Therapeutic Efficacy of Intravitreal Conbercept Injections with or without Focal Macular Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal conbercept injections with or without focal macular photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective study included 60 DME patients (60 eyes) divided into two treatment groups. The conbercept group received monthly intravitreal injections for 5 consecutive sessions, while the combination therapy group received intravitreal injections and focal macular photocoagulation. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were observed before and at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 after treatment in both groups, along with the number of intravitreal conbercept injections administered. Results: At 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment, both the conbercept and combined treatment groups showed improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) compared to before treatment, with statistical significant differences (P < .05). However, the differences in BCVA and CMT between the two groups at each time point after treatment were not significant (P > .05). During the 1-year follow-up period, the mean number of injections in the combined treatment group was 6.3±0.8, which was less than that in the conbercept treatment group (7.6 ± 0.9), with a significant difference (t = 5.556, P < .001). The incidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage was 10.9% and 10.5% in the two groups, respectively, with no significant inter-group difference (χ² = 0.013, P = .908). None of the patients exhibited serious treatment-related ocular and systemic complications during the treatment period. Conclusions: Treatment of DME with intravitreal conbercept injections, whether with or without focal macular photocoagulation, is safe and effective in improving the patients' visual acuity and retinal anatomy. However, patients who receive combined treatment require fewer intravitreal injections than those who receive conbercept treatment alone.

MACULAR SENSITIVITY CHANGE AFTER COMPLEMENTARY LASER THERAPY AFTER RANIBIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION IN BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.

PURPOSE: We examined the effect of ranibizumab with or without laser photocoagulation on retinal sensitivity in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Prospective randomized control study. Thirty patients with branch retinal vein occlusion received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in a monthly pro re nata regimen. Fifteen patients received ranibizumab monotherapy alone (monotherapy group). The remaining 15 patients received rescue laser therapy at 3 or 9 months (combined group). The retinal sensitivity was measured at 32 points within central 8°, and the average of the main occlusion side among the 16 upper or 16 lower points was defined as the affected area sensitivity. RESULTS: In comparing the monotherapy group and the combined group, the number of injections during the 12 months was 5.4 versus 4.9, the change in retinal thickness ( µ m) was -254 versus -197, the ETDRS letters of improvement was +18.3 versus +19.6, and the change in the affected area sensitivity (dB) was +7.1 versus +4.6. At 12 months, all these results were significantly improved compared with their respective baselines, but none of the differences between the two groups reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Retinal sensitivity at 12 months improved in both the monotherapy group and the combined group. The additional laser did not reduce the number of injections or further improve visual acuity nor did it affect retinal sensitivity.

Onion ring sign on spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diabetic macular edema: Its evolution and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report evolution and outcomes of hyperreflective crystalline deposit (HCD) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in diabetic maculopathy (DM). METHODS: Patients with DM showing HCD on OCT for the first time between June 2017 and May 2021 were included in the study. Demographic, ophthalmic and OCT features were documented and analysed. Factors leading to the development of HCD and its effect on the functional outcome were analysed and described in this study. RESULTS: Sixty cases of HCD were identified in 45 (males -33; females - 12) patients for the first-time during the defined study period. Mean age of the eligible patients was 61.53 ± 8.19 years. Average duration of diabetes was 13.82 ± 7.38 years. Mean visual acuity of these patients was 0.902 ± 0.438 logMAR units (Snellen equivalent = 20/160). Patients with HCD showed subretinal hard exudates, were on anti-cholesterol medications (n = 36, 80%) and showed reduced visual acuity (20/160) if the HCD involved the fovea. The median time taken for the development of HCD was 28 months. Mean follow-up duration of the study was 26.19 ± 27.98 months. Persistence of HCD in all cases (n = 42, 100%) was noted at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION: Horizontal, single or multi-layered HCDs on OCT in DM represent intraretinal or subretinal cholesterol crystal precipitates evolving from the hard exudates identical to the "onion ring sign" seen in neovascular AMD. HCDs or CCs depict deranged lipid metabolism, chronic vascular leakage and can lead to substantial visual impairment if the fovea gets involved.

Patients views on a new surveillance pathway involving allied non-medical staff for people with treated diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To explore acceptability by patients and health care professionals of a new surveillance pathway for people with previously treated and stable diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). SUBJECT/METHODS: Structured discussions in 10 focus groups with patients; two with ophthalmic photographers/graders, and one with ophthalmologists, held across the UK as part of a large diagnostic accuracy study (EMERALD). RESULTS: The most prominent issues raised by patients concerned (i) expertise of the various professionals within clinic, (ii) quality of interactions with clinic professionals, especially the flow of information from professionals to patients, and (iii) wish to be treated holistically. Ophthalmologists suggested such issues could be best dealt with via a programme of patient education and tended to overlook deeper implications of patient concerns for the organisation of services. CONCLUSION: For patients, the clinical service should not only include the identification and treatment of disease but also exchange of information, reassurance, and mitigation of anxiety. Alterations in the standard care pathway need to take account of such concerns and their implications, in addition to any assessments of 'efficiency' that may flow from changes in diagnostic technology, or the division of professional labour.

Persistent diabetic macular edema: Definition, incidence, biomarkers, and treatment methods.

Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment has drastically improved the visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME); however, success is not always guaranteed, and a proportion of these eyes demonstrate persistent DME (pDME) despite intensive treatment. While standardized criteria to define these treatment-resistant eyes have not yet been established, many studies refer to eyes with no clinical response or an unsatisfactory partial response as having pDME. A patient is considered to have pDME if the retinal thickness improves less than 10-25% after 6 months of treatment. A range of treatment options have been recommended for eyes with pDME, including switching anti-VEGF agents, using corticosteroids and/or antioxidant drugs in adjunct with anti-VEGF therapy, and vitrectomy. In addition, multimodal imaging of DME eyes may be advantageous in predicting the responsiveness to treatment; this is beneficial when initiating alternative therapies. We explore the literature on persistent DME regarding its defining criteria, incidence, the baseline biological markers that may be useful in anticipating the response to treatment, and the available treatment options.

Unusual Presentation of Acute Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To report a rare case of cystoid macular edema (CME) as a presentation of acute hydroxychloroquine-related retinal toxicity. OBSERVATIONS: A 37-year-old female patient visited our ophthalmology department in October 2019 complaining of bilateral blurred vision and metamorphopsia for 3 days. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/7.5 in the left eye under the Snellen E chart. Before presentation, she had taken hydroxychloroquine as a "reproduction-facilitating medication" prior to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures with the daily dose of 200 mg for 1 week in March 2019 and 400 mg for 1 month in September 2019. She also took a combination of several herbal medicine including "Angelica sinensis" for 6 months in this period. On examination, typical signs of hydroxychloroquine maculopathy such as bilateral paracentral retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change in blue autofluorescence and loss of the paracentral ellipsoid zone in optical coherence tomography ("flying saucer sign") were noted. CME was also found in fluorescein angiography. Her symptoms improved gradually after cessation of hydroxychloroquine and herb medicine without any further treatment. Resolution of bilateral CME was revealed at 16 weeks with final bilateral BCVA 6/6. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Although rare, acute hydroxychloroquine maculopathy could occur in patients with concomitant usage of medications that could interfere with P450 enzymes system. Careful acquisition of drug history and serial ophthalmological examinations are advised in using hydroxychloroquine for disease management even for a short period of time.

Central Retinal Vein Occlusion After Discontinuation of Rivaroxaban Therapy in a Young Patient with COVID-19 Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND We present the report of the first case, to the best of our knowledge, of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) that occurred 3 days after anticoagulation discontinuation in a patient with a history of pulmonary embolism in the course of COVID-19. CASE REPORT A previously healthy 38-year-old man was hospitalized in April 2021 with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, complicated by segmental and subsegmental pulmonary embolism. The patient was treated with a concurrent combination of remdesivir, dexamethasone, therapeutic enoxaparin, ceftriaxone, passive oxygen therapy, and convalescent plasma therapy, which led to pulmonary improvement. The treatment with therapeutic enoxaparin (80 mg/0.8 mL twice a day) was continued for 1 month after discharge, followed by 15 mg of rivaroxaban twice a day for 3 weeks and 20 mg of rivaroxaban once a day for 11 weeks. Within 3 days after rivaroxaban discontinuation, the patient experienced a decrease in visual acuity in his right eye, to the level of 5/25. Nonischemic CRVO with cystoid macular edema was diagnosed and an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was performed. Common identifiable factors contributing to CRVO were excluded, and the treatment with prophylactic enoxaparin was initiated. Two weeks later, macular edema decreased significantly and visual acuity improved to 20/20. The treatment with enoxaparin was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS Rebound hypercoagulability after discontinuation of rivaroxaban therapy can manifest as CRVO in a young patient with a history of COVID-19 pulmonary embolism. It was successfully treated with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.

Analysis of Drug Clinical Trials for Eye Diseases in China.

Purpose: We systematically retrospected and analyzed the general characteristics of ophthalmic drug clinical trials (CTs) registered in China from January 2014 to December 2021. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Drug Trial Registration and Information Publication Platform and then standardized and statistically classified using bibliometric analysis. Results: We identified 201 drug CTs for eye diseases, including 24 international multicenter trials. The number of drug CTs for eye diseases has considerably increased since 2017 in parallel with new policies to encourage innovation in drugs and medical devices in China. The drug types consist of biologicals (48.26%), chemicals (45.77%), and traditional Chinese medicine/natural medicines (5.97%). The main indications were age-related macular degeneration (AMD; n = 47, 23.38%), macular edema (n = 32, 15.92%), and diabetic retinopathy (n = 19, 9.45%). The trials included those in phase I (n = 67, 33.33%), phase II (n = 33, 16.42%), and phase III (n = 72, 35.82%). The phase I trials comprised 24 innovative drug treatments for AMD and 6 novel drug treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, with 39 biologicals and 27 chemicals. The trials mostly followed a randomized (84.08%) or masked (67.16%) design, with 90.37% of the latter being double-masked trials. Conclusion: Research and development of ophthalmic drugs have substantially increased in recent years and are influenced by regulatory policies. Among these drugs, biologicals for AMD are the most prevalent, followed by biologicals for macular edema. Randomized double-masked research designs are often used and represent high-quality evidence.

Evaluation of the Effect of Garlic Tablet as a Complementary Treatment for Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of garlic (Allium sativum L.) tablets as a complimentary herbal medication in diabetic macular edema. Methods: A total of 91 diabetic participants (117 eyes) with central involved macular edema underwent a double-blind randomized trial. The patients used garlic tablets (500 mg) (2 tab/day) or placebo for 4 weeks and subsequently were examined by an expert ophthalmologist. Clinical manifestations including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured as the main outcomes. Results: BCVA was significantly improved by a 0.18 decrease in mean logMAR value in the garlic-treated patients in comparison with 0.06 in the control ones (P value = 0.027). CMT was decreased in both groups by a 102.99 µm decrease in the garlic group compared to 52.67 µm in the placebo group, albeit in a nonsignificant manner (P value: 0.094). IOP was decreased in the garlic group by 1.03 mmHg (P value: 0.024) and increased by 0.3 mmHg (P value: 0.468) in the placebo group. Conclusion: Our trial suggests that garlic supplements can improve visual acuity, decrease the CMT and lower the IOP, and can be considered as an adjuvant treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema. Garlic was satisfactorily tolerated in diabetic patients, and no significant adverse effect interrupting the safety profile was observed.

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome of treatment with bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Concomitant vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is speculated to aggravate diabetic macular edema (DME). We aimed to determine the effect of hypovitaminosis D correction on the outcome of treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in DME eyes. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 83 eyes of 83 patients with DME were recruited and divided into three groups: normal vitamin D levels + IVB administration (Group 1), vitamin D insufficient/deficient + IVB administration (Group 2), and vitamin D insufficient/deficient + IVB administration + oral vitamin D supplementation (Group 3). Participants were followed for 6 months after the intervention. Visual (corrected distance visual acuity, CDVA) and anatomical (central macular thickness, CMT) outcomes of intervention were evaluated 1, 3, and 6 months after three monthly loading doses of IVB were given. Serum vitamin D levels were measured 1 and 6 months after the third IVB administration. RESULTS: A total of 29, 26, and 28 eyes were enrolled in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In months 1, 3, and 6, after the three basic loading doses of IVB, visual acuity and CMT improved in all three groups, but improvements (both functional and anatomical) in groups 1 and 3 in month 6 were more significant than in group 2 (mean CDVA LogMAR changes: - 0.18 ± 0.03, - 0.14 ± 0.05, and - 0.2 ± 0.06; mean CMT reductions: - 82.24 ± 11.43, - 66.62 ± 14.34, and - 86.14 ± 18.36, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean number of IVB injections during follow-up was 5.33 (range 4-7), which did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Correction of vitamin D deficiency in DME patients with type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency, in addition to IVB injections, may play a role in improving CDVA and CMT. However, this beneficial effect seems to be delayed by several months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20200407046978N1, registered on April 11, 2020, retrospectively registered ( https://en.irct.ir/trial/46999 ).

Effect of a Fixed Combination of Curcumin, Artemisia, Bromelain, and Black Pepper Oral Administration on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Indices in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Background: To investigate the effects of a fixed combination of Curcumin (200 mg), Artemisia (80 mg), Bromelain (80 mg), and Black pepper (2 mg) on vascular parameters in mild to moderate diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Prospective, case-control study. Methods: Fifty-six patients affected by diabetes mellitus type II were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight patients with DME received 2 tablets/day, before meals of a dietary complementary supplement containing in fixed combination Curcumin (200 mg), Artemisia (80 mg), Bromelain (80 mg), and Black pepper (2 mg) (Intravit®, OFFHEALTH Spa, Firenze, Italy) for 6 months. Twenty-eight age-matched subjects affected by diabetes mellitus type II were given placebo and served as control group. Patients underwent best correct visual acuity (BCVA), swept optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT-Angiography (OCTA). OCTA images of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) were obtained for each eye. By the end of the follow-up patients were defined responder to the therapy when a decrease of more than 30 µm was registered in central retinal thickness (CRT) measurement, while a poor responder was determined by the absence of reduction or an increase in central retinal thickness at 6 months. We assessed the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel density and quantified the number of microaneurysms in each layer. Results: A significant improvement of BCVA and CRT reduction was recorded at 6 months follow-up in the dietary complementary supplementation group compared to control (respectively p = 0.028 and p = 0.0003). VD of the total capillary plexus, microaneurysms count, glycaemia and HbA1c did not vary over the follow-up period between groups. Within the Intravit® group, poor responders tended to show a larger FAZ area, more microaneurysms, and a lower VD in the DCP compared to the good responders group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: A fixed combination of Curcumin, Artemisia, Bromelain, and Black pepper oral administration may have a positive impact on central retinal thickness, visual acuity, and VD of the DCP in compensated type 2 diabetic patients with mild DME.

Extension study of the safety and efficacy of CLS-TA for treatment of macular oedema associated with non-infectious uveitis (MAGNOLIA).

PURPOSE: To assess the extended efficacy and safety of suprachoroidal triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension (CLS-TA) among patients with macular oedema (ME) secondary to non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: Patients with uveitic ME were treated with suprachoroidal CLS-TA at baseline and week 12 of the Efficacy and Safety of Suprachoroidal CLS-TA for Macular Edema Secondary to Noninfectious Uveitis: Phase 3 Randomized Trial (PEACHTREE) study. Time to rescue was evaluated over 24 additional weeks for MAGNOLIA. Safety data, visual acuity and retinal central subfield thickness (CST) reduction were also evaluated. Of the 53 eligible patients (46 CLS-TA and 7 control), 33 patients were enrolled (28 CLS-TA and 5 control). RESULTS: Over the entire 48-week period for PEACHTREE and MAGNOLIA, the median time to rescue therapy was 257 days versus 55.5 days for the CLS-TA and sham-control arms, respectively. Of 28 CLS-TA treated patients who participated in MAGNOLIA, 14 (50%) did not require rescue therapy through approximately 9 months after the second treatment. Among CLS-TA patients not requiring rescue, there was a mean gain of 12.1 letters and mean CST reduction of 174.5 µm at week 48. No serious adverse events related to study treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of patients did not require additional treatment for up to 9 months following the last CLS-TA administration.

A Randomized Trial of Photobiomodulation Therapy for Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema with Good Visual Acuity (Protocol AE).

PURPOSE: To determine if treatment with a photobiomodulation (PBM) device results in greater improvement in central subfield thickness (CST) than placebo in eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and good vision. DESIGN: Phase 2 randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had CI-DME and visual acuity (VA) 20/25 or better in the study eye and were recruited from 23 clinical sites in the United States. METHODS: One eye of each participant was randomly assigned 1:1 to a 670-nm light-emitting PBM eye patch or an identical device emitting broad-spectrum white light at low power. Treatment was applied for 90 seconds twice daily for 4 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in CST on spectral-domain OCT at 4 months. RESULTS: From April 2019 to February 2020, 135 adults were randomly assigned to either PBM (n = 69) or placebo (n = 66); median age was 62 years, 37% were women, and 82% were White. The median device compliance was 92% with PBM and 95% with placebo. OCT CST increased from baseline to 4 months by a mean (SD) of 13 (53) µm in PBM eyes and 15 (57) µm in placebo eyes, with the mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) being -2 (-20 to 16) µm (P = 0.84). CI-DME, based on DRCR Retina Network sex- and machine-based thresholds, was present in 61 (90%) PBM eyes and 57 (86%) placebo eyes at 4 months (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.30 (0.44-3.83); P = 0.63). VA decreased by a mean (SD) of -0.2 (5.5) letters and -0.6 (4.6) letters in the PBM and placebo groups, respectively (difference [95% CI] = 0.4 (-1.3 to 2.0) letters; P = 0.64). There were 8 adverse events possibly related to the PBM device and 2 adverse events possibly related to the placebo device. None were serious. CONCLUSIONS: PBM as given in this study, although safe and well-tolerated, was not found to be effective for the treatment of CI-DME in eyes with good vision.

Anti-Diabetic Effects of Isolated Lipids from Natural Sources through Modulation of Angiogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant angiogenesis plays a fateful role in the development of diabetes and diabetic complications. Lipids, as a diverse group of biomacromolecules, are able to relieve diabetes through the modulation of angiogenesis. OBJECTIVES: Owing to the present remarkable anti-diabetic effects with no or few side effects of lipids, the aim of this study was to assess the state-of-the-art research on anti-diabetic effects of lipids via the modulation of angiogenesis. METHODS: To study the effects of lipids in diabetes via modulation of angiogenesis, we have searched the electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane. RESULTS: The promising anti-diabetic effects of lipids were reported in several studies. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from fish oil (FO) were reported to significantly induce neovasculogenesis in high glucose (HG)-mediated endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) with neovasculogenesis dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mice. Linoleic acid, mono-epoxy-tocotrienol- α (MeT3α), and ginsenoside Rg1 facilitate wound closure and vessel formation. N-Palmitoylethanolamine (PEA), α-linolenic acid (ALA), omega-3 (ω3) lipids from flaxseed (FS) oil, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), lipoic acid, taurine, and zeaxanthin (Zx) are effective in diabetic retinopathy via suppression of angiogenesis. Lysophosphatidic acid, alkyl-glycerophosphate, crocin, arjunolic acid, α-lipoic acid, and FS oil are involved in the management of diabetes and its cardiac complications. Furthermore, in two clinical trials, R-(+)-lipoic acid (RLA) in combination with hyperbaric oxygenation therapy (HBOT) for treatment of chronic wound healing in DM patients, as well as supplementation with DHA plus antioxidants along with intravitreal ranibizumab were investigated for its effects on diabetic macular edema. CONCLUSION: Proof-of-concept studies presented here seem to well shed light on the anti-diabetic effects of lipids via modulation of angiogenesis.

PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM-INDUCED PIGMENTARY MACULOPATHY WITH NONLEAKING CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

PURPOSE: To report a case of nonleaking cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS)-induced pigmentary maculopathy. METHODS: Multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography, fundus photography, autofluorescence, and fluorescein angiography, was used to substantiate our diagnosis, further characterize the cystoid macular edema showed by our patient and to monitor the response to treatment. RESULTS: A 59-year-old woman was referred for decreased visual acuity and bilateral macular edema. She had been treated for interstitial cystitis with PPS for 10 years. Multimodal imaging showed the characteristic features of PPS-induced pigmentary maculopathy. Moreover, fluorescein angiogram showed nonleaking cystoid macular edema in both eyes. She was treated successfully with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this report is the first to demonstrate that PPS-associated cystoid macular edema can be nonleaking on fluorescein angiography and responds well to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.

Efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements with resveratrol in diabetic macular edema: Long-term results of a comparative study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the adjunct efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements, including resveratrol, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: Participants in this prospective study were 45 patients with DME, who were treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (n = 23, Group I) or with combination of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and vitamin supplements, including resveratrol (n = 22, Group II). All patients underwent visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp examination and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at baseline and monthly after the loading phase of three-monthly anti-VEGF injections, following a PRN protocol. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, although the mean change in visual acuity did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.183). Accordingly, there was a statistically significant decrease in central retinal thickness in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, while the mean difference in central retinal thickness was significantly greater in the "combination" group. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was less in Group II (6.45 ± 1.12 in Group II vs. 7.39 ± 1.31 in Group I, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin supplements with resveratrol was found to be an effective adjunct to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME, offering better anatomic restoration with less injections at the 12-month follow-up.

Biologic Therapy and Treatment Options in Diabetic Retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema can be a potentially sightthreatening disease if not treated correctly. It is directly correlated to the duration of diabetes and how well managed the patients' diabetes is. In the last 15 years, the treatment of diabetic eye disease has taken a quantum leap in methodology due to the group of biological agents named antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). The introduction of the first biological agent has revolutionized the treatment, not only in diabetic eye disease but also across most inflammatory eye diseases, causing leakage of fluid from the blood vessels i.e., in age-related macular degeneration. The availability of these biological agents, despite their considerable costs, have significantly improved the outcomes measured in visual acuity compared to more traditional treatments of diabetic retinopathy in the form of sole laser treatment and glycemic control. The agents demonstrate a favorable safety profile, but if the rarest and most severe side effects occur, there is a potential total loss of vision. This review aims to make an overview of the current pharmaceutical therapeutic options in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. This includes laser therapy, intravitreal steroids, and a primary focus on intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factors.

Add-on effect of Qiming granule, a Chinese patent medicine, in treating diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qiming granule (QG) on diabetic macular edema (DME). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, qvip and China Biology Medicine Disc were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about participants with a diagnosis of DME were included. Risk of bias assessment was conducted by Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCT. Random-effects model was implemented to pool results. Among 16 included studies, QG combined with conventional treatment was administered 13.5 g daily for a period ranging from 2 to 6 months. Results showed combination therapy was more effective than conventional treatment alone in central macular thickness (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -29.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-39.56 to -19.29), p = .0001), optimum corrected vision (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.962, 95%CI (-1.35 to -0.57), p = .0001) and overall effective rate (RR = 1.25, 95%CI = [1.13 to 1.35], p < .0001). Only three studies reported adverse effects. The quality of evidence is low. Due to a lack of placebo control, the net efficacy of QG is still uncertain. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of QG in DME.

Case Report: Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage after Chiropractic Manipulation of the Neck.

SIGNIFICANCE: The case report highlights the possible complications of undergoing neck manipulation within a critical time period after intravitreal injection. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe a case of traumatic hemorrhagic choroidal detachment after cervical manipulation during a chiropractic treatment session. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old male patient with a history of complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair and recurrent cystoid macular edema presented with decreased vision and sudden pain in the right eye after chiropractic manipulation of the neck, status post-intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, which was performed earlier that day. Vision in the right eye was hand motion and 20/20 in the left eye. IOPs were 8 and 11 mmHg, respectively. Slit lamp examination of the right eye revealed blood-tinged steroid residues in the anterior chamber. There was no view to the posterior pole. Ultrasonography showed a lobulated mass with heterogeneous echogenicity consistent with a large hemorrhagic choroidal detachment. No central kissing was observed. Left eye examination was unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing use of complementary and alternative medicine, a better understanding of potential complications to raise awareness is becoming essential.

Clinical observation of Dan-Hong Hua-Yu oral solution in treating retinal vein occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal vein occlusion refers to diseases with decreased vision, dilated tortuous retinal veins visible on the fundus, and retinal hemorrhage, edema, and osmosis distributed along the vein. There is still no ideal intervention to treat central retinal vein occlusion. This study plan to observe the efficacy of Dan-Hong Hua-Yu oral solution in treating non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion, in order to provide new treatment ideas. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to use random number table method, 64 cases of non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion that meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group. The intervention group will be treated with Dan-Hong Hua-Yu oral solution according to the syndrome differentiation of Traditional Chinese medicine and the patient's fundus condition. Each group will take 4 weeks as a course of treatment and three consecutive courses of treatment without any interval during the course of treatment. Changes of visual acuity, fundus performance, and total clinical symptoms of patients before and after treatment will be observed. DISCUSSION: This study will observe the efficacy of Dan-Hong Hua-Yu oral solution in the treatment of non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion, with a view to providing new treatment ideas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR2000030625, Registered on March 08, 2020.