Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM): Best Practices for Drug Product Quality, Regulatory and Industry Perspectives: 2023 Workshop Summary Report.

Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is used to elevate drug product quality by providing a more accurate and holistic understanding of how drugs interact with the human body. These models are based on the integration of physiological, pharmacological, and pharmaceutical data to simulate and predict drug behavior in vivo. Effective utilization of PBBM requires a consistent approach to model development, verification, validation, and application. Currently, only one country has a draft guidance document for PBBM, whereas other major regulatory authorities have had limited experience with the review of PBBM. To address this gap, industry submitted confidential PBBM case studies to be reviewed by the regulatory agencies; software companies committed to training. PBBM cases were independently and collaboratively discussed by regulators, and academic colleagues participated in some of the discussions. Successful bioequivalence "safe space" industry case examples are also presented. Overall, six regulatory agencies were involved in the case study exercises, including ANVISA, FDA, Health Canada, MHRA, PMDA, and EMA (experts from Belgium, Germany, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden), and we believe this is the first time such a collaboration has taken place. The outcomes were presented at this workshop, together with a participant survey on the utility and experience with PBBM submissions, to discuss the best scientific practices for developing, validating, and applying PBBMs. The PBBM case studies enabled industry to receive constructive feedback from global regulators and highlighted clear direction for future PBBM submissions for regulatory consideration.

Integrating chemical similarity and bioequivalence: an overall evaluation of the quality consistency of traditional decoction and dispensing granule decoction of Amomum villosum.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the quality consistency between traditional decoction (TD) of Amomum villosum and its dispensing granule decoction (DGD). Fifteen batches of TD and nine batches of dispensing granules (manufactured by A, B, and C) were prepared and evaluated for their consistency. METHODS: Firstly, The chemical similarity of TD and DGD was examined using GC and HPLC, coupled with hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), criteria importance though intercrieria correlation(CRITIC) weighting method, and principal component analysis (PCA). Secondly, the gastrointestinal motility experiments in mice, along with the CRITIC weighting method, were employed to assess the bioequivalence of TD and DGD of Amomum villosum. Finally, the entropy weight technique-gray relative analysis(GRA) method was used to compare the quality of Amomum villosum decoctions. RESULTS: ①The CRITIC weighting method indicated significantly higher scores for TD than DGD (p < 0.01). HCA and PCA results demonstrated a clear distinction between TD and DGD. ②Gastrointestinal motility test results revealed no significant difference between TD and DGD in other indicators (p > 0.05).③Gray relative analysis results showed that the relative correlation of TD was more significant than that of DGD. CONCLUSION: The chemical composition of DGD and TD differed. The biological activity of DGD-A/B was consistent with that of TD, while the difference between DGD-C and TD was significant. A comprehensive evaluation showed that TD exhibited better quality than DGD. DGD manufacturers should optimize the preparation process to enhance product quality.

Bioequivalence of Levocetirizine Hydrochloride Granules (Kangzhitai) in Healthy Subjects.

Objective: Levocetirizine hydrochloride is the R-enantiomer of cetirizine, which is a new-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist with high safety, selectivity, and affinity. As a high-efficiency non-sedating antihistamine, levocetirizine hydrochloride has been widely used in the clinical treatment of skin, respiratory, and eye allergies. However, the bioavailability of levocetirizine hydrochloride granules remains to be determined. The study examined the relative bioavailability of the test drug (levocetirizine hydrochloride granules (Kangzhitai®)) and determined whether Kangzhitai® was bioequivalent to the reference drug (levocetirizine (Xyzal®)) in healthy individuals. Methods: Twenty eligible healthy male subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group one received 5 mg of Kangzhitai®, followed by a 10-day wash-out period and 5 mg of Xyzal® on day 11. Group two received the same doses but in a reverse sequence. The subjects fasted for 12 h, and blood samples were collected before (blank) and after administration. The plasma concentration of Kangzhitai® was determined by HPLC-MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using DAS 2.0 software. Results: The main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, AUC0-48, and AUC0-∞ of the Xyzal® and Kangzhitai® groups were as follows: (218.4 ± 46.4) µg/L vs. (213.6 ± 39.3) µg/L, (0.73 ± 0.32)/h vs. (0.75±0.3)/h, (9.2 ± 2.0) h vs. (8.9 ± 2.7) h, (1594.0 ± 337.2) µg·h/L vs. (1652.6 ± 383.5) µg·h/L, and (1683.2 ± 338.5) µg·h/L vs. (1753.7 ± 445.4) µg·h/L. The two-one-sided t tests of Cmax, AUC0-48, and AUC0-∞ showed that th and t1 were both higher than one-sided t0.05. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for AUC0-48 and AUC0-∞ of Kangzhitai® did not exceed 80%-125% of AUC0-48 and AUC0-∞ of Xyzal®. The 90% CI for the Cmax of Kangzhitai® did not exceed 70%-143% of the Cmax of Xyzal®. There was no significant difference in Tmax between the two drugs. The relative bioavailability (F, assessed by AUC0-48) of Kangzhitai® vs. Xyzal® was 104.4±18.5%. No adverse events occurred during the drug administration. Conclusion: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in absorption between Kangzhitai® and Xyzal®, which confirmed the bioequivalence of the two drugs.

Quality consistency evaluation between dispensing granules and traditional decoction of Gardeniae Fructus based on chemical similarity and bioequivalence.

Dispensing granules of Chinese herbal medicines are gaining more and more recognition. Despite this, how to evaluate the quality consistency between traditional decoction and its corresponding dispensing granules is a challenging task. In this work, we attempted to propose a comprehensive strategy through in vitro and in vivo comparisons to overcome this challenge, taking Gardeniae Fructus as a typical case. On one hand, HPLC fingerprinting and multi-component quantification were performed to evaluate chemical similarity. On the other hand, pharmacokinetic profiling was conducted to estimate bioequivalence in terms of concentration-time curve and key pharmacokinetic parameters. The in vitro and in vivo comparison results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between these two dosage forms. This proposed strategy is applicable not only for quality consistency evaluation between dispensing granules and traditional decoction but also for broader application scenarios.

Bioequivalence of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids from foods enriched with a novel vegetable-based omega-3 delivery system compared to gel capsules: a randomized controlled cross-over acute trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate bioavailability of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFA) from foods enriched with novel vegetable-based encapsulated algal oil across Australian and Singaporean populations. METHODS: 27 men (n = 12 Australian European; n = 15 Singaporean Chinese), 21-50 yr; 18-27.5 kg/m2, with low habitual intake of omega-3 LCPUFA completed a multicentre randomised controlled acute 3-way cross-over single-blind trial. They consumed, in random order 1-week apart after an overnight fast, standard breakfast meals including 400 mg docosahexanoic acid (DHA) from either extruded rice snacks or soup both containing cauliflower-encapsulated HiDHA® algal oil or gel capsules containing HiDHA® algal oil. Blood samples for analysis of plasma DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) were taken pre-meal and after 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h. Primary analyses comparing 24-h incremental area under the plasma DHA, EPA and DHA + EPA concentration (µg/ml) curves (iAUC0-24 h) between test foods were performed using linear mixed models by including ethnicity as an interaction term. RESULTS: Plasma iAUC0-24 h did not differ significantly between test foods (adjusted mean [95% CI] plasma DHA + EPA: extruded rice snack, 8391 [5550, 11233] µg/mL*hour; soup, 8862 [6021, 11704] µg/mL*hour; capsules, 11,068 [8226, 13910] µg/mL*hour, P = 0.31) and did not differ significantly between Australian European and Singaporean Chinese (treatment*ethnicity interaction, P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The vegetable-based omega-3 LCPUFA delivery system did not affect bioavailability of omega-3 LCPUFA in healthy young Australian and Singaporean men as assessed after a single meal over 24 h, nor was bioavailability affected by ethnicity. This novel delivery system may be an effective way to fortify foods/beverages with omega-3 LCPUFA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04610983), date of registration, 22 November 2020.

Comparative Bioavailability Study of a New Vitamin D3 Orodispersible Film Versus a Marketed Oral Solution in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of vitamin D3 that dissolves rapidly in the mouth without drinking or chewing may be a worthwhile alternative to currently available drug products for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation. This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of a single dose of a vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF with those of a marketed oral vitamin D3 preparation in healthy subjects. METHODS: This Phase 1, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study compared the pharmacokinetics of calcifediol [25(OH)D3], the precursor of bioactive vitamin D3, after a single dose of a new vitamin D3 25,000 I.U. ODF with those of a Reference formulation (vitamin D3 25000 I.U./2.5 mL oral solution) in healthy adult subjects using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The primary objective was bioavailability under fed conditions, defined as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 25(OH)D3 and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). The pharmacokinetics of 25(OH)D3 were also evaluated following the ODF administration under fasting conditions. Subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of the vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF or the Reference oral solution under fed conditions or the vitamin D3 ODF under fasting conditions. RESULTS: Forty-eight healthy subjects were randomised and completed the study. Overall, the pharmacokinetic profile was very similar across the three treatment groups, and bioavailability did not significantly differ among treatments. Under fed conditions, mean 25(OH)D3 plasma values for Cmax were 6.68 ± 2.03 versus 6.61 ± 2.62 ng/mL for the Test versus Reference formulations. Corresponding values for AUC0-t were 2364.80 ± 1336.97 versus 2150.52 ± 1622.76 ng/mL × h. Mean Cmax was slightly lower (6.68 ± 2.03 vs 7.23 ± 1.48 ng/mL) and the time to reach peak concentration was delayed (144 h [36-312] versus 42 h (2-480]) with the ODF under fed versus fasting conditions (p = 0.0371). The point estimates and 90 % CIs of the Testfed/Referencefed ratios of the geometric means showed that the bioavailability of exogenous 25(OH)D3 was, both in rate and extent of absorption, slightly higher with the vitamin D3 ODF than the vitamin D3 oral solution under the administration conditions recommended for the vitamin D3 oral solution. Palatability and ease of use of the ODF were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The new ODF 25000 I.U. formulation provided a valuable alternative to the marketed oral solution for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation, with a bioavailability that was slightly higher than that of the vitamin D3 oral solution administered under the same conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN Registry (Registry code: ISRCTN13208948) on 27 November 2020.

Rectal Administration of Ibuprofen: Comparison of Enema and Suppository Form.

Ibuprofen is a widely used and well-tolerated analgesic and antipyretic. It is desirable to have a formulation with a rapid rate of absorption because it is required for rapid pain relief and temperature reduction. Previous studies have described the pharmacokinetic profiles of ibuprofen suppository and the mean peak times of ibuprofen suppository were around 1.8 hours, indicating a slower rate of absorption. The aim of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of rectal administration of ibuprofen between enema and suppository form in order to provide evidence for the faster absorption rates of ibuprofen enema. This study was a phase-1 clinical study, open-label, randomized and two-way crossover with one-week washout period comparing the absorption profile of equal dose of ibuprofen administered rectally in two treatment phases: ibuprofen suppository and enema. Blood samples were collected post dose for pharmacokinetic analyses. Tmax was analyzed using a Wilcoxon matched paired test. A standard ANOVA model, appropriate for bioequivalence studies was used and ratios of 90% confidence intervals were calculated. This study showed that Tmax for ibuprofen enema was less than half that of ibuprofen suppository (median 40 min vs. 90 min, respectively; p-value=0.0003). Cmax and AUC0-12 for ibuprofen enema were bioequivalent to ibuprofen suppository, as the ratio of test/reference=104.52%, 90% CI 93.41-116.95% and the ratio of test/reference=98.12%, 90%CI 93.34-103.16%, respectively, which fell within 80-125% bioequivalence limit. The overall extent of absorption was similar to the both, which were all well tolerated. In terms of Tmax, Ibuprofen enema was absorbed twice as quickly as from ibuprofen suppository. Therefore it is expected that an ibuprofen enema may provide faster onset of analgesic and antipyretic benefit.

Bioequivalence assessment of pharmaceutical aerosol products through IVIVC.

Many pharmaceutical developers of generic orally inhaled products (OIPs) are facing significant issues in passing the regulatory requirement to show pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) to the originator product. The core of the issue is that no reliable in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is available to guide their development. In this paper, several issues are identified and means to improve the data used for developing an IVIVC are discussed. The article also presents an "IVIVC-free" approach for developing a formulation matching the originator's PK performance.

Bioequivalence of a Generic Nateglinide Formulation in Healthy Chinese Volunteers under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Double-Cycle, Double-Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Nateglinide or N-(trans-4-isopropylcyclohexyl-1-carbonyl)-D-phenylalanine is a drug with a rapid hypoglycemic effect that is mainly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Very few studies have assessed bioequivalence based on feeding status. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence and safety of nateglinide-containing tablets (0.12 g) in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. METHODS: The studies were performed in 2017-2018 in the Phase I Clinical Trial Ward of the Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China. Eligible Chinese volunteers received a single 0.12-g dose of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 7-day washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Blood samples were collected at various time intervals, and plasma nateglinide concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Then, the adverse events, laboratory test results, vital signs, and physical exam findings were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The ratios of the geometric means of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf of the tested to reference preparations under fasting conditions were 105.03% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 99.53-110.83%), 104.02% (90% CI: 101.37-106.74%), and 104.04% (90% CI: 101.38-106.77%), respectively. The same ratios under fed conditions were 96.55% (90% CI: 85.80-108.65%), 103.08% (90% CI: 100.07-106.18%), and 103.07% (90% CI: 100.21-106.01%), respectively. The 90% CI values for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf fell within the accepted range of bioequivalence (80.00-125.0%). Common adverse events included hypoglycemia, heart rate increase, palpitation, sweating, dizziness, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: The test formulation (0.12 g) met the CFDA's regulatory definition for bioequivalence to the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated by healthy Chinese subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical trial registry (ChiCTR2000030694), March 10, 2020.

Genistein as a dietary supplement; formulation, analysis and pharmacokinetics study.

The objective of this study is to improve and optimize the formulation of Genistein in capsules in order to result in a better pharmacokinetic profile comparing to existing commercial products. In order to do this, five different formulations of Genistein capsules were developed and examined by reviewing their disintegration and dissolution properties. Furthermore, flowability of the powder along with potent incompatibilities between Genistein and its excipients were monitored through their thermal properties. The final formulation of Genistein was quantified using HPLC analysis and then its stability was evaluated thoroughly in real time and accelerated conditions. Finally, with the target to have a product with actual results, in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. The final product proved to have better results in disintegration and dissolution. Moreover, R.G.C.C.'s capsules exhibited enhanced action in human cell lines as well as impressive pharmacokinetic results in animal models. The in vitro results showed an advantage of the R.G.C.C. product compared to the commercial one, whereas its maximum concertation in vivo was determined 34% higher than the commercial one.

Screening of hypolipidemic active components in Jiang-Zhi-Ning and its preliminary mechanism research based on "active contribution value" study.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Jiang-Zhi-Ning (JZN) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula, which has the effect of lowering blood lipid level and softening blood vessels. It is clinically used in the treatment of hyperlipidemia with significant curative effect. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to screen the active components of JZN that are responsible for its blood lipids lowering effect and lay the foundation for elucidating pharmacodynamic material basis of the hypolipidemic effect of the formula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hyperlipidemia model was used to evaluate the efficacy of the JZN effective extraction with the TC and TG of rat plasma as evaluation index. Then the established ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MSn) method was utilized to analyze the components of JZN effective extraction and the absorbed components in rat plasma, the potential active components were screened by using the combined analysis results of in vivo and in vitro component identification. Then an established ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-QqQ-MSn) method was used to determine the content of potential active components and its natural ratio in JZN effective extraction, and a potential active components combination (PACC) was formed accordingly. Then a HepG2 cell hyperlipidemia model induced by sodium oleate was used to study the hypolipidemic activity of PACC by detecting the content of TG level in the model. Meanwhile, the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to conduct preliminary research on its hypolipidemic mechanism. Then combined with the concept of "combination index" in the "median-effect principle", to calculate the half inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of PACC and each monomer component on inhibiting the TG level in the cell model. Subsequently, the "activity contribution study" was carried out, and the components with the sum of the "activity contribution value" of 85% were finally selected as the hypolipidemic active components of JZN. RESULTS: The pharmacodynamics results showed that JZN effective extraction has displayed a good hypolipidemic effect. 45 components were identified in vitro, 108 components were identified from rat plasma, and 17 potential active components were screened out. The content determination result showed that the ratio of each potential active components in PACC as following: cassiaside C: rubrofusarin-6-O-gentiobioside: aurantio-obtusin-6-O-glucoside: hyperoside: isoquercitrin: quercetin-3-O-glucuronide: (E)-2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-glucoside: rutin: emodin-8-O-glucoside: astragalin: armepavine: N-nornuciferine: coclaurine: O-nornuciferine: nuciferine: N-norarmepavine: higenamine = 3.30: 16.06: 9.15: 23.94: 98.40: 417.45: 189.68: 8.62: 1.28: 5: 3.51: 14.57: 1.06: 1.35: 1: 5.64: 6.06, and the activity study results showed that it has displayed a good hypolipidemic activity. Finally, the hypolipidemic active components screened out by the "activity contribution study" were: quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, (E)-2,3,5,4'-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-glucoside, isoquercitrin, O-nornuciferine, hyperoside and rubrofusarin-6-O-gentiobioside. CONCLUSIONS: A scientific and rational approach of screening the hypolipidemic active ingredients of JZN has been developed in the current study. In addition, the research revealed the blood lipid lowering mechanism of those ingredients, which provide a solid basis for further elucidating the hypolipidemic pharmacodynamic material basis and action mechanism of JZN.

Important considerations for drugs, nutritional, and herbal supplements in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

Pediatric transplant recipients are on multiple prescription and non-prescription drugs. Many patients also use dietary, nutritional, and herbal supplements. This manuscript researched formulations of immunosuppressive drugs currently available and presents information on generic immunosuppressive drugs, commonly used non-prescription medications, dietary supplements, and herbal supplements. Immunosuppressive drugs are available in various formulations. Not all formulations are interchangeable. A number of FDA-approved generic formulations are available commercially in the United States. Generally generic formulations produce similar blood concentration vs time profiles compared to brand name products in adults and are considered to be bioequivalent. NSAID should be avoided in transplant patients due to potential drug interactions and increased risk associated with NSAID use; and appropriate doses of acetaminophen should be used for treatment of pain. Over-the-counter medications, such as guaifenesin and dextromethorphan, antihistamine medications, including diphenhydramine, loratadine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine, can be safely used in pediatric solid organ transplant population. Many safe and effective over-the-counter options exist for stool softening and as laxative. Diarrhea can lead to an increase in calcineurin inhibitor levels. Food can alter the absorption of immunosuppressive drugs. Several herbal products can alter immune status of the patients or alter the blood concentration of immunosuppressive drugs or may produce renal or hepatic toxicities and should be avoided in pediatric transplant recipients. It is important to educate pediatric transplant recipients and their families about not only immunosuppressive drug therapy but also about non-prescription drugs, dietary, and herbal supplement use.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Oral Absorption, pH, and Food Effect in Healthy Volunteers to Drive Alpelisib Formulation Selection.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) human model for alpelisib, an oral α-specific class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, was established to simulate oral absorption and plasma pharmacokinetics of healthy subjects to allow model-informed drug development. The GastroPlus™ model consisted of an advanced absorption gut model, which was linked to a 2-compartmental model. Systemic clearance and volume of distribution were estimated using population pharmacokinetics (popPK). Various food effect and pH-mediated absorption drug-drug interaction (DDI) scenarios were modeled. In fasted healthy subjects, simulated absorption was lower (ca. 70% for a 300-mg dose) due to pH and bile acid concentration-dependent solubility. Ranitidine showed a significant pH-mediated DDI effect only in the fasted but not fed state. The PBPK model identified that more drug is absorbed in the fed state, and alpelisib intestinal permeability is rate limiting to systemic exposure. Simulations for healthy subject showed a positive food effect with ca. 2-fold increase in plasma Cmax and 1.5-fold increase in AUC0-inf with a meal compared with fasted conditions. The PBPK model was verified using clinical food effect data with pivotal clinical formulation (PCF) and then applied to predict the performance of a commercial formulation (CF) in healthy volunteers. The model successfully predicted the outcome of a clinical bioequivalence study for PCF and CF with included in vitro dissolution data, both fasted and fed state. Estimated predictive errors (based on plasma Cmax, AUC0-t) were equal or below 30%. The alpelisib model for healthy subjects enables future bioequivalence formulation assessments, in fasted, fed, or altered pH conditions. Graphical Abstract.

Efficacy of generic meropenem products in combination with colistin in carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae experimental osteomyelitis.

Guidelines for the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections recommend a combination of two active agents, including meropenem if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤8 mg/L. The therapeutic equivalence of meropenem generics has been challenged. We compared the bactericidal activity of meropenem innovator (AstraZeneca) and four generic products (Actavis, Kabi, Mylan and Panpharma), both in vitro and in vivo, in association with colistin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed at 4 × MIC. An experimental model of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of a sclerosing agent followed by 2 × 108 CFU of K. pneumoniae KPC-99YC (meropenem MIC = 4 mg/L; colistin MIC = 1 mg/L). At 14 days after inoculation, treatment for 7 days started in seven groups of ≥10 rabbits, including a control group, a colistin group, and one group for each meropenem product (i.e. the innovator and four generics), in combination with colistin. In vitro, meropenem + colistin was bactericidal with no viable bacteria after 6 h, and this effect was similar with all meropenem products. In the osteomyelitis model, there was no significant difference between meropenem generics and the innovator when combined with colistin. Colistin-resistant strains were detected after treatment with colistin + meropenem innovator (n = 3) and generics (n = 3). The efficacy of four meropenem generics did not differ from the innovator in vitro and in an experimental rabbit model of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae osteomyelitis in terms of bactericidal activity and the emergence of resistance.

Network Pharmacology and Bioactive Equivalence Assessment Integrated Strategy Driven Q-markers Discovery for Da-Cheng-Qi Decoction to Attenuate Intestinal Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal obstruction (IO) is a kind of acute abdomen with high morbidity and mortality. Patients suffer from poor quality of life and tremendous financial pressure. Da-Cheng-Qi decoction (DCQD), a classical purgation prescription, has clinically been proven to be an effective treatment for IO. PURPOSE: Network pharmacology integrated with bioactive equivalence assessment was used to discover the quality marker (Q-marker) of DCQD against IO. METHODS: As there is hardly any targets recorded in database, thus the collection of IO targets was conducted by searching those of alternative diseases which have similar pathological symptoms with IO. In order to improve the reliability of the obtained targets, IO metabolomics data was introduced. Active compounds combination (ACC) was focused as potential Q-markers via component-target network analysis and function query from the identified components corresponding to the common targets. Bioequivalence between ACC and DCQD was assessed from the aspects of intestine motility (somatostatin secretion), inflammation (IL-6 secretion) and injury (wound healing assay) in vitro and was further validated in ileus rat model. PPI network analysis of core targets followed by gene pedigree classification and experimental validation confirmed the potential intervention pathway. RESULTS: A combination of 11 ingredients, including emodin, physcion, aloe-emodin, rhein, chrysophanol, gallic acid, magnolol, honokiol, naringenin, tangeretin, and nobiletin was finally confirmed bioequivalence with DQCD to some extent and could serve as Q-markers for DCQD to attenuate IO. PI3K/AKT was verified as a possible affected pathway that DCQD exerted the effectiveness against IO. CONCLUSION: For the disease with few recorded targets, searching those of alternative diseases which have similar pathological symptoms could be a feasible and effective approach. The proposed network pharmacology integrated bioactive equivalence evaluation paradigm is efficient to discover Q-marker of herbal formulae.

Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.

Abiraterone acetate is a potent drug used for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. However, currently marketed product containing crystalline abiraterone acetate exhibits strong positive food effect which results in strict dosing regimen. In the present work, a rational approach towards design of novel abiraterone acetate formulations that would allow increased bioavailability on a fasting stomach and thus decreased food effect is presented. Precipitation experiments in biorelevant media were designed to assess pH induced precipitation of the drug and a pool of polymeric excipients was then screened for their potential to inhibit precipitation. The best performing polymeric excipients were subsequently used as carriers for the preparation of amorphous solid dispersions. Two main approaches were followed in order to formulate the drug. The first approach relies on the suppression of precipitation from a supersaturated solution whereas the second one is based on the hypothesis that when the release of the drug is tuned, optimal uptake of the drug can be reached. Optimized formulation prototypes were tested in a rat animal model in an incomplete block, randomized bioequivalence study to assess their relative bioavailability under fasting conditions. We show that both formulation approaches lead to increased bioavailability of abiraterone acetate on a fasting stomach with bioavailability in rats being enhanced up to 250% compared to the original drug product containing crystalline drug.

Risk-Based Approach for Analytical Comparability and Comparability Protocols.

Chemistry, manufacturing, and control postapproval changes are an intrinsic part of the life cycle of pharmaceutical products. In this paper, the authors examined the potential impact of such changes on the product quality, safety, and efficacy of biologics. Comparability studies and more specifically analytical comparability are introduced as one of the tools that can support both biomanufacturers and health agencies in ensuring that patient safety and product safety and efficacy is maintained through the proposed changes. Together with a scientific risk-based review approach based on product and process knowledge and the definition of acceptance criteria that will ensure that the product is "essentially similar", what constitutes a holistic comparability study is detailed. ICH Guidelines principles and definitions are used throughout the paper to aid the reader with other appropriate references. Finally, two case studies are presented: change to the manufacturing facility of the drug substance, and change to the manufacturing process of a drug substance intermediate and manufacturing facility.

Unified approaches to assessing treatment effect of traditional Chinese medicine based on health profiles.

Two dissimilarity indices are introduced to measure the disharmony of a human body system by mimicking the population bioequivalence and the individual bioequivalence concepts. Hypotheses for the treatment effect of a traditional Chinese medicine are formulated based on the two indices and then tested under the proposed designs by reverting an approximate confidence upper bound. The proposed methods can also be used when a drug product has multiple components or a trial has multiple endpoints.

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Rivaroxaban, a Narrow-Therapeutic-Index Drug, in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of 2 formulations of the 10-mg rivaroxaban tablet. The study was a randomized, open-label, 4-period, crossover study that included 28 healthy subjects in fasting or fed conditions. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on the concentrations of rivaroxaban using high-performance liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector. In each of the 4 study periods with fasting or fed conditions, a single dose of test or reference product was administered. Rivaroxaban concentrations in plasma were determined using a validated liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector method. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t , AUC0-∞ ), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax ), time to achieve Cmax , elimination half-life, within-subject variability of test drug, and within-subject variability of reference drug. The geometric mean ratio (90%CI) of the test drug/reference drug for rivaroxaban was 90.38% to 103.60% for AUC0-t in fasting conditions and 90.13% to 100.42% in fed conditions. The AUC0-∞ s were 89.94% to 102.50% and 90.14% to 100.45% under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. The Cmax values were 90.58% to 105.01% and 96.36% to 108.07% in these 2 conditions, respectively. All 90%CIs for test drug/reference drug geometric mean ratio were ≤2.5. The 90%CIs for test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio were within the acceptable range for BE. There were no adverse events encountered during this BE study. The study's results indicated that the 2 formulations of the rivaroxaban tablet were bioequivalent.

Vitamin C Bioequivalence from Gummy and Caplet Sources in Healthy Adults: A Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Background: The efficacy of Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) supplementation can be assessed by uptake into the blood and retention in leukocytes. Vitafusion® Power C gummy is an alternative vitamin C source which may exhibit similar bioavailability to comparator caplets.Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of vitamin C from a vitafusion® Power C gummy formulation and a comparator caplet in healthy adults.Methods: Thirty healthy men and women, 34.0 ± 11.4 years of age and Body Mass Index (BMI) 24.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2 completed the randomized examiner-blind, comparator controlled, cross-over trial with two sequences: gummy (1000 mg) to caplet (1000 mg) or caplet to gummy. Intake of foods fortified with Vitamin C was restricted 7 days prior to each dosing. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h post-dose for plasma and leukocytes; and urine was collected pre-dose and between 0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-12 and 12-24 h post-dose for L-ascorbic acid analysis.Results: Vitafusion® Power C gummy and comparator caplet demonstrated similar plasma absorption profiles as there were no significant differences in plasma L-ascorbic acid total Area Under the Curve (AUC)0-24h, and Tmax between gummy and caplet. The caplet did elicit a significantly higher Cmax than the gummy (p < 0.05), however, the difference was numerically small. Leukocyte L-ascorbic acid total AUC0-24h and Cmax were not significantly different between gummy and caplet, however Tmax of the gummy group was significantly longer (p = 0.012). Urinary L-ascorbic acid levels were also not significantly different between gummy and caplet. There were no serious adverse events and safety parameters remained within normal clinical range for both products.Conclusion: Vitafusion® Power C gummy exhibited similar Vitamin C absorption and bioavailability to a comparator caplet in healthy adults and were considered bioequivalent.