Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular edema: biological impact, therapeutic effects, and safety.

PURPOSE: To introduce the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with subthreshold micropulse diode laser (SMPL), to summarize the biological impact, therapeutic effects, and safety of this treatment, and to discuss the response to DME when SMPL is combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or steroid. METHODS: The literature search was performed on the PubMed database, with a selection of English-language articles published from 2000 to 2023 with the following combinations of search terms: diabetes macular (o) edema, micropulse laser or subthreshold micropulse laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and steroid. RESULTS: SMPL is a popular, invisible retinal laser phototherapy that is inexpensive, safe, and effective in the treatment of DME. It can selectively target the retinal pigment epithelium, reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory factors, promote the absorption of macular edema, and exert a similar and lasting clinical effect to traditional lasers. No significant difference was found in the therapeutic effects of SMPL between different wavelengths. However, HbA1c level and pretreatment central macular thickness (CMT) may affect the therapeutic outcomes of SMPL. CONCLUSION: SMPL has a slow onset and produces lasting clinical effects similar to conventional photocoagulation. It has been reported that SMPL combined with the intravitreal anti-VEGF injection can significantly reduce the number of injections without influencing the therapeutic effect, which is essential for clinical applications and research. Although 577 nm SMPL is widely used clinically, there are no standardized protocols for SMPL. Additionally, some important problems regarding the treatment of SMPL require further discussion and exploration.

Analysis of the Macular Region Following Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes. Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the established treatment for mitigating severe visual impairment resulting from proliferative DR. Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of PRP on the macular region in patients with DR, utilizing optical coherence tomography (OCT) for assessment. Design: An experimental study was meticulously designed, implementing PRP as the primary intervention. Setting: The investigation was conducted within the Department of Ophthalmology at the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China. Participants: A total of 120 participants diagnosed with DR and undergoing treatment at our hospital were enrolled in the study. Interventions: The participants were randomly assigned to either the control group (CG, n = 60) or the study group (SG, n = 60). The CG received conventional drug treatment involving oral iodized lecithin, while the SG received PRP. OCT was employed to monitor changes in macular fovea volume and macular retinal thickness. Primary Outcome Measures: Evaluation criteria encompassed clinical efficacy, macular fovea volume, macular retinal thickness, IL-6 and VEGF levels, incidence of adverse reactions, and quality of life in both groups. Results: The study resulted in a higher total effective rate in the SG (96.67%) compared to the CG (80.00%) (χ2 = 8.09, P < .05). Post-treatment, reductions were observed in macular fovea volume and macular retinal thickness, with significantly lower SG values than CG values (P < .05). Both serum IL-6 and VEGF levels exhibited reductions in both groups after treatment, with the SG displaying a more significant decrease compared to the CG (P < .05). The occurrence of adverse reactions significantly decreased in the SG relative to the CG (P < .05). Quality of life scores for the SG was notably elevated compared to the CG (P < .05). Conclusions: PRP emerges as a highly valuable approach in the management of DR. It contributes to retinal thickness improvement within the macular region and inflammation reduction, and also enhances therapeutic outcomes, minimizes adverse reactions, and optimizes patients' quality of life. These findings warrant further clinical adoption and widespread promotion.

Persistent diabetic macular edema: Definition, incidence, biomarkers, and treatment methods.

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.

Unusual Presentation of Acute Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of cystoid macular edema (CME) as a presentation of acute hydroxychloroquine-related retinal toxicity. OBSERVATIONS: A 37-year-old female patient visited our ophthalmology department in October 2019 complaining of bilateral blurred vision and metamorphopsia for 3 days. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/7.5 in the left eye under the Snellen E chart. Before presentation, she had taken hydroxychloroquine as a "reproduction-facilitating medication" prior to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures with the daily dose of 200 mg for 1 week in March 2019 and 400 mg for 1 month in September 2019. She also took a combination of several herbal medicine including "Angelica sinensis" for 6 months in this period. On examination, typical signs of hydroxychloroquine maculopathy such as bilateral paracentral retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change in blue autofluorescence and loss of the paracentral ellipsoid zone in optical coherence tomography ("flying saucer sign") were noted. CME was also found in fluorescein angiography. Her symptoms improved gradually after cessation of hydroxychloroquine and herb medicine without any further treatment. Resolution of bilateral CME was revealed at 16 weeks with final bilateral BCVA 6/6. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although rare, acute hydroxychloroquine maculopathy could occur in patients with concomitant usage of medications that could interfere with P450 enzymes system. Careful acquisition of drug history and serial ophthalmological examinations are advised in using hydroxychloroquine for disease management even for a short period of time.

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome of treatment with bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Concomitant vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is speculated to aggravate diabetic macular edema (DME). We aimed to determine the effect of hypovitaminosis D correction on the outcome of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in DME eyes. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 83 eyes of 83 patients with DME were recruited and divided into three groups: normal vitamin D levels + IVB administration (Group 1), vitamin D insufficient/deficient + IVB administration (Group 2), and vitamin D insufficient/deficient + IVB administration + oral vitamin D supplementation (Group 3). Participants were followed for 6 months after the intervention. Visual (corrected distance visual acuity, CDVA) and anatomical (central macular thickness, CMT) outcomes of intervention were evaluated 1, 3, and 6 months after three monthly loading doses of IVB were given. Serum vitamin D levels were measured 1 and 6 months after the third IVB administration. RESULTS: A total of 29, 26, and 28 eyes were enrolled in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In months 1, 3, and 6, after the three basic loading doses of IVB, visual acuity and CMT improved in all three groups, but improvements (both functional and anatomical) in groups 1 and 3 in month 6 were more significant than in group 2 (mean CDVA LogMAR changes: - 0.18 ± 0.03, - 0.14 ± 0.05, and - 0.2 ± 0.06; mean CMT reductions: - 82.24 ± 11.43, - 66.62 ± 14.34, and - 86.14 ± 18.36, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean number of IVB injections during follow-up was 5.33 (range 4-7), which did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Correction of vitamin D deficiency in DME patients with type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency, in addition to IVB injections, may play a role in improving CDVA and CMT. However, this beneficial effect seems to be delayed by several months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20200407046978N1, registered on April 11, 2020, retrospectively registered ( https://en.irct.ir/trial/46999 ).

Efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements with resveratrol in diabetic macular edema: Long-term results of a comparative study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the adjunct efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements, including resveratrol, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: Participants in this prospective study were 45 patients with DME, who were treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (n = 23, Group I) or with combination of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and vitamin supplements, including resveratrol (n = 22, Group II). All patients underwent visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp examination and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at baseline and monthly after the loading phase of three-monthly anti-VEGF injections, following a PRN protocol. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, although the mean change in visual acuity did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.183). Accordingly, there was a statistically significant decrease in central retinal thickness in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, while the mean difference in central retinal thickness was significantly greater in the "combination" group. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was less in Group II (6.45 ± 1.12 in Group II vs. 7.39 ± 1.31 in Group I, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin supplements with resveratrol was found to be an effective adjunct to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME, offering better anatomic restoration with less injections at the 12-month follow-up.

Extension study of the safety and efficacy of CLS-TA for treatment of macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis (MAGNOLIA).

PURPOSE: To assess the extended efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension (CLS-TA) among patients with macular oedema (ME) secondary to non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: Patients with uveitic ME were treated with suprachoroidal CLS-TA at baseline and week 12 of the Efficacy and Safety of Suprachoroidal CLS-TA for Macular Edema Secondary to Noninfectious Uveitis: Phase 3 Randomized Trial (PEACHTREE) study. Time to rescue was evaluated over 24 additional weeks for MAGNOLIA. Safety data, visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness (CST) reduction were also evaluated. Of the 53 eligible patients (46 CLS-TA and 7 control), 33 patients were enrolled (28 CLS-TA and 5 control). RESULTS: Over the entire 48-week period for PEACHTREE and MAGNOLIA, the median time to rescue therapy was 257 days versus 55.5 days for the CLS-TA and sham-control arms, respectively. Of 28 CLS-TA treated patients who participated in MAGNOLIA, 14 (50%) did not require rescue therapy through approximately 9 months after the second treatment. Among CLS-TA patients not requiring rescue, there was a mean gain of 12.1 letters and mean CST reduction of 174.5 µm at week 48. No serious adverse events related to study treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of patients did not require additional treatment for up to 9 months following the last CLS-TA administration.

PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM-INDUCED PIGMENTARY MACULOPATHY WITH NONLEAKING CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

PURPOSE: To report a case of nonleaking cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS)-induced pigmentary maculopathy. METHODS: Multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography, fundus photography, autofluorescence, and fluorescein angiography, was used to substantiate our diagnosis, further characterize the cystoid macular edema showed by our patient and to monitor the response to treatment. RESULTS: A 59-year-old woman was referred for decreased visual acuity and bilateral macular edema. She had been treated for interstitial cystitis with PPS for 10 years. Multimodal imaging showed the characteristic features of PPS-induced pigmentary maculopathy. Moreover, fluorescein angiogram showed nonleaking cystoid macular edema in both eyes. She was treated successfully with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this report is the first to demonstrate that PPS-associated cystoid macular edema can be nonleaking on fluorescein angiography and responds well to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.

Diabetic macular edema.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness world-wide. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of moderate vision loss in patients with diabetes. Although treatments for DME have improved significantly over the past decades, the burden of this disease remains high for patients and the healthcare system alike. The role of the primary care provider is critical in the prevention and prompt referral for management of DME.

Biologic Therapy and Treatment Options in Diabetic Retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema can be a potentially sightthreatening disease if not treated correctly. It is directly correlated to the duration of diabetes and how well managed the patients' diabetes is. In the last 15 years, the treatment of diabetic eye disease has taken a quantum leap in methodology due to the group of biological agents named antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). The introduction of the first biological agent has revolutionized the treatment, not only in diabetic eye disease but also across most inflammatory eye diseases, causing leakage of fluid from the blood vessels i.e., in age-related macular degeneration. The availability of these biological agents, despite their considerable costs, have significantly improved the outcomes measured in visual acuity compared to more traditional treatments of diabetic retinopathy in the form of sole laser treatment and glycemic control. The agents demonstrate a favorable safety profile, but if the rarest and most severe side effects occur, there is a potential total loss of vision. This review aims to make an overview of the current pharmaceutical therapeutic options in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. This includes laser therapy, intravitreal steroids, and a primary focus on intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factors.

Long-term effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on visual acuity and retinopathy.

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is an adjunct treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Since plausible mechanisms of action for this treatment include increased angiogenesis and high tissue oxygen concentrations, concerns about deterioration of retinopathy have been raised. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HBO2 on visual acuity (VA) and retinopathy in patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers during a two-year follow-up period. This is a randomized, single-center, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of HBO2 in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic foot ulcers. All study participants underwent an ophthalmological examination before the first study treatment and then at three, six, 12 and 24 months. Fifty patients with a median age of 67 years were included. Visual acuity was similar between groups and did not change during the two-year observation period. No differences in retinopathy were seen between groups; neither were any differences found in numbers or areas of bleedings, hard exudates, microaneurysms or edemas, nor between groups or visits. New clinically significant macular edema was identified in four eyes in the HBO2 group and in three eyes in the placebo group. In this population of diabetic foot ulcer patients HBO2 seems to be neutral in an ophthalmological perspective. From a retinal point of view, we could not identify any indication of harmful effects of HBO2 on the microvascular bed in the placebo group.

The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on diabetic retinopathy: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on diabetic retinopathy lesions and macular edema in patients undergoing the treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: We compared two groups: a first group including 25 patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated by HBOT for foot ulcers, and a second group (control group) composed of 25 patients with diabetic retinopathy who did not receive HBOT. The HBOT protocol performed for the patients in the first group was: 30 sessions of 90 minutes each at 2.5 ATA with a mean frequency of five sessions per week. All patients had an ophthalmological exam at baseline (visual acuity, intraocular pressure, fundus exam), fundus photography and an OCT exam. A follow-up exam was performed at the conclusion of the HBOT. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, patients treated with HBOT showed a regression or stabilization of diabetic retinopathy lesions and a decrease in central macular thickness (CMT). CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may improve diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. This therapy may serve as an adjunctive treatment in the management of retinal ischemia and capillary hyperpermeability in diabetic retinopathy.

THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES IN A RANDOMIZED SINGLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL OF INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB AND ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION WITH DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID AND ANTIOXIDANTS FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.

PURPOSE: To report 3-year results of a randomized single-blind controlled trial of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with oral docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation versus ranibizumab alone in patients with diabetic macular edema. METHODS: There were 26 patients (31 eyes) in the DHA group and 29 (38 eyes) in the control group. Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) was administered monthly for the first 4 months followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. In the experimental group, patients received oral DHA supplementation (1,050 mg/day) (Brudyretina 1.5 g). RESULTS: At 36 months, mean decrease of central subfield macular thickness was higher in the DHA-supplementation group than in controls (275 ± 50 µm vs. 310 ± 97 µm) with significant differences at Months 25, 30, 33, and 34. Between-group differences in best-corrected visual acuity were not found, but the percentages of ETRDS gains >5 and >10 letters were higher in the DHA-supplementation group. Differences serum HbA1c, plasma total antioxidant capacity values, erythrocyte DHA content, and serum IL-6 levels were all significant in favor of the DHA-supplementation group. CONCLUSION: The addition of a high-rich DHA dietary supplement to intravitreal ranibizumab was effective to achieve better sustained improvement of central subfield macular thickness outcomes after 3 years of follow-up as compared with intravitreal ranibizumab alone.

Actualización sobre el manejo del tumor vasoproliferativo / Update on the management of vasoproliferative tumour

CASO CLÍNICO: Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 19 años con un tumor vasoproliferativo, en cuya evolución presentó una membrana epirretiniana, edema macular, hemovítreo y desprendimiento de retina exudativo. Se trató con 3 inyecciones intravítreas de bevacizumab, implante intravítreo de dexametasona, tocilizumab y 2 sesiones de crioterapia. DISCUSIÓN: Las opciones terapéuticas son: observación en los de menor tamaño, periféricos y sin amenaza para la visión. Si se necesita tratamiento, fotocoagulación con láser, crioterapia transconjuntival, inyecciones intravítreas de bevacizumab, termoterapia transpupilar, terapia fotodinámica, placas de radioterapia y cirugía son diferentes opciones disponibles. Recientemente se ha descrito que el tocilizumab y los implantes intravítreos de dexametasona pueden ser beneficiosos

CASE REPORT: Here we report a 19-year-old female patient who presented a vasoproliferative tumour. It caused complications, such as epiretinal membrane, macular oedema, vitreous haemorrhage, and exudative retinal detachment. The patient was treated with 3 injections of intravitreal bevacizumab, an intravitreal dexamethasone implant, tocilizumab, and double freeze-thaw cryotherapy. DISCUSSION: Therapeutic options are: observation, if it is small, if it is a peripheral lesion, and if there seems to be no threat to vision. If it requires treatment, laser photocoagulation, intravitreal bevacizumab, trans-conjunctival cryotherapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy plaques and surgery are the different options available. Recently, tocilizumab and intravitreal dexamethasone implants have been reported to be beneficial

[Recommendations for the use of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema at IMSS]. / Recomendaciones para el uso de ranibizumab en edema macular diabético en el IMSS.

Diabetic macular edema can occur at any stage of diabetic retinopathy. It represents the main cause of vision loss in diabetes type I and II with a prevalence of 3-10% in diabetic patients of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Our aim is to elaborate treatment guidelines and provide recommendations for the use of intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic medical edema at IMSS. Nine retina specialists and 10 ophthalmologists from IMSS high specialty medical units gathered to discuss the bibliographic evidence for the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab for this disease, in order to create consensus on its use in the institution. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection should be used on patients presenting diffuse or cystic diabetic macular edema who have strict metabolic control and visual acuity between 20/30 and 20/200 ETDRS, as well as structural features, such as inferior foveal limit of 280 µm and ischemic areas no larger than 50% of the central foveal area. Treatment regime should consist of a loading charge of three monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg, followed by monthly follow-ups and treatment as needed according to anatomic and functional criteria. This consensus decision-making process on the criteria to treat and re-treat patients with this drug will result in better health outcomes than those currently observed among patients with diabetic macular edema at IMSS.

El edema macular diabético se presenta en cualquier etapa de la retinopatía diabética y representa la principal causa de pérdida de visión en las diabetes tipo I y II, con una prevalencia que va del 3 al 10% en pacientes diabéticos del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). El objetivo de este trabajo es elaborar una guía de tratamiento y recomendaciones para el uso de ranibizumab intravítreo en pacientes con edema macular diabético en el IMSS. Se llevó a cabo una reunión de expertos (9 retinólogos y 10 oftalmólogos) de las unidades médicas de alta especialidad del IMSS para realizar una revisión crítica de la eficacia y seguridad del ranibizumab para esta enfermedad y llegar a un consenso sobre el uso de este antiangiogénico en la institución. Las inyecciones de ranibizumab intravítreo se aplicarían a pacientes con edema macular diabético del tipo difuso o quístico, con un control metabólico estricto, agudeza visual en un rango de 20/30 a 20/200 ETDRS y criterios estructurales, como el límite foveal inferior a 280 µm y zonas isquémicas de no más del 50% de la zona central foveal. El esquema de tratamiento consistiría en una dosis de carga de tres inyecciones mensuales de ranibizumab de 0.5 mg y posteriormente seguimiento mensual y tratamiento por razón necesaria según criterios anatómicos y funcionales. El consenso sobre los criterios de tratamiento y retratamiento con este medicamento garantizará mejores resultados clínicos en pacientes con edema macular diabético en el IMSS.

COMBINED INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB AND ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION WITH DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID AND ANTIOXIDANTS FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Two-Year Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial Results.

PURPOSE: To assess the 2-year effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with a dietary supplement rich in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) plus antioxidants in 62 patients with diabetic macular edema. METHODS: In a randomized single-blind controlled study, 33 subjects (42 eyes) received intravitreal ranibizumab alone and 29 (34 eyes) combined with DHA (1,050 mg/day). Monthly ranibizumab (0.5 mg) was given for the first 4 months followed by on as-needed treatment. RESULTS: At 24 months, the difference between groups in the decrease of central subfield macular thickness was significant in favor of the DHA supplementation group (95% confidence interval of the difference 7.20-97.656; P = 0.024), although improvement in best-corrected visual acuity measured in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters did not reach statistical significance (95% confidence interval 5.4-11.2, P < 0.66). At 24 months, gains of >5 and >10 letters were significantly higher in the DHA supplementation group as compared with controls when the worse and better seeing eyes were considered but other differences at 12 months and 24 months were not found. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal ranibizumab combined with DHA supplementation reduced central subfield macular thickness after 2 years of follow-up as compared with ranibizumab alone in patients with diabetic macular edema. This anatomical improvement was accompanied by a trend for an amelioration of vision.

Retinitis pigmentosa-associated cystoid macular oedema: pathogenesis and avenues of intervention.

Hereditary retinal diseases are now the leading cause of blindness certification in the working age population (age 16-64 years) in England and Wales, of which retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common disorder. RP may be complicated by cystoid macular oedema (CMO), causing a reduction of central vision. The underlying pathogenesis of RP-associated CMO (RP-CMO) remains uncertain, however, several mechanisms have been proposed, including: (1) breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, (2) failure (or dysfunction) of the pumping mechanism in the retinal pigment epithelial, (3) Müller cell oedema and dysfunction, (4) antiretinal antibodies and (5) vitreous traction. There are limited data on efficacy of treatments for RP-CMO. Treatments attempted to date include oral and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, oral, topical, intravitreal and periocular steroids, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, photocoagulation, vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peel, oral lutein and intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections. This review summarises the evidence supporting these treatment modalities. Successful management of RP-CMO should aim to improve both quality and quantity of vision in the short term and may also slow central vision loss over time.

Quantitative Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Fluocinolone Acetonide Vitreous Implants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glaucomatous changes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal implants releasing 0.2 µg/day or 0.5 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) (Iluvien 0.2 µg/day; Alimera Sciences, Alpharetta, GA) or sham control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fundus photographs were assessed to determine clinically significant changes in glaucomatous indicators. RESULTS: The mean cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) change was similar with all three treatments. Compared with sham control, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with 0.5 µg/day but not 0.2 µg/day FAc experienced a CDR increase of greater than 0.1. There was no significant increase in the proportion of patients experiencing a CDR increase of greater than 0.2 with either dose of implant versus sham control. Other indicators of glaucomatous change did not differ significantly with treatment. Subgroup analyses showed no differences in cupping based on ocular or baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: Treatment with FAc for 36 months was not associated with significant glaucomatous optic nerve head changes in patients with DME with or without increased intraocular pressure. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:418-425.].

A multicentre phase III randomised controlled single-masked clinical trial evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of light-masks at preventing dark-adaptation in the treatment of early diabetic macular oedema (CLEOPATRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study will evaluate hypoxia, as a novel concept in the pathogenesis of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). As the oxygen demand of the eye is maximum during dark-adaptation, we hypothesize that wearing light-masks during sleep will cause regression and prevent the development and progression of DMO. The study protocol comprises both an efficacy and mechanistic evaluation to test this hypothesis. METHOD/DESIGN: This is a phase III randomised controlled single-masked multicentre clinical trial to test the clinical efficacy of light-masks at preventing dark-adaptation in the treatment of non-central DMO. Three hundred patients with non-centre-involving DMO in at least one eye will be randomised 1:1 to light-masks and control masks (with no light) to be used during sleep at night for a period of 24 months. The primary outcome is regression of non-central oedema by assessing change in the zone of maximal retinal thickness at baseline on optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes will evaluate the prevention of development and progression of DMO by assessing changes in retinal thickness in different regions of the macula, macular volume, refracted visual acuity and level of retinopathy. Safety parameters will include sleep disturbance. Adverse events and measures of compliance will be assessed over 24 months. Participants recruited to the mechanistic sub-study will have additional retinal oximetry, multifocal electroretinography (ERG) and microperimetry to evaluate the role of hypoxia by assessing and comparing changes induced by supplemental oxygen and the light-masks at 12 months. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study will provide insight into the pathogenesis of DMO and provide evidence on whether a simple, non-invasive device in the form of a light-mask can help prevent the progression to centre-involving DMO and visual impairment in people with diabetes.

Optical coherence tomography and histopathology of macular uveitis.

PURPOSE: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is a noninvasive technique that can provide high-resolution images of macular morphology. The purpose of this study was to examine the pathological mechanism of uveitis and compare the changes in the macula of uveitis patients and the histopathological features of experimentally induced uveitis in mice. METHODS: Macular OCT was performed on 78 eyes of 51 patients of the Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China, with apparent uveitis changes. C57BL/6 mice were injected with interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP)-specific T cells from naïve mice immunized with complete Freund adjuvant IRBP(1-20) to induce uveitis. The disease was monitored by indirect fundoscopy. The eyes of the mice with experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) were enucleated 18 days after injection and classified according to pathological characteristics. RESULTS: The characteristics of uveitis were classified into six categories. Macular edema was detected in 48 eyes (61.5%); macular epiretinal membrane in 22 eyes (28.2%); choroidal neovascularization and macular lamellar holes in 4 eyes (5.1%), respectively; macular atrophy in 10 eyes (12.8%); and serous neuroepithelium detachment in 22 eyes (28.2%). As in human patients, pathological examinations of mouse EAU showed inflammation, folds, and atrophy of the outer part of the neuroretina, choroidal neovascularization with hemorrhagic retinal detachment, serous neuroepithelium detachment, and epiretinal membrane formation. CONCLUSIONS: Macular OCT of uveitis patients can display different morphological characteristics. Mouse EAU can simulate human uveitis. The comparative analysis of macular OCT in human uveitis and transfer EAU histopathology changes could provide important information on the pathogenesis of human uveitis.