[Extensive transfixing skin necrosis after breast biopsy under local anesthesia: About four cases]. / Nécrose cutanée étendue transfixiante après biopsie mammaire sous anesthésie locale : rapport de quatre cas.

INTRODUCTION: Local anesthetics with adrenaline are widely used in routine practice and have long proven their benefits and safety. The rare complications due to their use mainly concern immuno-allergic and vascular mechanisms. DESCRIPTION: In this article, we present four similar cases of early transfixing skin necrosis occurring after radioguided breast biopsy under local anesthesia using epinephrine local anesthetics in the context of a diagnostic approach to breast cancer. DISCUSSION: Although the literature is comforting about the use of local anesthetics, even on the extremities, severe skin complications continue to be reported sporadically. The analysis and understanding of these phenomena would allow, in the long run, to avoid them and to reduce their importance. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of skin necrosis after breast biopsy under radiographic control is rare and seems to be related to the local anesthetic procedure. Although similar cases have been reported in the literature, it does not seem possible today to conclude on the exact physiopathology of these complications. A better knowledge of the pathophysiology of these complications would help to avoid their occurrence in the future.

A Patient with Known Allergy to Local Anesthesia Presenting for a Dental Restoration.

Dentists should be equipped to treat an allergic reaction in a dental office, and in this scenario, the potential allergic reaction is noted after administration of a common local anesthetic lidocaine with epinephrine. The allergic reaction quickly escalates to a full-blown anaphylaxis, and the management of such an episode is detailed in this article.

A Comparative Analysis of Local Anesthetics: Injection Associated Pain and Duration of Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthesia administration is frequently the most painful step of dermatologic surgery. Identification of an anesthetic that minimizes infiltration pain and toxicity while maximizing duration of action would improve both patient satisfaction and procedural safety. This study compared eight local anesthetic solutions to identify the composition that minimizes infiltration pain, maximizes duration of effect, and minimizes amount of local anesthetic needed. METHODS: In a double-blinded study, thirty subjects were injected with eight local anesthetic solutions of varied concentrations of lidocaine, epinephrine, benzyl alcohol, and sodium bicarbonate. Infiltration pain was rated by subjects using a visual analog scale and duration of anesthesia was assessed by needle prick sensation every 15 minutes. RESULTS: Solutions 2, 7, and 8, were significantly less painful (P<0.001), though not statistically different from each other. Two of the three solutions were buffered 10:1 with sodium bicarbonate. Additionally, two of the three contained notably decreased concentrations of lidocaine, 0.091% and 0.083%, than traditionally used in practice. The use of benzyl alcohol did not result in a reduction of reported pain. The duration of action was equal among the solutions regardless of anesthetic concentration. CONCLUSIONS: A solution of 0.091% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:1,100,000 and 0.82% benzyl alcohol reduces medication dose while ensuring maximum patient comfort and, theoretically, increases shelf life. While considered off-label, clinically effective dermal anesthesia may be obtained at a lower concentration of lidocaine and epinephrine than is commonly used, aiding conservative use of local anesthetic, particularly during times of national shortage. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.5183 Citation: Moses A, Klager S, Weinstein A, et al. A comparative analysis of local anesthetics: Injection associated pain and duration of anesthesia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):364-368. doi:10.36849/JDD.5183.

Iatrogenic central retinal artery occlusion following retrobulbar anesthesia with adrenaline for vitreoretinal surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We describe a patient presenting with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) of the right eye after retrobulbar anesthesia with adrenaline for macular pucker surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient, a 67-year-old Caucasian man, developed a CRAO postoperatively by the next-day control likely due to the retrobulbar injection of a combination of Xylocaine and Bupivacaine with adrenaline as anesthetic. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of adrenaline to the standard anesthetic solution could be a risk factor for serious complications, such as CRAO.

A Case of Wide QRS Tachycardia After the Local Administration of Epinephrine to Reduce Bleeding During General Anesthesia.

We report a case of wide QRS tachycardia or ventricular tachycardia with a pulse after the administration of epinephrine under general anesthesia. After induction and achieving a sufficiently deep plane of general anesthesia, gauze soaked in a 1:100,000 epinephrine solution was applied to the patient's nasal mucosa and 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered via intraoral infiltration. Several minutes after the start of surgery, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate suddenly increased and a wide QRS tachycardia was observed on the electrocardiogram, which then reverted to a normal sinus rhythm. According to the past reports, similar arrhythmias have occurred after administration of epinephrine in the head and neck. These findings suggest that anesthesia providers must be aware of the risks associated with epinephrine and local anesthetic use, particularly in the head and neck region.

Protective effect of valerian extract capsule (VEC) on ethanol- and indomethacin-induced gastric mucosa injury and ameliorative effect of VEC on gastrointestinal motility disorder.

CONTEXT: Valerian extract capsule (VEC) is an effective Chinese patent medicine used for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the detailed pharmacological activity for VEC clinical effects in GI diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: control, model, and drug-treated (VEC-L, VEC-M, VEC-H, and teprenone). Rats were orally administered VEC (124, 248, 496 mg/kg) and teprenone (21.43 mg/kg) for 3 consecutive days. After 1 h, the five groups (except the control group) were orally given ethanol (10 mL/kg) for 1 h or indomethacin (80 mg/kg) for 7 h. The spasmolytic activity of VEC (0.01-1 mg/mL) on ACh/BaCl2-induced New Zealand rabbit smooth muscle contraction was performed. The C57BL/6 mice carbon propelling test evaluated the effects of VEC (248-992 mg/kg) on intestinal motility in normal and neostigmine/adrenaline-induced mice. RESULTS: Compared with the model group, VEC treatment reduced the gastric lesion index and mucosal damage. Further experiments showed that the pathological ameliorative effect of VEC was accompanied by augmentation of the enzymatic antioxidant system and cytoprotective marker (COX-1, p < 0.01; PGI2 p < 0.05;), along with the alleviation of the levels of MPO (ethanol: 15.56 ± 0.82 vs. 12.15 ± 2.60, p < 0.01; indomethacin: 9.65 ± 3.06 vs. 6.36 ± 2.43, p < 0.05), MDA (ethanol: 1.66 ± 0.44 vs. 0.81 ± 0.58, p < 0.01; indomethacin: 1.71 ± 0.87 vs. 1.09 ± 0.43, p < 0.05), and inflammatory mediators. VEC decreased the high tone induced by ACh/BaCl2 and promoted intestinal transit in normal and neostigmine/adrenaline-induced mice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: VEC showed a potential gastroprotective effect, suggesting that VEC is a promising phytomedicine for the treatment of GI diseases.

Effects of Remifentanil on Cardiovascular Stimulation Caused by Local Anesthetic With Epinephrine: A Power Spectral Analysis.

The objectives of this research were to investigate (a) what was the most effective infusion rate of remifentanil and (b) the degree to which sympathomimetic effects were involved with cardiovascular stimulation by using a power spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). A total of 63 healthy individuals scheduled for sagittal split ramus osteotomy were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: remifentanil infusion rate of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 µg/kg/min. Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil and propofol. Before the surgical procedure, 2% lidocaine containing 12.5 µg/mL epinephrine was administered in the surgical field for local anesthesia. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components in HRV power spectral analysis, and the LF/HF ratio were analyzed. Increases in SBP and HR were observed after local anesthesia in all 3 groups, but no significant differences were observed between the groups. Remifentanil infusion at 0.1 µg/kg/min may be appropriate to minimize cardiovascular stimulation caused by exogenous epinephrine from local anesthesia. Although a rise in the LF/HF ratio was observed after local anesthesia in all groups, no relationship was observed between the cardiovascular changes and the increase in LF/HF ratio. This suggests that sympathomimetic effects are involved to a lesser extent with the cardiovascular stimulation caused by exogenous epinephrine.

High Volume Liposuction in Tumescence Anesthesia in Lipedema Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lipedema is a chronic, progressive disease that occurs almost exclusively in women and leads to pathological, painful fat growths at the extremities. Only symptomatic therapy can be offered since the etiology of the disease has not yet been clarified. Liposuction in tumescent anesthesia has established itself as a surgical treatment method of choice. The complication rate associated with the procedure and the pharmacological course and safety of treatment in patients with lipedema has not yet been sufficiently studied. The aim of the study was to broaden the evidence on the safety of ambulatory high-volume liposuction in tumescent anesthesia in lipedema patients. Influencing factors of patients (weight, fat content, comorbidities) or the process technique (drug administration, volume of aspirates) should be investigated on the safety and risks of tumescent anesthesia. This was a retrospective data analysis in which data from 27 patients (40 liposuction procedures) treated at the Sandhofer and Barsch lipedema center between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated. The liposuctions were carried out in tumescent anesthesia and using a Power-Assisted Liposuction system. Clinical examinations and regular blood samples were carried out before the procedure, intra- and postoperatively. The procedures lasted an average of 118 minutes and an average of 6111 ml of aspirate was removed. For tumescent anesthesia, patients were given an average lidocaine dose of 34.23 mg/kg body weight and an epinephrine dose of 0.11 mg/kg body weight. No relevant complications associated with drug side effects, hypovolemia or hypervolemia or blood loss were detected. Liposuction under high volume tumescent anesthesia for the treatment of lipedema patients is, even for major intervention, a safe procedure. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(3):326-334. doi:10.36849/JDD.5828.

Increase in early wound leakage in total knee arthroplasty with local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) that includes epinephrine: a retrospective cohort study.

Background and purpose - After introducing a new local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) protocol with addition of 30 mL ropivacaine 2% and 1 mg epinephrine, we noted an increase in early wound leakage. As wound leakage is associated with prosthetic joint infection, our department aims to minimize postoperative wound leakage. This study evaluates the incidence of early wound leakage and postoperative pain after knee arthroplasty (KA) following adjustment of the LIA protocol with addition of 30 cc ropivacaine 2% and 1 mg epinephrine. Patients and methods - In this retrospective medical dossier study all patients (n = 502) undergoing a primary total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty between January 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019 were included. Patients received an LIA protocol containing 120 mL 2 mg/mL ropivacaine (ROPI- group; n = 256). After October 30, patients received an LIA protocol containing 150 mL 2 mg/mL ropivacaine with 1 mg epinephrine in the first 100 mL (ROPI + group; n = 246). The primary outcome measure was early wound leakage (< 72 hours postoperatively), defined as wound fluid leaking past the barrier of the wound dressing. Secondary outcome measure, 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) pain (< 72 hours postoperatively) was also assessed. Data was evaluated using logistic regression. Results - The incidence of wound leakage was higher in the ROPI + group: 24% versus 17% in the ROPI- group (p = 0.06). After adjusting for the differences between surgeons the relative risk of this increase was 1.4 (1.0-2.0). The ROPI + and ROPI- group were similar regarding postoperative pain assessment. Interpretation - Adjustment of the LIA protocol with 30 mL 2% ropivacaine and 1 mg epinephrine led to an increase in early wound leakage in knee arthroplasty but no difference in pain scores.

Wide-Awake Surgery With Local Anesthesia and Epinephrine Is Safe.

Hand and upper extremity surgery performed with the patient wide awake involves the use of a local anesthetic and epinephrine. Controversy persists as to whether epinephrine is safe for use in the hand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety of epinephrine in hand and upper extremity surgery. The hypothesis was that epinephrine is safe and can be used for a wide breadth of surgical procedures of the hand and upper extremity. A 4-year retrospective chart review was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing wide-awake surgery performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. All procedures were performed with local anesthesia and epinephrine. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure volume, procedure type, surgical setting, and complications related to epinephrine use. During the study period, 4054 consecutive patients underwent 4287 wide-awake procedures with local anesthesia and epinephrine. Average patient age was 59 years, and 64% of patients were female. No complications occurred as a result of the use of epinephrine, and no tissue necrosis, phentolamine reversal, anaphylaxis, or readmissions occurred. No patients required conversion to general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. This analysis of more than 4000 consecutive patients undergoing wide-awake hand and upper extremity surgery with epinephrine confirmed that epinephrine use is safe, with no reported cases of tissue necrosis, reversal, readmission, anaphylaxis, or anesthetic conversion. Epinephrine is safe for use in the hand and upper extremity for patients undergoing wide-awake hand surgery with a local anesthetic. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e529-e532.].

Keeping the Finger on the Pulse: Cardiac Arrhythmias in Hand Surgery Using Local Anesthesia with Adrenaline.

BACKGROUND: The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in hand surgery is gaining popularity. The authors aimed to prospectively analyze the frequency and type of arrhythmias in patients undergoing hand surgery under local anesthesia and to examine whether the addition of adrenaline affects their incidence. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing hand surgery under local anesthesia were randomized into two groups: group 1, local anesthesia with lidocaine and tourniquet; and group 2, local anesthesia with lidocaine and adrenaline (WALANT). Patients with a history of arrhythmias were excluded. Patients were connected to Holter electrocardiographic monitoring before surgery and up until discharge. The records were blindly compared between the groups regarding types of arrhythmias, and frequency and timing relative to injection and tourniquet inflation. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were included between August of 2018 and August of 2019 (age, 59.7 ± 13.6 years; 71 percent women; 51 in each group). No major arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation) or arrhythmia-related symptoms were recorded for either group. Minor arrhythmias (including atrial premature beats, ventricular premature beats, and atrial tachycardia) were recorded in 68 patients (66.6 percent), with no statistical difference between the groups. There were three patients with minor arrhythmias during inflation of the tourniquet. Patients in the adrenaline group had 2 percent sinus tachycardia during injection and 4 percent asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias. These findings do not require any further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results show that hand operations using WALANT technique in patients with no history of arrhythmia are safe and are not arrhythmogenic; therefore, there is no need for routine perioperative continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

A case of transient diplopia and ophthalmoplegia following dental anesthesia.

Dental anesthesia is one of the most frequently performed medical procedures. Although the frequency of ocular complications is extremely low, these reactions can be highly alarming and may bring up medicolegal issues when they do occur. Dentists and oral surgeons should be well-informed of these adverse reactions and should be aware that both ophthalmologists and emergency physicians might be required to care for these patients.

Wide-Awake Surgical Management of Hand Fractures: Technical Pearls and Advanced Rehabilitation.

Most unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures for which operative treatment is indicated can be reduced and stabilized with either open or closed techniques using local anesthetic with epinephrine instead of intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. With the patient wide-awake during surgery, the hand can be taken through active range of motion to assess fracture stability. In this article, the authors review the rationale and technique for wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet surgery in the treatment of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures and impart pearls to optimize the patient experience and illustrate common fixation techniques using percutaneous Kirschner wires. The intraoperative assessment of fracture stability permits an accelerated, protected-range-of-motion protocol that minimizes postoperative stiffness and facilitates expedient recovery.

Onset Time of Local Anesthesia After Single Injection in Toe Nerve Blocks: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

PURPOSE: The study was conducted to investigate the onset time and safety profile of four different local anesthetic solutions. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial study. METHODS: One hundred twelve healthy volunteers were assigned to receive digital block on their second toe. Individuals were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: lidocaine 2%, lidocaine 2% with epinephrine, bupivacaine 0.5%, or bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine. Onset time was measured until detecting the absence of pinprick sensation. Oxygen saturation was measured in the infiltrated toe up to 60 minutes. FINDINGS: The subjects in the groups of anesthetics with epinephrine had a significantly lower mean onset time. There were no significant differences regarding oxygen saturation between the groups and no adverse effects were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anesthetics with epinephrine can be an effective form of local anesthetic for digital blocks when a rapid onset of action, prolonged duration of anesthesia, and vasoconstrictive action are required.

Arrhythmia induction using isoproterenol or epinephrine during electrophysiology study for supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiology study (EPS) is an important part of the diagnosis and workup for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Provocative medications are used to induce arrhythmias, when they are not inducible at baseline. The most common medication is the ß1-specific agonist, isoproterenol, but recent price increases have resulted in a shift toward the nonspecific agonist, epinephrine. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that isoproterenol is a better induction agent for SVT during EPS than epinephrine. METHODS: We created a retrospective cohort of 131 patients, who underwent EPS and required medication infusion with either isoproterenol or epinephrine for SVT induction. The primary outcome was arrhythmia induction. RESULTS: Successful induction was achieved in 71% of isoproterenol cases and 53% of epinephrine cases (P = 0.020). Isoproterenol was significantly better than epinephrine for SVT induction during EPS (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-4.85; P = 0.021). There was no difference in baseline variables or complications between the two groups. Other variables associated with successful arrhythmia induction included a longer procedure duration and atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia as the clinical arrhythmia. In a multivariable model, isoproterenol remained significantly associated with successful induction (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.002-6.59; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Isoproterenol was significantly better than epinephrine for SVT arrhythmia induction. However, epinephrine was safe and successfully induced arrhythmias in the majority of patients who received it. Furthermore, when atropine was added in epinephrine-refractory cases, in a post hoc analysis there was no difference in arrhythmia induction between medications. Cost savings could thus be significant without compromising safety.

Use of Epinephrine in Patients with Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: An Analysis of the Beijing Pharmacovigilance Database.

BACKGROUND: Few studies assessing the use of epinephrine in drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) in the hospital setting are available. We utilized the Beijing Pharmacovigilance Database (BPD) to evaluate the appropriateness of epinephrine for DIA management. METHODS: DIA cases collected in the BPD from January 2004 to December 2014 were adjudicated and analyzed for demographics, causative drugs, clinical signs, outcomes, initial treatment, route, dosing, and cardiovascular adverse events (CAE) of epinephrine. RESULTS: DIA was primarily caused by antibiotics (38.4%), radiocontrast agents (11.9%), traditional Chinese medicine injections (10.9%), and chemotherapeutic drugs (10.3%). Only 708 (59.5%) patients received epinephrine treatment. Patients who received epinephrine were more likely to experience wheezing (p < 0.001) and respiratory arrest (p < 0.001). Among 518 patients with a complete record of the epinephrine administration route, the percentage of patients receiving it by intramuscular (IM) injection, subcutaneous (SC) injection, intravenous (IV) bolus injection, or IV continuous infusion was 16.9, 31.5, 43.5, and 8.1%, respectively. Among the 427 patients with a record of both the administration route and the dosing, an overdose was more likely with IV bolus (94.1%) in contrast to IM injection (56.6%; p < 0.001) or SC injection (43.7%; p < 0.001). Among the patients analyzed for CAE (n = 349), 17 patients accounted for 19 CAE, and 13 (76.5%) of these patients were overdosed with epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Underuse, inappropriate IV bolus use, and overdosing were the 3 major problems with epinephrine use in DIA in China. Educational training for health care professionals on the appropriate use of epinephrine in managing anaphylactic reactions is suggested.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial.

BACKGROUND: The most commonly impacted tooth is the third molar. An impacted third molar can ultimately cause acute pain, infection, tumors, cysts, caries, periodontal disease, and loss of adjacent teeth. Local anesthesia is employed for removing the third molar. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine for surgical extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy participants underwent surgical extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars in 2 separate visits while under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine with different epinephrine concentration (1:80,000 or 1:200,000) in a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. Visual analog scale pain scores obtained immediately after surgical extraction were primarily evaluated for the 2 groups receiving different epinephrine concentrations. Visual analog scale pain scores were obtained 2, 4, and 6 hours after administering an anesthetic. Onset and duration of analgesia, onset of pain, intraoperative bleeding, operator's and participant's overall satisfaction, drug dosage, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated for the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in any measurements except hemodynamic factors (P >.05). Changes in systolic blood pressure and heart rate following anesthetic administration were significantly greater in the group receiving 1:80,000 epinephrine than in that receiving 1:200,000 epinephrine (P ≤.01). CONCLUSION: The difference in epinephrine concentration between 1:80,000 and 1:200,000 in 2% lidocaine liquid does not affect the medical efficacy of the anesthetic. Furthermore, 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine has better safety with regard to hemodynamic parameters than 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Therefore, we suggest using 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine rather than 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars in hemodynamically unstable patients.