The New Therapeutic Frontiers in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Biological Drugs.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifaceted disease characterized by a wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, endoscopic and histopathologic patterns, and responsiveness to therapy. From the perspective of an effective approach to the patient, the different inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of EoE and biologics, in particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), targeting these pathways are needed. Currently, the most relevant is dupilumab, which interferes with both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 pathways by binding IL-4 receptor α, and is the only mAb approved by the European Medicine Agency and US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of EoE. Other mAbs investigated include mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (interfering with IL-5 axis), cendakimab and dectrekumab (anti-IL-13s), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), lirentelimab (anti-SIGLEG-8), and many others. Despite the undeniable economic impact of biologic therapies, in the near future, there will be room for further reflection about the opportunity to prescribe biologic agents, not only as a last-line therapy in selected cases such as patients with comorbidities involving common pathways. Although recent findings are very encouraging, the road to permanent success in the treatment of EoE is still long, and further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of mAbs and to discover new potential targets.

Reduction of Th2 inflammation and fibrosis in eosinophilic esophagitis in a murine model by citri reticulatae pericarpium.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Inflammation and subepithelial fibrosis play major roles in the early pathology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there are currently no pharmacotherapeutic interventions that directly target eosinophilic esophagitis. Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP, known as Chen-Pi) is one of most frequently used qi-regulating drugs in Chinese medicine and nutrition. CRP is rich with flavonones and polymethoxy flavones, both of which exhibit superior anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic and anti-fibrosis effects. This study is to investigate intervention effect of CRP on EoE, to identify its active compounds and to explore its underlying mechanisms. METHODS: The CRP extract was obtained by liquid-liquid extraction with 70% ethanol, and its main components were identified by HPLC and TLC chromatography as hesperidin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and narirutin in turn. Furthermore, we evaluated its effect and underlying mechanisms in an PN (Peanut protein extract)-sensitized murine model of food allergy induced EoE. RESULTS: CRP treatment attenuated EoE model mice symptomatology, blocked hypothermia, reduced the production of PN-specific IgE and IgG1 and TH2 cytokines (interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5), and increased the level of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and interferon (IFN)-γ. CRP treatment also significantly alleviated the pathological damage and reduced fibrosis in inflamed tissues like esophagus, lung, and intestine. These results were strongly associated with reducing the expression of p-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-ß1) and p-Smad 3 proteins. CONCLUSION: CRP extract markedly inhibited TH2 immune response and attenuated subepithelial fibrosis with a dose-dependent manner through down-regulating MAPK/TGF-ß signaling pathway. It is suggested that CRP extract might serve as a potential therapy for food allergy-induced EoE like disease.

Food elimination diet is a viable alternative therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis responsive to proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) includes monotherapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), food elimination diet (FED), or topical corticosteroids. Current guidelines suggest patients with EoE should continue any responsive first-line monotherapies. However, the efficacy of FED monotherapy in patients with EoE responsive to PPI monotherapy has not been well studied. Our study aimed to investigate how attempting FED monotherapy after experiencing remission of EoE after PPI monotherapy influenced long-term EoE management. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with EoE responsive to PPI monotherapy who trialed FED monotherapy. We then employed a mixed method approach to a prospective cohort. Selected patients were observed long term for quantitative outcomes, while qualitative results were obtained from patient surveys regarding their perspectives on the trial of FED monotherapy. RESULTS: We identified 22 patients who trialed FED monotherapy after experiencing remission of EoE following PPI monotherapy. Of these 22 patients, 13 had remission of EoE with FED monotherapy, while 9 had re-activation of EoE. Out of 22 patients, 15 were enrolled in a cohort for observation. No exacerbations of EoE occurred while on maintenance treatment. Most patients stated that they would recommend this process to others with EoE (93.33%) and that trial of FED monotherapy helped them identify a treatment plan that aligned with their lifestyle (80%). CONCLUSION: Our work shows that FED monotherapy can be an effective alternative for patients with EoE responsive to PPI monotherapy that may improve patient quality of life, suggesting alternative treatment options should be considered for monotherapy-responsive EoE.

Histologic response to steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis is dependent on delivery compound.

Topical steroids are commonly used in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but currently there is lack of data to clarify most effective regimen. We aimed to study the achievement of histologic remission using the same dose of budesonide in two different delivery formulations. Patients with established EoE treated with pharmacy compounded budesonide capsule or budesonide Rincinol gel (both 3 mg twice daily) were studied retrospectively. Those with pre-treatment and post-treatment histologic assessment were included with main endpoint being histologic remission. 103 patients (62 gel, 41 capsule) were included, with higher rate of histologic remission with gel (84 vs. 59%, P=0.004). A subset of patients in both groups had lack of steroid response (<50% drop in eosinophils) (15% for gel, 32% for capsule). Formulation/delivery vehicle of steroid treatments to esophageal mucosa in EoE appears important for treatment efficacy, with budesonide gel having higher likelihood of histologic remission compared to budesonide capsules in our population. A truly steroid refractory group appears likely in our population. Larger, prospective studies may help clarify best regimen of topical steroids in EoE and may work to identify patients likely to benefit from alternative therapies.

What influences complementary medicine use for children with eosinophilic esophagitis? Findings from a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Utilization of complementary medicines (CMs) amongst children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in Australia is high. Carers' beliefs, perceptions and use of CM can influence the decision to use CM in children in their care. This study explores the factors influencing the use of CM for a child's EoE when the carer also uses CM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Carers of children aged 0-18 years with EoE participated in a national cross-sectional online survey, conducted in Australia between September 2018 and February 2019. Data analysis included bivariate analysis, Cramer's V, backwards stepwise logistic regression and binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 181 total survey responses, 165 (91.2 %) respondents indicated they had utilized some form of CM for themselves. Children whose carer had used some form of CM for themselves were more likely to have used CM than children whose carer had not used CM (OR 4.6; p = 0.001). Of the CM self-using carers, 125 (75.8 %) had also chosen to utilize CM for their child's EoE. Use of CM in children was more likely amongst children who had used a pharmaceutical for their EoE (OR 7.51; p = 0.010), and those whose carer had consulted with "other health practitioners or health workers" for their child's EoE (OR 5.34; p < 0.001) or had consulted with a chiropractor for themselves (OR 2.70; p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: High CM self-use amongst carers is associated with their decision to also use CM for their child's EoE, a concern given the absence of evidence for CM's safety and efficacy in this population. CM use in this population warrants further attention. Effective conventional medicines for EoE are limited and utilization of CM amongst children with EoE in Australia is high. The recommendation of CM for children with EoE warrants further attention given the substantial concomitant pharmaceutical care, and the absence of evidence for CM's safety and efficacy in this population. Further research into the role of CM practitioners, products, and therapies in an integrative model between CM and conventional healthcare must be undertaken.

Successful Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Case Report.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively recently described condition, with rapidly increasing prevalence over the past several years. There is unfortunately no cure for EoE, and treatment involves food elimination and off-label use of topical steroids. These treatments can have significant impacts on quality of life for patients. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been shown to decrease Th2 cytokines which are implicated in the pathophysiology of EoE. We present an 11-year-old male with severe EoE who was treated with TCM and able to achieve complete remission. Further modalities of treatment for EoE should continue to be pursued.

Antifibrotic Effects of the Thiazolidinediones in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Pathologic Remodeling: A Preclinical Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a T-helper 2 (Th2), eosinophilic disease associated with pathologic tissue remodeling that leads to end-organ dysfunction. During early-stage disease, inflammation and subepithelial fibrosis are coupled and reversible, but in late-stage or therapy-resistant disease, there can be uncoupling of these features with progressive esophageal rigidity and strictures contributing to clinical dysphagia and food impactions. No current pharmacotherapeutic interventions directly target esophageal fibrosis. Based on the ability of the thiazolidinediones (TZD) to regulate intestinal and hepatic fibrosis, we tested the antifibrotic effects of the TZDs, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, in preclinical studies using primary human esophageal fibroblasts. METHODS: Primary fibroblasts isolated from normal or EoE esophagi were treated with transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 in the absence or presence of TZDs and, in some experiments, without or with budesonide and analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and immunoblotting. Immunohistochemical analysis of human esophageal biopsies was performed. RESULTS: EoE esophageal biopsies and esophageal fibroblasts expressed higher levels of the TZD receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), than normal controls. PPAR-γ was inducible by the Th2 cytokine, interleukin 4 (IL-4). TZD significantly reduced TGF-ß1-induced myofibroblast and fibrotic gene and protein expression preferentially in EoE, but not normal esophageal fibroblasts. In esophageal fibroblasts, TGF-ß1 increased phosphorylated Smad2/3 and p38, but TZDs preferentially inhibited p38 phosphorylation, suggesting signaling pathway-specific effects. The TZDs were more potent than budesonide at decreasing collagen-1α1 expression. DISCUSSION: The TZDs preferentially exert antifibrotic effects in TGF-ß1-activated EoE fibroblasts and provide a preclinical foundation for further investigation of the potential of the TZDs in EoE pathologic remodeling.

PPI Trial for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Chaos in the Community.

INTRODUCTION: Despite consensus eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) statement published in 2011 calling for a 2-month trial of protons pump inhibitor (PPI), the guidelines are not followed by many. We studied the practice patterns in our community and response to a PPI retrial in patients previously diagnosed with "idiopathic EoE." METHODS: All patients presenting to the senior author's practice with suspected EoE from 2011 to 2015. Two cohorts were studied: (1) patients diagnosed in the community as "idiopathic EoE"; (2) treatment naïve patients given a PPI trial at University of South Florida. PPI responsive eosinophilia was defined after 2 months of high dose PPIs after initial diagnosis of mucosal eosinophilia and histologic response of <15 eosinophils per HPF. SPSS v19.0 was used to calculate mean difference and odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients met inclusion criteria, 46 patients had outside diagnosis of "idiopathic EoE," and 41 patients received a PPI trial at University of South Florida. In total, 34/46 (73.9%) community patients were placed on a PPI, 3/46 (6.5%) were placed on elimination diets, 31/46 (67.4%) steroids, and 21/46 (45.7%) were treated with both steroids/PPIs. Fewer patients received PPI trials in the community 3/46 (6.5%) versus 26/34 (76.5%) at our center [OR, 46.6 (95% CI, 11.3-191.5); P<0.0001]. In total, 12/26 (46.2%) were PPI responders on our retrial despite previously being diagnosed with idiopathic EoE. The group initially diagnosed at our center had a higher PPI response rate 12/15 (80%) versus 12/26 (46.2%) in the community group [OR, 7.58 (1.42, 40.55; P=0.018)]. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of a PPI trial is misunderstood and may be confused with the more traditional PPI trial for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This algorithm is critical and should be done before empiric steroids/diet therapies.

A prospective open clinical trial of a proton pump inhibitor, elimination diet and/or budesonide for eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Elimination diets and high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are advocated as first-line treatments in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). AIM: To record the treatment outcome for patients with EoE prospectively managed according to a clinical algorithm. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal eosinophilia commenced esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Those in histological remission were re-classified as PPI-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia. Nonresponders were offered the 6-food elimination diet with a PPI, or topical budesonide monotherapy (1 mg orally twice daily as an aqueous gel). Once disease control was achieved remission was reassessed at 3 months (all modalities) and an additional 6 months (diet group). RESULTS: Of 107 patients who completed 8 weeks of PPI, 25 (23%) were PPI-responsive. 56 of 81 (69%) of patients with EoE chose the elimination diet with PPI. 29 (52%) had complete remission, 23 completed dietary reintroduction and food triggers were identified in 20 (36%). 25 chose budesonide with 23/25 (92%) responding. Remission was sustained in >85% of patients at 3 months with all treatment modalities. At 9 months, only 10/18 (55%) of patients who responded to the elimination diet with PPI remained complaint and sustained remission. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients previously diagnosed with EoE will respond to PPI. Initial response >50% is possible with the elimination diet plus PPI, but many will fail to undergo food reintroduction, or will cease the diet and relapse, resulting in only one in four patient sustaining remission at 9 months. Budesonide is very effective short term, but longer term study is needed.

High Prevalence of Response to Proton-pump Inhibitor Treatment in Children With Esophageal Eosinophilia.

OBJECTIVES: Proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia is a newly recognized entity with an unclear prevalence in children, as only retrospective data are available. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical features of proton-pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia in children. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients with esophageal symptoms and esophageal eosinophilic counts as 15 or more than 15 eos/hpf (eosinophils per high-power field). Children received treatment with esomeprazole 1 mg ·â€Škg per dose twice daily for 8 weeks and the endoscopy was repeated. Complete response to proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) was defined as 5 or less than 5 eos/hpf, and a partial response as >5 and <15 eos/hpf in post-treatment biopsies. RESULTS: Fifty-one children (74.5% boys) were included. Histological response was observed in 35 children (68.6%): 24 children (47%) had a complete response and 11 children (21.6%) had a partial response. Only 16 children (31.4%) were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). There were no differences in history of atopy, allergy tests, pH study results, and endoscopic scores. Clinical symptoms were similar, with the exception of food impaction, which was more frequent in children with EoE (56.2% vs 20%, P = 0.01). The mean pretreatment peak eosinophil count was higher in patients with EoE (74.8 ±â€Š36.2 vs 46.3 ±â€Š30.7, P = 0.007). Eleven of the 14 patients (78.6%) on a lower PPI treatment maintenance dose remained in clinicopathologic remission at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of children with esophageal eosinophilia responded to high dose PPI treatment. Clinical, endoscopic, and pH study results were similar, with exception of patients with EoE, who were more likely to experience food impaction and have higher esophageal eosinophil counts.

The efficacy of step-down therapy in adult patients with proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is common in patients with suspected eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). However, the long-term efficacy of PPIs and the best maintenance doses are yet to be defined. AIM: To evaluate the durability of the response to PPI therapy after tapering PPI doses in PPI-REE patients. METHODS: Prospective study conducted on PPI-REE patients. Upon complete remission on high-dose PPI therapy (omeprazole 40 mg b.d. for 8 weeks), PPI doses were tapered followed by an endoscopic procedure after each dose reduction. The primary outcomes were sustained clinical and histological remission (<15 eos/HPF) after decreasing PPI doses. RESULTS: From a total of 121 patients with suspected EoE, 40 (33%) achieved complete remission on high-dose PPIs and were given a diagnosis of PPI-REE. No patient in histological remission showed symptom relapse, but half of patients with relapsing oesophageal inflammation were in clinical remission. After reduction to omeprazole 40 mg once daily, 38/31 (81%) remained in complete remission. Among these latter patients, 15/18 (83%) were kept in remission with omeprazole 20 mg once daily. As for side effects, only asymptomatic hypertransaminasemia and oesophageal candidiasis were observed in two patients while receiving high doses of omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Most PPI-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia patients show sustained clinical and histological remission with daily PPI doses equal to or below 40 mg of omeprazole. As adverse effects only appeared with the highest dose of omeprazole, it would be advisable to individualise the dose of PPIs for each patient, lowering it to the minimum capable of maintaining the disease controlled.

Comparison of 2 delivery vehicles for viscous budesonide to treat eosinophilic esophagitis in children.

OBJECTIVES: Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) using Splenda as a delivery vehicle has become an attractive therapeutic option for children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Many families are wary of giving the artificial sweetener in high doses to their children. The aim of the present study was to determine whether OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra, a hypoallergenic nutritional supplement, is at least as efficacious as OVB mixed with Splenda at healing EoE. METHODS: Our institutional review board approved a retrospective chart review of patients with well-documented EoE treated with OVB at the Boston Children's Hospital Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder program between June 2008 and June 2013. Primary outcome measured was histologic response defined as change in peak eosinophil count to <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF) after at least 10 weeks of OVB therapy. RESULTS: A total of 46 children were treated with OVB mixed with Splenda, and 14 were treated with OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra. The 2 groups were not significantly different in their demographic (race, age, sex) or clinical (initial eosinophil count, proton pump inhibitor use, or concomitant dietary elimination) characteristics. On follow-up endoscopy, 30 of 46 patients on Splenda and 13 of 14 patients on Neocate Nutra achieved histologic response. Mean pretreatment and posttreatment peak eosinophil counts for the children taking Neocate Nutra were 62 eos/HPF ([high-power field] range 20-120 eos/HPF) and 9 eos/HPF (range 0-100 eos/HPF), respectively. Mean pretreatment and posttreatment peak eosinophil counts for the Splenda group were 59.5 eos/HPF (range 20-180 eos/HPF) and 25.5 eos/HPF (range 0-200 eos/HPF), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of success with Neocate Nutra as compared with Splenda was 6.93 (95% CI 0.83-57.91, P = 0.0728), demonstrating the noninferiority of Neocate Nutra. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra is at least as effective as OVB mixed with Splenda at treating children with EoE. Neocate Nutra is an innovative, effective, and palatable mixing agent to create a viscous budesonide slurry for families who prefer not to use the standard recipe with Splenda.