Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(7): 414-418, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593558

RESUMO

: The 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis recommend the use of a multidisciplinary team in the care of patients with infective endocarditis. A standardized collaborative approach should be implemented in centres with immediate access to different imaging techniques, cardiac surgery and health professionals from several specialties. This position paper has been produced by the Task Force for Management of Infective Endocarditis of Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) with the aim of providing recommendations for the implementation of the Endocarditis Team within the Italian hospital network. On the basis of the Italian hospital network with many cardiology facilities encompassing a total of 405 intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) across the country, 224 (3.68 per million inhabitants) of which have on-site 24-h PCI capability, but with relatively few centres equipped with cardiac surgery and nuclear medicine, in the present article, the SIECVI Task Force for Management of Infective Endocarditis develops the idea of a network where 'functional' reference centres act as a link with the periphery and with 'structural' reference centres. A number of minimum characteristics are provided for these 'functional' reference centres. Outcome and cost analysis of implementing an Endocarditis Team with functional referral is expected to be derived from ongoing Italian and European registries.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Endocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Regionalização da Saúde/normas , Consenso , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Kardiol Pol ; 77(5): 561-567, 2019 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is increasing worldwide, but no detailed data are available for Poland. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data of patients hospitalized due to CDRIE in 22 Polish referential cardiology centers from May 1, 2016 to May 1, 2017. METHODS: Participating cardiology departments were asked to fill in a questionnaire that included data on the number of hospitalized patients, number and types of implanted cardiac electrotherapy devices, and number of infective endocarditis cases. We also collected clinical data and data regarding the management of patients with CDRIE. RESULTS: Overall, 99 621 hospitalizations were reported. Infective endocarditis unrelated to cardiac device was the cause of 596 admissions (0.6%), and CDRIE, of 195 (0.2%). Pacemaker was implanted in 91 patients with CDRIE (47%); cardioverter­defibrillator, in 51 (26%); cardiac resynchronization therapy­defibrillator, in 48 (25%); and cardiac resynchronization therapy­pacemaker, in 5 (2.5%). The most common symptoms were malaise (62%), fever/chills (61%), cough (21%), chest pain (19.5%), and inflammation of the device pocket (5.6%). Cultures were positive in 77.5% of patients. The cardiac device was removed in 91% of patients. The percutaneous approach was most common for cardiac device removal. All patients received antibiotic therapy, and 3 patients underwent a heart valve procedure. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 80% of patients. The most common complication was heart failure (25% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical profile, pathogen types, and management strategies in Polish patients with CDRIE are consistent with similar data from other European countries. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed less frequently than recommended. The removal rate in the Polish population is consistent with the general rates observed for interventional treatment in patients with CDRIE.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Endocardite/etiologia , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Endocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Endocardite/cirurgia , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Polônia/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA