Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 494
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1645-1653, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38192163

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comedone extraction provides greater satisfaction for acne treatment than conventional treatment alone; however, post-comedone extraction erythema (PCEE) remains a concern for patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of pulsed-dye laser (PDL) in PCEE and comedone reduction. METHODS: Mild-to-moderate acne patients were randomly allocated in split-face fashion. Three comedones were extracted on each facial side. On the PDL-treated side, 595-nm PDL was delivered to the entire side with an additional shot on three comedone-extracted sites. Erythema index (EI) and total acne lesion counts (TALC) were evaluated at baseline, week 2 and 4. The comprehensive acne severity scale (CASS) was assessed by three blinded independent pediatric dermatologists. Participant satisfaction surveys were completed at the end of the study. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (age 12.9-24.2 years) showed no differences in the EI and TALC at baseline on both sides. At weeks 2 and 4, the EI on the PDL-treated side was significantly lower (p < 0.001) with a greater EI reduction (p < 0.001) when compared to the control side regardless of gender and menstruation. There was significantly lower TALC on the PDL-treated side at week 2 (p < 0.001) and week 4 (p = 0.02). No complications were noted with high participant satisfaction reported (median 8; IQR 7-9). PDL remained significantly associated with EI improvements after controlling for gender, menstruation cycle, and examination stress. CONCLUSION: PDL can be an adjunctive intervention for the treatment of PCEE and comedone reduction due to its effectiveness and high participant satisfaction.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Eritema , Lasers de Corante , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Feminino , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Eritema/etiologia , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Acne Vulgar/terapia , Acne Vulgar/radioterapia , Adolescente , Criança , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação
2.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed ; 40(1): e12935, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018017

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) is a versatile technique for treating skin diseases. Melasma, a chronic hyperpigmentation condition, has recently been associated with vascular features and dermal photoaging and poses significant management challenges. We review the recent literature on melasma etiology and the evidence supporting PBM as a therapeutic modality for melasma treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in three different databases from May to August 2023, focusing on studies published in the past 10 years. The inclusion criteria comprised full-text studies investigating low-power lasers and/or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro or in vivo models, as well as clinical trials. We excluded studies discussing alternative melasma therapies or lacking experimental data. We identified additional studies by searching the reference lists of the selected articles. RESULTS: We identified nine relevant studies. Clinical studies, in agreement with in vitro experiments and animal models, suggest that PBM effectively reduces melasma-associated hyperpigmentation. Specific wavelengths (red: 630 nm; amber: 585 and 590 nm; infrared: 830 and 850 nm) at radiant exposures between 1 and 20 J/cm2 exert modulatory effects on tyrosinase activity, gene expression, and protein synthesis of melanocytic pathway components, and thus significantly reduce the melanin content. Additionally, PBM is effective in improving the dermal structure and reducing erythema and neovascularization, features recently identified as pathological components of melasma. CONCLUSION: PBM emerges as a promising, contemporary, and non-invasive procedure for treating melasma. Beyond its role in inhibiting melanogenesis, PBM shows potential in reducing erythema and vascularization and improving dermal conditions. However, robust and well-designed clinical trials are needed to determine optimal light parameters and to evaluate the effects of PBM on melasma thoroughly.


Assuntos
Hiperpigmentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Melanose , Animais , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Melanose/radioterapia , Melanose/complicações , Lasers , Eritema/etiologia
4.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 41(10): 560-568, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788452

RESUMO

Objective: This research aims to determine the effect photobiomodulation treatment has on oral inflammation after routine dental prophylaxis in canines. Background: Photobiomodulation therapy after dental procedures has been documented to reduce inflammation in human and animal models. Methods: Canines were randomly assigned into three groups: control group (CG; n = 15), left side treated group (LTG; n = 15), and right side treated group (RTG; n = 15). The canines in the treatment groups received four points of irradiation [GaAlInP-650 nm, continuous wave (CW), 0.1 W, 0.2 W/cm2, 100 sec, 10 J, 20 J/cm2]. The gingiva was evaluated by a veterinary investigator blinded to the treatment groups for erythema and edema on the day following treatment. Student's t-test and Student's paired t-test were used for data analysis. Results: Reductions in composite inflammation (p = 0.008) and erythema (p = 0.030) were observed in the LTG relative to the CG at the location of the left dental arcade. Reductions in composite inflammation (p = 0.025) and erythema (p = 0.013) were also observed in the combined treated arcades of the LTG and RTG when compared to the CG. Conclusions: The results indicate that the canines who received a single photobiomodulation treatment on the left dental arcade demonstrated a decrease in inflammation and erythema.


Assuntos
Gengiva , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Animais , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/radioterapia , Inflamação/radioterapia , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos
5.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 158(3): 236-242, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37166752

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Facial erythema can be seen in many patients. Despite various clinical trials exploring the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) in treating facial erythema, comprehensive evidence about the specific outcomes remains lacking. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched published studies in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases based on established inclusion criteria. We calculated odds ratios (OR) to evaluate the effectiveness of IPL in patients with facial erythema. We used Review Manager 5.4.1 software for statistical data analyses with a 95% confidence interval (CI). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This review includes seven studies with 219 patients, of which five compared the efficacy of IPL with pulsed dye laser (PDL). IPL significantly improved facial erythema compared to no treatment (OR=56.64, 95% CI: 22.70-141.33; P<0.00001). However, there was no significant difference between IPL and PDL treatment (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.31-3.22; P=1.00). Moreover, there was no significant difference in patients with a >50% reduction in telangiectasias between IPL and PDL treatment (OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.56; P=1.00). Furthermore, IPL therapy had no apparent adverse effects for most people besides transitory edema and erythema. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicated that IPL could effectively and safely improve facial erythema with similar efficacy to PDL. Based on its comprehensive function, light side effects, and long curative effect, IPL appears to be a good alternative for treating facial erythema. However, further prospective and high-quality studies are required.


Assuntos
Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Lasers de Corante , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/terapia , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Telangiectasia/terapia , Telangiectasia/etiologia
6.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 22(10): 2714-2720, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37082869

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease that is more common in young population and it can be associated with some sequels after resolving the lesions. Post-inflammatory erythema is one of these complications that can be disturbing for patients and does not have any definite treatment. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TA) as mesotherapy in treatment of post-acne erythema (PAE) treatment. METHOD: This clinical trial study was performed in the dermatology clinic on 17 patients with persistent PAE (3 months after acne recovery). Two sessions of treatment were performed by a physician with 2-week intervals; TA was injected as mesotherapy into the right side of each patient's face as the case group, while the opposite side was used as the control group. A Visioface device was used to compare before and after treatment photographs of each side of the face in color mode with quantitative measures such as lesions count, area, and area percent. RESULTS: Finally, 15 patients completed treatment sessions. There were statistically significant differences in right side lesions before and after treatment with p-values of 0.047, 0.002, and 0.035 for count, area, and area percent, respectively. There was no significant difference before and after treatment in terms of count, area. and area-percent on the left side. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, TA injection as mesotherapy for resolving PAE can be effective. However, due to small sample size, further studies are needed.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Mesoterapia , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Acne Vulgar/complicações , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Acne Vulgar/patologia , Eritema/tratamento farmacológico , Eritema/etiologia , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Lasers Surg Med ; 55(4): 414-422, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal devices are convenient for consumers. Consumer safety associated with home-use IPL devices, however, remains a subject of interest. In this descriptive analysis, we assessed the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) for a home-use IPL device from postmarketing surveillance and qualitatively compared these with AEs from clinical studies and medical device reports of home-use IPL treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this analysis of voluntary reports, we queried a distributor's postmarketing database for IPL devices for the period beginning January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. All sources of comments, for example, phone, e-mail, company-sponsored web sites, were included in the analysis. AE data were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Also, we conducted a PubMed search to identify AE profiles from existing literature on home-use IPL devices and we searched the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for reports on home-use IPL devices. These results were qualitatively compared to the data in the postmarketing surveillance database. RESULTS: A total of 1692 cases involving IPL were identified from voluntary reports of AEs between 2016 and 2021. The shipment-adjusted reporting rate for AE cases (number of AE cases/100,000 shipped IPL devices) was 67/100,000 during this 6-year period. The most commonly reported AEs were pain of skin 27.8% (470/1692), "thermal burn" 18.7% (316/1692), and erythema 16.0% (271/1692). Among the top 25 AEs reported, no unexpected health events were observed. The reported AEs were qualitatively similar to the pattern seen in clinical studies and the MAUDE database associated with such home-use IPL treatments. CONCLUSION: This is the first such report documenting AEs for home-use IPL hair removal from a postmarketing surveillance program. These data are supportive of the safety of such home-use low-fluence IPL technology.


Assuntos
Remoção de Cabelo , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Humanos , Remoção de Cabelo/efeitos adversos , Pele , Eritema/etiologia , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Dor
9.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 20237, 2022 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36424456

RESUMO

Affective immunology of the skin is a growing area; however, established protocols for measuring individual differences in cutaneous inflammation are lacking. To address this, we present a preliminary validation of Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (PI-MED) testing as a method for measuring cutaneous inflammation. PI-MED is a recently adapted protocol, optimized for reproducibility and individual differences research, that uses ultraviolet (UV) light to evoke cutaneous erythema, or inflammatory skin reddening. PI-MED's novel UV dosage schedule produces standardized erythema responses across different skin pigmentation types and shows strong internal consistency within person and good test-retest reliability across 8-10 weeks. In line with predictions, increased PI-MED erythema was associated with heightened anhedonia, across several measures, beyond influences of non-affective covariates. While future work should further refine the dosage schedule for the lightest and darkest skin types, overall, evidence supports PI-MED as a protocol for inducing and measuring individual differences in cutaneous inflammation. Further, PI-MED-induced erythema can expand psychoneuroimmunology research by offering a complementary assessment for general inflammatory tone. This work adds to a growing body of evidence demonstrating a distinct relationship between inflammation and anhedonia.


Assuntos
Anedonia , Dermatite , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Eritema/etiologia , Inflamação
10.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(12): e15970, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36346028

RESUMO

Melasma is an acquired hyperpigmentation disease characterized by hyperpigmented patches in sun-exposed areas that significantly impairs life quality. Topical treatments such as hydroquinone, retinoic acid, azelaic acid, chemical peels and laser treatments are among the main treatment options. In our study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of Jessner peeling and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in melasma treatment. For this purpose, Jessner peeling was applied to 20 patients and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser was applied to 19 patients of 39 melasma patients who applied to the cosmetology unit of Ege University department of dermatology and venereal diseases between November 2018-March 2020. Thirty seven patients completed the study. Changes in MASI, pigment and erythema scores measured by mexameter before and after treatment were compared for two groups. A statistically significant decrease in MASI scores, pigment and erythema scores was observed in both groups with no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, in our study, it has been shown that Jessner peeling and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser are equally effective in treatment of melasma.


Assuntos
Abrasão Química , Hiperpigmentação , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Melanose , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Melanose/radioterapia , Eritema/diagnóstico , Eritema/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(11): 5709-5715, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is a widespread dermatologic condition, and no optimal treatments have been established so far. OBJECTIVE: To investigated the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of short-wave radiofrequency (SWRF) and intense pulsed light (IPL) in improving transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and facial erythema in sensitive skin patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with sensitive skin received the SWRF treatment once per week for 4 weeks and IPL treatment once. Digital photographs and three-dimensional images were taken at each follow-up. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by the improvement of sensitive scale-10 including irritant symptoms and facial erythema. In addition, erythema area and TEWL values were measured. RESULTS: All patients showed subjective and objective improvement in irritant sensations and facial erythema after treatment. The TEWL values decreased from 20.29 ± 5.97 g·h-1 ·m-2 at baseline to 14.70 ± 6.02 g·h-1 ·m-2 after SWRF treatment and 13.78 ± 4.70 g·h-1 ·m-2 after combined therapy (p = 0.000). The clearance of the erythema area was statistically significant, with 14.05% ± 5.71% at baseline, 9.38% ± 4.08% after SWRF treatment, and 5.73% ± 2.79% after combined therapy (p = 0.000). No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SWRF with IPL was effective in relieving skin irritant sensations and facial erythema of sensitive skin by repairing skin barrier function.


Assuntos
Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Irritantes , Humanos , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa/efeitos adversos
12.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(9): 3759-3767, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin condition of varying severity that can significantly impact patient quality of life. Intense pulsed light (IPL) is an established treatment for rosacea-associated telangiectasia, inflammation, and erythema. This study assessed whether application of a phyto-corrective mask, gel, and resveratrol antioxidant serum after IPL treatment can improve outcomes and reduce procedure-related adverse effects. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, split-face, 3-month study, 10 subjects with moderate-to-severe facial rosacea underwent IPL treatment on both sides of the face. The following were applied to the right side of the face only: phyto-corrective mask once weekly starting immediately after IPL; phyto-corrective gel twice daily; and resveratrol antioxidant treatment at night. Both sides of the face were treated with sunscreen. Subjects were assessed on Day 1, 1 and 3 months after IPL by three, independent evaluators using the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). All subjects rated skin redness, hydration, and overall improvement on Day 1 and completed a patient satisfaction questionnaire at the 1- and 3-month visits. RESULTS: Ten women were enrolled, aged 44-72 years old, with moderate (n = 6) to severe (n = 4) rosacea. IPL was effective at reducing symptoms with rosacea classified as absent in five women and mild in five at the final 3-month visit. GAIS scores also revealed improvements on both sides of the face, but the skincare treated side showed continuous improvement over 3 months with all patients remaining at least "Improved", whereas there appeared to be a waning effect after 1 month with IPL alone. On Day 1 after IPL, all women reported less redness, improved hydration, and improved skin appearance on the right side of the face. Patient satisfaction was consistently rated higher on the right side of the face. CONCLUSION: Application of a phyto-corrective mask, gel, and resveratrol antioxidant serum may complement IPL treatment for rosacea by enhancing treatment outcomes and reducing procedure-related symptoms.


Assuntos
Rosácea , Protetores Solares , Adulto , Idoso , Antioxidantes/efeitos adversos , Eritema/diagnóstico , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Resveratrol , Rosácea/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(7): 2801-2807, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34636493

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of melasma is challenging. Topical TA has shown promising results as an adjuvant, when combined with microneedling or QS Nd:YAG laser. The efficacy of both combinations has been demonstrated but the efficacy between these two combinations has never been compared. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and side effects of microneedling and QS Nd:YAG laser when combined with topical 3% TA gel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group A received Nd:YAG laser sessions monthly with daily 3% TA gel while Group B underwent microneedling monthly with daily 3% TA gel. A total of 5 sessions were given with follow-up after 2 months. Evaluation using modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Patient satisfaction score, and photography was done at baseline, 3rd session, 5th session, and final follow-up. RESULTS: Mean fall in mMASI at follow-up in Group A was 5.12 ± 2.66 to 2.33 ± 1.33 and Group B was 4.60 ± 2.38 to 1.88 ± 1.08 (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was not significantly different. Side effects of both interventions included erythema, pain, and burning sensation. CONCLUSION: Our study shows equal efficacy of microneedling and QS Nd:YAG laser when combined with topical 3% TA gel in treating melasma without serious side effects. Microneedling has more downtime and maybe less preferable as a lunchtime procedure.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Melanose , Ácido Tranexâmico , Eritema/etiologia , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Melanose/tratamento farmacológico , Melanose/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Lasers Surg Med ; 54(3): 366-373, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Melasma is a common, therapeutically challenging, and very often relapsing disorder of hyperpigmentation most often observed in women. Low-fluence, multipass technique with Q-switched-mode laser-"laser toning" is broadly used to treat melasma, especially in Asia. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of a series of laser treatments with very short, nanosecond pulses in the treatment of melasma in Caucasian women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty polish females with Fitzpatrick skin phototype II-III and melasma were treated with 1064 nm Q-switched neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (QSNY) laser (pulse with 5 ns; spot size, 6-8 mm; fluence, 1.7-3.2 J/cm2 ; 2-8 passes; nine treatments). Melanin index (MI), erythema index (EI) by Mexameter MX18®, the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), and the participant's self-assessment were used to evaluate the treatment results. Twenty-one patients were subjected to a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Significant improvement in melasma pigmentation was observed in the mean MI and mMASI score; both were significantly reduced (p < 0.0001). Significant erythema reduction was achieved (p < 0.001). In total, 70% of participants rated the laser as a method that met their expectations for treating melasma. Clinical follow-up after one year showed that the reduced melasma effect was still maintained. Patients also noticed improved skin conditions (radiance, smoothness, brightness, hydration, regeneration). No serious adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low-fluence 1064 nm QSNY laser is an effective, safe, and noninvasive method with long-term results in melasma treatment. QSNY (1064 nm) improves the condition of melasma patients with erythema.


Assuntos
Hiperpigmentação , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Melanose , Eritema/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperpigmentação/etiologia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Melanose/radioterapia , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 33(4): 1990-1994, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33961534

RESUMO

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of red light LED as an adjuvant treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced paronychia. Eight patients were recruited in this randomized, single-blinded controlled trial. They were randomized to receive red-light on one hand or foot 2-3 times/week for 6 weeks while the contralateral side served as controls. The standard treatments were continued. Erythema and lesion elevation observed by Anthera® 3D, severity and pain scores were obtained at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8. The red light group showed significantly lower erythema, severity, and pain scores at weeks 4, 6, and 8. The elevation was significantly lower in the red light group at every follow-up visit. No adverse events occurred. Red light therapy may be an option as adjunctive treatment for EGFRi-induced paronychia.


Assuntos
Paroniquia , Fototerapia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Eritema/etiologia , Eritema/terapia , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Paroniquia/induzido quimicamente , Paroniquia/complicações , Paroniquia/terapia , Fototerapia/métodos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA