Towards comprehensive management of symptomatic endometriosis: beyond the dichotomy of medical versus surgical treatment.

Except when surgery is the only option because of organ damage, the presence of suspicious lesions, or the desire to conceive, women with endometriosis-associated pain often face a choice between medical and surgical treatment. In theory, the description of the potential benefits and potential harms of the two alternatives should be standardized, unbiased, and based on strong evidence, enabling the patient to make an informed decision. However, doctor's opinion, intellectual competing interests, local availability of specific services and (mis)information obtained from social media, and online support groups can influence the type of advice given and affect patients' choices. This is compounded by the paucity of robust data from randomized controlled trials, and the anxiety of distressed women who are eager to do anything to alleviate their disabling symptoms. Vulnerable patients are more likely to accept the suggestions of their healthcare provider, which can lead to unbalanced and physician-centred decisions, whether in favour of either medical or surgical treatment. In general, treatments should be symptom-orientated rather than lesion-orientated. Medical and surgical modalities appear to be similarly effective in reducing pain symptoms, with medications generally more successful for severe dysmenorrhoea and surgery more successful for severe deep dyspareunia caused by fibrotic lesions infiltrating the posterior compartment. Oestrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogen monotherapies are generally safe and well tolerated, provided there are no major contraindications. About three-quarters of patients with superficial peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis and two-thirds of those with infiltrating fibrotic lesions are ultimately satisfied with their medical treatment although the remainder may experience side effects, which may result in non-compliance. Surgery for superficial and ovarian endometriosis is usually safe. When fibrotic infiltrating lesions are present, morbidity varies greatly depending on the skill of the individual surgeon, the need for advanced procedures, such as bowel resection and ureteral reimplantation, and the availability of expert colorectal surgeons and urologists working together in a multidisciplinary approach. The generalizability of published results is adequate for medical treatment but very limited for surgery. Moreover, on the one hand, hormonal drugs induce disease remission but do not cure endometriosis, and symptom relapse is expected when the drugs are discontinued; on the other hand, the same drugs should be used after lesion excision, which also does not cure endometriosis, to prevent an overall cumulative symptom and lesion recurrence rate of 10% per postoperative year. Therefore, the real choice may not be between medical treatment and surgery, but between medical treatment alone and surgery plus postoperative medical treatment. The experience of pain in women with endometriosis is a complex phenomenon that is not exclusively based on nociception, although the role of peripheral and central sensitization is not fully understood. In addition, trauma, and especially sexual trauma, and pelvic floor disorders can cause or contribute to symptoms in many individuals with chronic pelvic pain, and healthcare providers should never take for granted that diagnosed or suspected endometriosis is always the real, or the sole, origin of the referred complaints. Alternative treatment modalities are available that can help address most of the additional causes contributing to symptoms. Pain management in women with endometriosis may be more than a choice between medical and surgical treatment and may require comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team including psychologists, sexologists, physiotherapists, dieticians, and pain therapists. An often missing factor in successful treatment is empathy on the part of healthcare providers. Being heard and understood, receiving simple and clear explanations and honest communication about uncertainties, being invited to share medical decisions after receiving detailed and impartial information, and being reassured that a team member will be available should a major problem arise, can greatly increase trust in doctors and transform a lonely and frustrating experience into a guided and supported journey, during which coping with this chronic disease is gradually learned and eventually accepted. Within this broader scenario, patient-centred medicine is the priority, and whether or when to resort to surgery or choose the medical option remains the prerogative of each individual woman.

Evaluation of the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of voiding dysfunction after endometriosis surgery.

Pelvic surgery for endometriosis is associated with a risk of bladder and digestive sequelae. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) and voiding dysfunction (VD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in treating voiding dysfunction (VD) following endometriosis surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from women who underwent SNM testing for persistent VD after endometriosis surgery. The study included 21 patients from a French tertiary referral center. Patient characteristics, lower urinary tract symptoms, urodynamic findings, SNM procedures, and outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was the success of SNM treatment for VD. After a median follow-up of 55 months, 60% of patients achieved successful outcomes, with significant improvements of VD and quality of life. Moreover, more than half of patients who required clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) before SNM were able to wean off CISC. Complications such as infections and paraesthesia were observed, but overall, SNM was found to be effective and well tolerated. Age and the interval between endometriosis surgery and SNM testing were associated with treatment success. This study adds to the limited existing literature on SNM for VD after endometriosis surgery and suggests that SNM can be a valuable therapeutic option for these patients. Further research is needed to identify predictive factors and mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of SNM in this context. MRI-compatible and rechargeable devices, has improved the feasibility of SNM for these patients. In conclusion, SNM offers promise as a treatment option for persistent VD after endometriosis surgery, warranting further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Medicines on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Endometriosis in Long-Term Management: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors related to pregnancy of endometriosis and whether Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis in long-term management. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of endometriosis patients with fertility needs from January 2019 to November 2019. A total of 252 patients with endometriosis from 5 level-III Grade A hospitals in Beijing were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed for the relevant factors. The propensity score matching (PSM) function of SPSS software was used to match the CHMs group with the non-CHMs group. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate were analyzed. RESULTS: The results of univariate analysis showed that age, disease course, presence of infertility, presence of adenomyosis, time after surgery or use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), use of CHMs and follow-up time were influencing factors of pregnancy in endometriosis patients (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that age, presence of adenomyosis, time after surgery or use of GnRH-a, use of CHMs and follow-up time were independent factors affecting pregnancy in endometriosis patients, among which, age ⩾35 years old, presence of adenomyosis and follow-up time >6 months were independent risk factors (OR=0.445, 0.348, 0.140, respectively, P<0.05), time after surgery or use of GnRH-a ⩽6 months and use of CHMs were independent protective factors (OR=3.839, 3.842, respectively, P<0.05). After PSM, 99 pairs of two groups were matched successfully. The pregnancy rate of the CHMs group was higher than that of the non-CHMs group [55.56% (55/99) vs. 36.36% (36/99), P<0.05]. The live birth rate of the CHMs group was higher than that of the non-CHMs group [49.49% (49/99) vs. 35.35% (35/99), P<0.05]. CONCLUSION: CHMs can effectively improve clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of patients with endometriosis in the chronic disease management.

Effect assessment of laparoscopy in combination with traditional Chinese medicine decoction in the treatment of endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis (EMs) affects about 10% of women of childbearing age. It is defined as functional endometrial tissue appearing in other parts of the uterine cavity, manifested by varying degrees of pelvic pain and pelvic mass, etc. Therefore, to improve the therapeutic effect of endometriosis, we must constantly explore new ways to treat the disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combined use of laparoscopy and traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of patients with EMs. METHODS: A systematic literature search will be conducted at China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang databases, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. The search period limit is from the time the date of database establishment to June 21, 2021. To ensure the comprehensiveness of the search, relevant references and conference literature are also included. The risk of bias in the final included studies will be evaluated based on the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The RevMan software will be employed to perform data synthesis and statistical analysis. RESULTS: The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery combined with traditional Chinese medicine decoction in the treatment of patients with EMs will be systematically evaluated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide strong evidence for judging whether laparoscopy combined with traditional Chinese medicine decoction is an effective strategy for the treatment of patients with EMs.

Resección intestinal por endometriosis severa, diagnóstico y tratamiento luego de la introducción de la Unidad de Endometriosis: revisión de 18 años en el Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile / Bowel resection for severe endometriosis, diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of Endometriosis Unit: 18 years review, Clinical Hospital of the University of Chile

INTRODUCCIÓN: La endometriosis intestinal afecta en gran medida la calidad de vida de una mujer joven y habitualmente requiere un tratamiento quirúrgico con resección intestinal. Esta cirugía es técnicamente compleja por las adherencias firmes del intestino a la vagina, el útero y los ovarios. OBJETIVO: Describir y analizar los resultados quirúrgicos e histopatológicos de las resecciones intestinales por endometriosis grave durante los últimos 18 años en el Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, en relación con la introducción de la unidad multidisciplinaria de endometriosis, a partir del año 2011, y las experiencias publicadas en la literatura chilena y extranjera. MÉTODO: Trabajo retrospectivo realizado en un hospital terciario desde el año 2001 hasta el año 2019. Las pacientes se asignaron a dos grupos según el período de cirugía: grupo 2001-2010 y grupo 2011-2019, luego de la introducción de la unidad de endometriosis. Se recopilaron todas las pacientes a las que se realizó una resección intestinal (discoidal o segmentaria) por endometriosis, por laparotomía o laparoscopía. Los datos distribuidos normalmente se presentan como promedio ± DE y los datos no paramétricos como mediana (rango). Las comparaciones demográficas de variables continuas se hicieron con la prueba t de Student y las de las variables categóricas con las pruebas de ji al cuadrado o de Fisher. La significación estadística se estableció en p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Se recopilaron 52 casos. El 94,2% de las cirugías fueron electivas. El 5,8% fueron de urgencia por obstrucción intestinal (todas entre 2001 y 2010). Un 75% de las cirugías fueron laparoscópicas. Se realizó resección segmentaria en el 67,3%, resección discoidal simple en el 28,8%, resección discoidal doble en el 1,9% y resección segmentaria y una discoidal en el 1,9%. La histopatología demostró compromiso de la lesión hasta la mucosa intestinal en un 7,7%. Hubo franca disminución del dolor en el seguimiento de las pacientes. El 24% de las pacientes con deseo de embarazo y endometriosis intestinal lograron un parto de término mediante fecundación in vitro o espontáneamente. Hubo cuatro complicaciones posoperatorias, tres de ellas de categoría II según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo y una de categoría IV A con reintervención a las 72 horas. Al comparar ambos periodos, en 2001-2010 los exámenes diagnósticos utilizados fueron ecografía transvaginal (0%), enema baritado (60%), tomografía computarizada de abdomen y pelvis (45%) y resonancia magnética pelviana (20%), mientras que en 2011-2019 fueron ecografía transvaginal (100%), enema baritado (3%), tomografía computarizada (3%) y resonancia magnética pelviana (66%). En 2001-2010, las lesiones fueron más más infiltrativas (mayor compromiso mucoso y submucoso) (75 vs. 16% de las resecciones intestinales; p < 0,05), estenóticas (cirugías de urgencia por obstrucción), con mayor porcentaje de resecciones segmentarias (100 vs. 46,9%; p < 0,05) y más días de hospitalización (5,8 ± 2,3 vs. 4,1 ± 0,9 días) que en 2011-2019. CONCLUSIONES: A nuestro entender, esta es la serie más grande publicada en Chile de resecciones intestinales por endometriosis. Estos hallazgos demuestran cómo la introducción de la unidad multidisciplinaria de endometriosis permite un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento quirúrgico eficaz y oportuno, tal como se decribe en la literatura.

INTRODUCTION: Bowel endometriosis severely affects a young woman's quality of life and often requires surgical treatment with bowel resection. This surgery is technically complex due to the tight adhesions of the intestine to the vagina, uterus, and ovaries. The objective of this work is to describe and analyze the surgical and histopathological results of intestinal resections for severe endometriosis during the last 18 years at the Clinical Hospital University of Chile, in relation to the implementation of the multidisciplinary endometriosis unit, based on the year 2011 and the experiences published in Chilean and foreign literature. METHOD: Retrospective work carried out in a tertiary hospital from 2001 to 2019. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the surgery period: group 2001-2010 and group 2011-2019, after endometriosis unit formation. All patients who underwent bowel resection (discoidal or segmental) for endometriosis by laparotomy or laparoscopy were collected. Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD and nonparametric data as median (range). Demographic comparisons of continuous variables are compared using Student's t test and categorical variables using chi squared or Fisher's test. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 52 cases were collected. 94.2% of the surgeries were elective. 5.8% were urgent due to intestinal obstruction (all between 2001 and 2010). 75% of the surgeries were laparoscopic. Segmental resection 67.3%, simple discoidal resection 28.8%, double discoidal resection 1.9% and segmental resection and a discoidal resection 1.9%. Histopathology showed involvement of the lesion up to the intestinal mucosa in 7.7%. A marked decrease in pain in the follow-up of the patients. 24% of the patients with a desire for pregnancy and intestinal endometriosis achieved a full-term delivery by IVF or spontaneously. There were four postoperative complications, three of them category II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and one category IV A complication with reoperation at 72 h. When comparing both periods, between 2001-2010 the diagnostic tests used were: transvaginal ultrasound (ECO TV) (0%), barium enema (BE) (60%), abdomen pelvis CT (45%) and pelvic resonance (MRI) (20%). Between 2011 and 2019 ECO TV (100%), EB (3%), TAC (3%) RM (66%). In the period 2001 to 2010, the lesions were more infiltrative (greater mucosal and submucosal involvement) (75% vs 16% of intestinal resections (P <0.05)), stenotic (urgent surgery for obstruction), with a higher percentage of resections segmental (100% vs 46.9% (P <0.05) and more days of hospitalization (5.8 ± 2.3 SD vs 4.1 ± 0.9 SD) than in the period from 2011 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest series published in Chile of intestinal resections for endometriosis. These findings demonstrate how the introduction of the multidisciplinary endometriosis unit allows early diagnosis and effective and timely surgical treatment as described in the literature.

Providing new insights into the endometriosisassociated cancer arising in episiotomy scars.

Endometriosis-associated malignancy in an episiotomy scar is rare. The predictive factors are poorly understood as are the mechanisms and pathways associated with implantation and malignant transformation. In this study we describe the cases reported in the literature of malignancies arising in endometriosis foci of an episiotomy scar. We identified 5 cases described between 1990 and 2016. These cases represent recurrence of endometriotic lesions in an episiotomy scar after previous diagnosis of endometriosis, 3 to 25 months before. Histology revealed clear cell tumours in 4 cases and a serous papillary carcinoma. The approach encompassed surgical removal for diagnosis and as part of the therapeutic strategy. Adjuvant treatment was performed depending on classical prognostic factors. Mechanisms of endometriosis implantation in scars include the influence of estrogens in the healing process and activation of COX-2, aromatase and matrix metalloproteinases. Nevertheless, for malignant transformation, other pathways seem to play a role, namely inflammation, immune response and oxidative stress, induced by iron deposits due to haemorrhage. Further studies are needed to allow the establishment of a predictive model for malignant transformation of endometriosis in episiotomy scars.

Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is associated with pain and infertility. Surgical interventions aim to remove visible areas of endometriosis and restore the anatomy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of pain and infertility associated with endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS: This review has drawn on the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group including searching the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, reference lists for relevant trials, and trial registries from inception to April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgery with any other laparoscopic or robotic intervention, holistic or medical treatment, or diagnostic laparoscopy only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed selection of studies, assessment of trial quality and extraction of relevant data with disagreements resolved by a third review author. We collected data for the core outcome set for endometriosis. Primary outcomes included overall pain and live birth. We evaluated the quality of evidence using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 RCTs. The studies randomised 1563 women with endometriosis. Four RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic excision with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with laparoscopic ablation or excision and uterine suspension. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection with diagnostic laparoscopy only. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation with diagnostic laparoscopy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Two RCTs compared laparoscopic ablation with laparoscopic excision. One RCT compared laparoscopic ablation or excision with helium thermal coagulator with laparoscopic ablation or excision with electrodiathermy. One RCT compared conservative laparoscopic surgery with laparoscopic colorectal resection of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Common limitations in the primary studies included lack of clearly described blinding, failure to fully describe methods of randomisation and allocation concealment, and poor reporting of outcome data. Laparoscopic treatment versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on overall pain scores compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only at six months (mean difference (MD) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 1.49; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence) and at 12 months (MD 1.65, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.19; 1 RCT, 16 participants; very low quality evidence), where a positive value means pain relief (the higher the score, the more pain relief) and a negative value reflects pain increase (the lower the score, the worse the increase in pain). No studies looked at live birth. We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment on quality of life compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only: EuroQol-5D index summary at six months (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence), 12-item Short Form (SF-12) mental health component (MD 2.30, 95% CI -4.50 to 9.10; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence) and SF-12 physical health component (MD 2.70, 95% CI -2.90 to 8.30; 1 RCT, 39 participants; low quality evidence). Laparoscopic treatment probably improves viable intrauterine pregnancy rate compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.86; 3 RCTs, 528 participants; I2 = 0%; moderate quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic treatment compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only on ectopic pregnancy (MD 1.18, 95% CI 0.10 to 13.48; 1 RCT, 100 participants; low quality evidence) and miscarriage (MD 0.94, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.54; 2 RCTs, 112 participants; low quality evidence). There was limited reporting of adverse events. No conversions to laparotomy were reported in both groups (1 RCT, 341 participants). Laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection versus diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic ablation and uterine nerve transection on adverse events (more specifically vascular injury) compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.32; 1 RCT, 141 participants; low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Laparoscopic ablation versus laparoscopic excision There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was a difference in overall pain, measured at 12 months, for laparoscopic ablation compared with laparoscopic excision (MD 0.00, 95% CI -1.22 to 1.22; 1 RCT, 103 participants; very low quality evidence). No studies looked at overall pain scores at six months, live birth, quality of life, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and adverse events. Helium thermal coagulator versus electrodiathermy We are uncertain whether helium thermal coagulator compared to electrodiathermy improves quality of life using the 30-item Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) at nine months, when considering the components: pain (MD 6.68, 95% CI -3.07 to 16.43; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), control and powerlessness (MD 4.79, 95% CI -6.92 to 16.50; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence), emotional well-being (MD 6.17, 95% CI -3.95 to 16.29; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence) and social support (MD 5.62, 95% CI -6.21 to 17.45; 1 RCT, 119 participants; very low quality evidence). Adverse events were not estimable. No studies looked at overall pain scores (at six and 12 months), live birth, viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only, it is uncertain whether laparoscopic surgery reduces overall pain associated with minimal to severe endometriosis. No data were reported on live birth. There is moderate quality evidence that laparoscopic surgery increases viable intrauterine pregnancy rates confirmed by ultrasound compared to diagnostic laparoscopy only. No studies were found that looked at live birth for any of the comparisons. Further research is needed considering the management of different subtypes of endometriosis and comparing laparoscopic interventions with lifestyle and medical interventions. There was insufficient evidence on adverse events to allow any conclusions to be drawn regarding safety.

Frequency and clinical impact of Dolichocolon in women submitted to surgery for rectosigmoid endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: Rectosigmoid endometriosis and Dolichocolon can both present with a triad of chronic abdominal pain, constipation and bloating. The relationship between these two pathologies is unknown. The present study aims to determine the frequency of DC in women with rectosigmoid endometriosis and its possible impact on pre- and post-operative symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 113 consecutive patients submitted to magnetic resonance imaging enema and subsequent complete surgical removal for symptomatic rectosigmoid endometriosis between June 2015 to June 2018. Dolichocolon is an anatomic variant characterized by redundancies and lengthening of the colon. We divided our study population according to its presence or absence. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, surgical findings and pre- and post-operative clinical variables. Pain symptoms were assessed through numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Bowel complaints included constipation, bloating and diarrhea. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (31 %) presented a dolichocolon at magnetic resonance imaging enema. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic data, pre-operative clinical variables and surgical findings. At 6-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement of symptoms, except for constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group. In particular, we observed with a statistical difference (p < .05) the persistence of constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group compared to non-dolichocolon group. CONCLUSIONS: Dolichocolon was observed in one third patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis and could influence surgical outcomes for rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of relief of bowel symptoms.

Chinese Medicine Sequential Therapy Improves Pregnancy Outcomes after Surgery for Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Placebo Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine (CM) improving pregnancy outcomes after surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo parallel controlled clinical trial was designed. A total of 202 patients who had laparoscopy for endometriosis-associated infertility with qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome were included and randomly divided into the CM treatment group and placebo control group at a ratio of 1:1 using a central block randomization from May 2014 to September 2017, 101 patients in each group. The two groups received continuous intervention at 1-5 days after surgery, for 6 menstrual cycles. Before ovulation, the CM group was treated Huoxue Xiaoyi Granule (); after ovulation, Bushen Zhuyun Granule ( was involved. The control group was treated with placebo. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed every menstrual cycle during the treatment, and female hormone levels in the follicular and luteal phases were measured during the 1st, 3rd and 6th menstrual cycles. The analysis was continued until pregnancy. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome, and the secondary outcomes were follicular development and endometrial receptivity. Safety evaluations were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: (1) Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates: the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of the CM group were significantly higher than those of the placebo group [44.6% (45/101) vs. 29.7% (30/101), 34.7% (35/101) vs. 20.8% (21/101), both P<0.05]. (2) Follicle development: the incidence of dominant follicles, rate of cumulative cycle ovulation, and rate of cumulative cycle mature follicle ovulation were significantly higher in the CM group than those in the placebo group [93.8% (350/373) vs. 89.5% (341/381), 80.4% (275/342) vs. 69.1% (253/366), 65.8% (181/275) vs 56.1% (142/253), P<0.05 or P<0.01]). The incidence of cumulative cycle luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome was significantly lower in the CM group than in the placebo group [11.7% (40/342) vs. 17.8% (65/366), P<0.05). (3) Endometrial receptivity: after treatment, both endometrial types and endometrial blood flow types in the CM group were mainly types A and B, while those in the placebo group were mainly types B and C, with a significant difference between the two groups (both P<0.05). (4) Adverse events: the incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Strategies for activating blood circulation-regulating Gan (Liver)-tonifying Shen (Kidney) sequential therapy can effectively improve the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of endometriosis-associated infertility with qi stagnation and blood stasis after laparoscopy, improve follicular development, promote ovulation, improve endometrial receptivity, while being a safe treatment option. (Trial registration No. NCT02676713).

IDEAL study: magnetic resonance imaging for suspected deep endometriosis assessment prior to laparoscopy is as reliable as radiological imaging as a complement to transvaginal ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value of using one-stop magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs standard radiological imaging as a supplement to transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) for the preoperative assessment of patients with endometriosis referred for surgery in a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: This prospective observational study compared the diagnostic value of the standard preoperative imaging practice of our center, which involves expert TVS complemented by intravenous urography (IVU) for the evaluation of the ureters and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for the evaluation of the rectum, sigmoid and cecum, with that of expert TVS complemented by a 'one-stop' MRI examination evaluating the upper abdomen, pelvis, kidneys and ureters as well as rectum and sigmoid on the same day, for the preoperative triaging of 74 women with clinically suspected deep endometriosis. The findings at laparoscopy were considered the reference standard. Patients were stratified according to their need for monodisciplinary surgical approach, carried out by gynecologists only, or multidisciplinary surgical approach, involving abdominal surgeons and/or urologists, based on the extent to which endometriosis affected the reproductive organs, bowel, ureters, bladder or other abdominal organs. RESULTS: Our standard preoperative imaging approach and the combined findings of TVS and MRI had similar diagnostic performance, resulting in correct stratification for a monodisciplinary or a multidisciplinary surgical approach of 67/74 (90.5%) patients. However, there were differences between the estimation of the severity of disease by DCBE and MRI. The severity of rectal involvement was underestimated in 2.7% of the patients by both TVS and DCBE, whereas it was overestimated in 6.8% of the patients by TVS and/or DCBE. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary to expert TVS, 'one-stop' MRI can predict intraoperative findings equally well as standard radiological imaging (IVU and DCBE) in patients referred for endometriosis surgery in a tertiary care academic center. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Chinese Medicine in Management of Chronic Disease Endometriosis.

Endometriosis (EM), a refractory, highly recurrent and life-threatening chronic disease, requires long-term management and long-term drug treatment. Our previous studies showed that Chinese medicine (CM) can inhibit the postoperative recurrence of EM, improve quality of life, shorten the time to conception and increase pregnancy rates. CM produces few adverse reactions with high safety. These characteristics might be associated with the mechanism of CM's inhibition of recurrence. Therefore, we believe that CM may represent a good choice for long-term drug treatment and is worthy of clinical application.

Alternative Treatment Utilization Before Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions at a Large Integrated Health System.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of utilization of alternative treatments before hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications within a large integrated health care system. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomies for benign gynecologic conditions between 2012 and 2014 (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a community-based integrated health system. PATIENTS: Women who underwent hysterectomy for a benign gynecologic condition between 2012 and 2014. INTERVENTIONS: From an eligible cohort of 6892 patients who underwent hysterectomy, a stratified random sample of 1050 patients were selected for chart review. Stratification was based on the proportion of indications for hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the use of alternative treatments before hysterectomy. Alternative treatments included oral hormone treatment, leuprolide, medroxyprogesterone intramuscular injections, a levonorgestrel intrauterine device, hormonal subdermal implants, endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, hysteroscopy, and myomectomy. Of the 1050 charts reviewed, 979 (93.2%) met the criteria for inclusion in this study. The predominant indication for hysterectomy was symptomatic myomas (54.4%), followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (29.0%), endometriosis (5.8%), pelvic pain (3.1%), dysmenorrhea (3.4%), and other (4.3%). The major routes of hysterectomy were laparoscopy (68.7%) and vaginal hysterectomy (13.4%). Before hysterectomy, 81.2% of patients tried at least 1 type of alternative treatment (33.8% with 1 treatment and 47.4% with at least 2 treatments), and 99.3% of patients were counseled regarding alternative treatments. Compared with younger women age <40 years, women age 45 to 49 years were less likely to use alternative treatments before hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.76). There were no variations in treatment rates by socioeconomic status or between major racial and ethnic groups. The final pathological analysis identified myomas as the most common pathology (n = 637; 65.1%); 96 patients (9.8%) had normal uterine pathology. CONCLUSION: More than 80% of patients received alternative treatments before undergoing hysterectomy for a benign gynecologic condition. Additional investigation is warranted to assess alternative treatment use as it relates to preventing unnecessary hysterectomies.

Transversus abdominis plane block under laparoscopic guide versus port-site local anaesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block (LTAP) versus port-site local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI) in reducing postoperative pain following laparoscopic excision of endometriosis. DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynaecological surgery. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic excision of endometriosis from December 2015 through July 2016. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive: port-site infiltration with bupivacaine and placebo LTAP (LAI group, n = 21); placebo port-site infiltration and LTAP with bupivacaine (LTAP group, n = 24); placebo port-site infiltration and placebo LTAP (placebo group, n = 25). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative pain at 2-4, 6-8, 10-12 and 24 hours, analgesic requirements, TAP block-related complications and opioid-related adverse effects. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient characteristics between the groups. In comparison with placebo, both LTAP and LAI groups had significantly less pain at 2-4, 6-8, and 10-12 hours (median 3, 3, 3.5 versus 3, 6, 4 versus 8, 8, 7 for LTAP, LAI, and placebo, respectively, P < 0.05). Median differences (and 95% confidence intervals) were as follows; LTAP versus placebo -5 (-6 to -4), -4 (-5 to -3), -3 (-4 to -0.5); LAI versus placebo -4 (-5 to -2), -2 (-3 to -0.5), -1 (-4 to -0.5) at 2-4, 6-8 and 10-12 hours, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the LTAP and LAI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block and LAI both reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of endometriosis, compared with placebo. We found no differences in effect between LTAP and LAI. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: TAP block and port-site local infiltration are both effective in reducing postoperative pain in major gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Questionnaire-based evaluation of sexual life after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review of prospective studies.

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a benign disease that affects women of reproductive age. Laparoscopic excision of endometriotic implants is considered one of the most effective therapeutic options. The disease and its treatment can have a major impact on psychosexual well-being but this is often overlooked as most studies focus on pain instead of sexuality in a holistic approach. The aim of this study was to review the current literature regarding the effect of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis on quality of sexual life (QoSL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines we conducted a systematic review that involved searching PubMed and Embase databases for prospective studies evaluating the effect of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis on QoSL, using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 357 papers, 17 were selected for full text evaluation. Twelve studies using seven different questionnaires fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All studies reported improvements in QoSL following laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to substantial heterogeneity among the included studies arising from differences in questionnaires, follow-up duration, stages of endometriosis, use of hormonal treatment, and missing data. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis can improve QoSL. However, there is a need for randomized controlled trials based on a new validated questionnaire regarding specifically QoSL in association with endometriosis. As sexual functioning is a complex phenomenon driven by multiple physical, psychological and social factors, QoSL should be holistically evaluated by a team of different healthcare providers, implementing treatment programs that are individualized to each woman.

Discoid Resection of Rectosigmoid Endometriotic Nodules.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show various techniques to perform laparoscopic anterior discoid resection of rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules. DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the techniques using video with narration (educational video). SETTING: Segmental bowel resection and reanastomosis are treatment options for larger rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules. However, laparoscopic anterior discoid resection of rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules is feasible and potentially less morbid in the appropriate candidate. Detailed knowledge of the avascular planes of the pelvis, particularly the pararectal and rectovaginal spaces, is crucial when approaching these nodules, which may initially present within an obliterated posterior cul-de-sac. Resection begins with determination of the nodule size followed by enucleation of the nodule itself. A 2-layer closure with barbed suture is then performed using a rectal probe as a template. Our institution previously demonstrated that barbed suture is safe to use in bowel repair and did not result in major complications [1]. An air leak test assesses the integrity of the repair and may be completed with air insufflation or with a methylene blue or povidone-iodine enema. With larger nodules, a V-shaped closure may be necessary. The patients provided consent to use images and videos of the procedure. Institutional review board approval was not required for this procedure. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic anterior discoid resection of a rectosigmoid endometriotic nodule. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic anterior discoid resection avoids the need for segmental bowel resection and reanastomosis. Barbed suture is a safe option for 2-layer bowel closure [1].

Endometriosis foci differentiation by rapid lipid profiling using tissue spray ionization and high resolution mass spectrometry.

Obtaining fast screening information on molecular composition of a tissue sample is of great importance for a disease biomarkers search and for online surgery control. In this study, high resolution mass spectrometry analysis of eutopic and ectopic endometrium tissues (90 samples) is done using direct tissue spray mass spectrometry in both positive and negative ion modes. The most abundant peaks in the both ion modes are those corresponding to lipids. Species of three lipid classes are observed, phosphatidylcholines (PC), sphingomyelins (SM) and phosphoethanolamines (PE). Direct tissue analysis gives mainly information on PC and SM lipids (29 species) in positive ion mode and PC, SM and PE lipids (50 species) in negative ion mode which gives complementary data for endometriosis foci differentiation. The biggest differences were found for phospholipids with polyunsaturated acyls and alkils. Although, tissue spray shows itself as appropriate tool for tissue investigation, caution should be paid to the interpretation of mass spectra because of their higher complexity with more possible adducts formation and multiple interferences must be taken into account. The present work extends the application of direct tissue analysis for the rapid differentiation between endometriotic tissues of different foci.

Ileocecal endometriosis: diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: Ileocecal endometriosis is rare. Symptoms range from no symptoms, cramps, vomiting, to acute intestinal obstruction. Our objective was to review our cases, clarify, and resume its most appropriate management focusing on the factors to determine diagnosis. This is a retrospective study by revision of medical charts of all ileal endometriosis cases of our unit from 2006 to 2014. CASE REPORT: Seven cases were found; three (43%) had previous endometriosis laparoscopic diagnosis, four (57%) had partial bowel obstruction episodes, three (43%) had chronic pelvic pain, and one developed acute intestinal obstruction in postoperative ileostomy closure. In three (43%), the diagnosis was made with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and double contrast barium enema, in one (14%) only with MRI, and the other three (43%) during surgery. All patients underwent resection of the ileum and evolved favorably. CONCLUSION: Variability in symptoms hinders diagnosis. The gold standard for diagnosis is MRI, but clinical suspicion optimizes imaging test diagnosis. Segmental resection should be indicated in the majority of the cases.

Functional outcomes after disc excision in deep endometriosis of the rectum using transanal staplers: a series of 111 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the postoperative outcomes of patients with rectal endometriosis managed by disc excision using transanal staplers. DESIGN: Prospective study using data recorded in the CIRENDO database (NCT02294825). SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): A total of 111 consecutive patients managed between June 2009 and June 2016. INTERVENTION(S): We performed rectal disc excision using two different transanal staplers: [1] the Contour Transtar stapler (the Rouen technique); and [2] the end to end anastomosis circular transanal stapler. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative digestive function was assessed using standardized gastrointestinal questionnaires: the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Questionnaire. RESULT(S): The two staplers were used in 42 (37.8%) and 69 patients (62.2%), respectively. The largest diameter of specimens achieved was significantly higher using the Rouen technique (mean ± SD, 59 ± 11 mm vs. 36 ± 7 mm), which was used to remove nodules located lower in the rectum (5.5 ± 1.3 cm vs. 9.7 ± 2.5 cm) infiltrating more frequently the adjacent posterior vaginal wall (83.3% vs. 49.3%). Associated nodules involving sigmoid colon were managed by distinct procedures, either disc excision (2.7%) or segmental resection of sigmoid colon (9.9%). Postoperative values for the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index increased 1 and 3 years after the surgery, but improvement in constipation was not significant. The probability of pregnancy at 1 year after the arrest of medical treatment was 73.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9%-88.9%), with a majority of spontaneous conceptions. CONCLUSION(S): Disc excision using transanal staplers is a valuable alternative to colorectal resection in selected patients presenting with rectal endometriosis, allowing for good preservation of rectal function.

Magnetic resonance imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply infiltrative endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To show characteristics of deeply infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and how they correlate with intraoperative findings. DESIGN: Overview of still and dynamic MRI images of four different patients with DIE. We then used videos from their surgeries to highlight the appearance of endometriosis corresponding to these images (educational video). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Four different patients with DIE were included in this video. These were all women of reproductive age who suffered from debilitating deeply infiltrative endometriosis. These patients had a pelvic MRI performed at our institution and subsequently underwent surgery with one of our minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. INTERVENTION(S): The MRI endometriosis protocol includes T1-weighted fat and nonfat saturated as well as T2-weighted sequences. Images are taken along all three planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) before and after contrast. What distinguishes the standard MRI from the endometriosis-protocol MRI is the thickness of the slices taken. For the evaluation of endometriosis, T1 nonfat saturated images are taken in 6-mm slices with no skip sections in between. Then, T1 fat saturated images and T2-weighted images are taken in 5-mm slices with a 1-mm skip section in between slices. The areas that are suspicious for lesions consistent with DIE are corroborated on videos taken during surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Value of accurate mapping of lesions with the use of preoperative MRI in surgical planning and complete resection of diseased tissue. RESULT(S): Results from a previously published prospective study by Bazot et al. reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 90.3%, 91%, 92.1%, and 89%, respectively. Similarly to our institution, that study used a 1.5-T MRI, and the protocol of our institution closely mimicked the technique used in that study. Another prospective study published by Hottat et al. showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI predicting intraoperative disease of 96.3%, 100%, 100%, and 93.3% respectively. Those results were gathered with the use of a 3.0-T MRI. The high accuracy in these studies of prediction of deep pelvic endometriosis in specific locations shows that MRI is effective for preoperative planning, as was the case for the four patients in our video. CONCLUSION(S): Preoperative planning for DIE with the use of MRI is integral in surgical planning. Other imaging modalities to diagnose DIE, such as transvaginal ultrasound, endoanal ultrasound, barium enema, cystoscopy, and rectoscopy, have all been used and studied for the evaluation of endometriosis. However, given its accuracy for mapping lesions, MRI could potentially replace multiple types of imaging while offering the best option for preoperative planning. Accurate mapping would result in greater success of resection and allow for multidisciplinary planning if necessary. Furthermore, being able to train the eye to identify lesions on MRI that are consistent with DIE is an asset to the gynecologic surgeon.