maximum safety and efficiency. It is necessary to put in place a passive protection (thermocouple or electrostimulation) or active protection (displacement of the organs, insufflation of CO2, hydro-dissection, cooling or warming) of the neighboring organs, in particular of the nerves.

Fully Endoscopic Lumbar Laminectomy and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of a case series of 18 patients who underwent fully endoscopic foraminotomy, laminectomy, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous screw fixation. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of a single surgeon. Average age of patients was 66 years (range, 51-82 years). All patients had grade I or grade II spondylolisthesis and severe central canal stenosis. Patients underwent endoscopic transforaminal access through Kambin triangle for foraminotomy, discectomy, endplate preparation, and interbody fusion, which was followed by fully endoscopic unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression and percutaneous pedicle screw and connecting rod placement. RESULTS: All procedures were successful without conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time was 168 minutes, and average estimated blood loss was 36 mL. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.2 days. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Comparison of preoperative and final clinical metrics demonstrated that average Oswestry Disability Index score improved from 48 ± 14 (range, 37-61) to 13 ± 11 (range, 0-27) (P < 0.001). Average visual analog scale back pain score improved from 8.1 ± 2.0 (range, 6.8-10.0) to 1.8 ± 0.9 (range, 0.0-3.5) (P < 0.001). Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale back pain scores at last follow-up showed 73% and 78% improvement, respectively, from the preoperative period. There were no cases of nonunion clinically or radiographically on final follow-up of >12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Fully endoscopic laminectomy and interbody fusion under conscious sedation is an effective treatment with minimal complications for patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and severe spinal stenosis.

Preoperative Assessment of Bone Quality in Spine Deformity Surgery: Correlation With Clinical Practice and Published Recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to (A) evaluate preoperative bone quality assessment and intervention practice over time and (B) review the current evidence for bone evaluation in spine fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Deformity spine surgery has demonstrated improved quality of life in patients; however, its cost has made it controversial. If preoperative bone quality can be optimized then potentially these treatments could be more durable; however, at present, no clinical practice guidelines have been published by professional spine surgical organizations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review was performed on patients who underwent a minimum five-level primary or revision fusion. Preoperative bone quality metrics were evaluated over time from 2012 to 2017 to find potential trends. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and spine fusion region. RESULTS: Patient characteristics including preoperative rates of pseudarthrosis and junctional failure did not change. An increasing trend of physician bone health documentation was noted (P = 0.045) but changes in other metrics were not significant. A sex bias favored females who had higher rates of preoperative DXA studies (P = 0.001), Vitamin D 25-OH serum labs (P = 0.005), Vitamin D supplementation (P = 0.022), calcium supplementation (P < 0.001), antiresorptive therapy (P = 0.016), and surgeon clinical documentation of bone health (P = 0.008) compared with men. CONCLUSION: Our spine surgeons have increased documentation of bone health discussions but this has not affected bone quality interventions. A discrepancy exists favoring females over males in nearly all preoperative bone quality assessment metrics. Preoperative vitamin D level and BMD assessment should be considered in patients undergoing long fusion constructs; however, the data for bone anabolic and resorptive agents have less support. Clinical practice guidelines on preoperative bone quality assessment spine patients should be defined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Percutaneous albumin/doxycycline injection versus open surgery for aneurysmal bone cysts in the mobile spine.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous doxycycline/albumin injection for spinal aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) as an alternative to open surgery. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2016, 25 patients who had no/minor neurological deficits (modified Frankel scale D or E) and acceptable local stability (spinal instability neoplastic score < 12) were included in the study, of whom 14 were treated with percutaneous doxycycline/albumin injection (injection group) and 11 were treated with open surgery (surgery group). The demographic and clinical information of the injection and surgery groups were recorded and compared. RESULTS: In the injection group, lesion size was significantly reduced in all 14 patients, all patients showed complete neurological recovery, and 13 patients had complete relief of neck pain; their mean visual analogue scale (VAS) decreased from 3.4 to 0.5. No complication or recurrence was observed during the mean 30.7-month follow-up (range, 24-50 months). In the surgery group, 9 patients had complete neurological recovery and 2 patients had residual slight paresthesia; their mean VAS decreased from 3.4 to 0.5. Two had local recurrence during their follow-up at 66.5 months (range, 50-96 months). Compared with the surgery group, the injection group showed no significant difference in the rate of recurrence (P = 0.14) and complication (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous doxycycline/albumin injection for spinal ABCs can be safely and effectively performed in well-selected cases. It could serve as an alternative treatment, especially for spinal ABCs lesions with acceptable local stability and in patients without severe neurological deficits. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Benefits and pitfalls of iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) imaging in clinical application of the cervical spine MR.

AIM: To evaluate efficacy of T2-weighted (T2W) iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL)-fast spin echo (FSE) imaging of the cervical spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cervical spine of 100 symptomatic patients was imaged using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus IDEAL-FSE imaging. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), and image quality were analysed. To compare the diagnostic efficiency of degenerative spondylopathy, evaluations of spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc herniation, myelopathy, disc degeneration, and bone marrow oedema were also performed. RESULTS: IDEAL-FSE showed significantly higher SNRs and CNRs (all p<0.001) than fat-suppressed (FS) T2W-FSE. Sixteen of 100 patients had cervical spine instrumentation; in those patients, IDEAL-FSE provided significantly better uniformity of fat suppression (p<0.001) and fewer metallic artefacts (p<0.001). For patients without instrumentation, FS T2W-FSE showed significantly better overall image quality (p<0.001) and homogeneity of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; p<0.001) with fewer motion artefacts (p<0.001). IDEAL-FSE, however, provided significantly better uniformity of fat suppression (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the diagnoses of spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc herniation, or myelopathy between IDEAL and FS T2W images. The only significant differences between the IDEAL and FS T2W images were noted when diagnosing degenerative disc disease at the C2-3 and C5-6 disc levels (p=0.019, p=0.002, respectively) and bone marrow oedema at C3 vertebral body (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: T2W IDEAL-FSE imaging should only be considered as an additional sequence to conventional FS T2W images in patients with poor fat suppression or severe metallic artefacts.

The use of CT Hounsfield unit values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.

PURPOSES: Our purpose was to use computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield unit (HU) values to identify the undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS: A total of 334 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups according to the degree of lumbar degenerative changes in preoperative lumbar CT images. Patients who had at least three vertebrae with severe degeneration at L1-L4 were placed in the degenerative group, and others were placed in the control group. HU value of trabecular bone in middle axial CT image of vertebral body, T-score and bone mineral density (BMD) at L1-L4 and hips were measured. CT HU thresholds for osteoporosis were obtained from control group and then applied to identify undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis. RESULTS: There were 182 patients in the degenerative group and 152 patients in the control group. CT HU value had a positive correlation with T-score and BMD of lumbar spine in both groups (P < 0.001), while the correlation coefficients at L1-L4 were higher in the control group (> 0.7) than in the degenerative group (< 0.7). T-score and BMD of lumbar spine were higher in the degenerative group (P < 0.05), while CT HU value, T-score and BMD of hips had no significant difference between two groups. According to the linear regression equations of vertebral T-score and CT HU value in the control group, the thresholds matching T-score of - 2.5 were 110, 100, 85 and 80HU for L1, L2, L3 and L4, respectively. Defining CT osteoporosis as L1 ≤ 110HU or L2 ≤ 100HU or L3 ≤ 85HU or L4 ≤ 80HU was 88.5% (69/78) specific and 60.8% (45/74) sensitive for distinguishing DXA osteoporosis of lumbar spine in the control group. The rate of undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis was higher in the degenerative group than in the control group according to CT HU thresholds (38.7% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Degenerative changes in the lumbar spine can increase BMD and T-score provided by lumbar DXA, leading to an underestimation of vertebral osteoporosis. Thresholds for osteoporosis based on CT HU values can be used as a complementary method to identify undiagnosed spinal osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a less invasive surgical option commonly used for a variety of spinal conditions, including in high-risk patient populations. LLIF is often performed as a stand-alone procedure, and may be complicated by graft subsidence, the clinical ramifications of which remain unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize further the sequelae of graft subsidence following stand-alone LLIF. METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF between July 2008 and June 2015; 297 patients (623 levels) met inclusion criteria. Imaging studies were examined to grade graft subsidence according to Marchi criteria, and compared between those who required revision surgery and those who did not. Additional variables recorded included levels fused, DEXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) T-score, body mass index, and routine demographic information. The data were analyzed using the Student t-test, chi-square analysis, and logistic regression analysis to identify potential confounding factors. RESULTS Of 297 patients, 34 (11.4%) had radiographic evidence of subsidence and 18 (6.1%) required revision surgery. The median subsidence grade for patients requiring revision surgery was 2.5, compared with 1 for those who did not. Chi-square analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of revision surgery in patients with high-grade subsidence compared with those with low-grade subsidence. Seven of 18 patients (38.9%) requiring revision surgery suffered a vertebral body fracture. High-grade subsidence was a significant predictor of the need for revision surgery (p < 0.05; OR 12, 95% CI 1.29-13.6), whereas age, body mass index, T-score, and number of levels fused were not. This relationship remained significant despite adjustment for the other variables (OR 14.4; 95% CI 1.30-15.9). CONCLUSIONS In this series, more than half of the patients who developed graft subsidence following stand-alone LLIF required revision surgery. When evaluating patients for LLIF, supplemental instrumentation should be considered during the index surgery in patients with a significant risk of graft subsidence.

Clinical outcome following anterior arthrodesis in patients with presumed sacroiliac joint pain.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that in 13-32% of patients with chronic low back pain, the pain may originate in the sacroiliac (SI) joints. When treatment of these patients with analgesics and physiotherapy has failed, a surgical solution may be discussed. Results of such surgery are often based on small series, retrospective analyses or studies using a minimal invasive technique, frequently sponsored by manufacturers. PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcome concerning pain, function and quality of life following anterior arthrodesis in patients presumed to have SI joint pain using validated questionnaires pre- and post-operatively. An additional aim was to describe the symptoms of the patients included and the preoperative investigations performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 6 year period we treated 55 patients, all women, with a mean age of 45 years (range 28-65) and a mean pelvic pain duration of 9.1 years (range 2-30). The pain started in connection with minor trauma in seven patients, pregnancy in 20 and unspecified in 28. All patients had undergone long periods of treatment including physiotherapy, manipulation, needling, pelvic belt, massage and chiropractic without success, and 15 had been operated for various spinal diagnoses without improvement. The patients underwent thorough neurological investigation, plain X-ray and MRI of the spine and plain X-ray of the pelvis. They were investigated by seven clinical tests aimed at indicating pain from the SI joints. In addition, all patients underwent a percutaneous mechanical provocation test and extra-articular local anaesthetic blocks against the posterior part of the SI joints. Before surgery all patients answered the generic Short-Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, the disease specific Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders (BIS) questionnaire and rated their level of pelvic and leg pain (VAS, 0-100). At follow-up at a mean of 2 years 49 patients completed the same questionnaires (89%). RESULTS: At follow-up 26 patients reported a lower level of pelvic pain than before surgery, 16 the same level and six a higher level. Applying Svensson's method RPpelvic pain=0.3976, with 95% CI (0.2211, 0.5740) revealed a statistically significant systematic improvement in pelvic pain. At follow-up 28 patients reported a higher quality of life and 26 reported sleeping better than pre-operatively. In most patients the character of the pelvic pain was dull and aching, often accompanied by a stabbing component in connection with sudden movements. Referred pain down the leg/s even to the feet and toes was noted by half of the patients and 29 experienced frequency of micturition. CONCLUSIONS: It is apparent that in some patients the SI joints may cause long-term pain that can be treated by arthrodesis. We speculate that continued pain despite a healed arthrodesis may be due to persistent pain from adjacent ligaments. The next step should be a prospective randomized study comparing posterior fusion and ligament resection with non-surgical treatment. IMPLICATIONS: Anterior arthrodesis can apparently relieve pain in some patients with presumed SI joint pain. The problem is how to identify these patients within the low back pain group.

Long-term Radiological and Clinical Outcomes After Using Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Concentrate Obtained With Selective Retention Cell Technology in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the use of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell concentrate obtained with selective cell retention technology using Cellect with a particular collagen scaffold, Healos for posterolateral spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: With the increasing rate of spinal fusion, the problem of pseudarthrosis, which contributes to recurrent pain with patient disability, is considered to be the most common cause of revision lumbar spine surgery. Intensive research is being carried out to develop an alternative source of bone grafting and improve the spinal fusion rate. METHODS: A retrospective review of hospital records was performed. Identified patients were contacted to have a clinical and radiological evaluation follow-up. Clinical outcome was evaluated using visual analog scales for the back pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and quality of life (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Radiological outcome was evaluated by performing dynamic flexion/extension lateral views and calculation of segmental Cobb angle. Any implant-associated complication was reported. Computed tomography (CT) scans were also performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included and all patients achieved successful fusion. The mean difference of the segmental Cobb angle was 0.48° (range 0.3°-0.7°). Computed tomography scans showed solid bilateral fusion with bridging bone (Grade I) in all patients, but solid unilateral fusion with bridging bone (Grade II) was detected for one patient at one level. Patients started to resume working activities within a mean period of 3.5 months. The VAS score for the residual back pain was 4.1 ±â€Š2.1, whereas the ODI was 10.5 ±â€Š5.6 points, and the mean disability index was 21.1%. CONCLUSION: The use of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell concentrate obtained with selective cell retention technology could be considered as an effective means for augmenting spinal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Test-Retest Reliability of Measuring the Vertebral Arterial Blood Flow Velocity in People With Cervicogenic Dizziness.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the within-session and between-sessions reliability of measuring the vertebral artery blood flow velocities in people with cervicogenic dizziness using Doppler ultrasound at both upper and lower cervical levels. METHODS: Outcome measures were taken on 2 occasions 3 weeks apart with no active treatment provided in between the assessments on 12 participants. Pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound was used to quantify time-averaged mean velocities through the vertebral artery at upper cervical (C0-1) and lower cervical vertebrae (C5-6). The clinical outcome measures were also recorded in people with cervicogenic dizziness. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the within-session and between-session repeatability. Paired t test was used to determine the differences in the time-averaged mean velocities of blood flow at the same site of the vertebral artery and the clinical outcome measures in 2 sessions 3 weeks apart. RESULTS: In people with cervicogenic dizziness, there was no significant change in both clinical outcome measures and the time-averaged mean velocities when the patients were measured 3 weeks apart (P > .05). This study identified good within-session (ICC: 0.903-0.967) and between-session (ICC: 0.922-0.984) repeatability in measuring the vertical blood flow velocities in patients with cervicogenic dizziness when the clinical outcome measures were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of Doppler ultrasound to identify changes in mean vertebral arterial blood flow velocities before and after intervention in people with cervicogenic dizziness in future studies.

Fluoroscopy-guided infiltration for pain reduction in patients with Baastrup's disease: clinical experience and results.

OBJECTIVE: Baastrup disease refers to degenerative changes of adjacent spinous processes with resultant back pain. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous, fluoroscopy-guided infiltrations in a consecutive series of patients suffering from Baastrup disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 until December 2013, 55 patients suffering from Baastrup disease (diagnosed clinically and by imaging findings) underwent percutaneous, fluoroscopy-guided infiltration. The position of the needle (22-gauge spinal needle) was fluoroscopically verified at the level of interspinous ligament. Then a mixture of long-acting corticosteroid with local anesthetic (1.5/1 cc) was injected. A questionnaire with NVS scale helped in assessing pain relief degree, life quality, and mobility improvement. RESULTS: In the patients of our study, a total of 67 sessions was performed. In 12/55 patients (22%), a second infiltration was performed within 7-10 days apart from the first one. The end point was 1 year post-treatment. Patients were followed 1 week after the first injection for a subsequent treatment and then if asymptomatic re-controlled in 3-6 and 12 months. Comparing the pain scores prior (mean value, 8.18 ± 1.44 NVS units) and after (mean value, 0.62 ± 0.93 NVS units) there was a mean decrease of 7.56 ± 1.68 NVS units (p < 0.001) on terms of pain reduction, effect upon mobility and life quality. There were no clinically significant complications noted in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy-guided infiltrations seem to be a feasible, efficacious, and safe approach for pain reduction and mobility improvement in patients with Baastrup disease.

Treatment of a spinal aneurysmal bone cyst using combined image-guided cryoablation and cementoplasty.

The authors describe the case of a 6.6-cm symptomatic spinal aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) in a 17-year-old athlete treated percutaneously. Surgical treatment was not considered as the first option owing to its invasiveness and associated morbidity. CT-guided cryoablation of the expansile part of the ABC was performed for tumour shrinkage and nerve decompression. Thermal insulation, temperature monitoring and functional control/electrostimulation of the neural structures at risk were applied. Finally, the bony defect was cemented. No complications occurred during the procedure. Complete resolution of the ABC on imaging and clinical improvement were achieved. Percutaneous cryoablation should be considered as an alternative treatment option, especially when tumour size reduction is desired.

Impact of imaging guidelines on X-ray use among American provider network chiropractors: interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Overuse and misuse of spine X-ray imaging for nonspecific back and neck pain persists among chiropractors. Distribution of educational materials among physicians results in small-to-modest improvements in appropriate care, such as ordering spine X-ray studies, but little is known about its impact among North American chiropractors. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of web-based dissemination of a diagnostic imaging guideline on the use of spine X-ray images among chiropractors. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Quasi-experimental design that used interrupted time series to evaluate the effect of guidelines dissemination on spine X-ray imaging claims by chiropractors enlisted in managed care network in the United States. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive adult patients consulting for complaints of spine disorders. OUTCOME MEASURES: A change in level (the mean number of spine X-ray imaging claims per month immediately after the introduction of the guidelines), change in trend (any differences between preintervention and postintervention slopes), estimation of monthly average intervention effect after the intervention. METHODS: The imaging guideline was disseminated online in April 2008. Administrative claims data were extracted between January 2006 and December 2010. Segmented regression analysis with autoregressive error was used to estimate the impact of guideline recommendations on the rate of spine X-ray studies. Sensitivity analysis considered the effect of two additional quality improvement strategies, a policy change and an education intervention. RESULTS: Time series analysis revealed a significant change in the level of spine X-ray study ordering weeks after introduction of the guidelines (-0.01; 95% confidence interval=-0.01, -0.002; p=.01), but no change in trend of the regression lines. The monthly mean rate of spine X-ray studies within 5 days of initial visit per new patient exams decreased by 10 per 1000, a 5.26% relative decrease after guideline dissemination. Controlling for two quality improvement strategies did not change the results. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based guideline dissemination was associated with an immediate reduction in spine X-ray imaging claims. Sensitivity analysis suggests our results are robust. This passive strategy is likely cost-effective in a chiropractic network setting.