Applying the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary to the implementation of a physical activity coaching trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies show that physical inactivity is associated with worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite practice guidelines recommending regular physical activity (PA), there are no large-scale experimental studies to confirm that patients at high risk for COPD exacerbations can increase their PA and consequently, have improved outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this case study is to describe the use of a widely accepted pragmatic trials framework for the design and implementation of a pragmatic clinical trial (PCT) of PA coaching for COPD in a real-world setting. METHOD: The aim of the trial was to determine the effectiveness of a 12-month PA coaching intervention (Walk On!) compared to standard care for 2,707 patients at high risk for COPD exacerbations from a large integrated health care system. The descriptions of our implementation experiences are anchored within the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS-2) framework. DISCUSSION: Facilitators of PCT implementation include early and ongoing engagement and support of multiple stakeholders including patients, health system leaders, administrators, physician champions, and frontline clinicians, an organizational/setting that prioritizes positive lifestyle behaviors, and a flexible intervention that allows for individualization. Pragmatic challenges include reliance on electronic data that are not complete or available in real-time for patient identification, timing of outreach may not synchronize with patients' readiness for change, and high turnover of clinical staff drawn from the existing workforce. DISCUSSION: PRECIS-2 is a useful guide for organizing decisions about study designs and implementation approaches to help diverse stakeholders recognize the compromises between internal and external validity with those decisions.

Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance.

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have a reputation for being inherently difficult to deliver as planned and often face unforeseen challenges and delays, particularly in relation to organisational and governance difficulties, participant interest, constraints due to allocation of costs, local investigator interest and lengthy bureaucracy. Recruitment is often difficult and the challenges faced often impact on the cost and delivery of a successful trial within the funded period. This paper reflects upon the challenges faced in delivering a pragmatic RCT of weight loss maintenance in a community setting and suggests some potential solutions. METHODS: The weight loss maintenance in adults trial aimed to evaluate the impact of a 12 month, individually tailored weight maintenance intervention on BMI 3 years from randomisation. Participants were recruited primarily from participant identification centres (PICs)-GP surgeries, exercise on referral schemes and slimming world. The intervention was delivered in community settings. A recruitment strategy implementation plan was drafted to address and monitor poor recruitment. RESULTS: Delays in opening and recruitment were experienced early on. Some were beyond the control of the study team such as; disagreement over allocation of national health service costs and PIC classification as well as difficulties in securing support from research networks. That the intervention was delivered in community settings was often at the root of these issues. Key items to address at the design stage of future trials include feasibility of eligibility criteria. The most effective element of the recruitment implementation plan was to refocus sources of recruitment and target only those who could fulfil the eligibility criteria immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Learnings from this trial should be kept in mind by those designing similar studies in the future. Considering potential governance, cost and research network support implications at the design stage of pragmatic trials of any community-based complex intervention is paramount. The appropriateness and viability of inclusion criteria also require careful consideration as does use of a targeted advertising strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN35774128, 12/01/2010.