Documenting risk: A comparison of policy and information pamphlets for using epidural or water in labour.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of Australian women use epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour, and its use is increasing. While epidural analgesia is considered a safe option from an anaesthetic point of view, its use transfers a labouring woman out of the category of 'normal' labour and increases her risk of intervention. Judicious use of epidural may be beneficial in particular situations, but its current common use needs to be assessed more closely. This has not yet been explored in the Australian context. AIM: To examine personal, social, institutional and cultural influences on women in their decision to use epidural analgesia in labour. Examining this one event in depth illuminates other birth practices, which can also be analysed according to how they fit within prevailing cultural beliefs about birth. METHODS: Ethnography, underpinned by a critical medical anthropology methodology. RESULTS: These findings describe the influence of risk culture on labour ward practice; specifically, the policies and practices surrounding the use of epidural analgesia are contrasted with those on the use of water. Engaging with current risk theory, we identify the role of power in conceptualisations of risk, which are commonly perpetuated by authority rather than evidence. CONCLUSIONS: As we move towards a risk-driven society, it is vital to identify both the conception and the consequences of promulgations of risk. The construction of waterbirth as a 'risky' practice had the effect of limiting midwifery practice and women's choices, despite evidence that points to the epidural as the more 'dangerous' option.

[Influences of medical education on first aid and AED knowledge among laypersons]. / Einflüsse medizinischer Aufklärungsarbeit auf Erste-Hilfe- und AED-Kenntnisse in der Allgemeinbevölkerung.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although most laypersons have incomplete knowledge of first aid, the placement of automated external defibrillators (AED) on public places suggests AED application by laypersons. Unfortunately, previous results are disappointing; many people don't even recognize AED. Therefore, most authors suggest to force medical education about sudden cardiac death and AED use among laypersons. We wanted to find out whether intensive medical education can improve the recognition of AED at public places and the attendance to acquire knowledge in first aid. METHODS: In 2001 eight AED were placed in the amusement swimming park "LAGO - die Therme". Contemporaneously, we started public education regarding sudden cardiac death, resuscitation and AED among layperson visiting the LAGO. After 10 years we interviewed the visitors with special regard to their knowledge of first aid and AED use. RESULTS: 531 persons (260 men, age 48,4 ± 21,9 [range 8-95] years) fulfilled the questionnaire. 59 (11,1%) stated heart disorder, 219 (41,2%) at least one cardiovascular risk factor. As ten years ago, knowledge of first-aid (59,1%) and AED use (45,2%) was poor, especially among persons younger than 17 years or older than 67 years. 398 (75%) of the interviewed visitors recognized the installed AED, 511 (96,2%) supported the placement of AED. CONCLUSION: The placement of AED on public places in combination with an intensive medical education results in a high acceptance and recognition of AED. Nevertheless, following our date it seems to be doubtful that this results automatically in a higher attendance to acquire knowledge in first-aid and AED use.

A pediatric diabetes toolbox for creating centres of reference.

INTRODUCTION: ISPAD guidelines recommend age appropriate diabetes education concepts for young patients and their families as well as tools for nutritional management, psychosocial assessment, and psychological advice but their implementation in Europe is presently unknown. METHODS: On the basis of a structured survey among the European SWEET members information on established tools and programs in national languages were analyzed using an extensive literature and desk search. These were differentiated according to five age-groups and five target groups (young people with diabetes, parents, and other close relations, carers in school and nursery, and healthcare professionals). RESULTS: Responses and original tools were received from 11 SWEET countries reflecting the European status in 2011. More or less structured information for parents, close relations, and carers in school or nursery are available in all 11 participating countries. However, only two countries followed the recommendations of having published a structured, curriculum lead, and evaluated program for different age-groups and carers. One of these was evaluated nationwide and funded by the respective National Health Care System after accreditation. In addition a huge variety of creative tools, e.g., booklets, leaflets, games, videos, and material for educating children of different age-groups and their parents are available - but most of them are not linked to a structured education program. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonizing and integrating these materials into quality assured structured holistic national education programs will be an important future task for the ongoing SWEET project. A comprehensive European diabetes educational toolbox is aimed to be published and continuously updated on the SWEET website.

[Validation of patients' knowledge after informed consent prior to coronary angiography]. / Überprüfung des Patientenwissens nach Aufklärung vor invasiver Koronarangiographie.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The informed consent of the patient is required before any medical intervention can be done. The impact of the provided information on the subsequent knowledge of the patient is regularly questioned. In the present investigation we aimed to determine the knowledge of the patients about invasive coronary angiography (CA) after they had been optimally vs. standard vs. not at all informed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 300 consecutive patients who were admitted for planned CA were included. Of these, 150 in-patients were informed by especially trained physicians one day before CA and 50 out-patients were informed by their general practitioner or cardiologist several days before admission. 100 in-patients were included before they were informed. In a standardized interview the predefined knowledge of the patients was assessed by an independent physician before CA in previously informed patients and after hospital admission in non-informed patients. RESULTS: The differences in knowledge between informed in- and out-patients were low. Especially their knowledge about potential complications was not different. Generally, patients could remember less serious complications better than life-threatening ones. Two previously informed patients (1 %) affirmed that they were not informed. The knowledge of non-informed patients was much lower than the knowledge of patients who had been informed. CONCLUSION: The knowledge and remembrance of patients after having detailed information about medical interventions is limited. Optimization of the informative interview did not really improve this knowledge. In contrast to non-informed patients the provided information did, however, increase the knowledge.

Safety of acupuncture: results of a prospective observational study with 229,230 patients and introduction of a medical information and consent form.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety of acupuncture in a large number of patients receiving conventional health care and, based on these results, to develop a new medical consent form for acupuncture. METHODS: The prospective observational study included patients who received acupuncture treatment for chronic osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip, low back pain, neck pain or headache, allergic rhinitis, asthma, or dysmenorrhoea. After treatment, all patients documented adverse events associated with acupuncture (defined as adverse effects). Patients who reported a need for treatment due to an adverse effect completed an additional standardised questionnaire on the most important adverse effect. Based on this data and considering ethical and legal aspects a new consent form was developed. RESULTS: A total of 229,230 patients received on average 10.2 +/- 3.0 acupuncture treatments. Altogether, 19,726 patients (8.6%) reported experiencing at least one adverse effect and 4,963 (2.2%) reported one which required treatment. Common adverse effects were bleedings or haematoma (6.1% of patients, 58% of all adverse effects), pain (1.7%) and vegetative symptoms (0.7%). Two patients experienced a pneumothorax (one needed hospital treatment, the other observation only). The longest duration of a side effect was 180 days (nerve lesion of the lower limb). The resulting medical consent form consists of five modules: Introduction to acupuncture and moxibustion, Risks of acupuncture treatment, Conditions which can increase the risk, Doctor's statement, and Consent. CONCLUSION: Acupuncture provided by physicians is a relatively safe treatment and the proposed consent form could support both patients and professionals in the process of obtaining informed consent.

[Knowledge and preferences of the patients about medical information: a study on 700 patients in a regional comprehensive cancer centre]. / Connaissances et préférences des patients sur le droit à l'information médicale: enquête auprès de 700 patients dans un centre régional de lutte contre le cancer.

Information is an important part of the patient care in oncology. The role and objectives of patient information were determined by a law passed in March 2002. This study investigates the knowledge of the patients about their rights and their views on what they consider most important. Information about health status and treatments is considered a priority (92.8% of respondents). The majority of patients whish to be given every information about their disease and treatments. On the contrary only 6.7% would rather receive less precise information tailored to what they want to know. Keeping control on the communication of their health information to relatives and other doctors is the option preferred by the majority of patients. Fifty two per cent of the persons are reluctant to be given medical information on the telephone. However opinions differ among social classes since 62% of patients from the upper classes consider it positively. This study demonstrates that the 2002 law is, in its broad outlines, a good response to patient's information needs.

Does a doctor have a duty to provide information and advice about complementary and alternative medicine?

It is argued that a doctor has a duty to provide information about reasonably available complementary and alternative medicine treatments where that information would be material to the particular patient or the hypothetical prudent patient. Given the vast array of such treatments available, doctors will want to rely on evidence-based medicine problem-solving skills to ascertain those treatments that are safe and efficacious. While the risk of litigation for failure to provide such information is probably low at this time, given the high rate of patient self-prescribing, it is necessary for a doctor to open a dialogue with a patient about complementary and alternative medicine to address safety concerns. In addition, it is important to facilitate access to the best of conventional and complementary treatments to ensure better health outcomes for the patient.

Obligation to advise of options for treatment--medical doctors and complementary and alternative medicine practitioners.

An important aspect of health professional's duty of care is to advise patients of the available options of treatment so that the patient can choose the form of treatment that suits her or his requirements. As CAM becomes more evidence-based and accepted, medical doctors need to consider the extent to which they should provide patients with information about those types of treatments. If a CAM treatment option is evidence-based, there is a strong argument that medical doctors should advise of this option for treatment to satisfy their duty. CAM practitioners should also provide details of options for treatment within their own modality but are not obliged to advise of medical options.