Are Prophylactic Systemic Antibiotics Required in Patients with Cataract Surgery at Local Anesthesia?

The reduced use of antimicrobial drugs has been recommended worldwide, according to the global action for antimicrobial resistance published in 2015 by the World Health Organization. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the incidence of surgical site infection in consecutive patients with cataract surgeries at a single hospital in the 6-year process when prophylactic systemic antibiotics were reduced in a step-by-step manner. The entire study period from 2016 to 2022 was divided into five stages, based on the use of systemic antibiotics. In stage 1 with 649 cataract surgeries, an intravenous drip infusion of cefazolin 1 g was given at surgery, followed by oral cefdinir 100 mg in the evening on surgery day and three times for two postoperative days. In stage 2 with 541 cataract surgeries, oral cefdinir 100 mg was given in the late morning before surgery, in the evening, and three times (300 mg in total) for two postoperative days. In stage 3 with 103 cataract surgeries, oral levofloxacin 500 mg was given in the late morning before surgery and once in the morning for two postoperative days. In stage 4 with 545 cataract surgeries, oral levofloxacin 500 mg was given only in the late morning before surgery. In stage 5 with 311 cataract surgeries, no systemic antibiotics were given. As common procedures in all stages, moxifloxacin eye drops were given four times daily as topical antibiotics in the 3 days before surgery and about 2 weeks after surgery. At surgery, the ocular surface was frequently irrigated with saline-diluted povidone iodine at 0.5% working concentration. No postoperative infection was recorded in any stage. This study showed neither harm nor risk in reduced use and, consequently, no use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in cataract surgery as far as local precautionary measures were secured.

Anesthesia techniques and the risk of complications as reflected in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in anesthesia techniques for cataract surgery over the past decade and their relationship to surgical complications. SETTING: Clinics affiliated with the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study. METHODS: Variables include patient demographics, visual acuity, ocular comorbidities, surgery characteristics, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications for the study period from January 2008, to December 2018. The anesthesia methods registered in the EUREQUO and included in the study are topical, combined topical and intracameral, sub-Tenon, regional, and general anesthesia. Multivariate logistic regression models for each complication were constructed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Complete data were available of 1 354 036 cataract surgeries. Topical anesthesia increased significantly over time (from 30% to 76%, P < .001). Sub-Tenon and regional anesthesia decreased (from 27% and 38% to 16% and 6%, respectively, P < .001), and general and combined topical and intracameral anesthesia remained stable (around 2%). Sub-Tenon (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91, P < .001), regional (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78, P < .001), general (0.53; 95% CI, 0.50-0.56, P < .001), and intracameral anesthesia (0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90, P = .001) carried a significantly decreased risk of posterior capsule rupture (PCR), with and without dropped nucleus, compared with topical anesthesia. The risk of endophthalmitis was significantly lower with regional anesthesia compared with topical anesthesia (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical anesthesia for cataract surgery increased over time. Topical anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of PCR with and without dropped nucleus, and endophthalmitis.

Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis: clinical settings, antibiotic susceptibility, and visual outcomes.

Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis is clinically more severe, more difficult to treat, and carry a higher risk of vision loss, evisceration, or enucleation. This study is to investigate the clinical settings, antibiotic susceptibility, and visual outcomes of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis was diagnosed in 38 eyes of 38 patients. The main clinical features were postcataract endophthalmitis (n = 13, 34%) and endophthalmitis associated with corneal ulcer (n = 12, 32%), trauma (n = 6, 16%), endogenous etiology (n = 4, 11%), trabeculectomy (n = 2, 5%), and pterygium excision-related scleral ulcer (n = 1, 3%). Presenting visual acuity ranged from counting fingers to no light perception. Pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was performed in 17 eyes (39%) in primary or secondary treatments. S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (38/38, 100%), penicillin (37/38, 97%), ceftriaxone (37/38, 97%), cefuroxime (12/15, 80%), levofloxacin (13/15 ,87%), and moxifloxacin (15/17, 88%). Final visual acuity was better than 20/400 in 3 of 38 eyes (8%), 5/200 to hand motions in 3 eyes (8%), and light perception to no light perception in 32 eyes (84%). Ten eyes (26%) underwent evisceration or enucleation. Although S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis had a very poor visual prognosis.

Mild temperature photothermal assisted anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory nanosystem for synergistic treatment of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis.

Rationale: Endophthalmitis, which is one of the severest complications of cataract surgeries, can seriously threaten vision and even lead to irreversible blindness owing to its complicated microenvironment, including both local bacterial infection and severe inflammation. It is urgent to develop a comprehensive treatment for both anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory effects. Methods: Herein, we developed AuAgCu2O-bromfenac sodium nanoparticles (AuAgCu2O-BS NPs), which was designed to combine anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory effects for integrated therapy of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. The AuAgCu2O-BS NPs could eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacterial strain relied on their photodynamic effects and the release of metal ions (Ag+ and Cu+) by the hollow AuAgCu2O nanostructures mediated mild photothermal effects. The anti-inflammatory drug, bromfenac sodium, released from the nanoparticles were able to significantly reduce the local inflammation of the endophthalmitis and promote tissue rehabilitation. In vivo bacterial elimination and anti-inflammation were confirmed by a postcataract endophthalmitis rabbit model. Results: Excellent antibacterial ability of AuAgCu2O-BS NPs was verified both in vitro and in vivo. Ophthalmological clinical observation and pathologic histology analysis showed prominent treatment of inflammatory reaction. Importantly, the mild temperature photothermal effect not only promoted the release of metal ions and bromfenac sodium but also avoided the thermal damage of the surrounding tissues, which was more suitable for the practical application of ophthalmology due to the complex structure of the eyeball. Moreover, superior biocompatibility was approved by the preliminary toxicity investigations, including low cytotoxicity, negligible damage to major organs, and stable intraocular pressure. Conclusions: Our studies of nanosystem provide a promising synergic therapeutic strategy for postcataract endophthalmitis treatment with favorable prognosis and promise in clinical translations.

Infectious postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed over 7 years. The role of azithromycin versus ciprofloxacin eye drops.

OBJECTIVE: Although topical antibiotics have been used as antimicrobial prophylaxis after ocular surgery, recent studies have determined that intracameral cefuroxime at the end of surgery significantly reduce the risk to suffer an infection and suggest that the use of topical antibiotics in the prophylaxis of infectious postoperative endophthalmitis (IPOE) is controversial. Moreover, there is no evidence to confirm the higher effectiveness of topical ciprofloxacin, considered the standard of care, or topical azithromycin in preventing IPOE of cataract surgeries. METHODS: IPOE topical prophylaxis was performed with two different strategies: with azithromycin from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2014 (group I) and with ciprofloxacin from January 1st, 2015 to January 31st, 2017 (group II). Patient characteristics and clinical signs and symptoms of IPOE from all consecutive cataract surgeries performed over a 7-year period were collected. RESULTS: A total of 15,146 cataract surgeries were conducted; 10,756 in group I and 4,390 in group II. Two cases of IPOE in each group were diagnosed, showing a 0.019% and 0.046% rate respectively, with no statistically significance. IPOE cases were related with aging, systemic and ocular comorbidities or with a complicated cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of the application of topical antibiotics after cataract surgery is questionable when intracameral cefuroxime prophylaxis is performed and no better effectiveness with ciprofloxacin or azithromycin was observed.

[Research on the surgery treatment and etiology of fungal endophthalmitis].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of vitrectomy and etiological diagnosis in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. Methods: A retrospective survey was done on the clinical manifestation, etiological diagnosis and treatment efficacy of 15 patients (15 eyes) who had been diagnosed with fungal endophthalmitis at the inpatient department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital during 2002-2015. A total of 15 eyes of 15 patients, 3 male and 12 female patients, were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was (45.8±15.3) years. Among the 15 eyes, 12 (12 patients) were diagnosed with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis and 3 (3 patients) were diagnosed with exogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Fourteen eyes have been misdiagnosed with uveitis, systematic or local application of glucocorticoid and/or immunosuppressor have been conducted on the patients which resulted in exacerbation. Baseline visual acuity: light perception in 2 eyes, hand movement for 12 eyes, and 1 eye of 0.1. Six eyes showed slight inflammatory reaction in anterior chamber, four eyes showed moderate inflammatory reaction in anterior chamber, while five eyes showed severe inflammatory reaction with hypopyon in anterior chamber. B-Scan ultrasound examination showed inflammatory vitreous opacity in all 15 eyes, combined proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) were found in 11 eyes, retinal detachment were found in 10 eyes, which include 6 cases of tractional retinal detachment, 1 case of exudative retinal detachment, and 3 cases of retinal and choroid detachment. Forty eyes underwent vitrectomy, 1 eye underwent intravitreal injection. Nine eyes were processed with silicone oil tamponade, one eye was processed with C(3)F(8) tamponade. At the beginning of the operation, vitreous fluids were collected for preparing smears which were later used for fungus culture and drug susceptibility testing. Results: According to the smear results of vitreous fluid, fungal hyphae and spores were found in 10 eyes. The fungus culture indicated positive results in 12 eyes, including candida albicans in 6 eyes, fusarium, candida parapsilosis, paecilomyces lilacinus, asoergullus terreus, mulan candida and aspergillus in 1 eye respectively. Based on etiological diagnosis, 14 eyes received amphotericin B intraocular injection during operation, and 9 patients received fluconazole (venous transfusion or oral administration), 2 patients received voriconazole through venous transfusion or oral administration, one patient received itraconazole through oral administration. All 15 eyes received local application of amphotericin B eyedrop or fluconazole eyedrop. The intraocular inflammations in all 15 eyes were mitigated. The visual acuity improved in 6 eyes, remained unchanged in 4 eyes, and reduced in 5 eyes. Postoperative visual acuity achieved 0.1 to 0.15 in 2 eyes, 0.01 to 0.04 in 2 eyes, CF in 2 eyes, HM in 4 eyes, LP in 2 eyes, and NLP in 3 eyes. The retina of 5 eyes remained in position, the retina of 2 eyes reattached, the retina of 2 eyes failed to reattach. Recurrent retinal detachment happened in the other 6 eyes, 5 of which received reoperation. Eventually, the retina of 10 eyes reattached, and the retina of the 5 eyes failed to reattach. Conclusions: Vitrectomy is an effective method for treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. The positive rates of vitreous smear and fungus culture were really high. Application of sensitive anti-fungal drugs based on etiological diagnose can improve therapeutic level. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2018, 54: 270-276).

Clinical outcomes after injection of a compounded pharmaceutical for prophylaxis after cataract surgery: a large-scale review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate relevant clinical outcomes following a transzonular intravitreal injection of a compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin-vancomycin (TMV) formulation for postoperative prophylaxis after cataract surgery in a retrospective review of medical records from a private practice, single-specialty ambulatory center in New Jersey, USA. RECENT FINDINGS: The analysis included 1541 cases from 922 patients who underwent cataract surgery with an intravitreal injection of TMV from November 2013 to December 2014. Cataract surgery was performed by a standard clear corneal phacoemulsification technique. Transzonular injection was used to deliver TMV directly into the anterior vitreous after implantation of an intraocular lens. SUMMARY: There were no major intraoperative complications associated with the transzonular injection technique. There were no cases of postoperative endophthalmitis. Nearly 92% of cases (n = 1413/1541) did not require supplemental medication after surgery. The rate of breakthrough inflammation at Days 14-21 was 9.2% (n = 132/1429). The rate of visually significant postoperative cystoid macular edema was 2.0% (n = 28/1429). The rate of clinically significant postoperative intraocular pressure increase was low: 0.9% (n = 13/1425) of cases had an at least 10 mmHg increase at Days 14-21 or 90. Four of these cases had intraocular pressure at least 30 mmHg. The rates of infection and inflammation reported in this retrospective review of a transzonular injection of TMV for prophylaxis after cataract surgery appear similar to reported rates with alternative prophylactic therapies such as topical drops. The transzonular injection of TMV may have advantages in terms of patient compliance.

Budget impact assessment of Aprokam® compared with unlicensed cefuroxime for prophylaxis of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis.

BACKGROUND: Intracameral cefuroxime is recommended as prophylaxis against postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) following cataract surgery. Aprokam is the only licensed product for prophylaxis of POE, although unlicensed intracameral cefuroxime may be administered using pre-filled syringes (PFS), either prepared in hospital by reconstituting cefuroxime via serial dilution (prepared PFS), or commercially purchased (purchased PFS). This study aimed to estimate the potential budget impact of using Aprokam over unlicensed cefuroxime for intracameral administration. METHODS: A budget impact model (BIM) was developed from UK NHS hospital perspective to estimate the economic impact of adopting Aprokam compared with purchased PFS or prepared PFS for the prophylaxis of POE following cataract surgery over a 5-year time horizon. The BIM incorporated direct costs only, associated with the acquisition, delivery, storage, preparation, and administration of cefuroxime. Resource utilisation costs were also incorporated; resource utilisation was sourced from a panel survey of hospital pharmacists, surgeons, and theatre nurses who are involved in the delivery, storage, preparation, quality assurance, or administration of cefuroxime formulations. Unit costs were sourced from NHS sources; drug acquisition costs were sourced from BNF. The model base case used a hypothetical cohort comprising of 1000 surgeries in the first year and followed a 5.2 % annual increase each year. RESULTS: The model predicts Aprokam is cost saving compared with purchased PFS, with a modest increase compared prepared PFS over 5 years. There are total savings of £ 3490 with Aprokam compared with purchased PFS, driven by savings in staff costs that offset greater drug acquisition costs. Compared with prepared PFS, there are greater drug acquisition costs which drive an increased total cost over 5 years of £ 13,177 with Aprokam, although there are substantial savings in staff costs as well as consumables and equipment costs. CONCLUSIONS: The lower direct costs of using Aprokam compared with purchased PFS presents a strong argument for the adoption of Aprokam where purchased PFS is administered. The additional benefits of Aprokam include increased liability coverage and possible reduction in dilution errors and contaminations; as such, in hospitals where unlicensed prepared PFS is used, modest additional resources should be allocated to adoption of Aprokam.

Vitrectomy using 0.025% povidone-iodine in balanced salt solution plus for the treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the bactericidal effect of 0.025% povidone-iodine in Balanced Salt Solution PLUS (0.025% PI-BSS PLUS) and its use in vitrectomy for postoperative endophthalmitis. METHODS: First, an experimental laboratory model using Staphylococcus aureus was used to evaluate the bactericidal effect of PI-BSS PLUS. Next, in a case series of 4 eyes with postoperative endophthalmitis, vitrectomy using 0.025% PI-BSS PLUS as irrigation solution was conducted, followed by postoperative intravitreal and intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: In in vitro study, PI at concentrations of 0.01% and above in BSS PLUS exhibited marked bactericidal effect after 15 seconds of exposure. Bactericidal effect of 0.025% PI-BSS PLUS was maintained at room temperature storage for 15 minutes but was attenuated after 30 minutes. Among 4 eyes that underwent vitrectomy using 0.025% PI-BSS PLUS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp. was isolated in 1 eye at the beginning but not at completion of surgery. In all four eyes, endophthalmitis was resolved with no adverse events. Ocular toxicity was not observed. CONCLUSION: The 0.025% PI-BSS PLUS is bactericidal and nontoxic when used as irrigation solution in vitrectomy. In 4 cases of postoperative endophthalmitis, vitrectomy using 0.025% PI-BSS PLUS followed by postoperative antibiotics resolved endophthalmitis.

A one-year follow-up study on the incidence and risk of endophthalmitis after pyogenic liver abscess.

PURPOSE: Although endophthalmitis secondary to pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is becoming a globally emerging infectious disease, population-based investigations evaluating the relationship between PLA and endogenous endophthalmitis remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk of endogenous endophthalmitis in patients with PLA compared with unaffected individuals by using a nationwide, population-based dataset. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: This study used data sourced from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. In total, 12 727 patients with PLA were included in the study group and 63 635 matched subjects were randomly extracted as a comparison group. METHODS: Stratified Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to assess the effect of PLA on the hazard of developing endogenous endophthalmitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence and risk of endogenous endophthalmitis between the study group and comparison group. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 148 subjects (0.10%) were diagnosed with endophthalmitis during the 1-year follow-up period. Endophthalmitis was found in 106 patients (0.84%) with PLA and 42 comparison patients (0.07%). After adjusting for patient monthly income, geographic location, and urbanization level, those suffering from PLA were found to have a greater likelihood of developing endophthalmitis during the 1-year follow-up period than comparison patients (hazard ratio [HR], 12.83; 95% confidence interval, 8.94-18.41). Stratification did not reveal any large differences in the adjusted HRs for endophthalmitis between PLA patients suffering from diabetes and those in whom diabetes was absent. We further analyzed the etiology of cases with endogenous endophthalmitis in this investigation and found Klebsiella pneumonia to be the causative organism among 75.5% of the cases but only 33.4% of the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the incidence and risk of developing endophthalmitis was significantly higher among patients with PLA compared with matched controls irrespective of diabetes status.

Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for suspected acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Administrative data from more than 440,000 consecutive cataract surgeries in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2006. METHODS: Consecutive physician billing claims for cataract surgery and specific intraoperative and postoperative procedures related to complications of cataract surgery were identified. Acute endophthalmitis was defined using surrogate markers for intraocular infection, including vitrectomy, vitreous injection, or aspiration procedures not in combination with air/fluid exchange or dislocated lens extraction, performed 1 to 14 days after cataract surgery. Anterior vitrectomy performed on the day of surgery was used as a surrogate marker for capsular rupture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall rates of endophthalmitis were calculated and grouped by patient demographics, surgical facility, season, year, and association with capsular rupture. RESULTS: There were 617 suspected acute endophthalmitis cases of 442,177 cataract surgeries over the 4 years. The overall unadjusted and adjusted rates of suspected acute endophthalmitis were both 1.4 per 1000 cataract surgeries. Men had higher rates than women (1.70 vs. 1.19/1000 surgeries, P<0.0001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.64).The oldest age group (>or= 85 years) had the highest rate (2.18/1000), and the youngest group (20-64) had the second highest rate (1.76/1000). The endophthalmitis rates for these age groups were significantly different from those aged 65 to 84 years. The endophthalmitis rate was approximately 10-fold higher in those with capsular rupture compared with those without (13.11 vs. 1.34/1000, P<0.0001), with an adjusted odds ratio of 9.56 (95% confidence interval, 6.43-14.2). CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates of suspected acute endophthalmitis are low but significantly higher in certain patient groups. Our population-based analysis can be used as a benchmark for quality-improvement initiatives and can assist clinicians in educating their patients regarding the risks associated with cataract surgery. Future work is required to address the higher rate of endophthalmitis in men, those with capsular rupture, and the oldest patients undergoing cataract surgery.

[Advantages of corticosteroids in managing acute bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis]. / Intérêt des corticoïdes dans la prise en charge de l'endophtalmie postopératoire aiguë bactérienne.

Most studies show a trend toward a beneficial or at least neutral effect of associating corticosteroids and antibiotics. However, caution must be taken, with various factors considered: the type, virulence, and size of the inoculum, and the treatment chosen. Early intravitreal administration of 400 microg of dexamethasone seems to be beneficial in treating postoperative Staphylococcus epidermidis-related endophthalmitis. However, a large-scale prospective, randomized, controlled study is mandatory to gain evidence supporting steroid therapy in postoperative endophthalmitis.

Técnica para injeção intravítrea de drogas no tratamento de doenças vítreorretinianas / Technique of intravitreal drug injection for therapy of vitreoretinal diseases

A injeção intravítrea é atualmente a técnica mais utilizada no tratamento de várias doenças vítreorretinianas. Neste artigo serão discutidas a técnica e complicações da injeção intravítrea de drogas no tratamento de doenças vítreorretinianas. Em resumo, a técnica envolve várias etapas. Inicialmente dias antes da injeção pode-se realizar aplicação de antibióticos e acetazolamida para prevenção de infecção e redução da pressão intra-ocular. Antes do procedimento deve-se dilatar a pupila e executar anestesia tópica com colírios ou gel anestésico. A antissepsia pré-operatória envolve aplicação de colírios de iodo-povidona 5 por cento no fundo de saco conjuntival ao menos 10 minutos antes do procedimento. A injeção deve ser realizada no centro cirúrgico com uso de luvas estéreis e máscara pelo cirurgião. O olho deve ser exposto com blefarostato estéril, e proteção com "sterile-drape" para evitar contato entre a agulha e pálpebras/cílios. A agulha deve ser posicionada no momento da injeção a 3,5 - 4 mm do limbo, e leve mobilização da conjuntiva com um cotonete estéril ou uma pinça facilitam a penetração da agulha através da conjuntiva e esclera. A agulha deve ser inserida gentilmente para dentro da cavidade vítrea até 6 mm de profundidade. Imediatamente após a injeção o paciente deve ser examinado por técnica de oftalmoscopia binocular indireta. Caso a acuidade visual seja ausência de percepção luminosa ou oclusão vascular arterial retiniana seja observada, terapias para diminuição da pressão como paracentese na camada anterior ou massagem por oculopressão diretamente sobre o globo ocular devem ser imediatamente tomadas. A alta ambulatorial deve ser realizada quando o cirurgião estiver ciente da ausência de complicações intra-operatórias; o paciente deverá sair do centro cirúrgico com curativo oclusivo. O paciente deve ser submetido a exame oftalmológico completo no primeiro dia pós-operatório quando associação de antibióticos com corticosteróides...

Intravitreal injections are the standard technique applied in the treatment of some vitreoretinal diseases. In this paper the technique and complications of intravitreal injections are presented. In summary, the procedure involves various consecutive steps. Initially, days before the treatment topical antibiotics and acetazolamide may be prescribed for reduction of the ocular flora and intraocular pressure. Before the injection, the pupil should be dilated and topical anesthesia should be achieved. Injection shall be performed in the operating room under sterile conditions, the surgeon should wear surgical gloves and mask. The eye is then exposed with sterile blepharostat and sterile-drape thereby providing protection of the needle against the contact with contaminated lashes and lids. Injection is done 3.5 mm from the limbus through the pars plana. The needle should be inserted up to 6 mm into the vitreous cavity. Immediately after injection the patient must be examined by indirect ophthalmoscopy to verify central artery perfusion and complications as vitreous hemorrhage. Visual acuity better than light perception should be detected right after injection. If persistent central retinal artery occlusion is diagnosed, anterior chamber paracentesis should be performed. The patient may be discharged with an occlusive patch. Examination at the first postoperative day should exclude various complications such as endophthalmitis, and topical steroid and antibiotics should be prescribed for 7 days. Some complications encountered after intravitreal injections include retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, cataract, uveitis, ocular hypertension, or endophthalmitis.