Light-Induced Activation of a Specific Type-5 Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonist in the Ventrobasal Thalamus Causes Analgesia in a Mouse Model of Breakthrough Cancer Pain.

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) refers to a sudden and transient exacerbation of pain, which develops in patients treated with opioid analgesics. Fast-onset analgesia is required for the treatment of BTcP. Light-activated drugs offer a novel potential strategy for the rapid control of pain without the typical adverse effects of systemic analgesic drugs. mGlu5 metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists display potent analgesic activity, and light-induced activation of one of these compounds (JF-NP-26) in the thalamus was found to induce analgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. We used an established mouse model of BTcP based on the injection of cancer cells into the femur, followed, 16 days later, by systemic administration of morphine. BTcP was induced by injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1) into the tumor, 20 min after morphine administration. Mice were implanted with optic fibers delivering light in the visible spectrum (405 nm) in the thalamus or prelimbic cortex to locally activate systemically injected JF-NP-26. Light delivery in the thalamus caused rapid and substantial analgesia, and this effect was specific because light delivery in the prelimbic cortex did not relieve BTcP. This finding lays the groundwork for the use of optopharmacology in the treatment of BTcP.

Fentanyl pectin nasal spray for painful mucositis in head and neck cancers during intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of rapid onset opioid in a cohort of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients affected by painful mucositis influencing swallowing function during RT ± ChT with definitive or adjuvant intent. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conduct on HNC patients during RT ± ChT that received fentanyl pectin na sal spray (FPNS) for incidental BTP due to painful mucositis 13 min before the main meals. The period of observation has been 90 days starting from the beginning of RT ± ChT. RESULTS: Forty HNC patients with incidental BTP due to painful mucositis treated with FPNS were analyzed. The mean NRS of untreated episodes of BTP was 5.73 ± 1.54 decreasing to 2.25 ± 2.45 with FPNS (median dose 100 mcg). During the pain treatment, the number of meals increased from 2.08 ± 0.35 to 2.868 ± 0.4 (p = 0.000), and the BMI remained stable (from 25.086 ± 3.292 to 25.034 ± 3.090; p = 0.448). The 94.9% of patients was satisfied or very satisfied for the rapidity of the effect, and 97.4% for the easiness and convenience in the use. CONCLUSIONS: FPNS showed an acceptable safety activity profile in predictable BTP due to painful mucositis in HNC patients during RT ± ChT. FPNS was also effective in reducing the mucositis sequelae and allowing the completion of RT scheduled scheme. Moreover, patients declared satisfaction in terms of ease of use.

Facilitation of accurate and effective radiation therapy using fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) to reduce incidental breakthrough pain due to procedure positioning.

PURPOSE: To provide effective and accurate radiotherapy (RT) for advanced cancer patients who experience breakthrough pain (BP) due to positioning manoeuvres, through the use of FPNS. Secondary endpoints were the dose and time required to achieve a 50% numeric rating scale (NRS) reduction and conduction of a pharmacoeconomic analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven advanced cancer patients with moderate-severe BP associated with routine radiotherapy procedures and manoeuvres were selected to receive FPNS. Most patients (20/27) had bone metastases. The patients showed a low Karnovsky performance status (mean 54%; range: 30-80). BP intensity was scored with the NRS before and after the procedures that triggered it. All patients were already receiving opioid baseline treatment at a total dose equivalent to 40-160mg oral morphine. Before the procedure, BP was treated with 100-400µg of FPNS. Data related to tolerance, pain relief, onset of the relief and efficient dose to allow RT to proceed were collected. RESULTS: In 26 patients the BP score was reduced by at least 50% as determined in 15.5min (range 8-35min) after fentanyl pectin intranasal administration, and pain relief started after 7min (range 3-15min); p<0.05 in both cases. The duration of pain reduction facilitated the proceeding of RT. The Mean NRS score before the procedure was 9 (95%CI: 8.6-9.4) and decreased during procedure to 3 (95%CI: 2.5-3.8). The average dose of FPNS for most patients was 100-200µg to achieve pain control, except in three patients who required progressive doses of up to 300-400µg. After receiving 300µg, one patient dropped out of the study due to severe adverse effects (nausea). Seven patients reported minor undesirable effects related to FPNS administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Certain necessary RT procedures in advanced cancer patients can cause severe BP episodes. A simple, safe, fast acting and strong analgesic is needed. FPNS is a rapidly absorbed opioid analgesic with a pain relief profile that would be particularly well suited for this patient population. By reducing BP, the drug enables the completion of necessary RT procedures without needless patient discomfort. When BP is attenuated, Department productivity is maintained and unnecessary delays are avoided. Further studies and clinical trials are needed to assess therapeutic FPNS dosages with a view to defining efficacy in the correct clinical context.

Fentanyl pectin nasal spray as treatment for incident predictable breakthrough pain (BTP) in oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Painful mucositis is one of the most distressing toxicities of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), with the characteristics of incidental predictable breakthrough pain (BTP) during swallowing. Fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) could be a good therapeutic option. METHODS: Patients were prospectively considered if receiving basal analgesic therapy with opiates for painful mucositis of grade ⩾4 on a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. They were offered FPNS 100mcg before oral intake. When patients reached the effective dose, they evaluated the basal pain intensity before FPNS use and after 10, 20, 30 and 40min. RESULTS: Seventeen HNC patients were offered FPNS before oral intake, with 15 patients completing treatment. Mean reduction of incidental BTP intensity after FPNS was 3.1 points (range 1.2-5.8). Mean time elapsed since FPNS use and highest pain reduction was 26min. CONCLUSIONS: FPNS demonstrated activity against BTP when swallowing in HNC patients. These data should be considered as hypothesis-generating.

Intranasal fentanyl versus fentanyl pectin nasal spray for the management of breakthrough cancer pain in doses proportional to basal opioid regimen.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this randomized, crossover, comparison study was to assess the analgesic and adverse effects of 2 nasal preparations, intranasal fentanyl (INFS) and fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS), for breakthrough pain, given in doses proportional to opioid basal regimen. Each patient randomly received INFS or FPNS in doses proportional to opioid dosages used for background analgesia for 2 pairs of episodes. For each episode of breakthrough pain, pain intensity and adverse effects intensity were recorded just before starting the INFS or FPNS (T0) and 5 minutes (T5), 10 minutes (T10), and 20 minutes (T20) after the administration of the nasal drugs. Sixty-nine patients were studied. The mean age was 63.4 years, and 37 patients were males. For the present analysis, 188 episodes were considered. A statistical decrease in pain intensity was observed with both nasal drugs after 5, 10, and 20 minutes. A decrease in pain intensity of >33% was observed in 16, 102, and 159 treated episodes at T5, T10, and T20, respectively. Adverse effects were of mild nature in most cases or were preexistent because of basal opioid therapy. No differences were found in summed pain intensity difference 20 minutes after dosing. Most of patients did not find substantial preferences. INFS and FPNS were effective and well-tolerated treatments for breakthrough pain management. Both delivery systems, in doses proportional to the basal opioid regimen, provided significant analgesia within 10 minutes, without producing relevant adverse effects. PERSPECTIVE: This article showed that INFS and FPNS in doses proportional to basal opioid regimen are equally safe and effective for the management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients. These data provide new insights on the use of nasal preparations of fentanyl.

Cancer pain management in an oncological ward in a comprehensive cancer center with an established palliative care unit.

BACKGROUND: This survey was performed to draw information on pain prevalence, intensity, and management from a sample of patients who were admitted to an oncologic center where a palliative care unit (PCU) has been established for 13 years. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey in an oncological department performed 1 day per month for six consecutive months. RESULTS: Of the 385 patients, 69.1, 19.2, 8.6, and 3.1 % had no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain, respectively. Inpatients and patients with a low Karnofsky score showed higher levels of pain intensity (p < 0.0005). One hundred twenty-eight patients with pain or receiving analgesics were analyzed for pain management index (PMI). Only a minority of patients had negative PMI score, which was statistically associated with inpatient admission (p = 0.011). Fifty of these 128 patients had breakthrough pain (BTP), and all of them were receiving some medication for BTP. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the presence of PCU team providing consultation, advices, and cultural pressure, other than offering admissions for difficult cases had a positive impact on the use of analgesics, as compared with previous similar surveys performed in oncological setting, where a PCU was unavailable. This information confirms the need of the presence of a PCU in a high volume oncological department.

Long-term tolerability, efficacy and acceptability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray for breakthrough cancer pain.

PURPOSE: Previous studies show that fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) rapidly provides clinically meaningful pain relief in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). This study assessed the long-term tolerability, acceptability and consistency of effect of FPNS in patients with BTCP. METHODS: Patients (new and rolled over from earlier controlled studies) with cancer experiencing one to four episodes per day of BTCP whilst taking ≥ 60 mg/day of morphine (or equivalent) given orally for cancer pain entered an open-label 16-week safety study. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), withdrawal due to AEs and by nasal assessments. Acceptability assessments included ratings of overall satisfaction with each treated episode and ease of use and convenience of FPNS. Additional rescue medication and dose stability were used to evaluate the consistency of effect. RESULTS: Four hundred three patients were included in the safety and intent-to-treat analysis (42,227 episodes), 356 entered the treatment phase and 110 completed 16 weeks. Overall, 24.6% of 403 patients reported treatment-related treatment-emergent AEs that were generally mild/moderate and typical of opioids; 20 patients discontinued treatment due to an AE (9 were ADRs). Nasal assessments revealed no clinically significant effects; 94% of FPNS-treated episodes required no additional rescue medication. More than 90% of patients did not have to increase their dose during the study. Patients reported overall satisfaction with FPNS for 90.1% of episodes. At week 12, 96.9% of patients were satisfied with the ease of use and 97.9% with the convenience of FPNS. CONCLUSIONS: FPNS was generally well tolerated and well accepted for the treatment of BTCP, and doses remained stable over the 4-month study period.

Acupuncture: a treatment for breakthrough pain in cancer?

CONTEXT: Patients with chronic cancer pain frequently suffer severe exacerbations of pain intensity which are difficult to control adequately via pharmaceutical management. Management of these episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) presents a challenge both to the physician and the patient, and supplemental 'rescue' doses of opioids required to control BTP can produce intolerable side-effects and often do not act rapidly enough to provide adequate analgesia. There is very little evidence to support the use of acupuncture for BTP in cancer and few studies have considered the rapidity of the analgesic response to acupuncture for any type of pain. However, the available physiological evidence provides a convincing rationale and one which warrants research. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to debate the available physiological evidence for a rapid analgesic response to acupuncture in the context of the needs of the patient with cancer BTP, current interventions, acupuncture technique and the practical considerations involved in administering treatment rapidly and safely. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that acupuncture has the potential to produce rapid and effective analgesia when needles are inserted deeply enough and manipulated sufficiently. For cancer BTP this represents a possible adjunctive treatment, and consideration should be given to administering acupuncture alongside 'rescue' doses of medication to 'kick-start' the analgesic response before the medication takes effect. However, research is needed to provide evidence that acupuncture is effective for BTP in cancer, and the feasibility, practicality and safety of patients administering acupuncture themselves must also be taken into account.